98 6
JANUARY 14, 2021 | The Jewish Home OCTOBER 29, 2015 | The Jewish Home
Political Crossfire
Pelosi Once Again Plays Politics with Impeachment By Marc A. Thiessen
H
ouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi is, once again, playing politics with impeachment. On CBS Newsâ â60 Minutesâ on Sunday, she warned that President Donald Trump has to be removed because he poses an imminent threat to the country. We have a âderanged, unhinged, dangerous president of the United States, and weâre only a number of days until we can be protected from him,â said Pelosi, D-Calif. Well, if Trump is that dangerous, why didnât she call the House back immediately to pass articles of impeachment, and then challenge the Senate to come back into session and hold a trial this week? Instead, she is waiting until Wednesday â a full week after the Capitol riot â to hold a House vote. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., suggested this weekend that Pelosi could wait until well into the Biden presidency before sending impeachment articles to the Senate. âLetâs give President-elect [Joe] Biden the 100 days he needs to get his agenda oďŹ and running,â Clyburn said. âAnd maybe we will send the articles sometime after that.â Pelosi is politicizing what are very serious and weighty questions: Did the president of the United States engage in impeachable conduct? And is it prudent to impeach him when the Constitution will remove him from oďŹce in a matter of days? On the ďŹrst question, the answer is clearly yes. It is true that, as some legal scholars have pointed out, Trump would never be convicted of incitement in a criminal court. As former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy, who successfully prosecuted âblind sheikhâ Omar Abdel Rahman for incitement, told me, âAn incitement case is very difďŹcult in criminal court. ... You have to
intend that a violent crime take place.â McCarthy points out, however, that the issue in impeachment is not criminal liability, but whether the president committed what Alexander Hamilton described as political oďŹenses that call into question his ďŹtness for oďŹce. And by that standard, McCarthy says, what
toral college victory and urged them to march on the Capitol. He might not have intended for his supporters to storm the building, but he recklessly stoked a throng of people who did just that â and ďŹve deaths occurred. Instead of immediately rushing to the cameras to call oďŹ his sup-
Trump played with matches and started a forest fire.
Trump did was âclearly an impeachable oďŹenseâ and âa deep betrayal of his obligations as presidentâŚto protect our elections, rather than undermine them, and to protect Congress.â For more than six weeks, Trump ginned up anger among his supporters, telling them they had reelected him in a landslide and that their victory was being stolen from them. He then brought a massive crowd to Washington on the day that Congress was meeting to conďŹrm Bidenâs elec-
porters, Trump sat back and watched them ransack the Capitol. An hour after they had overwhelmed police barricades, Trump poured gasoline on the ďŹre, tweeting, âMike Pence didnât have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country.â (Indeed, Trump never even bothered to call to see whether the vice president was safe.) Only at 2:38 p.m. did Trump feebly tweet urging the already violent mob to âstay peaceful!â It was not until 4:17 p.m.
â nearly three hours into the assault â that Trump ďŹnally posted a video telling his supporters âyou have to go home now.â Even then, he spent more time claiming his âlandslideâ election was âstolenâ than calling for calm. And while Trump might not have intended to provoke violence, he intended to send a crowd to coerce Pence into committing an unconstitutional act by invalidating electoral votes cast for Biden. That is an abuse of power. Trump told the crowd that âall Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify, and we become president.â They swarmed into the Capitol chanting âHang Mike Penceâ when he refused. Trump played with matches and started a forest ďŹre â that makes him culpable for the death and destruction that ensued, even if he didnât intend to set the ďŹre. The second question is more diďŹcult. If Trump had nine months left in oďŹce, rather than nine days, there is no doubt that he should be removed from oďŹce. It is unclear, however, whether at this late date, an impeachment trial is in the countryâs best interests. It would divide the country, turn Trump into a martyr, and keep him front and center for months into Bidenâs term. There is also the risk that he might be acquitted, because some Republicans might decide they cannot convict a president who has already left oďŹce, while others fear alienating constituents who just voted to give Trump a second term. Trump could then claim vindication. The best thing might be to let him simply leave in ignominy. But Pelosi seems to care more about politics and retribution than what is best for the country. (c) 2020, Washington Post Writers Group