IRJET- Mobility of Collaborative Robots

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 04 | Apr 2021

www.irjet.net

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

MOBILITY OF COLLABORATIVE ROBOTS V.Vigneswaran1, D.Rishi2, K.Aadarsh3, S.RockRichard4 1,2,3,4Student,

Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Tamilnadu 638401 -----------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract: Collective robots (cobots) have been progressively received in ventures to encourage human-robot coordinated effort. Notwithstanding this, it is trying to program cobots for cooperative modern undertakings as the programming has two unmistakable components that are hard to actualize: an instinctive component to guarantee that the activities of a cobot can be formed or modified powerfully by an administrator, and a human-mindful component to help cobots in delivering adaptable and versatile practices reliant on human accomplices. In this paper, an outline of shared mechanical situations and programming prerequisites for cobots to execute successful joint effort is given. At that point, definite audits on cobot programming, which are ordered into correspondence, streamlining, and learning, are led. Furthermore, a huge hole between cobot programming actualized in industry and in research is recognized, and research that runs after overcoming this issue is pinpointed. At long last, the future headings of cobots for modern shared situations are delineated, including expected purposes of expansion and improvement.

Keyword: Collaborative Robot, Cobot, Synergic Robot 1. Introduction: It’s a collaborative robot. While a conventional modern robot is intended to finish a particular pre-characterized task inside an actual workspace, a cobot is planned from the start to truly cooperate and team up, securely, with people in a common workspace. To their costly, unbendable, and complex robot cousins, cobots are lightweight, smaller, and easy to work; and they won't rip your arm off on the off chance that you get excessively close. The activity of working with somebody to deliver or make something. Which is the specific motivation behind synergistic robots. Notwithstanding, the misconception isn't about the reason or utilization of the robot, yet its usefulness or all the more accurately how it functions. Indeed, a great many people would think, a collective robot is a robot that is utilized without fencing and that can work around people. All things considered, indeed, this makes it community, however, no, it doesn't make it a synergistic robot! You should realize that there are different sorts of cooperative robots and that just, exceptionally, one kind of collective robot can be utilized with no extra security highlights.

The ABB YuMi collaborative robot is controlled using a virtual reality teleoperation system and adapted using a low-cost gripper extension for surgical tools. The design and assessment of three surgical tools used in two mock surgical procedures [1]. To improve the positioning accuracy of collaborative robots, an elastic deformation modeling method of manipulator robots is proposed. This approach is able to consider the flexibility of robot modules comprehensively and can compensate for the elastic deformation caused by external wrenches and the deadweight of the robot in addition to possessing advantages of low computational complexity, easy modification as well as high real-time [2].

The problem of maximizing the throughput of sensory data sharing in collaborative robots. This data sharing is different from the transmissions in conventional mobile networks due to the real-time sharing requirement and the vicinity sharing pattern. To maximize the dynamic environment, a novel adaptation method AdaSharing based on control theory jointly adapts the combination of packet rate and transmission power according to the feedback of throughput [3]. The Control technique for collaborative robots is presented. The featured controller allows a safe human-robot interaction through energy and power limitations, assuring passivity through energy tanks. The proposed controller is evaluated with a KUKA LWR 4+ arm in a co-manipulation environment [4].

A smart hand gesture recognition experimental set up for collaborative robots using a Faster R-CNN object detector to find the accurate position of the hands in the RGB images taken from a Kinect v2 camera. experiments show that the best model accuracy and Fl-Score are achieved by the complete model without face detection [5]. Collision detection framework (CollisionNet) based on a deep learning approach. A deep neural network model to learn robot collision signals and recognize any occurrence of a collision. This data-driven approach unifies feature extraction from highdimensional signals and the decision processes [6]. Simulation and programming of collaborative robots (cobots). The use of these devices and software with novice or inexperienced users. In this novice users to perform simple pick-andplace tasks under varying perception and planning capabilities. The goal was to study how small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can effectively utilize cobots in production [7].

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2274

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 04 | Apr 2021

www.irjet.net

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Collision detection and contact force estimation methods without any extra sensors. Firstly, a collision torque observer based on robot dynamics model and generalized momentum. Secondly, the joint friction parameters were identified using a friction torque model in the harmonic gear drive system. Finally, the system model errors were eliminated by observing the collision torque under the theoretical condition [8]. An anticipative robot kinematic limitation avoidance algorithm for collaborative robots. The main objective is to improve the performance and the intuitivity of the physical human-robot interaction.

