ES_(Vol 1) Addendum

Environmental Statement Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Ramboll EC.PA.12A-A July 2025

PREFACE Background

In July 2024, two hybrid planning applications (the ‘Hybrid Planning Applications’) were submitted by Earls Court Partnership Limited (the ‘Applicant’) to London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (‘LBHF’) (Reference:2024/01942/COMB) and to Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (‘RBKC’) (Reference: PP/24/05187) for the mixed-use phased redevelopment (the ‘Proposed Development’) of a site which is located in the Earls Court and West Kensington areas of West London (the ‘Site’). The Hybrid Planning Applications seek part full and part outline planning permission for the Site as a whole and the Proposed Development as a whole

The Hybrid Planning Applications were accompanied by an Environmental Statement (the July 2024 ES’) prepared by Ramboll UK Limited (‘Ramboll’) and a team of technical specialists. The July 2024 ES comprised the following documents:

• Non-Technical Summary;

• ES Volume 1: Main Environmental Statement Report;

• ES Volume 2: Built Heritage, Townscape and Visual Assessment (‘BHTVA’); and

• ES Volume 3: Technical Appendices

Since the submission of the Hybrid Planning Applications, post-application submission consultation has been undertaken with LBHF, RBKC, relevant statutory and non-statutory consultees, as well as stakeholders. As a result of the consultation feedback, amendments have been made to the Proposed Development. These amendments have been subject to post-application submission consultation with LBHF, RBKC, relevant consultees and stakeholders

In addition, Waterman Infrastructure and Environment Ltd. (‘Waterman’, the local planning authorities’ (LPAs’) EIA Advisor), Schroeders Begg LLP and Consil Limited (the LPAs’ Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing (‘DSO’) Advisors) undertook a review of the July 2024 ES.

Accordingly, amendments to the current Hybrid Planning Applications are being submitted together with this addendum to the July 2024 ES (the ‘2025 ES Addendum’) in order to assess any different or additional significant environmental effects which are likely to arise as a result of the proposed amendments In summary the proposed amendments comprise the following:

Detailed Component:

• Amendment of Plots EC05, EC06, WB03, WB04 and WB05 in response to updated Fire Safety Regulations (BS9991)1, in particular the introduction of a secondary escape stairwell and resultant amendments to core arrangements These requirements have resulted in the following:

Amendments to nternal layouts;

Minor increases to building footprints (Plots WB04, WB05 and EC06);

Minor height increases to Plots EC05 and EC06; Minor fenestration amendments;

Additional balcony and terrace provision at Plot EC05;

Amendments to external communal residential amenity space layouts at Plots EC05, WB03, WB04 and WB05;

Amendments to public realm and open space layouts at Plots EC05 and EC06;

Increase in total gross external area (GEA) floorspace;

Decrease in LBHF residential units by six;

• Decrease in long-stay cycle spaces and increase in short-stay cycle spaces; and

• Change in residential tenure and unit mix

Outline Component:

• Amendment of Parameter Plans in respect of the following:

Planning application boundary to reflect re-alignment of the LBHF Hybrid Application boundary between Plot WB05 and Empress State Building to the south;

Amendments to developments of Zones A, B and C - imits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

Addition to Development Zone O below ground level;

Development Zone N below ground level extension in area to the west;

Development Zone F (Plot EC03) maximum building height reduction of 3.5 m;

Development Zone X (Plot WK02) maximum parameter envelope setback to the north; and

Amendments to Site access, in particular the removal of vehicular access from Aisgill Avenue (via Mund Street) with the exception of emergency access

• Amendment of Development Specification in respect of the following:

Clarification of land uses within each Development Zone, to ensure alignment with maximum development limits and to add Hotel use within Development Zone K; and

Reduction of long-stay cycle parking spaces and short-stay parking spaces.

• Amendments to the Design Code in respect of the following:

To reflect or clarify amendments to the Parameter Plans;

Amended and new West Brompton Square design codes to enhance the synergy between active frontages and architectural elements;

New West Brompton Square design codes to ensure that the landscaping enhances the on-site SINC ecological corridor and respond to and align with the off-site Brompton Cemetery SINC's character;

Amended design codes in respect of Development Zone E (Plot EC10) to enhance built form articulation in response to townscape and heritage setting from key views;

New design code for potential Cluny Mews pedestrian and cycle connection;

Amended Cluny Mews design codes to clarify how buildings along Cluny Mews are articulated to create a synergy with the context, including the adjacent Cluny Mews development and St. Cuthbert's Church;

Additional design codes to enhance articulation of built form and respond to finer urban grain;

New West Kensington Square design codes to provide design principle for a potential new square outside West Kensington Station;

Amended and new play space design codes to clarify the approach to integrated planting and play space; to ensure play space includes accessible equipment; and to ensure planting establishes and retains high biodiversity value; and New design codes added in relation to building maintenance and existing trees.

The Proposed Development as amended is hereafter referred to as the ‘Amended Proposed Development’.

Reasons for Submission

An environmental impact assessment (‘EIA’) has been undertaken to examine whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development In addition and where relevant, post-application submission review comments from RBKC, LBHF, and the LPAs’ EIA and DSO Advisors, have been addressed.

The EIA has been prepared in accordance with the statutory procedures set out in the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘EIA Regulations’).

For ease of reference, the outcomes of the EIA of the Amended Proposed Development are presented in ES Volume 4: Environmental Statement Addendum, which forms the 2025 ES Addendum.

ES Volume 4 comprises the following constituent documents:

• ES Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum;

• ES Volume 2A: Built Heritage, Townscape and Visual Assessment Addendum; and

• ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum

In addition, a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) Addendum has been prepared.

The reader should refer to the constituent documents and read as appropriate together with the corresponding July 2024 ES Volumes.

Format of 2025 ESAddendum

The 2025 ES Addendum provides information necessary to assess the likely significant environmental effects of the proposed amendments and the Amended Proposed Development as a whole

Where July 2024 ES text/assessments remain valid it is because following review of the proposed amendments, the Amended Proposed Development as a whole, baseline conditions, policy and assessment guidance, post-application submission consultation comments, cumulative schemes and the impact assessments, it has been concluded by technical specialists that the July 2024 ES conclusions remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development and do not require update. As such, context and validation text have been presented in black

Where the previous text/assessments have required amendments, text has been highlighted in this shade of blue For example, where there are updates to the height of the Amended Detailed Component or amendment of text in the Design Code, which would result in an amendment to the previously reported assessment and effects, these updates have been shown in blue.

Where new text/assessments have been required, text has been highlighted in this shade of green. For example, where new elements are introduced to the Amended Proposed Development’s design and subsequently new assessments are undertaken for elements that were not previously considered, these updates have been shown in green.

The addendum document titles, tables and figures have been demarcated with the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Chapter 1A). These addendum documents/information are supplementary and additive to the July 2024 ES and should be read alongside (side-byside) the July 2024 ES.

Where material updates have been required, replacement tables and figures have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R)

Where new documents, tables or figures have been presented, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N) or July 2024 numbering/lettering have been continued.

The complete set of ES documents (July 2024 NTS, 2025 NTS Addendum, July 2024 ES (Volumes 1-3) and 2025 ES Addendum (Volume 4)), together with the applications and other supporting documents are available for viewing on the LBHF and RBKC websites:

• LBHF: https://www.lbhf.gov.uk/planning/planning-applications

• RBKC: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/planning-and-building-control/planning-applications

Comments should be directed to LBHF at:

Development Management Services

The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

Hammersmith Town Hall Extension

King Street

London

W6 9JU

Email: planning@lbhf.gov.uk

Comments should be directed to RBKC at:

Planning and Borough Development

The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Town Hall

Hornton Street

W8 7NX

Email: planning@rbkc.gov.uk

Contents

Preface

Chapter 1A: Introduction

Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology

Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution

Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description

Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description

Chapter 6A: Archaeology

Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics

Chapter 8A: Human Health

Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Chapter 10A: Air Quality

Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration

Chapter 12A: Ecology

Chapter 13A: Ground Conditions

Chapter 14A: Water Resources

Chapter 15A: Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill

Chapter 16A: Wind

Chapter 17A: Climate

Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Chapter 19A: Summary of Additional Mitigation and Residual Effects

Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations

1A INTRODUCTION

Introduction

1.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum presents the general description of the Site, relevant planning context, as well as the content and structure of the ES. More detailed information on the Site is provided in the technical assessments of this Volume, as well as ES Volume 2A and ES Volume 3A

12.1 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 1: Introduction and Volume 3, Technical Appendices 1.1-1.2 of the July 2024 ES The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but have been updated, where required Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’(e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

1.2 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the ES now comprises the following constituent documents that should be read together, as appropriate:

• Non-Technical Summary;

• Non-Technical Summary Addendum;

• ES Volume 1: Main Environmental Statement Report;

• ES Volume 2: Built Heritage, Townscape and Visual Assessment (‘BHTVA’);

• ES Volume 3: Technical Appendices;

• ES Volume 4:

ES Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum;

ES Volume 2A: Built Heritage, Townscape and Visual Assessment Addendum; and ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum

1.3 TechnicalAppendix 1.1 of the July 2024 ES remains valid Technical Appendix 1.2 has been amended and therefore this chapter is accompanied by the following amended technical appendix within ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices:

• Technical Appendix 1A.2A: EIA Regulation 18(5)(b) Statement Addendum

Development Context

1.4 The Site location and context; Site description; and environmental considerations set out in the July 2024 ES, remain valid

1.5 Since the submission of the July 2024 ES there has been a de minimus amendment to the Site redline boundary to realign the boundary with the Empress State Building (‘ESB’). The Site area increases by less than 1 m of hardstanding area (0.003 ha total increase) The amendment to the Site area is not material to the assessments undertaken or assessment conclusions reported in the July 2024 ES. Therefore, the Redline Boundary Plan presented in the July 2024 ES is considered to remain materially valid and has not been updated in the relevant technical assessments of the 2025 ES Addendum The amended redline boundary is presented in Figure 1A 1R for completeness. It is also noted that descriptive text associated with the below ground former Earl’s Court Station ticket hall has been updated in the drawing key for clarity.

1.6

All of the sensitive receptors presented in Chapter 1 of the July 2024 ES remain valid However, four built heritage receptors previously agreed to be scoped out of the July 2024 EIA, have been identified by RBKC for assessment in the post-application submission review comments. The four additional receptors comprise:

• 1-8 and 9-18 Collingham Gardens;

• 11A and 18A Collingham Gardens;

• Cheyne Conservation Area; and

• Royal Hospital Conservation Area.

RAMBOLL

Figure 1A.1R: Amended Site Redline Boundary Plan

Planning Context

1.7 The planning policy context and policy designations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid, with the exception of updates to policy and guidance outlined in this section.

1.8 In respect of national policy, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251

1.9 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the Purpose-Built Student Accommodation Local Plan Guidance (LPG)2 was adopted by the Greater London Authority (GLA) on 20 November 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to the PurposeBuilt Student Accommodation Draft LPG at the time of undertaking the EIA

1.10 In respect of local policy, the RBKC Trees and Development Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)3 was updated in 2023 and the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)4 was adopted on 24 July 2024 The July 2024 ES had regard to the Trees and Development SPD (2010) and the RBKC Draft New Local Plan at the time of undertaking the EIA

1.11 The planning history for the Site remains as presented in the July 2024 ES with the exception of the following:

• OBR (PP/21/00272) has lapsed;

• The Hybrid Planning Applications for the Proposed Development was submitted to LBHF and RBKC in July 2024;

• Further temporary meanwhile planning applications in LBHF have been submitted and consented under 2024/02746/FUL, 2025/00024/FUL, 2025/00161/FUL, 2024/02875/VAR, which generally replace previous temporary planning permissions, with the exception of one new meanwhile use on-site.

Applicant

1.12 The Applicant as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the amended Hybrid Planning Applications

Project Team

1.13 The project team as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for theAmended Proposed Development in all regards, with only one exception. The Human Health consultant is now RPS Group (previously Ben Cave Associates) and their technical competency details are provided within Technical Appendix 1A.2A: Regulation 18(5)(b) Statement of ES Volume 3A

Environmental Statement

1.14 The structure of the July 2024 ES remains valid. The 2025 ES Addendum is reported within an ES Volume 4 and an NTS Addendum to present the findings of the EIA of the Amended Proposed Development.

1.15 The 2025 ES Addendum comprises the following documents:

• Non-Technical Summary Addendum

• ES Volume 4 Environmental Statement Addendum: Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 1A: Introduction

Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology

Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution

Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description

Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description

Chapter 6A: Archaeology

Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics

Chapter 8A: Human Health

Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Chapter 10A: Air Quality

Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration

Chapter 12A: Ecology

Chapter 13A: Ground Conditions

Chapter 14A: Water Resources

Chapter 15A: Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill

Chapter 16A: Wind

Chapter 17A: Climate

Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Chapter 19A: Summary of Additional Mitigation and Residual Effects

Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations

• Volume 2A: Built Heritage, Townscape and Visual Assessment Addendum:

Chapter 1A: Built Heritage

o Technical Appendix 1A.2A: Maps of Heritage Study Area

o Technical Appendix 1A.3A: Amended Maps of Heritage Study Area Overlaid with Zone of Theoretical Visibility

o Technical Appendix 1A.6A: Maps of Heritage Assets Scoped in for Assessment

Chapter 2A: Townscape and Visual

o Technical Appendix 2A.IN: Updated Verified and Non-Verified Views

• Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

Technical Appendix 1A.2A: Regulation 18(5)(b) Statement Addendum

Technical Appendix 2A 6A: Aviation Impact Assessment Addendum

Technical Appendix 2A 7A: Telecommunications Impact Assessment Addendum

Technical Appendix 2A 8A: Construction Waste Management Plan Addendum

Technical Appendix 2A 9A: Operational Waste Management Plan Addendum

Technical Appendix 2A.10N: Waterman, Schroeders Begg and Consil Final Review of Environmental Statement

Technical Appendix 5A.1R: Amended Demolition and Construction Time Slices;

Technical Appendix 6A.1A: Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Addendum

Technical Appendix 9A.1A: Transport Link Data and Outputs Addendum

Technical Appendix 10A.1A: Amended Legislation, Policy and Consultation

Technical Appendix 10A.2A: Amended Assessment Methodology

Technical Appendix 10A.3A: Amended Model Results

Technical Appendix 11A.1A: Amended Legislation, Policy, Guidance and Consultations

Technical Appendix 11A.4A: Amended Construction Stage Information

Technical Appendix 11A.5A: Amended Operational Stage Information

Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Amended Noise and Vibration Site Suitability Assessment

Technical Appendix 12A.1A: Earls Court Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Addendum

Technical Appendix 13A.1A: Geo-Environmental Preliminary Risk Assessment Addendum

Technical Appendix 14A.1A: Flood Risk Assessment and Outline Drainage Strategy Addendum

Technical Appendix 15A.5A: Amended Scenario Overviews

Technical Appendix 15A 6A: Amended Daylight and Sunlight Results

Technical Appendix 15A.8A: Amended Window Maps

Technical Appendix 15A.9A: Amended No Sky Line Contour

Technical Appendix 15A.13A: Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing Contextual Report and Appendices

Technical Appendix 16A.2N: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulation Information

3

4

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 1A: Introduction

Technical Appendix 16A.3N: Landscape Modelling Information

Technical Appendix 16A.4N: Balcony Modelling Information

Technical Appendix 19A.1A: Borough Reporting Addendum

1.16 The Preface and Chapter 2A: EIAApproach and Methodology of this Volume explain the approach adopted in preparing the 2025 ES Addendum and how the 2025 ES Addendum should be read together with the July 2024 ES.

1.17 The required content of an ES is set out in Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations. The information presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. Table 1A 1 indicates where in the 2025 ES Addendum the requirements have been met.

Table 1A 1: Information Required in an Environmental Statement (Schedule 4 of EIA Regulations)

Required Information Chapter/Section of ES

1 A description of the development, including in particular:

• a description of the location of the proposed development;

• a description of the physical characteristics of the proposed development, including, where relevant, requisite demolition works, and the land-use requirements during the operation stage;

• a description of the main characteristics of the operational phase of the proposed development (in particular any production process), for instance, energy demand and energy used, nature and quantity of the materials and natural resources (including water, land, soil and biodiversity) used;

• an estimate, by type and quantity, of expected residues and emissions (such as water, air, soil and subsoil pollution, noise, vibration, light, heat, radiation and quantities and types of waste produced during the operation stage.

2 A description of the reasonable alternatives (for example in terms of development design, technology, location, size and scale) studied by the Applicant, which are relevant to the proposed development and its specific characteristics, and an indication of the main reasons for selecting the chosen option, including a comparison of the environmental effects.

3 A description of the relevant aspects of the current state of the environment (baseline scenario) and an outline of the likely evolution thereof without implementation of the proposed development as far as natural changes from the baseline scenario can be assessed with reasonable effort on the basis of the availability of environmental information and scientific knowledge.

4 A description of the factors specified in Regulation 4(2) likely to be significantly affected by the proposed development: population, human health, biodiversity (for example fauna and flora), land (for example land take), soil (for example organic matter, erosion, compaction, sealing), water (for example hydromorphological changes, quantity and quality), air, climate (for example greenhouse gas emissions, impacts relevant to adaptation), material assets, cultural heritage, including architectural and archaeological aspects, and landscape.

5 A description of the likely significant effects of the proposed development on the environment resulting from, inter alia:

a) the construction and existence of the development including, where relevant, demolition works;

b) the use of natural resources, in particular land, soil, water and biodiversity, considering as far as possible the sustainable availability of these resources;

c) the emission of pollutants, noise, vibration, light, heat and radiation, the creation of nuisances, and the disposal and recovery of waste;

d) the risks to human health, cultural heritage or the environment (for example due to accidents or disasters);

e) the cumulation of effects with other existing and/or approved projects, taking into account any existing environmental problems relating to areas of particular environmental importance likely to be affected or the use of natural resources;

ES Chapter 1A: Introduction, Volume 1A

ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description, Volume 1A

ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description, Volume 1A

ES Chapters 6A-17A, Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

ES Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution, Volume 1A

ES Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution, Volume 1A

ES Chapters 6A-17A, Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

Table 1A.1: Information Required in an Environmental Statement (Schedule 4 of EIA Regulations) Required Information Chapter/Section of ES f) the impact of the project on climate (for example the nature and magnitude of greenhouse gas emissions) and the vulnerability of the project to climate change; and g) the technologies and the substances used.

The description of the likely significant effects on the factors specified in Regulation 4(2) should cover the direct effects and any indirect, secondary, cumulative, transboundary, short-term, medium-term and long-term, permanent and temporary, positive and negative effects of the development.

The description should take into account the environmental protection objectives established at Union or Member State level which are relevant to the proposed development, including in particular those established under Council Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC.

6 A description of the forecasting methods or evidence, used to identify and assess the significant effects on the environment, including details of difficulties (for example technical deficiencies or lack of knowledge) encountered compiling the required information and the main uncertainties involved.

7 A description of the measures envisaged to avoid, prevent, reduce or, if possible, offset any identified significant adverse effects on the environment and, where appropriate, of any proposed monitoring arrangements (for example the preparation of a post-project analysis).

The description should explain the extent to which significant adverse effects on the environment are avoided, prevented, reduced or offset, and should cover both the construction and operational phases.

8 A description of the expected significant adverse effects of the development on the environment deriving from the vulnerability of the development to risks of major accidents and/or disasters which are relevant to the project concerned. Relevant information available and obtained through risk assessments pursuant to EU legislation such as Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council or Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom or UK environmental assessments may be used for this purpose provided that the requirements of this Directive are met. Where appropriate, this description should include measures envisaged to prevent or mitigate the significant adverse effects of such events on the environment and details of the preparedness for and proposed response to such emergencies.

ES Chapters 6A-17A, Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description, Volume 1A Mitigation sections of ES Chapters 6A-17A, Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

ES Chapters 6A-17A, Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

ES Chapters 6A-17A, Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

9 A non-technical summary of the information provided under 1 to 8 above. Non-Technical Summary Addendum

10 A reference list detailing the sources used for the descriptions and assessments included in the ES.

ES Chapters 1A-17A, ES Volume 1A and ES Volumes 2A and 3A

1.18 Good practice in the preparation of an ES is defined in a number of sources, with more specific issues covered by ES review checklists. In terms of widely applicable and practical guidance, and consistent with the approach followed for ES Volumes 1 to 3 of the July 2024 ES, the IEMA Quality Mark Indicator check has been referenced in producing ES Volume 4 and the NTS Addendum. Ramboll is a registrant of the IEMA Quality Mark

2A EIA PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY

Introduction

2.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum Volume 1A presents the general approach to the process and methodology that is adopted when undertaking an EIA. It describes the legislative framework in which the EIA for the Amended Proposed Development was undertaken and identifies the key guidance that was considered. The post-application submission scoping and consultation process is outlined, as well as the EIA approach and methodology adopted for the Amended Proposed Development.

2.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 2: EIA Process and Methodology and Volume 3, Technical Appendices 2.1-2.9 of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but have been updated, where required Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

2.3 The chapter is supported by the following addendum appendices in ES Volume 3A:

• Technical Appendix 1A.2A: Regulation 18(5)(b) Statement Addendum;

• Technical Appendix 2A.6A: Aviation Impact Assessment Addendum;

• Technical Appendix 2A.7A: Telecommunications Impact Assessment Addendum;

• Technical Appendix 2A.8A: Construction Waste Management Plan Addendum;

• Technical Appendix 2A.9A: Operational Waste Management Plan Addendum; and

• Technical Appendix 2A.10N: Waterman, Schroeders Begg and Consil Final Review of Environmental Statement.

2.4 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. Further detail on how the EIA methodology has been tailored to each environmental topic of the EIA is presented in the relevant updated technical assessment chapters of 2025 ES Addendum Volumes 1A and 2A

Environmental Impact Assessment

2.5 The background to EIA as described in Chapter 2 of July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

2.6 However, the following additional, updated and new guidance have been considered in undertaking this EIA:

• Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (‘IEMA’): IEMA Competent Expert for Health Impact Assessments including Health in Environmental Assessments1; IEMA Determining Significance for Human Health n Environmental Impact Assessment2;

• Historic England (‘HE’): The Setting of Heritage Assets – Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in Planning (updated 2017)3;

• Department for Transport: Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (‘DMRB’) – LA series (2024)4;

• Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (‘MHCLG’) NPPF, 20255; PPG6;

1 IEMA, 2024 Competent Expert for Health Impact Assessments including Health in Environmental Assessments. IEMA.

2 IEMA, 2022. Determining Significance for Human Health in Environmental Impact Assessment IEMA.

3 Historic England, 2017. The Setting of Heritage Assets – Historic Environment Good Practice Advice in Planning: 3. Historic England in collaboration with the Historic Environment Forum, Second Edition, Historic England 2017

4 Department for Transport, 2024. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges - LA series, June 2024. Department for Transport.

5 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO

Online Resource - Guidance for Environmental Impact Assessment (updated 2020)7; and • Institute of Air Quality Management (‘IAQM’): Assessment of Dust from Demolition and Construction8

2.7 Updated policy and topic specific assessment guidance of relevance to individual technical assessments have been presented in Chapters 6A-17A of this Volume, as well as ES Volume 2A. In accordance with the EIA Regulations, the updated EIA has been undertaken based on the Amended Proposed Development as described in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Demolition and Construction Description of this Volume.

EIA Process

2.8 The EIA process as described in the July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid for the pre-application submission stage. The scale and nature of the Amended Proposed Development remains consistent with the Proposed Development that was subject to pre-application submission EIA Scoping consultation. Therefore, the need for a formal updated Scoping exercise for the post-application submission stage was not identified.

Post-Application Submission Consultation

2.9 Since submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission consultation has been undertaken with LBHF, RBKC, statutory and non-statutory consultees and stakeholders.

2.10 Waterman (the LPAs’ EIA Advisor), Schroeders Begg LLP and Consil Limited (the LPAs’ Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing (‘DSO’) Advisors) undertook a review of the July 2024 ES. In addition, comments have been provided by LBHF and RBKC officers. The Applicant has considered and responded to these comments (see Technical Appendix 2A.10N). Consultee comments have been addressed separately.

2.11 A series of post-application submission meetings were held with the LPAs’ EIA and DSO Advisors to discuss a range of topics and the July 2024 ES review comments. The following topics were discussed:

• EIA Approach;

• Health;

• Transport;

• Air Quality;

• Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill; and

• Wind Microclimate.

2.12 Feedback from and agreements reached during the post-submission consultation and meetings have been incorporated into the relevant technical assessments of the 2025 ES Addendum as appropriate.

2.13 Where the outcomes of post-application submission consultation have required amendments to the July 2024 ES, this has been directly reported within relevant corresponding chapters of the 2025 ES Addendum.

Scope of EIA

2.14 The scope of the EIA as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of non-significant issues and potentially significant issues.

6 Department for Communities and Local Government (Live Document) Planning Practice Guidance [online] Available: http://planningguidance.communities.gov.uk/.

7 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2014 (updated 2020). Guidance for Environmental Impact Assessment. DCLG.

8 IAQM, 2024. Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction V2.2. Institute of Air Quality Management, London. Available: https://iaqm.co.uk/guidance/

EIA Approach

2.15 The overall approach to the EIA as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

2.16 The technical specialist team has considered the potential for the Amended Proposed Development as a whole to generate any additional or different significant environmental effects to those reported in the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development

2.17 The approach adopted in respect of the consideration of alternatives, the existing and future baselines (including meanwhile uses), alternative baseline, the receptors, the impact assessment approach (including the approach to the cumulative assessment), remain valid. Where reference is made to technical assessments of the July 2024 ES, reference should also now be made to the updated technical assessments presented in the 2025 ES Addendum. The following paragraphs clarifies and amends a number of aspects in relation to the impact assessment approach and assessment methodology, for completeness.

Basis of EIA

2.18 The updated EIA has been undertaken based on the:

• Site as shown and described in Chapters 1 and 1A: Introduction, as well as the individual technical assessments (ES Chapters 6/6A to 17/17A) of ES Volume 1/1A and ES Volume 2A; and

• Amended Proposed Development as shown and described in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description of this Volume 1A.

2.19 The Amended Proposed Development described in ES Chapters 4A and 5A includes mitigation which has been amended or embedded through the post-application submission design evolution process.

2.20 Given the nature of the Hybrid Planning Applications, the Amended Proposed Development comprises an Amended Detailed Component and an Amended Outline Component.

2.21 The approach to assessment of the Detailed Component and Outline Component as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. Sources of Proposed Development information presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid, but have been updated for the Amended Proposed Development. These have been referenced as appropriate in the updated technical assessments of the 2025 ES Addendum.

Illustrative Masterplan

2.22 An Illustrative Masterplan (the ‘July 2024 Illustrative Scheme’) was previously developed to provide an indication of one version in which the development controls of the Outline Component could be progressed and developed. The July 2024 Illustrative Scheme was assessed for specific technical topics to provide additional context in relation to potential impacts arising as a result of the Proposed Development. The July 2024 Illustrative Scheme assessment was undertaken in addition to the assessment of the Outline Component’s Control Documents (Parameters, Development Specification and Design Code)

2.23 The July 2024 Illustrative Scheme was assessed for wind microclimate and light pollution In respect of the BHTVA, accurate visual representations (‘AVRs’) of the July 2024 Illustrative Scheme were provided to illustrate and provide additional context as to how the Design Code controls could be delivered.

