IRJET- Removal of Iron and Zinc from Steel Industry Effluent using Bentonite Clay as an Adsorben

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

REMOVAL OF IRON AND ZINC FROM STEEL INDUSTRY EFFLUENT USING BENTONITE CLAY AS AN ADSORBENT Aishwarya P B1 and Dr. S Suresh2 1Student,

M.TECH in Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology, Davangere-577004, Karnataka, India 2Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology, Davangere-577004, Karnataka, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------Abstract- Adsorption has been proved to be the best process of water treatment because of its significant advantages. Clays and their minerals are abundant and cheap material successfully used for decades as an adsorbent for removing toxic heavy metals from aqueous solutions. The removal of heavy metals from its solution has been investigated by using adsorption clay material from Davangere district. The review confirmed that clay materials have excellent feasibility in removing different toxic aquatic metal pollutants. Heavy metal ions contained in the industrial waste water are of the most common pollutants found in steel industry. The heavy metal is toxic and can affect human, plant and animal lines and aquatic systems. Therefore the removal of these ions from wastewater. Therefore the removal of these ions from waste water becomes a critical issue from environmental point of view. The adsorbents used are bentonite clay. To study the effect of three variables i.e. clay concentration, pH variation and optimum contact time. Results indicated that the adsorption of heavy metals using bentonite clay that iron has more removal percentage than the zinc.

Key Words: Heavy metals, Wastewater, Polluted water, Bentonite clay, water treatment 1. INTRODUCTION

Expelling of toxins from water bodies turns into a major issue and its additionally a significant procedure and it turns out to be more significant with the expansion of modern exercises (Yakun et.al, 2014). Thus, the removal of overwhelming metals, for instance, cadmium, nickel, chromium, copper, lead, zinc and iron from squander water course of action is required since the rehashed part of these metals in squander water bodies from a large portion of the enterprises (Missana and Garci, 2016). The metals particles in the waste water streams can be effortlessly devoured by sea-going creatures and straightforwardly enters the food web of the people and accordingly it prompts the high wellbeing danger to buyers. Various methods are utilized for the expulsion of substantial metals from the fluid framework is created as film frameworks, filtration, turn around assimilation, synthetic precipitation, particle trade.

And so on since these diverse procedure have the work in benefits and their constraints being used. From the past, adsorption was give off an impression of being different procedure for removing from broke down overwhelming metal from fluid waste (Bayata, 2018). Bentonite dirt is a modest adsorbent for the most part discovered all over Davangere and its adsorption limit is high. The bentonite dirt was taken to expel overwhelming metals from emanating of steel industry in Davangere region. The adsorption procedure is directed from the clump mode. Adsorption process is characterized as the physiochemical partition in which the adsorbate material is moved from the fluid stage to the adsorbent strong surface. The substantial metals are evacuated by the adsorption procedure and it is varified and it has more points of interest contrast with the other treatment strategy for expulsion, for example, particle trade, precipitation and the film based procedure.

What's more, it has more advantages and furthermore incorporate modest and simple accessibility of earth being luxuriously accessible everywhere throughout the world. Earth like adsorbents gives practical option in contrast to customary treatment innovation .Other focal points are basic in activity and expulsion effectiveness Š 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2383

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

is high, high explicit surface territory, fantastic adsorption property, enormous potential for particle trade, nontoxic surface and so forth.The current undertaking work manages the utilization of the Bentonite earth material is utilized as the bio-adsorbent for expelling of overwhelming metals from the effluents from the steel business as a substitute of existing exorbitant business adsorbents. The impact of different boundaries in like manner ideal contact time, mud focus and pH variety impacts the adsorption procedure has appeared in this undertaking.

1.1Study area and data acquisition The water test was accumulated from the steel business specifically ARADYA STEELS Pvt. Ltd. Davanagere. The essential work of this industry is to make mixes and minerals, gets ready and treated prepares, metal and carbon steel wires, etc… this conveys the steel wires of different breadths for different occupations. This industry uses the water for reasons unknown, for instance, cooling, silver covering and to diminish width they use unsaturated fats too, and this waste water was difficult to treat with a negligible exertion, so this endeavor gives the data on ease treatment methodology 2. Methodology 2.1 PLANNING OF ADSORBENT CLAY MATERIAL: Bentonite dirt is gathered from the Davangere locale. Initially, the dirt material is grounded and sieved by a work size < 100. Then it is dried at 120ºC for 4 hours in hot air stove.

