- Unification of the forces acting on the macro and microstructure of the universe.

- Unification of the forces acting on the macro and microstructure of the universe: - Alternative proposition.

J.R. Silva Bittencourt

Warning The following text is under the responsibility of the author. It manifests an alternative point of view, which is not officially recognized (yet), raising questions that involve the isolated observer and the participation of his memory in the interpretation of the events that occur around him. Unexplained themes from the viewpoint of science, such as the orientation of forces in space-time and the constancy of the speed of light, find a curious theoretical explanation when one considers that for us there is only what can be remembered.

- Unification of the forces acting on the macro and microstructure of the universe: - Alternative proposition.

There is no possibility of unifying the forces acting on the astronomical scale and those that manage movement at the subatomic level, without the introduction of the isolated observer figure in this context. This is due to the finding that things only come into existence when they can be remembered by us. In reality, our point of view matters very little to the universe around us, but it is our memory that gives meaning to the events that take place around us. It may be that a distant star is shining in the sky and its light has not yet impressed us enough to know, from its brightness, that it exists in practice. What is common in the way we interact with reality, both on the astronomical scale and the level of atoms, is the principle of tracking information. That is, whether you are behind a powerful telescope or with your eyes fixed on the lenses of an optical microscope, you still need to rely on the local scattering of light to see the particles. What we see is the light scattered by the particle, not itself. In the process of observation one does not take into account the difference of time that light would have required to travel through the

space that separates us from a star, in relation to the very small time that separates us from our preparation when viewed under a microscope. In this form of approach it is possible to note the similarity between the two forms of infinity. The time lag that separates us from the subatomic particles tends to infinity, a limit that will never be reached, at least when it comes to our point of view. It is that without the measurable time, our memory would lose its meaning. Therefore, from certain limits of time contraction at that level, the particles disappear from our vision because they can not be remembered, even if they continue there. On the other hand, the expansion of time, which gives support to this memory, also tends to the infinite in the macrostructure, without ever reaching it. This means that once the zero mark of time was always in the position of the observer and not in the position of the observed, if he moved his physical position in space he would be taking with him the center of observation. This does not mean that the observer would be at the center of the universe, but would certainly always remain in the present moment. The expansion of time, once suspended in the direction of infinity, presupposes, in theory, that the most remote places of the universe could be reached by the

observer as long as he remained above the center, which logically does not happen in practice due to physical limitations.

To attempt to illustrate the action of forces in space-time, from the point of view of the observer, we will examine the relation of the Sun to its planets, and how gravity would be managing their orbits.

For the Reverse Sight Theory we would be living with two forms of reality. To one of these we call primary reality, from which all the information arrives to us. The other reality, called secondary, is that which is perceived by our senses with delay, and is therefore the result of the decoding of information originating from the primary reality. In principle, the current events in the two realities should coincide, but due to a principle of exclusion of direct access to the primary reality, it is not certain if this happens in practice. Any form of information decoding takes time, and time is the key to the puzzle. As our memory depends on time, or nothing could be assessed in real time, it seems that we are definitely excluded from the primary reality in a curious form of exile. Our physical body, where our brain is included, is in primary reality, even without knowing it. However, what good would it be if this place were a paradise of delights and could

not be taken advantage of? In other words, what would paradise be like if there were no one with consciousness to make sense of it? But a form of consciousness supported by memory would have, as a burden, temporal exile.

For the planets the density, assumed by the solar mass, would be more important than its own mass. If the observer could be aware of variations in the density of the Sun, he could see an entirely different picture than usual. Normally, the Sun travels on the ecliptic during the day, from east to west, with no measurable variation in its mass and volume.

Sunlight seems to be hiding possible variations in solar density. Consequently, the mass of our star would be linked to a single constant curvature in space. This single curvature should simultaneously manage the orbit of all eight planets in solar system plus Pluto, which seems a little strange. The intensity of the light would also decay in proportion to the distances in which the planets are placed, due to the fact that the local brightness of our star would be conserved over time. If the variations of solar density were visually sensitive, we could know from the variation of the volume of our star whether the Earth would be in a course of approach or distance; if at this moment the Earth would be passing in

perihelion or aphelion. Of course, this does not happen in practice.

