Dr. Steven Hotze Recognized as "Man of the Year" by Houston Business Connections Newspaper

Jared Woodfill, Aubrey R Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper, Dr Steven Hotze, M D

Martinez

Study Uncovers Official Vote Totals in Two of the 79 Down-Ballot Countywide Races in Harris County, Texas Could Be Manipulated

SAFEGUARDING LIBERT Y... PATRIOTS

AUBREY R TAYLOR REPORTS©

I’m sure by now you’ve heard that the recently released Audit of the 2020 Presidential Election results in Harris County, Texas found some various serious problem In fact, there’s still a discrepancy of more than 6,000 or so, “ABSENTEE MAIL BALLOTS” that has yet to be resolved And on top of that, the Forensic Audit Division (FAD) of the Secretary of State, found that there are possibly 11,000 potential non-citizens registered to vote, in Har-

ris County, Texas

In my opinion, Harris County, Texas is out of control, and something must be done about dirty local government officials, namely the Harris County Elections Administrate (Clifford Tatum) providing three different versions of their reconciliation report, and EA Office’s stonewalling of the (FAD) investigators

Now, according the recently released audit of the 2020 Presidential Election, “FAD was not given the opportunity to speak with pertinent staff until October 2022 when the new administration finally provided access to address the issues with the Tally Audit Log ”

ABOUT THE AUDIT

According to the Forensic Audit Division, at the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, this audit was conducted to “ensure that all Texas voters can have confidence in the elections systems in our state,” the

Texas Secretary of State ordered a full forensic audit of the 2020 General Election in Collin, Dallas, Harris, and Tarrant counties Two of the counties – Tarrant and Collin –represent the largest Republican-controlled-county governments in the State of Texas, while the remaining two – Harris and Dallas – represent the largest Democratic-controlled-county governments in the State This approach ensures that the State of Texas can provide an honest, transparent assessment of county election offices overseen by both political parties

Harris County advised the (FAD) investigators, “that they did not believe they had a continuity of operations or emergency response plan in 2020 and would check on whether any of these plans existed,” according to the audit That being said, the audit outlines that, Harris County indicated the county had protections in place against cybersecurity threats.” How-

ever, from reading the audit, I’ve learned that Harris County never provided this information to the auditors ”

After the fact, it appears that, Harris County has now contracted with a vendor to create a security plan and is in the process of exploring the options available to them when it comes creating a more robust security plan the audit details

In at least 14 polling locations, mobile ballot boxes (MBBs) containing 184,999 cast vote records included in the tally did not have proper chain of custody

Harris County was not able to provide documentation for the creation of 17 MBBs (mob8le ballot boxes) accounting for 124,630 cast vote records

one percent or more between the number of voters that checked in to the number of votes cast at that location,” requested at the outset of the audit. This is basic reconciliation that should have been easily produced

FAD was not given the opportunity to speak with pertinent staff until October 2022 when the new administration provided access to address the issues with the Tally Audit Log

THE SPECIFIC (FAD)

FINDINGS

IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FOR HARRIS COUNT Y, TEX AS ARE VERY TROUBLING

According to the audit, “Harris County had very serious issues in the handling of electronic media These issues were so severe that FAD notified Harris County of it’s preliminary findings by letter prior to the start of the 2022 General Election ” Harris County findings:

The electronic pollbook records from at least 26 Early Voting locations and 8 Election Day polling locations did not match the Tally Audit Log for those locations

Harris County did not have an inventory of their warehoused records for the 2020 General Election FAD counted 534 boxes but cannot confirm this comprises all records At times, FAD observed the label used on the outside of the boxes inaccurately described the contents

Harris County was the only county that did not provide a “list of Early Voting or Election Day polling locations that had a discrepancy of

In Harris County, each JBC at a polling location had uniquely colored tapes Instead of having to match tapes by serial number, tapes could be matched by color

Harris County’s Election Day reconciliation packets included copies of forms from the polling location, tapes from the controllers, and a reconciliation cover 13 pages For early voting, Harris County’s reconciliation envelopes included information regarding starting and end of day counts from each JBC

SAFEGUARDING LIBERT Y...

THE MYSTERIOUS ACT OF MOVING BALLOT BOXES UNCOVERED BY (CRTXNEWS) AND HOUSTON BUSINESS CONNECTIONS NEWSPAPER ON OCTOBER 31, 2022

Voting machines and “VOTED BALLOTS” were being moved around in a mysterious manner in Harris County, Texas during the “EARLY VOTING PERIOD” of the 2022 Midterm Election in ways, and at times, that makes absolutely no sense

In fact, for all we know, “THE VOTING MACHINES” that were being moved from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center, located at 3810 W Fuqua Street, in Houston, Texas 77045, on Monday, October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’clock hour could have been loaded with illegally cast votes

Why did Grace Taylor, the “ELECTION JUDGE” at the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center, lie about the number of “VOTING MACHINES” that were being removed

from this popular “PREDOMINANTLY AFRICAN AMERICAN” voting location when she was approached by Aubrey R Taylor, in his capacity as publisher/investigative reporter for Houston Business Connections Newspaper, and Dr Steven F Hotze, in his capacity as publisher/investigative reporter for (CRTXNEWS) Conservative Republicans of Texas News, who also happens to be the founder of the Liberty Center For God & Country?

• What would make Grace Taylor, the “ELECTION JUDGE” at the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center, state that only (3) three “VOTING MACHINES” had broken down and had to be removed, when there were actually (6) six “VOTING MACHINES” on the cart that was pulled out of the “PREDOMINANTLY AFRICAN AMERICAN” voting location and loaded into a pickup truck?

Why didn’t Grace Taylor, the “ELECTION JUDGE” tell Dr Hotze,

and Aubrey R Taylor about the “VOTING MACHINES” that were ‘allegedly’ removed from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center, a few hours prior to their arrival at the “PREDOMINATELY AFRICAN AMERICAN” voting location on the morning of Monday, October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’Clock hour?