2.2 ARRANGEMENT OF HEAVY METAL STANDARD CALIBARATION FOR THE ATOMIC ADSORPTION SPECTOPHOTOMETER All the examples are kept in the cooler and taken out to get the room temperature. AAS light is to be balanced for appropriate frequency of the taken substantial metal i.e., iron and zinc. Standard incline for the substantial metal is looked at by inundating the funnel in reasonable focus standard arrangement of individual overwhelming metal.

2.3 ADSORPTION PROCESS: This procedure is done by utilizing the container test gear and this procedure is completed by: 1. The variety in pH 2. The variety in mud focus 3. The variety in ideal contact time 2.4 VARIETY IN pH: Take the known measure of profluent in the cone shaped flagon. Add the adsorbent which is sieved and dried dirt to the profluent. The pH is changed by including Hcl or NaOH in the arrangement by keeping the mud focus and ideal contact time steady. The arrangement is shaken vivaciously at a speed of 150 rpm in the lab revolving shaker for a given timeframe to arrive at harmony. Then gushing example is blended completely at adequate time for the adsorption procedure to happen. The blend is permitted to settle down the dirt. Then the Irjet Template sample paragraph .Define abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are used in the text, even after they have been defined in the abstract. Abbreviations such as IEEE, SI, MKS, CGS, sc, dc, and rms do not have to be defined. Do not use abbreviations in the title or heads unless they are unavoidable arrangement is sifted through channel paper. Physiochemical investigation is completed for the filtrated arrangement. What's © 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2384

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

more, at long last centralization of overwhelming metals is discover through the nuclear adsorption spectrophotometer and the readings are noted down.

2.5 VARIATION IN CLAY CONCENTRATION: The known measure of profluent is brought down in the recepticle. Add the adsorbent to the emanating in the measuring utencil. The earth fixation is fluctuated by keeping the pH and ideal consistent time steady. Then arrangement is shaken in the lab turning shaker and gushing is blended consummately in an adequate time for the adsorption to happen. The blend is permitted to settle and the arrangement is separated through channel paper. Physiochemical examination and substantial metal grouping of the sifted arrangement is find through and the readings are noted down.

2.6VARIETY IN OPTIMUM CONTACT TIME: The known measure of the gushing from the business is brought down in the recepticle .Adsorbent is added to the emanating. The ideal contact time is fluctuated by keeping the dirt fixation and pH steady.Then the arrangement is blended altogether in the revolving shaker in a particular chance to arrive at harmony adsorption process happened.The blend is permitted to settle down and the arrangement is separated. Heavy metal focus and physiochemical examination of the sifted arrangement is find through and the readings are noted.

2.7FORMULAE USED FOR THE CALCULATIONS: Adsorption capacity, Where Po= Initial concentration of heavy metals (mg/l) đ?&#x2018;&#x192;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;= Final concentration heavy metals (mg/l) đ?&#x2018;&#x17E;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;= Adsorption capacity = Mass of the adsorbent (g) = Volume of waste water used (ml) 3. Results and Discussions 3.1. Wastewater Characteristics Characterization of effluent is carried to few parameters, following standard IS code methods Table 1 shows effluent characteristics.

SL.NO 1 2

Š 2020, IRJET

|

PARAMETER

VALUES

pH at 25Âş C TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS(TDS)(mg/L) Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

8.9 958 |

Page 2385

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

3

DISSOLVEDOXYGEN(DO)(% of saturation)

19.0

4

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND(COD)(mg/L)

227

5

BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND(BOD)(mg/L)

60

6

TURBIDITY (Nephelometric turbidity unit)

23.4

7

C0NDUCTIVITY(µS/cm at 25ºC)

1914

3.2 EFFECT OF pH VARIATION The pH of arrangement is key factor that controls the adsorption of the metal. Along these lines, it persuade the pH on the adsorption procedure was researched in the pH run between1.0 to 5.5 utilizing the mud of sum 5gm.

