The Emory Wheel Since 1919
Emory University’s Independent Student Newspaper
Volume 103, Issue 7
Printed every other wednesday
Wednesday, April 13, 2022
Constitutional Council holds Friese v. SGA hearing By Madi Olivier News Editor The Constitutional Council held a hearing for the case Friese v. SGA on April 11, following plaintiffs Emma Friese (24C) and Sruti Kumar’s (20Ox, 22C) challenge to the constitutionality of the March 29 run-off election for Student Government Association (SGA) president. Friese and Kumar met while doing campaign work for former SGA presidential candidate Elisabet Ortiz (24C), who was disqualified from the election on March 16 due to her enrollment status as a gap-year student. Ortiz, who later dropped out of the race, urged students to vote “no confidence,” alleging that the Code of Elections only permitting fulltime students to run is unfair to their disenfranchised peers. The plaintiffs submitted the challenge to the Constitutional Council last week, alleging that SGA governing documents do not contain any “identifiable written procedure for how to fulfill the rules of a ‘no confidence’ win, resulting in a Constitutional Crisis.” This alleged lack of procedure in the SGA governing documents was the main focus of the hearing. Citing the “pervasiveness of these ambiguities [which] includes a lack of explicit written procedure for a no confidence victory,” Friese noted that “such lack of procedure forced the Board of Elections to misuse or interpret authority, both by making extreme interpretations not aligned with the direct nature with which the Board of Elections is supposed to abide by the code of elections, and by interpreting the SGA constitution, which they do not have the authority to do.” Part III Article 2 Section I of the SGA code of elections states that “in the event
that ‘no confidence’ wins, then the position shall be considered vacant, and rules governing vacancies in each governing body shall apply.” Although the SGA constitution does not make an explicit reference to a “no confidence” majority vote, the document outlines in Article V Section 2, the line of succession following the president as the executive vice president, then the speaker of the legislature, followed lastly by a ranking member of the legislature. Friese noted that although the SGA documents outline how to fill vacancies in other positions, they do not explicitly do the same for the office of the president. “It's very jarring that it's just absent how to fill a presidential vacancy,” Friese said. “That would be a fairly easy remedy and would honestly solve a lot of issues that were present in this case.” The Board of Elections interpreted these documents when the general presidential election advanced to a run-off between Alyssa Stegall (21Ox, 23C) and “no confidence” on March 25, as well as when “no confidence” won the SGA presidential run-off election on March 29. Zelnick said the office of SGA president was considered vacant, so the Board deemed that vice-president elect Noah Marchuck (24C) would assume the position of SGA president and appoint a new vice president. Zelnick explained that Marchuck will be sworn in as vice president first before succession protocols are carried out to make him SGA president. Outgoing SGA President Rachel Ding (20Ox, 22B) noted that a similar situation arose during the spring 2021 election, when the Oxford SGA presidential seat was left vacant by a win of “no confidence.” In this instance, the vice president-elect, who was chosen in a run-off election, took over the position of president.
A lly Hom/Photo Editor
Friese and Kumar argued that without clear procedure, the Board did not have the authority to correctly interpret the documents. When asked by Constitutional Council Justice Jane Wang (22C) if the plaintiffs are "saying the [presidential] position is supposed to remain vacant until the next election," Friese responded that she does not know the best way to remedy the situation, as she is not a legislature on SGA. Friese added that the Board’s decision was not “inherently wrong or illogical” given the stipulations available in the governing documents, but that the main issue was the lack of clear procedure. Friese explained that she believes it is the responsibility of the Board to “thoroughly understand” the code of elections and address any ambiguities before the start of the election cycle, and that the Board “violate[d] its own rules” by instituting new elections regulations during the election cycle.
However, Ding said she was not aware of any ambiguities in the election code prior to the 2022 election, and that the Board has the power to make such interpretations. “I don't think that it's reasonable to ask a student to predict all future vagueness or all future situations of the elections code, but I do think that it is the responsibility of students in the Elections Board to actually read the code of elections,” Ding said. “That is at a bare minimum.” Ding added that the code of elections is a “working document” and the entire SGA legislature and cabinet spent a minimum of a month during fall 2021 looking at code changes each week, ultimately passing three bills to “amend and improve the code.” “These so-called ‘ambiguities’ regarding 'no confidence' in the code … were not realized in the fall of 2021 by anyone sitting on this hearing today,” Ding said. SGA Attorney General Stewart Zelnick (20Ox, 22C), who represented SGA during
the hearing, also refuted Friese’s claim, saying that while the Board is not against making necessary changes, they are granted the authority to make interpretations regarding election cycles. He cited Part II Article 1 Clause L, which states that the Board should “exercise all powers incident to and necessary for the execution of the above-listed responsibilities,” which includes overseeing the election race for SGA president. “The Board's interpretation regarding the 'no confidence' vote was necessary to uphold the value of student representation,” Zelnick said. “Elections for the office of SGA president are always decided by majority share of the vote to ensure that the elected president is in support of the majority of the participating student body voters.” Elections Board Chair Mild Trakarnsakdikul (19Ox, 22B) agreed, saying the interpretations made by the Board were necessary during the election.