If the sun and other stars did not emit particles of light into space, we could not know about their existence. Therefore, the one responsible for the problem of the unique curvature of space would be cosmic radiation. It would have assumed the role of being the messenger of space, but would be fulfilling its mission with reservations, or with a few secrets kept under lock and key. Johannes Kepler was able to unravel one of them, that, contrary to what was supposed in his days, the orbits of the planets would form an ellipse over time, not a circle. It is known that the circle is directly connected to light and its harmonic motion. That is, in the case of light the harmonic movement, derived from the circular, could be unfolded in the form of cyclic waves. The finding that the Sun does not vary its mass and volume over time is in accordance with the suggestion that this might be one of the consequences of leveling the energetic extremes of the Maxwell spectrum, before the manifestation or arrival of the light of the Sun to Earth. The subject has already been discussed previously but would be related to the light cone of the future of the Sun. Although the Sun acts as a point source emitting

circular and concentric light waves, some theorists of the subject have hypothesized that the waves of light would overlap over time, resulting in the formation of a straight cone. In the case of the Sun, time would have been held for eight minutes until light reached Earth. However, the time it takes in the future can not be measured directly, as it is an imaginary time. One can make cogitations on the time spent by the light within that cone, based on its limited speed. Although it is a justifiable thought, assessing the time in the future through light is not scientifically supported, and it is a form of indirect evaluation. The three-dimensional cone itself would have a dubious existence. Anyway, this raises an old discussion about what the third dimension of space would be. Well, if the superposition of waves in time were to result in the third dimension of space and in the formation of a cone of light of the future, time, whether imaginary or not, would be prior to our sense of space depth. Therefore, it would undo the depth and assume the status of being the third dimension of space and not the fourth, as is usually accepted.

Let us suppose that the space blade was initially two-dimensional and curved by receiving the direct influence of the solar mass. With this, we would have

to rely on the addition of imaginary time influencing the depth of space and the transient retention of light. If space had the power to communicate directly to us the influence of the solar mass, we might think that this would generate gravity directly by causing a curvature in space. However, in the case of the planets and most notably on Earth, where there is a conscious observer, the curvature effect does not manifest instantaneously. According to some physicists, the event would be reported on Earth after eight minutes, depending on the waves of gravity. These waves would travel at the limited speed of light. Brian Greene cites the consequences of the sudden disappearance of the Sun: "- The gravitational perturbation that results from the disappearance of the Sun will form a wave, which will travel through space-time in the same way as a stone thrown into a lake causes waves, traveling on the surface of Water. We would not feel a modification of our orbit around the Sun until this wave reaches Earth. Einstein calculated that gravity waves travel exactly at the speed of light". Since nothing could travel faster than light, physicists concluded that Newton would be wrong in claiming that gravity would act instantaneously and at a

distance. For his part, Einstein was cautious and would have made no comment on that.

In any case, it should be noted that the space would have remained outside the process of communicating the events that would be occurring within the light cone of the future of the Sun and other stars, because it was dependent on a messenger. In the case of gravity waves they only exist in theory, because there would be no motion in a place in space where time could not be measured, because Newton's laws would not apply there. This is the case of the calculation of forces and acceleration, or gravity and its centripetal result.

