Critiquing Electric Vehicle Subsidies: Glorified Pseudo-Benefits

Page 1

Policy Brief

Critiquing Electric Vehicle Subsidies: Glorified Pseudo-Benefits By Malvin Heraldo Napitupulu Government of Indonesia has implemented a subsidy regulation policy for purchases of electric vehicles (EV). The subsidy is offered on every sale of electric car, hybrid car and electric motorbikes, and also cost coverage of motorbike conversion, from combustion engine to an electric one (Sulaiman, 2022). The reason behind this regulation is to accelerate the development of EVs ecosystem and to create a cleaner Indonesia. The government considers this the right way to reduce fuel reliance and achieve a net zero emission target (Sulaiman, 2023). As a target, Indonesia is moving forward to reach 1.2 million electric bikes and 35,000 electric cars use by 2024. It is understandable that EV industry must be developed in Indonesia, but subsidy is not the right answer for enliven the businesses. Subsidy tends to cause misalignment between price and production costs (Heuvelen, 2023). It also can create market distortion by artificial surge in demand. Subsidies can inflate demand for EVs because consumers receive significant incentives, creating a bubble that could burst when subsidies are eliminated. Subsidies also have limitation because there will be a time that government stop the subsidy. So, the encouragement to buy EVs is only in short term, leading to spikes in sales, and end up with declines after the subsidy stops. As a result, the EV market wouldn’t be stable and grow that large to substitute the old combustion-engine vehicle industry. Furthermore, the subsidy scheme would affect to market dependence. After the subsidy is eliminated, it may struggle to sustain and make the EV industry vulnerable to change due to economic and political situation. On the other side, this subsidy scheme doesn’t address the need to build a large industry that requires involvement of all levels of society from high to low income. The government sets an amount of subsidy that is USD 5,150 for new purchase of battery-electric car a half amount for purchasing a conventional hybrid. Then, for electric motorbikes, government subsidizes USD 520 for new purchase and USD 320 for converting and combustion engine two-wheeler to an electric one (Mahalana & Posada, 2023). The income disparity causes each potential buyer would face an ‘annual benefits’ after purchase the EV. With this fixed subsidy amount, people who would adopt it are they who can afford the price or simply if their annual net benefits are positive. What worse, rich people will get benefit they don’t need. At the end, EVs are sold at high price making it exclusive to people with higher income only since the price is still too high for some middle-income society. So, the subsidy for EVs will not result on businesses growth since it is not affordable to low- and middle-income people. For this case, the government should at least make an adjustment to people’s income or wealth. So, low-income or

Malvin Heraldo Napitupulu | 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.