gair rhydd Monday May 28 2012 | freeword – Est. 1972 | Issue 981
£160,000 well spent?
gair rhydd investigates whether the £20,000-a-year Elected Officers kept to their election promises Sheri Hall, Laura Evans, Matt Jones and Ellen Atkinson News/Features Editors As sabbatical officers come to the end of their reign, gair rhydd has asked them what they have achieved this year as student representatives. With salaries of almost £20,000 a year, the eight elected officers have significant responsibility to represent the student body to the University and deliver on their election promises. Their role includes managing
the Students’ Union budget, communicating with members of staff and representing student interests. Officers are elected by students each year after an election process of manifestos, campaigning for votes, and chanting at the crossroads. When asked about the sabbatical elections, officers were generally in consensus over the nature of the process. Finance and Commercial Officer, Nick Matthew said: “The elections are 90% a popularity contest, and anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded in my opinion.”
The President, Marcus CoatesWalker agreed, saying that manifestos were irrelevant to elected officer’s roles: “I don’t think you should base a person on their manifesto - it should be based on whether or not you think they would be a good student representative.” However, most officers agreed that manifestos were a vital part of keeping the election process fair. The AU President, Ollie Devon said: “I think, to be honest, the manifestos are one of the only factors that stop it from being a popularity contest.” Despite this, none of the officers
were able to deliver everything on their manifestos. Oliver Smith said: “Manifestos are very outdated: the promises you make often have very little relation to what you actually do. When coming into the job, you have lots of projects you want to do, but you have many thrust upon you which you did not expect.” Asking elected officers whether prospective candidates should be more realistic in their manifesto aims, most of them disagreed, embracing the fresh ideas that are brought to the table by new officers. Societies officer, Harry New-
man said: “I think that one of the beauties of having elected students each year is that they do bring fresh ideas to the table. “It would be a real shame to advise people not to think big. “Ambition, there’s no problem with that at all. The issue is making promises that you know you can’t keep, just to win votes.”
have been up to over the past year...