The Reverse Sight Theory (RST) project beckons with the possibility that the absence of time, within the cone of future of any events, would be a direct consequence of the partial leveling of the energetic extremes of radiation, contracting time at subliminal levels. From there, the subsequent positions, occupied in time by the same particle, could not be measured. By translating this form of thought we came to Brian Greene's effect, that gravity waves would move in space in a manner similar to the waves that would be formed when a stone was thrown into a lake, traveling on the surface of the water. If time contracted beyond certain limits, still

far from absolute zero, we could not count on the existence of real moving waves. Therefore, in order for these waves to be evidenced, there would have to be an inversion in the direction of the arrow of time, and it would begin to expand thereafter. At this moment, gravity waves, if detected indirectly, would already be part of our past. Thus, it can be said that both Newton and Einstein would be correct in their way of thinking. The instantaneousness of the force of gravity and its action at a distance, raised by Newton, would be justified by the retention of time in the future. Or, put another way, the zero mark of time would have migrated virtually from the Sun to the position of the isolated observer, from where it never left again, and this time passed to expand in the direction of our past. You can not safely say that light would have shifted from the Sun's position on the speed of light, because no movement of any kind can be measured in the absence of measurable time.

So, at least when it comes to our point of view, the light of the Sun would always have been at our entire disposal, to be followed only in the direction of the past. To act continuously, our memory needs the constant presence of information.

Let us consider that our memory is totally dependent on the scattering of the photons, to

remember what is around it. Or, put another way, that in order to be sighted the particles would first have to be illuminated. In this case, one must not forget that the light waves disturb the position of the particle, in an inescapable way. This is predicted at the uncertainty principle, and the perturbation would be associated with changes in the geometry of the atomic structure. An electron, for example, can not be found between two subsequent energy levels.

There are no other ways of visually describing events at that microscopic level, that do not depend on the scattering of some kind of light or beam of particles that we send in that direction. What happens at the very moment when a quantum collides with a free electron escapes any experimental analysis. There would be a void of information at the time of the shock due to the absence of measurable time, as evidenced by Boethe-Geiger's work. They demonstrated that when the quantum spreads, it and the electron struck simultaneously, with no measurable time interval separating them. It seems that we are, at the exact moment of the collision, in the face of a negative process of space stretching being followed by the contraction of time, if that time exists. Without time, one can not measure motion of any kind, according

to the the definition of instantaneous velocity of a particle. Without being able to be remembered, the particle disappears from our physical reality or assumes an uncertain position. It is as if the light were absorbed transitorily by the particle itself, in a form of negative work similar to that which occurs in an implosion. If we dared ask where the electron could be found before the quantum scattering or at the moment of the shock, we would find no answer.

It would be passing through its stationary stage, without receiving or emitting radiation, somewhere uncertain between two subsequent levels of energy of the atom. Without the concurrence of the light the information becomes inaccessible, even being there.

These characteristics are compatible with the first phase of the harmonic motion of light. The first clue is that the inexistence of time, between the appearance of the particle and the light scattered by it, could be interpreted as the result of our technical inability to measure this time directly. That is to say, time would exist, even if contracted at subliminal levels and without allowing its direct measurement.

In any case, we might think that the contraction of time was a consequence of the negative stretching of space around the particle, which would retain light temporarily. If the perturbation of the particle were

associated with a direct curvature in space, the observer would wait for the scattering of the light to access the information. Unfortunately for the observer, the contraction of time would also be associated with a form of partial leveling between the extremes of maximum and minimum energy of the orbit of our electron, fusing space and light. That is, our dependence on the space messenger would have led us to the conclusion that both would form a whole, or one thing. There would be no further distinction between the behavior of light and that of space itself. So when the light spreads nothing different would be noticed in space, keeping the atomic structure balanced. It is said that the electron would have given the quantum leap, immediately entering the decay phase to the lower energy level.

A stretching of space, which is described through light, could be considered the result of a negative work. In the first phase of its harmonic motion, light would tell us that the force would point in the opposite direction to the stretching of space, and there would be a predominance of elastic potential energy over kinetics. If there was movement, it would be retarded. This suggests that the electron would assume a hypothetical inverse movement, and toward the nucleus of the atom. The

extreme limits of elastic potential energy would be the insurmountable barrier, which would prevent the electron from colliding with the nucleus. This could be interpreted differently, saying that the nuclear mass would be generating antigravity force in this first phase of the harmonic movement of the light, or in the opposite direction to the movement of approach of the electron. Thus, being undetectable in its steady state, the electron could assume the transient characteristics of an antiparticle. The maximum limits of the approximation of the electron relative to the nucleus would be established by the contraction of time, due to the principle of complementarity between space and time, predicted in the theory of relativity.

