Manitoba Beef Producers E-Newsletter: September 26/2025 by ManitobaBeefProducers

E-Newsletter

mbp took part in agriculture in the classroom - manitoba's amazing agriculture adventure at the bruce d. campbell farm and food discovery centre between sept. 23-26. directors and staff welcomed hundreds of students where together they explored the world of agriculture as well as the local beef industry.

a special thank you to sigga and steina vigfusson of rock ridge ranch in lundar for supplying the cow-calf pair. (photo credit: mbfi)

In this edition...

September 26, 2025

Reminder

Please note that the date for the District 10 meeting – which was advertised in the September edition of Cattle Country as taking place on October 16 – was changed due to a scheduling conﬂict after the newspaper went to print. It is now taking place on October 14 instead.

Highlights

You

4:30 pm start time

DISTRICT MEETING SCHEDULE

October 14 - District 10 Director: Mike Duguid Arborg-Bifrost Community Centre (Arborg)

October 15 - District 4 Director: Byron Falk New Horizon Senior Centre (Grunthal)

October 21 - District 2 Director: Mark Schram Floyd & Ethel Cudmore Hall (Crystal City)

October 23 - District 8 Director: Matthew Atkinson Neepawa Legion

Please note that the date for the District 10 meeting – which was advertised in the September CattleCountryas taking place on October 16 – was changed due to a scheduling conflict after the newspaper went to print. It is now taking place on October 14 instead.

October 27 - District 12 Director: Mark Good Ste. Rose du Lac Community Hall

October 28 - District 14 Director: Dale Cazakoff Swan River Elks Hall

November 3 - District 6 Director: Brian English Oak Lake Community Hall

November 4 - All Districts VIRTUAL MEETING - 7:00 pm

Adjustments Made to Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership Sustainable Agriculture Manitoba Program re: BMP 4700: 2025 Special Intake – Livestock Water Supply

Beef producers: Please be aware that adjustments have been made to the SCAP Sustainable Agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Manitoba program related to the special intake for livestock water supply projects. The following information is from Manitoba Agriculture. Manitoba Beef Producers had been advocating for program changes and continues to engage with the provincial government about drought-related matters.

The 2025 Special Intake: Livestock Water Supply intake supports livestock producers in accessing new or expanding existing water supplies during prolonged periods of dry conditions.

Updates to the Sustainable Agriculture Manitoba (SAM) BMP 4700: 2025 Special Intake - Livestock Water Supply were made to expand eligible areas as well as include additional eligible expenses, notably aeration systems for dugouts.

Applications will be accepted on a first-come, firstserved basis until available funding is allocated. Program guidelines are new for this intake. Please review carefully to ensure eligibility before applying.

Intake Information

The intake for this program is currently open; funding requests will be accepted on a first-come, first-served basis from August 21, 2025, until available funding has been allocated.

Eligible Applicants

This intake is exclusively for livestock producers in specific areas impacted by dry conditions. To be eligible, livestock producers must:

• Manage agricultural land used to produce agricultural products. Hobby farms are not eligible.

• Own land where the project will be executed or have permission from the landowner to execute the project.

• Have a Manitoba Premises Identification number.

• Have a valid Statement of Completion for an Environmental Farm Plan at time of project claim.

The land location(s) for the project must be within a Municipality, Northern Affairs Community or First Nation:

• Map and List of Eligible Areas See the updated map in this edition of the MBP enewsletter as well.

If you are unsure of your eligibility, please contact us at agriculture@gov.mb.ca or 1-800-811-4411.

Beneficial Management Practice (BMP) Summary Establish new or expand existing water supply for agricultural use by installing infrastructure.

• Wells: drilling new or deepening/extending existing, plus test hole drilling, screening, casing, well caps, etc.

• Dugouts: constructing new or rehabilitating existing dugouts, aeration systems

• Associated components and actions to bring water to the surface: purchase and installation of pipe, plumbing, electrical, solar and wind power, trenching, earthworks, pump and pressure systems, etc.

• Permanent pipeline development: pipelines below the frost line OR shallow/above ground pipelines (pipelines above the frost line) that can be winterized, pipe, plumbing materials, trenching, earthworks, etc.

Eligible Expenses

The following type of expenses are eligible for funding:

Adjustments Made to Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership Sustainable Agriculture Manitoba Program

re: BMP 4700: 2025 Special

Intake – Livestock Water Supply

• Incremental Personal Labour

• Incremental Personal Equipment Use

• Subcontracted Services

• Professional Fees

• Capital Assets and Equipment

• Equipment Rental

• Materials and Supplies

Review the Program Guide for complete details on eligible and ineligible expenses.

Project Timeline

• All projects shall start April 1, 2025, or later.

• Project activities and all reports must be completed by December 12, 2025.

Cost Share Funding

• BMP 4700 has a cost share ratio of 50 per cent government, 50 per cent applicant, and a BMP funding cap of $15,000 per applicant.

• Producers that were previously approved for Sustainable Agriculture Manitoba - BMP 4700 are eligible for up to an additional $15,000 under the 2025 Special IntakeLivestock Water Supply for new project

For application forms, the program guide, frequently asked questions, etc. go to: https://www.gov.mb.ca/scap/climatechange/sustai nableagr/livestock-water-supply.html

Note: The updated frequently asked questions document is also in this edition of the e-newsletter.

Eligible Regions for BMP 4700: 2025 Special Intake – Livestock Water Supply Regions in Manitoba that received significantly less precipitation than normal as of July 27, 2025 – per Manitoba Ag Weather Program data.

Eligible Municipalities

1. Alexander

2. Alonsa

3. Armstrong

4. Bifrost-Riverton

5. Brokenhead

6. Cartier

7. Clanwilliam-Erickson

8. Coldwell

9. Dauphin

10. Dufferin

11. East St. Paul

12. Ellice-Archie

13. Ethelbert

14. Fisher

15. Gilbert Plains

16. Gimli

17. Glenella-Lansdowne

18. Grahamdale

19. Grandview

20. Grey

21. Hamiota

22. Hanover

23. Harrison Park

24. Headingly

25. Hillsburg-Roblin-Shell River

26. Kelsey

27. La Broquerie

28. Lac du Bonnet

29. Lakeshore

30. Macdonald

31. McCreary

32. Minitonas-Bowsman

33. Minto-Odanah

34. Morris

Eligible Northern Affairs Communities and First Nations

Northern Affairs

Communities:

