Issue 10 Volume XXXVIII

Page 1

Observer the

SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 VOLUME XXXVIII, ISSUE 10

www.fordhamobserver.com

By COLIN SHEELEY News Editor

Editors from the Fordham Observer and the Fordham Ram met with Fordham President Rev. Joseph M. McShane, S.J. on the gray afternoon of Friday, Sept. 15 in the wood-panelled Council Room. We sat down at one half of the massive cluster of tables centered in the room, a bookshelf stocked with titles that could fulfill the CORE curriculum on one flank and an arrangement of cookies and packaged beverages sitting on an opposite table. A dark metal depiction of Icarus loomed in the corner next to the air conditioners. Both newspapers arrived with the same agenda, the same questions weighing on all of our minds. This is how Father McShane took them: What shall we do about DACA “The most important thing right now would be getting through to members of Congress, both the Senate and the House, and pressing them on this. Right now, we’re told that about 78 percent of the American population is in favor of DACA and want to see this handled. So, I would think sooner rather than later, the vote should be taken. “It’s in people’s minds, but more importantly it’s in people’s hearts right now; how important this is, how it speaks to the American soul, the American promise. And everybody, everybody has this story. “At Fordham, it’s in our DNA. We were founded by an immigrant, and the very reason for the foundation of what was Saint John’s College; there were two reasons: One, to preserve and pass on the faith in a very hostile environment. And the second was to break the cycle of poverty that immigrants were caught in. So this is our story, and

SIMON GIBBS/THE OBSERVER

We met with Father McShane at Cunniffe House to talk about DACA, the Dean Rodgers investigation, and many other topics.

in a very special way, the DACA students, both at Fordham and throughout the country are our people. We were founded to serve them, and it’s important for us to keep faith with that. “Congress is the way in right now. Nothing else matters. No one else counts. No one else can do it.

It’s the consciences of 535 women and men in the United States on Capitol Hill and they hold the future of this in their hands.” Communications and the general dissatisfaction on campus “In regard to communications, one of the things that I would like to do is have these kinds of meetings

regularly, and I’ll ask Bob to see if we can’t get that set maybe once or twice each semester, so there’s contact there ... I’m going to have a series of listening sessions where we have two each campus, each semester ... That’s the first. “The second is general tone and feeling on campus ... and I think

communications is part of it. That people feel that they weren’t getting enough information, B and they weren’t getting, whatever information they were getting, they weren’t getting it in a timely fashion. And maybe C, because they weren’t getsee MCSHANE pg. 3

Creating Conversation for a Better Fordham By LYDIA CULP Contributing Writer

At the core of the word “university” is its Latin root, “vers,” which means to turn, the same root found in the word “converse.” When we have a conversation, this can represent a turn of our opinion because when hearing a different view, we can gain a perspective we hadn’t previously seen or thought of. Conversation, then, when we consider its root, perhaps comes from the notion that the very purpose of speaking with others is to produce and turn to new ideas. I write about conversation because I believe that pure conversation— the type that serves the purpose of turning to, or acknowledging, new ideas—is lacking at Fordham. Too often I see a conversation that instead of a dialogue becomes a monologue of one prevailing opinion. For many at Fordham, this creates a space that feels safe and inviting because their opinions are the majority. While that safety can be a beautiful thing, it can too often lead to a danger zone.

Class discussions become an arena to air complaints about the “other side” and the people we freely call “they” who, unbeknownst to the majority, might be sitting in the same classroom. The reason this can become a dangerous path is that frequently, such discussions quickly deem those who dissent from the majority view as either bigots or uneducated people. Once we think the other side is filled with either bigots, who know their harm yet harbor prejudice, or uneducated people who are unenlightened (which, as I have observed, we seem to think are the only means by which someone could disagree with the majority opinion), the discussion ends. Speaking continues, but true, meaningful discussion or conversation is over. If the only way to disagree with the majority opinion is to be either uneducated or a bigot, few would be so brave as to disagree at all. “Good,” we may think. “If the other opinion displays nothing but unenlightened bigotry, we should shut it down to create a positive and healthy environment on campus.”

There are two reasons I believe this is wrong. One is that when we shut down debate, we produce mediocrity. If we are of the majority opinion, we have the luxury of assuming the premises of our argument and taking them for granted because we do not have to argue with someone who disagrees. Could we really argue with an intelligent counterpoint to our belief if we don’t believe such a thing exists? It is likely difficult to anticipate what such counterpoints could be if we haven’t heard them, especially from peers we respect. Furthermore, how can we truly know what we believe if it is not constantly challenged by perspectives that actually bother us? If we end every class wanting to pat our professor and peers on the back because of how in-line all of our opinions are, perhaps we are not growing much intellectually. Perhaps we are becoming intellectually enslaved because to question the majority is inconceivable due to our fear, laziness or the mere ease of avoiding such disagreements. The other reason that shutting

down debate is wrong is that the other opinion might not be a view made entirely of bigotry. Of course, we cannot know this if we do not invite debate. This is not meant to serve as a defense of hateful groups such as neo-Nazis or white supremacists. People, however, are hesitant to disagree in even the slightest way with the majority opinion for fear that their dissent will mark them as such. When people even question the majority opinion of a sensitive topic, we sometimes assume their entire worldview. We should welcome questioning, because it makes us wrestle with our views. Though our views may not change in response, they will be stronger, better educated and able to withstand more thorough scrutiny. It is difficult to truly know what we believe if we are not faced with intelligent dissent. I do not mean we should present the opinions of others at a surface level. I believe we should ask if there are people who disagree, and genuinely welcome debate. Anyone who disagrees with the opinion that is often

presented here at Fordham has likely deeply thought about and thoroughly researched their opinion to maintain it—it is easier to accept what professors and students around us say than it is to question the view that prevails and is asserted as morally superior. Professors and students should help to foster an environment that welcomes debate. This is not because I think people of the minority opinion on campus are disenfranchised or oppressed and need a voice. Regardless of whether that is true, we should welcome—even request—disagreements. Real debate promotes our intelligence and prepares us to truly defend our own opinions. More than that, it fosters a community that promotes the productive discussion that we need in our world. If we cannot welcome debate and bridge the gap between the aisles in a college classroom, it is difficult to expect our leaders in Washington to do the same. If we have conversations in the true sense of the word, we can produce better citizens and a greater hope for compromise in the world.

NEWS

OPINIONS

FEATURES

ARTS & CULTURE

SPORTS & HEALTH

The newest addition to the Lincoln Center campus.

One student’s satirical take on the new ram.

Junior publishes book of poems.

A look at this season’s most anticipated TV shows.

Your guide to the best NYC has to offer.

PAGE 2

PAGE 5

Say Hello to the Ram Satire

“Rose Notebook” PAGE 9

New This Fall PAGE 8

THE STUDENT VOICE OF FORDHAM LINCOLN CENTER

Unorthodox Workouts PAGE 11


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Issue 10 Volume XXXVIII by Fordham Observer - Issuu