More Rival Staffers Join Ron Paul Campaign

More Rival Staffers Join Ron Paul Campaign Steve Watson Infowars.com December 30, 2011 Bachmann maintains Paul bribed former campaign chairman Yet more staffers formerly working for a GOP rival of Ron Paul have endorsed the Texas Congressman’s campaign this week.

Concord Patch reports that five former New Hampshire staffers of former Governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson announced Friday that they are now endorsing Ron Paul for president.

“Like many political observers, we see clear and compelling differences between Congressman Ron Paul and the other candidates who will garner significant support in New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary,” the five former staffers said in a statement.

The five, including Johnson’s former state coordinator and former communications director, left in October citing “frustration with the national campaign.”

Johnson announced earlier this week that he was quitting the Republican race and would be running as a Libertarian.

Noting that Paul and Johnson share some “very similar ideas”, Johnson’s former communications director Matt Simon said “It’s something we’d talked about, and we discussed the timing, and certainly his announcement Wednesday made it easier to go ahead with this,” “There are two like-minded candidates in this race,” Simon said. “At this point it comes down to ideas, and the vast differences between Ron Paul and the other candidates we’ve seen play out in the last couple weeks.”

The announcement comes on the back of that of former Michelle Bachmann campaign chairman in Iowa, Kent Sorenson, who “defected” To the Paul campaign

on live TV yesterday.

Bachmann is charging that the Paul campaign bribed Sorenson, a claim that both Sorenson and the Paul campaign have strenuously denied.

“I was never offered money from the Ron Paul campaign or anyone associated with them and certainly would never accept any,” Sorenson said in a statement via the Paul campaign.

Calling the allegation “ridiculous”, the Paul campaign also cited a statement by Wes Enos, Bachmann’s Iowa political director, also denying the bribery charge.

“I can say unequivocally that Kent Sorenson’s decision was, in no way financially motivated,” Enos said in his statement. “While I personally disagree with Kent’s decision, and plan to stay with Michele Bachmann because I truly believe in her, I cannot, in good conscience watch a good man like Kent Sorenson be attacked as a ‘sell-out.’”

Enos has now “quit” the campaign, Bachmann herself revealed in an interview with CNN today.

It remains to be seen whether he too will join the Ron Paul campaign.

Dangerous Warmongering Rhetoric: Michele Bachmann lists Russia and China as “Axis of Evil” Andrew Steele 1. America 20xy December 30, 2011 During an interview on the “Mickelson in the Morning,” show on Iowa’s WHO-AM Radio Thursday (watch it HERE via C-SPAN) struggling GOP candidate Michele Bachmann, when asked by a caller (at 44:50 in the video) to reconcile the United States’ hypocritically different positions towards Iran and the historically more hostile North

Korea, listed a number of countries in an “Axis of Evil” just as George W. Bush did years ago before invading the first country on his list– Iraq– and embroiling America in a long costly war that killed and maimed thousands of American soldiers, wiped out the lives of 1 million Iraqis, and eroded Americans’ last bit of trust in their government.

“There is a New Axis of Evil that has emerged with North Korea, between Pakistan, between China, and between Iran…and with Russia,” Bachmann said. “Russia supplied the nuclear scientists to help Iran gain that nuclear weapon.”

“That was… a pretty sweeping statement you just made,” said the host. “To declare all those countries as now the new Axis of Evil is…Ronald Regan said that about the Cold War communist states. Would that be reflective of a Michele Bachmann foreign policy? The New Axis of Evil is all those countries, including Russia?”

Bachmann answered by claiming that she’s not rooting for war and stating that she was against President Obama’s war in Libya, but didn’t retract her statement about Russia and China. Her disturbing inclusion of the two nations in her own “Axis of Evil” is a serious and dangerous escalation of rhetoric by someone running for the presidency of the United States.

The United States’ continuing reach for oversees empire has now begun to stir serious tension with the two powers.

For instance, former Russian President (and current candidate for President of Russia) Vladmir Putin has accused the United States of meddling in Russia’s election, the protests from which the American media attempted to portray as a Russian ‘Arab Spring’, (like the riots that assisted the West in toppling Middle Eastern leaders in 2o11). As well, Putin has accused the West of being complicit in the execution of Muammar al-Gaddafi.

Russia has also come to Syria’s aid in the face of the United States’ drumbeat to overthrow its government, supplying it with cruise missiles.