1. Barrows

2. Camperville

3. Crane River

4. Dallas/Red Rose

5. Dawson Bay

6. Duck Bay

7. Fisher Bay

8. Harwill

9. Homebrook-Peonan Point

10. Mallard

11. Meadow Portage

12. National Mills

13. Pelican Rapids

14. Red Deer Lake

15. Rock Ridge

16. Spence Lake

17. Waterhen

18. Baden

19. Salt Point

First Nations:

20. Anishinaabe Aki

35. Mossey River

36. Mountain

37. Norfolk Treherne

38. North Norfolk

39. Oakview

40. Portage la Prairie

41. Prairie View

42. Reynolds

43. Riding Mountain West

44. Ritchot

45. Riverdale

46. Rockwood

47. Rosedale

48. Rossburn

49. Rosser

50. Russel-Binscarth

51. Souris-Glenwood

21. Antler Corner Indian Reserve

22. Birch Landing

23. Birdtail Creek

24. Birdtail Hay Lands

25. Birdtail Sioux Dakota Nation Indian Reserve

26. Bon Esp

27. Bottle Lake

28. Brokenhead

29. Clear Lake

30. Crane River

31. Dakota Plains

32. Dakota Tipi

33. Dog Creek

34. Ebb and Flow

35. Fairford

36. Fisher River

37. Fort Alexander

38. Gambler

39. Indian Gardens

40. Keeseekoowenin

52. Springﬁeld

53. St. Andrews

54. St. Clements

55. St. Francois Xavier

56. St. Laurent

57. Ste. Anne

58. Ste. Rose

59. Swan Valley West

60. Tache

61. Victoria Beach

62. West Interlake

63. West St. Paul

64. Westlake-Gladstone

65. Whitehead

66. Whitemouth

67. Woodlands

68. Yellowhead

41. Little Saskatchewan

42. Long Plain

43. Na-Sha-Ke-Penais

44. Naawi-Oodena

45. Obushkudayang Indian Reserve

46. Opaskwayak Cree Nation

47. Peguis

48. Pine Creek

49. Rolling River First Nation

50. Root Lake Beach Ridge Site

51. Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation Indian Reserve

52. Sandy Bay

53. Sapotaweyak Cree Nation

54. Sioux Valley Dakota Nation

55. Swan Lake

56. The Narrows

57. Tootinaowaziibeeng Treaty Reserve

58. Waywayseecappo First Nation

59. Wuskwi Sipihk

SustainableAgriculture Manitoba Program BMP

4700: 2025 Special Intake – Livestock Water Supply

Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Who is eligible?

A. This intake is for livestock producers experiencing water supply shortages caused by dry conditions in specific eligible areas across agri-Manitoba.

The land location(s) for the project must be within an eligible Municipality, Northern Affairs Community or First Nation. A map and list of eligible regions can be found on the program webpage

If you are unsure of your eligibility, contact us at agriculture@gov.mb.ca or 1-800-811-4411.

Q. Has eligibility been updated since this special intake was announced?

A: Yes, there have been two updates to the program:

- The eligible regions have been expanded; and - Aeration systems are now an eligible expense.

Please refer to the program webpage and guide for further details.

Q. How do I apply?

A: Application forms and program details can be found on the Special Intake webpage at BMP 4700: 2025 Special Intake. Applications are accepted on a first come, first serve basis, reviewed weekly and subject to the eligibility of submitted expenses and available funding. For eligibility criteria, refer to the BMP 4700: 2025 Special Intake – Livestock Water Supply Program Guide.

Q. What is the cost share and cap?

BMP 4700: 2025 Special Intake – Livestock Water Supply has a cost share ratio of 50 per cent government, 50 per cent applicant, and a BMP funding cap of $15,000 per applicant.

Q. Can I apply more than once?

Eligible applicants may submit one (1) application for this intake, which may include multiple locations or projects within the same application. Regardless of the number of locations included in an application, the total funding cap will remain at $15,000.

Q. If I have already completed a water supply project, am I eligible?

A: Any projects for water supply occurring after April 1, 2025, are eligible. Producers that were previously approved for Sustainable Agriculture Manitoba BMP 4700 Water Supply are eligible for up to an additional $15,000 under the 2025 Special Intake – Livestock Water Supply for new projects

Q. When do I have to complete my project by?

A: Projects must be completed and claims submitted by December 12, 2025.

Q. Do I need a valid Environmental Farm Plan Statement of Completion?

A: You may submit an application without a valid Statement of Completion; however, you will be required to have one when you submit the claim to be reimbursed. To complete your Environmental Farm Plan, please visit https://online.manitobaefp.ca/.

Q. Are confined livestock operations eligible?

A: Yes All livestock operations in need of water are eligible to apply provided they are located within the eligible areas.

Q. Do I have to dig a dugout to a specific size?

A: All dugout work, including new construction or rehabilitation of an existing location, should follow the Dugout Construction Guidelines. See Appendix A below.

Q. Can I drill a new well in my yard?

A: Drilling a well in a farmyard is eligible if it will be used for watering livestock and is the most cost-efficient means of doing so.

Q. Do I need any permits?

A: Applicants must meet all regulatory requirements. This may include:

- a water rights license from Environment and Climate Change, which is required for all livestock operations extracting more than 25,000 litres (25m3 or 5,499 Imperial gallons) per day. If developing a new water source, a permit must be obtained in advance of work beginning.

- approvals from the rural municipality or Crown.

- any other standards or approvals as required by law.

- For details on regulatory requirements, please visit: Licensing, Regulation and Policy, Manitoba government Groundwater and Wells, Manitoba government Drainage & Water Control, Manitoba government

Q. Can I pipe water from an existing water source into a dugout that has run dry?

A: No. Piping or hauling from a water source (well, dugout or wetland) into a dugout that has run dry is not eligible. However, piping from a water source to an alternate watering system is eligible.

Q. How deep does the pipeline need to be?

A: Shallow or above-ground pipelines (including those above the frost line) that cannot be winterized are ineligible. Projects must be for permanent solutions only. Summer pasture pipelines permanently installed underground and those which are able to be winterized before freezing, are eligible.

Q. Can I apply for a project on a pasture that I rent?

A: Yes. Either the landowner or renter can apply. If the renter applies, they must identify the landowner and provide contact information as part of the project description. This includes pasture on Crown Land.

