Still sprayable
You can start the tractor Fertilizer spreading date moved to April 1 » Pg 9
Province clarifies policy on cosmetic pesticides » Pg 3
April 9, 2015
SERVING MANITOBA FARMERS SINCE 1925 | Vol. 73, No. 15
No Roundup Ready alfalfa production for 2015
|
$1.75
manitobacooperator.ca
Connecting with the farm at the Royal
Forage Genetics International will allow 20 demonstration plots in Eastern Canada By Allan Dawson co-operator staff
G
enetically modified (GM) Roundup Ready alfalfa will not be sold commercially in Canada this year and it’s unclear when, if ever, it will be commercialized in Western Canada. “At this time FGI does not have plans to introduce biotech-enhanced alfalfa traits to growers in Western Canada,” Forage Genetics International (FGI), the company selling the GM alfalfa, said in a “Stakeholder Update” issued last month. However, the U.S.-based company says work is underway to develop a “hay-to-hay” coexistence plan for the West. “The goal is to have this plan completed by January 2016,” FGI said. “This Western Canada plan is being developed in response to requests for additional stewardship to address the possibility of product moving from Ontario ( a n d ) Q u e b e c t o We s t e r n Canada.” Heather Kerschbaumer, president of Forage Seed Canada, which represents forage seed growers, welcomes FGI’s efforts See ROUNDUP on page 7 »
Last week’s Royal Manitoba Winter Fair strived to spread some agriculture awareness with its Thru the Farm Gate exhibits. Educational and entertaining demonstrations, interactive stations and a variety of farm animals, including dairy cows, piglets, beef cattle, sheep, goats and alpacas were available to fairgoers. photo: jennifer paige
On-farm scientific research saves Westman producers big bucks What started off as a way to answer questions on one farm has evolved into a research business other farmers can access By Allan Dawson co-operator staff / portage la prairie
Publication Mail Agreement 40069240
A
dam Gurr says he and his partners have discovered a way to save more than a million dollars over their farming career, and they’re sharing it with others. Gurr, who farms 4,800 acres near Rapid City and Brandon with his father Barr y and brother-in-law Stephen Vajdic, isn’t peddling a miracle product. Their money-saving discovery is cutting the amount of canola seed planted without hurting yield. And it’s just one of many agronomic insights they’ve unearthed through scientifically conducted farm-scale research available now through their company Agritruth.
Three years of testing three seeding rates, and planting canola no earlier than midMay using terrain-following openers with no till resulted in very little (zero to 15 per cent) plant mortality. More viable plants means seeding rates can be safely reduced, cutting seed costs. “For canola with a 1,000-kernel weight of five grams we will seed at 3-1/2 to four pounds (an acre) and save between $10 and $21 an acre,” Gurr told an Agvise Laboratories’ meeting here March 18. “If canola seed had a four-gram, 1,000-kernel weight we’ll seed at 2.8 to 3.2 pounds, saving $18 to $30 an acre. Annual farm savings are in the neighbourhood of $30,000 to $40,000 and for the
rest of my 22 years of farming compounded it works out to a million and a half (dollars). And it didn’t cost a lot to set that trial up either.” The recommended canola seeding rate is much higher at five pounds an acre. The goal is to get 14 to 26 plants per square foot for a final plant stand of seven to 14. “It assumes a mortality rate of 50 per cent, which is the safe thing to do,” Gurr said. “With seeding rates I think there is an opportunity to narrow the ranges in all crops and refine those recommendations specific to certain systems,” Gurr said later in an interview. “Industry recommendations have to be very safe. They’ve got to work everywhere.”
Unexpected results
Some of their research results have been surprising. One trial comparing a 60- and 130pound rates of nitrogen found no difference in wheat yields. “This was in a high-yield environment with 90-bushel (an acre) red spring wheat,” he said. “We saw differences in protein, which of course affected the economics of it, but it was not what I would’ve expected.” On-farm spring wheat variety trials have also shown different results than small-plot experiments, Gurr said. Harvest wheat is rated very poor for fusarium head blight, but on their farm they’ve found when sprayed See RESEARCH on page 6 »