Source: Email
A DIALOGUE WITH AN ACADEMIC (MD)
IPCC - BELIEVER
Erik Bye
July 28, 2025
Introduction
It is a challenge to discuss Climate Change and global warming with a person who is a strict believer of the IPCC. Usually, these people have no basic knowledge of physics; they may have an academic background, but this is normally not in Science. Typical backgrounds might be literature, arts, law, philosophy, or medicine.
I have a good friend with a medical education, an MD. From time to time, we have the opportunity to discuss this topic on Facebook.
Academics without knowledge of the climate
The last time I was confronted with this opportunity, it started with a general concern due to the fact that the climate issue is losing attention in the public.
From my friend:
«This is the opposite of what is necessary now. All messages from the IPCC, the climate scientists, and the meteorological stations point to an increased global warming.»
EB: I felt for a balance in the standing, and argued that more and more scientific literature indicates exactly the opposite, the failure of IPCC.
Academics without an understanding of science
«I am not there, my MD-friend answered.
I am afraid of the CO2 level and believe we have to follow the message from IPCC.»
EB: What scientific documentation do you have for your viewpoint? was my first wondering.
He answered:
«I don't understand climate science, I just support IPCC and the thousands of scientists that agree upon this.»
EB: If I tell you that three Norwegian scientists have shown that the temperature changes before the CO2 level. Then the CO2 can not be the cause of the temperature change. What do you consider then?
«One single article does not change anything. I am not able to read scientific articles; I just support the messages from the IPCC.»
EB: Does that mean that you just follow IPCC, without considering any critical questions?
«I do not know how to come up with any questions. The message from IPCC and thousands of scientists is so overwhelming that no criticism is necessary or rational.
I know that you are sceptical of IPCC. But here you are in the wrong arena. Why not listen to more important scientists?»
Decisions without knowledge
EB: I have never understood how it is possible to have manifested opinions without any knowledge about the topic.
I have tried to discuss this with at least five Norwegian scientists. They all stop the discussion when I am referring to all the relevant scientific facts that are against global warming, due to human-caused CO2 in the atmosphere.
I have cooperated with the scientist who reported the Nobel scandal in physics in 2021, The Nobel Fraud. There are 2000 academics who have signed the CLINTEL proclamation: There is no Climate Crisis.
There are several Nobel Prize laureates in physics who deny the message of the IPCC. 44 international top climate experts have stopped cooperating with the IPCC. The Climate models of IPCC have been shown to put too much weight on the input data in the models. This error has been documented in all the ARs from IPCC, from AR1 to AR6. And nobody within the IPCC does react to this at all.
It is obvious that you are not properly informed about what is happening in the scientific community.
The most serious problem in the climate question is that it is international organisations, far above the scientists, who are controlling the whole climate case. They work for a new world order and a new world economy. The oil and the CO2 is just the most convenient vapon to defend the international system.
There are thousands of scientists who protest against this international attack and reorganisation.
Those who accept this Fraud, without searching for real knowledge, do have a responsibility in the way the Green Deal will destroy the economic system of the whole world.
This is dramatic, and even academics like you are watching, without any reactions:
There were no comments from my friend upon these comments.
However, an unknown person wanted to contribute.
Harassment
«I think that the Science on this question lies far beyond my and your understanding. So continue with links, if that calms you down.»
EB: Amazingly, how much you know about me. Tell me more.
The mix of environment and climate
«I am leaving for a trip into Nature. I have been close to Nature during 82 years of living. I just visited this discussion to look at the questions those in the sofa are struggling with. »
EB: I can wait.
After 40 years of experience as a researcher in Science, 40 scientific papers, Dr. Philos in physical chemistry, 15 years of work in the climate topic, including a considerable reading of scientific literature, I look forward to listening to your knowledge of me.
Nature is important to take care of, considering all the environmental questions. Here, the climate activists have gone into «The Deadline End», by mixing Climate and the environment. Let me hear from you
To my MD-friend:
EB: Do you at all follow up on the development of the climate questions? What about The Nobel Fraud? Academics all over the world should be really concerned about this.
My concluding remarks
How is it at all possible to have an academic education and an academic responsible job, and lose the ability to think critically? And even lose the ability to see the requirements for critical thinking about society's questions? The Green Deal will destroy the world economy.
Next time the following questions might be expressed:
What kind of information is necessary for you to change opinion about global warming?
Who should present this information?