2.24 In addition to the July 2024 Illustrative Scheme, an UGF Illustrative Landscape Scheme was also developed to demonstrate that the Applicant’s commitments in respect of urban greening factor (‘UGF’) and biodiversity net gain (‘BNG') could be delivered. The July 2024 UGF Illustrative Landscape Scheme represents one version of how the commitments could be achieved through the landscaping proposals.

2.25 The 2025 ES Addendum has assessed the Amended Proposed Development as a whole, considering the amended Parameters, Development Specification and Design Code controls of the Amended Outline Component. It is not considered proportionate nor necessary to undertake further assessment of any illustrative schemes prepared This was agreed in post-submission consultations with Waterman.

Lillie Bridge Depot

2.26 The approach adopted in respect of Lillie Bridge Depot (‘LBD’) as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2.27 At the time of undertaking the EIA, TfL has confirmed that further work in respect of the LBD relocation works will not be undertaken unless permission is granted for the Amended Proposed Development Potential environmental effects arising as a result of the relocation works cannot therefore be considered at this point and will be considered as appropriate, either as part of the submission of planning applications for those new sites, or at later stages (for example at Reserved Matters Application stage) of the Amended Proposed Development

Assessment Methodology

2.28 In respect of general method, development stages, development scenarios, assessment scenarios, worst-case scenarios, mitigation, impacts and effects and significance, the information presented within the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2.29 The approach adopted in respect of ntra-project and inter-project cumulative assessment remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the below clarifications

2.30 In regard to inter-project cumulative effects, the list of cumulative schemes considered in the July 2024 ES, was reviewed and updated, having consideration of amendment applications and construction progress. The status of each cumulative scheme assessed in the July 2024 ES was reviewed and an updated screening exercise was undertaken which is presented in Table 2A 1A. Where the information presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid, this has not been repeated for the sake of proportionality. Only amended or new information is presented.

2.31 Two new cumulative scheme have been identified for assessment, the Mund Street School site and the Empress State Building (ESB) Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) scheme

2.32 In respect of the Mund Street School site scheme, a planning application has not been submitted at the time of preparing this EIA. Therefore a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the scheme within the inter-project cumulative assessments of each technical chapter, due to the:

• proximity of the scheme to the Site (adjacent to western boundary);

• Greater London Authority (‘GLA’) request for consideration of microclimate effects between the two schemes; and

• potential for the scheme and the Hybrid Planning Applications to be determined at the same time.

2.33 In respect of the ESB ASHP, a planning application has been submitted, but it has not determined at the time of undertaking this EIA. However, due to the proximity of the ESB building to the Site (approximately 35 m from the southwestern boundary), there is the potential for cumulative noise effects and therefore, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken.

2.34 Accordingly, a total of 19 cumulative schemes were considered in the inter-project cumulative assessment of the Amended Proposed Development. The location of these 19 cumulative schemes is presented in Figure 2A.1A

Assumptions and Limitations

2.35 In respect of assumptions and limitations, those presented in Chapter 2 of July 2024 ES Volume 1 remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Technical Assessment Chapters

2.36 The structure of technical chapters within the 2025 ES Addendum remains unchanged from the structure of the July 2024 ES.

2A 1A: Amended Cumulative Schemes Screening

1 Land to the rear of 1 Cluny Mews, and 51-63 Philbeach Gardens, London, SW5

2 100 West Cromwell Road, London, W14 8PB

3 257-265 Kensington High Street, and 4-10 and 24 Earl's Court Road, London, W8

PP/18/00599 Amended by:

NMA/21/02219 27 April 2021

Understood to be completed now

PP/19/00781 Completion is due late 2026/ early 2027.

PP/14/07276 Implemented. Amended by:

NMA/22/03116

NMA/22/03842

NMA/22/04779

NMA/22/04169

PP/19/05105

PP/22/07748

NMA/23/06195

NMA/24/03649

Pre-commencement conditions discharged.

1 June 2022

July 2022 26 August 2022 04 November 2022 03 November 2021 23 August 2023 19 October 2023 10 October 2024

Prior to occupation conditions have started to be discharged for prior to completion and occupation triggers (e.g. CON/24/02044 / CON/24/05055 / CON/25/00776 – most recently approved 17 April 2025.

ES summary remains

For consistency, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

100 West Cromwell Road is still under construction, with completion expected in late 2026/ early 2027 and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 0.63 A Non Material Amendments (NMA) application has been submitted since the July 2024 ES. It is not considered that the NMA would alter the conclusions of the cumulative assessment within the July 2024 ES. In addition, given the fact that 257-265 Kensington High Street, and 4-10 and 24 Earl's Court Road is still at an advanced stage of construction, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

344-350 Old Brompton Road, London, SW5 9JU

LBHF

4 Fulham Gasworks, Imperial Road, SW6 2AD

PP/14/07276

Amended by:

NMA/22/04169

NMA/22/02626 02 June2022 23 May 2022

PP/22/07748 Amended by:

PP/23/07953

NMA/24/03649 S73 still under consideration 1 October 2024.

PP/23/07953 No documentation uploaded onto the RBKC portal since April 2024.

NMA/24/03649 1 October 2024

PP/21/00272 Application lapsed

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid. Within Site This application has now lapsed and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

NMA/23/02884 No further information July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

2018/02100/COMB Amended by:

2021/00531/NMAT

2021/04010/RES

2022/00559/RES 2022/02299/NMAT

13/04/2021

14/07/2022

22/07/2022

13/10/2022

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

1.18 RMAs for Phases 2-4 have been approved. Whilst RMAs have been approved, it is considered that the outline parameters represent a worst-case and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES for the assessment of the Fulham Gasworks cumulative scheme remains valid. In addition, given the distance of the Fulham gasworks from the Site, it is considered that any details

Table 2A 1A: Amended Cumulative Schemes Screening

2021/03837/NMAT 2022/02649/NMAT 2023/01262/NMAT

2023/03344/NMAT 2023/02126/NMAT 2023/02912/NMAT 2024/00818/NMA

2023/01146/FUL 2024/01242/NMAT 2023/01156/NMAT 2024/00961/VAR

2024/01420/RES

2024/01242/NMAT 2025/00852/VAPO

2024/01785/NMAT 2023/03344/NMAT 2023/03113/RES

2019/02707/NMAT

5 Olympia Exhibition Centre, Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UX (including the Maclise Road Multi Storey Car Park)

2018/03100/FUL

Amended by:

2020/01048/VAR

2021/00755/NMAT

2021/01996/NMAT

2021/02652/NMAT

2021/04165/NMAT

2021/04166/VAR

2022/03200/NMAT

2025/01035/NMAT

02/12/2022

25/04/2023

07/12/2023

07/03/2024

21/03/2024

19/04/2024

20/05/2024

30/05/2024

03/07/2024

23/07/2024

03/12/2024

17/01/2025

17/01/2025

Pending Pending Pending Pending

Several discharge of planning conditions pending. Pending

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

within the reserved matters applications would not materiality affect the conclusions of the July 2024 ES cumulative assessment.

6 Maclise Multi-Storey Car Park (MSCP) Olympia Exhibition Centre Hammersmith Road London, W14 8UX

2021/04167/FUL

Amended by:

2021/04165/NMAT

2024/00544/DET

7 January 2021

7 January 2021

26 March 2021

1 October 2021

24 January 2022

31 October 2023

31 October 2023

Pending Consideration

Pending consideration

Numerous conditions have been approved - with the most recent one being 12 February 2021. The most recent details discharge application relates to a prior to commencement.

Currently discharging prior to first operational use conditions – 49 (EVCP), 31 (Extraction and Odour Control system for non-domestic kitchens), 16/17 Verification/ long term methodology for contamination.

Completion primarily anticipated in 2025, with the remaining aspects anticipated in 2026.

No further updates July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

0.59 Given the fact that the Olympia Exhibition Centre (including the Maclise Road Multi Storey Car Park) is still at an advanced stage of construction, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

0.79

Maclise Multi-Storey Car Park (MSCP) Olympia Exhibition Centre is still at an advanced stage of construction and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2A 1A: Amended Cumulative Schemes Screening

7 Former West London Magistrate's Court, 181 Talgarth Road, London W6 8DN

8 Edith Summerskill House Clem Attlee Court Lillie Road, London SW6 7TD

9 St Pauls Girls School Brook Green, London, W6 7BS

2020/00915/FUL No further updates July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

2021/03561/FUL The development is currently being built out in accordance with 2021/03561/FUL Ongoing discharge of planning conditions.

2020/01283/FUL No further updates

2024/02208/NMAT 07 October 2024

2020/01524/FUL Amended by:

2022/00367/NMAT 09 March 2022

A number of prior to commencement conditions to cover phases 4 and 5 were submitted in March 2025 ref. 2025/00564/DET (15,16,17,18,19,20), and are currently pending consideration.

Construction for phases 4 and 5 are scheduled for April 2025 and projected to take 166 weeks to complete (June 2028).

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

10 Car, Coach and Lorry Park and 20 Seagrave Road, Diary House and Adjoining Electricity Substation Roxby Place London SW6 (known as ‘Lillie Square’)

11 1 - 9 Lillie Road, Part of Diary House, Roxby Place and Land Adjacent to the Railway Tracks, London SW6

12 43 Brook Green London W6 7EF

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

Avonmore Primary School Avonmore Road London W14 8RL

Liberty House 76 Hammersmith Road London W14 8UD

2011/02000/FUL No further updates July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

Phase 2 completed. No discharge of condition application references phase 3. July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

2013/02620/FUL

Amended by:

2016/03834/NMAT 2015/00960/NMAT 09 September 2016 27 March 2015

No condition discharge applications since 2020 July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

2024/02632/NMAT No further updates

Prior to commencement conditions being discharged.

Contractor appointed January 2024. Assume construction started July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

2023/03051/FR3 No further updates July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

0.00

The approach adopted in July 2024 ES remains valid.

Former West London Magistrate's Court, 181 Talgarth Road is still at an advanced stage of construction and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

The approach adopted in July 2024 ES remains valid.

Given the fact that the application has had no material amendments since May 2024, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

St Pauls Girls School Brook Green is under construction. Construction commenced in April 2025 and is anticipated to be completed in July 2028 and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

0.74

As there has been no further update to this scheme, it has been assumed that phase 3 is still under construction and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Given the fact that the application has had no material amendments since March 2015, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Construction assumed at early stage. Therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid..

2019/01742/FUL No further updates

2024 ES summary remains valid. 0.69

Relocation of Avonmore Primary School to the former Gibbs Green school site has been approved with conditions. It is now assumed that the relocation would occur early 2025. The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

There is no further publicly available update on this application. Given a new planning application has been submitted on the same site (2024/02007/FUL), it is reasonable to assume this application has been revoked or superseded. As such, it is reasonable to assume this application would not be built and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2024/02007/FUL No further updates

Partial demolition and reconfiguration and extension of existing buildings and basement, together with the erection of new buildings and extensions, for a mixed-use development

0.69 No, as the application has not determined.

Table 2A 1A: Amended Cumulative Schemes Screening No. Cumulative Scheme Reference

13 68-72 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

2017/02883/FUL 2022/00860/CLE Scheme has been lawfully implemented –Certificate of Lawful Existing Use or Development (CLEUD) by demolition of front canopy in April 2022. No additional works have progressed since.

comprising life science/office accommodation (Use Class E) in a 9 storey building (plus basement and plant), and a hotel (Use Class C1) in a part 6 / part 10 storey building (plus basement and plant), including ancillary café/restaurant/bar space, conferencing and meeting facilities, gym and amenity uses, alongside new public realm and landscape works, pedestrian/vehicle/cycle/highway/access works and associated works including servicing, plant, energy equipment and storage.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 0.62 It is assumed that the development is still at an early stage of construction and therefore, the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

14 Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

2017/04752/FUL Approved November 2019 (permission lapsed). See below – new scheme. July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 0.59

2024/03171/NMA No further updates Prior to commencement conditions pending consideration: 5,6,17, 20, 23, 24, 25, 34, 57 submitted between September 2024 and February 2025.

July 2024 ES summary remains valid. As the application was approved in August 2024, it is not considered that construction would have progressed to a material degree and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

3 Shortlands W6 8DA

2020/00150/FUL No further updates July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 0.92 The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid. 181 - 187 King Street Town Hall Extension, Town Hall Frontage And Land West Of Nigel Playfair Avenue (West) London W6

15 Landmark House Hammersmith Bridge Road London W6 9EJ

16 The Triangle (5-17 Hammersmith Grove) and Britannia House (1-11 Glenthorne Road), 3 and 3A Hammersmith Grove and 12-18 Beadon Road, Hammersmith, London W6 0LH

17 70-80 Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TN

2013/03091/FUL 2016/00619/VAR Approved 17 April 2014 Construction works in progress. 21 September 2016 July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 1.87 The approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2017/00172/FUL All submitted discharge of condition applications have been withdrawn (last submitted in March 2019).

2018/04037/VAR Prior to commencement conditions have been discharged. Last approval 12 July 2019.

2024 ES summary remains valid. 1.38

July 2024 ES summary remains valid.

No further information has been obtained for this cumulative scheme and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES is considered to remain valid.

2017/02717/FUL No further information July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 1.39 No further information has been obtained for this cumulative scheme and therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

2023/00087/FR3 Target for completion Autumn 2026. Main construction works to start February 2025. Discharging pre-comm conditions. CEMP indicates:

• Site setup and demolition: January 2025;

• Excavation and piling: Mid February to Early March 2025;

• Sub-structure: March-June 2025; July 2024 ES summary remains valid. 0.15 Demolition has been completed on-site and piling has commenced. Construction works are likely to overlap with the Amended Proposed Development programme. Therefore, the approach adopted for the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Table 2A 1A: Amended Cumulative Schemes Screening

No. Cumulative Scheme Reference

Garden Studios 14B Hammersmith Broadway London W6 7AB

Land At The Former Hartopp Point And Lannoy Point Aintree Estate Pellant Road London SW6 7NG

18 Mund Street,103 Gibbs Green Close, London, W14 9NE

2022/00362/FUL

2022/01346/FR3

2023/02399/NMAT 2024/00467/NMAT 2024/02361/NMAT

Planning application is anticipated to be submitted in Quarter 2 2025.

• Super-structure: May-August 2025;

• Cladding: July 2025-May 2026;

• Fit-out, testing and commissioning: August 2025- October 2026

Approved at Planning Committee January 2025, subject to completion of S106

Approved February 2023.

Discharge of conditions and NMA applications submitted and approved. Under construction.

26 October 2023

25 July 2024

28 November 2024

April 2025 target date to submit planning application based on consultation website

Demolition of existing building and erection of a 6 storey office building (Class E).

Redevelopment of the site comprising the erection of two buildings (split into Blocks A, B and C) ranging in height from 3 to 7 storeys to deliver 134 residential units (Class C3) together with associated parking, cycle parking, hard and soft landscaping, play space, access, utilities and other associated works, including demolition of the existing substation.

107 homes, 51% affordable, over five buildings, ranging between 1–11 storeys.

1.2 No, beyond the search area for cumulative schemes and below the threshold criteria.

1.1 No, beyond the search area for cumulative schemes and below the threshold criteria.

19 Empress State Building Empress Approach London SW6 1TR

2025/01364/FUL Application validated 16 May 2025 The installation of Air / Water Source Heat Pumps, generators, an associated substation, relocation and reduction in size of an existing container and re-arrangement of car parking spaces.

0.035 The former Gibbs Green school on Mund Street (immediately west of the Site) would house the relocated Avonmore Primary School for two years (2025-2027). Once the Avonmore Primary school has vacated the site in 2027, it is anticipated that construction of Mund Street school site scheme would commence. The Mund Street school site falls below the cumulative scheme criteria and a planning application has not yet been submitted. However, due to the proximity of this scheme to the Site and the potential for overlapping construction programmes, the Mund Street school site scheme has been considered in the EIA. A qualitative assessment has been undertaken.

0.01

Yes for Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration due to close proximity of the Empress State Building (‘ESB’) and the potential for cumulative noise effects to occur. No for all other topics, noting that the scheme does not meet the threshold criteria and due to the minor nature of the works no other cumulative effects are likely to occur.

Figure 2A.1A: Location of Qualifying Cumulative Schemes for EIA

3A ALTERNATIVES AND DESIGN EVOLUTION

Introduction

3.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the further design evolution process undertaken by the Applicant for the post-application submission stage. It summarises the ongoing consultation process and how LPA, consultee and stakeholder comments have informed the proposed amendments to the Detailed and Outline Components of the Proposed Development.

3.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 3: Alternatives and Design Evolution of the July 2024 ES. As the chapter summarises the pre-application submission stage, the majority of information remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development and has only been updated where required to reflect the post-application submission stage. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

3.3 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid in respect of the pre-application submission stage.

Vision

3.4 The vision presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Planning Policy Considerations

3.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the alternatives for and the design evolution of the Amended Proposed Development

3.6 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

3.7 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policies at the pre-application submission stage. The adopted RBKC New Local Plan does not introduce any additional matters for consideration in the alternatives for and the design evolution of the Proposed Development

Layout and Design Alternatives

3.11 The layout and design alternatives, engagement process, Illustrative Masterplan evolution, key design and environmental considerations and preferred option for the pre-application submission stage as presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

3.12 The following sub-sections describe the post-application submission design evolution process undertaken by the Applicant. A series of design responses are presented and described along with the necessary explanations of key design, planning and environmental considerations that informed the further evolution of the design

Overview

3.13 The post-application submission design evolution of the Proposed Development has been an iterative process in response to consultation feedback received from the LBHF, RBKC, consultees and other stakeholders further to the statutory consultation period

3.14 Stages 1-3 of the design evolution and engagement process presented in Figure 3.2 of the July 2024 ES relates to the pre-application submission stage and remains valid.

3.15 Figure 3A 1N presents the post-submission stage timeline including design milestones and engagement events which have informed the amended development proposals

3.16 The feedback review and response and subsequent design evolution process can be summarised as follows

• Feedback review:

3.8 The 'Do-Nothing' scenario presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Site Alternatives

3.9 The site alternatives presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Land Use Alternatives

3.10 The and use alternatives presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Detailed feedback was received from RBKC, LBHF, statutory consultees, other key stakeholders including the GLA, Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Secured by Design, utility undertakers, Royal Parks, Historic England, TfL and NHS. This feedback was reviewed by the Applicant and the project team and key topics requiring response were identified.

• Design response workshops:

A series of design review workshops were held with RBKC and LBHF, as part of an iterative engagement process, which were structured around the feedback Workshops provided an opportunity to clarify feedback and present proposed design responses.

• Finalising updates:

Design amendments were finalised resulting in the Amended Proposed Development Control Documents and supporting Illustrative Masterplan material within the Design and Access Statement (DAS) Addendum were updated, as well as a number of other documents. 2

Figure 3A.1N: Post-Application Submission Design Evolution and Engagement Timeline

3.17 In addition to the design response workshops, feedback was grouped into three categories: clarification, further information or alternative illustrative designs, or changes to the Detailed and Outline Component documents

Engagement Process

3.18 Alongside the design response workshops, ongoing post-submission consultation comprising community events and key stakeholder meetings were held

3.19 The Applicant’s proactive approach to engagement has sought the following:

• Raise awareness of the Hybrid Planning Applications with residents and the wider public;

• Support neighbours in accessing and understanding the content of the Hybrid Planning Applications documentation;

• Continue to engage local people, stakeholders and the members of the Public Realm Inclusivity Panel on key themes related to the project;

• Encourage residents and businesses to submit their views to the Local Planning Authorities;

• Continue to embed the Applicant and the project into the local community as a long-term partner; and

• Answer questions raised.

3.20 This section summarises the key themes and outcomes from these meetings and events. The Statement of Community Involvement Addendum and Planning Statement Addendum provide a full list of statutory, consultee meetings and community events that took place post-application submission Community

3.21 Since the validation of the Hybrid Planning Applications documentation in September 2024, the Applicant has met and had direct conversations with 2,319 residents, stakeholders and members of the public.

3.22 Copies of selected Hybrid Planning Applications documents were made available for members of the public to view at Cobbs Hall within LBHF and at the Town Hall in South Kensington, and at Brompton Library and North Kensington Library within RBKC Residents were appropriately notified of the Hybrid Planning Applications.

3.23 Feedback from these engagements, although informal, has shown a good level of support and a sense of urgency for delivery of the project and the local benefits it will bring, notably the new public spaces and pedestrian connections across the Site.

3.24 An analysis of sentiment gathered by the Applicant staff on the doorstep of over 1,000 homes in the area since September 2024 shows that more people spoken to (33 %) support the project than oppose it (22 %). The remaining 45 % of residents were neutral - neither supported or objected.

3.25 Community engagement continued from September 2024 (when Planning Applications documents were validated and available to the public) to July 2025 and can be summarised as follows:

• An updated public exhibition at Conversation Corner with printed copies of key Hybrid Planning Applications documents;

• Five ‘Understanding the Detail’ public meetings for residents living close to the Site to explain and guide access to the Hybrid Planning Applications;

• Four meetings of the Public Realm Inclusivity Panel;

• One Safety Panel meeting and one launch of the Inclusive Safety Toolkit;

• 3,119 local homes visited via Doorstep Engagement across the area surrounding the Site;

• Six public pop-up events meeting 195 people;

• Ten Site tours for local residents and members of the public welcoming 252 people (ongoing);

• 22 open drop-in sessions at Conversation Corner attended by 195 people;

• Six events at the Community Hub attended by 265 people;

• 13 meetings with local resident groups, organisations and stakeholders;

• Three events for local businesses;

• An update of the project website to provide details about the Hybrid Planning Applications with frequently asked questions (FAQs), a Hybrid Planning Applications User Guide and all documents available to view; and

• Continued monitoring of the project information email and phone enquiry service, responding to questions relating to the proposals from 55 people

3.26 This engagement culminated in direct conversations with over 1,000 residents and members of the public.

3.27 The key comments raised/ feedback provided by the community as part of the direct engagement carried out by the Applicant can be summarised as follows:

• Accessing property specific daylight/ sunlight information;

• Impact on the public transport network and local stations;

• Understanding how the proposed built form differs from the Consented Scheme and the previously existing buildings on the Site;

• Estate management and maintenance;

• Community benefits;

• Affordability of proposed homes, retail and services;

• Jobs and opportunities for local people; and

• Construction related impacts and management

Planning Authority, Statutory Consultee and Key Stakeholders

3.28 The Hybrid Planning Applications were validated on 17 September 2024. The RBKC and LBHF statutory consultation period concluded on Friday 11 October and Monday 25 November 2025 respectively.

3.29 Engagement was undertaken with RBKC, LBHF, GLA and TfL from September 2024 to July 2025

3.30 In addition, the following statutory bodies and stakeholders were consulted: Historic England; Royal Parks; Health and Safety Executive; Network Rai ; London Underground Limited; Secured by Design; and Thames Water

3.31 Table 3A.1A provides a snapshot summary of key comments made by the boroughs and responses provided throughout the post-application submission period Further detail is provided in the DAS Addendum.

3.32 For consistency with the July 2024 ES, the feedback has been summarised and grouped within the following four themes:

• Nature and Park - How the approach to open space and ecology has evolved;

• Movement and Hierarchy - How additional connections and the movement strategy were developed;

• Uses and Clusters - How the mix of residential, commercial and cultural uses were updated; and

• Density and Townscape Character - How several plots were updated

Table 3A 1A: Post-Application Submission Planning Authority, Statutory Consultee and Key Stakeholder Engagement Feedback Environmental Topics Considered Event Stakeholder

Open Space and Public Realm

Ecology and Connectivity

LBHF / RBKC postapplication design workshops

LBHF / RBKC Planning and Design Officers

Connectivity, Transport and Access

LBHF / RBKC postapplication design workshops

LBHF / RBKC Planning and Design Officers

TfL / LBHF / RBKC postapplication meetings

TfL / LBHF / RBKC Planning and Transport Officers

Comments and Responses

A series of design workshops were held and the following key topics were discussed:

• St Cuthberts Lane – RBKC identified the need to provide further clarity around the character of St Cuthberts Lane and its relationship with Warwick Lane In response to this, additional illustrative design studies were developed to explore how the quality of St Cuthbert’s Lane could be refined continue the character of Warwick Lane though continuous public realm treatment and active frontages. These studies enhanced the pedestrian-friendly character of St Cuthbert’s Lane and included widening of pavements, landscaped traffic-calming measures and exploring how the gap between Plots EC18 and EC19 could be reduced to increase the continuity of frontages. An additional Design Code was introduced (WC.L.28) to secure the proposed amendments

• West Brompton Square – RBKC identified the need to further consider the character of West Brompton Square in the context of the Brompton Cemetery, and the continuation of the SINC. Clarifications and illustrative design studies were provided to RBKC to demonstrate how West Brompton Square, and its surrounding context are brought together. This included how the square is activated and framed through ground floor uses and spill-out space, as well as how the character of Brompton Cemetery is responded to through the careful selection of planting and materials. Additional Design Codes were introduced (WB.L.32 and WB.L.33) to secure the proposed clarifications

A series of design workshops were held and the following key topics were discussed:

• Biodiversity and Play – RBKC and LBHF raised concerns about overlapping landscape and ecological functions in the Table Park and Aisgill Gardens. This was reviewed to create a better integration between biodiversity habitats and allocation of play space and how nature and play could co-exist. Additional illustrative design studies culminated in additional design codes being introduced to improve the clarity on the overlapping uses and informed the design evolution and approach to nature and play. Amendments included:

amendment of plant bed arrangements to minimise overlap with play space; reallocation of play space to be within the respective borough boundaries; allocation of undisturbed habitat areas within the Design Code; and An additional Design Code introduced (SW.L.168)

• Bioline – RBKC sought further consideration of the scenario where the Bioline (decking over the WLL Railway) is not delivered. With input from the Applicant’s ecologist, it was demonstrated how rail-side planting could be introduced to enhance the habitat of existing on-site SINCs and to increase ecological connectivity between the on-site and off-site SINCs. In addition, trees and low-level planting within West Brompton Square could frame the public space and create a green railway edge to provide connectivity to West Brompton Cemetery SINC. This is addressed through additional illustrative design studies and the introductory text for West Brompton Square in the Design Code was modified to take account of this scenario.

A series of design workshops were held and the following key topics were discussed:

• Plot EC20 – RBKC provided specific feedback in respect of Plot EC20 and the need for this plot to better connect to West Cromwell Road and St Cuthberts Lane and for consideration to be given to cycle and pedestrian connectivity. Additional illustrative design studies were developed to explore the potential connection within Plot EC20 for pedestrians and cyclists to connect to West Cromwell Road. An additional Design Code was introduced (WC.L.27).

• Indicative locations of access to the Site – LBHF raised concerns around vehicular access through the Gibbs Green and West Kensington Estates. Further discussion around access through the Estates resulted in changes to Parameter Plan 008 to limit access to pedestrian, cycle and emergency vehicles from Aisgill Avenue and Mund Street

• West Kensington Station Square – LBHF required further details of the potential of a public space adjacent to West Kensington Station. Additional illustrative design studies were undertaken to explore the delivery of a potential new square outside West Kensington Station, which is subject to third party agreements. This has been identified as an opportunity to deliver an enhanced and more generous public realm along North End Road and create a gateway space leading into Beaumont Avenue and the Proposed Development. As a result, further Design Codes were introduced (WK.L.43, WK.L.44, WK.L.45, WK.L.46, WK.L.47, WK.L.48, WK.L.49, WK.L.50)

• Cluny Mews connection – RBKC sought further details of the potential Cluny Mews pedestrian and cycle connection. Additional illustrative design studies were undertaken to explore the enhancement to the potential connection with a more positive interface with the adjacent church and completed residential development church interface and legible pedestrian and cycle connection, subject to third party agreements As a result, Design Codes WC.L.26 was amended.

