International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)
e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 09 | Sep 2020
p-ISSN: 2395-0072
www.irjet.net
The following conclusions were drawn at the end of the study of high rise building with shear wall:1. There is a gradual reduction in time periods for the Perimeter and shear wall flat slab building systems, indicating increase in stiffness. 2. Time Period in case of Shear Wall is the lowest, hence is the most stiff and better option for strengthening the structure. 3. In case of Purely flat slab building, flat slab building with shear wall , flat slab building with perimeter beam , shear wall is the most effective one than other types of modal, effectively reducing top-storey drift and inter storey drifts in both X and Y directions. 4. Top storey deflection in case of flat slab with a shear wall is minimum both in x and y direction. 5. Above all condition it was found that flat slab with shear wall are best for strengthening the structure.
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
Sagar Jamle, Markanday Giri (2019),”A review on response spectrum analysis over flat slab shear wall interface”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 6, Issue 5, Page no. 5173 - 5177. SS. Urunkar, V.M. Bogar and P.S. Hadkar (2018),” Comparative study of codal provision IS 1893 2002 (Part 1): & IS 1893 (part 1): 2016”, “International Journal of advance research in science and engineering” Anil K. Chopara (2003) “Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering” (Prentice Hall of India Private Limited). IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1 General Provisions and Buildings, (Sixth Revision). Pankaj Agrawal and Manish Shrikhande (2018) “Earthquake Resistant design of structure”(PHL Learning Private Limited )
REFERENCES [1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
Ema Chelho, Paulo, Giorgios (2004), ‘’Assessment of the seismic behaviour of RC flat slab building structures’’, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Paper no. 2630 R.P Apostolska., G.S. Necevska-Cvetanovska, J.P. Vetanovska and N. Mircic (2008), “Seismic performance of flat – slab building structural system” The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China. Dr. G Hemalatha and Dr. P Muthupriya (2008), “Response spectrum analysis and design of case study building”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), Volume 8, Page no.1227–1238. H.S Basavaraj & B.A. Rashmi (2015),” Seismic performance of RC flat slab building structural systems”, International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research, Volume 2, Issue 9, Page no. 3069-3084. Dr. S. Kishor Kulkurni and Manvi Amrut (2015), “Cost Comparison between conventional and flat slab structure”, International research journal of engineering and technology (IRJET) ,Volume 2, Issue 9, Page no. 1216-1223 M.V. Sabeena & Meera Pradeep (2016),” Seismic Behaviour of flat slab building strengthened with perimeter beam, Shear wall and beam in Alternate storey”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology) Vol. 5, Issue 8, Page no. 14617-14624. Sruthi K Chandra & M.V. Athira ( 2017) ,”Seismic analysis of flat slab building with shear wall “,International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) Vol. 5, Issue 8, Page no. 1-4. D.K. Shubha, E.J. Lavina & V Indrani (2018),’’Dynamic Analysis of Multi storey RCC building frame with flat slab and grid slab”, International journal of Trend in Scientific and Research and Development, Vol. 2, Issue 4, Page no. 1143 - 1148.
© 2020, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 7.529
|
ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Page 3081