One obstacle to achieving this goal is the management of limitations such as joint position limitation, singularities, and collisions with the environment. Indeed, in addition to performing a given principal task, human users must pay close attention to the manipulator configuration in order to handle the kinematic limitations [9]. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation control development platform based on Linux CNC and V-rep simulation software. In the real-time Linux system, we build a general-purpose, modular cooperative robot control system; and we establish a robot model in the Vrep. Data communication between them can be achieved through the data interaction module [10].

2.

Types of Collaborative Robot

Cobots are utilized to perform high accuracy errands which are tiring for human administrators, prompting botches.

This lets loose people zero in on added esteem undertakings to offer customers better administrations. This is only one of the numerous advantages of utilizing synergistic instead of conventional robots. Customary robots are introduced in fixed positions, while cobots can be moved about effectively to the most appropriate situation to address the organization's issues. Conventional robots are worked to do only one assignment, while cobots can perform various capacities. Conventional robots supplant laborers in the working environment, while cobots help out specialists in their day by day work.

Hand Guiding, Speed and Separation Monitoring, Power and Force Limiting, Force Limited Features.

2.1

Hand Guiding

This sort of communitarian application is utilized for hand controlling or way instructing. So on the off chance that you need to show ways rapidly for pick and spot applications, for example, you may utilize this sort of use. Notwithstanding, you should see that this sort of cooperation utilizes normal mechanical robots, yet with an extra gadget that 'feels' the powers that the labourer is applying on the robot apparatus. The most famous gadget to accomplish such coordinated effort is a Force Torque Sensor, for example, the Robotiq FT 150. Notice that this sort of gadget will basically peruse powers applied on the robot instrument. This sort of joint effort just applies to the robot while it is playing out this specific capacity, which implies that while the robot is working in its different modes, the robot actually needs to have a shielding set up.

2.2

Speed and Separation Monitoring

Here the environment of the robot is observed by lasers or a dream framework that tracks the situation of the labourers.

The robot will act inside the elements of the wellbeing zones that have been pre-intended for it. On the off chance that the human is inside a specific wellbeing zone, the robot will react with assigned rates (by and large moderate) and stop when the specialist comes excessively close. Along these lines, when the labourers are moving toward the robot, it eases back down, as the labourers approach considerably nearer, the robot eases back down significantly more or stops. The video truly shows how this kind of cooperation is accomplished.

So on the off chance that you are thinking about what's the contrast between a Safety Monitored Stop and Speed and Separation Monitoring, it is very straightforward. A Safety Monitored Stop is the point at which the robot stops since a person or thing has stumbled its wellbeing boundaries. The robot must stand by until the labourer gives it the approval signal before it can continue activities. So it will stand by until it gets criticism to proceed. In the other case, the robot will continually work at whichever speed is assigned by the wellbeing zones decided for it. The wellbeing zones are gradated so the robot produces various responses as indicated by the area of the specialist inside the distinctive security zones may at present bring about a Safety Monitored Stop when the human comes excessively near the robot.

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2275

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 04 | Apr 2021

2.3

www.irjet.net

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Power and Force Limiting

This is the sort of robot that everyone calls a cooperative robot. So truly, this is presumably the most laborer neighborly robot since it can work close by people with no extra security gadgets. The robot can feel irregular powers in its way.

Indeed, it is customized to stop when it peruses an over-burden regarding power. These robots are likewise intended to scatter powers in the event of effect on a wide surface, which is one reason why the robots are rounder. They likewise don't have uncovered engines. A great deal of these robots is guaranteed by outsiders who centre on modern wellbeing for a human-robot coordinated effort. You should see that specialized detail ISO/TS 15066 will be delivered in the not so distant future and will indicate the most extreme powers (N) and energy (J) that can be applied on a human with no mischief. This specialized detail will explain the security necessities for human-robot cooperation for both ordinary modern robots and power restricted communitarian robots.

2.4. Force Limited Features Most importantly the principle highlight of these robots is their capacity to peruse powers in their joints. This permits them to identify when unusual powers are applied to them while they are working. In these circumstances, they can be modified to stop or in some cases invert positions interceding the underlying contact. This implies they can react promptly on the off chance that they come into contact with a human and maybe scatter a portion of the energy moved from the effect.

This element prompts another fascinating element that we have just talked about above; hand directing. Indeed, since these robots can feel drives, you can in a real sense move them and show them positions or ways that they can rehash a short time later. While hand directing assists with the human-robot coordinated effort it doesn't make the robot inherently sheltered. The power restricting highlights should do this.

Promoted as being protected, these robots are unquestionably intended to be more responsive than their mechanical mates. Indeed, their math is rounder, they don't have any sort of squeeze point and more often than not they have disguised their engines and wires, and so forth to make them more minimized. Consequently, the term lightweight robot is now and then concerned with them. A few robots even have an outside 'skin' that permits them to feel their current circumstance yet in addition gives an additional pad in the event of effect.