• Warwick Square – RBKC raised concerns about how buildings responded to Warwick Square at the ground level. Additional illustrative design studies were undertaken to explore the public realm activation principles around Warwick Square, demonstrating how ground floor uses, spill-out space, and landscaping collectively contribute to framing and animating the space. As a result, Design Code WB.B.12 was amended to reflect design studies

• Empress Place Passage – LBHF required further details of Empress Place Passage. Additional illustrative design studies were undertaken to explore the public realm around Empress Place Passage and to provide additional detail and clarifications in respect of the following:

Arrangement of the taxi rank and bus layover space;

Layout and arrangement of the passage;

Pedestrian, cycle and emergency vehicle access arrangements through the passage; and Quality of finishes that enhance the character and functionality of the space.

Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution

Table 3A 1A: Post-Application Submission Planning Authority, Statutory Consultee and Key Stakeholder Engagement Feedback Environmental Topics Considered Event Stakeholder Key Comments and Responses

As a result, additional illustrative design material was produced.

• Warwick Road cycle lane – has been removed from the development proposals on the basis an alternative north south connection can be achieved within the Site. These are allowed for within plot EC20 and to Cluny Mews.

Land Use LBHF / RBKC postapplication meetings LBHF / RBKC Planning Officers / GLA

Density and Townscape Character LBHF / RBKC postapplication design workshops

LBHF / RBKC Planning and Design Officers / Historic England/ GLA/ Royal Parks

A series of land use workshops were held and the following key topics were discussed:

• Residential Minimum / Commercial Maximum – LBHF and GLA sought an uplift in the C3 residential minimum in LBHF. This culminated in the LBHF C3 residential minimum increasing from 1,600 to 2,000 units. This results in a consequential reduction in the maximum commercial floorspace in LBHF from 175,000 m2 GEA to 155,000 m2 GEA.

• Alternative Illustrative Design Studies – LBHF and RBKC sought further clarity on how alternative predominant uses could be delivered within the scope of the Design Code. Further illustrative design studies were undertaken to explore alternative predominant land uses, plot layouts and capacities to clarify how the Illustrative Masterplan has informed the Development Specification. These studies are included in the Addendum DAS.

• Hotel – Feedback from RBKC around Warwick Square, the ‘arrival’ to Earls Court and the importance of the culture function informed testing of alternative uses within EC04 Further plot testing was undertaken in respect of Plot EC04 and how to strengthen the building’s visual prominence and reinforce its cultural use, particularly in views from Earl’s Court Station and the Table Park. The option to deliver a hotel use in Plot EC04 was introduced to the ground level land use parameter plan and the Development Specification along with an increase in the number hotel rooms from 150 to 200 in RBKC

A series of design workshops were held and the following key topics were discussed:

• Plots EC03 and EC10 – Feedback from RBKC, Historic England, GLA and Royal Parks raised concerns regarding design proposals for Plots EC03 and EC10 and the potential impacts to the setting of Brompton Cemetery within short and mid-range views. In particular, the potential perceived monolithic appearance of the Proposed Development was raised Extensive design testing was undertaken to explore opportunities for betterment. Key amendments are summarised below: The maximum parameter envelope of Plot EC03 was amended to reduce the height by one storey, creating a more gradual transition in scale which has been captured in the maximum height parameter plan.

Further articulation to the façade and roofline was introduced through amended illustrative designs to better reflect the finer urban grain of the local context, while setbacks on the upper floors were introduced to reduce the perceived length and monolithic appearance of the Plot EC03 building. This has been captured through additional Design Codes SW.B.23 and amendment to Design Code WB.B.30

Illustrative design proposals for Plot EC10 were amended to reduce the perceived length of the built form and introduce additional articulation as seen from key views, including those from Penywern Road and Brompton Cemetery. A break in the top of the built form was introduced to address the monolithic appearance, with design principles captured in updates to the Design Code (WB.B.30). Further stepping and facade definition has been introduced that allows the building to read as three distinct elements, while incorporating architectural articulation and rhythm that respond to the finer urban grain of the local context. Careful selection of materials and tones could create a clearly legible layering of façades that complement the existing foreground buildings in the identified townscape views.

The cumulative impact of the updated illustrative design proposals was tested in key views from Brompton Cemetery. The updated views demonstrated how the amendments provide an improved response to the setting and reduce the perceived impact on heritage assets.

• Empress Place Cluster – LBHF and RBKC raised concerns around the complexity of the massing of plots within the Empress Place cluster. Alternative illustrative designs were developed for Plots WB01,02 and WB07,08 to address feedback on the perceived monolithic appearance from selected east-west townscape views. These were developed in conformity with the previously submitted design codes to demonstrate how the massing could be refined through the detailed design process. The alternative illustrative design proposals demonstrated how each plot could be articulated individually to break up and simplify the built form, while maintaining a cohesive family of buildings. As a result, sitewide Design Code SW.B.23 was added to address the length of the facades and a new code added EP.B.14 for Plots WB07 and 08

• Plots WK02 – LBHF raised concerns around the impact of Plot WK02 on the daylight and sunlight of Kensington Hall Gardens. Further massing studies were undertaken which comprised setbacks of the massing at three distinct levels. As a result, the maximum height parameter plan was updated to adjust the massing of Plot WK02 to address concerns around sunlight, daylight and overshadowing and impacts on Kensington Hall Gardens

• Detailed Component – LBHF, RBKC, GLA and the HSE made comments on the Detailed Component plots. This feedback combined with updates to fire safety regulations resulted in updates to all the detailed plot proposals to ensure compliance. Amendments to the detailed plots comprised, for example:

Amended core arrangements to accommodate additional smoke shafts;

Introduction of second staircases;

Review of entrance/exit door arrangements; and

Re-arrangement of podium and terrace public realm spaces to be located within the defined distance (18 m) to exits These amendments are reflected in the amended planning application drawings and Detailed Component DAS Addendums.

3.34

Illustrative Masterplan Evolution

3.33 A holistic approach to modelling and testing has continued throughout the post-application submission design response period This process was an extension of the design evolution process undertaken at the pre-application submission stage. Therefore, the starting point for these amendments was the ‘Stage 3’ Illustrative Masterplan as presented within Table 3 3 of the July 2024 ES

Table 3A.2A: Post-Application Submission Summary of Illustrative Masterplan Evolution

Post-submission Stage: Refining the Masterplan

• Additional Design Code to ensure the residential character of St Cuthbert’s Lane

• Additional West Brompton Square Design Codes to ensure that the landscaping enhances the ecological corridor and respond to and aligns with Brompton Cemetery's character

• Amended and additional Design Codes to clarify the biodiversity and play space approach to integrated planting and play space, allowing these uses to co-exist and biodiversity to successfully thrive; to minimise overlap between functions; and well as to add areas of undisturbed ecological habitat).

• Additional Design Codes to address potential building maintenance issues in relation to close proximity existing trees

• Addition of a potential pedestrian and cycle access through Plot EC20 from St Cuthberts Lane to West Cromell Road and West Brompton with Parameter Plans, with additional Design Code

• Removal of vehicular access from Aisgill Avenue and Mund Street, with the exception of emergency access which is the intended use in the Parameter Plans

• New West Kensington character area Design Codes to provide design principles for a potential new Square outside West Kensington Station

• Enhancement of the potential pedestrian and cycle access to Cluny Mews, with amended Design Code

• Amendment to Design Codes relating to Warwick Square ground floor frontages and spill out spaces

• Addition of Design Codes to enhance the character of Empress Passage

• Removal of the Warwick Road Cycle Lane from the cycle movement strategy

• Reduction of long-stay cycle spaces from 8,464 to 8,394 and shortstay cycle spaces from 629 to 458

3.35 The post-application design evolution of the Detailed Component Plots are presented in the Detailed Component DAS Addendums. In summary, the proposed amendments comprise the following:

Table 3A.2A presents further design evolution carried out from Stage 3 to the post-application submission stage For consistency with the July 2024 ES, the design changes have been categorised into the key design moves: Nature and Park; Movement and Hierarchy; Uses and Clusters; and Density and Townscape.

• Increase in the LBHF C3 residential minimum from 1,600 to 2,000 units. This results in a consequential reduction in the maximum commercial floorspace in LBHF from 175,000 m2 GEA to 155,000 m2 GEA.

• Clarification regarding proposed land uses in each Development Zone

• Addition of Hotel use within Development Zone K, Retail (Food and Beverage (F&B) /Flexible Commercial, Cultural, Community use within Development Zone J and Retail/F&B/Flexible Commercial, Cultural and Leisure/Health use within Development Zone P

• Refinement of areas proposed in Development Zones to ensure alignment with maximum development caps, including changes to allowance for ancillary floorspace within Development Zones

• Increase in maximum Cultural floorspace cap in RBKC from 3,000 m2 GEA to 7,000 m2 GEA.

• Amendment of flexible land use design codes to provide clarity on design principles in the context of flexible use capacity

• Reduction of maximum building height in Development Zone F Plot EC03 by 3.5 m

• Amendment of design codes in respect of Plot EC10 to enhance built form articulation in response to townscape and heritage setting from key views

• Setback of Development Zone X Plot WK02 massing to the north (23.2 mAOD by 0.5 m; 28.1 mAOD by 4.5 m; 31.4 mAOD by 3.6 m)

• Introduction of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2 - 2.8 m) in Development Zones A, B and C

• Amendment of Cluny Mews built form design codes to clarify how buildings along Cluny Mews are articulated to create a synergy with the context, including the adjacent Cluny Mews development and St. Cuthbert's Church

• Addition of built form design codes to enhance articulation of built form and respond to finer urban grain where plots have the potential to present a monolithic form from key views

• Amendment of and new West Brompton Square design codes to enhance the synergy between active frontages and architectural elements (e.g. types of frontages / spill out space)

• Amendment of the Detailed Component (Plots EC05, EC06, WB03, WB04 and WB05) to account for the updated Fire Regulations (BS9991), in particular the introduction of a secondary escape stairwell and resultant amendments to core arrangement. This has resulted in amendments to:

Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution

fenestration;

building footprints at Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m, Plot WB04 by approximately 0.1 m and Plot WB05 by approximately 0.3 m;

internal reconfiguration of bin and cycle stores at ground floor level; residential layouts; two balconies at levels 1 and 2 and a terrace at level 7 at Plot EC05 (addition of); external amenity spaces at upper floor and roof level; landscaping proposals within Plot EC05 at level 04 and 08 and Plot WB04 at level 02.

• Increase in proposed floorspace in RBKC and LBHF Detailed Components to 136,669 m2 GEA;

• Reduction in number of residential units proposed by the LBHF Detailed Component from 462 to 456;

• Change in residential unit and tenure mix;

• Increase of long-stay cycle spaces from 1,922 to 1,917 and short-stay cycle spaces from 188 to 224 n the Amended Detailed Component; and

• Amendment to below ground level depth at Plot EC06 from 4.8 mAOD to 5 mAOD

Key Design and Environmental Considerations

3.36 Throughout the post-planning submission stage the design has focussed on townscape, visual, built heritage, daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, ecology, biodiversity, open space, public realm and transport and accessibility environmental considerations.

Summary of Environmental Considerations

3.37 Table 3.3 of the July 2024 ES remains valid for the pre-application submission stage.

3.38 Table 3A 3A presents a comparison of key environmental effects between the Stage 3 Finalised Masterplan and the post-application submission Amended Masterplan

Table 3A 3A: Post-Application Submission Environmental Effect Comparison

Environmental Effect Finalised Masterplan (Stage 3) March 2024 Amended Masterplan (post-application submission) June 2025

Townscape, Visual and Built Heritage

Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing

• Number of tall buildings in Empress State Building (ESB) cluster reduced from five to three improving setting and view impacts.

• Single landmark tower of high quality architectural design, reducing the coalescence in long distance views of the tall building cluster and creating a clearer reading of the skyline.

• Total development footprint reduced by 10 %.

• Increased permeability and gaps between buildings for improved daylight and sunlight performance to neighbours and on-site open space.

• Opening up of open space as continuous network.

• Further refinement of stepped massing with building heights reduced along Beaumont Avenue, Philbeach Gardens, Aisgill Avenue, Eardley Crescent and Empress Place to improve the daylight, sunlight and overshadowing on existing sensitive receptors and new on-site sensitive receptors.

• Plot EC03 reduced by 1 storey in height

• Plot EC10 Design Code introduced to require a break

• Additional Design Codes result in betterment of townscape views from Brompton Cemetery and Conservation Areas to the east.

• Plot EC03 reduced by 1 storey in height.

• Plot WK02 reduced in depth horizontally.

• Results in betterment of daylight, sunlight and overshadowing within and outwith the Amended Proposed Development

Table 3A 3A: Post-Application Submission Environmental Effect Comparison

Environmental Effect Finalised Masterplan (Stage 3) March 2024 Amended Masterplan (post-application submission) June 2025

Wind • Tall buildings adjacent to the ESB reduced from five to three reducing wind channelling speeds.

• Improved spatial connectivity across the Site allowing for less constrained wind movement.

Public Realm, Open Space, Ecology and Connectivity

• Open space increased by 20 %.

• Connections to Earl’s Court and West Brompton stations strengthened through an integrated open space offering, increasing permeability and accessibility across the Site.

• Potential pedestrian and ecological link from West Brompton Station to the Table Park introduced (the ‘Bioline’), creating an ecological corridor to off-site habitats.

• Footprint of Lillie Sidings Square extended and the cascades introduced to increase connectivity between this square and the Table Park and address the level changes between these areas, creating and inclusive and accessible public realm.

Preferred Option

• No amendments proposed

• Additional Design Codes ensure ecological corridors between on-site and off-site SINCs are strengthened and additional low level planting within West Brompton square would be provided to increase connectivity

• Additional separation between biodiversity and habitats and play space including allocation of undisturbed habitats.

3.39 The reasons for the selection of the preferred option as presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. The post-application submission Amended Illustrative Masterplan is a refinement of the Stage 3 illustrative Masterplan preferred option and does not alter the preferred option reasons previously provided.

Conclusion

3.40 The pre-application submission design evolution and engagement process as presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development

3.41 The post-application submission design evolution has been informed by LPA, consultee, stakeholder and community feedback and engagement, as well as technical and environmental testing.

3.42 The proposed amendments have focussed on townscape and visual, built heritage, daylight, sunlight and overshadowing, ecology and biodiversity, open space and public realm and transport and accessibility considerations

3.43 The proposed amendments do not alter the reasons for the selection of the preferred option as presented in the July 2024 ES.

4A AMENDED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION

Introduction

This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum provides a description of the Amended Proposed Development for the purposes of identifying and assessing the additional or different potential environmental impacts and likely environmental effects of the Amended Proposed Development in the technical assessments of ES Volume 1A (Chapters 6A-17A), ES Volume 2A (Chapters 1A-2A) and discrete reports in ES Volume 3A

This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 4: Proposed Development Description of the July 2024 ES. The majority of the document remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but it has been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

The introduction of the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However:

• the Site is described in ES Chapters 1 and 1A: Introduction, with more detailed descriptions provided in each technical assessment within ES Volumes 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 3 and 3A;

• the demolition and construction works of the Amended Proposed Development are described in ES Chapters 5: Demolition and Construction Description and 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description;

• further information on the Amended Proposed Development can be found in the July 2024 Hybrid Planning Applications documents, as well as the following 2025 Replacement and Addendum Hybrid Planning Application documents:

Replacement Documents:

Control Documents for the Amended Outline Component: Development Specification; Parameter Plans; Design Code;

Addendum Documents:

Design & Access Statement Volume 1: Outline Component Addendum (‘DAS’);

Design & Access Statement Volume 2: RBKC Detailed Component Addendum

Design & Access Statement Volume 3: LBHF Detailed Component Addendum Arboricultural Impact Assessment Addendum; Transport Assessment Addendum; Framework Delivery and Servicing Plan Addendum

Operational Waste Management Plan Revision 01; Sustainability Strategy Addendum; Statement of Community Involvement Addendum; Energy Strategy Addendum;

Circular Economy Assessment Addendum;

Whole Life Carbon and Circular Economy Strategy Addendum; and Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy Addendum.

Planning Applications

The description of the Proposed Development on the Hybrid Planning Application forms as presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

The summary description remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of the updated reference to Figure 4A.1R and Figure 4A.2R

In respect of the Detailed Component, the predominant and other uses presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the total floorspace has increased from 133,519 m2 to 135,031 m2 (GEA) to be delivered above and below ground level in buildings ranging in height between 3 (20.1 m AOD) and 42 (158 m AOD) storeys above typical ground level.

In respect of the Outline Component, the development zone uses, maximum floorspace and maximum storey heights, control documents and parameters presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. Additional reference should be made to Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

The amended Parameter Plans presented within this ES chapter in replacement figures are summarised in Table 4A.1A

Table 4A.1A: Schedule of Amended Parameter Plans

Dwg Number

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-004 Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Plan

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-005 Proposed Plot Plan

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-013 Proposed Land Use Below Ground Floor

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-011 Proposed Land Use Ground Level

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-012 Proposed Land Use Upper Levels

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-006 Proposed Maximum Heights Plan

EC.PA.B Parameter Plan-008 Proposed Access and Movement Plan

4A.23R

4A 24R

4A 44R

The reliance on assumptions and development scenarios considered, remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Site Arrangement

The Site arrangement as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development The amended composite plans are presented in Figure 4A 1R and Figure 4A.2R respectively.

Figure 4A.1R: Amended Proposed Early Phases Development Scenario Site Arrangement

Figure 4A.2R: Amended Proposed All Phases Development Scenario Site Arrangement

Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description

Land Use Area Schedule

The amended area schedule for the Amended Proposed Development is presented in Table 4A 3R for the Early Phases and Table 4A 4R for the All Phases development scenarios. These include the amended breakdown of assumed minimum and maximum floorspace areas by residential and non-residential use class which could be brought forward within the Amended Outline Component.

Table 4A.3R: Proposed Early Phases Area Schedule

With regard to the Outline Component, the maximum floorspaces areas and rationale for minimum assumed floorspace areas as presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Table 4A 4R: Proposed All Phases Area Schedule

Table 4A 4R: Proposed All Phases Area Schedule

floorspace for incidental purposes linked to the land uses in the table.

Residential Uses

The Amended Proposed Development would deliver a range of residential uses. Table 4A.5A presents the amended proposed maximum residential offer.

Table 4A.5A: Amended Proposed Maximum Residential, Hotel, Co-living, Older Persons

and Purpose

Table 4A.6Apresents the amended assumed minimum residential units, to enable a reasonable worst-case assessment.

Table 4A 6A: Amended Assumed Minimum Residential Units

Early Phases

The amended proposed maximum Early Phases C3 residential unit and tenure mix for the Amended Detailed Component and the amended assumed

and

for the Amended

is presented in Table 4A.7A

Table

All Phases

The

Land Use Distribution

The summary of land use distribution presented in the July 2024 remains materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However updated floorplans and parameter plans are described in the following sub-sections.

Early Phases

Detailed Component

The summary description of the Detailed Component presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Plots EC05 and EC06

The three lower levels of Plots EC05 and EC06 and predominant uses as presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for these plots, with the exception of the basement level of Plot EC06 which would be +5 mAOD. Both plots would provide amended core arrangements, including additional/amended stairwells and exits to comply with Fire Safety Regulations.

Basement Layout

The amended Plot EC05 and Plot EC06 basement layout is presented in Figure 4A.3R

The Plot EC05 basement level would incorporate amended core arrangements Some of the cycle storage previously located at GF would be relocated to basement level. Additional refuse floorspace would be provided, facilitating an increased capacity to the loading bay collection area and resulting in reduced basement residential amenity area.

The Plot EC06 basement level would incorporate amended core arrangements including an additional emergency escape route. The refuse and bulky waste storage floorspace would be increased. The plant room would be increased to incorporate additional space for a partial mezzanine within the basement level for life safety plant.

Ground Floor Layout

The amended Plot EC05 and Plot EC06 ground floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.4R.

Between the mezzanine and ground floor level, an additional emergency escape route through the previously proposed ground floor cycle store, would be provided

The Plot EC05 ground floor would incorporate amended core arrangements including an additional emergency escape route. A back-of-house area for additional food and beverage (F&B) floorspace would be provided at ground level.

The Plot EC06 ground floor would incorporate amended core arrangements. An emergency generator plantroom and a new cycle store would face the crescent. The previously proposed core to the nursery and Northern Access Road would be removed.

Figure 4A.3R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Basement General Arrangement Plan

First Floor Layout

The amended Plot EC05 and Plot EC06 first floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.5R.

The Plot EC05 first floor layout would incorporate amended core arrangements including an additional emergency escape route. There would be three independent final exits for the three stairwells, (one of which would provide fire brigade access), an amended residential unit layout, unit size mix and wheelchair accessible allocation.

The Plot EC06 first floor layout would incorporate amended core arrangements including an additional emergency escape route, as well as an updated cycle store layout with access from the main core, a fire brigade access from Table Park level, two independent final exits for the two stairwells and a new refuse store for the nursery at Table Park level.

Second and Third Floor Layout

The amended Plot EC05 and Plot EC06 second and third floor layouts are presented in Figure 4A.6R.

The Plot EC05 second and third floor layouts would incorporate amended core arrangements including an additional emergency escape route, amendments to the residential unit size mix at the lower levels, residential unit layout, wheelchair accessible allocation and amendments to the roof amenity due to escape distances constraints on the third floor. One additional balcony would be provided on the second floor along the eastern façade.

The Plot EC06 second and third floors would incorporate amended residential layouts and additional wheelchair accessible allocation on the second floor.

Figure 4A.4R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Ground Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.5R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 First Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.6R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Second Floor General Arrangement Plan

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description

Typical Upper Floor Layout

The amended Plot EC05 and Plot EC06 typical upper floor layouts are presented in Figures 4A.7R and 4A.8R

The Plot EC05 upper floor layouts would incorporate an amended core arrangement including an additional emergency escape route, amendments to the residential unit size mix, residential unit layout, wheelchair accessible allocation and amendments to the roof amenity at level 7 due to escape distances constraints.

The Plot EC06 typical upper floors would incorporate amended residential layouts as a result of the updated core layout

and Roof Layouts

The amended Plot EC05 roof terraces at levels 03 and 07, comprising communal residential open space, are presented in Figures 4A.9R and 4A.10R.

Figure 4A 7R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Typical Upper Floor General Arrangement Plan L04-L06 Podium

Figure 4A.8R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Typical Upper Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A 9R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 L03 General Arrangement Plan

4A.10R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 L07 General Arrangement Plan

The amended Plot EC05 and EC06 podium and roof layouts are presented in Figure 4A.11R. The Plot EC06 roof layout would incorporate a repositioned dry air cooler.

Plot WB03

The Plot WB03 summary land uses presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid. The plot would provide amended core arrangements including amended stairwells and exits to comply with Fire Safety Regulations.

Lower Ground Floor Layout

The amended WB03 lower ground floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.12R The amended core arrangements would include redesigned fire-fighting and evacuation staircases (increased widths and amended orientation in the south) which would lead to dedicated protected lobbies and dedicated fire escape routes at ground floor level exiting to the south and north of the main entrance, respectively. The two dedicated lift lobbies would be separated by hold open doors.

Figure 4A.12R: Amended Proposed Plot WB03 Lower Ground Floor General Arrangement Plan Ground Floor Layout

The amended WB03 lower ground floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.13R. In addition to the amended core and staircase arrangements, access would be provided through an enlarged main entrance door. The reconfigured cycle storage would provide double stacked cycle parking racks on mezzanine level, accessed via steps with an adjacent bike channel or cycle lift.

First Floor Layout

The amended Plot WB03 first floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.14R and would include amended core arrangements.

Typical Upper Floor Layout

The amended Plot WB03 typical upper floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.15R. The amended core arrangements would incorporate a dedicated lift lobby to the second escape stairwell, with a dedicated smoke shaft. Two separate corridors, each ventilated with dedicated smoke shafts, would be provided. Re-arranged risers would accommodate the increase in shafts.

Figure

Figure 4A.11R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Roof General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.15R: Proposed Plot WB03 Typical Upper Floor General Arrangement Plan Podium and Roof Layout

The July 2024 ES stated two communal roof terraces would be provided on the 31st floor; however, these would be provided on the 32nd floor The general arrangement of the two communal roof terraces remains materially valid.

Plot WB04

In respect of Plot WB04, the summary descriptions and general arrangement and plans presented in the July 2024 ES remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development. Updated general arrangement plans have been provided for completeness.

Lower Ground Floor Layout

The amended Plot WB04 ground floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.16R, incorporating the amended fire-fighting access and fire escape routes via the lower ground floor post room and staff welfare room.

Figure 4A.13R: Amended Proposed Plot WB03 Ground Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.13R: Amended Proposed Plot WB03 First Floor General Arrangement Plan

The amended Plot WB04 ground floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.17R The amended core arrangements would include two staircases with dedicated protected lobbies. A dedicated fire escape route would be provided

The residential entrance from Empress Place boulevard would be framed by two fire escapes. The fire-fighting staircase would connect to a dedicated escape route that would exit to the north of the main entrance. The evacuation staircase would connect via a protected lobby to an escape route that would exit to the south of the lobby.

Improved access would be provided through a 2 m wide main entrance door. A pram and scooter store would be located close to the main entrance core. Cycle lockers would also be included within the central cycle store.

The amended Plot WB04 first floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.18R. The amended core arrangements would include two staircases.

The amended WB04 typical upper floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.19R. As part of the amended core arrangements, a fire escape route would be introduced from the podium at level 2 into the second escape stairwell. This addition would result in the displacement of two studios from level 02 to level 16 and amendment of the podium landscaping at level 02. The amended core layout would remain consistent across all residential levels, with the exception of a minor reduction of the building services at the uppermost levels, to allow for storage areas within the units to be maximised.

Figure 4A.16R: Amended Proposed Plot WB04 Lower Ground Floor General Arrangement Plan

Ground Floor Layout

Ground Floor Layout

Typical Upper Floor Layout

Figure 4A.17R: Amended Proposed Plot WB04 Ground Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.18R: Amended Proposed Plot WB04 First Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.19R: Amended Proposed Plot WB04 Typical Upper Floor Arrangement Plan

Plot WB05

In respect of Plot WB05, summary descriptions and general arrangement plans presented in the July 2024 ES remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development. The plot would provide amended core arrangements including amended stairwells and exits to comply with Fire Safety Regulations. Updated general arrangement plans have been provided for completeness.

Ground Floor Layout

The amended Plot WB05 ground floor layout is presented in Figure 4A.20R Each staircase would have a dedicated protected lobby with hold open doors and a dedicated fire escape route leading directly outside at ground floor level. Separation would be provided between ancillary spaces at ground level and fire escape routes by lobbies.

Improved access to cycle storage would be provided by adequate aisle width and increased door width (to 2 m). The amended cycle store layout within T2 would allow access from Aisgill Garden.

The refuse store at ground floor level would continue to be accessible for residents from the core facing to the courtyard, to facilitate easy bin travel paths to the collection point.