Second phase of the harmonic motion of light.

Contrary to what would happen in the previous phase of stretching, the time would become abruptly measurable after the photons scatter. The space described by the light, apparently forming a whole with it, should contract, followed by the dilation of time. However, the second phase of the harmonic motion shows the characteristic distance of the previous phase, being accompanied by the acceleration of the movement, predicted for the

current phase. Hostage of his memory, the observer concludes that the electron, when sighted, would be at the maximum acceleration of its movement and at the distal point of its orbit. The scattering of photons would be the only recordable phase in the whole process, so it becomes virtually continuous. It is difficult for us to accept that our consciousness might be acting in a discontinuous way, as suggested in the photoelectric effect, simply because nothing exists outside it. The wavelengths of light dissociate and become traceable, giving rise to the emergence of the Doppler effect and to the speed of light as being parts of an information package, open outside the real time of the events that would have given rise to it.

Application of the behavior of the atomic structure to the solar system.

Once the macrostructure was considered a inverse mirror image of events that would have originated at the subatomic level, and considering that the way of tracking the light is the same in both cases, without depending on the distances involved in each of them, we could adopt some atomic orbital effects for a better understanding of planetary motion. This form of comparison runs into some

difficulties, which we could try to remove with this new way of approaching infinity, in which the role of the observer becomes relevant. For example, when a quantum collided with a free electron and spread, the particle would tend to spiral toward the nucleus, due to the action of the Coulomb forces. Of course, this does not happen in practice and in the case of the atomic structure, because the size of the whole atomic structure revolves around four times the size of its nucleus. If the electrons spiraled to collision, the atom would have the same dimensions as its nucleus.

It would be useful to extend the behavior of the electrons of the atomic cloud to the case of the Sun and its planets. Just as in order to see electrons, we need the arrival of light to know Sun existence. Thus, we would have to take into account the process of quantization, to which the light of the Sun would have to be submitted before the spreading, so that it can only be apprehended by our limited senses. In space-time any form of measurable energy is packaged or quantized. Quantization provides for a virtual leveling of energy and the passage of light through a stationary phase, due to the expected contraction of time in the process. This would prevent us from directly sizing changes in the

geometry of space, as is the case with its curvature.

Access to information would be possible only with delay and using a form of remote tracking of the light, after the scattering of the photons. The same would be true for the possible direct effect of the solar mass on the space, curving it.

It would be important for us to know the stages of higher or lower density that our star might be experiencing over time, for two basic reasons: 1.

Density would influence the curvature of space, even without the necessity of varying the total mass of star; 2. A denser mass would curl more space around it, and retain more time than an equal but less dense mass.

The proof that we do not have direct access to these data on solar density, when we use the light traced, is the circular and uniform motion we see projected into the celestial vault managing the movement of all stars. Another clue is the finding that the sun moves over the ecliptic, throughout the day, always retaining the same mass and the same volume. A constant curvature of space would imply the same retention of time in the future, or within the cone of light of the Sun. This is the case of the eight minutes that separate us from our star. Moreover, it

would be impossible to assert, through the use of solar radiation, whether a planet would at any given moment pass in aphelion or perihelion.

If we tried to escape from the apparent circular orbit, which we would be led by this theoretical leveling of light within the cone of the Sun, it would be good advice to take a look at the behavior of the electrons in their movement towards the nucleus, but not around it. It would be expected that the mass of the Sun, as well as that of the nucleus, by stretching the space around it would predispose to a late accommodation of light to the curvature, then formed. This negative work on the space messenger, the light, would drive the planet away in the direction of aphelion, since the force generated would point in the opposite direction to the stretching of space. However, when analyzing the behavior of the electron in the atomic structure, the retention of light and the passage of the particle by its stationary stage would suggest that the movement of the particle would be in the direction of the nucleus, occupying, without direct registration, the level of lower kinetic energy, more internal and just below. This is due to the finding that during the stretching of space, corresponding to the first phase of the harmonic movement of light, the work done