Why did the African American male who was moving the “VOTING MACHINES” tell Aubrey R. Taylor that he didn’t know why he was moving the “VOTING MACHINES” from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center, located at 3810 W Fuqua Street, in Houston, Texas 77045, on Monday, October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’clock hour?

Where is the “CHAIN OF CUSTODY LOG” for the “VOTING MACHINES” that were removed from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center located at 3810 W Fuqua Street,

“FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT.”

in Houston, Texas 77045, on Monday, October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’clock hour?

Does the “CHAIN OF CUSTODY LOG” for the “VOTING MACHINES” that were removed from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center located at 3810 W Fuqua Street, in Houston, Texas 77045, on Monday, October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’clock hour show tracking for the “VOTING MACHINES” from the time they left the elections office until the time they were returned to the elections office?

Is the signature of the African American male who removed the “VOTING MACHINES” from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center located at 3810 W. Fuqua Street, in

Houston, Texas 77045, on Monday, October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’clock hour on the “CHAIN OF CUSTODY LOG” showing that this voting equipment changed hands?

CHAIN OF CUSTODY LOG

In case you don’t know, “The purpose of this form is to track the custody and location of voting equipment, supplies and/or ballots from the time the voting equipment, supplies, and/or ballots leave the elections office until returned to the elections office A signature is required whenever the equipment, supplies and/or ballots change hands or location By signing the Chain of Custody Form the signer is certifying when he or she took custody of the voting equipment, supplies, and/or ballots and delivered it to a particular location The person receiving cus-

tody of the equipment must examine the voting equipment, supplies, and/or ballots to ensure that all seals are in place and that all appears to be intact and in sufficient working order, as can best be determined by a visual inspection

Where is the chain of custody log for the “VOTING MACHINES” that were removed from the Hiram Clarke Multi-Service Center on October 31, 2022, during the 10 O’Clock hour in this pickup truck?

DR. STEVEN HOTZE, M.D.

SAFEGUARDING LIBERTY: Dr Steven Hotze, MD, greeting a male and female member of the ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW at the Kashmere Multi-Service Center location on Monday, October 31, 2022, heading into the final week of early voting in Harris County

Voter irregularities in Harris County are jeopardizing public trust in elections and needs to be fixed!

Houston, TX – Senator Paul Bettencourt (R-Houston) refiled Senate Bill 220 recently in response to the serious improprieties reported to Texas' Secretary of State (SOS) concerning Harris County's election administration during the November 8th election SB 220 will allow the SOS to appoint Election Marshals from the Department of Public Safety who will be able to be dispatched to investigate potential voting violations as they occur during the November Uniform elections and primaries

"What happened in the November 8th election in Harris County is absolutely abominable and can NEVER

happen again! Which is why I will continue to champion voter integrity bills like Senate Bill 220 Citizens should have absolute confidence in their elections, they should be able to show up to a polling location and cast their ballot without being undermined by incompetent government because that's what democracy's all about but that's what's being denied here!" Senator Bettencourt exclaimed

S e n a t e B i l l 2 2 0 w i l l a l s o p r o v i d e e m e r g e n c y j u d g e s t o b e a b l e t o h e a r c a s e s w i t h i n t h r e e h o u r s o f r ep o r t i n g d u r i n g e a r l y v o t i n g a n d w i t h i n o n e h o u r d u r i n g e l e c t i o n d a y T h e s e j u d g e s w o u l d b e a p p o i n t e d b y t h e e l e v e n r e g i o n a l a d m i n i s t r at i v e l a w j u d g e s a c r o s s t h e s t a t e . R e p r e s e n t a t i v e Va l o r e e S w a n s o n ( R - H a r r i s C o u n t y ) f i l e d t h e H o u s e c o m p a n i o n b i l l i n t h e Te x a s H o u s e o f R e p r e s e n t a t i v e s B i l l 5 4 9

improprieties

“ I s t a n d w i t h S e n a t o r B e t t e nc o u r t i n f i g h t i n g t h e r a m p a n t f r a u d o f f a i l i n g e l e c t i o n s o f f i c i a l s i n H a rr i s C o u n t y. I a m p r o u d t o h a v e f i l e d H B 5 4 9 a s t h e H o u s e v e r s i o n o f S e n a t o r B e t t e n c o u r t ’ s b i l l , w h i c h g i v e s t h e S e c r e t a r y o f S t a t e t h e a u t h o r i t y t o s e n d t h e Te x a s R a n g e r s t o s t o p e l e c t i o n c h e a t i n g a s i t h a p p e n s a n d i nv e s t i g a t e a c t i v e e l e c t i o n f r a u d W e w i l l p r o t e c t e l e c t i o n i n t e g r i t y i n Te x a s ! ” s t a t e d R e p r e s e n t a t i v e S w a n s o n

Unfortunately, election irregularities in Harris County are not a new phenomenon SB 220 was previously filed as SB 1589 during the 87th Legislative Session and was passed out of the Senate Committee on State Affairs Senator Bettencourt expects to file additional voter integrity legislation ahead of the 88th Legislative Session

By: Bettencourt

S B No 220

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the enforcement of laws relating to elections

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISL ATURE OF THE STATE OF TEX AS:

SECTION 1. Section 31 005, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec 31 005 ENFORCEMENT; PROTECTION OF VOTING RIGHTS. (a) The secretary of state may take appropriate action to protect against violations of this code and to protect the voting rights of the citizens of this state from abuse by the authorities administering the state's electoral processes

(b) If the secretary determines that a person performing official functions in the administration of any part of the electoral processes is exercising the powers vested in that person in a manner that impedes the free exercise of a citizen's voting rights or otherwise violates a provision of this code, the secretary may order the person to correct the of-

fending conduct If the person fails to comply, the secretary may seek enforcement of the order by a temporary restraining order or a writ of injunction or mandamus obtained through the attorney general

SECTION 2 The heading to Chapter 34, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

CHAPTER 34. STATE INSPECTORS AND ELECTION MARSHALS

SECTION 3 Chapter 34, Election Code, is amended by adding Sections 34 006 and 34 007 to read as follows:

Sec 34 006 ELECTION

(c) The state election marshal shall designate an election marshal in each Department of Public Safety region as the chief election marshal for the region The chief election marshal for a region shall assign election marshals to each alleged violation of this code occurring in the region as described by Section 34 007

(d) To be qualified as a state election marshal or an election marshal, a person must:

(1) be licensed as a peace officer by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement;

(2) be commissioned by the Department of Public Safety; and

MARSHALS

(a)

The secretary of state shall appoint a state election marshal The state election marshal reports to the secretary of state

(b) The state election marshal shall appoint election marshals for each Department of Public Safety region such that there is one election marshal for each 1,000,000 people who reside in the region Appointments must be made not later than the 60th day before the date early voting is scheduled to begin in an election held on a uniform election date in November or a primary election

An appointment made under this section is in effect for 90 days, and may be extended by the state election marshal if the election marshal is conducting an investigation

(3) have received training in election law from the secretary of state

(e) An election marshal has the powers and duties of a state inspector under this chapter and other powers and duties as assigned by law

(f) The name, county of residence, and contact information for the purpose of official business of each election marshal and the state election marshal are public information

88TH LEGISL ATIVE SESSION

(1) "Chief election marshal" means the election marshal appointed by the secretary of state for a Department of Public Safety region

(2) "Election marshal" means an election marshal appointed under Section 34 006

(3) "State inspector" means a state inspector appointed under this chapter

(b) A state inspector or election marshal shall promptly investigate an alleged violation of this code that is:

(1) supported by an affidavit or unsworn declaration; and

(2) submitted to the state inspector or chief election marshal, and if submitted to the chief election marshal, assigned to the election marshal

(c) If an election marshal investigates an alleged violation of this code and finds probable cause exists that a violation of this code is occurring or is likely to occur, the election marshal:

(1) shall exercise all lawful means to prevent the violation from continuing or occurring;

(2) may seek such orders, processes, or warrants from a court that the election marshal finds necessary to prevent the violation from continuing or occurring; and

(3) may also file appropriate criminal charges

(d) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to affect the right of a candidate or political party to file a civil action under other law

SECTION 4 Section 273 001(a), Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

(a) If two or more registered voters of the territory covered by an election or an election marshal assigned to the Department of Public Safety region that includes the territory covered by an election presents present affidavits alleging criminal conduct in connection with the election to the county or district attorney having jurisdiction in that territory, the county or district attorney shall investigate the allegations If the election covers territory in more than one county, the voters may present the affidavits to the attorney general, and the attorney general shall investigate the allegations

SECTION 5 The heading to Section 273 003, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec 273 003 IMPOUNDING ELECTION RECORDS AND EQUIPMENT

SECTION 6. Section 273 003(a), Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

(a) In the investigation of an election, a county or district attorney, or the attorney general, the secretary of state, or an election marshal may have impounded for the investigation the election returns, voted ballots, signature roster, and other election records or equipment

SECTION 7 The heading of Subchapter E, Chapter 273, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER E. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND EMERGENCY REVIEW INJUNCTION

SECTION 8. Section 273 081, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec 273 081 INJUNCTION (a) A person, including a candidate, a political party, or a state, county, or precinct chair of a political party, who is being harmed or is in danger of being harmed by a violation or threatened violation of this code is entitled to appropriate injunctive relief to prevent the violation from continuing or occurring and may bring an action to obtain injunctive relief to prevent the violation from continuing or occurring

(b) In connection with an action for injunctive relief filed under Subsection (a), a court may issue subpoenas of persons or property and order the inspection or impoundment of election records or equipment

SECTION 9. Subchapter E, Chapter 273, Election Code, is amended by adding Sections 273 082 and 273 083 to read as follows:

Sec. 273.082. DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE (a) The judge of a district or county court with jurisdiction over any geographic area served by an election official who is a party in a proceeding for injunctive relief under this subchapter is disqualified to preside over the proceeding, unless the election official serves statewide

(b) If a petition is filed in a proceeding in which a judge may be disqualified under Subsection (a), the clerk of the court shall promptly call the filing to the attention of the judge If the judge determines that the judge is disqualified under Subsection (a), the judge shall promptly request the presiding judge of the administrative judicial region to assign an alternate judge to preside over the proceeding

(c) A judge who resides in the geographic area served by the election official who is a party under Subsection (a) is not eligible for assignment as an alternate judge for the proceeding

(d) In a proceeding in which a judge is disqualified under Subsection (a), until an alternate judge is assigned to preside over the proceeding, the presiding judge of the

administrative judicial region may take any action in the proceeding otherwise authorized by law, including the issuance of temporary relief

Sec. 273.083. EMERGENCY REVIEW OF ELECTION ACTIVITY (a) Not later than the 60th day before the date of a regular or special election, the presiding judge of each administrative judicial region shall appoint a sufficient number of visiting judges to serve as emergency election review judges to preside in actions under this section, in accordance with Chapter 74, Government Code

(b) A judge appointed to serve as an emergency election review judge shall receive training as specified by the secretary of state at least once a year

(c) An action filed by a candidate in an election or a political party or state, county, or precinct chair of a political party that has a candidate in an election that alleges a violation of this code in that election and requests emergency injunctive relief to prevent the alleged violation from continuing or occurring shall be assigned to an emergency election review judge An action under this section arising in the district or county in which the court served by an active judge appointed as an emergency election review judge has jurisdiction may not be assigned to that judge

(d) A request for hearing in an action heard by an emergency election review judge shall be delivered to the assigned judge who shall promptly conduct a hearing, by electronic means or otherwise, to begin no later than:

(1) three hours after the judge receives a written hearing request filed not earlier than the 45th day before the date of the election and not later than the last day of in-person early voting; or

(2) one hour after the judge receives a written hearing request filed not earlier than the last day of in-person early voting and not later than the final canvass of an election

(e) A hearing conducted by an emergency election review judge shall be recorded or transcribed and is subject to appellate review

SECTION 10 This Act takes effect September 1, 2023

THE “GOP” WON TEXAS AGAIN...