Q. If I have more questions, who can I contact?

A: Livestock producers can call the toll-free line 1-800-811-4411 or send an email to Sustainable CAP - Program Administration at agriculture@gov.mb.ca

Other related information

- Dugout Construction Guideline – see Appendix A below

- Program Guide

- Program Webpage

- Map and list of eligible regions

- Licensing, Regulation and Policy, Manitoba government

- Groundwater and Wells, Manitoba government

- Drainage & Water Control, Manitoba government

Appendix A

Livestock Dugout Construction Guidelines

- Exclusion fencing is recommended but not required:

• Exclusion fencing ensures that livestock are restricted from direct access to the dugout, protecting against manure contaminated runoff and drowning.

• Exclusion fencing should be a minimum of 15m (50’) from the edge of the dugout.

- Dugout location:

• The dugout should be far enough away from any stream, river or creek as to not compromise bank stability or impact the riparian area.

- Dugout construction:

• End slopes and side slopes should be no steeper than 1.5:1.

• Dugout edge should be stabilized (by excavator) during construction.

- Dugout sizing:

• In order to build resilience into your farm, dugouts should be sized for drought proof standards by accounting for more than one season’s worth of water.

• Dimensions can be calculated using this Dugout Volume Calculator

- Alternate water system components:

• Troughs / tanks should supply a minimum of one day’s water usage based on 15 imp gal/ head/day

Manitoba Government Expands Agricultural Services With New MASC Offices In Virden And Shoal Lake

(September 19, 2025 Province of Manitoba News Release) The Manitoba government is strengthening support for farmers and rural communities with two new Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation (MASC) offices in Virden and Shoal Lake, Agriculture Minister Ron Kostyshyn announced today.

“Our government is committed to ensuring Westman farmers have the tools and support they need to succeed after the previous government closed these offices,” said Kostyshyn. “By opening new MASC offices in Virden and Shoal Lake, we are making it easier for producers to access programs and services closer to home, where they are needed most.”

The new offices will improve access to MASC programs and services, providing more convenient, in-person support for crop insurance, lending and other key resources, the minister said.

MASC plays a vital role in supporting the province’s agriculture sector through risk

management, financing, and advisory services, noted the minister, adding that the new locations are part of the Manitoba government’s ongoing efforts to strengthen rural communities.

“The Town of Virden is so pleased to welcome the MASC offices back,” said Mayor Tina Williams, Town of Virden. “The value of having a local office for our surrounding farm communities cannot be overstated.”

The Virden and Shoal Lake offices are now open to serve 650 to 700 farmers and agri-businesses in the surrounding regions. Each new service centre is staffed by four full-time employees and a team of insurance adjustors.

MASC now has 12 service centres across the province providing access to agricultural insurance, lending and other agricultural programs and services.

For more information on MASC programs and services, visit www.masc.mb.ca.

Raising or Purchasing Replacement Heifers?

When selecting replacement heifers, the value for both retained and purchased replacements generally depends on:

➢ Genetic and phenotypical compatibility with herd mates

➢ Management compatibility with the operation’s production system (calving and weaning time, winter feeding practices)

➢ Productivity that meets both current and future expectations (open rate, culling rate, death loss)

➢ Longevity reflecting the replacement heifer’s ability to stay in the herd as a productive unit

➢ Financial standing specifically debt related to purchases and/or forgone income from retaining heifers with implications on cash flow

When deciding whether to retain or purchase replacements, producers need to know their:

1. Annual cost of production per cow

2. Average cost of a replacement heifer (raised or purchased)

What is the COP Network?

The Canadian Cow-calf Cost of Production Network (COP Network) uses standardized data collection which allows for comparison both within and between provinces, and internationally Since launching in 2021, the COP Network has collected data from over 235 producers contributing to 64 cow-calf benchmark farms that represent various production systems. Each benchmark is based on data from 3-7 producers. Data collection occurs every 5 years with annual indexing of input and output prices, as well as crop and forage yields, in subsequent years. Individual benchmark farm summaries, can be found at: https://canfax.ca/resources/cost-ofproduction/cop-results.html

3. Cow replacement rates including open rates, culls and death loss as a measure of average cow longevity

There is tremendous variability within the cow-calf sector for all three of these metrics resulting in equal variability in willingness to pay for breeding stock. Understanding your own operation is key to knowing which choice best suits your specific goals.

The cost of replacement heifers has long-term implications for a cow-calf producer’s cost structure, setting them up for success or not during the next phase of the cattle cycle.

In general, operations with higher replacement rates also face higher replacement costs, although exceptions do exist. Achieving a balance between managing herd age, maintaining productivity, and controlling replacement costs is essential to maximizing profitability.

To Raise or Purchase?

The Alberta bred heifer market tracks closely with average cost of raising a replacement heifer. The question becomes, are you a high or low-cost producer of replacement heifers? Some operations are low-cost and it will always make sense for them to retain their own. For high-cost producers, there is potential of reducing herd costs by purchasing heifers that are suitable to your environment and management. Finding a suitable source for purchased heifers is key to making that a viable option for many producers.

In 2024, the average cost of raising a replacement heifer across the 64 benchmark farms was $3,315/heifer - 10% below the average Alberta bred heifer price of $3,697/heifer, recognizing that the bred heifer market took off in the fourth quarter as demand increased.

In previous years, the estimated cost of raising replacement heifers was higher than the market price of Alberta bred heifers, with differences ranging from 2-7% in 2021 and 2023 but jumping to 21% in 2022. The higher cost estimates from the COP Network were due to rising input and opportunity costs while demand for bred heifers in the market was subdued due to weather conditions. As forage availability improves and more cow-calf producers look to restock, the bred female market is expected to be strong with much higher prices.

Homegrown Heifers:

▪ Known genetics, adapted to environment and management

▪ Slower rebuild, limited by numbers

▪ Opportunity cost of not selling calves

Purchased Heifers:

▪ Opportunity to introduce new genetics that can perform in your environment and under similar management

▪ Faster rebuild, supporting economies of scale and COP

▪ Biosecurity measures to protect the herd are essential

Rebuilding after drought culling

A 2022 analysis of herd rebuilding after drought evaluated rebuilding from within the herd versus purchasing on four different culling levels (regular, 25%, 50% and 75%). Producers have been impacted by drought to varying degrees, however economies of scale is a critical aspect of cost structure with drought culled herds spreading overheads over fewer numbers. This is a driver behind the desire to get back to the ideal herd size once forage and feed resources become available. In addition, there was concern about selling at low prices during drought and buying high.

Retention rates had to be adjusted to avoid prolonged periods of equity drain due to lost economies of scale and not optimizing pasture resources.

