1 minute read

Process

Next Article
CubeIterations

CubeIterations

When creating the molds for the pouring models, I wanted to experiment with which method and materials would be the most effective. I found that the final product was dramatically different depending on the material used to create the mold and fill it. I worked with plaster and rockite in order to determine which one would work best for my design.

For the first model, I used the folding method with foam core to construct the mold. I used hot glue on the sides but primarily sealed it all together with clear packing tape. This was the most efficient method and kept to mold together. I also used plaster which worked well with the foam core to create a clean finished product.

Advertisement

For the second mold, I used chipboard and hot glue to create the positive part of my design. When constructing the mold, I kept in mind what side I would build first to allow the mixture to pour properly. I used a combination of rockite and plaster however, the mold was not as optimal. When letting the mixture harden, the moisture caused the walls to weaken.

FinalSite

For the final site model, we were challenge to choose one of our cubes to alter and incorporate into a site that is occupiable. Using my 2nd cube, I decided to stretch out my original design and play with the idea of different forms. By extruding the interior portion, I was able to create a second form that was separate from my original cube. I wanted to emphasis the idea of circulation and create an interior that was free flowing yet still encompassed a well designed directional plan. The different entrances create a pavilion that has contrasting viewpoints. Each area within my sight allows for different social engagement.

This article is from: