Gnn150120

Page 1

Volume 41, Number 2  |  JANUARY 20, 2015

$4.25

PRACTICAL PRODUCTION TIPS FOR THE PRAIRIE FARMER

www.grainews.ca

Farmers say some low-quality grain grades inconsistent Grain quality has taken a beating from hail, moisture and disease. Now some farmers report facing uneven wheat and durum grading at the elevator By Lisa Guenther

Publications Mail Agreement Number 40069240

photos: lisa guenther

S

ome farmers are still hurting from a poor growing season and harvest at elevators this winter, as they struggle with inconsistent grading. “The condition of this year’s durum crop leaves a lot to be desired,” Jim Wickett said. Wickett farms near Rosetown, Sask., and sits on the Western Standards  Committee,  which makes recommendations to the Canadian  Grain  Commission (CGC) regarding grain grading standards and specifications. Wicket said less than four per cent of durum was grading No. 1, according to information from the CGC and CWB’s Bruce Burnett. Wickett cautioned that there’s no way of knowing whether each grain sample sent to the CGC’s Harvest Sample program represent a 4,000-bushel pile or a 10,000-bushel pile, so the CGC has to extrapolate numbers. But Wickett said over the years “they’ve been pretty darn close doing that.” Harvest was long and drawnout for one Saskatchewan farmer contacted for this story (he asked his name be withheld from the paper, and Grainews agreed to do so for this story). Hail, frost, excess spring moisture and root disease all took a toll in 2014. As harvest began, “lentils were yielding really well, but the durum was looking quite sad and we knew we were going to have some issues marketing at least some of it,” he wrote via email. He said he didn’t have many issues selling lentils — one buyer even took some lowerquality lentils without a discount. But durum was another matter. The farmer sent durum samples to three grain companies. He also sent samples to SGS, a third-party that grades grain for a fee.

The Canadian Grain Commission received over 10,000 samples for the 2014 Harvest Sample program, up from 7,300 in 2013. “Results that came back from all of the grain companies were all over the map — fusarium and vomi numbers were incredibly inconsistent, along with HVK (hard vitreous kernels) numbers differing by over 50 per cent,” he wrote. One company would grade a bin a three, while another company would call the same bin a five, he wrote. “SGS provided HVK on all samples which were higher than any of the grain companies,” he added. The Saskatchewan farmer also sent 2013 durum, which he said was clearly a good two. Companies graded it a four or five, he wrote. Wickett has been participating in the CGC’s Harvest Sample program for about four years now. The program provides a free, non-binding

grade on samples provided by farmers, along with data on the new crop for international customers. This year Wickett had a handle on what his better crops should grade, so he sent in samples for the crops with more fusarium. He said grades assigned by CGC and elevators have been “fairly consistent” over the years. “I mean, there’s been times where something might be a three and someone else is a two. I’ve never had real drastic swings. I have heard of those,” Wickett said. Fusarium is moving into durumgrowing areas, Wickett said. And farmers lack a little bit of knowledge in the grading department, he added. “We might look at a sample and

think: ‘Eh, it’s not that bad.’ And once it’s finally examined a little closer with a grading eye, you start picking out some of the things,” said Wickett. Brian Otto, who farms near Warner, Alta., also sent grain to the Harvest Sample program. He said the elevator gave him the durum grade he was after, “but it took a little bit of a struggle to get it. And it’s all about grain samples to the Grain Commission.” The local elevator graded Otto’s durum a three. Otto and the elevator sent a sample to the CGC for a binding grade, under the Subject to Inspector’s Grade and Dockage program. In the end, he got a two. Otto said many farmers are running into the same problem.

In This Issue

“They’re grading really hard this year,” he said. At interview time, Otto and the elevator had sent a representative sample from his spring wheat to the CGC for a binding grade as well. Otto doesn’t worry that seeking a bind grade will jeopardize his business relationship with his local elevator. The elevator guy he deals with understands, he said. And farming is a business, he added. “Once you start dropping grades in durum, your price drops substantially. So you have to be careful there.” Another Saskatchewan farmer had a different experience with the Harvest Sample program. She drew samples from three different grain bins of Canadian Western

Wheat & Chaff .................. 2 Features . ........................... 5 Crop Advisor’s Casebook . 16 Columns ............................ 22 Machinery & Shop............. 29 Cattleman’s Corner .......... 35

New crop roundup

Andrea hilderman page 18

Field fuel and service trailers scott garvey page 29

FarmLife ............................ 40


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.