Purchasing heifers allowed farms to regain economies of scale faster when culling rates had been 50% or higher. In most cases, purchasing heifers meant taking on debt, requiring good financial status and a strong relationship with financial institutions. Cash flow deficits were more severe when purchasing heifers as was interest paid by the whole farm (1% higher in the 25% culling scenario, 18% higher with 50% culling and 21% higher with the 75% culling scenario). Cash flow deficits indicated that this strategy is more risky, but more profitable, with higher culling rates (e.g. 75%) in order to regain economies of scale faster.

➢ At a 25% culling rate rebuilding from own heifers was more profitable for 16 out of 17 farms.

➢ At a 50% culling rate rebuilding from own heifers was more profitable for 14 out of 17 farms.

➢ At a 75% culling rate rebuilding with purchased heifers was more profitable for 15 out of 17 farms.

Check out the Drought Rebuilding Strategies Full Report.

Raising Replacement heifers

Using 2024 data from 64 benchmark farms in the COP Network, total costs included cash (feed, land, animal purchases, machinery repairs, labour, etc.), depreciation and opportunity costs (foregone revenue from not selling the calf) These costs were associated with raising replacement heifers from weaning until pregnancy check in the fall of the following year, covering approximately 12 months with one winterfeeding and one summer-grazing period.1

High and low-cost producers of replacement heifers: Which one you are?

The average total cost of raising a replacement heifer retained in 2024 was estimated at $3,315/heifer, including cash costs, depreciation, and opportunity costs When opportunity costs for land, labour, and capital are excluded, the average cost is $2,966/heifer, with a range of $2,073 to $3,810

Total Cost of Raising a Replacement Heifer, 2024

$/heifer

$4,500

$4,000

$3,500

$3,000

$2,500

$2,000

$1,500

$5,000 MT-5AB-5SK-8aSK-7MB-3bMB-3aSK-8bMB-2MT-3MT-4QC-2LL_03BC-3SK-13MB-1SKAB-1SK-9BC-5AB-11AB-9SK-1aMB-4ONMB-1SK-1bMT-1BC-4LL_05AB-2QC-1AB-1BC-1AB-10LL_06LL_04AB-3QC-7SK-3BC-6BC-2ON-2SK-6AB-6ON-3AB-14QC-4LL_01SK-11aSK-11bON-1AB-8SK-10QC-6AB-12SK-4AB-4AB-13SK-12MT-6LL_02MT-2SK-5BC-7

1 For more details see https://canfax.ca/uploads/COP-Analysis/12_Cost_of_Raising_Replacement_Heifers.pdf

As shown in the graph above, the data is categorized into three groups based on the total cost of raising a replacement heifer: Low (orange bars), Medium (blue bars), and High (grey bars) heifer cost groups, with 20 to 21 benchmarks in each group. The Low group’s heifer costs averaged $2,846/heifer, the Medium group at $3,279/heifer, and the High group at $3,820/heifer. Correspondingly, the annual cow costs (cash and depreciation), based on the 2020-2024 average, are $937 for the Low group, $1,093 for the Medium group, and $1,482 for the High group.

To find out if you are a high or low-cost producer of replacement heifers, check out the BCRC Replacement Heifer Calculator

Driving Factors for Cow Herd Replacement Cost

What drives the differences in replacement cost between the Low, Medium, and High groups? To explore this, we examined three key factors:

• Replacement rates

• Cost of developing heifers (including feed, land, breeding, labour, and other overhead such as machinery, energy and tax)

• Opportunity cost (revenue forgone from not selling heifer calf at weaning)

Replacement Rate

In general, higher replacement rates have higher replacement costs, although some exceptions do exist. A balance between maintaining herd age and productivity while managing replacement costs is key to maximizing profitability.

Replacement rate is primarily influenced by cow open rate, death loss, culling decisions, and overall herd management strategies. It can be viewed as an indicator of the longevity of breeding females.

Generally, a higher replacement rate means that cows are being replaced more frequently and is associated with higher replacement costs because more heifers are needed to maintain herd size. This could lead to higher expenses in raising or purchasing these replacements, but not always

The difference between the low and medium cost group was statistically significant; but the difference between the medium and high-cost group was not statistically significant. This indicates that while higher replacement rates often correspond to higher costs, the relationship may not always hold, depending on other influencing factors. Some farms maintain relatively low replacement costs despite having higher replacement rates. This suggests that other factors such as lower-cost heifer development help offset the potential cost increases associated with a higher replacement rate. Thus, while there is a general relationship between higher replacement rates and higher replacement costs, efficient management practices can help farms mitigate costs associated with higher replacement rates.

Conversely, farms with lower replacement rates do not necessarily experience the lowest replacement costs. In some cases, the expenses incurred to improve open rates or reduce cow death losses may

Average Replacement Rates

outweigh the benefits gained. It is important to consider the optimal replacement rate, rather than focusing solely on minimizing open rates and death losses, to achieve cost efficiency.

Lower Replacement Rates (<13%):

• The result of longer productive lifespans for cows, leading to higher average herd ages and higher Net Present Value (NPV)* for bred heifers

• Herds with lower cull rates can afford higher initial replacement costs because cows generate revenue over a longer time period

Higher Replacement Rates (>13%):

• The result of shorter average production lives of cows, newer genetics in the herd, reducing their cumulative revenue contribution and leading to lower NPV

• Higher turnover rates in the herd increase operational costs due to their increased frequency

*Net Present Value (NPV) is the present value (adjusted for inflation) of expected revenues minus the present value of expenses over the lifetime of the heifer.

Development Cost

Development cost of replacement heifers includes feed, land, breeding, labour, and other overhead such as machinery, fuel and tax.

The difference between the means of the Low and Medium groups, and the Medium and High groups were statistically significant, indicating that development cost is a significant factor influencing replacement costs.

For example, farms SK-8a, SK-8b and AB-1 have managed to keep their replacement costs lower despite having higher replacement rates. This is attributed to their relatively low development costs, which are among the lowest of all benchmark farms. Conversely, farms LL-2 and MT-6, despite having relatively low replacement rates, experience higher replacement costs per cow due to their higher development costs.

Farms with lower development costs can still maintain lower replacement costs, even with higher replacement rates. However, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to managing heifer development costs. For instance, the lower costs on SK-8a and SK-8b are driven by economies of scale with a large herd size (950 head), while AB-1 (212 head) achieves lower costs through reduced spending on labour, buildings, machinery, and capital.

Opportunity Cost of not Selling Heifer Calves at Weaning

There was no statistical difference between the groups for opportunity costs. This is likely because opportunity costs are more driven by market conditions rather than internal management.

