Volume No. 33 Issue No. 15
TRIBUNE THE mcgill PX
Published by the Tribune Publication Society
CURIOSITY DELIVERS
READING THE FINE PRINT APARTMENT LEASING IN QUEBEC p 10
charting the charter a look at quebec's controversial bill 60 P3
@mcgilltribune • www.mcgilltribune.com
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
A Carnival classic: Redmen make it 25 straight over Gaels See inside for...
Story P 17
Neil Prokop fires a shot from the slot in McGill’s 2-1 win over Queen’s on Friday Night. (Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)
McGill Residences’ hall director restructuring draws criticism Part-time in-rez staff to be replaced by full-time administrators; floor fellows express concern regarding lack of consultation Jessica Fu News Editor Fall 2014 will see the implementation of a new hall director structure in the McGill Residences system. The changes to residence operation mark a shift from the current format, where one part-time director oversees each residence, to a system where full-time administrators each will serve groups of multiple residences. Hall directors currently serve as both faculty or staff at the university, as well as disciplinary officers and supervisors for floor fellows within residences. According to Managing Director of Residences Life and Customer Relations Janice Johnson, the change, announced first in November 2013, comes as a result of students’ increasing needs and a difficulty retaining directors.
“One of the really great advances of our age is that there’s been so much improvement in mental health support for people,” Johnson said. “So students are coming to McGill—and not just residences—with greater needs around support than they have in the past.” Since current hall director positions are part-time, switching to full-time directors would help adapt to increasing needs, according to Johnson. “We have more behavioral issues in residences, we have more discipline cases in residences,” Johnson said. “There is more intervention required in residences [....] That sucks up a lot of hall directors’ time.” The new model is currently being piloted in a group of three residences—one director is responsible for Royal Victoria College (RVC), Carrefour Sherbrooke, and Varcity515. Next
year, the model will be expanded to all residences. Sean Reginio, a floor fellow at RVC since Fall 2011, said he has experienced both the old and new models. “When a director is responsible for three buildings, the chance that an emergency is going to occur on a Saturday night in more than one building is quite high,” Reginio said. “So it leaves floor fellows in a really vulnerable position where they won’t have that base support.” Reginio also reported that the relationship between floor fellows and hall directors has become less personal since the transition. “Under the current model, one director has to bond with upwards of 20 floor fellows instead of five, six, or seven,” he said. “So it makes it really difficult to bond within your own team and with the director, and that sets
the precedent for the entire year, making it harder for the floor fellow to reach out to that director.” The new model was developed by Johnson in consultation with current Hall Director and Senior Advisor on Residence Life Programs Ria Rombough, and other colleagues at conferences on student housing. Although it has been approved by both Deputy Provost (Student Living and Learning) Ollivier Dyens and Provost Anthony Masi, members of the McGill residences community have expressed concern regarding a lack of consultation in making the change. “[We were notified] the week before finals started,” said one floor fellow, who asked to remain anonymous. “It was a deliberate decision to exclude floor fellows from consultation until a decision was made [….] The only reasonable way to justify why they wouldn’t want our feedback
is either because they legitimately think it’s not valuable [... or] that they wanted to ignore the information that we were going to bring to the table in their decision.” According to Reginio, consultation with floor fellows could have led to the consideration of other options that would not have resulted in removal of the hall director position. “If we’re having issues recruiting directors, instead of proposing that we change the director model, maybe we should improve on recruitment tactics,” Reginio said. “Many floor fellows have gotten the impression that our recruitment tactics for directors are really, really lacking, and not very effective.” In the reorganized model, McGill faculty would no longer have the opportunity to serve as See “Hall director” on p. 4