Criminal law: cases and materials [connected casebook] (aspen casebook) 8th all chapter instant down

Page 1


Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://ebookmass.com/product/criminal-law-cases-and-materials-connected-caseboo k-aspen-casebook-8th/

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Constitutional Law [Connected Casebook] (Aspen Casebook) New Edition

https://ebookmass.com/product/constitutional-law-connectedcasebook-aspen-casebook-new-edition/

Conflict of Laws: Cases and Materials (Aspen Casebook Series) 7th Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/conflict-of-laws-cases-andmaterials-aspen-casebook-series-7th-edition-ebook-pdf/

Criminal Law: Case Studies and Controversies (Aspen Casebook Series) 4th Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/criminal-law-case-studies-andcontroversies-aspen-casebook-series-4th-edition-ebook-pdf/

Property [Connected Casebook] (Aspen Casebook) 9th Edition

https://ebookmass.com/product/property-connected-casebook-aspencasebook-9th-edition/

Property Law: Rules, Policies, and Practices [Casebook Connect] (Aspen

https://ebookmass.com/product/property-law-rules-policies-andpractices-casebook-connect-aspen/

Federal Taxation of Wealth Transfers: Cases and Problems (Aspen Casebook Series)

https://ebookmass.com/product/federal-taxation-of-wealthtransfers-cases-and-problems-aspen-casebook-series/

Criminal Procedure: Investigation (Aspen Casebook Series) 3rd Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/criminal-procedure-investigationaspen-casebook-series-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/

Constitutional Law (Aspen Casebook Series) 5th Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/constitutional-law-aspen-casebookseries-5th-edition-ebook-pdf/

Wills Trusts & Estates, Tenth Edition [Connected Casebook] (Aspen Casebook) 10th

https://ebookmass.com/product/wills-trusts-estates-tenth-editionconnected-casebook-aspen-casebook-10th/

About Wolters Kluwer Legal& Regulatory US

Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory US delivers expert content and solutions in the areas of law, corporate compliance, health compliance, reimbursement, and legal education. Its practical solutions help customers successfully navigate the demands of a changing environment to drive their daily activities, enhance decision quality and inspire confident outcomes.

Serving customers worldwide, its legal and regulatory portfolio includes products under the Aspen Publishers, CCH Incorporated, Kluwer Law International, ftwilliam.com and MediRegs names. They are regarded as exceptional and trusted resources for general legal and practice-specific knowledge, compliance and risk management, dynamic workflow solutions,andexpert commentary.

In memory of John Kaplan, 1929–1989

Preface

Acknowledgments Special

ATTRIBUTIONOFCRIMINALITY

CONTENTS Preface

Acknowledgments

Special Notice

INTRODUCTION

A.TheCareer of aCriminal Case

1.ProcedureBeforeTrial

DonaldDripps,Criminal JusticeProcess

2.SubstantiveLegal IssuesBeforeTrial

3.Procedureat Trial

4.SubstantiveLegal IssuesonAppeal

B.Sourcesof Criminal Law

1.Statutes

2.Precedent

3.Constitutions

C.TheAnalysisof Criminal Liability

1.ThePurposeof Analysis

2.TheModel Penal CodeScheme

3.TheGermanScheme

D.Burdensof Proof andDueProcess

THEPURPOSESANDLIMITSOFPUNISHMENT

A.AnIntroductoryProblem

NotesandQuestions

B.Utilitarianism andRetributivism

JohnBraithwaite& PhilipPettit,Not Just Deserts: ARepublican Theoryof Criminal Justice

C.UtilitarianPunishment

1.TheUtilityPrincipleasaLimit onPunishment

JeremyBentham,TheTheoryof Legislation

2.Deterrence

JeremyBentham,TheTheoryof Legislation

JamesQ.Wilson,ThinkingAbout Crime

AnthonyN.Doob& Cheryl MarieWebster,SentenceSeverity and Crime: AcceptingtheNull Hypothesis

LouisSeidman,Soldiers,Martyrs,andCriminal Law: Utilitarianism andtheProblem of CrimeControl

RandolphRoth,AmericanHomicide

NotesandQuestions

3.Rehabilitation

DavidRothman,TheDiscoveryof theAsylum

EdwardL.Rubin,TheInevitabilityof Rehabilitation

FrancisA.Allen,Criminal Justice,Legal Values,andthe RehabilitativeIdeal

Elliot Currie,ConfrontingCrime: AnAmericanChallenge

Michael Tonry,MalignNeglect: Race,Crime,andPunishment in America

NotesandQuestions

4.Incapacitation

JamesQ.Wilson,ThinkingAbout Crime

AlfredBlumstein& JacquelineCohen,Characterizing Criminal Careers

FranklinE.Zimring& GordonHawkins,Incapacitation: Penal Confinement andtheRestraint of Crime

MarkusDirkDubber,Recidivist StatutesasaRational Punishment

NotesandQuestions

D.Retribution

1.RetributionasaLimit onPunishment

H.J.McCloskey,ANon-UtilitarianApproachtoPunishment

JohnRawls,TwoConceptsof Rules

GuyoraBinder & NicholasJ.Smith,Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of theInnocent

Herbert Packer,TheLimitsof theCriminal Sanction

AlanH.Goldman,TheParadoxof Punishment

DavidDolinko,ThreeMistakesof Retributivism

Michael L.Corrado,TheAbolitionof Punishment

Kansas v. Hendricks

NotesandQuestions

2.RetributionasanAffirmativeJustificationfor Punishment

a.TheAppeal toIntuition

Michael Moore,LawandPsychiatry

NotesandQuestions

b.TheArgument from Social Contract

Herbert Morris,OnGuilt andInnocence

JeffrieMurphy,Marxism andRetribution

NotesandQuestions

c.TheExpressiveArgument

Joel Feinberg,DoingandDeserving

JeanHampton,Punishment asDefeat

NotesandQuestions

E.BeyondUtilityandDesert: EducativeTheoriesof Punishment

Herbert Morris,APaternalisticTheoryof Punishment

R.A.Duff,TrialsandPunishments

JohnBraithwaite,Crime,Shame,andReintegration

NotesandQuestions

F.Proportionality

Graham v. Florida

NotesandQuestions

Kennedy v. Louisiana

NotesandQuestions

Ewing v. California

NotesandQuestions

Miller v. Alabama

NotesandQuestions

G.ModernGuidelinesSentencing

KevinReitz,Sentencing: Guidelines

1.DueProcess,theJury,andSentencingDesigns

Apprendi v. New Jersey

NotesandQuestions

2.The Blakely-Booker RevolutioninSentencing NotesandQuestions

THECRIMINALACT

A.TheNeedfor anActusReus

Proctor v. State

NotesandQuestions

B.Omissions

Jones v. United States

NotesandQuestions

C.Possession

United States v. Maldonado

NotesandQuestions

State v. Barger

NotesandQuestions

D.TheRequirement of Harm

Lawrence v. Texas

NotesandQuestions

E.TheRequirement of Voluntariness

People v. Newton

NotesandQuestions

Martin v. State

NotesandQuestions

People v. Grant

NotesandQuestions

F.TheProhibitionof “Status”Crimes

Robinson v. California

NotesandQuestions

Johnson v. State

NotesandQuestions

G.Legality

Keeler v. Superior Court

NotesandQuestions

United States v. Hudson and Goodwin

NotesandQuestions

Rogers v. Tennessee

NotesandQuestions

H.Specificity

Chicago v. Morales

NotesandQuestions

3

THEGUILTYMIND

A.TheRequirement of aGuiltyMind

People v. Dillard

NotesandQuestions

United States v. Wulff

NotesandQuestions

Lambert v. California

NotesandQuestions

B.Categoriesof Culpability

Regina v. Faulkner

NotesandQuestions

Model Penal Code§§1.13and2.02

NotesandQuestions

C.MistakeandMensReaDefault Rules

Regina v. Prince

NotesandQuestions

People v. Ryan

NotesandQuestions

Elonis v. United States

NotesandQuestions

D.“Mistakeof Law”

1.IntroductiontoMistakeof Law

2.Mistakeof LawandMensRea

People v. Bray

NotesandQuestions

United States v. Baker

NotesandQuestions

Cheek v. United States

NotesandQuestions

3.Mistakeof LawasanExcuse

Commonwealth v. Twitchell

NotesandQuestions

E.Capacityfor MensRea

Hendershott v. People

NotesandQuestions

State v. Cameron

NotesandQuestions

Montana v. Egelhoff

NotesandQuestions

4 CAUSATION

A.“But-For”Causation

Regina v. Martin Dyos

NotesandQuestions

R. v. Benge

NotesandQuestions

B.Violent Acts

Hubbard v. Commonwealth

NotesandQuestions

C.ProximateCause: ForeseeabilityandRelatedLimitations

Commonwealth v. Rhoades

NotesandQuestions

D.InterveningCauses

Commonwealth v. Root

NotesandQuestions

United States v. Hamilton

NotesandQuestions

Stephenson v. State

NotesandQuestions

People v. Kevorkian

NotesandQuestions

E.CausationbyOmission: Duties

Commonwealth v. Levesque

NotesandQuestions

III HOMICIDEOFFENSES

Kan.Stat.Ann.§§21-5402through21-5406

Ala.Code§§13A-6-2through13A-6-4

Cal.Penal Code§§187through189,191.5through192

Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann.,Tit.18,§§2502through2504

IllinoisCompiledStatutesAnn.720ILCS5/9-1through720 ILCS 5/9-2.1

MinnesotaStatutesAnn.609.185

Model Penal Code§§210.2through210.4

NewYorkPenal Code§§125.10,125.12,125.15,125.20,125.25, 125.27

5 INTENTIONALHOMICIDE

A.Intentional Murder (SecondDegree)

Francis v. Franklin

NotesandQuestions

B.PremeditatedMurder (First Degree)

United States v. Watson

NotesandQuestions

C.VoluntaryManslaughter

1.TheTheoryof Mitigation

People v. Walker

NotesandQuestions

2.“CoolingTime”

Ex Parte Fraley

NotesandQuestions

3.Adulteryas“AdequateProvocation”

Rowland v. State

NotesandQuestions

4.ProvocationUnder Reform Rules

People v. Berry

NotesandQuestions

5.Cultural NormsandtheReasonablePerson

People v. Wu

NotesandQuestions

UNINTENTIONALHOMICIDE

A.InvoluntaryManslaughter

1.Negligent andRecklessHomicide

Commonwealth v. Welansky

NotesandQuestions

2.InvoluntaryManslaughter inContemporarySettings

State v. Williams

NotesandQuestions

B.RecklessMurder

Mayes v. The People

NotesandQuestions

C.HomicideintheCourseof Another Crime

1.FelonyMurder: AnIntroduction

State v. Martin

NotesandQuestions

2.Causal Limitations

People v. Washington

NotesandQuestions

People v. Hickman

NotesandQuestions

People v. Gladman

NotesandQuestions

People v. Cavitt

NotesandQuestions

3.DangerousFelonyLimitations

4.TheIndependent FeloniousPurposeLimitation

State v. Shock

NotesandQuestions

5.TwoVariantsof FelonyMurder

a.Misdemeanor Manslaughter

b.Death-AggravatedFelonies

7

CAPITALMURDERANDTHEDEATHPENALTY

A.AHistorical andConstitutional Summary

B.TheNewCapital Statutes

1.TheStructureof “GuidedDiscretion”: AnExemplaryCase

Olsen v. State

NotesandQuestions

2.MitigatingCircumstances

3.WeighingtheCircumstances

C.Categorical LimitsontheDeathPenalty

1.TheMensReaLimit: ARepriseonFelonyMurder

Tison v. Arizona

NotesandQuestions

2.Victim/RaceDiscriminationandtheEighthAmendment

McCleskey v. Kemp

NotesandQuestions

IV

JUSTIFICATIONANDEXCUSE

A.DistinguishingJustificationandExcuse

B.Justification,Excuse,andthePurposesof Punishment

C.CombiningJustificationandExcuse

DEFENSIVEFORCE,NECESSITY,ANDDURESS

A.DefensiveForce

1.ElementsandRationales

People v. La Voie

NotesandQuestions

People v. Gleghorn

NotesandQuestions

2.TheReasonableSelf-Defender: TheCaseof the BatteredSpouse

State v. Leidholm

NotesandQuestions

3.RepriseontheReasonableSelf-Defender

People v. Goetz

NotesandQuestions

4.DefensiveForceandLawEnforcement

Tennessee v. Garner

NotesandQuestions

People v. Ceballos

NotesandQuestions

B.Choiceof Evils—Necessity

1.TheMoral Issue

The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens

NotesandQuestions

2.Escapefrom IntolerablePrisonConditions

People v. Unger

NotesandQuestions

3.“Political”Necessity

State v. Warshow

NotesandQuestions

C.Duress

State v. Crawford

NotesandQuestions

State v. Hunter

NotesandQuestions

MENTALILLNESSASADEFENSE

A.Introduction

B.The M’Naghten RuleandCognition

People v. Serravo

NotesandQuestions

C.CognitionandVolition: TheRoadfrom M’Naghten andBack

Smith v. State

NotesandQuestions

D.Reprise: ReassessingtheInsanityDefense

E.“Quasi-Insanity”Defenses

1.Alcohol andOther Drugs

2.Post-TraumaticStressDisorder

3.Postpartum Psychosis

4.“MultiplePersonality”Disorder

5.TheAntisocial Personality

10 ATTEMPT

A.ThePunishment for Attempt

1.WhyPunishAttempt?

2.TheEmergenceof Attempt Liability

GeorgeFletcher,RethinkingCriminal Law

3.TheGradingof Attempt

Model Penal Code§5.05

B.TheMensReafor Attempt

State v. Lyerla

NotesandQuestions

People v. Bland

NotesandQuestions

C.TheActusReusof Attempt

1.Preparationvs.Attempt

People v. Murray

NotesandQuestions

McQuirter v. State

NotesandQuestions

People v. Rizzo

NotesandQuestions

2.Abandonment

People v. Staples

NotesandQuestions

3.Solicitation

People v. Lubow

NotesandQuestions

D.Impossibility

Booth v. State

NotesandQuestions

People v. Dlugash

NotesandQuestions

People v. Thousand

NotesandQuestions

11

COMPLICITY

A.TheAccessorial Act

State v. Ochoa

NotesandQuestions

State v. Tally

NotesandQuestions

State v. Formella

NotesandQuestions

B.MensReaof Complicity

1.Intent toAidor Encourage

People v. Beeman

NotesandQuestions

2.TheMental Element of theOffense

Wilson v. People

NotesandQuestions

3.CombinedStandardsandUnintendedHarm

State v. Etzweiler

NotesandQuestions

4.Culpabilityfor SecondaryCrimes

Rosemond v. United States

NotesandQuestions

People v. Kessler

NotesandQuestions

C.Relationsof Parties

1.ThePerpetrator IsExcused

2.ThePerpetrator IsJustified

3.ThePerpetrator LacksMensRea

4.Discrepant MensRea

5.Oneof thePartiesLacksaRequiredStatusfor theCrime

D.Criminal Liabilityof Corporations

1.Respondeat Superior andthePremisesof CorporateLiability

State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc

NotesandQuestions

United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

NotesandQuestions

2.TheMPCandthe“CorporateMind”

NotesandQuestions

12

CONSPIRACY

A.TheNatureof Conspiracy

State v. Verive

NotesandQuestions

B.TheAgreement

1.Proof of Formation

Griffin v. State

NotesandQuestions

2.Terminationof theAgreement

United States v. Recio

NotesandQuestions

C.TheMensReaof Conspiracy

People v. Lauria

NotesandQuestions

D.Special MensReaProblemsof Conspiracy

E.TheIncidentsof Conspiracy

United States v. Diaz

NotesandQuestions

F.ThePartiestoandObjectsof Conspiracy

1.Bilateral andUnilateral Conspiracies

2.TheScopeof theConspiracy

a.Singlevs.MultipleConspiracies

b.Chains,Wheels,Etc.

United States v. Caldwell

NotesandQuestions

G.TheRICOStatuteandtheFrontier of Conspiracy

1.TheStatute

2.Elementsof Racketeering

3.RICOConspiracies

United States v. Neapolitan

NotesandQuestions

ADDITIONALOFFENSES

13 RAPE

A.Introduction

1.DefiningRape

2.SomeFactsAbout RapeintheUnitedStates

3.TheEvolutionof RapeRules

B.TheRequirement of “Utmost Resistance”

Brown v. State

NotesandQuestions

C.“Reasonable”or “Earnest”Resistance

People v. Dorsey

NotesandQuestions

D.Force

People v. Barnes

NotesandQuestions

E.Nonconsent

State v. Smith

NotesandQuestions

F.Lackof AffirmativeExpressionof Consent

In the Interest of M.T.S.

NotesandQuestions

G.IncapacitytoConsent

State v. Moorman

NotesandQuestions

H.RapebyExtortion

Commonwealth v. Mlinarich

NotesandQuestions

I.RapebyFraud

Boro v. People

NotesandQuestions

J.MensRea

Commonwealth v. Fischer

NotesandQuestions

K.EvidentiaryReforms

14 THEFTOFFENSES

A.Theft

1.TheMeaningof Theft

Commonwealth v. Mitchneck

NotesandQuestions

2.TheDevelopment of Theft Offenses

The Case of the Carrier Who Broke Bulk Anon v. the Sheriff of London

Rex v. Chisser

The King v. Pear

NotesandQuestions

B.Fraud

1.FalsePretenses

People v. Sattlekau

NotesandQuestions

2.SchemetoDefraudinFederal Law

Durland v. United States

NotesandQuestions

3.BankFraud

United States v. Phillips

NotesandQuestions

C.Extortion

People v. Dioguardi

NotesandQuestions

McCormick v. United States

NotesandQuestions

D.Robbery

Lear v. State

NotesandQuestions

E.Burglary

State v. Colvin

NotesandQuestions

15

PERJURY,FALSESTATEMENTS,ANDOBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

A.Perjury

Bronston v. United States

NotesandQuestions

Stuart Green,Lying,Misleading,andFalselyDenying: How Moral

ConceptsInform theLawof Perjury,Fraud,andFalse Statements

NotesandQuestions

B.FalseStatements

United States v. Moore

NotesandQuestions

Brogan v. United States

NotesandQuestions

C.Obstructionof Justice

1.TheOmnibusProvision—§1503

United States v. Aguilar

NotesandQuestions

United States v. Cueto

NotesandQuestions

2.Section1512andthe Arthur Andersen Case

Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States

NotesandQuestions

AppendixA ANOTEONTHEMODELPENALCODE

McClainandDanKahan,Criminal LawReform: Historical Development intheUnitedStates

AppendixB

THEMODELPENALCODE

Table of Cases

Table of Model Penal Code Sections

Index

PREFACE

As is the tradition for this book, as it moves into its fourth decade, Criminal Law: Cases and Materials aims tointroducestudents tothebasic purposes, concepts, doctrines, and analytic techniques of the substantive criminal law.Our foundational premiseisthat thesubstantivecriminal law is a statutory as well as a “common law” subject. While the substantive criminal law, like other basic lawcourses, introduces students to the art of common law reasoning, this book not only teaches lawyers-to-be to construe and apply express legislative rules of liability but also to understand the fundamental concepts that are just as often presupposed in criminal codes. We expose students to alternative statutory formulations of offenses and defenses and enable students to become familiar with the influential Model Penal Code. This book emphasizes the crucial skills of element analysis, and illuminates the considerations of social policy and moral principle that inform the interpretation, application, and evaluation of criminal statutes.

Of course, this book participates in the classic pedagogic tradition of relyingonappellatedecisionsinactual casestoexplicatethedoctrinesand policy dilemmas of the criminal law. The book’s introduction explains just how these cases arise, what kinds of substantive criminal law issues come up on appeal, what sources of law appellate courts bring to bear on these issues, and what methods of reasoning and argument the courts use to resolve them. We continue to include some of the most venerable of the illustrative cases, but we also add very recent cases that capture newer developmentsinthisconstantlychangingfieldof law.

Since its inception, however, this book has always been more than a collection of cases. It continues to interweave judicial opinions with statutory material, sociological accounts of crime, historical accounts of the development of the criminal law, and philosophical arguments about criminal justice. Thus, we continue our commitment to place the substantive criminal law in a realistic social setting in which inequality— whether basedonrace,gender,or poverty—playsanundeniablerole.

But our commitment is also to pedagogical clarity, so we include throughout the book introductory and transitional material that provides straightforward explanations of the alternative rules applied in each doctrinal area. The notes that follow principal cases are organized and labeled by legal issue so that students’ thinking can be focused on the most pressing questions raised by the cases. And at key points in the text, we interweave problems and exercises to help students master the analytic skillsemphasizedthroughout thebook.

Chapter 1, on the purposes and limits of punishment, continues to focus on the policy controversy over historically high incarceration rates, along with the causes and implications of fluctuating crime rates. It includesacomprehensivetreatment of EighthAmendment proportionality, nowenrichedbythe important newSupreme Court cases onthe legalityof life-without-possibility-of-parole sentences for juveniles. As in the previous edition, we place our discussion of proportionality limits on death sentences in this chapter (with references back to it when we turn directly to capital murder in Chapter 7) so as to provide a unified picture of thethemesof proportionality.

Chapter 2, “The Criminal Act,” continues its coverage of voluntary acts, possession, harm, omissions, status crimes, prospectivity, legality, and specificity. In addition to our very contemporary treatment of possessiondoctrine appliedtocomputer files,we enhance the relevance of this material with an important newcase on void-for-vagueness attacks on statutes governing the homeless, as well as a deeper historical account of overbreadth.

Chapter 3, “The Guilty Mind,” continues to explore the question of whether and when criminal liability depends on culpability. It distinguishes different culpable mental states and trains students to construct the mental elements of statutory offenses. Finally, it examines the special problems of mistake of lawandcapacityfor mens rea.Wehave added the striking new case of State v. Adkins on Florida's controversial strict liability drug laws, as well as the important new Supreme Court Elonis caseondefault mensrea.

Chapter 4, on causation, continues to pose the problem of why and how we assign causal responsibility for harmful results. It also analyzes the doctrinal structure of causation by exploring the nuances of causationin-fact,proximatecausation,direct causation,andcausationbyomission.

Chapter 5, “Intentional Homicide,” continues to illustrate the concepts of intent and premeditation. It explores the moral dilemmas posed by the problem of whether and how emotional distress can mitigate murder liability in a society riven by controversies over cultural diversity andgender inequality.Inparticular,weaddnewcommentaryexploringthe so-called“gaypanicdefense”and“transpanicdefense.”

Chapter 6, “Unintentional Homicide,” distinguishes involuntary manslaughter, extreme indifference murder, and felony murder. The section on felony murder is informed by research on the historical and normative underpinnings of felony murder liability, reported in Guyora Binder’s new book Felony Murder (2012). In addition, we now break out theiconicPeoplev.Washingtoncaseasafull principal case,soastobetter framethevariouskiller-victim permutationsthat complicatethisarea.

The newly streamlined Chapter 7, on capital murder, now narrows its focus to the operation of capital murder statutes as sentencing schemes requiring a structured assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors. While the last few years have not produced striking new changes, we include an eloquent dissent by Justice Breyer that offers a searing critical reassessment of thestateof Americandeathpenaltylawandpractice.

Chapter 8, on necessary force, lesser evils, and duress, adds a new note on so-called “Stand Your Ground” laws, as well as a the dramatic Erdemovic caseinvolvingduressandmilitaryorders.

Chapter 9, on insanity, continues its enhanced focus on the newer cognitive tests.It adds newmaterial onthe state of the lawinregardtothe various relationships between insanity and intoxication, and on multiple personalitydisorder.

Chapter 10, “Attempt,” adds new commentary on the the doctrine of reckless endangerment, as well the California case of People v. Bland, which comprehensively but efficiently captures the forms of “transferred intent”for inchoatecrimes.

Chapter 11, “Complicity,” continues its approach of separately examining the actus reus and mens rea of complicity. It adds as a new principal case the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rosemond v. United States on accomplice liability for secondary crimes. This chapter includes abrief treatment of thecriminal liabilityof corporations.