Opportunity Cost (calf), 2024

The Cost of Replacement Heifers impacts, long-term costs structures

Knowing if you are a high or low-cost producer when raising replacement heifers can influence your decision to rebuild from within the herd or with purchased heifers. It can also assist high-cost producers in lowering long-term cost structures on their operations, if they can find a suitable source for bred heifers that match their genetic, phenotypic and management conditions. Many producers are concerned that purchased heifers do not have the same longevity in the herd as homegrown heifers. This also needs to be considered when determining the Net Present Value (NPV) for a purchased heifer.

NPV is the present value (adjusted for inflation) of expected revenues minus the present value of expenses over the lifetime of the heifer. In general, higher productivity equals greater revenue and a higher Net Present Value (NPV) for bred heifers. Lower cost structures and lower replacement rates equal higher NPV. Expectations on calf prices directly impact NPV as well. To find out more about projected prices Subscribe Now to Canfax.

Key Takeaways:

• The Right Animal at the Right Price: Successful producers focus on selecting cows that thrive in their specific operational genetic, phenotypic and management conditions.

• Raising vs. Purchasing: While raising replacements may seem cost-effective, it’s critical to account for all associated costs and compare them with purchased replacements to ensure profitability. High-cost producers may benefit from purchasing bred heifers to lower their cost structure.

• Evaluate Costs Accurately: Know the true costs of raising versus purchasing replacements, considering both short-term expenses and long-term herd impacts.

Canfax is funded by Memberships: Subscribe Now: Scan the QR Code for details how

D Disclaimer / Copyright Notice: Canfax Research Services (CRS) tries to provide quality information, but we make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information. CRS does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of any material contained in our publications. Reproduction and/or electronic transmission of this publication, in whole or in part, is strictly forbidden without written consent from CRS.

MovementMatters

Reporting livestock movements in the Canadian Livestock Tracking System (CLTS) may seem like extra work today, but it makes all the difference when time matters most. Accurate digital records mean faster action during a disease outbreak and a stronger, more resilient industry. It’s not just about compliance. It’s about protecting your herd, your livelihoodandthenextgenerationthatwillcarryyourlegacyforward.

Getting Ready for Proposed Regulatory Changes

What You Need to Know About Movement Reporting in the Canadian Livestock Tracking System (CLTS)

Livestock traceability is essential for protecting animal and human health by limiting the risks and impacts of disease outbreaks, food safety concerns and natural disasters. Canada’s traceability system is built on three pillars: animal identiﬁcation, premises identiﬁcation and movement reporting. However, gaps currently exist, including incomplete species coverage, delayed, inconsistent or lack of movement reporting and outdated record-keeping requirements.

The federal government has proposed changes to Part XV of the Health of Animals Regulations to address gaps in Canada’s traceability system. Key changes include expanding regulated species to goats and cervids, requiring livestock identiﬁcation, the identiﬁcation and registration of premises where livestock are kept or collected, and mandatory reporting of animal movements.

The Canadian Cattle Identiﬁcation Agency (CCIA) is committed to supporting its clients through a smooth transition as proposed regulatory changes approach. CCIA is encouraging both their current regulated species groups (beef cattle, bison and sheep) and pending regulations, cervid and goat groups to begin preparing for the incoming changes and utilizing all the tools available to them in the CLTS, which aim to help reduce the administrative burden of the incoming reporting requirements.

The agency recommends CLTS clients verify their Premises Identiﬁcation Numbers (PIDs) are up to date and registered through their provincial PID registry. Once federal amendments take eﬀect, movement reporting using PIDs will become mandatory across all sectors involved in livestock handling.

The movement record function in the CLTS is now live and available for use ahead of proposed regulatory amendments. CCIA is asking clients to begin reporting livestock movements in the CLTS and to share their feedback on the tool’s usability.

“Our goal is to create a data system that supports our clients across every stage of the livestock supply chain and helps reduce the administrative burden of our clients to meet the proposed regulatory requirements when the amendments come into eﬀect,” said CCIA general manager Ashley Scott. “Starting to use the movement module now and providing feedback, strengthens traceability and ensures our clients are ready when CFIA publishes the updated regulations in Canada Gazette Part II.”

What’s new in the CLTS?

To ease the reporting burden, CCIA’s new movement record module streamlines communication between producers, transporters, and destinations.

Here’s how it works:

1. The source account/premises initiates the movement record in the CLTS.

2. An email notiﬁcation is sent to the transporter, who inputs relevant details without needing login credentials.

3. Once the animals are moved, the destination site, account/receiver, confirms receipt of the animals and updates the movement record with its PID submitting it as a Move-In event in the CLTS.

This workﬂow simpliﬁes the process, reduces paperwork, and ensures compliance with the incoming regulatory requirements. For more information on entering movement records in the CLTS, visit support.canadaid.ca

Flexible reporting options for group movements

The movement record module can also be used to report group movements without tag numbers for certain operation types, such as assembly yards or auction marts. It enables collaborative reporting between producers, transporters, and recipients. This creates a live, shared record where each party enters their portion of the movement data, supporting integrated and flexible traceability workflows.

It complements other CLTS features:

• Individual movement reporting still exists and requires tag IDs.

• Users can also report movement events through batch uploads, the CLTS MOBO mobile app, or automated web services for software-integrated systems.

Group Movement Speciﬁcation

• Auction marts and assembly yards are not required to report tag numbers but must include the total number of animals and species.

• Feedlots and other sites must report tag IDs in the Move-In event.

Working together

CCIA and national industry associations are working together to ensure industry-wide readiness. From early communication to joint system testing, the goal is to strengthen Canada’s traceability system. Producers and industry stakeholders are encouraged to update their internal systems and protocols to reﬂect proposed movement reporting responsibilities, take part in CCIA training sessions and workshops, and stay informed as the ﬁnal regulatory text is published in Canada Gazette Part II (CGII)

Using the movement record in CLTS supports compliance, which protects animal health and producers’ livelihoods. Accurate, timely reporting improves traceability, enabling a faster response to disease events and helping reduce the risk of economic loss. By keeping livestock movements properly recorded, producers can feel conﬁdent they are safeguarding their herd, their business and their family’s well-being.

Canada launches public consultations on the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement

(September 19, 2025 Global Affairs Canada News Release) The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) is a landmark agreement that facilitates free trade across North America, supporting opportunities for Canadian workers, businesses and communities.

Today, the Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade and One Canadian Economy, announced the launch of public consultations on the operation of CUSMA. This marks the Government of Canada’s second formal public consultation on the agreement, following an initial round held in 2024.

The consultations will provide Canadians with an opportunity to share their views on the agreement.

The feedback from these consultations will inform Canada’s preparations for the first joint review of the agreement.

Participants will be able to submit their comments from September 20th, 2025 until November 3rd, 2025.

Quotes

“CUSMA is a model trade agreement that helps make the North American region more competitive and prosperous. As we prepare for the joint review of CUSMA, we want to hear directly from Canadians. Their views will help us ensure that this agreement continues to reflect our national priorities, strengthen our economy, and create opportunities for businesses and workers across Canada.”

- The Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and

Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade and One Canadian Economy

Quick facts

• CUSMA entered into force on July 1, 2020.

• CUSMA comprises the world’s second free trade region, enhancing economic growth and elevating living standards across Canada, the United States and Mexico.

• Canada and the United States share the world’s most comprehensive trading relationship, reaching Can$3.6 billion worth of goods and services crossing the border each day in 2024.

• The United States ranked as the largest investor country of foreign direct investment (FDI) stock in Canada in 2024, representing 51% of FDI stock. The United States ranked as the largest recipient country of Canadian Direct Investment Abroad (CDIA) stock in 2024, receiving 52% of CDIA stock (based on Invest in Canada).

• In 2024, Canadian firms contributed US$12 billion in capital investment in the United States, further reinforcing Canada’s role as a key economic partner.

• In 2024, U.S. FDI in Canada stood at $763 billion, while Canadian foreign direct investment in the United State was $1.3 trillion. Over half of Canada’s direct investment abroad goes to the United States, supporting job creation and economic growth in communities both small and large.

Canada launches public consultations on the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement

• In 2024, Canada and Mexico engaged in nearly $56 billion in 2-way merchandise trade, with Canadian direct investment in Mexico reaching $46.4 billion, making it Canada’s ninth-largest direct investment destination.

Associated links

• Share your views: Consulting Canadians on the operation of the Canada-UnitedStates Mexico Agreement

• The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA)

• Canada-United States relations

• Canada-Mexico relations

• Doing business in North America

• Doing business in Mexico

Share your views: Consulting Canadians on the operation of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA)

This consultation will run from September 20, 2025, to November 3, 2025.

The Government of Canada is committed to strengthening and deepening relationships with its North American partners and to ensuring continued North American competitiveness and prosperity.

The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) entered into force on July 1, 2020, replacing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that had been in force since January 1, 1994. CUSMA has continued to safeguard Canada’s preferential access to the United States and Mexico and drive the integration of a North American market that represents 506 million consumers and a combined GDP of $42 trillion. In 2024, the total value of trilateral merchandise trade between Canada, the United States, and Mexico was $2.01 trillion, a 4% increase from 2023.

Trilateral free trade, under CUSMA and NAFTA before it, has provided certainty for business and investors for more than thirty years. CUSMA ensures high standards for trade in North America, which is important for Canadian businesses, workers and communities. This includes important outcomes in areas such as labour, environment, automotive trade, dispute resolution, culture, energy, and agriculture and agri-food. It also includes provisions on gender and Indigenous Peoples’ rights.

Article 34.7 affords the Parties the opportunity to assess the operation of CUSMA and ensure the Agreement remains current. The CUSMA Parties will undertake the first joint review of the Agreement in 2026, which will be an opportunity for the Parties to discuss the functioning of CUSMA, assess the progress of its

implementation, reaffirm the Agreement’s success and ensure that it remains fit for purpose in a changing global landscape.

We want to hear from you

As we approach the 2026 joint review, the Government of Canada is initiating a second phase of public consultations. To that end, the Government of Canada is seeking your views and experiences on key areas of CUSMA that are working well and on potential areas for improvement. Submissions received from these consultations will help to inform Canada’s preparations for the joint review in 2026 and other efforts to ensure the effective operation of the Agreement.

Join in: How to participate

The Government of Canada is seeking input from diverse Canadian voices. There are different ways you can participate in these consultations. You can provide a written submission in response to the Canada Gazette notice until November 3, 2025, using one of these options:

1. send your submission or any questions by email to:

CUSMA-ConsultationsACEUM@international.gc.ca

2. send your submissions or any questions by mail to:

CUSMA Consultations

Global Affairs Canada

Trade Negotiations – North America

John G. Diefenbaker Building

111 Sussex Drive

Share your views: Consulting Canadians on the operation of the Canada-United

States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA)

Ottawa, Ontario

K1N 1J1

Please read the privacy notice statement carefully prior to sending a written submission. When providing your views, we ask that you refrain from including the personal information of other individuals.

Related information

• CUSMA – Read the Agreement and related texts

• About CUSMA

• CUSMA - Summary of Outcomes

• CUSMA governance and committees

• Canada-United States relations

• Canada-Mexico relations

Consultation: Proposed changes to Chronic Wasting Disease Control Program

(September 19, 2025 Canadian Food Inspection Agency Notice) The CFIA is seeking feedback on proposed changes to its CWD Control Program which are intended to improve risk management in farmed cervids and better meet the needs of partners, industry, stakeholders and consumers.

You are encouraged to share your thoughts between September 19th and October 24th, 2025.

Agroclimate Impact Reporter (AIR) Producer Survey Now Open for Month of September

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) is collecting AIR reports or the month of September. To learn more about AIR, follow this link

To let the Science and Technology Branch of AAFC know what the conditions are like this month in your area, please respond to one of the links below:

English French

Your response will help accurately represent the impacts of weather in your region. The data collected from this survey will help inform recommendations for Livestock Tax Deferral, and the Canadian Drought Monitor

To view previous Agroclimate Impact maps, follow this link. Or see some of the other resources we produce on the AAFC Weather and Drought home page. Thank you for your participation and have a great weekend!

Government of Canada instructs Canada Post to begin transformation

(September 25, 2025 Public Services and Procurement Canada Statement) Today, the Honourable Joël Lightbound, Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement, issued the following statement:

“Canada Post is a national institution, older than our country itself, that has been serving Canadians for more than 150 years. For generations, postal workers have connected communities in every corner of the country, providing an essential lifeline to hundreds of northern, Indigenous, and rural communities. Canadians continue to rely on it today, and it remains a vital public service.

At the same time, Canada Post is now facing an existential crisis. Since 2018, the corporation has accumulated more than $5 billion in losses. In 2024 alone, it lost over $1 billion, and in 2025, it is already on track to lose close to $1.5 billion. Earlier this year, the federal government provided a $1-billion injection to keep the corporation operational. In the second quarter of 2025, Canada Post posted its worst quarterly results ever, losing $407 million. Today, the corporation is losing approximately $10 million every day.