At the point when the corrosiveness of the medium declines from pH extend 1.5 to 3.0 the expulsion rate increments and with the expansion in the pH arrangement evacuation rate gets consistent. Muds has the negative surface charged particles in the courses of action as the pH changes, surface charge moreover changes and the adsorption of the charged particles get affected. It is accepted that at low pH levels, when there is surplus proportion of H3O+ particles in course of action, there is a test that exists between the positively charged hydrogen particles and the metal particles for the conceivable adsorption areas on the antagonistically charged mud surface. Right when the Ph assembles then H3O+ and OHparticles ends up being for all intents and purposes comparable so more decidedly charged metal particles in the course of action are adsorbed on the negative mud surface and along these lines the clearing percentage(%) of the metal particles increases. As the pH continues expanding there is a precipitation of metal hydroxides which prompts the diminishing in metal particles focus adsorbed on the earth surface.So it can infer that from pH 3 to 7 then to 9 there is no impact on the adsorption procedure.

3.3EFFECT OF ADSORBENT CONCENTRATION VARIATION: The proportion of soil adsorbent changes from 1.0gm to 5.5gm with the hour of 180 min. The % adsorption increases effectively with the consistent augmentations in the proportion of mud adsorbent. Openness of the extension in number of exchange of the areas extended. Along these lines, this is the run of the mill assessment when the dynamic surface locale is extended. Exactly when the proportion of qe of the adsorbent reductions at agreement then the proportion of the mud adsorbent will increases. Without a doubt, even the amount of adsorption site per unit mass of adsorbent should remain consistent, and it is liberated from irrefutably the adsorbent mass, extending in the adsorbent total in an acknowledged volume reduce the amount of reachable regions are effective surface region is likely going to be decrease.

3.4 EFFECT OF OPTIMUM CONTACT TIME VARIATION: The time-subordinate lead of the mind-boggling metals was evaluated by varying the concordance time in the range between 30–240 min. The pH is kept up 7 and the proportion of mud included was 5 gm. Result shows that the parity is reached quickly (~30 min) and it is confirm that, the adsorption goals are especially showed up. In addition, obviously with the extension in time from 30 to 60 min the aggregate adsorbed a bit increase © 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2386

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

followed by the consistent adsorption upon additional augmentation in the time. In like way, the shaking time was set at 60 min for the remaining of the bundle tests to ensure about that adsorption amicability has achieved in all of the case.

3.5. EFFECT OF pH VARIATION: 1. IRON -TABLE: REPRESENTATION OF ADSORPTION BY VARYING THE pH Sl. Initial conc. no (ppm)

Effluent volume

Adsorbent

Time

(g)

(min)

5

180

1.0

2005.52

85.21

577.72

pH

Final conc. (ppm)

% of Removal

qe

1

13560

(ml) 250

2

13560

250

5

180

1.5

1921.45

85.83

581.92

3

13560

250

5

180

2.0

1638.05

87.92

596.09

4

13560

250

5

180

2.5

1521.43

88.78

601.92

5

13560

250

5

180

3.0

1327.52

90.21

611.62

6

13560

250

5

180

3.5

1312.60

90.32

612.37

7

13560

250

5

180

4.0

1312.60

90.32

612.37

8

13560

250

5

180

4.5

1311.25

90.33

612.43

9

13560

250

5

180

5.0

1309.89

90.34

612.50

10

13560

250

5

180

5.5

1308.54

90.35

612.57

FIG : GRAPH BETWEEN pH AND % OF REMOVAL OF IRON METAL

© 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2387

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

2. ZINC -TABLE : REPRESENTATION OF ADSORPTION BY VARYING THE pH Sl. no

Effluent

Initial conc.

volume

(ppm)

Adsorbent

Time

pH

Final conc.

% of Removal

qe

(g)

(min)

5

180

1.0

1813.22

82.31

421.83

(ppm)

1

10250

(ml) 250

2

10250

250

5

180

1.5

1752.75

82.90

424.86

3

10250

250

5

180

2.0

1760.95

82.82

424.45

4

10250

250

5

180

2.5

1696.37

83.45

427.68

5

10250

250

5

180

3.0

1549.8

84.88

435.01

6

10250

250

5

180

3.5

1513.92

85.23

436.80

7

10250

250

5

180

4.0

1512.9

85.24

436.85

8

10250

250

5

180

4.5

1512.9

85.24

436.85

9

10250

250

5

180

5.0

1506.75

85.30

437.16

10

10250

250

5

180

5.5

1506.75

85.30

437.16

© 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2388

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

3.6 EFFECT OF ADSORBENT CONCENTRATION VARIATION: 1. IRON -TABLE: REPRESENTATION OF ADSORPTION BY VARYING THE ADSORBENT CONCENTRATION: Sl. no

