OrgiesofWords:MysteryTerminologyinthe "ParaphraseofSt.John’sGospel"byNonnusof PanopolisDoroszewski
https://ebookmass.com/product/orgies-of-words-mysteryterminology-in-the-paraphrase-of-st-johns-gospel-by-nonnusof-panopolis-doroszewski/
Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) ready for you
Download now and discover formats that fit your needs...
The material logic of John St. Thomas : basic treatises John Of St. Thomas
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-material-logic-of-john-st-thomasbasic-treatises-john-of-st-thomas/
ebookmass.com
The Testament of Lazarus: The Pre-Christian Gospel of John Janet Tyson
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-testament-of-lazarus-the-prechristian-gospel-of-john-janet-tyson/
ebookmass.com
The collected works of St. John of the Cross Kavanaugh
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-collected-works-of-st-john-of-thecross-kavanaugh/ ebookmass.com
Meteorology Today: An Introduction to Weather, Climate and the Environment (Twelfth Edition) C. Donald Ahrens
https://ebookmass.com/product/meteorology-today-an-introduction-toweather-climate-and-the-environment-twelfth-edition-c-donald-ahrens/ ebookmass.com
Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice 3rd Edition, (Ebook PDF)
https://ebookmass.com/product/student-development-in-college-theoryresearch-and-practice-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
ebookmass.com
The Oxford Handbook of the Bible and Ecology (Oxford Handbooks) Hilary Marlow (Editor)
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-the-bible-andecology-oxford-handbooks-hilary-marlow-editor/
ebookmass.com
The LSTA's Complete Credit Agreement Guide, Second Edition Michael Bellucci
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-lstas-complete-credit-agreementguide-second-edition-michael-bellucci/
ebookmass.com
5 Steps to a 5: AP Chemistry 2023 Elite Student Edition
John Moore
https://ebookmass.com/product/5-steps-to-a-5-ap-chemistry-2023-elitestudent-edition-john-moore/
ebookmass.com
Highland Gladiator Kathryn Le Veque
https://ebookmass.com/product/highland-gladiator-kathryn-le-veque-4/
ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/crucial-influence-leadership-skills-tocreate-lasting-behavior-change-3rd-edition-joseph-grenny/
ebookmass.com
FilipDoroszewski OrgiesofWords
Arbeitenzur Kirchengeschichte
Foundedby KarlHoll † andHansLietzmann †
Editedby
ChristianAlbrecht,ChristophMarkschies andChristopherOcker
Volume154
FilipDoroszewski OrgiesofWords
MysteryTerminologyinthe “ParaphraseofSt.John’sGospel” byNonnusofPanopolis
TranslatedfromPolishbyDamianJasiński
Thistranslationhasbeenco-fundedbytheFoundationforPolishScience
ISBN978-3-11-079085-6
e-ISBN(PDF)978-3-11-079090-0
e-ISBN(EPUB)978-3-11-079097-9
ISSN1861-5996
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2022935336
BibliographicinformationpublishedbytheDeutscheNationalbibliothek
TheDeutscheNationalbibliothekliststhispublicationintheDeutscheNationalbibliografie; detailedbibliographicdataareavailableontheInternetathttp://dnb.dnb.de.
©2022WalterdeGruyterGmbH,Berlin/Boston
TranslatedfromthePolishOriginalTitle Orgiesłów.TerminologiamisteriówwParafrazie Ewangeliiwg św.JanaNonnosazPanopolis. MonographsoftheFoundationforPolishScience ©2016WydawnictwoNaukoweUniwersytetuMikołajaKopernika,Toruń
Typesetting:IntegraSoftwareServicesPvt.Ltd.
