Earth's Hidden CO2 Uncertainties - TC

Page 1


Earth's Hidden CO2: Uncertainties and the Climate Debate.

Introduction.

This is a companion article to a previously published paper, titled "Comparison of CO2 Sources and Sinks using IPCC data. More questions than answers linger". By Terigi Ciccone and Gerald Ratzer, Revised 30 June 2025, see: https://www.allaboutenergy.net/?view=article&id=4382:comparison-of-co2sources-and-sinks-using-ipcc-data&catid=212&highlight=WyJjaWNjb25lIl0=.

The purpose of this study is to challenge two cornerstone assumptions used by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) in formulating its Global CO2 Annual Budgets, as exemplified by Figure 7.3 in the AR4 (Fourth Assessment Report).

• First, reasonably accurate estimates can be made on human-made CO2 levels; However, the IPCC estimate of geologic/volcanic made CO2 amounts appears to have confidence levels varying from very low to medium at best.

• Second, the IPCC assumes that, before the onset of the Industrial Revolution, a natural equilibrium existed between CO2 sources and sinks that prevented CO2 from accumulating in the atmosphere. Therefore, the IPCC claims that all the increased atmospheric CO2 above the Preindustrial level of 280 ppm must be attributed to human-made CO2 emissions.

Abstract.

Imagine trying to solve a puzzle when most of the pieces are lost at sea. That's the challenge scientists face when determining how much CO2 originates from Earth's geological processes, such as volcanoes and tectonic plate movements, and how it may contribute to climate change. CO2 is a gas often linked to global warming, but opinions differ sharply. Some, such as the IPCC, argue that CO2 and the greenhouse effect are the primary drivers of global warming. Others, including many reputable skeptics, believe that CO2 plays a minor role, with natural forces such as gravitational auto-compression or periodic volcanic and El Nino cycles taking the lead. This article examines what we know, what we don't know, and

what we think we know about the geological sources and sinks of CO2 on Earth. We focus on CO2 production deep within the planet and on the ocean floors The challenges in reliably measuring and estimating them only fuel the ongoing global climate debate.

PART 1. The Unknown Depths of Earth's CO2

When people think of CO2, they often picture truck exhaust or a smokestack from a factory. However, as demonstrated by IPCC measurements and estimates, the Earth itself produced and released about 95% of all atmospheric CO2 in 2005, 2023, and 2024, [i]. Natural sources include ocean releases, plants, animals, phytoplankton, and wildfires, among others. Geological sources of heat and CO2 include volcanoes, hot vents, and tectonic zones; yet, the IPCC has little reliable data on the amounts. The oceans, covering over 70% of the planet, are a vast mystery, with their floors less explored than the surface of Mars.

Take submarine volcanoes, like Axial Seamount off Oregon. It's one of the bestmonitored underwater volcanoes, with eruptions in 1998, 2011, and 2015, which have been tracked by underwater cables for earthquakes and heat. Still, we don't know how much CO2 it releases. The deep ocean is dark, under intense pressure, and challenging to study, making measurements rare and subject to significant uncertainties. Scale that up to the gigantic Mid-Atlantic Ridge, a 10,000-mile-long underwater mountain range where tectonic plates pull apart, widening the Atlantic Ocean floor [ii]. This vast, unexplored region releases unknown quantities of CO2 through lava and vents. The IPCC uses estimates of approximately 0.07–0.15 billion tons of CO2 per year for all underwater ridges worldwide, which are based on a limited number of sites and are therefore estimates or guesses at best. Most of this vast MAR and possibly dozens of other floor ridges remain unexplored and unmeasured.

Then there are subduction zones, such as those in the Pacific's "Ring of Fire," which stretches 25,000 miles around Japan, Chile, and Indonesia. The area of this behemoth is two to three times larger than the Mid-Atlantic Region. Here, one plate slides under another, pulling at times carbon-rich rocks, mountains, and mountain chains deep beneath the surface and into its fiery furnace. These materials will release vast quantities of CO2 when heated, potentially millions or billions of tons during a single event. Yet, the IPCC lacks direct data, especially from the deeper underwater zones, and uses total global estimates of 0.1–0.2 billion tons of CO2 per year, which are rough approximations guesses. This

minimal knowledge leaves big questions about Earth's geological CO2 contribution.