Chapter 12, “Conspiracy,” adds to the original closing section on the federal racketeering enterprise (RICO) law an up-to-date treatment of the

very aggressive “street gang enhancement” laws that are modeled on RICOprinciples.

Chapter 13, “Rape,” continues to take account of law reform efforts and scholarly research in this rapidly changing field of law; it also continues to offer a comparison and precise element analysis of the broad range of alternative definitions of sexual assault offenses. It now includes the recent history of efforts by the American Law Institute to revise the verydatedModel Penal Coderuleonrapeandmovetowardanaffirmative consent standard

Chapter 14, “Theft Offenses,” continues to include lively case law on theft-based white collar crimes, including mail fraud and bribery. Its treatment of white collar crime and fraud now includes a provocative set of opinions by Judges Posner and Easterbrook in a bank fraud case that occursinthewakeof themortgagecrisisof 2008.

Chapter 15, “Perjury, False Statements, and Obstruction of Justice,” continues to focus on federal criminal law. In recent decades, federal prosecutors have increasingly and controversially used their investigatory powers to incriminate suspects in these collateral crimes. This practice poses some of the same fundamental questions about law enforcement discretion raised by the vagrancy, possession, attempt, and conspiracy offenses explored in earlier chapters. We have added several new perjury and obstruction cases, including the very controversial prosecution of baseball star BarryBonds.

The point at which government takes a person’s life or liberty and justifies it by denouncing that person’s actions, purposes, and character is the law’s most powerful manifestation. The criminal law therefore poses the most important challenge to our responsibility as citizens to understand, to evaluate, and to improve the law that is enforced in our name.Wehopethisnewbookhelpsour studentsmeet that challenge.

September 2016

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

For their excellent research assistance, we thank Michael Court, Daniel Corbett, Samuel Dolinger, Mark Myott, Charles Proctor, and Michael Stewart.

The editors also would like to acknowledge the permission of the authors, publishers, and copyright holders of the following publications for permissiontoreproduceexcerptsherein:

AmericanLawInstitute,Model Penal Code& Commentaries.Copyright © 1980AmericanLawInstitute.Reprintedbypermission.

Assault Victim Dies After Feeding Tube Withheld by Court, New York Times, June 15, 1997, sec. 6 at 28. Copyright © 1997 Associated Press. Reprintedbypermission.

Braithwaite, John, Crime, Shame, and Reintegration, 62, 101-02 (1989). Copyright © 1989 Cambridge University Press. Reprinted by permission.

Braithwaite, John. & Philip Pettit, Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice 2-5 (1990). Copyright © 1990 Oxford University Press.Reprintedbypermission.

Brown, Richard Maxwell, No Duty to Retreat: Violence and Values in American History and Society 4-30. Copyright © 1991 Oxford UniversityPress.Reprintedbypermission.

Campane, Jerome, Chains, Wheels, and the Single Conspiracy, 50 FBI L. Enforcement Bull. 24, 26-31 (Aug. 1981), 24-30 (Sept 1981). Copyright ©1981FBI LawEnforcement Bulletin.Reprintedbypermission.

Coleman, Cheryl, “Guilty but Mentally Ill” Verdict Needed? YES, New YorkLawJournal,September 23,1999,p.2.Reprintedbypermission.

Death Penalty Information Center, “Executions Since 1976.” Copyright © 2016DeathPenaltyInformationCenter.Reprintedbypermission. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition 309.81.Copyright ©2013,AmericanPsychiatricAssociation.Reprinted withpermission.

Dix, George E., Justification: Self-Defense, 3 Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice 948-949 (Joshua Dressler, ed., 2d ed., 2001). Copyright © 2001

Gale,apart of CengageLearning,Inc.Reprintedbypermission.

Doob, Anthony & Cheryl Marie Webster, Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting The Null Hypothesis, 30 Crime & Just. 143, 181-89 (2003). Copyright © 2003 University of Chicago Press. Reprinted by permission.

Dripps,Donald,Criminal JusticeProcess: 1EncyclopediaCriminal Justice 362, 364-69 (Joshua Dressler, ed., 2d ed., 2001). Copyright © 2001

Gale,apart of CengageLearning,Inc.Reprintedbypermission.