Twenty years ago, Canada Post delivered 5.5 billion letters annually. Today, it delivers only 2 billion, even as the number of households has grown. That means fewer letters are being delivered to more addresses, while fixed costs remain high. At the same time, parcels volumes which should have been Canada Post’s growth opportunity have declined. In 2019, Canada Post delivered 62% of parcels in Canada; today, its market share has dropped below 24%, with private competitors taking the lead.

Structural challenges, combined with outdated restrictions and stalled negotiations between labour and management, have further limited the corporation’s ability to adapt.

This situation is unsustainable. Canada Post is effectively insolvent, and repeated bailouts are not a long-term solution. Transformation is required to ensure the survival of Canada Post and protect the services Canadians rely on.

In its report released on May 15, the Industrial Inquiry Commission, led by William Kaplan, identified the scale of the challenge and recommended a path forward. Building on these recommendations, I am announcing today a series of measures to stabilize the corporation’s finances and enable its modernization.

• Letter Mail Delivery Standards: Canada Post will introduce flexibilities to reflect today’s lower volumes. The average household receives just two letters per week, yet operations remain designed for far higher volumes. By adjusting standards so that non-urgent mail can move by ground instead of air, the corporation will save more than $20 million per year.

• Community Mailbox Conversions: The government is lifting the moratorium on community mailbox conversions. Currently, three-quarters of Canadians already receive mail through community, apartment, or rural mailboxes, while one-quarter still receive door-to-door delivery. Canada Post will be authorized to convert the remaining 4 million addresses to community mailboxes, generating close to $400 million in annual savings.

• Postal Network Modernization: The moratorium on rural post offices, in place since 1994, will also be lifted. The rural moratorium was imposed in 1994 and covers close to 4000 locations. It

Government of Canada instructs Canada Post to begin transformation

has not evolved in 30 years, but Canada has changed. This means that areas that used to be rural may now be suburban or even urban, but are still required to operate as rural post offices.

Canada Post must return to the government with a plan to modernize and right-size its network.

The government is also reviewing the process for increases to the stamp rate to modernize and shorten it, in line with Commissioner Kaplan’s recommendations.

The Government of Canada is removing longstanding barriers to reform, but leadership and structural change from within the corporation will be essential. Canada Post must take decisive action to deliver the services Canadians need in

a way that is financially sustainable. As our government reviews its balance sheets so we can spend less and invest more, we are asking Canada Post to do the same.

Canada Post is a vital national institution worth preserving. The measures announced today will help place the corporation on a stronger financial footing and provide the flexibility it needs to adapt to a rapidly changing environment.

Transforming an institution of this size will take time, but it is necessary to protect postal services for the future. Canadians deserve a service that is reliable, affordable, and sustainable and today’s announcement is the first step toward securing that future.”

Prime Minister Carney announces new trade agreement with Indonesia – Canada’s first-ever bilateral trade agreement with an ASEAN country

(September 24, 2025 Prime Minister’s Office News Release) The global trade landscape is rapidly changing as the United States fundamentally transforms all of its trading relationships. In this new era, our partners will no longer rely only on the strength of our values but also the value of our strength. We are building our strength at home, diversifying our partnerships abroad, and building a web of new connections to pursue our interests.

To that end, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, welcomed the President of Indonesia, Prabowo Subianto, to Ottawa today to announce the new Canada-Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA). This is Canada’s first-ever bilateral trade agreement with an ASEAN country.

This game-changing agreement will eliminate or reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers, create a more transparent and predictable environment for trade and investment, and open new opportunities for Canadian workers and industries in sectors such as clean technology, agri-food, infrastructure, critical minerals, and financial services. Once the CEPA is fully implemented, over 95% of current Canadian exports to Indonesia will have tariffs either reduced or fully eliminated, making Canadian exports – such as wheat, potash, wood, and soybeans – far more competitive in Indonesia. CEPA will come into force in 2026, giving consumers and businesses in both countries greater choices and lower costs, while empowering our Canadian workers with opportunities for high-quality careers and making our supply chains stronger and more resilient.

To further drive investment in one another’s economies, Prime Minister Carney and President Subianto welcomed a new Market Leader Partnership Agreement between Export Development Canada (EDC) and the Indonesia Investment Authority (INA). Under this partnership, EDC will make debt financing of up to $825 million available to the INA. EDC and the INA will work in collaboration to attract investment and generate new business opportunities for Canadian exporters and investors in priority sectors across Indonesia, including infrastructure, digital services, renewable energy, and advanced manufacturing.

Prime Minister Carney and President Subianto also welcomed the signing of an agreement between the Business Council of Canada and Kadin, Indonesia’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry, to strengthen trade and investment ties between Canada and Indonesia. This agreement will build a strong network of business alliances through bilateral trade missions.

With Indonesia’s market projected to become a top five global economy by 2050, these partnerships will unlock significant potential for Canadian workers, businesses, and investors.

In a more divided and dangerous world, economic growth must be bolstered by shared defence and security. To that end, Canada and Indonesia also signed a new Defence Cooperation Agreement, building on the Military Cooperation Memorandum of Understanding signed last month. Together, these arrangements will deepen collaboration on military training and education, maritime

Prime Minister Carney announces new trade agreement with Indonesia – Canada’s first-ever bilateral trade

agreement with an ASEAN country

security, cyber defence, and peacekeeping. It is a critical step in Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and a strong signal to the world that Canada and Indonesia are committed to peace and stability in the region.

Quotes

“Canada and Indonesia are unlocking major new economic opportunities together. Our new trade agreement is a game-changer for our workers and businesses, opening new markets and driving more investment between our growing economies. In the face of a shifting global landscape, Canada’s new government is diversifying and strengthening our partnerships to create greater prosperity, security, and highquality career opportunities for Canadian workers.”

The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada

“The Indo-Pacific region will play a critical role in shaping Canada’s future over the next halfcentury. Through Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, we will continue to increase our defence and security co-operation with the Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and work with our allies and partners to ensure a meaningful and reliable defence presence in the region. Strengthening our defence relationships with key partners like Indonesia demonstrates Canada is committed to supporting regional peace, security, and stability, and will be for the long-term.”

— The Hon. David J. McGuinty, Minister of National Defence

“The Canada-Indonesia CEPA is a strong step forward in Canada’s trade diversification agenda. It will open new opportunities for Canadian businesses in one of Southeast Asia’s leading economies, create good jobs for Canadians, and expand Canada’s reach in the Indo-Pacific – one of the world’s fastest-growing regions.”