Upper Floor Layout

The amended Plot WB05 typical upper layout is presented in Figure 4A.21R. In response to the amended core arrangements, the residential layout and orientation of 3 bedroom units at typical upper floors would be amended. Within T1, additional windows would be provided allowing for more light, views and ventilation within the apartments.

Roof Layout

The Plot WB05 roof layout remains materially valid. The amended plan is presented in Figure 4A.22R.

Figure 4A.20R: Proposed Plot WB05 Ground Floor General Arrangement Plan

Typical

Figure 4A.21R: Amended Proposed Plot WB05 Typical Upper Floor General Arrangement Plan

Figure 4A.22R: Amended Proposed Plot WB05 Roof General Arrangement Plan

Outline Component

The summary description presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid for the Amended Outline Component. Amendments made to the parameter plans are summarised in ES Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution.

The amended parameter plans are presented in Figures 4A.23R-4A.27R, followed by updated development zone information

Figure 4A.23R: Amended Proposed Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Parameter Plan

Figure 4A.24R: Amended Proposed Plot Parameter Plan

Figure 4A 25R: Amended Proposed Below Ground Floor Parameter Plan

Figure 4A.26R: Amended Proposed Land Use Ground Level Parameter Plan

Figure 4A.27R: Amended Proposed Land Use Upper Levels Parameter Plan

In respect of the Proposed Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm Parameter Plan (Figure 4A.23R), the limits of deviation in Development Zones A, B and C would allow for a plus/minus 2-2.8 m deviation.

In respect of Proposed Plot Parameter Plan (Figure 4A.24R), the following amendments have been made:

• Development Zone G: Plot WB10 amended to Plot WB11;

• Development Zone I: introduction of Plot WB12; and

• Development Zone P: introduction of Plot WB13.

In respect of the Land Use Parameter Plans (Figure 4A.25R - Figure 4A.27R), the land uses for the Early Phases Development Zones presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Furthermore, n response to local planning authority post-application submission comments, the Land Use Parameter Plans have been amended to provide clarity on which uses are predominant and other uses in line with the Development Specification. The amendments are summarised in the below sub-sections:

Development Zone G

Other uses also comprise ancillary buildings and structures (Sui Generis)

Development Zone F

Predominant uses also comprise education.

Development Zone K

The predominant land use has been amended with the addition of hotel use to the flexible types of floorspace use.

Development Zone P

Other uses would also comprise ancillary buildings and structures (Sui Generis)

Development Zone R

Other uses would also comprise community/social infrastructure.

All Phases

The Detailed Component would remain as reported for the Early Phases in the July 2024 ES, but updated in the above sections

In respect of the All Phases Development Zones, the Outline Component would remain as reported for the Early Phases in the July 2024 ES but updated in the above sections

The land uses presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development but updated in the above sections and noting amendments to Development Zone V2 as discussed below.

Development Zone V2

The predominant use would also comprise storage and distribution.

Other uses would also comprise residential and/or purpose-built student accommodation and/or co-living and/or older persons housing and storage and distribution.

Built Form, Height and Massing

The majority of proposed maximum heights as presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid, with the exception of the amended building heights presented in Table 4A.10A.

Table 4A.10A: Amended Proposed Maximum Zone/Plot Heights and Indicative Number of Storeys

Early Phases

Detailed Component

In addition, at Development Zone X, the Plot WK02 massing would be set back to the north as follows:

• 23.2 mAOD by 0.5 m;

• 28.1 mAOD by 4.5 m; and

• 31.4 mAOD by 3.6 m.

The amended Maximum Height Parameter Plan for the Amended Outline Component is presented in Figure 4A.28R.

Character Areas

The Character Areas presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Urban Design

The urban design parameter plan presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. The amended Urban Design Plan is presented in Figure 4A.29R

Figure 4A.28R: Amended Proposed Maximum Heights Parameter Plan

Figure 4A.30R: Proposed Urban Design Plan

Amended

Material Palette and Façade Detailing

The approach to material palette and façade detailing as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

The material palette and façade principles and detailing presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development The following proposed amendments are relevant to Plots EC05 and EC06, but would not alter the design principles presented in the July 2024 ES:

• The Plot EC05 fenestration (arrangement of windows) would align with the amended internal unit layouts (excluding townhouses) and two new balconies would be added at first and second floor level along the eastern façade. In addition, the Table Park entrance would align with the amended new final exit strategy.

• The Plot EC06 fenestration would align with additional plant requirements at Ground Floor.

Public Realm and Open Space Network

The areas of public realm and open space network to be delivered across the Amended Proposed Development for the Early and All Phases development scenarios as presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid with the exception of amended biodiverse roofs, amenity terraces and on-plot podium planting to be provided within the Amended Detailed Component as presented in Table 4A.11R.

Table 4A.11R: Amended Proposed Public Realm and Open Space Summary

Public realm key landscaped amenity open space (The Table Park, Aisgill Gardens and Lillie Sidings) (ha)

Trees (Detailed Component)

Trees (Outline Component based on assumptions drawn from the UGF illustrative landscape scheme)

Biodiverse roofs, amenity terraces and on-plot podium planting (Detailed Component) (ha)

Biodiverse roofs, amenity terraces and on-plot podium planting (Outline Component based on assumptions drawn from the UGF illustrative landscape scheme) (ha)

Early Phases

Detailed Component

In respect of the Detailed Component, the ground level public realm and open space, ground level communal residential space and communal podium/roof terraces presented in the July 2024 ES remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development However, proposed layout and planting amendments made in response to escape routes and access points required by Fire Safety Regulations are presented in Figures 4A.32R-4A.39R (erroneously referenced and numbered Figure 4.33-4.40 in the July 2024 ES)

It is noted that the planting amendments do not materially alter the basis of the assessment within the EIA and the BNG.

Figure 4A.32R: Amended Proposed Plots EC05 and EC06 Ground Floor Public Realm and Open Space

Figure 4A.33R: Amended Proposed Plot EC05 Ground Floor Residential Courtyard

In respect of Plot EC05, the communal podium/roof terrace on level 04 would comprise consolidated amenity and seating spaces, located within 18 m escape distance of the nearest exit. In addition, an increased planting buffer would be provided on the eastern side of the terrace. The amended layout is presented in Figure 4A.35R

The Plot EC05 communal podium/roof terrace on level 08 (Figure 4A.36R) would comprise an accessible area to the south and an inaccessible area to the north. The southern portion of the roof terrace would follow the same principles as set out in the July 2024 ES and would comprise a series of planted areas with integrated play, small seating areas and group spaces, located within 18 m escape distance to the nearest exit. The inaccessible areas would be optimised for urban greening, biodiversity and visual amenity with areas of biodiverse woodland groundcover mix planting.

Figure 4A.34R: Amended Proposed Plot WB05 Ground Floor Open Space

Figure 4A.35R: Amended Proposed Plot EC05 Communal Residential Terrace Level 04

Figure 4A.36R: Amended Proposed Plot EC05 Communal Residential Terrace Level 08

As shown in Figure 4A.38R, the amended Plot WB04 communal podium/roof terrace on level 02 would comprises a new path which would connect the podium garden to the additional fire escape route. In addition, an alternative fire egress route would be provided, linking the semi-circular terrace, booth seating, play areas and amenity lawn.

Figure 4A.39R: Proposed Plot WB04 Communal Residential Terraces Level 39 Private Balconies

In respect of the Amended Detailed Component, the balconies presented in the July 2024 ES remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, two additional balconies would be provided at levels 01 and 02 along the eastern façade of Plot EC05. A terrace would also be provided at level 07 of Plot EC05

Outline Component

The amended Maximum Building Zones and Public Realm Parameter Plan is presented in Figure 4A 23R. The minimum committed area of public realm remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

The amended Public Realm Typologies Plan is presented in Figure 4A.41R (erroneously numbered Figure 4.40 in the July 2024 ES). The accompanying summary presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. In respect of the proposed Bioline, it is noted that delivery is subject to 3rd party agreement. The Applicant is committed to deliver the enhancement of the existing on-site WLL SINCs in the event that the Bioline cannot be delivered. Existing vegetation would be removed and enhanced, as appropriate, with predominantly native species, subject to agreement of Network Rail.

Figure 4A.37R: Amended Proposed Plot WB03 Communal Residential Terraces Level 31

Figure 4A.38R: Amended Proposed Plot WB04 Communal Residential Terrace Level 02

Figure 4A 40R: Amended Proposed Public Realm Typologies Plan

Play Space

The play space strategy presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

The amended area of play space for the Detailed Component is presented in Table 4A.12R

Table 4A.12R: Detailed Component Play Space

Landscape and Biodiversity Strategies

The landscape and biodiversity strategies presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development This also applies to the UGF Illustrative Scheme prepared in July 2024.

The biodiversity strategy for the Amended Proposed Development comprises areas of undisturbed habitats, which would have minimal overlap with human uses, prioritising planting and habitat creation. The Amended Proposed Development Biodiversity Strategy is presented in Figure 4A.41R.

Lighting Strategy

The Site-wide lighting strategy presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development The footnote reference for the Institute of Lighting Professionals (ILP) guidance document PLG05: 2023 – The Brightness of Illuminated Advertisements and Digital Displays has been updated1

Access

Pedestrian and Cycle Access Early Phases

Detailed Component

The pedestrian and cycle access strategy for the Detailed Component presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

The amended Access and Movement Parameter Plan is presented at Figure 4A.44R.

Outline Component

The pedestrian and cycle access points for the Outline Component presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following:

• Removal of access point on Aisgill Avenue, south of Development Zone I;

• Addition of potential access point from West Cromwell Road in the north-east;

• Amendment of intended access point from the Northern Access Road to Cluny Mews to a potential access point; and

• Addition of service routes to Development Zones K and F

All Phases

Detailed Component

The pedestrian and cycle access strategy for the Detailed Component presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Outline Component

The pedestrian and cycle access points for the Outline Component presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid, with the exception of the following in addition to the Early Phases:

• Removal of pedestrian only access at Aisgill Avenue, north of Development Zone P;

• Amendment of intended access point at Mund Street School site to potential access point;

• Amendment of pedestrian access point at Gibbs Green Close to potential pedestrian access point;

• Addition of a pedestrian access to the north of North End Road, south of West Kensington Station;

• Amendment of two intended access points from A4 West Cromwell Road to potential access points

Figure 4R 44A: Amended Proposed Development Access and Movement Parameter Plan

Vehicular Access

The summary presented in the July 2024 ES, including the taxi strategy, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

The amended Proposed Development Access and Movement Parameter Plan is presented at Figure 4A.44R.

Early Phases

Detailed Component

EC05 and EC06

The vehicular access strategy for Plots EC05 and EC06 presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of additional emergency service access from Old Brompton Road

Refuse collection, move-in/move-out and large goods delivery would be provided from the Northern Access Road where loading bays are proposed to serve Plot EC05 and Plot EC06, with the exception of the two townhouses The townhouses would be serviced directly from Warwick Crescent.

WB03, WB04 and WB05

The vehicular access strategy for Plots WB03, WB04 and WB05 presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of amendments to the location of waste refuse collection

Outline Component

The vehicular access points (including Logistics Hub and Lillie Road Bus Layover) for the Outline Component presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following:

• Removal of vehicular access point from Aisgill Avenue (with the exception of emergency vehicles);

• Addition of service routes to Development Zones K and F; and

• Clarification of all emergency service access points.

All Phases

The vehicular access strategy for the Detailed Component presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the amendments presented for Early Phases above.

Outline Component

The vehicular access points (including the Road-to-Rail) for the Outline Component presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following (in addition to the Early Phases updates above):

• Removal of the vehicular access point at Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue

Emergency Access

Emergency vehicle access presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. Figure 4A.44R clarifies the relevant emergency access points.

Building Access

Building access presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Parking

Cycle Parking

Detailed Component

The Amended Detailed Component would comprise 1,917 long-stay cycle spaces:

• 572 spaces at Plots EC05 and EC06; and

• 1,345 spaces at Plots WB03, WB04 and WB05.

The Amended Detailed Component would comprise 224 short-stay cycle parking spaces:

• 110 spaces at Plots EC05 and EC06; and

• 114 spaces at Plots WB03, WB04 and WB05.

Outline Component

Indicatively 11,846 long-stay and 968 short-stay cycling spaces would be provided.

Vehicle Parking

The approach to vehicle parking presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Car Club

A maximum of 25 car club spaces would be provided for the Proposed Development, in addition to the 3 % minimum disabled parking provision and would comprise on-plot and on-street spaces.

Deliveries and Servicing

The general approach to deliveries and servicing as presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Detailed Component

Plots EC05 and EC06

A split servicing strategy is proposed with refuse collection and larger vehicles that service EC05 and EC06 from the Northern Access Road and smaller deliveries taking place on Warwick Crescent. The exception to this would be the two townhouses, which would be served directly from Warwick Crescent.

Plots WB03, WB04 and WB05

The servicing strategy for Plots WB03, WB04 and WB05 presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid, with the exception of the removal of further vehicle servicing from Aisgill Avenue for Plot WB05

Waste Management

The waste management strategy presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Waste Arisings

Detailed and Outline Component

The amended operational waste arisings for the Amended Proposed Development are presented in Table 4A 14R

Table 4A.14R: Amended Proposed Waste Arisings

*For the Outline Component, waste arisings have been assumed based on the illustrative scheme to provide an indication of the likely waste volumes.

Waste Facilities

Detailed Component

Table 4A 15R presents the types and number of bins that would be required to service the residential apartments of the Amended Proposed Development using the communal waste storage areas.

Table 4A.15R: Amended Proposed Detailed Component Residential Waste Container Requirements

The waste facilities presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of increased capacity to the bin store at Plot EC05 and new refuse store at Plot EC06.

Outline Component

The commercial waste strategy presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Commercial and Retail

Detailed Component

Table 4A 16R presents the commercial waste volumes for the Amended Proposed Development and Table 4A.17 presents the types and numbers of bins that would be required for commercial uses.

Table 4A 16R: Amended Proposed

*Restaurant use assumed as worst-case scenario

Table 4A.17R: Amended Proposed Detailed Component Commercial Bin Requirements

WB05

Tenant will provide own waste storage Flexible use Tenant will provide own waste storage

*Restaurant use assumed as worst-case scenario

**240 Litre Wheeled Bin

***360 Litre Wheeled Bin

****120 Litre Wheeled Bin

The waste management arrangements presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of Plot WB05 Community Use, where, on collection days, the commercial waste contractor appointed by the operator of the community areas would access the designated parking bay located on the service access road.

Proposed Development Energy Strategy

The energy strategy and ambient loop system presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description

Plant, Ventilation and Acoustic Design

The plant, ventilation and acoustic design presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Ventilation

The ventilation information presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Generators

Generator information presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Acoustic Design

Residential

Technical Appendix 11A.6R: Amended Site Suitability Assessment in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum would inform the detailed design of residential floorspace for the Amended Proposed Development

Utilities

The utilities presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Resources, Emissions and Residues

The resources, emissions and residues presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

The implementation of Be Lean, Be Clean and Be Green would result in carbon dioxide savings across the Amended Proposed Development as presented in Table 4A.19R.

Table 4A.19R: Amended Proposed Detailed Component Carbon Reductions

Proposed

Development Operational Provisions and Controls

The operational provisions and controls presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

With regards to emissions to air, the Amended Proposed Development would be all electric with no gas fired boilers or combined heat and power (‘CHP ) with the sole exception of life safety emergency back-up generation, which would be targeted for phasing out as technologies improve.

Proposed Development Sustainability

The sustainability strategy presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5A AMENDED DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION

DESCRIPTION

Introduction

5.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum presents the demolition and construction works associated with the Amended Proposed Development.

6.1 This chapter should be read in conjunction with ES Volume 1, Chapter 5: Demolition and Construction Description The majority of this document remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but has been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

5.2 Technical Appendix 5.1: Demolition and Construction Time Slices of the July 2024 ES is fully replaced by Technical Appendix 5A.1R in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum.

5.3 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Development Programme

5.4 The development programme and assumptions as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.5 However, the annual time slices have been updated to account for the removal of the Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue access and are presented in Technical Appendix 5A.1R, ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum

5.6 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, Figures 5.1-5.2 of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid and have not been updated for the sake of proportionality.

Interface with Key Stakeholders

5.7 The interface with key stakeholders as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.8 However, Thames Water issued their sitewide water demand modelling study in April 2025. The modelling confirms the following requirements for the Amended Proposed Development:

• Reinforcement/mains extension in Warwick Road - approximately 100 m of new main would need to be installed within Warick Road to connect to the nearby trunk main in Penywern Road.

• Reinforcement/mains extension needed in Aisgill Avenue - approximately 300 m of new main would need to be installed within A sgill Avenue to connect to the nearby trunk main in North End Road.

5.9 At the appropriate time, a formal application would be made to Thames Water for a new supply connection. Thames Water will then confirm and issue a design which would include the reinforcement works required. Any works required within the public highway would be undertaken alongside highway works as required prior to occupation of the relevant phase

5.10 Post-application submission consultation has been undertaken with London Heathrow Airport in respect of their navigational safeguarding requirements.

Infrastructure Works

5.11 The infrastructure works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.12 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, Figures 5.5 of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid and have not been updated for the sake of proportionality.

Enabling and Demolition Works

5.13 Enabling and demolition works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following proposed amendments:

• In respect of general site access, access/egress point 5 would no longer be possible from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue. The amended demolition and construction access routing is presented in replacement Figure 5A.6R; and

• In respect of cranes and hoists, a crane management strategy would be secured by means of an appropriately worded planning condition and agreed in post-application submission consultation with London Heathrow Airport

5.14 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, the parameter plans presented in Figures 5.7-5.9 of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid and have not been replaced for the sake of proportionality.

Earthworks, Piling and Substructure Works

5.15 The earthworks, piling and substructure works presented in the July 2024 ES remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.16 However, updated calculations have been undertaken of the earthworks. Account has been taken of the following proposed amendments to the building footprints and basement levels:

• Amended Detailed Component:

Amendments to the building footprints of Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and approximately 0.3 m respectively;

Amendments to the building footprint for Plot EC06 (extended to south-east to accommodate enlarged core) by 0.8 m; and

Amendment to the basement level of Plot EC06 from 4.8 m AOD to 5 m AOD.

• Amended Outline Component:

Addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m) at Development Zones A, B and C;

Amendment of below ground level at Development Zone N with an increase of 1,436 m2 to the west; Amendment of below ground level +1.6 mAOD at Development Zone O across a 300 m2 area; and Amendment of below ground level 0.5 mAOD at Development Zone Xarea with an increase of 344 m2 to the west.

5.17 The cut and fill assessment has considered the above changes to the parameter plans and been assessed with suitable allowance to excavate to a formation level.

5.18 The replacement Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Parameter Plan is presented in Figure 5A.10R.

Figure 5A.6R: Amended Proposed Demolition and Construction Access Routing

Figure 5A10R: Amended Proposed Site Levels Below Ground Floor Parameter Plan

Superstructure Works

5.19 The superstructure works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Envelope and Fit Out Works

5.20 The envelope and fit out works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.21 In respect of cranes and hoists, a crane management strategy would be secured by means of an appropriately worded planning condition and agreed in consultation with London Heathrow Airport

Public Realm and Landscaping Works

5.22 The public realm and landscaping works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Highways Works

5.23 The highways works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the amended access points are presented in Figure 5A.6R

Utilities and Service Installation Works

5.24 The utilities and service installation works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.25 However, in respect of potable water, Thames Water issued their sitewide water demand modelling study in April 2025. The modelling confirms the following requirements for the Amended Proposed Development:

• Reinforcement/mains extension in Warwick Road: - approximately 100 m of new main would need to be installed within Warick Road to connect to the nearby trunk main in Penywern Road.

• Reinforcement/mains extension needed in Aisgill Avenue - approximately 300 m of new main would need to be installed within Aisgill Avenue to connect to the nearby trunk main in North End Road.

5.26 At the appropriate time, a formal application would be made to Thames Water for a new supply connection. Thames Water will then confirm and issue a design which would include the reinforcement works required. Any works required within the public highway would be undertaken alongside highway works as required prior to occupation of the relevant phase

Demolition and Construction Vehicles and Plant

5.27 In respect of demolition and construction trips, Figures 5.11 and 5.12 of the July 2024 ES summarised the estimated monthly one-way peak demolition and construction vehicle movements per quarter for the Early Phases and for the All Phases development scenarios respectively. These numbers also include the estimated one-way peak daily average vehicle movements of both heavy goods vehicles (HGV) and light goods vehicles (LGV) for both scenarios over the duration of the demolition and construction works. A proportion of the HGV trips would be associated with the delivery of machinery and construction materials

5.28 Vehicle movements have been updated to account for the change in access points and earth works as presented in replacement Figures 5A.11R and 5A.12R.

Figure 5A 2R: Amended Indicative Early Phases Demolition and Construction Vehicles

Figure 5A 3R: Amended Indicative All Phases Demolition and Construction Vehicles

5.29 Peak demolition and construction traffic flows would occur in 2028 with a peak daily average of 90 one-way trips. Of this the peak daily HGV one-way trips would be 53 The daily peak is based on an average of 20 working days in a month. The peak demolition and construction traffic flows for Beaumont Avenue would be 40 one-way trips (21 HGVs) in 2039. This is anticipated to be the maximum difference between traffic flows associated with the Early and All Phases.

5.30 The most intensely used HGVs on-site would likely comprise tipper trucks for the removal of demolition and excavated material, ready-mix concrete trucks for the delivery of concrete and articulated lorries for the delivery of structural steel, façade and framing systems and pre-cast elements.

5.31 Typical construction plant and machinery as presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Construction and Contracting Strategy

5.32 The construction and contracting strategy presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.33 In respect of construction employment, given the early stage of the planning process, the indicative workforce presented in the Figure 5.13 and 5.14 graphs of the July 2024 ES is based on the experience of the Applicant’s construction advisor, taking into account construction cost, the complexity of the Site and the anticipated demolition and construction requirements. Estimates have been based on a traditional build-out, not accounting for modern methods of construction which may be incorporated in the final design and could therefore be considered an overestimate and the worst case likely maximum. A peak of 1,000 workers is expected per day based on Monday to Friday working.

Materials, Bulk Quantities and Waste

5.34 Information relating to materials and bulk quantities presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Waste Volumes and Management

5.35 The amended anticipated volumes of demolition and excavation waste to be generated by the Amended Proposed Development are presented in Table 5A.6R for the Early Phases and All Phases development scenarios.

Table 5A.6R: Amended Proposed Development Estimated Waste Arisings

Potential Environmental Impacts

5.37 The potential environmental Impacts presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Mitigation and Scope of Environmental Management Controls

5.38 The mitigation and scope of environmental management controls presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following:

• In respect of aviation, a crane management strategy would be secured by means of an appropriately worded planning condition and agreed in consultation with London Heathrow Airport

Deconstruction of Amended Proposed Development

5.39 The deconstruction information presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Cumulative Demolition and Construction Effects

5.40 Cumulative demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

5.41 The Applicant would seek to collaborate with the Mund Street and ESB cumulative schemes immediately to the west and south-west of the Site on aspects such as holding areas and shared services.

Summary

5.42 The summary presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following:

• The development programme for the Site comprises the demolition of the existing on-site buildings and the construction of the Amended Proposed Development as described in ES Chapter 4A: Proposed Development Description.

• The framework presented within this chapter is embedded mitigation and has formed the basis for the technical impact assessments presented in ES Chapters 6A-17A in this Volume, as well as in ES Volume 2A Chapters 1A2A.

Sensitive Receptors

5.36 Sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

6A ARCHAEOLOGY

Introduction

6.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely archaeology (buried heritage assets) effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different effects to those of the archaeological assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; below ground and building footprint proposals of the Amended Detailed Component; and below ground and development zone maximum horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component.

6.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 6: Archaeology and Volume 3, Technical Appendix 6.1: Archaeological Desk Based Assessment of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix A’ (e.g Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g Table 1A.1N).

6.3 This chapter is supported by the following amended technical appendix in ES Volume 3A Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Appendix 6A.1A: Earls Court Development Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Addendum.

6.4 The introduction presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid.

Methodology

6.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the archaeology assessment.

6.6 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

6.7 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking the assessment The adopted RBKC New Local Plan does not introduce any new considerations for the archaeology assessment

6.8 In respect of topic-specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

6.9 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

6.10 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of review comments and responses are provided in Technical Appendix 2A.10 in ES Volume 3A.

6.11 The Waterman post-submission review comments have not necessitated amendments to the assessment.

Assessment Scope

6.12 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Technical Scope

6.13 The technical scope remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the assessment presented in this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description

Spatial Scope

6.14 The spatial scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Temporal Scope

6.15 The temporal scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Characterisation Method

6.16 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

6.17 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

6.18 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment Criteria

6.19 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

6.20 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Conditions

6.21 The baseline conditions presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid with the exception of the following updates:

• Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, existing infrastructure has been utilised and no new infrastructure has been built. Therefore, the baseline conditions and sensitive receptors presented in the archaeological assessment of the July 2024 ES, remain materially valid as no new ground disturbance work has been undertaken.

• Up-to-date Greater London Historic Environment Record (GLHER) data is presented in the 2025 DBA Addendum (see ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum) for completeness.

• Two archaeological investigations have been added into the GLHER database and provide additional information on the nature of archaeological remains present within the study area The archaeological investigations identified post-medieval remains of low heritage significance only. These additional findings have not altered potential for and significance of archaeological remains within the Site. Therefore, the assessment of the on-site archaeological potential and significance presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

6.22 Figure 6A.1R presents the historic environment features within 1 km of the centre of the Site. Each known historic environment feature has been assigned a reference number in the figure, which correspond to the features listed in the gazetteer in Technical Appendices 6.1 and 6A.1A. The references noted as 94 and 95 indicate two additional archaeological investigations.

2 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan Review. Available at: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/planning-and-building-control/planning-policy/local-plan [accessed June 2025]

RAMBOLL

Figure 6A.1R: Amended Existing Historic Environment Features

Assessment of Effects

6.23 The assessment has considered the following proposed amendments:

• Detailed Component Plots layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

• Detailed Component Plot EC06 below ground level depth amendment from 4.8 mAOD to 5 mAOD;

• Outline Component Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

• Outline Component Development Zone O below ground level addition of +1.6 mAOD level across a 300 m2 area;

• Outline Component Development Zone N below ground level extension in area to the west by 1,436 m2;

• Outline Component Development Zone X 0.5 mAOD below ground level extension in area to the west by 344 m2; and

• Total excavation volume increase from 238,165 m3 to 328,941 m3

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

6.24 Whilst there would be small amendments to areas of excavation, ground reduction and disturbance, it is not considered that any amended archaeological effects would arise Accordingly, no additional or different effects to archaeological remains are considered likely to arise The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

6.25 Whilst there would be amendments to areas of excavation, ground reduction and disturbance, it is not considered that any amended archaeological effects would arise Accordingly, no additional or different effects to archaeological remains are considered likely to arise. The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

6.26 No additional mitigation is required and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

6.27 No additional mitigation is required and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Summary of Residual Effects

6.28 The summary of residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

6.29 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Summary of Assessment Post-Application Submission

6.30 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. None of these comments have necessitated changes to the assessment

6.31 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; below ground and building footprint proposals of the Amended Detailed Component; and below ground and development zone maximum horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component

6.32 In respect of baseline conditions, two archaeological investigations within the study area have been added into the GLHER database. These investigations identified post-medieval remains of low heritage significance only. These additional findings have not altered the potential for and significance of archaeological remains within the Site.