would be negative and there would be an increase of the elastic potential energy. That is, if you compared the space to an elastic strip, it would now be in its stretching phase. As the force points in the opposite direction, the inversion of expectations, associated with light, would suggest that the nuclear force would be ahead of the electron's motion. This would be an antigravity orientation of the nuclear force which, in addition to preventing the electron from colliding with the nucleus, would attribute to the steady state of the electron the positive characteristics of a mysterious antiparticle, impossible to be traced in spacetime due to light retention. In the case of the Sun, the negative stretching work could drive the planet away in the direction of aphelion, but this movement could not be directly described because it would be accompanied by the contraction of time. Without measurable time there is no movement, which would be incompatible with the presence of electromagnetic waves within the cone of the future of the Sun. The planet would gradually occupy the distal point or the maximum potential energy of its orbit (aphelion). Since there is no measurable movement directly, this would happen without the planet abandoning its place in space.

We have previously commented that the resulting leveling of the energetic extremes of Sunlight, the same light that our memory will use soon, after the inversion in the direction of the time arrow to access the information, would prevent us from recording possible seasonal variations in the curvature of space. Therefore, there is a chance that even conserving its mass the Sun could increase its density in the phase of stretching the space around it, decreasing its volume transiently and pushing the planet to the distal point of its orbit, even without it get out of place. As in the behavior of the nucleus of the atom, the tendency of the planet would be to be always on the route of distancing from the Sun, since the current force in this phase of the harmonic movement would have an antigravity orientation, always pointing in the opposite direction to the stretching of the space. If the density of the Sun or that of our nucleus increased temporarily, Earth and the electron would move farther away. If, on the other hand, the density of both decreases they would move away less, which could be interpreted as a movement of approximation. Another characteristic that would be expected in this first phase is that the planet should assume a delayed movement towards the aphelion. Regarding a possible phase of lower

density to which the solar mass could be subjected, we could predict that the now denser Sun would radiate less light into space, holding back more time within its cone of light of the future.

When it was scattered in the position of the isolated observer on Earth, light would have entered the second phase of its harmonic motion. Now we would be living with the concept of seemingly continuous waves; with the Doppler effect and with the speed of light, all now being parts of the same package, previously packed inside the cone of the Sun. The observer enters the dependence of his memory. What can not be remembered, as is the case with the cone of sunlight, does not exist in practice. The direction of the arrow of time is reversed and it points continuously in the direction of our past, since for us there is only what can be remembered.

In the case of Earth and its elliptical orbit, the planet, it is deduced, would now be accelerating constantly towards the Sun, accompanying the relaxation or contraction of space. Do not forget that we are considering, as is common in cosmological practice, that light and space would be forming a whole, or a single thing. For this reason,

it is customary to evaluate the curvature of space by the deviations to which light would be subjected, by virtue of the celestial bodies of considerable masses.

If space bends, light bends in the same way, and vice versa. In this second phase of the harmonic movement of light, that of positive restoration of force, the concept of gravity emerges as the only force capable of acting on an astronomical scale, at a distance and instantaneously. This is due to the inversion in the direction of the time arrow next to the observer, which would have virtually displaced the zero time frame from the position of the Sun to the position of the Earth. That is, time would be contained within ourselves by a principle of exclusion of direct access to our future, or what would occur within the cone of future light of events.

