MASC reviews coverage for U.S. wheats » PG 8
Infrared grain sorting comes to Winnipeg » PG 18
SERVING MANITOBA FARMERS SINCE 1925 | Vol. 73, No. 22 | $1.75
May 28, 2015
manitobacooperator.ca
Cattle producers seek protection from residential neighbours
Pressure mounts for COOL change
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
WTO ruling sets the stage for its repeal By Alex Binkley with files from Jennifer Paige and Reuters
Manitoba municipality ignores its own bylaw in the endeavour to develop rural residential property
Co-operator contributor/ Co-operator staff
T
he United States has three months to repeal its countryof-origin labelling program on beef and pork imports before Canada and Mexico will proceed with billions of dollars’ worth of retaliatory tariffs on American goods. In the wake of the World Trade Organization’s final decision May 18 that COOL violates international trade rules, the House of Representatives agriculture committee approved a plan to labelling laws. The chairman of the committee has said he expected an early-June vote on the bill. U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says changing the law is the only way to avoid having American food and consumer good exports to its two neighbours hit with hefty duties. See COOL on page 7 »
Aaron Holliday and his wife, Leanne and daughter, Brooklyn, run a 250-head operation half a mile from the proposed residential subdivision. Photo: Jennifer Paige
BY JENNIFER PAIGE Co-operator staff / Carberry, Man.
Publication Mail Agreement 40069240
A
rea livestock operators say they fear being squeezed out by a proposed residential development their municipality has approved based on false information and in contravention of local bylaws. Residents opposed to the project say the developer behind a proposed 96-acre housing development east of Carberry failed to disclose in his rezoning application that there are livestock operations nearby. The land is close to three longstanding livestock feedlots. “On the subdivision application, Section 5-D asks if there are any of the following within 1.6 kilometres or one mile of the proposed lots — livestock
feedlots or waste disposal grounds. The developer neglected to check off livestock operations and waste disposal ground active or inactive,” said local resident, Judy Harder during the bylaw’s second reading, held in Carberry on May 11. Along with an inactive waste site that has been at the same location for the past 30 years, the proposed subdivision is within a half-mile of a 250-plushead cattle operation owned by Aaron Holliday, 1.5 miles west of Graham Farms’ 100-head-plus feedlot and within two miles of Peter and Donna Pingert’s 1,500head feedlot operation. Yet the RM of North Cypress-Langford and the Cypress District Planning Board are on the verge of amending a zoning bylaw that would see the land east of Carberry, rezoned from Agricultural General Rural District to Rural Residential
for the development of 16, five- to sixacre lots. Even though final approval has not yet been granted, development and sale of the lots has already started, leaving residents to further question the process. “I am currently running 250-plushead of cattle and if the development is approved, I won’t be able to expand,” said Holliday, who farms half a mile from the proposed subdivision. “This is a welldesigned facility that is capable of handling many more cattle than I am running now. If this subdivision happens, my options will be restricted.” He was among local residents who have attended public hearings to oppose the development. Stuart Olmstead, chairman of the See SUBDIVISION on page 6 »
MEAT IMPORTS: More competition on home front » PAGE 13