Skip to main content

Organic Broadcaster | September 2020 | Volume 28, Issue 5

Page 1

Organic No-Till

Organic Diet Results

Transition Tips

Page 5

Page 7

Page 10

TM

Volume 28 | Number 5

Midwest Organic & Sustainable Education Service

Proposed rule to strengthen organic enforcement contains hits, misses; comments needed

Processors, farmers struggle with pandemic-fueled demand for locally raised meat

By Alice Runde & Abby Youngblood

By Rachel Henderson

The USDA National Organic Program (NOP) released the long-awaited “Strengthening Organic Enforcement (SOE) Proposed Rule” last month. This rule is meant to implement provisions from the 2018 Farm Bill, along with multiple recommendations from the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), with the goal to update and modernize the organic regulations to strengthen oversight and enforcement to reduce fraud in the organic marketplace. This is by far the most extensive regulatory change in organic standards since the publication of the USDA organic regulations 20 years ago. Regulations are much needed as organic sales have risen to more than $55 billion annually in the U.S., according to the latest survey from the Organic Trade Association. With this rise in demand, supply chains have become more complex, with many uncertified entities handling organic products without direct oversight from the NOP, thus increasing the potential for fraud. The 13 provisions in this rule and their intention are listed below, along with NOC’s analysis of the significant improvements the rule achieves and an outline of some of the shortfalls and opportunities for this rule. The NOP has encouraged the organic community to submit comments by Oct. 5, 2020, to help design a rule that meets its purpose.

Jake Sailer had never seen anything like what happened this spring. Sailer, who owns an independent meat processing facility near Spring Valley, Wisconsin, was blown away by the sudden demand for local meat when COVID-19 started to force businesses to close and people to stay home. Many Consumers worried about food shortages during the pandemic are filling their freezers people, worried about the with meat, creating opportunity as well as issues for small-scale livestock producers. future, wanted to fill their Photo by Rachel Henderson freezers with locally raised meet that demand. When I spoke to Sailer in August, meat. As with toilet paper and hand sanitizer, the run he was just starting to get caught up but said he on meat spiraled into a panic. expects another big run this fall, the season when Then, “the virus got into bigger packing plants, many small-scale farmers bring in their animals. which shut them down, which put the stress on the While this year has been extreme for meat procesfarmers,” Sailer explained. “Small processors stepped sors across the country, it could also be seen as a up to the plate.” He personally worked with a local heightened scenario of a growing trend. As the local farmer to help him sell 400 hogs in 11 days. But that resulted in a processing backlog. His facility, and many food movement grows, consumers want to know where their meat comes from. They want to know their like it, lacked any extra capacity to take on these new farmers and support a style of farming that matches customers and soon had a long waiting list. That story played out all over the country. In states their values. They want animals that have been raised on pasture, basked in sunshine, rooted under trees, where small farms make up a large portion of the had space to run, and ended their lives with just one rural economy—states like Wisconsin, Minnesota, bad day. Pennsylvania—meat processors struggled to safely

Provisions 1. Reduce the types of uncertified entities in the organic supply chain that operate without USDA oversight—including importers, brokers, and traders of organic products. This will safeguard organic product integrity and improve traceability. 2. Require the use of NOP Import Certificates, or equivalent data, for all organic products entering the United States. This proposed change will expand the use of NOP Import Certificates to all organic products imported into the U.S., improving the oversight and traceability of imported organic products. 3. Clarify the NOP’s authority to oversee certification activities, including the authority to act

PO Box 339, Spring Valley, WI 54767

Organic Enforcement continues on 8

September | October 2020

Meat Processing continues on 6

Act offers path toward climate-resilient farming By Cristel Zoebisch

Farmers and ranchers are already feeling the impacts of the climate crisis, dealing with more erratic and severe weather events that affect their livelihoods. However, they are uniquely positioned to help combat these threats by improving the health of their soils through implementation of climate stewardship practices that enhance their resilience to the impacts of a changing climate. Collectively, farmers and ranchers working to restore, maintain, and improve soil health can significantly contribute to our nation’s climate mitigation efforts by using soil health practices that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and store atmospheric carbon in the soil. Soil health management practices and systems can create carbon sinks, increase waterholding capacity, and improve recycling of nitrogen by crops. The Agriculture Resilience Act (ARA), introduced by Representative Pingree (D-ME) earlier this year, recognizes the importance of soil health and encourages farmers and ranchers to pull carbon out of the air and into their soils. The bill includes specific soil health and research goals accompanied by legislative proposals to support widespread adoption of stewardship practices to help agriculture reach its climatemitigating potential. Proven soil-health-building practices include diverse, resource-conserving crop rotations, cover crops, conservation tillage, perennialization of highly erodible land, agroforestry, composting, organic agriculture, and advanced grazing management. The ARA would provide financial and technical assistance to help farmers and ranchers implement these soil health practices, thereby increasing profitability and enhancing their operations’ resilience to climate stresses. This is the second article in the Organic Broadcaster summarizing the National Sustainable Agriculture

Coalition’s (NSAC) blog series covering various provisions in the ARA. The three blogs covered in this article highlight proposed changes to the country’s primary working lands conservation programs, enhancements for two U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) research programs, and a provision to support state-level soil health efforts.

Working Lands Conservation Programs The fourth blog in the series focused on proposed changes to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), and was co-authored by Michael Happ, NSAC Conservation Policy Specialist. A major increase in support for working lands conservation programs is critical for agriculture to reach the goal of net zero by 2040 outlined in the ARA. Federal policy and resources need to support the transition of agriculture to more climate-friendly ways of farming. Without increased investment in conservation agriculture by the federal government, farmers and ranchers will not have the tools and resources to meaningfully participate and contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. Environmental Quality Incentives Program EQIP offers farmers and ranchers financial costshare and technical assistance to implement conservation practices on working agricultural land. Producers participating in EQIP can install or implement structural, vegetative, and management practices like improving irrigation efficiency, restoring pasture, or improving nutrient management. The ARA would enhance EQIP’s ability to address climate change by adding GHG emissions reduction Agriculture Resilience Act continues on 12


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Organic Broadcaster | September 2020 | Volume 28, Issue 5 by marbleseed - Issuu