6.33 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of likely archaeology effects. Accordingly, the summary and conclusions presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

6.34 No additional or different significant archaeological effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

7A SOCIO-ECONOMICS

Introduction

7.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely socio-economic effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the socio-economic assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the land use floorspace area schedules and residential unit and tenure mix schedules of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components and their implications for housing delivery and employment, as well as population yield

7.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 7: Socio-Economics of the July 2024 ES. The majority of this document remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but it has been updated where required Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

7.3 The introduction text presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid.

Methodology

7.4 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the socio-economic assessment.

7.5 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the GLA s Accelerating Housing Delivery Planning & Housing Practice Note2, which was published in December 2024

7.6 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)3 was adopted on 24 July 2024. Policy ‘GB16 - Parks, Gardens and Open Spaces’ that was reported in the July 2024 ES chapter is now numbered ‘GB15 - Parks, Gardens and Open Spaces’ in the adopted RBKC New Local Plan (2024). Other than this change in policy numbering, the adopted RBKC New Local Plan contains no other changes of relevance to the socio-economic assessment.

7.7 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Consultation

7.8 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relating to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

7.9 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2A 10 of ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum

7.10 The Waterman post-application submission review comments have necessitated minor clarifications in the assessment, including the following:

• Clarification on the indicative minimum homes and PBSA delivery across LBHF and RBKC.

7.11 Stakeholder comments were provided by the NHS London Health Urban Development Unit (HUDU) and have been responded to under separate cover. A clarification update has been made to Table 7A.5A in response to the HUDU comments.

Assessment Scope

7.12 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

7.13 However, in response to the GLAs Accelerating Housing Delivery Planning & Housing Practice Note, a sensitivity test has been undertaken where all affordable housing is provided as social rent, with a reduced overall proportion of affordable housing for Phase 1 only

Baseline Characterisation Method

7.14 There is no material change to the baseline characterisation methods described in the July 2024 ES with the exception of the desk study undertaken for social infrastructure (education and primary healthcare)

7.15 The education baseline has been updated using the latest Annual Schools Census data (2025)4 and Published Admission Numbers (PAN) for state funded schools across LBHF and RBKC.

7.16 The primary healthcare baseline has been updated using the latest NHS England data on the number of registered patients and full time GPs at local practices5

7.17 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

7.18 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, however:

• The assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

• The worst-case scenarios considered to assess housing delivery, social infrastructure demand and employment creation have been updated to reflect the Amended Proposed Development as presented in Tables 7A.3R-7A.6R • The assessment method for local expenditure has also been updated to reflect latest available data.

Completed Development Stage

Housing Delivery

7.19 The amended indicative minimum residential homes and PBSA scenario used to assess housing delivery is presented in Table 7A 3R

Table 7A 3R: Amended Indicative Minimum Residential Homes and PBSA Scenario

Table 7A 3R: Amended Indicative Minimum Residential Homes and PBSA Scenario

Population Yield (GP, Education, Play Space, Social Infrastructure)

7.20 The indicative maximum residential unit mix scenario presented in Table 7.4 of the July 2024 remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development Whilst the unit mix of the homes for the Amended Detailed Component has changed, this is balanced within the Amended Outline Component meaning the overall indicative maximum unit mix for the Early Phases and All Phases considered in the July 2024 socio-economic assessment remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

7.21 The amended indicative maximum PBSA, Co-Living and older persons housing scenarios used to assess population yield and associated social infrastructure requirements are set out in Table 7A.5R which supersedes Table 7.5 in the July 2024 ES. The table has also been updated in response to post-submission comments from the NHS HUDU.

7.22 In respect of the Outline Component It should be noted that the residential homes, PBSA, Co-Living and older persons housing would not be all be delivered to their maximum. Population yield scenarios assessed in the ES therefore represent the worst-case, and in reality are likely to be lower. A more accurate estimate of population and associated infrastructure demands can be modelled at the RMA stage when detailed unit mix is known.

Table 7A.5R: Amended Maximum PBSA, Co-Living and Older Persons Housing Scenario

* The footprint of Plot WK06 extends slightly into RBKC therefore a small proportion of PBSA spaces (30 bedrooms) may fall within RBKC Maximum of 1,500 PBSA bedrooms under LBHF Hybrid Application only to be reached in the event that no PBSA bedrooms come forward in Development Zone V2 under RBKC Hybrid Application.

** Maximum of 1,000 Co-Living bedrooms under LBHF Hybrid Application only to be reached in the event that no Co-Living bedrooms come forward in Development Zone V2 under RBKC Hybrid Application.

7.23 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

7.24 The amended indicative minimum scenario for employment modelling is presented in Table 7A.6R which supersedes Table 7.6 in the July 2024 ES.

Table 7A 6R: Amended Indicative Minimum Scenario for Employment Modelling

*For Outline Component GIA assumed 92 % of GEA as set out in Chapter 4: Proposed Development Description, Volume 1

Local Expenditure

7.25 The assessment method for local expenditure has been updated to reflect latest available data, as follows:

• Household expenditure has been based on the latest regional average household expenditure of £230 per week for London (ONS Family Spending Survey 2024)6 This figure only includes spending which is likely to be local (i.e. food, drinks, tobacco, clothing, footwear, household goods and services, medicines, local recreation and culture) and excludes spending which is unlikely to be local (including transport, holidays, bills and insurance);

• The London mean student expenditure (excluding tuition and accommodation fees) of £7,988 annually7 applied in the 2024 July ES remains the latest available data. This figure only includes living costs which are likely to be local i.e. food, household goods, personal items and entertainment; and

• Local expenditure by additional employees is based on survey information carried out by research agency Loudhouse for Visa Europe (2014)8 – this survey focuses specifically on spending near place work After adjusting for inflation, the 2024 ES applied a number/cost of £14 per day per employee. Considering latest inflation rates this number/cost remains valid.

Cumulative Stage

7.26 The list of cumulative schemes remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development other than the addition of the Mund Street School site scheme which has been considered qualitatively in the cumulative effects section

Assessment Criteria

7.27 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

7.28 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Conditions

Existing Baseline

Existing Site

7.29 Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, the baseline conditions as described in the socio-economic assessment of the July 2024 ES remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Demographic, Labour Market, Employment, Housing and Deprivation Baseline

7.30 The demographic, labour market, employment, housing and deprivation baseline presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Social Infrastructure

Early Years Facilities

7.31 The baseline for early years facilities presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

7.32 RBKC has published a new Childcare Sufficiency Assessment (2023-24)9 There is sufficient childcare to meet childcare demands from families living in RBKC. The LBHF’s Childcare Sufficiency Assessment (2022-23)10 considered in the July 2024 ES remains the latest available. Therefore, the conclusion of the previous Childcare Sufficiency Assessment presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid

Primary Schools

7.33 There are 30 primary schools south of the A315– this remains as presented in the July 2024 ES. There are 17 primary schools in LBHF and 13 in RBKC11

7.34 According to the latest available Annual Schools Census data (2025)12 and Published Admissions Numbers (PANs), the combined surplus capacity of these primary schools is 2,148 places, equating to 27 % There is large disparity in surplus

6 Office for National Statistics, 2024 Household Expenditure Survey 2021-2023

7 Department for Education 2023. Student income and expenditure survey: 2021-2022. Table A4.13aExcl.

8 Visa Europe, 2014. UK Working Day Spending Report.

9 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. Childcare Sufficiency Assessment 2023-2024.

10 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 2023 2022-23 Childcare Sufficiency Assessment.

11 Paragraph 7.79 and Table 7.13 of the July 2024 ES stated in erratum that 16 of the primary schools are in LBHF and 14 in RBKC. Figure 7.6 of the July 2024 ES is correct and remains valid. Table 7A.13R corrects this error.

capacity in the study area schools between LBHF and RBKC; primary schools south of the A315 in LBHF have a total surplus capacity of 1,709 places (37 % surplus), compared to 439 places (14 % surplus) in RBKC.

7.35 There has therefore been an increase in surplus capacity since the July 2024 ES which reported 1,689 surplus places (21%) across both boroughs. A full breakdown of primary school capacity is provided in Table 7A 13R which replaces Table 7.13 in the July 2024 ES.

7.36 The closest primary school to the Site is St Cuthbert with St Matthias CofE Primary School in RKBC, which currently has 127 surplus places (equivalent to 60 % surplus capacity)

7.37 There is no statutory requirement to maintain a set level of surplus. The Basic Need funding calculation by the Department for Education includes a 2 % operating margin to assist the churn in the pupil population and support parental choice and general manageability of the system13 At 27 % surplus capacity in the Local Area, there is therefore currently a substantial surplus of places. Surplus school places can create budget and management challenges for schools. To address this, PAN reductions are being introduced across a number of schools in the Local Area, and St Cuthbert with St Matthias CofE Primary School has proposed to close on 31 December 202514

7.38 Six schools have recently amended their PANs. These PAN changes are set out in paragraph 7.82 of the July 2024 ES, which remains valid. The PAN amendments combined and with the proposed closure of St Cuthbert with St Matthias of CofE Primary School will result in 810 fewer places compared to the existing capacity of 7,820 places presented in Table 7A.13R; this will be reached in September 2030.

7.39 LBHF’s School Organisation Review (2022)15 states that the PAN reductions will help to address the surplus of places in the short to medium term. The review also proposes that no new primary expansion programmes should be agreed in the medium to long term (5 to 10 years). In the long-term, the review expects additional demand from housing development to reduce the surplus places across the borough.

7.40 RBKC’s School Place Planning Projections 2024-2516 indicate a continued decrease in primary pupil numbers over coming years, with increasing surplus capacity across RBKC’s primary schools.

Table 7A 13R: Amended Existing Primary School Capacity South of A315

Table 7A 13R: Amended Existing Primary School Capacity South of A315

14

21

22

23

24

25

Note: Negative surplus has been counted as zero capacity.

* These schools have recently amended their PANs – the figures presented represent capacity for 2024/25 entry and thus will differ from the capacity of the school when the amendments have worked their way through all school years.

** This school has proposed its closure on 31 December 2025.

Secondary Schools

7.41 There are 17 secondary schools in LBHF and RBKC (11 in LBHF and 6 in RBKC) – this remains as presented in the July 2024 ES

7.42 According to the latest available Annual School Census data (2025), these schools have a total surplus capacity of 977 places, equating to 8 %. There is significant disparity in surplus capacity between LBHF and RBKC, with 840 surplus places (11 % surplus capacity) in LBHF and 137 surplus places (3 % surplus capacity) in RBKC.

7.43 There has therefore been an increase in surplus capacity since the July 2024 ES which reported 739 surplus places (6 %) across both boroughs. A full breakdown of primary school capacity is provided in Table 7A 14R which replaces Table 7.14 in the 2024 July ES.

7.44 The closest secondary school to the Site is The London Oratory School in LBHF, which currently has no surplus capacity.

7.45 Several schools have recently amended their PANs so the capacities presented in Table 7A.14R do not reflect the full capacity of the school in coming years. These schools are:

• Ark Burlington Danes Academy: PAN decreased from 180 to 150 in September 2022 and then increased to 180 in September 2023. This school will reach its new capacity of 900 by September 2027;

• Fulham Cross Academy (formerly Fulham College Boys School): PAN increased from 120 to 135 in September 2019 and then decreased to 125 in September 2020, down to120 in September 2024 and back up to 125 in September 2025. This school will reach its new capacity of 625 by September 2029;

• Fulham Cross Girls’ School and Language College: PAN increased from 125 to 135 in September 2019, decreased to 120 in September 2024 and will increase to 125 in September 2025. This school will reach its new capacity of 625 by September 2029;

• Hammersmith Academy: PAN increased from 120 to 130 in September 2019 and then again to 140 in September 2022. This school will reach its new capacity of 700 by September 2026;

• The Fulham Boys School: PAN increased from 120 to 130 in September 202, then decreased to 120 in September 2024 and will increase to 125 in September 2025. This school will reach its new capacity of 625 by September 2029;

• The Hurlingham Academy: PAN increased from 120 to 130 in September 2019, then increased to 140 in September 2022 and decreased again to 135 in September 2024. This school will reach its new capacity of 675 by September 2028;

• All Saints Catholic College (formerly Sion Manning Catholic Girls School): PAN increased from 120 to 150 in September 2021 and increased again to 180 in September 2024. This school will reach its new capacity of 900 by September 2028;

• Kensington Aldridge Academy: PAN increased from 180 to 210 in September 2021, then decreased to 180 in September 2022 and will increase to 210 in September 2025. This school will reach its new capacity of 1,050 by September 2029; and

• The Cardinal Vaughan Memorial RC School: PAN increased from 124 to 128 in September 2021. This school will reach its new capacity of 640 by September 2025

7.46 Overall, the PAN amendments will result in 289 more places compared to the existing capacity of 12,941 places presented in Table 7.14R; this will be reached in September 2029

7.47 LBHF’s School Organisation Review (2022)17 predicts that by 2031 there will be 18 % surplus secondary capacity in the borough due to falling secondary school rolls over time as smaller cohorts currently in the primary phase feed through.

7.48 RBKC’s School Place Planning Projections 2024-2518 note that demand for surplus capacity is expected to increase slightly over coming years, however, even with falling birth rates, the overall secondary projections are not comparable with primary. Demand for RBKC secondary schools remains high which is partly attributed to out of borough demand.

Table 7A.14R: Amended Existing Borough Level Secondary School Capacity

17 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, 2022. School Organisation Review.

8

16

7A 14R: Amended Existing Borough Level Secondary School Capacity

Note: Negative surplus has been counted as zero capacity.

* These schools have recently amended their PANs – the figures presented represent capacity for 2024/25 entry and thus will differ from the capacity of the school when the amendments have worked their way through all school years.

Primary Healthcare

7.49 Within 1 km of the Site boundary, there are 16 GP practices (seven in LBHF and nine in RBKC). This remains as presented in the July 2024 ES

7.50 Table 7A 15R presents the latest available patient list size, number of full time equivalent (FTE) GPs and average patient list size per FTE GP (NHS Digital April 2025) and replaces Table 7.15 in the July 2024 ES

7.51 Data for the GP at Hand practice encompasses five branches across London therefore the average patient list size for the local branch is not known – GP at Hand is therefore excluded from the total figures presented in Table 7A.15R

7.52 As presented in Table 7A 15R, GP practices within 1 km of the Site have an average 1,890 registered patients per GP which is slightly higher than presented in the July 2024 ES (1,709 patients per GP) – this is because there are 6.9 fewer full time GPs working across these practices, compared to that presented previously.

7.53 The average number of registered patients per GP within 1 km of the Site is now slightly higher than the average for LBHF (1,729), RBKC (1,772) and the HUDU suggested benchmark (1,800) – but still lower than average for London (2,004).

7.54 Some GPs within 1 km of the Site are operating below benchmark provision indicating surplus capacity available, whilst others are operating above. The closest GP to the Site is North Fulham Surgery, which has an average of 1,031 patients per FTE GP, which is significantly below benchmark provision.

Table 7A.15R: Amended Existing GP Surgeries Provision

Table 7A 15R: Amended Existing GP Surgeries Provision

Community and Leisure Facilities

7.55 The community and leisure facilities baseline presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Open Spaces

7.56 The open space and playspace baseline presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Sensitive Receptors

7.57 The sensitive receptors set out in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development Latest available baseline data for early years facilities, primary schools, secondary schools and healthcare (GPs) has been reviewed as set out in the Baseline Conditions. The latest data does not alter the sensitivity of receptors as presented in the July 2024 ES.

7.58 For early years facilities, only RBKC have published a new Childcare Sufficiency Assessment, the conclusions of which remain as presented in the July 2024 ES – sensitivity of receptor remains low.

7.59 For primary schools, surplus capacity has increased therefore the sensitivity of low remains valid.

7.60 For secondary schools, surplus capacity has marginally increased. Demand still remains relatively high in RBKC, therefore the sensitivity of medium remains valid.

7.61 For primary healthcare, whilst the number of average patients per GP in the local area has increased slightly, it is still below the London average and the closest GP to site is operating significantly below benchmark provision, therefore the sensitivity of low remains valid.

Assessment of Effects

7.62 The assessment has considered the following proposed amendments:

• Detailed and Outline Component floorspace area schedule and associated assumed minimum floorspace to be delivered in respect of the Outline Component;

• Detailed Component and Assumed Outline Component residential unit and tenure mix; and

• Detailed Component playspace provision.

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

7.63 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the development programme and assumptions as set out in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, as set out in ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

Completed Development Effects

Housing Delivery

7.64 There is no change to the Early Phases indicative minimum residential homes and PBSA scenario (as set out in Table 7A 3A). Therefore, the housing delivery effects for the Early Phases reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Population

7.65 There is no change to the Early Phases maximum residential, PBSA, Co-Living and Older Person Housing scenarios Therefore, the likely population set out in Table 7.20 of the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Demand for Social Infrastructure

Early Years Facilities

7.66 The likely number of children 0-4 years identified in Table 7.20 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing early years facilities remain valid. The only proposed amendment relevant to the assessment of early years facilities relates to the area of community/social infrastructure floorspace within the Early Phases, which has been amended to 1,084 m2 - 2,984 m2 gross external area (GEA) from 1,268 m2 - 2,868 m2 GEA. This change would not have a material impact. Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on early years facilities identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Primary Education

7.67 The likely number of children 5-11 years identified in Table 7.20 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing primary schools remain valid, Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on primary education identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Secondary Education

7.68 The likely number of children 12-16 years identified in Table 7.20 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing secondary schools remain valid. Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on secondary education identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Primary Healthcare

7.69 The likely population identified in Table 7.20 of the July 2024 ES, associated GP demand and the sensitivity of existing primary healthcare facilities remain valid. The only proposed amendment relevant to the assessment of primary healthcare relates to the area of community/social infrastructure floorspace (which could include a new health centre) within the Early Phases, which has been amended to 1,084 m2 - 2,984 m2 GEA from 1,268 m2 - 2,868 m2 GEA This change would not have a material impact. Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on primary healthcare identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Leisure and other Community Facilities

7.70 The only proposed amendment relevant to the assessment of leisure and other community facilities is that the Early Phases would now provide 1,084 m2 - 2,984 m2 GEA of community/social infrastructure floorspace (compared to 1,268 m2 - 2,868 m2 GEA set out in the 2024 ES) and 2,363 - 8,613 m2 GEA of leisure floorspace (compared to 2,394 m28,644 m2 GEA previously). This change does not alter the magnitude of impact which remains medium. Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on the provision and access to leisure and community facilities identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Open Space

7.71 There is no change to receptor sensitivity or the proposed provision of open space, therefore the effect identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Playspace

7.72 Playspace requirements set out in Table 7.21 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing play space remain valid. The Amended Detailed Component would deliver 765 m2 (a decrease from 828 m2 reported in the July 2024 ES) but the Applicant’s commitment to the provision of 10 m2 per child in line with GLA requirements remain unchanged. Therefore, the effect identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Employment

7.73 The indicative minimum employment scenario floor areas have been amended to reflect the proposed amendments as presented in Table 7A.6R. Table 7A.22R sets out the associated direct employment generation on-site, showing that the Amended Early Phases are expected to support approximately 4,590 FTE direct on-site jobs (down from 5,635 reported in the July 2024 ES) – of which 2,425 FTE direct on-site jobs are associated with the non-residential uses on the LBHF Site (down from 3,455) and 2,165 FTE direct on-site jobs are associated with the non-residential uses on the RBKC Site (down from 2,180).

7.74 Table 7A 23R considers the employment additionality effects and shows that the Amended Early Phases are expected to support a minimum of approximately 3,960 net additional FTE jobs at the Boroughs level (down from 4,860) and 1,950 net additional FTE jobs in London (down from 2,400)

7.75 The main reason for the expected reduction in minimum employment levels arises as a result of a reduction to the assumed minimum office and research and development (R&D) floorspace within the LBHF Amended Outline Component (reduced from 60,000 m2 GEA to 40,000 m2 GEA). Whilst the minimum number of jobs is lower than previously presented, 3,960 net additional FTE jobs at the Boroughs level is still substantial and still considered to have a medium magnitude of impact, whilst 1,950 net additional FTE jobs at the London level is still considered to have a low magnitude impact. Therefore the effect of the minimum employment on the local economy identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Table 7A 22R: Amended Early Phases Minimum Gross On-Site Employment Generation

* Leakage is assumed to be zero as the employment assessment is work place based.

Note: Figures have been rounded.

Local Expenditure

7.76 The Early Phases would generate economic benefits for the local economy through indirect spending by residents, students and employees.

7.77 For the household spending 1,674 homes has been considered (worst-case housing delivery scenario). The associated households are estimated to generate approximately £20 million per year in additional spending on goods and services of which £7.5 million is associated with households on the LBHF Site and £12.5 million associated with households on the RBKC Site.

7.78 A minimum of 696 PBSA is expected to be delivered which would be on the LBHF Site – students living within this PBSA are estimated to generate approximately £5.5 million per year in additional spending.

7.79 For employee spending, 3,960 FTE net additional jobs at the Borough level has been considered (minimum employment additionality). The spending impact of the new employees would equate to approximately £12 million per year in spending.

7.80 Collectively, it is considered that spending would have a high magnitude impact which remains as presented in the July 2024 ES Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on the local economy identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

7.81 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the development programme and assumptions as set out in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, as set out in ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

Completed Development Effects

Housing Delivery

7.82 The Amended All Phases are expected to deliver an indicative minimum of 3,050 new homes and 696 PBSA bed spaces, of which 2,000 homes and 696 PBSA bed spaces would be in LBHF and 1,050 new homes would be in RBKC. This represents an increase of 400 homes within the LBHF element of the Site compared to the July 2024 ES

7.83 The amended All Phases housing delivery (including PBSA contribution) in LBHF would therefore contribute 14.2 % towards LBHF’s current London Plan housing target which is an increase from 11.7 % set out in the July 2024 ES. Housing delivery in RBKC remains as per the 2024 ES

7.84 The level of housing delivery in the Amended All Phases is still considered to be a high magnitude impact. Therefore, the effect of the All Phases on housing delivery identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Population

7.85 The is no change to the All Phases maximum residential and Older Person Housing scenarios. The only change to the PBSA and Co-Living Scenarios is that additional information has been added to Table 7A 5A to clarify the potential for a small number of PBSA and Co-Living units to come forward in RBKC. The total number of PBSA and Co-Living units remains as per the 2024 ES. Therefore, there is no impact on total population. The total likely population yields set out in Table 7.24 of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Demand for Social Infrastructure

Early Years Facilities

7.86 Both the likely number of children 0-4 years identified and the sensitivity of existing early years facilities remain valid. The only proposed amendment relevant to the assessment ofearly years facilities relates to the area of community/social infrastructure floorspace within the All Phases, which has been amended to 1,084 m2 - 3,734 m2 GEA from 1,368 m23,618 m2 GEA. This change would not have a material impact. Therefore the effect of the All Phases on early years facilities identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Primary Education

7.87 The likely number of children 5-11 years identified in Table 7.24 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing primary schools remain valid. Therefore, the effect of the All Phases on primary education identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Secondary Education

7.88 The likely number of children 12-16 years identified in Table 7.24 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing secondary schools remain valid. Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on secondary education identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Primary Healthcare

7.89 The likely population identified in Table 7.24 of the July 2024 ES, associated GP demand and the sensitivity of existing primary healthcare facilities remain valid. The only proposed amendment relevant to the assessment of primary healthcare relates to the area of community/social infrastructure floorspace (which could include a new health centre) within the All Phases, which has been amended to 1,084 m2 - 3,734 m2 GEA from 1,368 m2 - 3,618 m2 GEA. This change would not have a material impact. Therefore, the effect of the All Phases on primary healthcare identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Leisure and other Community Facilities

7.90 The only proposed amendments relevant to the assessment of leisure and other community facilities is that the All Phases would now provide 1,084 m2 - 2,734 m2 GEA of community/social infrastructure floorspace (compared to 1,268 m2 – 3,618 m2 GEA set out in the July 2024 ES) and 2,363 - 12,113 m2 GEA of leisure floorspace (compared to 2,394 m2 – 12,144 m2 GEA previously). This scale of change does not alter the magnitude of impact which remains medium. Therefore, the effect of the All Phases on the provision and access to leisure and community facilities identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Open Space

7.91 There is no change to receptor sensitivity or the proposed provision of open space, therefore the effect identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Playspace

7.92 Playspace requirements set out in Table 7.25 of the July 2024 ES and the sensitivity of existing play space remain valid. The Amended Detailed Component would deliver 765 m2 (a decrease from 828 m2 reported in the July 2024 ES) but the Applicant’s commitment to the provision of 10 m2 per child in line with GLA requirements remain unchanged. Therefore, the effect identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Employment

7.93 The indicative minimum employment scenario floor areas have been amended to reflect the proposed amendments as set out in Table 7A.6R. Table 7A.26R sets out the associated direct employment generation on-site, showing that the Amended All Phases are expected to support approximately 5,265 FTE direct on-site jobs (down from 8,460 reported in the July 2024 ES) - of which 3,100 FTE direct on-site jobs are associated with the non-residential uses on the LBHF Site (down from 6,280) and 2,165 FTE direct on-site jobs are associated with the non-residential uses on the RBKC Site (down from 2,180).

7.94 Table 7A.27R considers the employment additionality effects and shows that the Amended All Phases are expected to support a minimum of approximately 4,205 net additional FTE jobs at the Boroughs level (down from 6,960) and 2,070 net additional FTE jobs in London (down from 3,430).

7.95 The main reason for this reduction in minimum employment is because there has been a substantial reduction in minimum office and R&D floorspace within the LBHF Outline Component (reduced from a minimum of 100,000 m2 GEA to 50,000 m2 GEA). Whilst the minimum number of jobs is lower than previously presented, 4,205 net additional jobs at the Boroughs level is still significant and still considered to have a medium magnitude of impact, whilst 2,070 net additional FTE jobs at the London level is still considered to have a low magnitude impact. Therefore, the effect on the local economy identified in the July 2024 ES is considered to remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Table 7A.26R: Amended All Phases Minimum Gross On-Site Employment Generation

Table 7A 27R: Amended All Phases Minimum Employment Additionality

Employment Generation

*Leakage is assumed to be zero as the employment assessment is work

Local Expenditure

7.96 The All Phases would generate economic benefits forthe local economy through indirect spending by residents, students and employees.

7.97 For the household spending 3,050 homes has been considered (worst-case minimum housing delivery scenario). The associated households are estimated to generate approximately £36.5 million per year in additional spending on goods and services of which £24 million is associated with households on the LBHF Site and £12.5 million associated with households on the RBKC Site.

7.98 A minimum of 696 PBSA is expected to be delivered which would be on the LBHF Site – students living within this PBSA are estimated to generate approximately £5.5 million per year in additional spending, all of which is associated with the PBSA on the LBHF Site.

7.99 For employee spending, 4,205 FTE net additional jobs at the Borough level has been considered (minimum employment additionality). The spending impact of the new employees would equate to approximately £13 million per year in spending.

