Virginia Turfgrass Journal - July / August 2012

Page 18

Feature Story

Biosolids for Cool-Season

Sod Production By Derik Cataldi, Erik Ervin, Ph.D., and Greg Evanylo, Virginia Tech

A

pplying municipal biosolids to sod-production fields may benefit sod growers and taxpayers, who must otherwise bear the cost of wastewater sewage-sludge disposal. As urban areas expand, sod growers must produce and distribute sod for new homes, apartments and parks. Wastewater treatment facilities, meanwhile, must treat and dispose of more sewage. Linking sod production and waste management may produce

a cost-competitive product, while providing a beneficial reuse pathway for biosolids. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of biosolids treatments to synthetic fertilizer for sod production.

Materials and methods

At Woodward Turf Farms (in Remington, VA), an anaerobically digested class-A dewatered biosolids cake from the Alexandria Sanitation Authority

Figure 1. 2010 Turfgrass Quality, using a 1–9 scale (with 9 being excellent and 6 being acceptable).

and a blended biosolids dewatered cake (with woody fines) were applied and incorporated to supply three estimated nitrogen-availability rates (87, 174 and 261 lbs. N/acre). These rates respectively are 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 times the agronomic N rate estimated to be required to produce tall fescue sod. All treatments were compared to a 174 lbs. N/A (the recommended agronomic N rate) synthetic fertilizer

Figure 2. 2011 Turfgrass Quality, using a 1–9 scale (with 9 being excellent and 6 being acceptable).

18 | Virginia Turfgrass Journal July/August 2012 www.vaturf.org


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.