East Antarctica, along with its surrounding oceans, is home to one of the largest and most active volcanic regions on Earth. Over the past decade, scientists have discovered approximately 140 volcanoes hidden beneath glaciers and ice sheets, which were previously unnoticed. Additionally, the eastern part of Antarctica is being slowly torn apart from the central continent. This activity is causing significant melting at the base of the ice, creating vast subglacial rivers and freshwater lakes that drain and warm the surrounding Antarctic oceans. The melting isn't driven by sunlight or changes in CO2 levels. Air temperatures in Antarctica rarely rise above freezing, and when they do, it's only briefly along the eastern coast lasting at most a few hours a year. Similarly, Greenland's central ice sheet lies over a massive volcanic vent, with most melting occurring beneath the ice.

Volcanoes and Rising CO2: A Natural Link?

Some researchers, such as geophysicist Peter Ward, suggest that volcanic activity over centuries may release significant amounts of CO2 into the oceans and atmosphere. His chart (described below) links eruptions to temperature and CO2 changes. Others propose that increased volcanic activity, including underwater eruptions, could explain a significant portion of the rise in atmospheric CO2 (from 280 to 420 parts per million since 1800). The chart we created earlier compares this idea. This chart compares estimated volcanic CO2 emissions (spikes at Laki 1783 and Tambora 1815) to atmospheric CO2 levels (280–420 ppm) from 1700 to 2025. The IPCC currently uses background CO2 emissions of ~0.3 billion tons per year; however, submarine data are sparse, leaving considerable uncertainty about the actual impacts of volcanoes.

Ward's chart below adds yet another layer of complexity. It suggests that ocean bottom basaltic effusive eruptions, with their 2,000-2,300 °C lava, rapidly warmed the ocean waters for approximately 15,000 years, thereby releasing vast amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere in accordance with Henry's Law. This chart plots δ¹⁸O (a temperature proxy) and volcanic sulfate (a proxy for measuring volcanic eruptions) from Greenland ice cores. We observe that over the last 25,000 years, temperature spikes, such as A-D, terminated the previous ice age approximately 9,000 years ago Note also that the sulfate spike at the far right reappeared 300-400 years ago and terminated the Little Ice Age approximately 200 years ago. The chart then shows that this increased volcanism persists, indicating that the warming and CO2 releases continue to this day.

PART 2 Earth's CO2 Factory: Recycling and Creating New CO2.

The following discussions further highlight data gaps, fueling debate about the sources of CO2. Earth isn't just a passive stage for CO2; instead, it's an active factory, recycling old, naturally sequestered CO2 into fresh CO2. The Earth also produces new virgin abiogenic CO2 deep within its fiery mantle. Let's see how this works.

Recycling Through Geology

Subduction zones, such as those in the Pacific's Ring of Fire, are key hubs for Earth's carbon recycling as seen in the image below. Imagine a conveyor belt pulling slabs of ocean floor, crust, and sediments rich in carbon from ancient rocks and sea life deep underground. These sediments, often limestone, heat up to 300–700°C under pressure, releasing carbon dioxide (CO2) into the ocean depths. A significant event, such as the subduction of a limestone mountain or mountain range, could release unknown millions or billions of tons of CO2, far outpacing the steady output of spreading zones like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The yellow arrow in the image below indicates that the plate on the left side of the ocean trench is being subducted, sucked under the plate on the right side. Note, in particular, the resulting rising diapirs from the asthenosphere, the formation of magma chambers, and the lava that pours out during volcanic eruptions. These eruptions build volcanic mountains and mountain ranges, as well as island chains. Note also how the entire right plate moves from right to left. This is the process by which the Cascade Mountain Range was formed near the central US and then, over millions of years, migrated to the Pacific Northwest. It is also the same process that built the Hawaiian island chain, which continues to this day.