Printingandbinding:CPIbooksGmbH,Leck
www.degruyter.com
InmemoryofHenrykWójtowicz (1928‒2012)
Acknowledgements
Thisbookwouldnothaveassumeditspresentshapehaditnotbeenforthehelp ofPaweł Janiszewski,whomIwouldliketothankforhisunflaggingsupportat variousstagesofmyworkonthetext.IwouldalsoliketothankJanKozłowski, whounfailinglyprovidedmewithencouragementtocontinuemyresearch;our innumerablediscussionshaveespeciallycontributedtobringingtheobjectof thisstudyintosharpfocus.Ialsowishtoextendmygratitudetotheanonymous reviewersappointedbytheFoundationforPolishSciencefortheirinsightfulcriticism.Iwouldalsoliketothankmywife,JuliaDoroszewska,forherdailysupport,withoutwhichnocreativeworkispossible.
Finally,IwouldliketothanktheHardtFoundationinVandoeuvres,Switzerland(www.fondationhardt.ch),forthebursaryandmostpleasurablehospitalitythathelpedmeworkonthisbook.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110790900-202
AcknowledgementsVII
ForewordXIII
ForewordtotheEnglishtranslationXVII
AbbreviationsXIX
Part1: Introduction
1.1Ancientmysteries3
1.2Mysteryterminology11
1.3NonnusofPanopolis31
1.4Thescopeofinquiry39
1.5Mysteryterminologyinthe Paraphrase 45
1.5.1 ἀβάκχευτος 45
1.5.2 βακχεύω 46
1.5.3 θιασώδης 47
1.5.4 μύστης 48
1.5.5 μυστιπολεύω 49
1.5.6 μυστιπόλος 49
1.5.7 μύστις 50
1.5.8 ὄργια 52
1.5.9 τελετή 54
1.5.10Conclusion 56
Part2: JesusandDionysus
2.1TheweddingatCanaofGalilee59
2.1.1Preliminaryremarks 59
2.1.2Analysisof Par.2.12–20(=John2:3) 61
2.1.2.1Adimmedjoy 61
2.1.2.2AweddingwithoutDionysus 62
2.1.2.3Incompleteintoxication 67
2.1.2.4Bacchiccries.Ananalysisof Par. 2.35–38 73
2.1.3Finalremarks 75
2.1.3.1Thewinegivers.Parallelsbetween Par. 2.1–60andthe Dionysiaca 75
2.1.3.2TheAlexandriantradition 78
2.2Thefailedarrestattempt81
2.2.1Preliminaryremarks 81
2.2.2TheBacchiccrowd.Ananalysisof Par.7.172–182 (=John7:45–49) 83
2.2.3 Par. 7.172–182andEuripides’ Bacchae 85
2.2.4Finalremarks 88
2.3Jesus’ HighPriestlyPrayer91
2.3.1Preliminaryremarks 91
2.3.2Analysisof Par.17.88–92(=John17:25–26a) 91
2.3.2.1Orgiesofwords 91
2.3.2.2ADionysiacchorus. Par. 17.88–92versus Protrepticus 12.119.1 94
2.3.2.3Orgiesofwordsin Par. 16.111 96
2.3.3Finalremarks 98
Part3: Mysteriumandmysteries
3.1ThethreePassoverfeasts103
3.1.1Preliminaryremarks 103
3.1.2ThefirstPassover.Analysisof Par. 2.70–72,110–115 and Par. 4.204–205 104
3.1.2.1AJewishPassover? Par.2.70–72(=John2:13) 104
3.1.2.2Thenoise-lovingorgies. Par.2.110–115(=John2:23) 109
3.1.2.3ABacchicprocession. Par. 4.204–205(=ἐντῇἑορτῇ,John 4:45) 120
3.1.3ThesecondPassover.Ananalysisof Par. 6.9–10 (=John6:4) 123
3.1.3.1Anorgy-lovingfeast 123
3.1.4ThethirdPassover.Ananalysisof Par. 11.222–227 and12.1–6 124
3.1.4.1ThewidelyknownPassover. Par.11.222–227 (=John11:55) 124
3.1.4.2ThemysteryofthePassover. Par.12.1–6(=John12:1) 126
3.1.5Finalremarks 128
3.2JesusandtheSamaritanwoman131
3.2.1Preliminaryremarks 131
3.2.2Ananalysisof Par.4.88–121(=John4:19–24) 131
3.2.2.1Offeringsacrifice 131
3.2.2.2TheSamaritans,theJewsandthetrulyinitiated 135
3.2.3Finalremarks 142
3.3TheFeastoftheTabernacles145