The Hon. Maninder Sidhu, Minister of International Trade

Quick facts

• Indonesia is the world’s fourth most populous country, with a population of 282 million and a GDP of approximately $1.9 trillion in 2024. It is a fast-growing global market and Southeast Asia’s largest economy.

• Projected to become a top five global economy by 2050, Indonesia’s market holds significant potential for Canadian businesses, entrepreneurs, and investors.

• In 2024, Indonesia was Canada’s third-largest merchandise trading partner among Southeast Asian countries, totalling $5.6 billion. Canadian merchandise exports to Indonesia were valued at $2.3 billion, making it Canada’s largest export market in Southeast Asia and 18th largest worldwide.

A SPECIAL FACULTY SEMINAR NOVEL SOLUTIONS TO IMPROVE CATTLE PRODUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY

PRESENTED BY

DR. LELUO GUAN

PROFESSOR IN THE FACULTY OF LAND AND FOOD SYSTEMS, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2025

10:30 AM - 11:15 AM

219 Animal Science Building, 12 Dafoe Road, University of Manitoba Register for webinar: https://forms.office.com/r/khSWMY0JMp

Dr. Leluo Guan is a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair (CRC) and Professor in the Faculty of Land and Food Systems at the University of British Columbia, and a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science at the University of Alberta. Dr. Guan is one of the pioneer researchers in cattle gut microbiome and its interactions with host. Dr. Guan’s research program focuses on: 1) Interconnection of gut microbiome and cattle genome using functional genomics and advanced microbiology techniques, 2) Association of gut microbiome with feed efficiency, methane emission, meat/milk quality and safety, as well as gut development and health in beef and dairy cattle 3) Study of cattle genetic traits, including regulatory RNAs and proteins, to better understand their impact on key production and health traits. Dr. Guan is the author or co-author of 290 peer-reviewed publications and 8 book chapters with H-index of 80.0. She has secured > 65.0 M in research funding (>25.3 as PI and >40.0 M as Co-I) and has trained a total of 66 grad students and 24 postdocs.

National Centre For Livestock and the Environment is located at the UM Fort Garry campus. The Centre has been active for almost two decades and is a unique community of researchers, industry stakeholders and students that engage in multi-disciplinary, multi-agency research focused on building a more sustainable future for Canadian agriculture.

Dealing with Dry Conditions: Livestock Hay and Feed Options

Crown Lands Options to Assist with Feed Shortages

Producers facing feed shortages due to poor hay production are encouraged to explore all available options including assessing the economic viability of harvesting hay on marginal Crown land. With calf prices at record highs, optimizing feeding strategies is essential to avoid sacrificing valuable weight gain.

Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs)

 WMAs and wildlife-coded parcels are currently available for casual haying and grazing permits, based on habitat management plans. Each year, agriculture and wildlife teams work together to align these permits with ecological objectives, ensuring responsible use of the land.

 As of July 31, 2025, some WMA parcels remain available for casual permit.

 WMAs are one tool in our broader response to feed shortages. While not a complete solution, they can provide valuable support to some producers during challenging conditions.

Agricultural Crown Lands (ACL)

 Standard Agricultural Crown Land parcels are available for casual permit.

 ACL permits are managed to support agricultural use while maintaining land health and productivity. Casual use of ACL parcels is facilitated through a permit system that allows short-term access for haying and grazing, providing flexibility for producers responding to feed shortages.

Interested producers can:

1) Refer to Manitoba’s Wildlife Management Area Map to locate WMAs.

2) Contact the local Agricultural Crown Lands Farm Production Extension Specialists for available parcels.

Resources

Managing Dry Conditions and Drought information on managing crops and livestock, farm management calculators, financial assistance programs, monitoring and seasonal reports and mental health and wellness resources.

Hay Listing information on hay for sale and to list hay available for purchase

Livestock Webpage information on what’s new, resources and upcoming events.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation (MASC) information on insurance and program assistance. Contact your MB Agriculture / MASC Service Centre for program details, including recently announced support measures to aid Manitoba’s livestock producers affected by drought conditions.

Seasonal Reports seasonal updates that pertain to crop and forage production.

Weather Conditions and Reports year round data from over 100 weather stations across agro-Manitoba that monitor air temperature, relative humidity, barometric pressure, precipitation, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, soil temperature, and soil moisture.

Contact Us

For more information, contact the department: Online: www.manitoba.ca/agriculture

Email: agriculture@gov.mb.ca

Phone: 1-844-769-6224

Feed testing resources

You cannot manage what you don’t measure. Feed testing is critically important to ensure your herd’s nutritional requirements are being met to support production. Feed testing and ration balancing also helps prevent costly overfeeding. Check out this resource from the Beef Cattle Research Council:

https://www.beefresearch.ca/blog/feed-testinga-tool-for-better-returns/

When faced with reduced supplies of good quality hay due drought, many producers seek alternative feeds for their livestock. While these alternative feed sources can offer flexibility, feed testing and advice from a livestock nutritionist is recommended to ensure nutritional requirements of the type of cattle being fed are met. Check out the following resource from the Beef Cattle Research Council for considerations when using alternative feeds:

https://www.beefresearch.ca/topics/alternative -feeds/

Alternative or non-conventional feeds can be an economical means for beef cattle producers to supplement forage and grain inventories.

However, due to variability in the supply, nutrient composition and quality of these feed ingredients, there can be pitfalls if not properly managed. Have a listen to this episode of the Canadian Beef Cattle Podcast for tips on making use of different alternative feeds:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0hsfECxYMsb 0ta0JHwon67?go=1&sp_cid=a2b2ebaa1e65940f def68f683c932de9&utm_source=embed_player _p&utm_medium=desktop&nd=1&dlsi=adc2a2 537f324cf6

New to feed testing and ration balancing? Feed testing and ration balancing are good practice normally but are even more important in times of feed shortages and when making use of alternative feed sources. The following link is your one stop shop for information and instructions on feed testing including how to take and submit a sample, and how to interpret the results:

https://www.beefresearch.ca/tools/feedtesting-analysis-for-beef-cattle/

When considering salvaging crops for feed, beef producers need to consider accessibility, availability, yield, transport costs, potential antinutritional factors or other animal health impacts, and feed quality. The value of crops for livestock feeds calculator was developed to help beef producers work with their neighbors to determine a value for salvaged crops.

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?s rc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.beefresearch.ca%2Fc ontent%2Fuploads%2F2022%2F04%2FValue_of _Crop_for_Feed_locked.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWS ELINK