The Sun would be passing through its lower density stage, which can not be proven, by the lack of direct access to a light that would have been previously retained, being submitted to a theoretical process of energy leveling. As discussed earlier, the second phase of the harmonic motion of light would be exposing the previous phase, or stretching. This first phase, however, would appear to be increased by the acceleration of the movement, which would be an expected feature of the second phase. By this we

can say that the planet would continue on the route of distancing from the Sun, even as it was approaching the star during the contraction phase of space and the dilation of time, in which the curvature of space was gradually undoing, accompanying the decrease of the density of the solar mass. The increase in volume by the Sun or the fall of the density of its mass would coincide with the increase in the force of gravity, which would be pulling the planet toward our star. As this would be related to the decrease in the curvature of the space around the Sun, we could say that the gravitational force would be increasing due to a decrease in the force of contrary orientation, also known as antigravity force. In this case, the planet, even without leaving its place, would accelerate because of a decrease in the elastic potential energy associated with the previous phase of space stretching. It seems contradictory, but all this stems from our dependence on the action of cosmic radiation as the messenger of space, without which we would have no news of the existence of the Sun and the distant galaxies. In the case of the Earth and the other planets they would always be in a route of distancig from the Sun, even when they were passing through the perihelion, the most proximal point of

their orbits. As the average curvature of space would keep them at a relatively safe distance, under normal conditions there would be no way for the planets to collide with the Sun. When our star passed through the red giant stage we might suppose that even in the presence of an increase in its force gravitational, the slightest bend in the space around the star would continue to push the planet away from the center. This thought runs counter to the current view, which predicts that the inner planets should be swallowed up by the Sun at the very end of its existence.

Another noteworthy consideration of this form of analyzing the geometry of space would be to compare it with the current cosmological view, which does not take seriously the role of the isolated observer and his memory in the context of events.

For example, the theoretical leveling of the energetic extremes of the radiation within the cone of light of the future of the Sun until its scattering, would prevent us from noticing possible variations in the solar density or mass. In our normal range of life, of at most 90 years, a little more a little less, the Sun should not present significant variations in its mass. However, who assures us that, over the course of a year, the Sun was not going through varying

stages in the density of its mass? If this were to happen, even without being able to demonstrate them in practice, we ask: - Would the transient variations in solar density not influence the curvature of the surrounding space in a variable way? It is often said that Saturn is so less dense that if it could be placed in a pool, the planet would float.

Compared to Earth, our planet would go straight to the bottom of the pool.

The problem with conserving mass and solar density, as well as the same curvature in space over time, is that they bring in a series of unfolding. This is the case of circular and uniform motion. For a long time it was believed that this movement ruled the planetary orbits, with Earth occupying the center of the Universe. If a planet were to perform a circular orbit, there would be no aphelion or perihelion. The Earth and the other planets would always remain the same distance from the star, without the movement of distance or approach.

Another nefarious consequence would be the relation of gravity, a force of continuous attraction, to the fate of the planets. If there were no maximum limit of approach for each planet in relation to the Sun, as the Sun grew older it would increase in volume as it passed through the red giant stage.

This, according to astronomers, would be accompanied by an increase in solar gravity, which would cause the star to swallow, one by one, the planets of innermost orbits. The view presented by RST and throughout this work is more optimistic. It was seen, in the text just above, that a decrease in solar density and an increase in its volume would be followed by an increase in the gravitational force and acceleration of the planet. However, a maximum limit of approximation would be established directly by the stretching of the space that we related to the solar mass, acting as antigravity force. This stretching could be larger or smaller, depending on the density assumed by the mass of the star. That is, even if due to the smaller stretching of the space the antigravity acted less intensely when the Sun went through its red giant stage, increasing in return its gravitational attraction, the planet, even accelerating, would be constantly being pushed towards the aphelion or to the point of maximum distance from its orbit. Gravity appears, in this case, acting only as a secondary restoring force, which is in accordance with the theory of harmonic motion performed by light. The problem is interpretative, because the observer is dependent on the messenger

of space (not space directly) to make considerations about the existence and behavior of stars.

Inversion of the arrow of time into the microstructure of the universe and the emergence of the mysterious antiparticle.

When we analyzed the atomic structure through light, that is, in a secondary form and after the particles were illuminated, we would inevitably lead to a circular and uniform movement, ruling their orbits. This means that in terms of particle motion, nothing new would happen. They do not approach the core nor move away, always turning at the same speed and acceleration, always keeping a safe distance. This picture is very suspicious.