3.3.1Preliminaryremarks 145
3.3.2Sacredinitiation.Ananalysisof Par.7.31–34 145
3.3.3Finalremarks 154
Part4: Conclusions
4.1Theroleofmysteryterminologyinthe Paraphrase 157
4.1.1Betweenpoetryandexegesis 157
4.1.2Mysteryterminologyintheexegesisofthe Paraphrase 158
4.1.2.1Dionysiac,orChristian,spirit 158
4.1.2.2MysteriumChristi 160
4.1.2.3JewishfeastsasBacchicmysteries 162
4.1.3Summary 163
Bibliography165
Indexgraecitatis181
Indexlocorum185
Indexnominum197
Foreword
NonnusofPanopolis,aGreekpoetfromlateantiqueEgyptwhoprobablylived andworkedinthecosmopolitancityofAlexandriainthefifthcenturyAD,isa mysteriousfigure.Consideringthelackofbiographicaldetails,scholarshave focusedtheirresearchonNonnus’ poeticoutput,whichisamuchmoregratifyingfieldofstudythanhisbiography(whichremainsdifficulttoreconstruct). Thepoet’slegacyiscomposedoftwoworksonly,butbothmayproveveryinterestingtocontemporaryreadersforanumberofreasons.Thefirstpoem,the Dionysiaca,isthelongestofallancientepicstohavesurvivedtothisday.Asits titlemakesevident,NonnusdedicatedittoDionysus,theGreekgodofwine, mysteriesandritualecstasy.Writteninforty-eightbooksandonlyslightly shorterthanthe Iliad andthe Odyssey puttogether,the Dionysiaca formsacolourfulmosaicofstyles,literaryreferencesand,oftenconsiderablymodified, mythologicalmotifs.Itisworthmentioningthat,asacloserreadingreveals,the numerousscenesofthepoemreferdirectlytomodelsderivedfromChristianliterature.Inthisway,whatatfirstglancemightseemtobeacompaniontothe classicalDionysiacmythologyprovestobeamuchmorecomplexwork,onethat escapeseasycategorisation.
Theotherpoem,the ParaphraseoftheGospelofSaintJohn,isanepicrenderingofthedeedsofJesusChristdescribedintheFourthGospel.Thesimple,meditativelanguageofJohngiveswaytoheroichexameterrhythmandisendowed withHomericaplomb,whilethemessageoftheGospel,althoughunchanged,receivesanadditionaldimension.ThisisespeciallynoticeableinNonnus’ useof poeticimagery,ofteninformedbyGreekmythology,ambiguousterminologyand theinterpretativecluesembeddedinthepoemthatresultfromadeepunderstandingoftheBibleandthewritingsoftheChurchFathers.
Atfirstglance,thestarkdifferenceinsubjectmattermayseemtosetNonnus’ poemsapartfromeachothertothepointofcontradiction.This,together withthelackofbiographicalinformation,hasgivenrisetonumerous,often verypeculiarconjecturesregardingthePanopolitanpoet.HislivelyandintriguinglypuzzlinginterestinJesusandDionysushasprovokedscholarstoseeNonnus’ poetryinthelightofthepurportedtwistsandturnsofhislife:somehave suggestedthathehadbeenarecalcitrantpaganwhoultimatelyconvertedto Christianity,whereasothers,contrarily,presumedthathewasfirstaChristian butlaterapostatised,andstillothersheldthathehadregardedpaganand Christianbeliefsasamutuallyintertwined,syncreticwhole.Viewsontheliteraryqualityofhisepicpoemswerealsoexceedinglydisparate:theyweredecriedasdecadent,bloated,chaoticandsoporific,butalso,especiallyinrecent
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110790900-204
decades,recognisedfortheirseductivelyinnovativeandoriginalcharacteristics thatdrawthereaderintoawhirlofhighlyeruditeallusions.
ThefragmentaryandconjecturalimagethatemergesfromresearchonNonnus’ biographygaverisetoanumberoffictional,pseudo-biographicalwritings.1 Amongthem,wefindbothdeftlyfabricatedforgeriesandgenuineliteraryworks thatemergedinresponsetoquestionsthatvexedthosewhowereespeciallyfond ofNonnus’ poetry.Inthenineteenthcentury,thebiographyofNonnuscaught theattentionofahighlyskilledforger,KonstantinosSimonides.HavingcounterfeitedapapyrusthatdescribedNonnusasapaganpoetwhoreceivedbaptism anddedicatedhimselftoChristianliterature,hetriedtoexcitethecuriosityof thefirsttranslatorofNonnus’ poetryintoamodernlanguage,theFrenchCount deMarcellus.Ananalogousportrayalofthepoet’slifeisfoundintheshortstory ThePoetofPanopolis bySimonides ’ contemporary,RichardGarret.Init,the paganNonnus,unsatisfiedwiththepoorreceptionofthe Dionysiaca,decidesto convertandamazeChristianreaderswithhis Paraphrase.HealsoagreestobecomeacandidateforepiscopacyinhishometownofPanopolis,incurringthe wrathofthegodApollo,who,asapunishment,orderstherepentantpoettopublishthe Paraphrase,whichdoomshimtolingeringforperpetuityasanunsolvableenigmaintheeyesoffuturegenerations.Nonnusisalsothemaincharacter inthenovel ImGartenKlaudias bythetwentieth-centuryscholarMargarete Riemschneider.ThepoetgoesherebythenameofAmmonios,anditisonlylater thatheisnicknamedNonnus.HavingfinishedhisstudiesinAlexandria,AmmoniostravelswidelyacrosstheeasternpartsoftheRomanEmpire,whichallows himtowitnesshistoriceventsandcollaboratewithsuchimportantpersonalities ofhisdayasGregoryofNazianzusandStilicho.Towardstheendofhisturbulent life,thepoet,stillasapagan,findsrefugeintheEgyptianmonasteryofKoptos, whereovertimeheconvertstoChristianity,adoptsthenameofNonnosand writesthe Paraphrase.
ItisreadilynoticeablethatthesereconstructionsofNonnus ’ lifehave emergedfromfascinationnotonlywithhisoeuvre,butalsowiththeworldof LateAntiquity.Thathistoricalperiod,whichstartedtobethoroughlystudied onlyrelativelyrecently,waslongconsideredaperiodofthegradualdeclineof ancientcivilizationandculture,onethatlackedoriginalitywhencompared withearliercenturies.Today,however,itrevealsitselfevermoremanifestlynot asaworldofdespondentnostalgiaforthegloryoftheclassicalpast,butasone
1 ThisparagraphisbasedonHernándezdelaFuente,2018.DavidHernándezdelaFuentehimselfauthoredashortstoryonthediscoveryofthe Dionysiaca byCountdeMarcellus: LaconfesióndelCondedeMarcellus inCanoCuenca,HernándezdelaFuente,andMartínezGarcía2006, 103‒139.
thatboldlyandconsciouslydrewfrom earliertraditionsandendowedthem withnewdimensions.Itwasaworldwheretwogreattraditions,classicaland Judaeo-Christian,werebecominginextricablyintertwined,creatinganentirely newquality.Theelementsthat,onanequalfooting,constitutedthecultureof LateAntiquityincludedHomericepicsandtheBible,mythologicalfiguresand Christiansaints,DionysusandJesus.DespitethegradualChristianizationof theRomanEmpire,theclassicalheritagewascertainlynotdisparaged;onthe contrary,itwassubjecttoreinterpretationandthrivedasanintegralpartofeverydaylife.Withoutconsideringthiscontext,onecannotfullyunderstandNonnus’ poetry.
Vandoeuvres,October2015
ForewordtotheEnglishtranslation
TheoriginalversionofthisbookwaspublishedbytheFoundationforPolish Scienceintheyear2016,whenNonnianstudieswerealreadyanemergingfield inclassics.Sincethattimethefieldhasgainedevenmoreprominenceandattention,andisnowafullygrowndisciplinewithitsownconferences,volumes andanever-increasingnumberofjournalarticlesandmonographs.OutofNonnus’ twoepics,however,the Dionysiaca stillkeepsprideofplaceinscholarly literature,whilethe ParaphraseofSt.John’sGospel oftenplayssecondfiddleto thelongerpoem.Thismaypresentsomeobstaclestoafullerappreciationand understandingofbothNonnus’ legacyandthecultureofhistime.Theepictale ofJesusisnolessimportantforgaininginsightintotheimaginativeworldof thepoetandhiserathanthatofDionysus.Tofocusonlyonthelatterwould yieldapicturethatisifnotfalse,thencertainlyincomplete(ἡ
,asNonnuswouldprobablysay).Theterminologyofthemysteriesservesasaperfect example.Nonnususesitfrequentlyinbothpoems,buthedoessodifferentlyin each.Inthe Dionysiaca heusesitmostlyinthecontextofworship,andthus theterminologyistobeunderstoodinitsliteralsense.Inthe Paraphrase,on theotherhand,itisoftenusedinthebesttraditionofthemysterymetaphor, whichwasfundamentaltoancientreligious-philosophicalthought,andwhose uninterruptedcontinuitywecantracefromPlatotoPseudo-DionysiustheAreopagiteandbeyond.
GiventheaforementioneddisparityinresearchonNonnus’ poems,aswell asthecognitiveimplicationsthatresultfromit,Iampleasedthatthroughthis translationmybookwillnowbeavailabletoaninternationalaudience.Ihope thatitwillcontributeatleastalittletoincreasinginterestinthe Paraphrase,and thusalsotoadeeperunderstandingofNonnusandtheworldofLateAntiquity. TotheacknowledgementsinthePolishversionofthebookIwouldliketoadd mythankstoitstranslator,DamianJasiński,forhisgreatdiligenceandinfinite patience.IwouldalsoliketoexpressmygratitudetotheFoundationforPolish ScienceandtheFacultyofHumanitiesofCardinalStefanWyszynskiUniversity inWarsaw,whichjointlyfundedthetranslationofthebookintoEnglish.
Warsaw,May2022
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110790900-205
Abbreviations
AbbreviationsofthebooksoftheOldandNewTestamentsaccordingtothe SBLHandbookof Style. Whereverpossible,abbreviationsreferringtoancientsourcesareprovidedinaccordancewiththeconventionsadoptedinLampeandLSJ.ForthewritingsofPhiloofAlexandria, IfollowedthatofC.D.Yonge(TheWorksofPhilo.CompleteandUnabridged.NewUpdated Version,Peabody,Mass.:Hendrickson,1993).
BeekesR.Beekes, EtymologicalDictionaryofGreek,vols.1 2.Leiden,2010.
Dion. Nonnus’ Dionysiaca. IG InscriptionesGraecae. LampeG.Lampe, APatristicGreekLexicon.Oxford,1961. LXXtheSeptuagint.
LSJG.H.Liddell,R.Scott,H.S.Jones, AGreek-EnglishLexicon.WithaRevised Supplement.Oxford,1996.
Par.Nonnus’ ParaphraseoftheGospelofSt.John.
PG J.-P.Migne, Patrologiaecursuscompletus(seriesGraeca),Paris,1857 1866. TLGThesaurusLinguaeGraecae (www.tlg.uci.edu).