The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is an example of where tectonic and continental plates are pulled apart, and it also plays a significant role in recycling ancient carbonaceous rocks into newly remanufactured CO2. Note that the magma rises upward through

cracks, fissures, and eruptions, carrying the freshly recycled CO2 into the oceans and eventually the atmosphere Here, we observe how the plates are being pushed apart and how the ocean floor is spreading out as CO2 is released into the oceans. This CO2 may take decades, even centuries, to migrate from the ocean depths and enter the atmosphere. It's a slow process, like a drip, but its 10,000-mile length adds up to its eventual atmospheric level.

Look at the combined effects of the spreading ocean floor of the Atlantic and how it's pushing the North American Continent westward. At the same time, the subducting Pacific Ocean is sucking/pulling the North American Continent westward. These combined forces are moving the entire continent westward by one-half to three-quarters of an inch per year, and rotating it in a clockwise direction by about the same amounts and rate. Over the next several million years, the Pacific Ocean is expected to shrink notably, while the Atlantic Ocean is projected to expand slowly. Other diverging zones are happening in northwestern Africa and Antarctica.

Antarctica: Fire below and Ice above. What other notable CO2 geologic events are occurring worldwide? In the image below, we focus on West Antarctica, along with its surrounding oceans, which is home to one of the largest and most active volcanic regions on Earth. Over the past decade, scientists have discovered, thus far, approximately 140 volcanoes hidden beneath the icy oceans, coastal glaciers,

and inland ice sheets, which were previously unnoticed. Additionally, the western part of Antarctica is being slowly pulled apart and broken from the central continent. The geological forces and activity are comparable to those described above for the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. And, like the MAR, it is recycling and possibly manufacturing newly minted CO2, as discussed below.

This expansive volcanic activity is causing significant melting of the ice, creating vast subglacial rivers, freshwater lakes, and warming the surrounding Antarctic ocean. This is the location where tourists go to witness and record the dramatic videos of ice cliffs breaking off and crashing into the sea. This is also the home of the "melting" Thwaites Glacier, also known as the Doomsday Glacier. This is where air and water temperatures aren't driven by sunlight, changes in atmospheric CO2 levels, or solar and albedo activities. The Air temperatures in Antarctica rarely rise above freezing, and when they do, it's only briefly and only along the coastal coast lasting at most several hours per year.

Similarly, Greenland's ice sheet rests over a massive geologically powered gas vent as seen in the image below. The central two branches stretch from eastern Greenland to Iceland, melting Greenland glaciers from below the ice and warming

the adjacent seas. The other two stretch from near coastal Canada to northwestern Europe, similarly, warming the oceans from the Canadian North Atlantic to the Nordic seas. We may never know how much CO2 this gigantic gas plume releases into the oceans and atmosphere. If we know less about the ocean bottom CO2 than we know about the surface of Mars, we can say that here we probably know more about Pluto than we do about these alien Antarctic and Greenland subglacial regions.

Creating New CO2

Here's the exciting part: Earth can also make new CO2 in its mantle, the hot layer beneath the crust. The mantle contains carbon and oxygen in minerals, and under high temperatures (1,000–2,000°C) and pressures, these elements react to form carbon dioxide (CO2) This "abiogenic" CO2 unrelated to life escapes through volcanoes or cracks. In subduction zones, the melting of rocks enhances this process. We don't know the exact amounts, but the data shows that Earth actively produces CO2, not just recycles it. This abiogenic CO2 may also be a possible explanation for the extremely high CO2 atmospheric levels in its ancient past, which was also characterized by extremely high volcanic activity.

The Climate Debate: CO2's Role in Question

The role of CO2 in climate change sparks fierce debates. The IPCC, based on models, states that CO2 traps heat through the greenhouse effect, resulting in a 1.1°C temperature rise since pre-industrial times and predicting 2–4.5°C more by 2100 if emissions continue to grow. They link rising CO2 levels (from 280 to 420 ppm) to human activities, such as burning fossil fuels. Skeptics, including some scientists and Nobel Laureates, disagree. They argue CO2, at just 0.042% of the atmosphere, has a minuscule warming effect. Its effect is overshadowed by water vapor and natural forces and cycles. Some, like the article's author, suggest that gravitational auto-compression, the Earth's internal gravitational forces compress materials to release CO2, and/or volcanic cycles, might dominate climate change. Historical CO2 rises (e.g., 180 to 280 ppm over millennia) occurred naturally, and unmeasured geological CO2 could play a bigger role than thought. Both sides agree on basic physics (e.g., CO2 absorbs infrared), but differ on its impact, with data gaps fueling the divide.

