More Milk
SASKATCHEWAN
IN THIS ISSUE:
KAP'S MANITOBA FARMERS' VOICE MAGAZINE
Calves benefit from more in the ration » PG 5
WINTER 2016 EDITION The Official Publication of the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan
MEMBER PROFILE
CAM WIEBE A passion for agriculture and a commitm ent to sustain the industry
SERVING MANITOBA FARMERS SINCE 1925 | Vol. 74, No. 51 | $1.75
December 22, 2016
Small flock producers appeal denied
manitobacooperator.ca
WINTER WONDERLAND
Existing operations will not be grandfathered into the new regulations say Manitoba Chicken Producers BY SHANNON VANRAES Co-operator staff
T
he Manitoba Chicken Producers have rejected an appeal on behalf of small farmers, who say a new specialty quota program will impose arbitrary and punitive costs on their operations. “This is a poor decision for Manitobans who care about where their food comes from, we hope the public will support us as we take this appeal to the Manitoba Farm Products Council,” said Phil Veldhuis, president of Direct Farm Manitoba, which launched the appeal. It’s the latest move in a monthslong dispute as the chicken marketing board attempts to corral all speciality chicken producers under the umbrella of a new, annual specialty quota program. Set to come into effect next year, the new quota program will result in the cancellation of both the Annual Farm Site Permit System and the Special Market Development and Servicing Policy. However, at least six operations with historic exemptions See SMALL FLOCKS on page 7 »
It was a cold Winter Wonderland this past weekend at the annual event at the Manitoba Agricultural Museum, but that didn’t keep attendees from coming out to catch the spirit of a pioneer Christmas. PHOTO: SANDY BLACK
Whither the Port of Churchill? Amid calls for a new owner or nationalization, some say no matter who owns the facility, companies won’t export grain through Canada’s only deepwater, arctic seaport BY ALLAN DAWSON Co-operator staff
Publication Mail Agreement 40069240
T
ime is running out for the Port of Churchill say its supporters, but according to others it can’t be saved. They say its fate was sealed Aug. 1, 2012, when the Canadian Wheat Board’s (CWB) monopoly died. “It is urgent,” ChurchillKeewatinook Aski MP Niki Ashton said Dec. 15 in an interview after calling for the federal government to nationalize the port currently owned by Denver-based OmniTrax, which closed the port in July, citing a lack of business. “The 2017 shipping season is
at risk and many people have said if we lose the 2017 season, the chances of the port reopening beyond that are slim to none.” In 2016 Churchill’s terminal, which opened in 1931, didn’t export any grain — likely the first time since World War II, Eldon Boon, a Virden farmer and president of the Hudson Bay Route Association (HBRA), a pro-Churchill lobby group, said Dec. 14 in an interview. In 2015 Churchill exported 184,000 tonnes, down considerably from the five-year average of around 500,000 tonnes. While the HBRA hopes new owners can be found instead of nationalization, it might have to come to that, Boon said.
“We have put forward a resolution saying this still needs to be done by January 2017 or we are at risk of losing another shipping season,” he said. “And I think if we lose two shipping seasons we have a big problem as far as keeping the grain side of things.” Ashton and Boon said Churchill is still a viable grain port and blamed OmniTrax for not working hard enough. But Rossendale, Man., farmer and long-time Churchill supporter Fred Tait says Churchill is done as a grain port. “It doesn’t matter the ownership of the port, grain is not going to go there,” he said in a Dec. 16 interview. “The multi-
nationals have no incentive to put grain through a facility they don’t own.” Tait and others predicted that in 2012. “On someting like this I hate to be proven right,” he added. T h e W h e a t B o a rd s a v e d around $20 a tonne for farme r s by u s i n g C h u rc h i l l t o serve certain markets, instead o f g o i n g t h r o u g h t h e St . Lawrence Seaway. Not only is Churchill closer by rail for some farmers, and closer to some overseas markets, but the port eliminated the double handle of grain loaded first on lakers at Thunder Bay and then unloaded at terminals See CHURCHILL on page 6 »
KAP CONTINUES: Group still working on carbon proposals » PAGE 3