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110790900-206
Part1: Introduction
1.1Ancientmysteries
Theoriginsofancientmysterycults – secretreligiousceremoniesinvolvingritesof initiation – canbetracedbackatleasttothetimesofarchaicGreece.Theoldest andbestknownofthosecultswerebyfartheMysteria,takingplaceinEleusisin AtticainhonourofDemeterandherdaughterPersephone,whosenamewasgraduallyadoptedasdenotingawiderangeofvarioussecretritesperformedinthe Graeco-Romanworld.1 Amongtheoldestancientmysterycultsweknowofarethe SamothracianmysteriesoftheCabiri,themysteriesofDionysusandthemysteries ofCybele,alsoknownasMaterMagna.Theywereallcelebratedasearlyasthe beginningofthefifthcenturyBC.2 Certainly,mysterycults,whosegreatvariety largelyexceededthecultsmentionedhere,3 werepractisednotonlyinthearchaic eraandintheearliestperiodsofclassicalantiquity,butalsoduringthewholeof thedevelopmentoftheGraeco-Romanculture.Theoldestmysterycultspersisted intothelaterperiodsofclassicalantiquity,co-existingwithnewcultsthatgained popularityovertime;themostimportantofthesewerethemysteriesofIsis,attestedtoasearlyasintheearlyHellenisticperiod,andtheextremelypopularmysteriesofMithrasthatfirstappearedintheearlydecadesoftheRomanEmpire.4 It wasnotuntilLateAntiquitythatthecelebrationofallpaganmysteriescametoan endasaresultoftheprogressingChristianisationoftheRomanEmpire.
Particularlyimportanttothisstudyaretwoofthemysterycultsmentioned above.ThefirstistheEleusinianMysteries.InPlato’sdialogues,theterminology relatedtothemfeaturesmetaphoricallyasameanstopresentphilosophyasthe initiationintolivingalifeofperfection,onethathastobelivedindetachment frommundanethingsandaimedatattainingcommunionwiththedivine.Inthe wakeofthePlatonicwritings,thisterminologywaslaterusedbytheGreeks,Romans,HellenizedJewsandearlyChristiansasauniversalmeansofexpression fordiscussingmetaphysicalmatters.5 Theotherimportantcultisthemysteriesof Dionysus.Theircharacteristicterminology,too,cametobewidelyusedasametaphorfordescribingintellectualandspiritualrapturesexperiencedwhenincontactwiththeabsolute.6 NonnusconstantlyevokestheDionysiacritesinbothof
1 Burkert1987,2,9.ThenameoftheEleusiniancultfirstappearstodescribeothermystery cultsinHerodotus2.51.Therein,thehistoriandescribessecretritesinhonouroftheCabiriperformedinSamothracenotonlyas ὄργια,butalsousestheterm μυστήρια;seeHerodotus2.171.
2 Burkert1987,2,4–6.
3 Graf2003,241.
4 Burkert1987,6–7.
5 Seebelow,1.2.Mysteryterminology.
6 Seepreviousfootnote.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110790900-001
hispoems:thesereferencestakeadirectforminhis Dionysiaca,repleteasthey arewithscenesoftheBacchiccult,andarealsofoundinhis ParaphraseofSt. John’sGospel,wheretheyareallusivelyused.Thereasonsforthisaretobediscussedinthelaterpartsofthisbookanditisthereforeimperativethatwetakea closerlookattheEleusinianandDionysianmysteries.
TheEleusinianMysteries,likemanyotherGreekritualsperformedinhonour ofDemeter,wererelatedtothemythoftheabductionofPersephone-Koreby Hades,theruleroftheunderworld.7 Demeter,saddenedbythelossofherdaughter,madeallvegetationstopuntilherreturnandtookrefugeinEleusis,where sheestablishedmysteryritualsinherownhonour.8 Accordingtothewordsof thegoddessasformulatedintheHomeric HymntoDemeter,theseritualspromisedtheinitiatesamoreprosperouslifeonearthandahappierfateafterdeath.9 Theseritualswerecelebratedannuallybeginningwiththeearlydecadesofthe sixthcenturyBC,10 butEleusiswasaccordedthestatusofaplaceofworshipata muchearlierdate,alreadyintheMycenaeanperiod,althoughwedonotknow theexactnatureoftheritualsperformedthereatthattime.11 TheorderoftheEleusiniancelebrationsisknowntousonlyinverygeneralterms.Thereweretwo stagesofinitiation:thefirstwasknownas myesis,andthosewhowishedtoadvanceintheirinitiationwereallowedintothesecondstage, epopteia,usually ayearaftertheyhadbeenadmittedto myesis. 12
Thepreparationofcandidatesforthe myesis wasorganisedduringthe LesserMysteriesandtookplaceinspringintheAtheniandistrictofAgraion