Effluent

Initial conc.

volume

(ppm)

Adsorbent

Time

(g)

(min)

pH

Final conc. (ppm)

% of Removal

qe

(ml)

1

13560

250

1.0

180

7

2156.04

84.10

2850.99

2

13560

250

1.5

180

7

2101.80

84.50

1909.77

3

13560

250

2.0

180

7

1911.96

85.90

1531.00

4

13560

250

2.5

180

7

1800.76

86.72

1175.92

5

13560

250

3.0

180

7

1638.04

87.92

993.49

6

13560

250

3.5

180

7

1366.84

89.82

870.94

7

13560

250

4.0

180

7

1339.72

90.12

763.76

8

13560

250

4.5

180

7

1338.37

90.13

678.97

9

13560

250

5.0

180

7

1337.01

90.14

611.14

10

13560

250

5.5

180

7

1335.66

90.15

555.65

FIG : GRAPH BETWEEN ADSORBENT AND % OF REMOVAL OF IRON

© 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2389

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

.ZINC -TABLE: REPRESENTATION OF ADSORPTION BY VARYING THE ADSORBENT CONCENTRATION: Sl. no

Initial

Effluent

Adsorbent

Time (min)

pH

Final conc.

conc.

volume

(g)

1

(ppm) 10250

(ml) 250

1.0

180

7

1648.2

83.92

2150.45

2

10250

250

1.5

180

7

1691.25

83.50

1426.45

3

10250

250

2.0

180

7

1642.05

83.98

1075.99

4

10250

250

2.5

180

7

1616.42

84.23

863.35

5

10250

250

3.0

180

7

1593.87

84.45

721.34

6

10250

250

3.5

180

7

1588.75

84.50

618.66

7

10250

250

4.0

180

7

1525.2

85.12

545.3

8

10250

250

4.5

180

7

1527.25

85.10

484.59

9

10250

250

5.0

180

7

1522.12

85.15

436.39

10

10250

250

5.5

180

7

1517.00

85.20

396.95

(ppm)

% of Removal

qe

FIG : GRAPH BETWEEN ADSORBENT AND % OF REMOVAL OF ZINC

© 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2390

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

3.7EFFECT OF OPTIMUM CONTACT TIME VARIATION: 1. IRON -TABLE : REPRESENTATION OF ADSORPTION BY VARYING THE OPTIMUM CONTACT TIME: Sl. no

Adsorbent

Time

(g)

(min)

Initial conc.

Effluent volume

pH

(ppm)

(ml)

1

13560

250

5

30

7

1924.17

85.81

581.79

2

13560

250

5

60

7

1909.24

85.92

582.53

3

13560

250

5

90

7

1902.46

85.97

582.87

4

13560

250

5

120

7

1860.43

86.28

584.97

5

13560

250

5

150

7

1529.56

88.72

601.52

6

13560

250

5

180

7

1342.44

90.10

610.87

7

13560

250

5

210

7

1328.88

90.20

611.55

8

13560

250

5

240

7

1315.32

90.30

612.23

Final conc. (ppm)

% of Removal

qe

95 90 85 80 75 70 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

TIME(min) FIG : GRAPH BETWEEN TIME AND % OF REMOVAL OF IRON METAL

© 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2391

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

2. ZINC -TABLE : REPRESENTATION OF ADSORPTION BY VARYING THE OPTIMUM CONTACT TIME: Sl. no

Initial conc.

Effluent

Adsorbent

Time

volume

(g)

(min)

(ppm)

5

30

7

pH

Final conc.

% of Removal

qe

1823.47

82.21

421.32

(ppm)

1

10250

(ml) 250

2

10250

250

5

60

7

1812.2

82.32

421.89

3

10250

250

5

90

7

1648.2

83.92

430.09

4

10250

250

5

120

7

1593.87

84.45

432.80

5

10250

250

5

150

7

1476.00

85.60

438.7

6

10250

250

5

180

7

1463.7

85.72

439.31

7

10250

250

5

210

7

1462.67

85.73

439.36

8

10250

250

5

140

7

1460.62

85.75

439.46

FIG : GRAPH BETWEEN TIME AND % OF REMOVAL OF ZINC METAL 4. Conclusions 1.This work shows that substantial metals like iron and zinc is adsorbed and expelled from the steel business gushing utilizing the least expensive adsorbent i.e., bentonite mud material.