“Back on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in the Midterm Election, the people of Texas once again entrusted governance of the Lone Star State to the “GOP” Greater Opportunity Party That being said, Texas will continue to be the strongest Republican state in the nation Did you know that, no Democrat has won a statewide seat (outright) in the state of Texas since the 1994 Gubernatorial Election? Yes, you heard me right!”

— AUBREY R. TAYLOR

“THE GREATER OPPORTUNIT Y PART Y.”

Wesley P Hunt won the 38th Congressional District of Texas back on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in the Lone Star State

Morgan Luttrell won the 8th Congressional District of Texas back on Tuesday, November 8, 2022

Jessica N Padilla won the race for County Criminal Court at Law No 14, in Harris County

Gov Greg Abbott won his bid for reelection back on November 8, 2022.

Attorney General Ken Paxton won his bid for reelection back on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in the Lone Star State over his Democratic challenger.

Honorable Judge Robert Johnson

JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS FOR ALL

“EVERYONE DESERVES A FAIR TRIAL.” HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

“JUDGE DASEAN JONES IS A GAME-CHANGER.”

As a U S Army decorated combat veteran and current member of the Army Reserves, Judge Jones has truly dedicated his life to public service Judge Jones is running for re-election to continue demonstrate that justice at its best arises from unbought, unbossed, bold citizens who respect the rule of law as it is written In criminal cases, too often the people who make life decisions for so many of Harris County's citizens do not share similar life experiences of those they punish daily Living and working throughout the world from childhood onward, Judge Jones learned about and engaged in various cultures and ideologies These are the same things that make Harris County great After witnessing first-hand how too many judges were closed-minded and prejudiced towards some defendants and attorneys, but afforded others with whom they were socially or financially in line with better opportunities and

common courtesies, as well as "the benefit of the doubt," Judge Jones ran for office and won in November of 2018; making him the first minority to preside over the 180th Criminal District Court since its inception Financial status, connections, race, clothing and other variables should not come into play in regards to the ad-

ministration of justice

Judge Jones was raised by his dad, a retired U S Army Staff Sergeant and his mother, who passed away on Valentine's Day a few weeks after his return from his second tour in Iraq Judge Jones has three siblings Two of which are disabled veterans While in elementary school, Judge Jones visited Auschwitz, Anne Frank's house, and other key historical examples of social injustice and abuse of power These experiences have helped mold him into the person he is today

After graduating from the storied Tuskegee University, Judge Jones commissioned as an Army Field Artillery Officer, where he led soldiers from all walks of life and held the highest standards as military combat arms officer Judge Jones, his wife and three children reside in Houston, where his children attend public school

“Putting People Over Politics in Texas.”

“A FRESH APPROACH.”

"Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future" -- Oscar Wilde

Explore methods to ensure nonviolent offenders are held accountable for their criminal conduct outside of the prison system while supporting and investigating programs that help rehabilitate offenders

Promote access to mental health services for those offenders whose criminal conduct is connected to mental health issues Encouraging diagnose and plans to aid those with such issues in effort to reduce new law violations

Impact the community by having an increased presence in spaces where criminal court judges are not normally found (e.g. schools, parks, community gatherings, et cetera)

Follow the law and uphold the United States Constitution, Texas Constitution, and all current laws in effort to treat everyone with dignity and respect A judge must remove himself from personal biases and reach conclusions that are the sum of the applicable law

THE NUMBERS DON’T ADD UP...

COLLEEN M. VERA, A MEMBER OF THE HARRIS COUNTY BALLOT BOARD SAYS, “THE NUMBERS DON’T ADD UP.”

BY COLLEEN M VERA

I keep getting calls asking if it is true that the “numbers” for the Nov 8, 2022 election being reported by the Harris County Elections Administrator (EA) don’t add up It is very hard to explain over the phone, so I am posting some of the numbers to show that yes, it is true, some of the numbers in this election simply don’t add up

I have used the numbers posted online by the Harris County EA to explain some of the problems with the numbers he has reported I am giving you the link to each document posted by the Harris County EA so you can check the numbers out for yourself I have bolded in blue the numbers from the EA’s own reports I have bolded in red my mathematical calculations so you can see

what I found I urge you to go to the original documents and check the math for yourself

REGISTERED VOTERS

Let’s start with a very simple number the number of registered voters in Harris County for this election That should be easy Right?

Let’s compare that number as reported by the Harris County EA on various “official” documents:

11/10/2022 Preliminary Reconciliation Report (upper left) - 2,547,825

11/18/2022 Election Reconciliation Official Totals (upper left) - 2,549,262 11/19/2022 Official Results - Cumulative Results Report (upper right) - 2,543,162

The difference in the number of registered voters for this election as reported by the Harris County EA from 11/18/2022 to 11/19/2022 was - 6,100.

Who were those 6,100 registered voters and how did they disappear in that 24-hour period?

MAILED BALLOTS

Now let’s look at the ballot by mail numbers reported in the “Election Reconciliation - Official Totals ” Look at Box #6 in the bottom left-hand corner: Line “R’ gives the number of ballots sent to voters by mail Line “S” gives the number of voters who chose not to return their mailed ballot to be counted Line “T” gives the number of voters who surrendered their mailed ballot in order to vote in person If you subtract the ballots not returned and the ballots surrendered, you should have the number of mailed ballots returned for this election

If you subtract the Provisional ballots which were “rejected” and those which were “incomplete,” you should have the number of Provisional ballots “counted.” But you don’ t. Instead, you have the Harris County EA reporting that he counted 205 FEWER. So…if those Provisional ballots were not rejected, incomplete, or counted, where did those 205 ballots go?