3. Modeling of Collaborative Robot

Fig. 2 Model of Collaborative robot

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2276

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 04 | Apr 2021

www.irjet.net

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

There are three subsystems that are implemented in this model which you can find in Fig.2. On each time step, if the trajectory scaling switch is on, the changed timestamp is utilized for assessing the ideal joint position, velocity, and acceleration. At that point, the figured torque controller utilizes the controller blocks related to the RigidBodyTree model to follow the desired motion. The derived control input is taken care of into the Sawyer model in Simscape Multibody (where the planar item for associating with the robot is incorporated).

Trajectory Scaling and Desired Motion are the two main blocks in the trajectory scaling subsystem. Nonetheless, when the robot crashes into an unexpected object, the expanding torque and deviance from the arranged trajectory can be dangerous for both the robot and the object. The calculation of the timestamp by introducing a function of the desired motion and measured torque is the main objective of the trajectory function. The function which is explained before controls the speed of the robot's movement and is resolved dependent on the obstruction felt by the robot. If the measured torques are higher than expected, the function is reduced to make the robot delayed down or even go in reverse until the desired forces are accomplished.

The inverse dynamics block with additional components is used to implement the trajectory scaling algorithm which helps to control the speed robot motion and regulate torque values.

4. Simulation and Result

Fig. 3 When the toggle switch is off When the model is simulated when the toggle switch is off; there is an undesired increase in the joint torque and that causes the damage which can be observed in plot 1 of figure 3.

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2277

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 04 | Apr 2021

www.irjet.net

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Fig. 4 When the toggle switch is on In this model, the toggle switch for the trajectory is on; the robot adjusts its motion speed according to the object interference and we can see the reduced torque and reaction forces in the plots which makes the robot have a safe interaction with objects.

5. Conclusion The cobot helps in different tasks like assembly, dispensing, finishing, material handling, material removal, space exploration, and more. Especially in this pandemic, many companies had adopted these cobots to increase their productivity. It can work effectively 24/7 with safe human interaction. This paper explains the modeling and uses of cobot.

6. REFERENCES

[1] Sanchez-Tamayo, N. and Wachs, J.P., 2018, March. Collaborative robots in surgical research: a low-cost adaptation. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 231-232).

[2] Hu, M., Wang, H., Pan, X. and Tian, Y., 2017, December. Research on elastic deformation modeling of collaborative robots. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) (pp. 2462-2467). IEEE.

[3] Kong, L., Chen, X., Liu, X., Xiang, Q., Gao, Y., Baruch, N.B., and Chen, G., 2017. AdaSharing: Adaptive data sharing in collaborative robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(12), pp.9569-9579.

[4] Raiola, G., Cardenas, C.A., Tadele, T.S., De Vries, T., and Stramigioli, S., 2018. Development of a safety-and energyaware impedance controller for collaborative robots. IEEE Robotics and automation letters, 3(2), pp.1237-1244.

[5] Nuzzi, C., Pasinetti, S., Lancini, M., Docchio, F., and Sansoni, G., 2018, April. Deep learning-based machine vision: first steps towards a hand gesture recognition set up for collaborative robots. In 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (pp. 28-33). IEEE.

[6] Heo, Y.J., Kim, D., Lee, W., Kim, H., Park, J., and Chung, W.K., 2019. Collision detection for industrial collaborative robots: a deep learning approach. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(2), pp.740-746.

[7] Pieskä, S., Kaarela, J., and Mäkelä, J., 2018, April. Simulation and programming experiences of collaborative robots for small-scale manufacturing. In 2018 2nd International Symposium on Small-scale Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (SIMS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

[8] Tian, Y., Chen, Z., Jia, T., Wang, A., and Li, L., 2016, December. Sensorless collision detection and contact force estimation for collaborative robots based on torque observer. In 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO) (pp. 946-951). IEEE.

[9]

Campeau-Lecours, A., and Gosselin, C., 2016, October. An anticipative kinematic limitation avoidance algorithm for collaborative robots: Two-dimensional case. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 4232-4237). IEEE.

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2278

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 08 Issue: 04 | Apr 2021

www.irjet.net

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

[10] Tongtong, L., Tao, Y., Zelin, Y., Shuxuan, L., and Jianming, L., 2018, August. Development of Hardware-in-Loop Simulation Platform for Collaborative Robots Based on LinuxCNC and V-rep. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA) (pp. 1323-1328). IEEE.

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2279