2. Bentonite Clay material from Davangere area is grounded, sieved and dried to bring the dirt open for adsorption reason. © 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2392

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

3. When there is increment in the pH from 1.5 to 3.0 there is increment in the evacuation rate however when pH arrives at 3.0 then expulsion productivity gets consistent.

4. Increment in the heaviness of the mud adsorbent then there is increment the evacuation rate.

5. Increment in the ideal contact time between emanating arrangement and the adsorbent, builds the expulsion rate.

6. Iron has more expulsion rate than the zinc (Fe>Zn) 7. Bunch technique is appropriate for the enterprises than the segment strategy.

5. References [1] Ababu T. Tiruneh1, Tesfamariam Y. Debessai, Gabriel C. Bwembya, Stanley J, Nkambule(2018) “Combined Clay Adsorption-Coagulation Process for the Removal of Some Heavy Metals from Water and Wastewater”, American journal of environmental engineering, Vol. 8, pp 25 – 35.

[2] Abbas Esmaeili,Mohammad Mobini ,Hadi Eslami(2019) “Removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage by native natural clay minerals, batch and continuous studies” Vol. 9, pp. 97.

[3] Alleoni, L.R.F., Silveira, M.L.A., Guilherme, L.R.G., Scientia Agricola “ Removal of heavy metals from modified bentonite clay” 30 (4), 793–806 (2003).

[4] Atichat Wongkoblap, Yuvarat Ngernyen, Supattra Budsaereechai and Atiwat Charoenbood (2016)“Heavy Metal Removal from Aqueous Solution by using Bentonite Clay and Activated Carbon” , Vol . 16, issue 5, pp. 2943, 2016.

[5] B. Benguella, and A. Yacouta Nour, “Adsorption of Bezanyl Red and Nylomine Green from aqueous solutions by natural and acid-activated bentonite,” Desalination, vol. 235, pp. 276-292, 2009.

[6] E.N. El Qada, S.J. Allen, and G.M. Walker, “Adsorption of basic dyes from equilibrium solution onto activated carbons,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 135, pp. 174-184, 2008.

[7] Heba H. El-Maghrabi ,Sara Mikhail(2014)“Removal of Heavy Metals via Adsorption using Natural Clay Material”, Vol.4, No.19, 2014.

[8] Joziane Gimenes Meneguin, Gianini Regina Luz, Indianara Conceição Ostroski, Maria Angélica Simões Dornellas de Barros, Marcelino Luiz Gimenes(2018) “Removal of Heavy Metals in K-Bentonite Clay” , Vol 206, pp. 270–278.

[9] J. Ming Qin, W. Qing Ping, J. Xiao Ying, and C. Zu Liang, “Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution using modified and unmodified kaolinite clay,” J. of Hazardous Materials, vol. 170, pp. 332-339, 2009.

[10] J. Vassilis, A. Marinos, Stylianou, Despoina, Gkantzou, D. Maria, and Loizidou, “Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions by using clinoptilolite and bentonite as adsorbents,” Desalination, vol. 210, pp. 248-256, 2006.

[11] L. Li, P.A. Quinlivan, and R.U. Knappe, “Effects of activated carbon surface chemistry and pore structure on the adsorption of organic contaminats from aqueous solution,” Carbon, vol. 40, pp. 2085-2100, 2002. © 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2393

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 07 Issue: 08 | Aug 2020

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

[12] M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, E. Senturk, and M. Ince, “Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from apricot stone,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 96, pp. 1518-1521, 2005.

[13] M. Rachakomkij, S. Ruangchuay, and S. Teachakulwiroj, “Removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solution using bagasse fly ash,” Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., vol. 26, pp. 13-24, 2004.

[14] M. Tangsathitkulchai, C. Tangsathitkulchai, K. Wongsooksin, and S. Chuyingsakuntip, “Removal of Residual Aluminium-Dye Complex and Aluminium Ion from Spent Natural-Dye Solution Using Activated Carbons,” Engineering Journal, vol. 16, issue 5, pp. 29-43, 2012.

© 2020, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 2394