The United States has come dangerously closer to conflict with China over the issue of the South China Sea, and over the United States’ increased menacing of Pakistan, which 1. prompted China to declare last May that an attack on Pakistan would be considered an attack on China itself. China has also accused the West of trying to meddle in Russia’s election.

Earlier this month a military General from the Chinese National Defense University called for China to protect Iran– the nation that Bachmann has loudly railed against during her campaign– even if it means launching World War Three.

Bachmann seeks to continue a policy of increased aggression against Iran that started under George W. Bush and continues under Barack Obama. Those who support this policy selectively highlight Iran’s reaction to years of Western hostility against it, and refuse to acknowledge that Iran’s push back and potential drive for nuclear weapons is a result of the U.S. encircling it in Iraq and Afghanistan while ratcheting up the war rhetoric against it, and the fact that Israel menaces it with reportedly over a hundred of its own nuclear weapons, (though it hasn’t officially declared them).

To say that a Bachmann presidency, or the presidency any of the other GOP candidates (other than Ron Paul, who stands for a strong defense but is staunchly against needlessly stirring up tensions with other countries) would be a repeat of the Bush and Obama presidencies is accurate in the sense that it would be a continuation of the same destructive foreign policy that has plagued America and the world for years, yet it would be even worse because at this stage of the neocons’ game, the consequences of coming to blows with Russia and China would be larger and even more tragic than any of the wars before it.

The Number One Catastrophic Event That Americans Worry About: Economic Collapse 1. The Economic Collapse December 30, 2011 Can you guess what the number one catastrophic event that Americans worry about is? There are certainly many to choose from. Many Americans are deathly afraid of a major terrorist attack.

Others live in constant fear of natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanoes and hurricanes.

Still others are incredibly concerned that a massive pandemic will break out at any time or that World War III will erupt in the Middle East.

Yes, there are certainly a lot of potential catastrophic events that one can worry about in the times in which we live, but the number one catastrophic event that Americans worry about is actually “economic collapse”. At least that is what a 1. recent survey conducted by Leiflin Inc. for the EcoHealth Alliance found. But this goes along with what so many other polls have found over the past few years. Over and over again, opinion polls have found that the number one issue that American voters are concerned about is the economy. The truth is that average Americans are deeply, deeply concerned about unemployment, debt, the housing crash and the steady decline in the standard of living. It has been years since the U.S. economy has operated at a “normal” level, and many Americans are afraid that things could soon get a whole lot worse.

In the new survey mentioned above, those contacted were asked to select the top three potential catastrophes that worry them the most.

The following results come directly from the survey….

Economic Collapse: 63% Natural Disaster: 46% Terrorist Attack: 44% Global Disease Outbreak: 33% Global War: 27% Nuclear Accident: 25% Global Warming: 22% Fuel Shortage: 15% Cyber War: 8% Famine: 8% Oil Spill: 6% Industrial Accident: 5% As you can see, “economic collapse” was the winner by a wide margin.

So are there good reasons for the American people to be concerned about an economic collapse?

Of course there are.

Back in 2008, a financial crisis that began on Wall Street was felt in the farthest corners of the globe.

This time, ground zero for the financial crisis is going to be in Europe. As I have written about previously, the European financial system is rapidly coming apart at the seams. The euro continues to drop like a rock, and banking stocks continue their long-term decline.

Many people expect a “financial collapse” to happen on a particular day. But that is not how it happens usually. Instead, it is often like a snowball that starts rolling downhill very slowly at first but that eventually become a huge avalanche.

Right now, we are seeing the financial world come apart in slow motion. A recent article posted on Automatic Earth included a list of the year-to-date performance of some of the most prominent global banking stocks. These numbers are absolutely staggering….

BofA: -60.38% Citi: -44.76% Goldman Sachs: -46.41% JPMorgan: -23.03% Morgan Stanley: -45.24% RBS: -50% Barclays: -34.32% Lloyds: -63.02%

UBS: -29.33% Deutsche Bank: -28,55% Crédit Agricole: -56.04% BNP Paribas: -37.67% Société Générale: -59.57% But because these numbers happened over the course of a year and not on a single day it doesn’t feel quite as much like a “collapse”.

Unfortunately, things are about to get a whole lot worse. Global credit markets are really freezing up – especially in Europe.

Considering the fact that the entire global financial system is based on credit and debt, that is a very bad thing.