See my equation below:

Box #6 (R) Mailed ballots sent to voters 80,995 Box #6 (S) Mailed ballots NOT retuned by voter - 19,486 Box #6 (T) Mailed ballots surrendered - 6,557

Box #6 Mailed ballots retuned this election 54,952

It’s just basic math No big deal until you look at Box #1 in the upper left-hand corner of the same “official” report Line “C” in this box gives the total number of “mail ballots voters ” That number should match the number of voters who returned a ballot by mail for this election But the numbers don’t match they aren’t even close

Box #1 (C) Mail ballot voters 64,259

Box #6 Mailed ballots retuned this election - 54,952

More mail ballots to count than reported mailed + 9,307

In other words the Harris County EA reported that there were 9,307 MORE MAILED BALLOTS TO COUNT in this election than they reported MAILED AND RETURNED BY VOTERS That is a serious discrepancy!

PROVISIONAL BALLOTS

Now take a look at the Provisional ballot numbers reported on the “Election Reconciliation Official Totals” report posted on 11/18/2022

Box #1 (D) Provisional ballots submitted - 6,302 Box #2 (G) Provisional ballots rejected - 1,764 Box #7 (U) Provisional Ballots deemed incomplete - 0

Provisional ballots to be counted 4,538

Box #3 (L) Provisional ballots counted - 4,333 Fewer Provisional ballots counted than available 205

But even more interesting in Harris County’s reporting of Provisional ballots in this election, is a comparison of the number of Provisional ballots reported on the first Reconciliation Report posted on 11/10/2022 to the final Election Reconciliation report posted in 11/18/2022.

Box #6 (O) 11/10/2022 Report

- Estimated provisional ballots 3,828 Box #1 (D) 11/18/2022 Report

- Provisional ballots submitted 6,302

Difference in number of Provisional ballots following election night +2,474

So after finishing counting the Election Night results, and compiling the Reconciliation Report on 11/10/2022, the Harris County EA reported having approximately 3,828 Provisional ballots to be processed By the time the final official results were posted eight days later, the Harris County EA had found approximately 2,474 additional Provisional ballots to add to his count That’s very interesting Where were those additional 2,474 Provisional ballots found?

Election Reconciliation

2022 Totals

CUMUL ATIVE RESULTS

- Official Results

But perhaps the most notable numbers which don’t add up in this election can be found by digging into the vote count “Official Results” which the Harris County Elections Administrator posted on 11/19/2022.

To fully understand this report, you must first understand what is in it First, in the upper right-hand corner is the number 1,107,390 That is the number of “cast vote records” counted, or you could say the number of voters who cast a ballot

Then the voters’ choices are given for each race The number of votes cast for each candidate in columns by the type of vote cast: Ballot by Mail, Early Voting In Person, Election Day In Person, Early Voting Provisional Ballot, and Election Day Provisional Ballot The far right-hand column gives the total votes cast for each candidate

Below the votes cast for each candidate is the number of “undervotes” or voters who chose not to vote in that race, followed by the number of “overvotes” or the voters who voted for too many candidates in that race Finally, the total number of “write-in” votes not included in the list of candidates In order to get the total number of votes cast in a particular race, you must add the votes cast for candidates to the undervotes, overvotes, and write ins

As an example, let’s look at the race for Governor of Texas on Page 5 of the Cumulative Results Report.

Additionally, if you go back to the 11/18/2022 “Election Reconciliation – Official Totals” report, you will find that the number of “Counted Ballots” in Box #3, match up perfectly with each type of ballot cast

You can’t total every race and expect the total cast ballots to be the same because many races are Precinct or District races such as US Representative, State Senator, County Commissioner, School Boards, etc.

But the races every voter in Harris County gets to vote in, from District Judge, 55th Judicial District on Page 20 down to County Treasurer on Page 42, should all total to the same number of cast votes – 1,107,390.

If you start reviewing the total votes cast in the countywide races on page 20…everything looks good… that is…until you get to Page 26. That’s when the cast vote

records for Ballot by Mail start to show discrepancies.

n

f

Whose votes did NOT get counted??? ...Mine???... Maybe YOURS??? THE NUMBERS DON’T ADD UP... 61,237 692,748 349,045 1,778 2,555 1,107,363 1,107,390 = + + + + When this line of numbers is added together the total should be: 1,107,390 61,186 692,748 349,045 1,778 2,555 1,107,312 = + + + + When this line of numbers is added together the total should be: 1,107,390 61,049 692,748 349,045 1,778 2,555 1,107,175 = + + + + When this line of numbers is added together the total should be: 1,107,390 Page 26

Alan Vera and Colleen Vera, pictured with Deborah Kelting Fite, and James Buntrock hard at work for the Harris County Republican Party

THESE RACE TOTALS ALL ADD UP TO: 1,107,390

Please take a look at the results for races for Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Comptroller of Public Accounts, and Commissioner for the General Land Office. Now, please understand that, the “TABULATION COMPUTER” counts “UNDER VOTES” AND “OVER VOTES” as votes cast. So, even when voters skips over a race, or leaves it blank, the “TABULATION COMPUTER” still counts the blank as an “UNDERVOTE.” That being said, every countywide should have 1,107,390 ballots cast when you combine the totals in the Ballot by Mail Column, Early Voting Column, Election Day Column, (EV) Provisional Column, and (ED) Provisional Column. Call (281)788-3033, if you have questions.

Please take a look at the results for races for Harris County Judge, County Civil Court at Law No. 1, Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 2, Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 3, and Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 4. Now, please understand that, the “TABULATION COMPUTER” counts “UNDER VOTES” AND “OVER VOTES” as votes cast So, even when voters skips over a race, or leaves it blank, the “TABULATION COMPUTER” still counts the blank as an “UNDERVOTE.” That being said, every countywide should have 1,107,390 ballots cast when you combine the totals in the Ballot by Mail Column, Early Voting Column, Election Day Column, (EV) Provisional Column, and (ED) Provisional Column Call (281)788-3033 if you have questions about these numbers.