Measuring Earth's CO2: Shaky Estimates

The IPCC estimates that 330–340 billion tons of CO2 are exchanged between the oceans and the air yearly, with a net sink of 2.5–3 billion tons. The chart below illustrates the increasing outgassing of CO2 over the past five decades, which is consistent with the rise in atmospheric and ocean temperatures. This chart, however, only shows surface waters and is not representative of what's happening in the deep oceans or the geological sources we've discussed.

How does the IPCC do its CO2 estimates? The IPCC uses:

• Measurements: Buoys and ships measure surface CO2, covering ~10% of the ocean.

• Henry's Law: This rule calculates the dissolution of CO2 based on air levels and water conditions.

• Models: Computers simulate currents, plankton, and chemistry.

• Deep Data: Carbon in deeper waters estimates net absorption.

This method is thorough and robust but limited by data gaps.

Why Is the Confidence Low? The 330–340 billion tons figure used by the IPCC for ocean outgassing may be reasonable. But their estimates for contributions by volcanoes are shaky, and they have no forecast at all for new abiogenic CO2. Why?

• Sparse Data: Deep ocean volcanoes and vents, like Axial Seamount, lack direct CO2 measurements.

• Subduction Uncertainty: A subduction event could release millions or billions of tons, but it isn't easy to track, as CO2 takes months to years to reach the surface.

• Assumptions: Models guess the unstudied areas, with 20–50% errors or greater.

The confidence level is possibly moderate for total flux exchange between the oceans and the atmosphere. However, this is very low compared to the geological sources discussed. The net sink has an approximate uncertainty of 20–30%. Skeptics argue that these gaps may conceal the actual amounts and the role of natural CO2.

Why It Matters

These uncertainties affect climate views. If geological CO2 emissions are underestimated, natural geological and volcanic cycles might outweigh human impact, supporting skeptics. If CO2's warming effect is small, factors such as volcanism or gravitational auto-compression could dominate the global climate. Either way, poor data clouds sound predictions and public policies.

The ocean floor, a frontier, needs much more study. Programs like NOAA's Vents Program are progressing, albeit slowly. Better data could clarify this debate.

Looking

Ahead. We need:

• More Sensors: Underwater tools to measure deep ocean CO2.

• Better Models: Accounting for slow geological CO2 release.

• Exploration: Mapping the ocean floor.

This collaboration focused on Earth's geological CO2, excluding biosystems and human sources, highlighting its uncertainty.

Conclusions

First, Earth's geology may recycle very old, sequestered CO2 at any time or not at all over unknown periods. Then the Earth might also produce unknown quantities of newly manufactured abiogenic CO2, of unknown amounts and time scales. However, our understanding of this extent, especially in the oceans, is very limited. The IPCC's estimate of 330–340 billion tons is limited to "ocean-air exchange" and is a best estimate with medium confidence. Secondly, their meager estimates for volcanic contributions are generally limited and of low confidence. These uncertainties in the geological data only fuel the ongoing debates about climate change.

For these reasons, we must reject both of the IPCC "Cornerstone Assumptions," which are:

• First, while reasonably accurate measurements are made on the human-made levels of CO2, the estimate of geologic/volcanic/synthetic CO2 amounts appears to have confidence levels varying from very low to medium at best.

• Second, we must also reject the IPCC's assumption that, before the onset of the Industrial Revolution, a natural annual equilibrium existed between CO2 sources and sinks that allegedly prevented "excess CO2 " from accumulating in the atmosphere. Therefore, all of the increased CO2 above the "equilibrium" level of 280 ppm must not be attributed to human-made CO2.

