The McGill Tribune Published by the Students' Society of McGill University
Vol. 2, No. 5, Tuesday, October 5, 1982
The Fiasco of Student Aid
Patrick H.F. Baillie
With a worsening economic climate, more students are turning to the univer sities as one way out of the recession. The pinch is rarely escaped, though, as summer employment shrinks and edu cational costs rise, leaving the student in a search for financial assistance. Stu dent aid application are up this year, but the multi-faceted -government forms
aren’t the door that they promise to be. For the several thousand McGill stu dents who annually file for provincial and federal aid, the story is familiar. First, there are applications which request a wide range of information. After completing the basics, the form asks about the economic status of stu dent, family, spouse and banker. What is the value of your personal assets or
those of your parents? How much money was saved from your summer earnings? What is your parents’ annual income? Do you own a car? Travel by transit to class? How many siblings do you have? The point of these questions is innocent enough. They simply try to determine how much you should be able to contribute towards your tuition, books, rent, food, utilities and other budget areas. However, they do not ask about the costs of your university expe rience. These figures come from either the university which you hope to attend or from the government’s own records of costs and prices. Weekly allowances are calculated and a final funding figure determined. The resources of the student aid prin ciple are not enough to cover the dream of an affordable education for all. “This year, there have been a couple of hundred more applications at McGill that at this point last year,” says Judy Stymest, Director of the Student Aid Office, “With provincial application levels up also, this effect, coupled with lower summer employment, means that this year’s payouts will be smaller.” In other words, the financial pie is the same size as in previous years, but with more people hungry for a piece, the slices get thinner and thinner.
In the competive situation, the inge nuity of a student’s mind can be fully demonstrated as loopholes are disco vered and seized. The concept of a hid den, Swiss-style bank account is not reserved for wealthy entrepreneurs. These people hide investments from the tax man; students hide it for a little security. One of the areas of the “needs assess ment” which hurts many students is that of parental contribution. The govern ment statisticians have formulae which determine just what your parent is able to provide, but they leave it to the stu dent to actually extract the money. What if your parents don’t want to or can’t support you? What if you would prefer to pay your own way? Declaring financial independence can be per formed through only two methods. One way is to complete an under graduate degree. The other is rather drastic if only serves as a loophole escape mechanism, but it is a possibility. To be married is to be considered inde pendent. The paradox is clear. While articles in The Gazelle suggest that this is a new, popular way around the inequi ties of parental assistance, Ms. Stymest does not share the opinion. “I doubt that it is really a big thing, but I think that if continued page 4
No Hurry For New Currie?
by Valerie Hanna
On close scrutiny of the student fees’ breakdown for 1982-83, it doesn’t take a financial wizard to note the introduc tion of a new stipend for McGill stu dents. An additonal $7.50 per semester or $15.00 per year per student was amassed over and above the usual regis tration fees, to facilitate the construc tion of a new athletic complex. Any objections to this remuneration were over-ruled when the Students' Society took the matter directly to the student body. Two years ago a referendum on the collection of extra monies for the con struction of a new gymnasium complex was circulated. Student support fa voured the additional fees by a two to one margin. However, the enforcement of this policy was lost in a political shuf fle, with the judicial board rejecting the proposal on a campaigning technicality. 1981-82 saw the re-introduction of the referendum with the same element of
student support being demonstrated. Again its enforcement was challenged, but upheld at the point of finality. Con sequently, the $7.50 per student per semester has been and will continue to be collected, subject to increase on the completion of the complex. The increase will not exceed $10.00 per student per semester and will remain in effect for a period of fifteen years. Fiset, Miller, Vinois, a prominent architectural firm in Montreal, took the first step in the materialization of the Currie Gym Expansion concept. Plans incorporating a 184.6 metre jogging track and a multipurpose sports room were devised over the summer months. With the lowering of the Currie Gym’s roof six to seven feet, the field house complex will be conveniently situated on its top, extending over and into Molson Stadium. Approximately 25 to 30 percent of the stadium’s seating facilities will be eliminated to accomodate the complex. The versatile sports room will
be encompassed by the four lane indoor jogging track. The room may be used as an indoor soccer field, European hand ball field, four tennis courts, four bas ketball courts, four volleyball courts, or twelve badminton courts. In any case, netting will be extended from the ceiling to the floor to mutually prevent interference of the joggers and the organized sports activities. The area may also serve as the base for a stage, with a seating capacity of 2,500. This is an outstanding point worth merit around convocation time. The main basketball court allows for 2,000 specta tors. Six new international size squash courts as well as two racquetball courts will be at the disposal of the students. New changing rooms as well as a medi cal aid room will hopefully perpetuate the McGill fighting team spirit. The construction of a press box overlooking both Molson Stadium and the indoor facilities provides for complete and efficontinued page 2
Photophobia Butch Trischman
Now that all of the beginning of the year hoopla has subsided, and it really is time to get down to brass tacks, I thought that it might be interesting to shed some light on the mysterious everevasive Xerox machine. I took the lib erty of doing some undercover work and have compiled a set of guidelines that might prove to be useful in any related future endeavors. Hopefully, this insight will help mitigate some of the anxiety of go-to-the-end-of-the-line phobia. First, a little background. There are 120 machines in non-library buildings and maybe another 30 in the libraries of McGill. Another five or six are owned outright by various depart ments which then allot rights to its members. Of course, we, the students, have access to far fewer than half of all continued page 3