COURT AT L AW TOTALS

Please take a look at the results for these Harris County Criminal Court at Law races. Now, please understand that, the “TABULATION COMPUTER” counts “UNDER VOTES” AND “OVER VOTES” as votes cast So, even when voters skips over a race, or leaves it blank, the “TABULATION COMPUTER” still counts the blank as an “UNDERVOTE.” That being said, every countywide should have 1,107,390 ballots cast when you combine the totals in the Ballot by Mail Column, Early Voting Column, Election Day Column, (EV) Provisional Column, and (ED) Provisional Column Call (281)788-3033 if you have questions about these numbers.

GLORIA DIED IN 2010

For the record, Gloria Rideaux Chambers passed away back in 2010...more than 12 years ago.

QUESTION: How did Gloria Rideaux Chambers renew her voter registration from her grave? If you look at her voter registration certificate above, you will see that Gloria Rideau Chambers’s registration is valid from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023 How is this possible?

TOMMIE DIED IN 2016

For the record, Tommie Bookman passed away back in 2010...more than 6 years ago.

QUESTION: How did Tommie Bookman renew his voter registration from his grave? If you look at his voter registration certificate above, you will see that Tommie Bookman’s registration is valid from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023 How is this possible? How did his voter registration get renewed?

ELECTION FRAUD?

QUESTIONABLE OFFICIAL VOTING TOTALS HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN TWO OF THE DOWN-BALLOT JUDICIAL

BY THE HARRIS COUNTY

According to records provided by the Texas Secretary of State, the only Precinct Chair in PRECINCT #0039, is Elisa Cardell, who is a Democrat That being said, areas like PRECINCT #0039, all across Harris County, Texas are devoid of a “MUCH NEEDED” Republican Precinct Chairs, and that’s something that must be corrected prior to the 2024 Presidential Election, that is scheduled to take place on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, in the United States

For the record, Harris County voter PRECINCT #0039, produced a “VERY CONCERNING” voter return in two downballot judicial races, during the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, in Harris County, Texas

The two down-ballot judicial races in question were both won by fewer than 500 votes with more than 1 million votes cast, but neither is being contested as of yet And please note that these two down-ballot races represent the two smallest margins of victory on the entire Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election ballot, in Harris County, Texas

RACES

ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR

180TH DISTRICT COURT

In the race for District Judge, 180th Criminal District Court between Judge DaSean Jones (Democrat), who received 534,460 votes, for 50 02% of the vote, and his challenger Tami Pierce (Republican), who received 534,011 votes, for 49 98% of the vote, there’s something strange about the (536 to 1,536) vote total that has been reported by Clifford Tatum, the Harris County Elections Administrator

Is it a coincidence that Tami Pierce (Republican) received (536) votes and Judge DaSean Jones received (1,536) votes, in PRECINCT #0039, in the race for District Judge, 180th Criminal District Court, and the only other race to produce such a coincidental result the race for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No 3, between Leslie Johnson (Republican) who received (525) votes and Porscha Natasha Brown who received (1,525) votes? Are you seeing what I’m seeing?

Now, remember, the race for District Judge, 180th Criminal District Court between Tami Pierce (Republican) who received 534,011 votes for 49 98% of the vote, and Judge DaSean Jones (Democrat) who received 534,460 votes for 50 2% of the vote was only decided by 449 votes with 1,068,471 votes cast in this particular race

Comparatively speaking, and the race for Harris County Criminal Court at Law No 3, between Leslie Johnson (Republican), who received 529,649 votes, for 50 01%, and Porscha Natasha Brown (Democrat) who received 529,382 votes, for 49 99% of the vote was only decided by 267 votes with 1,059,031 votes cast in this particular race

SERIOUS QUESTIONS

How likely, is it that the race for the 180th Criminal District Court and County Criminal Court at Law No 3, would end up being the

only two races out of the (79) seventy-nine county-wide races in Harris County, Texas would end up with a (536 to 1,536) and (525 to 1,525) result in the same voter precinct? How do we know that (390) votes received by Governor Greg Abbott in PRECINCT #0039 is accurate? Don’t you find it to be a strange coincidence that Governor Greg Abbott received (390) votes in PRECINCT #0039, back during the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election? Do you see what I’m seeing precinct (39) and (390) votes for Governor Greg Abbott?

If you take a moment to review the breakdown of the votes received by the Democratic candidate and the Republican candidate in all (79) seventy-nine countywide races in PRECINCT #0039, you’re going to be astonished by the fact that the (536 to 1,536) and (525 to 1,525) vote total only occurred in two of the (79) seventy-nine down-ballot countywide races in Harris County, Texas back during the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election F i n a l l y, i f t h e “ O F F I C

E TOTA L S ” f o r t h e 1 8 0 t h C r i m i n a l

i

C o

r t a n d C o u n t y C r i m i n a l C o u r t a t L a w N o 3 , r a c e s ( u p o n f u r t h e r i n v e s t i g a t i o n ) t u r n o u t t o b e m a n u f a c t u r e d , m a n i p u l a t e d , o r i n a cc u r a t e , i t ’s g o i n g t o r a i s e s o m e s e r i o u s q u e s t i o n s a b o u t t h e v a l i d i t y / a c c u r a c y o f t h e “ O F F I C I A L V O T E TO TA L S ” p r o v i d e d t o u s b y C l i ff o r d Ta t u m , t h e H a r r i s C o u n t y E l e ct i o n s A d m i n i s t r a t o r f o r a l l ( 7 9 ) s e v e n - n i n e d o w n - b a l l o t r a c e s , t h a t a p p e a r e d o n t h e Tu e s d a y, N o v e m b e r 8 , 2 0 2 2