Our system simply does not work when banks do not want to lend money to each other or to businesses.

Just yesterday there was an article in the Guardian that talked about how it looks like the credit crunch may be getting even worse….

“If European banks are still this concerned, it’s not a good sign,” said Karl Schamotta, senior markets strategist with Western Union Business Solutions. “That underlines the possibility that this liquidity crunch is getting worse and will continue into the new year.”

When banks cut back on lending, that causes the money supply to shrink. When the money supply shrinks substantially, it is almost impossible to avoid a recession. A recent article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard detailed how the money supply in many eurozone nations is shrinking at a very rapid pace right now….

Simon Ward from Henderson Global Investors said “narrow” M1 money – which includes cash and overnight deposits, and signals short-term spending plans – shows an alarming split between North and South.

While real M1 deposits are still holding up in the German bloc, the rate of fall over the last six months (annualised) has been 20.7pc in Greece, 16.3pc in Portugal, 11.8pc in Ireland, and 8.1pc in Spain, and 6.7pc in Italy. The pace of decline in Italy has been accelerating, partly due to capital flight. “This rate of contraction is greater than in early 2008 and implies an even deeper recession, both for Italy and the whole periphery,” said Mr Ward.

Those are very, very frightening numbers.

About the only thing propping up European banks right now is the fact that the European Central Bank is loaning them gigantic piles of cheap money.

But there is a big problem.

European banks are running out of collateral for those loans as an article in the Wall Street Journal recently noted….

Even after the European Central Bank doled out nearly half a trillion euros of loans to cash-strapped banks last week, fears about potential financial problems are still stalking the sector. One big reason: concerns about collateral.

The only way European banks can now convince anyone—institutional investors, fellow banks or the ECB—to lend them money is if they pledge high-quality assets as collateral.

Now some regulators and bankers are becoming nervous that some lenders’ supplies of such assets, which include European government bonds and investment-grade nongovernment debt, are running low.

So what happens when banks all over Europe start running out of collateral and can’t get any more loans?

The answer should be obvious.

As I detailed a few days ago, many prominent voices in the financial world now believe that we could be looking at a financial crisis that will be even worse than 2008.

If you want to see what happens when a collapse happens and a depression begins, just look at what is happening in Greece…. *100,000 businesses have been closed since the beginning of the crisis. *About a third of the nation is now living in poverty. *The unemployment rate for those under the age of 24 is 39 percent. *The number of suicides has increased by 40 percent in the past year. *Thefts and burglaries nearly doubled between 2007 and 2009.

Things have gotten so bad that hundreds of families in Greece are abandoning their children.

Some are taking their children to charitable institutions and others are handing them directly over to the government.

The following sad story of one Greek family comes from an article in the Guardian….

“Psychologically we were all in a bit of a mess,” said Gasparinatos. “We were sleeping on mattresses on the floor, the rent hadn’t been paid for months, something had to be done.”

And so, with Christmas approaching, the 42-year-old took the decision to put in an official request for three of his boys and one daughter to be taken into care.

“The crisis had killed us. I am ashamed to say but it had got to the point where I couldn’t even afford the €2 needed to buy bread,” he told the Guardian. “We didn’t want to break up the family but we did think it would be easier for them if four of my children were sent to an institution for maybe two or three years.”

Does that seem shocking to you?

Well, all of this is coming to America eventually.

Someday we will see American parents abandoning their children because they cannot take care of them anymore.

Someday we will see suicides absolutely skyrocket in America because people have lost all hope.

Someday we will see thefts and burglaries soar to unprecedented heights as millions of desperate people attempt to try to find some way to survive.

It is all coming.

The federal government cannot pile up a trillion dollars of additional debtevery year indefinitely.

We cannot afford to see an average of 23 manufacturing facilities a day in the United States shut down. Eventually there won’t be anymore factories to shut down.

We cannot afford to keep putting millions more Americans on welfare. At this point the government is feeding 46 million Americans a month. Will the government eventually be feeding most of us?

The U.S. economy is getting weaker and weaker and weaker. All of the long-term trends are absolutely nightmarish. We are accumulating debt faster than ever, and our ability to produce wealth is diminishing faster than ever.

There is no way that things are going to be okay if we stay on the path that we are currently on.

So the truth is that Americans should be very concerned about an economic collapse.

It is coming and it is going to be very painful.