7 Burkert1983,259.
8 ThismythislaidoutintheHomeric HymntoDemeter,whichiscloselyassociatedwiththe Eleusinianmysteries;seebelow.
9 HymntoDemeter 480–482(translatedbyG.Nagy): ‘Blessedisheamongearthboundmortalswhohasseen(ὄπωπεν)thesethings.Butwhoeverisuninitiated(ἀτελής)intherites,whoevertakesnopartinthem,willnevergetashareofthosesortsofthings[thattheinitiated get],oncetheydie,downbelowinthedankrealmsofmist’.SeealsoBurkert1983,293–296, andBurkert1987,20–21.
10 Burkert1987,2;Sourvinou-Inwood2003,26–27.TheHomeric HymntoDemeter,whichis databletothelateseventhorearlysixthcenturyBC,canberegardedasevidenceoftheheydayoftheEleusinianMysteriesatthetime.SeeBurkert1977b,422–423.
11 GeorgeMylonas(1961,29 –54)arguesthattheseritesformedpartofthecultofDemeter (47),candidlyadmittingthatthisclaimcannotbeprovedonthebasisofeithertheMycenaean tabletsorworksofartfromthatperiod(50–51).KarlKerényiwasoftheopinionthattherites performedinMycenaeantimesatEleusisshouldbequalifiedasamysterycult;seeKerényi 1967,18–25.MorerecentstudiestendtoindicatethatitisdifficulttodefinetheMycenaean cultwithafairdegreeofprecisionandleavethisasanopenquestion;seeCosmopoulos2003, 18 20.
12 Burkert1983,265,withnumerousreferencestoancientliteratureinnote1.
theIlissosRiver,whiletheproperinitiationtookplaceinautumnduringthe GreaterMysteries.13 OneoftheimportantpartsoftheLesserMysterieswasthat theinitiandsperformedcertainriteswhenhandlingsomesacredobjectsthatthey tookoutofaspecialliddedbasket(kiste)andthenplacedbackinside.14 Aspartof anotherinitiationrite(onethatisalsoalludedtointheHymntoDemeter),the persontobecomeinitiated – shroudedinaveil,keepingsilentandlookingatthe ground – satonastoolcoveredwithasheep’sfleeceandwassubjectedtoaritual ofpurification.15 AstheLesserMysterieswereprobablynolongerorganizedinthe Romanperiod,16 theritualsassociatedwiththemwerepresumablyincludedin onewayoranotherintothemaincelebrationsinautumn.
Allthosewhohadmettheprerequisiteconditionswereadmittedtotake partintheGreaterMysteriesregardlessoftheirgender,socialstatusororigin.17 OnthenineteenthdayofthemonthBoedromion,afterfourdaysofcelebration (theseincludedsacrificingapiglet,takingapurifyingritualbathatseaand fastinglikeDemeterasshemournedherlostdaughter),candidatesforinitiationwouldsetoffinaprocessionstartingfromtheAthenianagoraandtread theSacredWaytothesanctuaryinEleusis,twenty-fourkilometresaway.18 In theprocession,amongoutburstsoffestivejoy,astatueofDionysus-Iacchus wascarried,adeitythattheAtheniansassociatedwiththemysteriesofEleusis.19 Thepilgrimsreachedthesiteofthesanctuaryintheevening,carryinglit torchesintheirhands. 20 Havingperformedritualablutionsandtakenpartin ritualdances,theywaitedfortheeveningofthefollowingdaytobeadmitted intothesanctuary.21 There,intheTelesterion,alargehallsupportedonseveral rowsofcolumnsthatcouldaccommodateaboutthreethousandpeople,theritualofinitiationwasdulyperformed.22 Theritewaspresidedoverbyhereditary
13 Burkert1983,265–274;Simon1983,26–27.
14 Thisisdescribedinanoutlineintheso-called synthema,amysteryformulapreservedby ClementofAlexandria, Prot. 2.21.2.Formoreonthis,seeBurkert1983,269–274;Kerényi1967, 65–66and106;Bremmer2014,3.