Judge, Cour t of Criminal Appeals, Pl. 6

#0039 REP - 544 DEM - 1,557

Chief Justice, 1st Cour t of Appeals #0039 REP - 435 DEM - 1,626

Justice, 1st Cour t of Appeals District , Pl. 4 #0039 REP - 466 DEM - 1,634

Justice, 14th Cour t of Appeals District , Pl. 2 #0039 REP - 465 DEM - 1,627

Justice, 14th Cour t of Appeals District , Pl. 9 #0039 REP - 525 DEM - 1,564

District Judge, 55th Judicial District

#0039 REP - 494 DEM - 1,581

District Judge, 113th Judicial District #0039 REP - 465 DEM - 1,612

District Judge, 157th Judicial District #0039 REP - 451 DEM - 1,622

District Judge, 180th Judicial District #0039 REP - 536 DEM - 1,536

District Judge, 182nd Judicial District #0039 REP - 465 DEM - 1,611

District Judge, 183rd Judicial District #0039 REP - 530 DEM - 1,548

District Judge, 184th Judicial District #0039 REP - 505 DEM - 1,570

District Judge, 185th Judicial District #0039 REP - 442 DEM - 1,637

District Judge, 189th Judicial District #0039 REP - 541 DEM - 1,522

District Judge, 190th Judicial District #0039 REP - 441 DEM - 1,631

District Judge, 208th Judicial District #0039 REP - 501 DEM - 1,570

District Judge, 209th Judicial District #0039 REP - 445 DEM - 1,627

District Judge, 228th Judicial District #0039 REP - 477 DEM - 1,587

District Judge, 230th Judicial District #0039 REP - 466 DEM - 1,600

District Judge, 232nd Judicial District #0039 REP - 439 DEM - 1,626

District Judge, 234th Judicial District #0039 REP - 443 DEM - 1,623

District Judge, 248th Judicial District #0039 REP - 468 DEM - 1,603

District Judge, 262nd Judicial District

#0039 REP - 537 DEM - 1,529

District Judge, 263rd Judicial District #0039 REP - 465 DEM - 1,601

District Judge, 269th Judicial District #0039 REP - 441 DEM - 1,610

District Judge, 270th Judicial District #0039 REP - 513 DEM - 1,542

District Judge, 281st Judicial District #0039 REP - 441 DEM - 1,615

District Judge, 295th Judicial District #0039 REP - 442 DEM - 1,604

District Judge, 482nd Judicial District #0039 REP - 506 DEM - 1,554

Family District Judge, 245th District #0039 REP - 474 DEM - 1,577

Family District Judge, 246th District #0039 REP - 444 DEM - 1,608

Family District Judge, 247th District #0039 REP - 426 DEM - 1,626

Family District Judge, 257th District #0039 REP - 437 DEM - 1,615

Family District Judge, 280th District #0039 REP - 464 DEM - 1,578

Family District Judge, 308th District #0039 REP - 470 DEM - 1,578

Family District Judge, 309th District #0039 REP - 435 DEM - 1,598

Family District Judge, 310th District #0039 REP - 433 DEM - 1,606

Family District Judge, 311th District #0039 REP - 459 DEM - 1,580

Family District Judge, 312th District #0039 REP - 446 DEM - 1,589

Family District Judge, 313th District #0039 REP - 466 DEM - 1,569

Family District Judge, 314th District #0039 REP - 436 DEM - 1,603

Family District Judge, 315th District #0039 REP - 432 DEM - 1,606

Count y Judge

#0039 REP - 528 DEM - 1,565

Judge, Count y Civil Cour t at Law No. 3

#0039 REP - 476 DEM - 1,575

Judge, Count y Civil Cour t at Law No. 4 #0039 REP - 444 DEM - 1,608

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 1 #0039 REP - 492 DEM - 1,569

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 2 #0039 REP - 526 DEM - 1,511

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 3 #0039 REP - 525 DEM - 1,525

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 4 #0039 REP - 488 DEM - 1,563

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 5 #0039 REP - 490 DEM - 1,563

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 6 #0039 REP - 465 DEM - 1,587

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 7 #0039 REP - 491 DEM - 1,563

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 8 #0039 REP - 469 DEM - 1,583

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 9 #0039 REP - 467 DEM - 1,581

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 10 #0039 REP - 501 DEM - 1,551

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 11 #0039 REP - 477 DEM - 1,571

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 12 #0039 REP - 498 DEM - 1,547

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 13 #0039 REP - 464 DEM - 1,576

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 14 #0039 REP - 517 DEM - 1,523

Judge, Count y Criminal Cour t No. 15 #0039 REP - 506 DEM - 1,530

Judge, Count y Probate Cour t No. 1 #0039 REP - 458 DEM - 1,582

Judge, Count y Probate Cour t No. 2 #0039 REP - 477 DEM - 1,564

Judge, Count y Probate Cour t No. 3 #0039 REP - 445 DEM - 1,590

Judge, Count y Probate Cour t No. 4 #0039 REP - 450 DEM - 1,586

District Clerk

#0039 REP - 505 DEM - 1,576

Count y Treasurer #0039 REP - 477 DEM - 1,590

“One of the most courageous community activist I know is Arthur “Art” Smith, the founder of the “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” that was instrumental in helping my investigative team and me in our quest to “FIGHT ELECTION FRAUD” in the November 8, 2022, Midterm Election

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: "The First Amendment (1791) prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition. Its Free Exercise Clause guarantees a person's right to hold whatever religious beliefs they want, and to freely exercise that belief, and its Establishment Clause prevents the federal government from creating an official national church or favoring

one set of religious beliefs over another

PATRIOTS

The amendment guarantees an individual's right to express and to be exposed to a wide range of opinions and views It was intended to ensure a free exchange of ideas, even unpopular ones. It also guarantees an individual's right to physically gather or associate with others in groups for economic, political, or religious purposes Additionally, it guarantees an individual's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances "

“THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW.” ©

SAFEGUARDING LIBERTY: "The First Amendment (1791) prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition Its Free Exercise Clause guarantees a person's right to hold whatever religious beliefs they want, and to freely exercise that belief, and its Establishment Clause prevents the federal government from creating an official national church or favoring one set of religious beliefs over another The amendment guarantees an individual's right to express and to be exposed to a wide range of opinions and views It was intended to ensure a free exchange of ideas, even unpopular ones It also guarantees an individual's right to physically gather or associate with others in groups for economic, political, or religious purposes. Additionally, it guarantees an individual's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Educating Christians On The Importance Of Voting

Encourage, Educate and Mobilize Pastors and their congregation to responsibly address their civic duties as Christian citizens.

