Climate questions never asked - Science
Erik Bye
July 1, 2025
Scientific considerations around: Mechanism, Methods, Models, Documentation
1. Why are no alarmists talking about the missing scientific documentation of the CO2-hypothesis?
2. Why are no alarmists talking about the 1.5 degrees measures as a political issue, with no scientific documentation?
3. Why are no alarmists talking about the fact that the climate can not be modelled?
4. Why are no alarmists talking about the fact that Science is never settled
5. Why are no alarmists talking about the 1.5˚C measure instead of reducing the CO2 emissions?
6. Why are no alarmists talking about the difference between the observed and calculated temperatures?
7. Why are no alarmists talking about the harmonization of temperature data?
8. Why are no alarmists talking about dietary advice, the climate, and a sustainable system?
9. Why are no alarmists talking about the photosynthesis in the ocean?
10. Why are no alarmists talking about that the IPCC excludes natural
forcing from their climate models?
11. Why are no alarmists talking about the ocean not being more acidic?
12. Why are no alarmists talking about the high level of CO2 in the greenhouse?
13. Why are no alarmists talking about whether the temperature is observed or modelled?
14. Why are no alarmists talking about consensus as not scientific?
15. Why are no alarmists talking about the bacteria synthesis with CH4?
16. Why are no alarmists talking about the biological function of CH4?
17. Why are no alarmists talking about the 40% reduced global warming due to the reduced level of aerosols in the atmosphere?
V, Theory, Observations
18. Why are no alarmists talking about the Nobel scandal?
V, Theory, Modelling
19. Why are no alarmists talking about the quality and the positions of the weather stations?
V, Observations, quality assurance
20. Why are no alarmists talking about the undersea volcanoes and warm sources?
21. Why are no alarmists talking about the 40% reduced global warming due to the reduced level of aerosols in the atmosphere?
22. Why are no alarmists talking about the Nobel scandal?
23. Why are no alarmists talking about the quality and the positions of the weather stations?
24. Why are no alarmists talking about the undersea volcanoes and warm sources?
25. Why are no alarmists talking about the theory of Svante Arrheniusis being falsified?
26. Why are no alarmists talking about the negative consequences of geoengineering?
27. Why are no alarmists talking about the production of oxygen by photosynthesis?
28. Why are no alarmists talking about the natural existence of Chemtrails?
29. Why are no alarmists talking about photosynthesis in the ocean?
30. Why are no alarmists talking about the change from El Niño to La Niña, considering the reduced global temperature?
31. Why are no alarmists talking about the extremely expensive production of green (with CCS) and blue (with electrolysis) hydrogen?
32. Why are no alarmists talking about all the IPCC scandals, i.e., the failure of the CO2-hypothesis, the climate modelling errors, and the failure of the climate goals?