♦
H
4
E
Published by the Students’ Society of McGill University
S ta c e y s te e rs M a r t le t s L a v a l to
News Do SSMU candidates know what they are get ting into? The Tribune’s first ever election quiz. See Page 4
Huffing and puffing will blow your brains in, plus a look at the many ways to skin a cat. See Page 9
Editorial A lament for next year’s Students’ Society See Page 6
ENTERTAINMENT Rukus music, dramatic dramas, and a sweet deal for all you faithful read ers. See Page 16
SPORTS Men’s basketball sets up for best of three provin cial championship series against ConU, after elim inating Bishop’s in the semi-finals. See page 19
Columnists T. Frankel.................... Page7 P. Darvasi.............. Page 15 B. van Dijk.................. Page7
Departm ents Crossword................... Page8 Observer.......................Page8 What’s O n............. Page 23 Sexual Assault Centre of McGill Student’s Society 398 -2700 Centre Contre l’Agression de l’Association des Étudiants de L’Université McGill
s e n d M c G ill to
n a t io n a l c h a m p io n s h ip s By Kashif Z aho or
Home court advantage. To most teams this instills confidence and a sense o f comfort. Teams in any sport, especially basketball, have superior records on their home floor. But for every rule, there are those few exceptions. The Martlets were that exception, as they posted a below-.500 record at the Currie Gym in the 1994-95 campaign. In addi tion, lingering memories of a similiar circum stance at home in the Québec U niversity Basketball League championship game were a cause for concern. Only a year ago, the McGill M artlets had their bags all but packed for Calgary for the Canadian Interuniversity A thletic Union nationals. McGill’s promising sea son was cut short tragically when they lost to Concordia on their home court in the QUBL finals. This year, tenth-ranked McGill played host to the eighth-ranked Laval Rouge et Or last Saturday in the QUBL championship game for
A th le tic s
the right to go to the CIAU nationals in Thunder Bay, Ontario. The Martlets and the Rouge et Or split the season series at two games apiece. Laval, coming off a surpris ing 70-61 win over the Stingers in the semifinals, was looking to play the role of “spoiler” again and to avenge a loss in the provincial finals two years ago against the Martlets. In the opening m inutes, the Rouge et Or effectively slowed the flow o f the game, paralysing McGill’s usually potent offence and holding the Martlets to just 12 points through the first ten minutes. The offence was also hampered by the deafening noise created courtesy of the boisterous Laval fans whose drums, symbols and constant chants of “dee-fence” caused McGill to make abundant errors. The makeshift Laval “band” coupled with the reserved M cGill crowd would lead an impartial observer to think the game was being played in Laval. See Martlets Page 19
B o a rd
By C hristopher R icney
After nearly two months of meetings, Athletics Reclassification Committee chair Sevag Yeghoyan presented the committee’s findings to the Athletics Board last Tuesday. The board voted to pass the commit tee’s reclassification recommenda tions but not to pass other elements of the report, calling for a “new and completely revised” set of reclassifi cation criteria. The new criteria would be established before the department undertakes any future review of the university’s teams and sports clubs. The team which gained the most from the reclassification review was undoubtedly track and field, which was elevated from its previous status of sports club. The co-ed team now has level-two uni versity status, providing the team with partial funding from the univer sity and improved facilities priority.
p a s s e s r e c la s s ific a tio n
The recent completion of the fieldhouse, complete with track and field competition facilities, strength ened the team ’s reclassification chances. Track and field coach Dennis Barrett explained that the reclassifi cation of his team will be critical to its success. “The goal is to be competitive not just at the provincial, but at the national level, and something like this helps to establish our program that much m ore,” said Barrett. “[Fund-raising] is also one less thing to worry about, and I won’t have to spend as much time hassling the team members to sell chocolate bars.” The Athletics Board, led by chair Richard Pound and Director of Athletics Robert Dubeau, concluded that there was not sufficient consen sus about the committee’s report to the board. The result is that the com mittee must draft another report to
A V A IL A B L E A T T H E S E L O C A T IO N S :
(*\ DIFFERENT t *
past
g o o d
•T.M. ot/M.C.AAAySCcwodelnc.
EATON CENTRE LEVEL 1 • • ST.LAIIRENT •. Corner Prince Arthur • 1 2 1 4 PEEL STREET • Our Roast Beef has less than 4% fat
be approved by the board at their next meeting later this month. The decision was made after committee members Lynn ButlerKisber, McGill’s associate dean of students, and the Martlet Foundation’s Hubert Lacroix expressed reservations about the report, which Yeghoyan drafted fol lowing the committee’s final meet ing. Lacroix, who played an integral role in the creation of the current reclassification system in 1990, was disturbed by Yeghoyan’s recom m endation that the criteria be changed, asserting that it was “prac tically a full-time job” for the 18 months during which the criteria were formulated. Lacroix, whose anger appeared to typify the lack of com m ittee consensus, failed to attend any committee meetings dur ing the review period. Lacroix, how ever, could not be reached for com ment.
in
p r in c ip le
Yeghoyan explained that reviewing the system does not have to result in its complete disposal. “I know that a lot of work went into creating this system ,” said Yeghoyan. “I don’t think that we should throw it out, but rather we should work with it to make it bet ter.” Dubeau was satisfied with both the findings of the committee and the board’s recommendation that the committee redraft the report. “I think that the committee’s findings correctly reflect where the teams and sports clubs are at this point in time,” he said. “There sim ply did not exist consensus among the committee members, and so they must meet until they can agree on a new report.” University teams and sports clubs will have until mid-March to appeal the com m ittee’s results before the committee presents its final recommendations to the board.
I1 F O R 1 \J m r $ \ I I
1
.u « u v.«7 n .«. this coupon , Valid only with
I
c2>
Valid only with this coupon
I
I0R I0IN A L SANDWICH I UNIQUE B iff & CHEDDAR]