ABOUT RECOVER AMERICA

RRecover America has remained active throughout the COVID lockdown, conducting dozens of Zoom Calls with outstanding Christian Leaders which you can access on this site and which remain very informative and relevant Dr Scarborough also launched his very successful podcast through Charisma Ministries working with his longtime friend who is the Owner and Founder, Mr Steve Strang These two men illustrate that Christians from differing faith backgrounds can find common ground at the foot of the cross and work together to advance the Kingdom Dr Scarborough often says: “I am very proud of my Southern Baptist roots I was provided an excellent Theological education at virtually no cost due to the kindness and generosity of millions of Southern Baptist Christians, but I learned a long time ago that God is big-

ger than our tags If you go to Heaven, your tag will drop off If you go to hell, your tag will burn off! One way or another they will all come off and the important thing is knowing that you know Jesus ”

Recover America is a nondenominational ministry, with Board Members representing both Charismatic and nonCharismatic churches, united in

their commitment to call believers from every faith persuasion who love God and love America to join us in our mission to take Jesus into the civil arena and provide Biblical solutions to practical problems We believe the Bible speaks to every area of life and that Pastors are the key to a Third Great Awakening Dr Scarborough’s podcast is appropriately called, Mixing Church and State God’s Way The success of the podcast has been very gratifying, with over 100,000 downloads in the first twelve months making it one of the most popular podcasts in the Charisma family of over 300 podcasters We have regular subscribers from around the world including Russia, Canada and Mongolia He has also written several new eBooks while working from his home, which you can access on the RAN site If you sign up for his weekly podcast you will automatically receive your gift copy of the eBook, Mixing Church

and State God’s Way

On May 10, 2021, Mr Hunter Kelly joined the Recover America Now Team as Vice President, leading the Communications and Social Media team and the Millennial Outreach efforts

Dr and Mrs Scarborough met and became acquainted with Hunter in Washington DC while facilitating Bible studies with members of Congress and other governmental leaders At the time, Hunter was working for Senator Tim Scott as a member of his Legislative team Hunter later joined the staff of Senator Josh Hawley, serving on his Communications team He brings a rich resumé of practical experience as well as a deep commitment to Christ Dr Scarborough recently spoke to our financial partners and commented that Hunter will enable us to reach a whole new generation of activists who love our Lord and our country

WWW.RECOVERAMERICA

DR. RICK SCARBOROUGH

Our Strategy

Our Mission

By Steven F Hotze, M D

The Bible clearly teaches that “All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God ” (Romans 3:23) This means that everyone has chosen to violate God’s standards, as written in the Scriptures, and is enslaved to sin and under God’s righteous judgment. God sent His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ,

to redeem us from the penalty of our sins and to give new life to anyone who would accept Him.

“For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death ” (Romans 8:2)

Biblical Christianity instructs us that in Christ we are free to practice whatever is good, right, honorable, holy and pure Our liberty in Christ Jesus does not give us license to do as we please “Live as free people, and do not use your freedom as a covering

for evil, but use it as a servant of God ” (1 Peter 2:16)

Atheistic Communism rejects God and His law, and exists in direct opposition to the revealed truth in the Bible Communism exalts the totalitarian state and its rulers as the final arbiters of right and wrong Biblical Christianity exalts God as the Sovereign Ruler of the universe His laws and standards have the ultimate authority on how an individual should conduct himself

Freedom and liberty for an individual, and for society at large, can only exist as we submit under the Sovereignty of Almighty God “His Kingdom is an everlasting Kingdom, and His dominion rules throughout all generations ” (Psalm 145:13)

Where God’s law is forsaken, there is tyranny “Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law strive with them ” (Proverbs 28:4)

Opposition to tyranny is obedience to God Christians must demonstrate the liberty that they have in Christ by opposing the forces of evil and wickedness that are seeking to destroy both Christianity and our American Constitutional Republic

SAFEGUARDING LIBERT Y...

T"The First Amendment (1791) prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition. Its Free Exercise Clause guarantees a person's right to hold whatever religious beliefs they want, and to freely exercise that belief, and its Establishment Clause prevents the federal government from creating an official national church or favoring one set of religious beliefs over another. The amendment guarantees an individual's right to express and to be exposed to a wide range of opinions and views. It was intended to ensure a free exchange of ideas, even unpopular ones. It also guarantees an individual's right to physically gather or associate with others in groups for economic, political, or religious purposes. Additionally, it guarantees an individual's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Our History

Way Engineering's quest for building excellence began in 1918 when a modest but dedicated refrigeration business opened its doors in Houston Way Engineering, Ltd is one of the nation’s largest and most experienced mechanical contractors We specialize in commercial air conditioning, plumbing, piping, and the maintenance of these systems Way Engineering is at the forefront of design build/design assist, preconstruction, commissioning, building information modeling, and quality control

Throughout the years, Way has excelled by pioneering new mechanical system technologies and always striving to be at the forefront of technological innovation As early as 1930, Way pioneered the use of ice as a cooling agent in early thermal storage air conditioning systems installed in churches and movie theaters, a technology used extensively today Innovation and education remain two of the cornerstones of the Way “building excellence” philosophy

McCorvey Companies purchased Way Engineering, LTD on December 3, 2012 It was an exciting venture for everyone involved The company relocated to 8610 Wallisville Rd, Houston,

TX With new offices, more warehouse space, and new state of the art machinery, Way Engineering is stronger than ever

The Way commitment to building excellence began in 1918 and McCorvey Companies will continue that excellence into the future