TRIBUNE
THE Mcgill
Published by the Tribune Publication Society
redmen football P 20 ovarian cancer p9
Rowling's new book p 17 mcgill in the 50s p 10
curiosity delivers
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
@mcgill_tribune • www. mcgilltribune.com
Volume No. 32 Issue No. 6
Justin Trudeau announces Liberal Party leadership bid
Launch speech recognizes Canadian diversity and necessity for middle class growth, rules out coalition possibility Carolina Millán Ronchetti Managing Editor
Justin Trudeau announces his leadership bid at a press conference. (Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)
Justin Trudeau is officially in the race to lead the Liberal Party of Canada. Following weeks of speculation, the eldest son of former Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau announced his candidacy at a rally of several hundred supporters in his home riding of Papineau. Trudeau’s official declaration, however, preceded the rally in the form of a YouTube video that amassed over 21,600 views in 16 hours. The Liberal Party has been under the stewardship of interim leader Bob Rae since the resignation of its previous leader, Michael Ignatieff. Ignatieff resigned following the May 2011 federal election, in which the Liberal Party won the lowest seat count in its history. “We need to prove that we Liberals have learned from the past, but that we are 100 per cent focused on the future—and not the future of the party, the future of this country,” Trudeau said at the rally. Trudeau’s address praised Ca-
nadian diversity and emphasized the need to strengthen and empower the middle class in order to jump start the economy and foster community relations. He also criticized the approaches of other major federal parties. “What is the response from the NDP? To sow regional resentment, and blame the successful. The Conservative answer? Privilege one sector over all others, and promise that wealth will trickle down eventually,” Trudeau said. “Both are tidy ideological answers to complex and difficult questions. The only thing they have in common is that they are both equally wrong.” Trudeau also acknowledged the issue of Quebec nationalism. In his speech, he emphasized the need for national unity. “Quebeckers have always chosen Canada because we know it is the land of our ancestors, who built this country from east to west,” Trudeau said. “They were here to write the first chapters of the great Canadian history of courage, libSee “Trudeau” on p. 2
Judicial Board hears case on AUS Winter Referendum period Respondents Calver and Cheng do not attend the hearing, Bangs claims violations compromised referendum results Erica Friesen News Editor On Oct. 2, the Judicial Board (J-Board) of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) heard the case of Bangs vs. Calver and Cheng, regarding the results of last winter’s referendum period for the Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS). The J-Board has 15 days to deliver a verdict on the case. Petitioner Chris Bangs has asked the J-Board to invalidate two
referendum questions for which he was the chair of the ‘No’ committee—“Online Ratification for the decisions of the AUS General Assembly” and “Amending the Constitution.” The respondents are former AUS President Jade Calver and former Chief Returning Officer of Elections AUS Victor Cheng. J-Board hearings are intended to allow the justices an opportunity to hear and question both parties. Prior to the hearing, however, the respondents informed members of the J-Board that they did not wish
to appear in this case, and consequently, would not attend the hearing. Neither party provided justification, thereby forfeiting their right to make submissions or arguments. Nevertheless, the hearing continued as scheduled. “The plaintiff still has a burden of proof,” Chief Justice of the J-Board Joel Kwan explained. “[Bangs] still has to convince the board that the allegations are prevalent enough to make the conclusion that the petitioner is looking for.” Bangs’ case for invalidating
the two motions rests on the respondents’ alleged violations of six sections of AUS by-laws during last winter’s special referenda period. These include items concerning passing motions in AUS Council, translating the motions into French, and publicizing the polling times and location. “The fact that the AUS failed to uphold its own by-laws is really disturbing for me,” Bangs said. “The fact that so many violations occurred in such a short amount of time is truly problematic.”
In particular, Bangs pointed to the AUS’ failure to distribute the amended version of the motions’ texts and their restriction of the campaigning period by four days, which he says could have affected the way students voted. “These [motions] are things that really should be discussed, and change the fundamental way that [the AUS] is run,” Bangs said. “There’s really a lot of value in discussion.” See “J-Board” on p. 2