7.100 Collectively, it is considered that spending would have a high magnitude impact which remains as presented in the July 2024 ES. Therefore, the effect of the Early Phases on the local economy identified in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

7.101 The additional mitigation section, enhancement measures and residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

7.102 The additional mitigation section, enhancement measures and residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

7.103 The summary of residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

7.104 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Inter-Project Effects

7.105 The inter-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Table 7A 27R: Amended All Phases Minimum Employment Additionality

7.106 As outlined in ES Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the Mund Street School site, as presented in Table 7A.29A.

Table 7A.29A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Socio-Economic Effects

No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction

Early Phases

18 Mund Street School Yes Cumulative scheme demolition and construction stage likely to coincide with Amended Proposed Development demolition and construction stage. Potential for combined employment opportunities and spending in the local economy Yes

All Phases

Same as Early Phases.

Provision of housing, introduction of residential population with demand for school places, health services and play space. Potential for spending in the local economy.

Statement Addendum. Accordingly, a sensitivity test has been undertaken and the results reported within this section of the ES Addendum.

7.112 Within the indicative maximum residential homes unit mix scenario, the potential additional social rented units have been modelled , and has been considered with regard to implications for social infrastructure demands and the conclusions of the July 2024 ES and 2025 ES Addendum Socio-Economic technical assessments. Population yield and playspace requirements for the sensitivity test compared to the worst-case scenarios assessed in the July 2024 ES and 2025 ES Addendum are presented in Table 7A.1N for Early Phases and Table 7A.2N for All Phases. The housing scenarios and population yield from the July 2024 ES remain unchanged for the 2025 ES Addendum. Therefore, Tables 7A.1N and 7A.2N compare against the July 2024 ES scenario. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity test has considered the updated baseline position presented in this addendum

Table 7A.1N: Sensitivity Test Worst-Case Early Phases Population Yield Comparison Early

7.107 The Mund Street School cumulative effects are likely to be the same for the Early and All Phases development scenarios

7.108 The Mund Street School cumulative scheme is expected to deliver 107 new homes on the former school site. Avonmore Primary School in anticipated to temporarily move into the Mund Street school site whilst their new school building is constructed. The redevelopment of the Mund Street school site into new homes would then start once Avonmore Primary School has moved back out, with construction anticipated to begin on site in autumn 2027.

7.109 Demolition and construction of the Mund Street School cumulative scheme is likely to overlap with demolition and construction of the Amended Proposed Development and would be expected to generate combined cumulative employment opportunities. As outlined in the July 2024 ES, it is not possible to undertake a quantitative assessment. In addition, standard practice mitigation measures such as CIL/Section 106 contributions and CEMP would be adopted and secured Given the scale of the cumulative scheme, it would not alter the conclusions of the July 2024 socioeconomic inter-project cumulative assessment for the demolition and construction stage, which is considered to remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

7.110 Given the scale of cumulative housing delivery identified in the July 2024 ES (2,715 homes), the addition of this scheme would not change the scale orsignificance of inter-project effects previously identified. Consistent with standard practice, it is expected that the scheme would consider the effects associated with the introduction of a new residential population, including school space, GP and play space provisioning. In addition, standard practice mitigation measures such as CIL/Section 106 contributions would be adopted and secured Given the scale of the Mund Street School site scheme, it is considered unlikely to affect the inter-project effects presented in the July 2024 ES, which is considered to remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Sensitivity Test

7.111 The GLA released the Accelerating Housing Delivery Planning & Housing Practice Note in December 2024 (the ‘GLA Practice Note ). The GLA Practice Note acknowledges the challenges in the sale of affordable homes to Registered Providers, particularly of intermediate tenure and in response to this identifies a new Fast Track route where all affordable housing is provided as social rent, with a reduced overall proportion of affordable housing. Given the scale and duration of the Amended Proposed Development, this approach provides a potentially helpful route to ensure deliverability It is therefore proposed that permissions granted pursuant to the Hybrid Planning Applications secure the option to deliver either 35 % affordable homes in a social rent / intermediate mix or an equivalent amount, where the affordable homes are made up entirely of social rented units. The equivalency option would only be pursued for Phase 1 of the Hybrid Planning Applications, as set out in the RBKC and LBHF Housing Statement Addendums and Planning

Table 7A.2N: Sensitivity Test Worst-Case All Phases Population Yield Comparison

7.113 The early years population could increase by approximately 47 children for the Early Phases (14% increase) and for the All Phases (9% increase). Given there is existing capacity within early years facilities in both boroughs, and the Applicant would deliver new on-site nursery provision, this change does not alter the scale and significance of effects identified..

7.114 The number of primary age children could increase by approximately 38 children for Early Phases (15% increase) and 39 children for the All Phases (10% increase) . Given the surplus capacity within local primary schools, this change does not alter the scale and significance of effects identified.

7.115 The number of secondary age children could increase by 27 children for Early Phases (18% increase) and All Phases (12% increase). Given there is surplus capacity across the boroughs’ secondary schools, this level of change does not alter the scale or significance of effects identified within the ES.

7.116 Accordingly, based on the findings of the sensitivity test population modelling, replacement of social rent / intermediate tenure mix with social rent mix would have a negligible scale of change on the total population of the Amended Proposed Development. Therefore, the scale and significance of effect and resulting conclusions of primary healthcare assessment remains valid.

7.117 For the sensitivity test, the total playspace requirement would be 8,934 m2 for the Early Phases and 12,605 m2 for the All Phases, which would be an increase of 1,185 m2 compared to that assessed in the July 2024 ES. The Applicant’s commitment to the provision of 10 m2 playspace per child in line with GLA requirements would be secured through the S106 agreement. Therefore the scale and significance of effect and resulting conclusions of playspace assessment identified in the ES remains valid.

7.118 Accordingly, the sensitivity test has concluded that child yield and playspace requirements would increase compared to the scenario assessed in the July 2024 ES. However, the magnitude of impact considered against the baseline would not alter the conclusions of the July 2024 ES and 2025 ES Addendum, which remain valid.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

7.119 Following the July 2024 ES submission, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required minor clarification updates to the assessment.

7.120 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the land use floorspace area schedules and residential unit and tenure mix schedules of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components and their implications for housing delivery and employment, as well as population yield.

7.121 In respect of baseline conditions, the majority of baseline presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid with the following exceptions:

• Baseline data for early years facilities, schools and primary healthcare was updated using latest available data.

• RBKC have published a new Childcare Sufficiency Assessment which continues to conclude there is sufficient capacity available.

• Surplus capacity within both local primary schools and borough secondary schools has increased since the July 2024 ES, with 27 % surplus capacity at primary level and 8 % at secondary level.

• For primary healthcare, the average number of patients per GP in the local has increased slightly (to 1,890 patients per FTE GP) but is still below the London average (2,004 patients per FTE GP) and the closest GP practice to the site is still operating significantly below benchmark provision (1,031 patients per FTE GP at North Fulham Surgery)

7.122 The Early Phase assessment has concluded that all socio-economic effects identified in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. There is no change to housing delivery, population or social infrastructure demands. However, the following amendments are noted which do not alter the conclusions of the July 2024 ES:

• Minimum employment associated with the Early Phases is lower at 4,590 jobs on-site which would result in a net increase of 3,960 jobs in LBHF and RBKC and a net increase of 1,950 jobs in London

• Spending figures have marginally changed since the July 2024 ES – which is estimated in the region of £20 million for annual household spending, £5.5 million for annual student spending and £12 million for annual employee spending (based on 3,015 net additional jobs in the boroughs).

7.123 The All Phase assessment has concluded that all socio-economic effects identified in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. There is no change to population or social infrastructure demands. However, the following amendments are noted which do not alter the conclusions of the July 2024 ES:

• Minimum housing delivery has increased to 3,050 new homes, with an additional 400 homes within the LBHF part of the Site.

• Minimum employment is lower at 5,265 jobs on-site which would result in a net increase of 4,205 jobs in LBHF and RBKC and a net increase of 2,070 jobs in London.

• Spending figures have marginally changed since the July 2024 ES – which is estimated in the region of £36.5 million for annual household spending, £5.5 million for annual student spending and £13 million for annual employee spending (based on 4,205 net additional jobs in the boroughs).

7.124 The cumulative assessment presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

7.125 Consideration of a potential cumulative scheme at the Mund Street School site has concluded that inter-project cumulative effects are likely to arise. However on the basis that standard practice mitigation measures (CIL/Section 106 contributions and CEMP) are adopted and secured and considering its small/low contribution to housing delivery and associated effects within the study area, the inter-project cumulative assessment conclusions of the July 2024 ES would not be affected. Accordingly, the inter-project cumulative effects of the July 2024 ES remain valid.

7.126 Accordingly, no additional or different significant effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

8A HUMAN HEALTH

Introduction

8.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely human health effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the human health assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the public health implications of the proposed amendments discussed in relevant other ES Addendum chapters

8.2 To avoid unnecessary duplication this health assessment takes into account, but does not repeat, the updated and new text in relevant other ES Addendum chapters. For example it is noted that there are additional air quality policies that are relevant to human receptors, but these are applied and assessed in Chapter 6A: Air Quality, the residual effect conclusions of which are the input to this health assessment.

8.3 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 8: Human Health and Volume 3, Technical Appendices 8.1 and 8.2 of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but have been updated where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

8.4 There are no updates to the Human Health Volume 3: Technical Appendices of the July 2024 ES

8.5 The introductory text presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid .

Methodology

8.6 In respect of national public health legislation, policy and guidance the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid, with the exception of the following:

• The NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251 Changes to NPPF Section 8: Promoting healthy and safe communities, are relevant to this assessment. The changes at paragraph 97 include policy for refusing planning application for hot food takeaways and fast-food outlets within walking distance of schools and other places where children and young people congregate; and in locations where there is evidence that a concentration of such uses is having an adverse impact on local health, pollution or anti-social behaviour These revisions are relevant to diet and nutrition and influences on human health. Paragraph 101 supports faster delivery of public service infrastructure, including health. The provision states that significant weight should be placed on the importance of new, expanded or upgraded public service infrastructure when considering proposals for development.

• In July 2025 the Government released its new NHS Plan ‘Fit for the future: 10 Year Health Plan for England’2 The relevant shifts in approach are ‘from hospital to community care’ and from an approach of treating sickness to prevention’. The latter is the most relevant to this assessment and aligns with the Amended Proposed Development’s embedding of healthy place making to promote good health and wellbeing. The shift from hospital to community care is also potentially relevant and is part of the Amended Proposed Development’s ongoing dialogue with the NHS as to the model of care that they envisage

8.7 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

1 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

2 UK Government, NHS. July 2025. Fit for the Future. 10 Year Health Plan for England. ISBN 978-1-5286-5807-2

3 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan. RBKC.

8.8 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)3 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC new local plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking assessment. The July 2024 ES referenced polic es V1 and SI1. The minor variation between the Reg 19 2022 version and adopted 2024 wordings of these polices has been reviewed (e.g. capitalisation of Borough and the cross refence to Policies GB15 and HO3). Other than the changes outlined, the adopted RBKC New Local Plan contains no other changes of relevance to this assessment and it is confirmed that there is no material effect on the conclusions in relation to human health assessment.

8.9 In respect to topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid In addition, the IEMA health impact assessment competency standards guidance was published in May 20244 Whilst not explicitly referenced in the July 2024 ES, it is confirmed that the authors of the July 2024 ES and subsequent 2025 ES addendum human health assessments comply with these standards

Consultation

8.10 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

8.11 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2A.10N of ES Volume 3A.

8.12 The Waterman review comments have necessitated the following:

• Assessment of housing delivery;

• Clarification updates in respect of the future baseline, general population group conclusion reporting, air quality operational effects, cumulative assessment; and

• Additional detail within the assessment of community identity and social participation.

8.13 Responses to stakeholder comments (HUDU) were provided separately and does not affect the assessment.

Assessment Scope

8.14 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following aspects:

• In respect of technical scope:

all references to ES chapters in Table 8.1 of the July 2024 ES, should now also include corresponding addendum chapters.

an assessment against the housing determinant for health was scoped out by the specialist at paragraph 8.10 of the July 2024 ES following principles of proportionate assessment as potential health effects were concluded to be “not likely” for the demolition and construction stage. However, Waterman review comments require that the housing determinant should be scoped in to discuss the beneficial completed development stage effects of the Amended Proposed Development and to signpost where additional information is set out within the Hybrid Planning Applications documents in relation to consideration of dwelling mix, build quality, appropriate and equitably located housing, supporting independent living for older and disable people. Therefore, completed development stage housing effects has been considered in this addendum at the Assessment of Effects section. Table 8A.1N provides signposting to where housing delivery and wider housing considerations are addressed within other parts of the submission documents, including in relation to consideration of dwelling mix, build quality, appropriate and equitably located housing, supporting independent living for older and disabled people. As the July 2024 ES identified no likely significant demolition and

4 Pyper, R., Birley, M., Buroni, A., Gibson, G., Day, L., Waples, H., Beard, C., Dellafiora, S., Salder, J., Netherton, A., Green, L., Purdy, J., Douglas, M. (2024) IEMA Guide: Competent Expert for Health Impact Assessment including Health in Environmental Assessments.

construction health effects in respect of the housing determinant, no further consideration has been given to this stage.

• In respect of spatial scope:

all references to ES chapters of the July 2024 ES, should now also include corresponding addendum chapters. for the housing determinant assessment, the study areas are consistent with Volume 1, Chapter 7: SocioEconomics of the July 2024 ES Table 7.2, with Borough level spatial sensitivity (LBHF and RBKC) as these remain valid for the addendum Socio-Economic assessment. To ensure that localised health inequalities issues are also considered, the health baseline and assessment of this determinant has also had regard to the most deprived lower layer super output areas (LSOAs) in proximity to the Site (as set out in Table 8.3 of the July 2024 ES)

• In respect of temporal scope, the following clarification and confirmation are provided to Waterman’s review comment with regard to assessment against a future baseline:

IEMA Guide: Effective Scoping of Human Health in EIA (2022), notes that in assessing change, regard should be had to both current and future residents. That is the case with the July 2024 ES (and this addendum), which consistently has consideration of future on-site occupants.

IEMA Guide: Determining Significance for Human Health in EIA (2022), notes that regard should be had to external factors that affect the future baseline of a population. It is noted that the July 2024 ES (and this addendum) takes as its input the outputs of other ES assessments. Therefore, the human health assessment inherently includes consideration of future baselines as presented in other ES assessments. It would not be proportionate to repeat such information within the health assessment, but it is confirmed that it has been taken into account.

Furthermore, population health data presents a snapshot at a particular time. It is well recognised that population health is subject to continuing influences, both at the individual and community level. Influences may be environmental, such as seasonal variation in wellbeing and communicable diseases, they may also respond to socio-economic factors, such as migration and the availability of jobs. Longer term trends and interventions in population health may influence the future baseline. Health and social care, public health initiatives and government policies aim to reduce inequalities and improve quality of life. The historic success of such interventions is increasingly challenged by national trends such as an ageing population and rising levels of obesity.

For assessment purposes, the defined existing health baseline is considered a suitable proxy of the future baseline. The current baseline used in this assessment includes appropriate health indicators to reflect the types of health outcomes that would also be relevant for the future population (e.g. in relation to age and longterm conditions). The July 2024 ES (and this addendum) methodology includes a categorisation of vulnerable population groups which, for example, allows for the effects of older people and people with existing poor health to be distinguished from the general population. Following the IEMA Guidance, the health assessment sensitivity score for each vulnerable group is independent of the population size within that group (e.g. older people or people with existing poor health), which would be the main change between the current and future baseline. The sensitivity scores within the health assessment therefore, account for both current and future population characteristics.

It would not be proportionate (or consistent with the qualitative assessment approach taken) to quantitatively model the population’s future health. This reflects the complexities of interactions between the wider determinants of health, as well as the potential for macro-economic changes in the next decade that are hard to predict. Any predication would have such wide error margins that it would greatly limit the value of the exercise. National population health trend forecasting is undertaken as a government public health activity5 and such trends has been taken into account as part of the professional judgements reached during the health assessment.

6 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, 2025 Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2024-2029. Available at: https://www.lbhf.gov.uk/health-and-care/public-health [accessed on 07/07/2025].

7 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and City of Westminster, 2023. Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2023-2033, Healthier and Happier Lives. Available at: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/health-and-social-care/public-health/public-health-strategy-policies-and-reports/health-and-wellbeing-strategy-2023-2033 [Accessed 07/07/2025]

Baseline Characterisation Method

8.15 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid with the exception of the following:

• The Hammersmith and Fulham Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy6 has been updated since the July 2024 ES submission The updated strategy’s priorities have been reviewed and taken into account. The most relevant is the priority to ‘Cultivate the conditions necessary for people to flourish and build their resilience’ This includes seeking outcomes where: fewer people live in poverty and are more food and energy-secure; people are safe within their homes and in the borough; and people can access fair, fulfilling local employment opportunities. These are outcomes the Amended Proposed Development is supportive of through ts design and the opportunities it creates

• The Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster’s Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2023-20337 has been adopted since the July 2024 ES submission. This includes ambitions for ‘good quality homes’, improved mental health and wellbeing, ill-health prevention, being ‘safe and part of our communities’, ‘healthy environments’, access to the best services’, being ‘all financially stable’ and ‘supported independent living’. These are also outcomes the Amended Proposed Development is supportive of through its design and the opportunities it creates.

8.16 The JSNAs, pharmaceutical needs assessments and other public health indicators for the boroughs are regularly updated and the updates since the July 2024 ES submission do not materially alter the baseline as assessed or the outcomes of the health assessment

8.17 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

8.18 The refreshed Care Quality Commission reports8 and Access to Healthy Assets & Hazards9 index releases have been reviewed and do not materially alter the baseline as assessed or the outcomes of the health assessment.

Assessment Method

8.19 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of the following:

• The assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

• All references to ES chapters of the July 2024 ES, should now also include corresponding addendum chapters.

• Within the July 2024 ES, the vulnerable group population only was assessed for air quality, noise and climate, which represents a worst-case. However, in response to a clarification request from Waterman, this addendum provides both ‘general population’ and ‘vulnerable group population’ assessment conclusions, rather than just ‘where appropriate’ This does not alter the original conclusions (as the worst-case was assessed) but provides additional clarity on potential inequalities.

• In response to the Waterman review comments, the housing determinant has been assessed based on review of the Socio-Economic assessment and other planning submission documents and application of professional judgement.

• In response to a clarification request from Waterman, a supplementary approach to the inter-project cumulative stage assessment has been undertaken. This clarifies the professional judgements reached, including in the absence of health impact assessments accompanying cumulative schemes.

Assessment Criteria

8.20 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

8 Care Quality Commission, Hammersmith and Fulham: local authority assessment, 09 May 2025. Available at: https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authorityassessment-reports/hammersmithfulham-0525 [Accessed 07/07/2025]

9 Geographic Data Service. Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH). Version 4 released November 2024 and updated June 2025. Available at: https://data.geods.ac.uk/dataset/access-to-healthy-assets-hazards-ahah [Accessed 07/07/2025].

Assumptions and Limitations

8.21 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, although the following clarification is provided:

• With regard to Travel to Work data, the Census 2021 is a snapshot and its results are likely to have been influenced by the Covid-19 pandemic. It is however considered that given the London context and the indicator relating to travel distances with a cut-off of 10 km, the great majority of people would have reported a similar result whether they were working from home/on furlough during the pandemic compared to their usual commute to work. Any variation is not considered to be so great as to materially alter the conclusions as to the likely significant effects for population health.

• Regarding the application of the precautionary principle in public health, this is discussed by the WHO10. The WHO notes how the precautionary principle is a two-stage test, requiring both uncertainty and serious threats to health, i.e. large effect sizes indicated by available evidence. The WHO describes health impact assessments (such as this health assessment) as a “compass to guide public health decisions under uncertainty” and that “a centrepiece of precautionary assessment is environment and health assessment, which weighs the science of hazards and exposure. In this step, evidence of risk and uncertainty is examined to determine the possibility (and plausibility) of a significant health threat and the need for precautionary action.” Such an approach has been taken by this health assessment, which considers levels of exposure, extent of the population exposed and the scale of change in relevant risk factors for health outcomes.

Baseline Conditions

Existing Baseline

8.22 The health baseline presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the following is noted:

• Where updates in the existing baseline are discussed in other 2025 ES Addendum chapters, these have been taken into account in this addendum health assessment.

• Where there have been updates to public health indicators used in the June 2024 ES, these have been reviewed. The changes are not considered to be to an extent that would alter the July 2024 health existing baseline summary. In line with proportionate assessment a full update of the baseline has therefore not been undertaken.

• In respect of the existing Site, a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, but does not alter the validity of the Site description.

• In response to Waterman review comments a selection of additional indicators relevant to the housing determinant of health have been considered Consistent with the July 2024 ES, the baseline for the housing determinant has focused on LSOAs with high deprivation in proximity to the Site, as well as the Borough data As housing also relates to broader health and wellbeing outcomes, other indicators presented in the July 2024 ES such as general health status, are also relevant to this determinant and are not repeated.

Housing

8.23 This section presents baseline statistics relevant to the health determinant of housing. The Amended Proposed Development responds positively to the need for new homes, including affordable homes. The baseline focuses on these outcomes. Other indicators, for example in relation to homelessness and fuel poverty, are noted and benefits may also indirectly extend to such outcomes. However, in line with proportionate assessment and reporting, the baseline focuses on affordability and tenure indicators.

8.24 Table 8A

Office for

Improvement and Disparities (OHID). Fingertips. Affordability of home ownership, 2023 data. Accessed 07/07/2025].

Table 8A.1N: Amended Existing Affordability of Home Ownership Ratio

8.25 The data confirms that homes are less affordable compared to the regional and national averages. The affordability ratio for home ownership in LBHF is 17, and in RBKC it is 25.4, both of which are higher than the ratios for London (12.7) and England (8.3). Affordability is measured as the ratio of median house price to median gross annual residence-based earnings. A higher ratio indicates that, on average, it is less affordable for a resident to purchase a home in the local authority area.

8.26 In terms of housing tenure, Table 8A.2N presents a summary of existing Housing Tenure12 in the study area.

Table 8A.2N: Amended Existing Housing Tenure Percentage

8.27 The data shows a lower baseline proportion of owner-occupied households and a higher proportion of social and private rented households in the representative LSOAs for LBHF and RBKC compared to the regional and national averages. In LBHF, the proportion of owner-occupied households is 13.5 % in LBHF 012C, 12 % in LBHF 015A, and 10.7 % in LBHF 015E, well below the regional average of 45.2 % and the national average of 61.3 %. In RBKC, owner-occupation rates are 34.3 % in RBKC 011B, 13.4 % in RBKC 015D, and 28.7 % in RBKC 017C, which are similarly lower than both the regional and national averages. While RBKC 011B shows a slightly higher proportion of owner-occupied households compared to the other RBKC LSOAs, it still falls below the national average.

8.28 The proportion of social rented households is substantially higher in most of the representative LSOAs for LBHF and in one LSOA in RBKC compared to the regional and national averages. In LBHF, the proportion of social rented households is 61.9 % in LBHF 012C, 74.1 % in LBHF 015A, and 63.9 % in LBHF 015E, well above the London average of 23.1 % and the national average of 17.1 %. In RBKC, the proportion of social rented households is 9.2 % in RBKC 011B (lower than both the regional and national averages), 51.6 % in RBKC 015D, and 23.3 % in RBKC 017C, both of which exceed the regional and national averages.

8.29 Regarding private rented households, LBHF 012C has a proportion of 23.4 %, and LBHF 015E has 24.2 %, both slightly higher than the national average of 20.5 % but lower than the London average of 30 %. In LBHF 015A (13.7 %), the proportion of private rented households is lower than both the regional and national averages. In RBKC, private rental is more prevalent: 55.9 % in RBKC 011B, 33.9 % in RBKC 015D, and 47.6 % in RBKC 017C, all of which are higher than the regional and national averages.

8.30 Overall, the affordability ratio for home ownership aligns with the broader housing tenure trends. There is a notably higher trend of rented households and a lower proportion of owner-occupied households in both LBHF and RBKC compared to the regional and national averages

12 NOMIS, using Census 2021. Housing Tenure, 2021 data. Accessed 07/07/2025].

Future Baseline

8.31 The future baseline as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. It is noted that the July 2024 ES takes as its input the outputs of other July 2024 ES assessments. Therefore, the human health assessment inherently includes consideration of future baselines as presented in other ES assessments. To avoid duplication, this has not been repeated here.

8.32 The following clarification and confirmation are provided to Waterman’s review comment with regard to assessment against a future baseline:

• Population health data presents a snapshot at a particular time. It is well recognised that population health is subject to continuing influences, both at the individual and community level. Influences may be environmental, such as seasonal variation in wellbeing and communicable diseases, they may also respond to socio-economic factors, such as migration and the availability of jobs. Longer term trends and interventions in population health may influence the future baseline. Health and social care, public health initiatives and government policies aim to reduce inequalities and improve quality of life. The historic success of such interventions is increasingly challenged by national trends such as an ageing population and rising levels of obesity.

• For assessment purposes, the current health baseline is considered a suitable proxy of the future baseline. The current baseline used in this assessment includes appropriate health indicators to reflect the types of health outcomes that would also be relevant for the future population (e.g. in relation to age and long-term conditions). National population health trend forecasting is undertaken as a government public health activity and such trends have been taken into account as part of the professional judgements reached during the health assessment.

• The health assessment methodology includes a categorisation of vulnerable population groups which, for example, allows for the effects of older people and people with existing poor health to be distinguished from the general population. Following the IEMA guidance, the health assessment sensitivity score for each vulnerable group is independent of the population size within that group (e.g. older people or people with existing poor health), which would be the main change between the current and future baseline. The sensitivity scores within the health assessment therefore, account for both current and future population characteristics. It would not be proportionate (or consistent with the qualitative assessment approach taken) to quantitatively model the population’s future health. This reflects the complexities of interactions between the wider determinants of health, as well as the potential for macro-economic changes in the next decade that are hard to predict.

Sensitive Receptors

8.33 The sensitive receptors set out in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Effects

Early Phases

8.34 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. In respect of dust and amenity, the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of previously reported impacts.

8.35 In respect of road traffic emissions, the assessment considers the WHO air quality guideline (AQG) levels, but notes that the future baseline conditions already exceed WHO target levels. The contribution from the Amended Proposed Development would be incremental and relate to a very minor contribution to risk factors for respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity Given the many other sources in the urban context, a slight to small effect on the health baseline would be expected. As such, the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.36 In respect of site suitability, all concentrations would be below the National Air Quality Objectives (NAQOs). However, the WHO AQG Levels would be exceeded in the future baseline. These conclusions are consistent with the July 2024 ES.

8.37 Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects for vulnerable groups presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.38 The Early Phases demolition and construction public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The general population relevant to this assessment are the existing off-site population (residents, workers and visitors); and the future on-site occupants (residents, construction industry workers, other workers and visitors).

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium. The general population comprise those members of the community who live, work, or study at a distance where high levels of dispersion and deposition would limit the effects of any change in exposure due to the demolition and construction activities of the Early Phases. Medium sensitivity is also associated with populations who have a limited capacity to adapt to changes in air quality.

• The magnitude of impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES.