In this work it is taken into account that before being spread the light would need to be packed or quantized, or could not have its presence recorded by the observer. For RST this process would involve changes in the geometry of the space which, at least until the light scattering, could not be measured directly. The thesis suggests that the quantization could simulate a curvature in the space around the particle, generating a perturbation that would result in the uncertainty of the position or the speed of the same. In the process there would be a gradual

contraction of time, until it would lose its characteristics of direct measurability. With that, the particle would disappear. In the case of the electron, although the light was already there, the darkness would take its place. The energetic extreme limits of the light would be partially leveled together, for example, the approach between the ultraviolet and the infrared. Light would assume the function of being the messenger of space, and during packaging it would be prepared to provide access to information as soon as the spreading occurred. In the light quantization phase, the space would be being shielded for direct access. The effects that will be described through light would necessarily have to take into account its harmonic motion, due to the involvement of conservative forces, which are usually described in the mass-spring assembly. For example, we used to interpret that when space is stretched, as in the case of the inflationary phase of the universe, the event would be accompanied by an acceleration of the movement of galaxies. In the case of light, the stretching of the spring of the set would correspond to the first phase of its harmonic movement and, unlike what would be expected, there would be a predominance of the elastic potential energy over the kinetics. That is, the motion to be

described by the light would be delayed. This is because, in the case of harmonic motion, the force points in the opposite direction to that of the stretching of the elastic spring. Note the importance of separating the behavior of space and the very light it houses, as in the case of stars. In cosmological practice this has become impossible.

One can cite the example of the observation of the position of the stars, photographed before and after the eclipse of 1919 and that came to confirm the predictions of Einstein on the action of the masses on the space. What went unnoticed by all was the detail that whoever allowed us to describe the curvature of space around the Sun, and the change in the position of the stars in the background, would have been the light. Space does not radiate anything that could free it from the darkness. In this process of interpretation, it seems that we fuse the behavior of space with that of light itself. This can be seen, too, in Einstein's statement, that gravity would be able to attract light, which is a form of energy and not mass.

Let us suppose that, in theory, light was temporarily retained in the process of forming the curvature of space by the solar mass. In this case, we would be left without information on the time it

might have taken for the curvature of space to complete. Without time there would be no measurable movement, and light waves would not exist for all purposes. Thus, we could not superimpose them, as they moved away from the source, to allow the cone of light of the future of the Sun to form. Our star's light could have been gradually condensed into the process, without any direct recording. This retention of light, if it merged into space, would suggest the existence of a force and a negative work of space, such as those that accompany an implosion. It would fit into the first phase of the harmonic motion of light, in which there would be a predominance of elastic potential energy. After the light of the distant star had spread out close to the observer, allowing him to evaluate the deviation it would have suffered in passing near the Sun, any alteration of the geometry of space would be nullified by the previous leveling of the light. The change seen in the Doppler would be only a three-dimensional image projected by light in the celestial vault and in our past, in the second phase of its harmonic motion. Since the beginning of the time counting would have migrated from the Sun to the position of the observer, due to the exclusion of access to light before its scattering, the apparent

reversal in the direction of the arrow of time led us to the idea that starlight would be arriving of our past. Therefore, cosmic radiation is now considered a background radiation. Being discontinuous due to its cyclic behavior, quantized light could not be used as an instrument to evaluate the cone of the future of any event. This detail is usually overlooked, which is evident in the conclusion that the light of the big bang is coming from our past and not from our future. This stems from the assumption that cosmic radiation would be formed by continuous waves. To our point of view doesn’t matter, in this case, whether the wave was starting from the source or coming to it. The attitude would be justifiable because, as has been commented previously, to interact with the reality around him the observer would depend on his memory. Thus, the first phase of the harmonic motion of light, that of space stretching or quantization, could not be remembered. What remains, as a consequence, is the apparently continuous flux of electromagnetic waves, after the scattering of light. Such thinking would given doubtful support to the remote tracking of cosmic radiation and the use of the Doppler effect.

Santa Maria, RS, Brazil 03/27/2019.