• Based on current IPCC estimates, the 2024 residual CO2 imbalance in the atmosphere appears to be 19.5 Gt in total, and the human-made portion is 1.0 Gt, or 1%. [iii]

Sources and References:

1. Kerrick, D. M., & Connolly, J. A. D. (2001). "Metamorphic devolatilization of subducted marine sediments and the transport of volatiles into the Earth's mantle." Nature, 411(6835), 293–296.

https://www.nature.com/articles/35077056 Overview: This study examines the abiogenic production of CO2 during subduction, where marine sediments (e.g., carbonates) are subjected to high temperatures and pressures. The authors model metamorphic reactions, such as decarbonation (e.g., limestone breaking down into CO2 and other compounds), demonstrating that significant CO2 can be generated in the mantle wedge and released through arc volcanism.

2. Marty, B., & Tolstikhin, I. N. (1998). "CO2 fluxes from mid-ocean ridges, arcs, and plumes." Chemical Geology, 145(3-4), 233–248.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009254197001459

Overview: This paper estimates CO2 fluxes from mid-ocean ridges (like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge) and subduction zone arcs, including abiogenic contributions. It discusses how mantle-derived CO2, formed through reactions involving carbon-bearing minerals and silicates, is released via volcanic and hydrothermal activity. The study estimates global volcanic CO2 emissions at ~0.3–0.6 billion tons per year, with a portion being abiogenic.

3. Kelemen, P. B., & Manning, C. E. (2015). "Reevaluating carbon fluxes in subduction zones, what goes down, mostly comes up." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(30), E3997–E4006. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1507889112

Overview: This study examines carbon cycling in subduction zones, showing that much of the carbon (including carbonates) subducted is released as CO2 through metamorphic reactions, rather than being stored long-term in the mantle. It highlights abiogenic CO2 production via decarbonation and dissolution under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions.

4. Fischer, T. P. (2008). "Fluxes of volatiles (H2O, CO2, N2, Cl, F) from arc volcanoes." Geochemical Journal, 42(2), 151–163.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275838245_Fluxes_of_volatiles_H2O _CO2_N2_Cl_F_from_arc_volcanoes#:~:text=Abstract%20and%20Figures,vol atiles%20during%20the%20subduction%20processes.

Overview: This paper quantifies volatile emissions, including CO2, from arc volcanoes in subduction zones. It notes that some CO2 is abiogenic, formed through mantle reactions involving carbon-bearing fluids and minerals, and estimates the contributions of arc volcanoes to global CO2 (~0.1–0.2 billion tons/year).

5. CO2 and H2S in Abiogenic Hydrocarbon Synthesis and the Emergence of Prebiological States. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/ast.2024.0042

Aleksandr Malyshev and Lidiia Malysheva

6. Book: "What Really Causes Global Warming", by Peter LWard. Overview: How high-silicate explosive volcanic eruptions cause global cooling, and how basaltic effusive eruptions cause global warming.

7. Discussion author with AI Bot Grok 3, see: https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg%3D%3D_680fed17-0745-41e4-adfdcbb10115cfc3 8. Subglacial volcanoes. Subglacial volcanoes as an ice sheet proxy. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacial-geology/antarctic-icesheet/subglacial-volcanoes/

8.Fire below, ice above: volcanoes, glaciers, and sea level rise. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/oceans/fire-below-ice-above-volcanoes-glaciersand-sea-level-rise/ . Overview: New observations and refined modeling allow scientists to peer beneath the ice of Greenland and Antarctica.

9. Newly discovered Greenland plume drives thermal activities in theArctic. By Tohoku University, 7 Dec 2020. https://www.labmanager.com/news/newlydiscovered-greenland-plume-drives-thermal-activities-in-the-arctic24576#:~:text=They%20discovered%20a%20flow%20of,are%20buried%20in%20 the%20snow. Overview:

Endnotes

[i] and [iii] SeeAnnexA, Tables 2 and 4 of the article "Comparison of CO2 Sources and Sinks using IPCC data. More questions than answers linger". By Terigi Ciccone and Gerald Ratzer, Revised 30 June 2025, https://www.allaboutenergy.net/?view=article&id=4382:comparison-of-co2sources-and-sinks-using-ipcc-data&catid=212&highlight=WyJjaWNjb25lIl0=

[ii] Mid-Atlantic Ridge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-Atlantic_Ridge Overview: The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is a mid-ocean ridge (a divergent or constructive plate boundary) located along the floor of theAtlantic Ocean, and part of the longest mountain range in the world.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.