• On the basis of the above considerations, the Early Phases demolition and construction air quality public health effects on the general population, would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.39 ES Chapter 17A: Climate has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered The proposed amendments are not on a scale that would give rise to materially different significant public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.40 The Early Phases demolition and construction public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The general population relevant to this assessment are the existing off-site population (residents, workers and visitors); and the future on-site occupants (residents, construction industry workers, other workers and visitors)

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium The general population comprise those members of the community who live, work, or study at a distance where extreme rainfall, heatwaves and windstorm impacts to materials, structures or activities of the Amended Proposed Development would have a limited influence on behaviours or safety risks relating to population level health outcomes Medium sensitivity is also associated with populations who have a limited capacity to adapt to changes in extreme weather event risks, including heatwaves

• The magnitude of impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES. The magnitude conclusion applies to both the general population and vulnerable group population assessment.

• On the basis of the above considerations, the Early Phases demolition and construction climate related public health effects on the general population, would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Noise and Vibration

8.41 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes taking into account additional significant adverse effects associated with demolition and construction noise and vibration, as well as changes in road noise for a very few receptors closest to the Empress Place access road The proposed amendments would not give rise to materially different significant public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Consideration has been given to the additional moderate adverse significant effect for a very few people in relation to demolition and construction stage road transport noise at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road (indicative receptor locations R04 and R06 in ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration) The proposed amendments are not considered to give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.42 Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. It is clarified that in July 2024 ES noise effects for the vulnerable group population conclusion relate to both the Site and Local levels.

8.43 The Early Phases demolition and construction public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The general population relevant to this assessment are the existing off-site population (residents, workers and visitors); and the future on-site occupants (residents, construction industry workers, other workers and visitors).

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium. The general population comprise those members of the community who live, work, or study at a distance where noise and vibration exposures of the demolition and construction activities of the Early Phases would be of less concern Medium sensitivity is also associated with populations who have a limited capacity to adapt to changes in noise and vibration exposures.

• The magnitude of impact would be medium for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES. The magnitude conclusion applies to both the general population and vulnerable group population assessment.

• On the basis of the above considerations, the Early Phases demolition and construction noise and vibration public health effects on the general population, would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Land Quality

8.44 ES Chapter 13A: Ground Conditions has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the demolition and construction conclusion of no probable effect presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Water Quality or Availability

8.45 ES Chapter 13A: Ground Conditions and ES Chapter 14A: Water Resources have been reviewed and the public health implications of their residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the demolition and construction conclusion of no probable effect presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.46 ES Chapter 2A: Townscape and Visual has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This is because proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.47 The Early Phases demolition and construction beneficial public health effects would be the same as set out in July 2024 ES.

8.48 In response to Waterman post-submission comments the following additional commentary is provided on meanwhile uses for both the general and vulnerable population groups:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium and the sensitivity of the vulnerable groups, collectively assessed, is high for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES.

• Demolition and construction works have the potential to cause disruption to, or loss of, on-site uses and facilities. The existing and meanwhile uses on the Site which promote community identity and culture currently include the Earls Community Hub; the Lillie Road shops which hosts popular street food brands; the Summer of Art programme, which includes public art installations and exhibitions on-site; Empress Studios which includes 46 creative studios; the Lost Estate, which provides theatre at 9 Beaumont Avenue; and the Artists in Residence programme involving 12 artists working with the community to deliver portraits and community arts projects. These uses are temporary and subject to short-term leases which would conclude prior to commencement of the Early Phases demolition and construction works

• For population health, the change in access to on-site uses and facilities can be characterised as of small scale for the context, experienced frequently over a medium-term duration. The predominant health outcome change due to the potential disruption to, or loss of, these existing uses and facilities and opportunities would relate to quality-ofife for a small minority of the population at the Site and Local Level Given the urban context of other facilities and opportunities, this adverse effect is likely to be localised and is unlikely to appreciably affect residents or service users at the wider Borough Level. As opportunities for community identity provided by the Site would be offered during the completed development stage of the Early Phases, when demolition and construction activity cease, a rapid reversal of such adverse health effects would be expected. The magnitude of the impact would be low.

• Accordingly, the community identity, culture, resilience and nfluence effects during the demolition and construction stage of the Early Phases would be temporary, medium-term and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) with regard to loss of on-site uses and facilities at the Site and Local levels

• For the vulnerable population, the Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence effects during the demolition and construction stage of the Early Phases would be temporary, medium-term and direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) with regards to loss of meanwhile facilities and opportunities at the Site and Local levels.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.49 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.50 The Early Phases demolition and construction public health beneficial effects would be the same as set out in July 2024 ES

8.51 In response to Waterman post-submission comments, the following additional commentary is provided for both the general and vulnerable population groups:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium and the sensitivity of the vulnerable groups, collectively assessed, is high for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES.

• Demolition and construction works have the potential to cause disruption to, or loss of, on-site uses and facilities, as described in relation to ‘Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence’. There may be some temporary reduction in the psychosocial environment due to the disruption to such facilities, as well as to the temporary reductions in the amenity of formal and informal outdoor meeting spaces associated with demolition and construction activities.

• For population health, the change in the psychosocial environment can be characterised as of small scale for the context, experienced frequently over a medium-term duration. The predominant health effect would relate to minimal changes in quality-of-life and mental health morbidity for a small minority of the population at the Site and Local Level. Given the urban context of other facilities and opportunities, this adverse effect is likely to be localised and is unlikely to appreciably affect residents or service users at the wider Borough Level. As opportunities for social interaction provided by the Site increase with the completed development and its ongoing engagement activities, a rapid reversal of such adverse health effects would be expected once the demolition and construction activities are complete. The magnitude of the impact would be low.

• For the general population, the Early Phases demolition and construction community dentity, culture, resilience and influence effects would be temporary, medium-term and direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) with regards to a reduced psychosocial environment (including from loss of meanwhile facilities) to the at the Site and Local levels.

• For the vulnerable population, the Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence effects during the demolition and construction stage of the Early Phases would be temporary, medium-term and direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) with regards to a reduced psychosocial environment (including from loss of meanwhile facilities) at the Site and Local levels.

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.52 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes effects in relation to severance, pedestrian and cyclist delay, pedestrian and cyclist amenity, pedestrian fear and intimidation, driver delay, accident and safety effects, and parking and service demand effects. The Amended Proposed Developments traffic management measures in the CEMP and CTLP would be expected to reduce effects, such that a small change in the health baseline would be expected The temporary significant adverse effect in relation to a limited number of changes in accident and safety risks are noted.

8.53 For population health the changes would relate to a small change in risk factors for injury risk and morbidity and mortality outcomes for a very few people associated with traffic accidents and any delay in receipt of emergency care. Such effects arise as a function of additional vehicle movements incrementally affecting risk levels. Such one-off individual level effects over the short- to medium-term are acknowledged but at a population-level would be unlikely to result in significant public health effects, or discernible changes in healthcare service demand, such that a very limited change in the health baseline would be expected. The magnitude of impact would remain low as set out in July 2024 ES.

8.54 The proposed amendments are not considered to give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Effects

Housing

8.55 Table 8A.3N provides signposting to the coverage of housing in other parts of the submission documents. These include information on how the Amended Proposed Development responds to build quality, dwelling mix and connection with existing communities. Further information and assessment are set out within this section.

Table 8A.3N: Summary of Housing Effect Coverage across July 2024 and 2025 Addendum Documents Document Summary

ES Chapter 4-Proposed Development13

Design and Access Statement14 and Corresponding Addendum

A project description is provided that includes descriptions of the residential components in the Area Schedules, as well as information on the Public Realm and Open Space Network

The latter would support connection with existing communities through spaces that enable social interaction.

The Amended Proposed Development would provide a range of housing typologies that responds to the architectural heritage of the local area and cater for multigenerational living across multiple tenures.

The Amended Proposed Development would deliver a range of housing tenures to meet strategic and local need, including rented and intermediate affordable homes.

Provision for Later Living accommodation is factored into the Development Specification. The design of this type of accommodation would include resident lounges, oversized corridor areas and accessible communal terraces that encourage socialising and prevent loneliness and isolation.

Community uses including play would not be segregated by housing tenure and would be provided for all age groups and needs.

Pedestrian routes across the Site would connect neighbouring communities bringing increased opportunities for social interaction.

Economic Inclusion Statement15

The Amended Proposed Development would have a diverse and inclusive housing offer aimed at meeting the housing needs of different people by providing a range of house types, designs and specifications, with particular consideration of the local housing need.

The diverse and inclusive housing offer would offer mixed tenure; available for market sale and rent; ater living; affordable (35 % affordable housing); and purpose built student accommodation (PBSA).

As part of the Detailed Component, a new Community Centre will be constructed on Plot WB05 providing, from the earliest stage of the Proposed Development, a crucial nexus for community integration and outreach activity.

Equality Statement16 The proposed housing would meet internal space and accessibility standards to ensure the needs of disabled people can be met, including the following:

• Provision of accessible amenities for all residents;

• Accessible housing in line with London Plan 2021 requirements - 10 % of homes would meet Building Regulation requirements M4(3) and the remaining 90 % would meet M4(2);

• Lifts would be designed to accommodate wheelchair users along with other passengers;

• Evacuations lifts would be provided on each core to ensure safe and dignified means of escape for all residents.

Table 8A.3N: Summary of Housing Effect Coverage across July 2024 and 2025 Addendum Documents Document Summary

• Internal circulation spaces would meet relevant guidance to ensure sufficient space for wheelchair users to manoeuvre and pass others.

These measures would support residents through all stages of life enabling a greater level of autonomy for older residents and residents with disabilities.

Overall, the Amended Proposed Development would have a positive effect upon some protected characteristics including Age and Disability.

Public Benefits Statement17 The provision of discounted market rented homes (DMR), social rented, intermediate (shared ownership), student housing and older persons housing would reflect the different needs of the two boroughs.

As Imperial College London grows, the need for student housing in the surrounding areas has increased. The private rented market is currently accommodating much of this increased need where there is insufficient supply of PBSA.

The population is aging; by 2029 the number of older person households (over 75 years) in London will have increased by 42 %. Therefore, there is a clear need for suitable accommodation.

The quality and affordability of new housing would generate social value as people enjoy living in good quality homes, feel safer, experience fewer home-based problems and live in better environmental conditions.

Social Value Statement18 Affordable housing offers a more diverse group of people the opportunity to live in a highquality neighbourhood for a more affordable price and contributes to a thriving neighbourhood.

‘Housing and Neighbourhood’ from the Amended Proposed Development would generate approximately £7,125,000 in social value.

The quality and affordability of new housing would generate social value as people enjoy living in good quality homes, feel safer, experience fewer home-based problems and live in better environmental conditions.

The provision of generous residential amenities in many of the plots, would also offer greater life satisfaction to those who live there, through both practical means and positive wellbeing. Social spaces on offer in the buildings may help connect local residents and improve neighbourliness, supporting a good local community

Housing Statement RBKC19 and Housing Statement LBHF20

Affordable housing would be provided across a range of tenures and would also be distributed throughout the Amended Proposed Development, delivered alongside market homes.

The Amended Proposed Development is capable of delivering approximately 424 affordable homes by unit and 1,352 by habitable room.

RBKC - The affordable homes would include a mix of tenures:

• Social Rent homes would provide for households registered on RBKC’s Housing Waiting List;

• Intermediate Rent homes, aligned to incomes of local key workers, would ease the pressure on the ‘squeezed middle’ cohort and support recruitment and retention;

• Affordable Home Ownership dwellings would give households a helping hand to get onto the property ladder; and

• Up to 150 Later Living homes.

Table 8A.3N: Summary of Housing Effect Coverage across July 2024 and 2025 Addendum Documents Document Summary

LBHF - The affordable homes would include a mix of tenures:

• Intermediate Rent homes, aligned to incomes of local key workers, would ease the pressure on the ‘squeezed middle’ cohort and support recruitment and retention;

• Affordable Home Ownership dwellings would give households a helping hand to get onto the property ladder;

• PBSA including 35 % affordable student bed spaces;

• Co-living; and

• Provisions to deliver 150 Later Living Homes.

The final mix of affordable homes across RBKC and LBHF would be confirmed as each part of the Amended Proposed Development comes forward at RMA stages

ES Chapter 7-SocioEconomics21 and Corresponding Addendum

Early Phases

• Housing delivery (including PBSA contribution) in LBHF would contribute the equivalent of 5.6 % towards the London Plan target for LBHF.

• Housing delivery in RBKC would contribute the equivalent 23.4 % towards the London Plan target for RBKC.

• The effect of the Early Phases housing delivery is judged to be Moderate Beneficial (significant) at the Borough level.

All Phases

• Housing delivery (including PBSA contribution) in LBHF would contribute the equivalent of 14.2 % towards the current London Plan target for LBHF.

• Housing delivery in RBKC would contribute the equivalent of 23.4 % towards the London Plan target for RBKC.

• The effect of the All Phases housing delivery upon housing is judged to be Major Beneficial (significant) at the Borough level.

Summary of July 2024 Housing Statement

8.56 The Housing Statements for RBKC and LBHF confirm that the housing proposed as part of the Early Phases scenario responds positively and innovatively to the Boroughs’ identified needs. This includes the demand for high quality new homes, reduced housing costs, and smaller homes suited to the growing number of single and childless households. Key benefits of the Amended Proposed Development include improved affordability through a significant increase in local housing supply, helping to reduce housing costs driven by supply shortages; the provision of social rent housing; homes affordable to key workers who deliver essential community services; support for the local economy; delivery of family homes; age-appropriate housing options, including homes that meet the needs of older residents; and both market and affordable homes designed for people with a range of accessibility needs, including wheelchair users.

Summary of July 2024 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (and 2025 Addendum)

8.57 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (July 2024) and the 2025 Addendum report that the Early Phases are expected to deliver approximately 1,674 new homes and 696 PBSA bed spaces, of which 624 homes and 696 PBSA bedspaces would be in LBHF and 1,050 homes would be in RBKC. These would make a significant contribution towards housing supply in both LBHF and RBKC. For LBHF, the proposed housing would help meet approximately 5.6 % of its housing target and for RBKC, it would help meet 23.4 % of its housing target. ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics identifies a

21 July 2024 Volume 1: Main Environmental Statement Report Chapter 7: Socio-Economics

22 Janet Ige et al., ‘The Relationship between Buildings and Health: A Systematic Review’, Journal of Public Health 41, no. 2 (1 June 2019): e121–32, https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy138.

23 H Shannon et al., ‘Web Annex A. Report of the Systematic Review on the Effect of Household Crowding on Health. In: WHO Housing and Health Guidelines.’ (World Health Organization, 2018).

24M MacLachlan et al., ‘Web Annex F. Report of the Systematic Review on Potential Benefits of Accessible Home Environments for People with Functional Impairments. In: WHO Housing and Health Guidelines.’ (World Health Organization, 2018), https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/275844/WHO-CED-PHE-18.07-eng.pdf

25 Adekunle Gregory Fakunle et al., ‘Association of Indoor Microbial Aerosols with Respiratory Symptoms among Under-Five Children: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis’, Environmental Health 20, no. 1 (1 July 2021): 77, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00759-2.

permanent, long term, direct, and major beneficial effect on housing need at the Borough level, which is significant in EIA terms.

Assessment of Health Effects

8.58 The vulnerable groups population sensitive receptors relevant to this assessment are:

• Children and young people;

• Older people;

• Social disadvantage (people experiencing discrimination for example due to low income);

• People with existing poor health (physical and mental); and

• People with access and geographical factors:

• Existing on-site occupants and those who reside in the local area.

8.59 The key health outcomes relevant to housing as a determinant of health are:

• Physical health and

• Mental health

8.60 In general, the scientific literature suggests housing quality exerts one of the strongest directly measurable effects on physical and mental health 22. The influence of housing on population health, particularly mental health, is strongly linked to community and environmental factors. The WHO specifies that dwellings must be large enough to comfortably accommodate people of different ages with sufficient space for privacy. The WHO has found a strong positive association between crowded housing and respiratory infections 23. The evidence also suggests that overcrowding may also be associated with poor mental health outcomes such as stress and depression 23

8.61 Adaptable homes that meet the needs of residents at different stages of their life are especially health-promoting. The literature suggests that people with disabilities living in accessible home environments have better health and wellbeing than those living in conventional or inaccessible home environments 24. Physical health benefits were also identified with adaptable homes, such as reductions in falls and injuries. Self-perceptions of increased quality of life and general wellbeing were found, along with psychological effects such as less fear of falling/accidents and reduced feeling of depression 24

8.62 The literature also highlights an association between housing conditions (including air quality, noise levels, thermal comfort, access to natural light, access to high quality and safe outdoor space) and health and wellbeing. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies in high-income countries found that microbial aerosol exposure (mould) in indoor air environments, including homes, was significantly associated with an increased risk of respiratory symptoms in children 25 Good quality housing that avoids such risks are therefore likely to be health promoting.

8.63 The WHO recognises residential noise as a potential health-harming housing condition. Specifically, noise impacts related to cardiovascular effects, annoyance and sleep disturbance (and consequences arising from inadequate rest) are considered the main pathways by which population health may be affected 26 Improving internal noise environments often involves additional insulation. Such insulation also has implications for ventilation and thermal regulation of indoor spaces. Thermal comfort is also dependant on affordable heating, which relates to the heating source as well as heat loss, for example from windows Findings from an ecological study that examined the associations between temperature, housing deprivation and excess winter mortality showed that lack of central heating could significantly increase the risk of excess winter deaths 27 Whilst designs to improve energy efficiency may reduce the number and size of windows, a balanced approach is needed as the evidence also suggests that inadequate home lighting is associated with likelihood of reporting depression 28 Good quality housing that has good sound insulation, ventilation, allows affordable thermal comfort and natural lighting is therefore likely to be health promoting.

8.64 The temporal scope for this potential effect is permanent and long-term.

26 Ang Li et al., ‘Environmental Noise Exposure and Mental Health: Evidence From a Population-Based Longitudinal Study’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 63, no. 2 (1 August 2022): e39–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.02.020; Eulalia Peris and Benjamin Fenech, ‘Associations and Effect Modification between Transportation Noise, Self-Reported Response to Noise and the Wider Determinants of Health: A Narrative Synthesis of the Literature’, Sci. Total Environ. 748 (15 December 2020): 141040, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141040

27 Ige et al., ‘The Relationship between Buildings and Health: A Systematic Review’.

28 Mary Jean Brown and David E. Jacobs, ‘Residential Light and Risk for Depression and Falls: Results from the LARES Study of Eight European Cities’, Public Health Reports 126, no. 1_suppl (May 2011): 131–40, https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549111260S117.

8.65

Source-Pathway-Receptor: A health effect is considered likely because, based on the methods described in the July 2024 ES Table 8.4, there is a plausible source-pathway-receptor relationship:

• Source – housing quantum, type, quality, conditions and connections

• Pathway – housing availability, affordability and conditions affecting physical and mental health

• Receptors – residents in the local communities including new and existing residents.

8.66 The effect is probable as no unusual conditions are required for the source-pathway-receptor linkage

8.67 Sensitivity of the receptor:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium. The population includes those with few resources and less capacity to adapt to housing market pressures.

• The sensitivity of the vulnerable groups is high. As shown in the Baseline Conditions section, the representative study area LSOAs in LBHF and RBKC include high proportions of children and young people and of people aged 65 and over. These groups may be dependants in housing terms, more vulnerable to housing conditions and more sensitive to house prices, e.g. young people as first-time-buyers or older people with state pension incomes These groups may particularly benefit from the housing opportunities being offered by the Early Phases including the proposed affordable, inclusive and accessible homes. Deprivation data also shows that most of the representative LSOAs in the study area are in IMD deciles 1 and 2 (most deprived), indicating high deprivation in the study area. Deprived populations may already face more access barriers to housing compared to the general population and therefore be more sensitive to access changes in local housing availability.

8.68 Magnitude of impact: As reported in July 2024 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (and 2025 Addendum), the Amended Proposed Development would provide approximately 1,674 new homes and 696 PBSA, including 35 % affordable housing, and a mix of housing types and size to increase housing choice. This would provide a range of benefits, including a diverse range of homes, catering to first time buyers, families, single person households, key workers and people requiring affordable homes. The proposed housing would offer homes that are adaptable i.e. homes with the flexibility to meet the changing needs of a lifetime and affordable homes that are distributed across the Site. The Early Phases would provide accessible housing in line with London Plan 2021 requirements, 10 % of homes would meet Building Regulation requirements M4(3) and the remaining 90 % would meet M4(2). The layout and design of the Amened Proposed Development would reduce the risk of social isolation through integration with the existing community, supported by the strategic placement of key amenities including the cultural venues, retail, focal and open play spaces. The new housing would be good quality and the dwellings would be to current sustainability and energy efficiency standards. As shown in the Energy Strategy (July 2024), the new homes would incorporate passive design strategies into building architecture and layout, which would reduce reliance on active heating, cooling, and lighting systems, thus minimising energy consumption and operational costs for future residents. For population health, the scale of change due to the Early Phases is considered to be medium and over the long-term. Such beneficial health effects would be permanent, in relation to mental health and wellbeing. The change is likely to affect a large minority of the Site and Local Level population, with potential for moderate changes in physical and mental health morbidity linked to living environment. The magnitude of the impact would be medium.

8.69 Scale, Nature and Significance of Health Effects: On the basis of the above considerations, the housing effects for the general population, during the completed development stage of the Early Phases, would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.70 For people in vulnerable groups, the housing effects, during the completed development stage of Early Phases, would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.71 This reflects that the literature establishes a clear relationship between housing availability, affordability, adaptability and health outcomes. The change in the population health baseline due to the Early Phases is likely to be small with an influential effect on health inequalities and delivery of health policy. The conclusion also takes into account that the Early Phases would include allocations for affordable housing that are inclusive and accessible.

Air Quality

8.73 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.74 As confirmed to Waterman, the references to demolition or excavated materials for the completed development stage (paragraphs 8.295, 8.298 and 8.299) were made in error. Additional commentary is provided with regard to the completed development air pollutant emissions sources that were considered in the July 2024 ES completed development assessment:

• A health effect is considered likely because there is a plausible source-pathway-receptor relationship: Sources of air quality health effects comprise–nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 µm (PM10) and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5), typically generated by road traffic and combustion engines emissions (for example emergency generators).

• Magnitude of Impact: ESChapter 10 and 10A: Air Quality reports on the modelling results of completed development air pollution sources, including traffic and the siting and potential use of emergency generators, and found these to have no discernible impact at ground level. ES Chapter 10A further confirms that exposures at elevations, e.g. building air intakes and balconies, would also not result in discernible impacts.

• The duration of the impacts would be long-term. The exposure would be very low and the potential change in quality of life and risk of respiratory morbidity would be minor. In terms of the IEMA Guidance a majority of the population in the Site would be affected and a small minority the Local area. This would be a direct effect and it would not be expected to lead to increased demand for health services. The magnitude of the impact would be low.

8.75 The Early Phases completed development public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The general population relevant to this assessment are the existing off-site population (residents, workers and visitors); and the future on-site occupants (residents, workers and visitors).

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium.

• The magnitude of impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES.

• On the basis of the above considerations, the Early Phases completed development air quality public health effects for the general population, would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.76 ES Chapter 17A: Climate has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.77 The Early Phases completed development public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The general population relevant to this assessment are the existing off-site population (residents, workers and visitors); and the future on-site occupants (residents, workers and visitors).

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of impact would be medium for on-site residents (Site level) and low for off-site residents (Local level) for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES.

• On the basis of the above considerations, the Early Phases completed development climate related public health effects for the general population, would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site level and Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Local level.

Noise and Vibration

8.72 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes the contribution of the life safety generators and road traffic emissions for which dispersion modelling has been undertaken. Incremental contributions to exceedances of the WHO AQG levels are noted in relation to non-threshold health effects and a consequent very limited influence on health outcomes. The Chapter 10A proposed approach to conditions for meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 are noted. Taking into account these factors, the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.78 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes the Chapter 11A assumption that there would be further assessment of completed development building services and industrial noise for each phase of the Amended Proposed Development; and these

would include developed mitigation that achieve appropriate noise limits, such that significant adverse effects would not arise

8.79 Consideration has also been given to the additional moderate adverse significant effect for a very few people in relation to redistributed road transport noise at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road (indicative receptor locations R04 and R06 in ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration) Such frequent and long-term individual level effects are acknowledged, including the role of chronic transport noise exposures being associated with a minor increase in risk factors for cardiovascular, cardio-metabolic and mental health morbidity, as well as quality of life outcomes. However, as these effects arise for very few people, the proposed amendments are not considered to give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups The approach to noise specifications, e.g. in relation to industrial and building services noise, being secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions is also noted and taken into account. Accordingly, the competed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. It is clarified that in July 2024 ES noise effects for the vulnerable group population conclusion relate to both the Site and Local levels.

8.80 As confirmed to Waterman, the reference to construction activities and transport operations for the completed development stage (paragraph 8.332) was made in error. The following is noted and was considered in undertaking the July 2024 ES noise and vibration assessment for human health:

• Source-Pathway-Receptor: A health effect is considered likely because, there is a plausible source-pathwayreceptor relationship: The source is completed development noise and vibration including road traffic, building services, ndustrial and commercial activities

8.81 The Early Phases completed development public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The general population relevant to this assessment are the existing off-site population (residents, workers and visitors); and the future on-site occupants (residents, workers and visitors).

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES.

• On the basis of the above considerations, the Early Phases completed development noise and vibration public health effects for the general population, would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Water Quality or Availability

8.82 ES Chapter 13A: Ground Conditions and ES Chapter 14A: Water Resources have been reviewed and the public health implications of their residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the completed development conclusion of no probable effect presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Diet and Nutrition

8.83 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.84 Additional clarifying text is provided in relation to the NPPF amendments described in the methodology section of this addendum chapter:

• In relation to the potential for any adverse population health effect, it is noted that the current NPPF paragraph 97 seeks to limit both hot-food takeaways and fast food outlets. Fast food outlets were defined in Public Health England’s ‘Obesity and the environment’ analysis as “energy dense food that is available quickly, therefore it covers a range of outlets that include, but are not limited to, burger bars, kebab and chicken shops, chip shops and pizza outlets”29. This has recently been affirmed in the Department for Health and Social Care Office for Health Improvement and Disparities publication30 Wider Determinants of Health: statistical commentary on the location of fast food outlets, February 2025’, which states “fast food has been defined as food that is energy dense and available quickly, usually via a counter service, and for consumption on or off the premises It covers a range of

29 Public Health England. Obesity and the environment. 2017. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5ba11e77ed915d2bb50f9eb0/Fast_Food_map.pdf [Accessed 07/07/2025]

outlets selling foods including, but not limited to: burgers; pizza; kebabs; chicken; Indian takeaway; Chinese takeaway; and fish and chips”. This is different from a hot-food takeaway and could include restaurant outlets that sell fast food, but which have not previously been controlled as they have indoor seating (so were not considered purely takeaways). NPPF paragraph 97 includes both the terms ‘hot food takeaway’ and ‘fast food outlet’, which suggests that these are intentionally distinguished. The Amended Proposed Development would be compliant in policy terms with NPPF paragraph 97 and this would be enforced by planning condition As such, the potential for a significant adverse population health effect associated with an obesogenic environment would be avoided. Action on promoting health diets is consistent with the priorities of the new NHS Plan ‘Fit for the future: 10 Year Health Plan for England’31

8.85 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development:

Health and Social Care Services

8.86 ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.87 The NPPF paragraph 101 directs that significant weight should be given to the importance of facilitating new, expanded or upgraded public service infrastructure, including health. The details of this are under discussion with the NHS via the ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics assessment and its ongoing post-submission consultation

8.88 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Community Safety

8.89 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.90 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Open Space, Leisure and Play

8.91 ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description has been reviewed and the public health implications of the proposed amendments considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. Accordingly, the competed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.92 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.93 Responding to a clarification request from Waterman, further discussion is provided as to how end uses may impact on community identity, culture, resilience and influence This relates to the integration of current and future communities, including through co-use of facilities and opportunities

8.94 The completed development stage of the Early Phases is expected to provide a wide range of infrastructure that builds community and promotes culture including three cultural venues, community facilities and focal points across the Site , secured through s106 agreement

8.95 The general population (sensitive receptors) relevant to this assessment are existing off-site population: residents, workers and visitors; and future on-site occupants: residents; non-residential workers; and visitors.

