Farmers Weekly NZ November 2018

Page 30

Opinion

30 FARMERS WEEKLY – farmersweekly.co.nz – November 19, 2018

Cut off the propaganda money Alternative View

Alan Emerson

THERE’S a row brewing between the Government and Fish and Game and it’s going to be an interesting battle. Legislation before Parliament, the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill, gives the Conservation Department wide powers to protect indigenous fish. In Parliament Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage said “We need to prevent the loss of any more native freshwater fish species and restore the health of their populations and fisheries.” So the legislation provides better tools to manage both indigenous fish and noxious fish like koi carp. I’d add trout and salmon to the latter category. Sage did admit in April both trout and salmon eat native fish. National’s conservation spokeswoman Sarah Dowie said “DoC’s native fish plans would actually take precedence over sports fish plans.” National will support

BAD AND BADDER: Ducks not only eat native fish but also pollute the water.

the legislation to the select committee. The freshwater fish Sage is out to encourage include bullies, eels, lamprey, mudfish, smelt, torrentfish and whitebait. With the exception of mature eels and lampreys they all fall into the category of food for trout, salmon or ducks. With ducks you have a

complication in that they are rampant excreters of E coli. So, I suggest you can’t preserve our indigenous freshwater fish and tolerate trout, salmon and ducks. Fish and Game aren’t happy, which is nothing new. As a licence holder I received a passionate email from them urging me to contact my local

GLENGARRY POLL DORSET

52ND ANNUAL SALE Monday, December 3rd, 2018 – 1pm Feilding Saleyards, Manchester Street, Feilding

130 Rams up for Auction Why you should buy a Glengarry ram: • 42 years performance recording • Major emphasis on growth, survival and muscling • All sires DNA tested for footrot and muscling genes • No. 1 ranked Terminal Sire 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010 & 2017 (SIL ACE list) • 550 stud ewes means only the best rams are sold • Four Rams in Top 10 2017 SIL Terminal Growth • Finalist in two categories at 2017 Sheep Industry awards.

Callum Stewart 0272 802 688 Maurice Stewart 0272 469 255 Ryan Shannon 027 565 0979

LK0095262©

For ram and semen enquiries contact Ross & Ben Pratt today: Ross 06 323 3827 • RD 5, Feilding Ben 027 2356 577 • RD 2, Kimbolton • benpratt@xtra.co.nz

politician because the Bill presents a serious threat to trout, could allow the removal of trout and salmon from waterways and allow the sale of trout fishing rights in Treaty of Waitangi settlements. Legal opinion of the treaty issue is at variance with F&G’s emotively charged diatribe. F&G supremo Martin Taylor said it isn’t trout eating threatened species but 95% of the reduction in native fish is due to water quality. While that’s F&G’s typical antifarming rhetoric it is wrong in fact. Indigenous fish numbers declined even when the water was pristine and they need lesser quality water to survive than trout and salmon do. We should also remember trout are on the Invasive Species Specialist Group’s list of the world’s 50 most invasive fish species. Trout compete with native fish for habitat and food. They are highly successful predators and not native to NZ. We have put two of the 50 most invasive fish species on a pedestal and given them protection over that given to indigenous fish. Further, NZ freshwater scientist A D Huryn in 1998 compared algal biomass in streams with invasive trout and those with our native freshwater fish species called galaxiids. The research showed algal growth was six times higher in water with invasive trout even though nutrient levels were the same. So, agriculture isn’t the major problem with indigenous fish, It is the invasive and introduced trout and salmon and the invasive and polluting duck. If you’re serious about native fish support you need to get rid of trout, salmon and ducks. It is a fish and duck issue and not a problem for farming. The issue F&G has is they’re on their own. They’ve arrogantly

burned off approaches from other organisations. As the result of an Official Information Act request I found that in February this year Federated Farmers president Katie Milne wrote a most conciliatory letter to F&G chairman Lindsay Lions, probably as the result of his chief executive’s anti-farming outburst at the Fieldays. In his reply Lyons went back to 2001 when Federated Farmers had criticised F&G. Why? I have no idea who I might have criticised and offended 17 years ago. Move on. The rest of the letter I would describe as shallow, predictable and emotive. Lyons agreed to meet on the condition Feds agreed to discuss four issues, starting by asking the question is the environmental impact of farming on our waterways unacceptable and finishing with, should the cost of restoring waterways fall on those who have polluted them. What unbridled arrogance, totally ignoring the reality that water quality is improving and many rivers are fine. F&G should also be careful about the costs of cleaning up waterways. Could they be responsible for cleaning up the pollution caused by all the waterfowl crapping at will in our waterways? The fact remains, if we are serious about restoring our native fish we need to get rid of salmon, trout and ducks. It must also be obvious to the Government the fat licence fees F&G receives to fund their political lobbying and public relations campaigns should be removed. The licence fee should support the core business and be a fraction of its current price. Why should a farmer or native fish supporter have to pay a licence fee when a large part of that money is used for anti-farmer or antiGovernment activities?


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.