McGill Tribune Vol. 32 Issue 7

Page 1

TRIBUNE

THE Mcgill

Published by the Tribune Publication Society

Martlet volleyball P 18 earthquake hunt p8

right to play P 11 pukatawagan P 12

curiosity delivers

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

@mcgill_tribune ­ • www. mcgilltribune.com ­

Volume No. 32 Issue No. 7

SSMU fall General Assembly marked by low turnout

Assembly passes two motions before losing quorum; motions to be ratified through online voting system Erica Friesen News Editor

Students vote in the SSMU General Assembly. (Sam Reynolds / McGill Tribune)

Despite efforts to make the General Assembly (GA) of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) on Oct. 15 more accessible to students, the assembly lost quorum after passing two motions. The revamped GA showcased several new features, including the introduction of online ratification. Although motions still need to be passed by the assembly, they must now also be ratified through an online vote that represents at least 10 per cent of SSMU’s constituent. Voting on yesterday’s motions will be open for seven days, from Oct. 16 to Oct. 23. Results will be announced on the last day at 5 p.m. The GA was also live-streamed, and featured a “mood watcher,” to whom students could send text messages anonymously if the debate

made them feel uncomfortable, or if they thought the debate was moving in an unproductive direction. The use of clickers to speed up voting was among the intended reforms pioneered by the SSMU executives. However, SSMU President Josh Redel said that the order for clickers fell through. SSMU will be looking into a text and mobile appbased audience engagement system for the next GA. Despite the alterations, the GA lost quorum after voting on just two motions. However, Redel said he was pleased with the GA, and thought the mood watcher and use of social media were effective. “[Low participation] might just be a reality of McGill,” Redel said. “I’m intrigued to know how much [improvements to the GA] could change that culture, [but] I think people enjoyed this, and hopefully See “SSMU GA” on p. 2

Manfredi releases long-awaited report on the Open Forum Report provides summary of discussion on free expression, Manfredi offers three recommendations for further steps Bea Britneff News Editor On Oct. 10, McGill Principal and Vice-Chancellor Heather Munroe-Blum announced the release of Dean of Arts Christopher Manfredi’s Report on the Open Forum on Free Expression and Peaceful Assembly. Manfredi’s concluding recommendations include the clarification of several clauses in the Code of Student Conduct, the revision of the provisional protocol, and a review of McGill Security’s training program. Munroe-Blum mandated the series of open fora following Dean of Law Daniel Jutras’ report on the events of Nov. 10, 2011, when an occupation of the James Administration Building ended with riot police dispersing and pepper-spraying stu-

dents on campus. The open fora were intended to provide students, faculty, non-academic staff, and senior administration with an opportunity to engage in dialogue about campus issues, including freedom of assembly on campus, and the limits of this freedom. Four Open Forum sessions took place between March 1 and May 2 of this year. Manfredi’s report on the Open Forum, which can be accessed online through the Open Forum blog, described the key issues that constituted the focus of the discussions— as well as the different opinions expressed regarding these issues. Early in his report, Manfredi compared McGill’s policies, protections, and regulations to several Canadian and American universi-

ties and institutions. The points of comparison include student codes of conduct, freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, and the disruption of meetings. Manfredi found that several of the institutions possess specific policies regarding freedom of speech and expression, and that the code of student conduct for each institution defines “prohibited behaviour” and establishes “disciplinary procedures for investigating … and sanctioning behaviour contrary to the Code.” “Universities place limits on the rights to assembly and expression,” Manfredi concluded. “Assemblies and demonstrations must be ‘peaceful’ or ‘lawful’ to enjoy any protection at all. Beyond this, even assemblies or demonstrations that fall within ordinary definitions

of these qualifying terms are usually prohibited if they otherwise disrupt normal institutional activities.” In his section on free expression, Manfredi stated that there was much debate about “expressive activities” such as protests, demonstrations, and occupations, and that many participants commented on the limited responsiveness of the McGill administration to “dissenting voices.” With regards to peaceful assembly, Manfredi said that much of the discussion involved “the question of how much, where, and with what consequences disruptive activity can legitimately take place.” Manfredi noted that all participants in the Open Forum agreed that McGill should be a violence-free zone. However, other opinions ranged

from the belief that peaceful assembly is a form of disruption—even in the absence of violence—and should not be tolerated, to the view that disruptions on campus should be allowed in all circumstances. “The Open Forum discussions indicate that the university community accepts the necessity of limits, and that most recognize that the peaceful/non-peaceful line is more complicated than a simple distinction between violent and non-violent,” Manfredi concluded. “McGill’s Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures and its Charter of Student Rights currently inadequately define the limits to acceptable protest.” Manfredi closed his report with See “Manfredi” on p. 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
McGill Tribune Vol. 32 Issue 7 by The Tribune - Issuu