15 Riedweg1987,144,161–162and168;Burkert1983,266–269.RadcliffeEdmonds(Edmonds 2006)arguesthattheritualof thronosis performedatEleusiswasmarkedlydifferentfromthat oftheCorybantmysteries.
16 Edmonds2006,360–361.
17 Bremmer2014,2 –3.Non-Greekspeakersandmurdererswereneverthelessexcluded: Bremmer2014,4.
18 Simon1983,29–32;Burkert1983,256–264;Burkert1987,77;Bremmer2014,4–5.
19 Burkert1987,106;Kerényi1967,64–65and155–162.
20 Bremmer2014,7.
21 Kerényi1967,71;Clinton1993,118;Bremmer2014,7–8.
22 Burkert1983,276‒277;Kerényi1967,89‒90;Clinton1993,118–119;Bremmer2014,8–9.
priests:a hierophantes (‘hierophant,hewhomakesholythingsvisible’)from theEleusinianfamilyofEumolpidae,a dadouchos ( ‘ torch-bearer ’ )fromthe AthenianKerykes,anda hierokeryx (‘theheraldofsacredrites’).23 Throughout theprocessofinitiation,fromtheLesserMysteriesallthewayintotheTelesterion,eachcandidatewasaccompaniedbya mystagogos (‘mystagogue’)(i.e.an alreadyinitiatedfriendorfamilymember),whogaveinstructionsandexplanationstotheinitiand.24
ThedetailsconcerningtheritualperformedintheTelesterionwereshrouded insecrecyanditwasstrictlyprohibitedtodisclosethemtotheuninitiated;asa consequence,allmodern-dayattemptsatreconstructingit,basedastheyareon allusionsandcluesoccurringonlyverysparselyintheancientsources,mustremainhypothetical.25 Thefastingobservedbytheinitiandsendedwiththedrinkingof kykeon,abeverageofbarleyandmint,whichDemeterdrankherselfwhen bewailingtheloss,aswereadintheHomeric Hymn tothegoddess.26 Therite itselfdoubtlessinvolvedasymbolicre-enactmentbytheinitiandsofhersearch forPersephone.27 Atacertainpointinthecelebrations,agongimitatingthe crashofthunderwasstruck,andthepriestletoutaloudcryinahigh-pitched voicecallingonPersephonetoreturntoearth.28 Thiswasechoedbytheeuphoric reactionofthepeoplegatheredintheTelesterion,commemoratingtheendofDemeter’ssorrowwiththefindingofherdaughter.29 Therewerealsootherelements oftheinitiationriterelatedtofertilityandabundanceofcropsthatwereclosely associatedwithEleusis.A phallos wasshowntotheparticipants,anditisprobablethatthehierophantandapriestessenteredtheAnactoron,asmallroominsidetheTelesterion(inaccessibletotheinitiands),wheretheyperformedactual orsymbolicsexualintercourse.30 Lightanddarknessalsoplayedanimportant
23 Burkert1987,36‒37.
24 Burkert1983,275;Kerényi1967,75;Bremmer2014,3.
25 Burkert1983,274‒275.
26 Itisnotknownatwhichexactmomentoftheceremonythiswasperformedorwhetherit wasconductedinsecrecy,seeBurkert1983,274‒275.KarlKerényi(Kerényi1967,65)claims thatthe kykeon wasdrunkduringtheprocession.The HymntoDemeter suggeststhatthiswas doneaftertheriteofplacingtheinitiandonastoolcoveredwithasheep’sfleece.
27 Bremmer2014,10–11,arguesthattheinitiandswereled,torchesinhand,outsideofthe Telesterion.KevinClinton(2003,66 –67)saysthatduringthesearchtheinitiandshadtheir eyesbandedandwereledbytheirmystagogues.
28 Burkert1983,286;Kerényi1967,84and94.
29 Burkert1987,75.JanBremmer(Bremmer2014,9–10)arguesthattheritesofthe myesis and epopteia tookplaceontwonights,thesearchforKoreassignedtothefirst.
30 Burkert1983,284–285;Bremmer2014,11–13.