Duff, R. A., Trials and Punishments 15, 20-21, 246-47, 254-57, 259-62 (1986). Copyright © 1986 Cambridge University Press. Reprinted by permission.

Fletcher, George, Rethinking Criminal Law 3-9, 118-119, 132, 134-135, 166-167, 396-401, 524-529, 532-35, 575-578, 613-614, 619-620, 705. Copyright ©2000OxfordUniversityPress.Reprintedbypermission.

Goldstein, Abraham, Excuse: Insanity, 2 Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice 736-740(Joshua Deressler,ed.,2001).Copyright ©2001Gale,a part of CengageLearning,Inc.Reprintedbypermission.

Green, Stuart, Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: How Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements, 53 Hastings L. J. 157, 201-211. Copyright © 2001 UC Hastings College of Law.Reprintedbypermission.

Haines, Roger, Frank Bowman & Jennifer Woll, Federal Sentencing Guidelines Handbook 18-20, Thomson West. Copyright © 2002 ThomsonReuters.Reprintedbypermission.

Hart, H. L. A. & Anthony M. Honore, Causation in the Law 341-342 (1985). Copyright © 1985 Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission.

Krueger,Chris,ProsecutorsAccept Soldier’sInsanityDefenseinStabbing, St. Petersburg Times, January 13, 2011, at 1A. Copyright ©2011 Times PublishingCompany.Reprintedbypermission.

Kutz, Christopher, Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age 113, 116-124, 138 (2000). Copyright © 2000 Cambridge University Press. Reprintedbypermission.

Man Admits Selling Gun Used in US School Massacre, Reuters, August 18, 1999. Copyright © 1999 Reuters News Agency. Reprinted by

permission.

Mercy Killer Gets Probation, San Francisco Chronicle, June 20, 1984. Copyright ©1984Hearst Corporation.Reprintedbypermission.

NoCharges for Prof inBaby’s Hot Death,UPI,July27,1999.Copyright © 1999UnitedPressInternational.Reprintedbypermission.

Nordren,Sarah,WomanDiesSevenYearsafter HusbandShot Her,Buffalo News, January 30, 1994, at A10. Copyright © 1994 Associated Press. Reprintedbypermission.

Oberman, Michelle, Turning Girls Into Women: Re-evaluating Modern Statutory Rape Law, 85 Am. J. Crim. L. & Criminology 15, 24-26, 3233, 37 (1994). Copyright © 1994 American Journal of Criminal Law. Reprintedbypermission.

Packer, Herbert, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction 14, 73-77 (1968). Copyright ©1968StanfordUniversityPress.Reprintedbypermission.

Reitz,Kevin,Sentencing: Guidelines,4Encyclopediaof CrimeandJustice 1429-1440 (Joshua Dressler, ed., 2d ed., 2002). Copyright © 2002 Gale, apart of CengageLearning,Inc.Reprintedbypermission.

Roth, Randolph, American Homicide 9, 14-15, 17-18, 20 (2009).

Copyright © 2009 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Reprinted by permission of The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Rothman, David, The Discovery of the Asylum 79-89, 104-107 (1990).

Copyright ©1971,1990DavidJ.Rothman.Reprintedbypermission.

Rubin, Edward, The Inevitability of Rehabilitation, 19 Law & Ineq. 343 (2001). Reprinted by permission of Law and Inequality: A Journal of TheoryandPractice.

San Jose Mercury News, Oct. 15, 1990, at 6B. Copyright © 1990 AssociatedPress.Reprintedbypermission.

Simons, Kenneth, When Is Strict Liability Just? 87 Crim. L. & Criminology, 1075, 1085-88, 1121-1124 (1997). Copyright © 1997 KennethSimons.Reprintedbypermission.

The Sentencing Project, Washington D.C., Facts About Prisons and Prisoners 7 (December 2007). Copyright © 2007 The Sentencing Project.Reprintedbypermission.

Wilson, James Q., Thinking About Crime 145-158, originally printed in The Public Interest, No. 72 (Summer 1983). Copyright © 1983 National Affairs,Inc.Reprintedbypermission.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.