Manitoba co operator

Page 1

Eye in the sky

It’s a Nellie!

Tracking crops by satellite » PG 15

For MWI » PG 3

SERVING MANITOBA FARMERS SINCE 1925 | Vol. 74, No. 7 | $1.75

February 18, 2016

Grain shippers want emergency rules extended Key clauses expire Aug. 1 BY ALLAN DAWSON Co-operator staff

G

rain companies and farm groups want the federal government to extend regulations brought to deal with the grain transportation crisis of 2013-14 before they expire Aug. 1. The legislation formally known as Bill C-30 made several changes to the Canada Transportation Act, including expanding interswitching within 160 km of an interchange, instead of 30. It’s a valuable competitive tool grain shippers are using and want to keep, Wade Sobkowich, executive director of the Western Grain Elevators Association (WGEA), which represents Western Canada’s main grainhandling companies, said in an interview Feb. 10. There’s more interswitching occurring than many people expected, said Canada’s grain transportation monitor, Mark Hemmes, president of Quorum Corporation. The C-30 provisions came with a “sunset” clause because they were passed under emergency legislation. The former Conservative government was responding to a huge backlog in grain shipments by rail in 2013-14, a backlog that cost grain farmers at least $5 billion, according to University of Saskatchewan agricultural economist Richard Gray. The other provisions set to expire in less than six months include allowing the federal cabinet to order the railways to transport a minimum volume of grain and the Canadian Transportation Agency to compensate any person for expenses caused by a railway’s failure to fulfil its service obligations. A new definition of “operational terms” in service-level agreements will also end. It helped clarify cases eligible for the Canadian Transportation Agency arbitration. “They were positive provisions and we are of the view that… they (government) should make those provisions in Bill C-30 permanent,” Sobkowich said. Many farm organizations agree, including the Manitoba See GRAIN on page 6 »

manitobacooperator.ca

‘Collaboration’ the new buzzword for commodity groups Fear of checkoff fatigue is driving the discussion about working together BY ALLAN DAWSON Co-operator staff

M

anitoba’s major checkofffunded farm commodity groups are working with a consultant to explore increased collaboration aimed at giving farmers more bang for their levy bucks. “We are excited to see what this may evolve into and we are just at the initial stage,” Reston farmer and Manitoba Wheat and Barley Growers Association (MWBGA) chair Fred Greig told the association’s annual meeting Feb. 11 during Crop Connect in Winnipeg. The other groups involved are the Manitoba Corn Growers Association, Manitoba Canola Growers Association, the Manitoba Pulse and Soybean Association and National Sunflower Growers Association. “(H)ow long can we sustain the current model of multiple associations providing overlapping representation to the same membership?” Kyle Friesen, Altona farmer and outgoing chair of the Manitoba Pulse and Soybean Growers Association (MPSGA) wrote in the association’s annual report. “I see a great opportunity to improve efficiency of grower levy funds through collaboration, communication and possibly consolidation.” In a later interview, Greig didn’t rule out the possibility of following Ontario’s lead. Its barley, corn, oat, soybean, and wheat associations came together to form one organization called the Grain Farmers of Ontario. “I don’t think producers require another level of bureaucracy, so if we can streamline more of the dollars to go to research and market development that would be good,” he said. Merging could create economies by sharing an office and staff, Greig said. In addition to being more efficient, a

Brent Kosie of Canterra Seeds (r) speaks to Anand Aneja while looking at seed samples at Crop Connect 2016 in Winnipeg. More than 600 farmers attended the annual two-day conference and trade show.   Photo: Shannon VanRaes

bigger organization could attract more experienced staff, he added. It’s not a new concept. In early 2013, Halbstadt-area farmer Danny Penner called on Canadian crop growers to form a national association so checkoff dollars for research, policy development and lobbying are used more efficiently and effectively. “It may not happen from this initiative, but it will happen,” Penner predicted during an interview March 7, 2013. “It has to happen and if it doesn’t

happen we’re going to be in trouble because we’re going to lose control of our own industry.”

Checkoff fatigue Farmers were already complaining about checkoff fatigue, and that was before the MWBGA was created. While Penner was proposing a single national organization, current talks involve only Manitoba commodSee COLLABORATION on page 6 »

TPP: Poultry farmers seek answers » PAGE 11


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.