Beware SAFe (the Scaled Agile Framework for Enterprise), an Unholy Incarnation of Darkness
In the event that you'd preferably SAFe represent itself with no issue you can utilize the connection above. There's many pages of documentation, long periods of recordings, 15 diverse instructional classes, and that's only the tip of the iceberg. On the off chance that that seems like somewhat a lot, I'll put forth a valiant effort to give some clarification of how SAFe functions as I experience each point. At the most elevated level, called the "Portfolio", SAFe advocates financing inconclusive "Worth Streams" — which normally speak to an item, product offering, or client type. In any case, the Lean Portfolio Management group (LPM) that controls financing (likely similar individuals already liable for cascade style venture spending plans), are given sole position to affirm which Portfolio Epics (enormous activities) move into each stream. Legends are not clarifications about an issue that should be tackled. They are pre-framed thoughts regarding how best to take care of those issues. Immediately we can see indications of the old-school attitude of survey groups as a "conveyance" work rather than a key one. The significant level masterminds think of thoughts, and the low level practitioners execute on those thoughts. Overlooked is the likelihood that those nearest to the work may be best prepared to settle on choices about it. Getting away from this misinformed attitude is a center objective of Agile Working reasoning that SAFe neglects to remotely achieve. A comparable issue springs up again when we take a gander at a somewhat lower level.