‘My worst fears coming true’: Emory reflects on Russian invasion
Single honor code proposed for all undergraduate schools
By Katie Bartlett & Meghan Gupte Oxford Campus Desk & Contributing Writer Seven weeks after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered Russian forces to invade Ukraine on Feb. 24, Russian bombs, missiles and soldiers continue to attack the country. As the conflict escalates, Emory University students and faculty follow the war closely. However, many Emory community members have connections to Ukraine and Russia, leaving them concerned for their friends, family and homeland. Personal connections Professor of Russian Literature Elena Glazcov-Corrigan was born in Moscow. Following Putin’s 2014 invasion and later annexation of the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine, Glazcov-Corrigan began visiting Ukraine frequently instead of Russia due to Russia’s “repressive atmosphere.” “I did not respect the mood inside the country, evident in my circle of former acquaintances who believed that the invasion was something to overlook and all in the end would be okay,” Glazcov-Corrigan said. In Ukraine, she developed many close friendships and found a “truly inspiring community” through her involvement with a publishing house in Kyiv. Glazcov-Corrigan views Russia’s current
Ukrainian invasion as “a national grief.” “I’m stunned and I’m grieving,” GlazcovCorrigan said. “The invasion itself was a crime and the way it has been handled is a crime.” Glazcov-Corrigan also expressed solidarity with Russian protestors, whose decision to speak out leaves them in danger. Emory graduate student and Ukrainian citizen Anastasiia Strakhova (22G), said that her mother escaped Ukraine following the invasion. Strakhova said that her mother initially “didn’t believe that Putin [was] going
to attack civilians.” Once this fear was realized, Strakhova’s mother sheltered in place, where she would “hear explosions and see missiles” from her window. Strakhova then urged her mother to take the train to Lviv, Ukraine. After difficulty reaching the train station and securing a legitimate train ride due to phony train tickets and miles of abandoned cars blocking roadways, her mother reached Lviv, crossed the Polish border and flew to Frankfurt, Germany to meet Strakhova.
NEWS Students Elect OxSGA Representatives ... PAGE 3 P
OPINION Emory Forgets About Oxford PAGE 4 Academics (Again) ...
A&E ‘Everything Everywhere All at Once’ PAGE 7 Review...
A nusha Kurapati/Staff Illustrator
See FRIESE, Page 2
Assistant Professor of Finance Tetyana Balyuk also has family who were forced to evacuate. At the start of the war, her parents, sister and other relatives were still living in Ukraine, but many had to leave their homes for safer parts of the country. Balyuk moved from Ukraine to Canada in 2012 to obtain a Ph.D. in finance from the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management. She has lived in Atlanta since Emory hired her in 2017. “Due to the time difference between the U.S. and Ukraine, I fear to wake up in the morning and realize that I missed something important — a new threat or a turning point in the war,” Balyuk said. “It would be less stressful for me if my parents and sister came to me, but they chose not to,” Balyuk said. “They want to be with their people during these horrible times and help in whatever way they can.” Balyuk also highlighted Ukraine’s changing political scene accompanying the start of the war, noting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has become “a symbol of Ukrainian resilience.” “We saw disagreements between political opponents in Ukraine, as in any democracy, in the past, but [now] they all stand side-byside in the face of Russian military aggression,” Balyuk said. “Ukraine’s courage and strength is truly in its people.” Ana Tsulaia (24C) is from the country of Georgia, 20% of which is occupied by Russia.
The Emory College Honor Council unanimously approved revisions to the Honor Code, stipulating that the same Honor Code be applicable to all undergraduate students. All enrolled undergraduates in Emory College are eligible to vote on the proposal from April 18-20. The proposed revisions aim to establish one Honor Code for Emory College, the Goizueta Business School, the Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing and Oxford College, according to the March 29 email announcement from Associate Dean and Director of the Honor Council Jason Ciejka (11G, 17L). Each undergraduate school currently administers its own Honor Code with different procedures, which Ciejka explained has historically been the case for Emory’s schools. “Emory is fairly decentralized as a university and as an institution,” Ciejka said. “This is a good move, at least for the undergraduates, to get us all on the same page, so that you all have consistency and you know what's expected.”
See SCHOLARS, Page 3
See STUDENT, Page 3
EMORY LIFE
By Lauren Baydaline Asst. Multimedia Editor
SPORTS The Price of
Ukrainian students support Greatness ... P AGE 9 relatives ...
Back Page