w w w .m cgilltribune.com
S C R E W D Y L A N , T R Y R IT T E R , 23
T
R
I
B
U
N
E
Vol. 25 Issue 27 I Tuesday, April 4, 2006
P U B L I S H E D BY T H E S T U D E N T S ' S O C I E T Y OF M C G I L L U N I V E R S I T Y
T r i b u n e ’s
s i l v e r
e d i t i o n
Q
u e e r
M
c G i l l
c a l l s
f o r
b a n
H
a - Q
u é b e c
é m
o n
Six execs resign in protest over ‘stifling of debate’ NIALL MACKAY ROBERTS
The Trib takes a look back in a special pullout section celebrating our 25th anniversary. See pages 15-18.
S A
C
O
M
S S
s t o n e w
a l l e d
Adm inistration refuses to reconsider eviction JAMES G O TO W IEC The saga of the Sexual Assault Centre of McGill Students' Society continued through last week, as stu dent leaders brought the issue to Senate and pressed administrators to commit to a negotiated solution to the office-space problem. On Feb. 28, SSMU VicePresident University Affairs Max Reed received a memo from the office of Vice-Principal Administration and Finance Morty Yalovksy advising him that SACOMSS would have to vacate its confidential night office by May 31. This marks the second time in two years that volunteers at the serv ice have had to scramble to find office space. At Wednesday's Senate meet ing, Reed asked administrators to
explain why they are asking SACOMSS to leave the office space, and how McGill can claim to be a student-centred university when it is taking space away from "essential, award-winning, student-run services." Students packed the Senate meeting room to hear Provost Anthony Masi's response. Supporters of the service lined up at the back of the room and held up large laminat ed signs reading, "SACOMSS is..." along with several messages com pleting the thought, including "patient," "anonymous" and "being evicted (again)." Masi began by noting McGill does provide assistance in sexual assault cases through Mental Health Services, McGill Security and other offices. He said that SSMU had been allocated university space in accor
dance with its current memorandum of agreement, which it had chosen to give to SACOMSS, and that this space allotment would come to an end when the MOA expired at the end of May. "The university is currently expe riencing a shortage of space," he said. "It was made clear to both the SSMU and the student groups involved that the space was only allocated to them temporarily." Masi said that student leaders were free to bring up space for the service in the ongoing negotiations over the MOA. "SSMU has been told on more than one occasion," he said, "that if it wants to raise the possibility [of allocating space to SACOMSS] it will have to do so in the discussions
See PROVOST, page 3
The remnants of the Queer McGill executive passed two con tentious resolutions condemning Héma-Québec on March 27, after hours of heated debate spanning two executive meetings and a sud den spate of executive resignations. The first resolution, . which passed with six members in support, none against and one abstention, demands that Héma-Québec review its policy barring sex workers from donating blood, insisting instead that the provincial blood bank's personal history questionnaire distinguish between those who practise safe sex and those who do not. The second resolution, which passed with four votes in favour, none against, and three abstentions, calls upon the Students' Society to refuse to allow Héma-Québec to conduct future blood drives on its premises. Craig Ross, Queer McGill's trans/gender issues resource coordi nator, brought forward last Monday's motions. He explained his initiatives as a natural outcome of the anti-dis crimination clauses in the SSMU and j Queer McGill mandates. "Since Queer McGill is a SSMU ; service and SSMU's constitution states that Students' Society endeav ours be undertaken with full respect J for human dignity and without dis crimination on the basis of 'irrelevant j personal characteristics,' we're asking them not to let [Héma-Québec] con tinue to perpetuate harmful stereoi types on our Students' Society prop erty," Ross said. Though debate on the motion lasted less than ten minutes, at least j one of the seven executives present j objected to the idea of permanently banning blood drives in the Shatner building. "I very much reject the policy that prevents men who have sex with men from donating blood," said Volunteer Coordinator Nurit Shir, "but most people who give blood in
.
school would not give it otherwise. In this case, I would think more about the people who need blood than about our discrimination." Ross and others responded, however, that Héma-Québec's deci sion to ban donations from men who have sex with men (MSM) was politically motivated, citing oftrepeated claims that consumer groups pressured the organization into maintaining its restrictions in spite of medical evidence recom mending the contrary. Queer McGill Co-administrator Floh Herra Vega, who will be dealing with the ongoing controversy next year as SSMU vice-president clubs and services, remained unconvinced on the issue. "I'm perpetually conflicted on this," she said, as she, Shir and Political Coordinator Chiara Klaiman abstained on the motion to recom mend a ban on Héma-Québec func tions.
Decisive action demanded Queer McGill has been at the centre of the blood-drive controversy since last year, when its current polit ical wing first demanded that HémaQuébec revise its policy of perma nently excluding MSM from donating blood because of their presumed risk as carriers of HIV. After the radi cal queer group Second Cumming shut down the last blood drive in late January, the pressure mounted on Queer McGill to take significant action. However, recent talks between SSMU and Héma-Québec have stalled, and Vice-President Communications and Events Roz Freeman has offered little evidence of a forthcoming solution. Ross described his motions in the context of past failures at political action. "After the Second Cumming incident, we knew Queer McGill had to define its position on the blood drive a little more clearly. Either we
See RESIGNATIONS, page 3