8.96 The vulnerable population groups (sensitive receptors) relevant to this assessment are: • Children and young people;

30 Office for Health Improvement & Disparities. Wider Determinants of Health: statistical commentary on the location of fast food outlets, February 2025. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/wider-determinants-of-health-february-2025-update/wider-determinants-of-health-statistical-commentary-february-2025 [Accessed 07/07/2025]

31 UK Government, NHS. July 2025. Fit for the Future. 10 Year Health Plan for England. ISBN 978-1-5286-5807-2

• Parents and carers;

• Older people; and

• Social disadvantaged people (experiencing discrimination for example due ethnicity, sexuality, gender; social isolation; low income).

8.97 The key health outcomes relevant to community identity, culture, resilience and influence are:

• Physical health (see below); and

• Mental health and well-being.

8.98 Places and locations hold meanings and memories for people. The ways in which people are able to relate to, access and enjoy these places and locations are important for mental health and well-being32. Cognitive social capital (i.e. shared norms, values, attitudes, and beliefs, predisposes people towards mutually beneficial collective action) is protective, at the individual and community level, against developing common mental disorders 33

8.99 Neighbourhood context contributes to how people seek help when they suffer mental illness Research has found that people who live in a neighbourhood with a communicative atmosphere, i.e. one where neighbours who don’t know each other well exchange a few positive words on a regular basis, tend to have significantly better help-seeking intentions to overcome mental health challenges 34 Favourable psychosocial environments support positive social interactions, reducing stress and promoting healthy behaviours. Children and young people from neighbourhood environments that are considered to have fewer psychosocial advantages (such as low social capital, social resources and social cohesion) may shoulder a disproportionately high burden of physical and psychological ill health35

8.100 Source-Pathway-Receptor: A potential health effect is considered likely because there is a plausible source-pathwayreceptor relationship where:

• Source: spaces, facilities and connections that build community identity, culture and resilience

• Pathway: changes in community identity due to a changing relationship with the Site and the character of the Site.

• Receptors – the general population and vulnerable groups population of the Site and surrounding communities

8.101 The potential effect is probable as no unusual conditions are required for the source-pathway-receptor linkage.

8.102 The sensitivity conclusions presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. The sensitivity of the general population is considered to be medium. The sensitivity of the vulnerable groups (collectively assessed) is considered to be high.

8.103 Magnitude of impact: As shown in the DAS, the completed development stage of the Early Phases would draw on the Site’s historic and cultural history to deliver vibrant network of public spaces that foster connection, creativity and inclusivity. Key spaces such as the Warwick Square, the Table, and the southern half of Aisgill Gardens would celebrate the Site’s history and provide focal points for cultural expression and community gatherings, strengthening local identity and culture. Reflecting the Site’s rich heritage, Empress Place would offer a street incorporating cultural uses, featuring a boulevard lined with active uses and punctuated by a culture venue at the south of the park. The Crescent would be a flexible venue for performance and music. The Exhibition Gardens would be a designated space for culture and creativity outdoors. The Design Code seeks to deliver a design that would integrate flexible cultural venues and outdoor spaces designed for co-creation, seasonal art and heritage. Implementation of the Earls Court Development sitewide art strategy, as shown in the DAS would ensure continuous engagement, storytelling and collaboration with local artists and communities. Integrating affordable housing ensures a diverse community, promoting inclusivity and equality. Diversity may lead to a stronger collective identity in the existing and new community.

8.104 The introduction of new residents may also impact community identity. The introduction of a new population in the study area may bring cultural and demographic shifts, influencing social dynamics and new traditions. While this may enhance diversity and economic vitality, it may also create challenges in social cohesion. The Amended Proposed Development’s detailed design and ongoing community engagement would play a key role in fostering a sense of belonging and mitigating any potential tensions. The Earls Court Community Centre would be relocated from its current meanwhile

32 Cathy Baldwin, ‘Assessing Impacts on People’s Relationships to Place and Community in Health Impact Assessment: An Anthropological Approach’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 33, no. 2 (3 April 2015): 154–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.983725

33 Annahita Ehsan et al., ‘Social Capital and Health: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews’, SSM - Population Health 8 (August 2019): 100425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100425

34Machi Suka, Takashi Yamauchi, and Hiroki Sugimori, ‘Relationship between Individual Characteristics, Neighbourhood Contexts and Help-Seeking Intentions for Mental Illness’, BMJ Open 5, no. 8 (1 August 2015): e008261, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008261

35 Matt Egan et al., ‘Psychosocial Risk Factors in Home and Community Settings and Their Associations with Population Health and Health Inequalities: A Systematic MetaReview’, BMC Public Health 8, no. 1 (December 2008): 239, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-239.

location to new community facilities as part of the development of the Detailed Component – thus providing, an essential connection for community integration and outreach activity.

8.105 The impact of the proposed change can be characterised as of medium scale for the context, experienced frequently over a long-term duration. The predominant health outcome change due to the Amended Proposed Development relates to quality of life for a minority of the population, particularly the Site Level population. The direction of change in health outcomes due to the amended Proposed Development would be beneficial (an improvement) and the most relevant outcome is mental health. The effects are likely to be spread across a wider area and are most likely to affect both existing residents and the future residents of the Amended Proposed Development. Based on the degree of change and how it is distributed in the population, including vulnerable groups or areas, there is likely to be a narrowing (improving) health inequalities. The magnitude of the impact would be medium.

8.106 These additional consideration have been included in the analysis and the significance conclusions remain as presented in the July 2024 ES Therefore, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.107 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.108 Responding to a clarification request from Waterman, further discussion is provided as to how end uses may impact on social participation, interaction and support. This also relates to the integration of current and future communities, including through co-use of facilities and opportunities.

8.109 The general population (sensitive receptors) relevant to this assessment are existing off-site population: residents, workers and visitors; and future on-site occupants: residents; non-residential workers; and visitors.

8.110 The vulnerable population groups (sensitive receptors) relevant to this assessment are:

• Children and young people;

• Parents and carers;

• Older people; and

• Social disadvantaged people (experiencing discrimination for example due ethnicity, sexuality, gender; social isolation; low income).

8.111 The key health outcomes relevant to community identity, culture, resilience and influence are:

• Physical health (see below); and

• Mental health and well-being.

8.112 The key health outcomes directly relevant to social participation, interaction and support are mental health and wellbeing. Indirect outcomes are a range of improved physical and mental health associated with increased support as well as improved health literacy.

8.113 Participation is central to building new communities and social infrastructure36, and to improving health equity37. It is also important for mental wellbeing and social capital. A study in Australia reported that greater community participation in one year was linked to better mental wellbeing the next year38

8.114 Source-Pathway-Receptor: A potential health effect is considered likely because, based on the methods described in Table 8.5, there is a plausible source-pathway-receptor relationship where:

• Sources –community participation and interaction, and for social and family support, community meeting places, volunteering opportunities, social support and networks;

• Pathway – opportunities for the above; and

36 Hollis, H., et al. 2023. Space for community: strengthening our social infrastructure. Institute for Community Studies, Bennett Institute for Public Policy. Available at: https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/space-for-community-strengthening-our-social-infrastructure/ [accessed on 6/05/2024]

37 Hirono, K. 2023. Participation for health equity: a comparison of citizens’ juries and health impact assessment. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1842/40687 [accessed on 6/05/2024]

38 Ding, N. et al. 2015. One-year reciprocal relationship between community participation and mental wellbeing in Australia: A panel analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.022 [accessed on 6/05/2024]

• Receptors – the general population and vulnerable groups population.

8.115 The potential effect is probable as no unusual conditions are required for the source-pathway-receptor linkage.

8.116 The sensitivity conclusions presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. The sensitivity of the general population is considered to be medium. The sensitivity of the vulnerable groups (collectively assessed) is considered to be high.

8.117 Magnitude of Impact: As shown in the DAS, the completed development stage of the Early Phases would support and enhance social participation, interaction, and support by creating a network of inclusive, accessible, and engaging spaces that bring people together across ages, backgrounds, and interests. By embedding cultural venues, public art, and heritage features into the public realm, it fosters shared experiences and strengthens community ties. Public spaces such as those expected at Warwick Square, the Table Park, Empress Place, community facilities and the Warwick Crescent would provide space for events, performances, exhibitions, facilitating community gatherings and social interaction. Open green spaces, play areas and destination gardens, designed for all ages would encourage intergenerational interaction, and serve as natural gathering places for informal connection, events, and recreation. A range of cafés and restaurants throughout the Amended Proposed Development would provide everyday social anchors including spaces for meeting, resting, and engaging with others. These layered elements, combined with community facilities, flexible event spaces, and an inclusive housing mix would promote regular social interaction, creating a socially resilient and connected neighbourhood

8.118 A medium scale of change is anticipated that would be experienced frequently over the long-term. The predominant health outcomes relate to quality of life and risk of mental health morbidness, e.g. due to social isolation. Effects are likely to be positive and extend to a large minority of the current and future residents, particularly in the Site Level population. Based on the degree of change and how it is distributed in the population, including vulnerable groups or areas, there is likely to be a marginal impact in narrowing (improving) health inequalities. The magnitude of the impact would be medium

8.119 These additional considerations have been included in the analysis and the significance conclusions remain as presented in the July 2024 ES Therefore the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.120 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The transport influences are both beneficial and adverse. The beneficial effects would be the same as set out in July 2024 ES. The potential for additional adverse influences has also been considered based on ES Chapter 9A

8.121 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes effects in relation to severance, pedestrian and cyclist delay, pedestrian and cyclist amenity, pedestrian fear and intimidation, driver delay, accident and safety effects, and parking and service demand effects. The significant adverse effect in relation to driver delay at a limited number of locations is noted. It is also noted that these delays arise partly due to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, including in mitigating against a significant effect to accident and safety risks

8.122 For population health the changes would relate to small changes in some health-related journey times and a reduced but very small change in risk factors for injury risk and morbidity and mortality outcomes for a very few people associated with traffic accidents and any delay in receipt of emergency care. Such one-off individual level effects even over the long-term are not likely to result in significant public health effects at a population-level, or discernible changes in healthcare service demand. A very limited change in the health baseline would be expected from these adverse elements.

8.123 The magnitude of the impact would be high and relate to the beneficial influences on walking and cycling described and assessed using the WHO HEAT tool in the July 2024 health assessment.

8.124 Accordingly, the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.125 The additional findings of ES Chapter 9A have been considered and the significance conclusions remain as presented in the July 2024 ES

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Air Quality

8.126 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes the contribution of the life safety generators and road traffic emissions for which dispersion modelling has been undertaken. Incremental contributions to exceedances of the WHO AQG levels are noted in relation to non-threshold health effects and a consequent very limited influence on health outcomes. The Chapter 10A proposed approach to conditions for meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 are noted. The contribution from the Amended Proposed Development would be incremental and relate to a very minor contribution to risk factors for respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity. Given the many other sources in the urban context a small effect on the health baseline would be expected. As such, the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.127 Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects for vulnerable groups presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.128 The All Phases demolition and construction public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium and the sensitivity of the vulnerable groups, collectively assessed, is high.

• The magnitude of the impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in the July 2024 ES

• On the basis of the considerations set out in the assessment of the All Phases demolition and construction stage, the air quality public health effects for the general population, would be temporary, short- to medium-term, MinorModerate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.129 ES Chapter 17A: Climate has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.130 Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects for vulnerable groups presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.131 The All Phases demolition and construction public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of the impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in the July 2024 ES.

• On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the climate change effects, during the construction and demotion of the All Phases scenario, would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct MinorModerate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Noise and Vibration

8.132 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered.

8.133 This includes that changes in road traffic noise would occur during the demolition and construction stage are expected to result in temporary, reversible, short- to medium-term, direct, and Moderate Adverse effects (significant) at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road and Beaumont Avenue (indicative receptor locations R04, R06, R20, R21, R22 and NR06 in ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration) As significant adverse noise effects were already predicted in the July 2024 submission for the same study area, the proposed amendments are not considered to give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.134 Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. It is clarified that in July 2024 ES noise effects for the vulnerable group population conclusion relate to both the Site and Local levels.

8.135 The All Phases demolition and construction public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of the impact would be medium for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES

• On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the noise effects during the construction and demolition of the All Phases, would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not-significant) at the Site and Local levels

Land Quality

8.136 ES Chapter 13A: Ground Conditions has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups Accordingly, the demolition and construction conclusion of no probable effect presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Water Quality or Availability

8.137 ES Chapters 13A: Ground Conditions and Chapter 14A: Water Resources have been reviewed and the public health implications of their residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups Accordingly, the demolition and construction conclusion of no probable effect presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.138 ES Chapter 2A: Townscape and Visual has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups The All Phases demolition and construction public health effects would be the same as set out in July 2024 ES

8.139 In response to Waterman post-submission comments the following additional commentary is provided on meanwhile uses for both the general and vulnerable population groups:

• With regard to the assessment of potential effects on the general population and on vulnerable population groups, the assessment of All Phases demolition and construction effects remains as described in the Early Phases demolition and construction stage assessment.

• Accordingly, for the general population, the community identity, culture, resilience and influence effects during the demolition and construction stage of All Phases would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

• For the vulnerable population, the Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence effects during the demolition and construction stage of the All Phases would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate - Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.140 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.141 In response to Waterman post-submission comments the following additional commentary is provided for both the general and vulnerable population groups:

• With regard to the assessment of potential effects on the general population and on vulnerable population groups, the assessment of All Phases demolition and construction effects remains as described in the Early Phases demolition and construction stage assessment.

• For the general population, the Social Participation, Interaction and Support effects during the demolition and construction stage of All Phases would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

• For the vulnerable population, the social participation, interaction and support effects during the demolition and construction stage of All Phases would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.142 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes effects in relation to severance, pedestrian and cyclist delay, pedestrian and cyclist amenity, pedestrian fear and intimidation, driver delay, accident and safety effects, and parking and service demand effects. The Amended Proposed Developments traffic management measures in the CEMP and CTLP would be expected to reduce effects, such that a very limited change in the health baseline would be expected. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Completed Development Effects

Housing

8.143 Table 8.3N in the Early Phases part of this addendum provides signposting to the coverage of housing in other parts of the submission documents. These include information on how the Amended Proposed Development responds to build quality, dwelling mix and connection with existing communities. Further information and assessment is set out within this section.

Summary of the Housing Statements for RBKC and LBHF

8.144 The summary of the Housing Statements for RBKC and LBHF remains as described in the Early Phases completed development stage assessment above.

Summary of ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (and 2025 Addendum)

8.145 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (July 2024) identifies a permanent, long term, direct, and major beneficial effect on housing need at the Borough level, which is significant in EIA terms.

8.146 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (July 2024) and the 2025 Addendum report that the All Phases are expected to deliver 3,050 homes. These would make a significant contribution towards housing supply in both LBHF and RBKC. The amended All Phases housing delivery would therefore contribute an increase of 400 homes within the LBHF element of the Site compared to the July 2024 ES For LBHF, the proposed housing would help to meet approximately 14.2 % of its housing target and for RBKC it would help to meet 23.4 % of its housing target. The effect of the All Phases on housing delivery would remain as major beneficial effect as identified in the July 2024 ES Chapter 7.

Assessment of Health Effects

8.147 With regard to the assessment of potential effect on vulnerable population groups, the assessment of All Phases completed development effects remains as described in the Early Phases completed development stage assessment.

8.148 The sensitivity of the general population is medium and the sensitivity of the vulnerable groups, collectively assessed, is high.

8.149 Magnitude of Impact: As reported in July 2024 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics (and 2025 Addendum), the Proposed Development will provide 3,050 new homes and 696 PBSA, including 35 % affordable housing, and a mix of housing types and size to increase housing choice. As described in the completed development stage of the Early Phases, the completed stage of the All Phases would provide a range of benefits in relation to housing (see the Housing section for the completed development stage of the Early Phases). At the completed development stage of the All Phases scenario, the change in housing quality and availability in RBKC and LBHF is likely to be at a large scale and over the long term. The change is likely to affect a large minority of the Site and Local level population, with potential for moderate changes in physical and mental health morbidity linked to living environment. The magnitude of the impact would be high

8.150 Scale, Nature and Significance of Health Effects: On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population the housing effects during the completed development stage of the All Phases would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.151 For people in vulnerable groups, the housing effects of the All Phases would be permanent, long-term, direct Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.152 This reflects that the literature establishes a clear relationship between housing availability, affordability, adaptability and health outcomes. The change in the population health baseline due to the All Phases is likely to be medium with an influential effect on health inequalities and delivery of health policy. The conclusion is driven by the inclusion at scale of affordable good quality housing that is inclusive and accessible.

Air Quality

8.153 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes the contribution of the life safety generators and road traffic emissions for which dispersion modelling has been undertaken. Incremental contributions to exceedances of the WHO AQG levels are noted in relation to non-threshold health effects and a consequent very limited influence on health outcomes. The Chapter 10A proposed approach to conditions for meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 are noted. Taking into account these factors, proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.154 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

8.155 The All Phases completed development public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of the impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in the July 2024

• On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the air quality effects during the completed development stage of the All Phases scenario would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.156 ES Chapter 17A: Climate has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.157 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

8.158 The All Phases completed development public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of the impact would be medium for on-site residents (Site level) and low for off-site residents (Local level).

• On the basis of the above considerations, the All Phases completed development climate related public health effects for the general population would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site level and Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Local level

Noise and Vibration

8.159 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered.

8.160 Consideration has also been given to the additional moderate adverse significant effects for a very few people in relation to redistributed road transport noise at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road; and Hogarth Road. Such frequent and long-term individual level effects are acknowledged, including the role of chronic transport noise exposures being associated with a minor increase in risk factors for cardiovascular, cardio-metabolic and mental health morbidity, as well as quality of life outcomes. However, as these effects arise for very few people, the proposed amendments are not considered to give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups. The approach to noise specifications, e.g. in relation to industrial and building services noise, being secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions is also noted and taken into account.

8.161 Accordingly, the competed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. It is clarified that in July 2024 ES noise effects for the vulnerable group population conclusion relate to both the Site and Local levels

8.162 The All Phases completed development public health effects on the general population would be as follows:

• The sensitivity of the general population is medium

• The magnitude of the impact would be low for the same reasons as set out in July 2024 ES

• On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the noise effects during the completed development stage of the All Phases scenario would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Water Quality or Availability

8.163 ES Chapters 13A: Ground Conditions and Chapter 14A: Water Resources have been reviewed and the public health implications of their residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups Accordingly, the completed development conclusion of no probable effect presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Diet and Nutrition

8.164 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.165 Additional clarifying text is provided in relation to the NPPF amendments described in the methodology section of this addendum chapter:

• With regard to the assessment of potential effects on the general population and on vulnerable population groups, the assessment of All Phases competed development diet and nutrition effects remains as described in the Early Phases completed development stage assessment

• For the general population, the diet and nutrition effects in the All Phases would be short- to medium-term, direct Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

• For the vulnerable population, the diet and nutrition effects in the All Phases would be long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.166 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Health and Social Care Services

8.167 ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.168 Additional clarification on NPPF paragraph 101 is noted as for the Early Phases scenario health and social care services completed development assessment.

8.169 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development:

Community Safety

8.170 The completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

Open Space, Leisure and Play

8.171 ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description has been reviewed and the public health implications of the proposed amendments considered. The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.172 Accordingly, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development: Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.173 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.174 Responding to a clarification request from Waterman further discussion is provided as to how end uses may impact on community identity, culture, resilience and influence. This relates to the integration of current and future communities, including through co-use of facilities and opportunities. The additional considerations included for the Early Phases completed development scenario apply to the All Phases scenario.

8.175 Furthermore, additional facilities that build community identity and culture would be provided in the All Phases scenario including the remainder of Aisgill Gardens, Lillie Sidings Square and the repurposed Train Shed at Lillie Sidings. It is intended that the Lillie Sidings square would comprise of a re-imagined rail depot and a new public square at the centre of a vibrant mixed use quarter. The Train Shed would provide a cultural venue. The magnitude of impact is medium.

8.176 These additional considerations have been included in the analysis and the significance conclusions remain as presented in the July 2024 ES: Therefore, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.177 The proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups.

8.178 Responding to a clarification request from Waterman further discussion is provided as to how end uses may impact on community identity, culture, resilience and influence. This relates to the integration of current and future communities, including through co-use of facilities and opportunities. The additional considerations included for the Early Phases completed development scenario apply to the All Phases scenario.

8.179 Furthermore, additional areas of public facilities that promote social participation and interaction would be provided at the All Phases including the remainder of Aisgill Gardens, Lillie Sidings Square and the repurposed Train Shed at Lillie Sidings. The magnitude of impact remains medium.

8.180 These additional considerations have been included in the analysis and the significance conclusions remain as presented in the July 2024 ES: Therefore, the completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.181 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. The transport influences are both beneficial and adverse. The beneficial effects would be the same as set out in July 2024 ES. The potential for additional adverse influences has also been considered based on ES Chapter 9A

8.182 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility has been reviewed and the public health implications of its residual effect conclusions considered. This includes effects in relation to severance, pedestrian and cyclist delay, pedestrian and cyclist amenity, pedestrian fear and intimidation, driver delay, accident and safety effects, and parking and service demand effects. The significant adverse effect in relation to driver delay at a limited number of locations is noted. It is also noted that these delays arise partly due to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, including in mitigating against a significant effect to accident and safety risks.

8.183 For population health the changes would relate to small changes in some health-related journey times and a very small change in risk factors for injury risk and morbidity and mortality outcomes for a very few people associated with traffic accidents and any delay in receipt of emergency care. Such one-off individual level effects even over the long-term are not likely to result in significant public health effects at a population-level, or discernible changes in healthcare service demand. A very limited change in the health baseline would be expected from these adverse elements.

8.184 The magnitude of the impact would be high and relate to the beneficial influences on walking and cycling described and assessed using the WHO HEAT tool in the July 2024 health assessment.

8.185 Accordingly, the proposed amendments are not of a scale that would give rise to materially different public health effects, including for vulnerable groups

8.186 These additional considerations have been included in the analysis and the significance conclusions remain as presented in the July 2024 ES.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

8.187 No additional mitigation is required, and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

8.188 However, account is taken of measures presented in other ES Addendum topic chapters, for example Chapter 6A: Air Quality discussion of WHO 2021 AQG levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 being used as trigger level mitigation for certain land uses within the completed development stage

Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

8.189 As no additional mitigation would be required, the residual demolition and construction effects remain as reported in the Assessment of Effects section

Completed Development Residual Effects

8.190 As no additional mitigation would be required, the residual demolition and construction effects remain as reported in the Assessment of Effects section.

All Phases

8.191 No additional mitigation is required and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

8.192 However, account is taken of measures presented in other ES Addendum topic chapters, for example Chapter 6A: Air Quality discussion of WHO 2021 AQG levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 being used as trigger level mitigation for certain land uses within the completed development stage

Summary of Residual Effects

8.193 The summary of residual effects in Table 8.29 of the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development The results for the general population assessed in this addendum are presented in Table 8A.92A.

Table 8A.29A: Amended Summary of Human Health Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect **

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction

Air Quality

General Population

Demolition and construction dust and vehicle emissions

(not significant)

of Residual Effect*

Table 8A.29A: Amended Summary of Human Health Residual Effects

Receptor

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation General Population

Noise and Vibration General Population

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence General Population

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence Vulnerable Population

Social Participation, Interaction and Support General Population

Social Participation, Interaction and Support Vulnerable Population

Effects arising from extreme weather events.

Demolition and construction noise and vibration

Changes in community identity due to disruption to, or loss of, on-site uses and facilities

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

Community participation and interaction due to reduction in the psychosocial environment

Completed Development

Housing General Population Provision of new homes

Housing Vulnerable Groups Population Provision of new homes.

Air Quality General Population Emergency generator emissions, road traffic emissions and air quality neutral

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation - Local

level General Population Effects arising from extreme weather events.

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation - Site level General Population Effects arising from extreme weather events.

(not significant)

(not significant)

Table 8A.29A: Amended Summary of Human Health Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect

Noise and Vibration

General Population

Road traffic noise, building services noise and commercial activities noise

All Phases

Demolition and Construction

Air Quality General Population Demolition and construction dust and vehicle emissions

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

General Population

Noise and Vibration

Effects arising from extreme weather events.

General Population Demolition and construction noise and vibration

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence General Population

Changes in community identity due to disruption to, or loss of, on-site uses and facilities

(not significant)

(significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence Vulnerable Population

Social Participation, Interaction and Support General Population

Social Participation, Interaction and Support Vulnerable Population

Community participation and interaction due to reduction in the psychosocial environment

Completed Development

Housing General Population Provision of new homes

Housing Vulnerable Groups Population Provision of new homes

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

(significant)

(significant)

Chapter 8A: Health

Table 8A.29A: Amended Summary of Human Health Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect

Air Quality Emergency generator emissions, road traffic emissions and air quality neutral

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation – Site level General Population Effects arising from extreme weather events.

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Local level General Population Effects arising from extreme weather events.

Noise and Vibration General Population Road traffic noise, building services noise and commercial activities noise

Notes:

(not significant)

Moderate (not significant)

Inter-Project Effects

8.195 In respect of paragraph 575 of the July 2024 ES, the assessment approach presented in the July 2024 ES is clarified as follows as requested by Waterman:

• The following chapters have been reviewed and cross-referred to where inter-project cumulative effects have been reported:

ES Chapter 7 and 7A: Socio-Economics;

ES Chapter 9 and 9A: Transport and Accessibility;

ES Chapter 10 and 10A: Air Quality;

ES Chapter 11 and 11A: Noise and Vibration.

• As confirmed at paragraph 8.42 of the assessment method section in the July 2024 ES, climate has been scoped out of this assessment

• In respect of transport trips and associated air quality and noise emissions, these are inherently cumulative assessments as the future baseline accounts for background growth.

• In order to avoid double counting, the assessment of the Amended Proposed Development inter-project effects does not duplicate detail set out in other ES chapters.

(not significant)

(not significant)

* - = Adverse/ + = Beneficial/ +/- = Neutral; D = Direct/ I = Indirect; P = Permanent/ T = Temporary; R = Reversible/ IR = Irreversible; St = Short-term/ Mt = Medium-term/ Lt = Long-term.

**Negligible/Minor/Moderate/Major

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

8.194 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. The valid effects and the additional effects reported for the general population are considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects.

Table 8A.28R: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Human Health Effects

• The 17 cumulative schemes considered in the July 2024 ES remain valid. In addition, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme

• LPA planning portals were reviewed to obtain any available health impact assessment information for the cumulative schemes.

8.196 Table 8A.28R provides an updated screening exercise of the likely cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and 18 cumulative schemes.

8.197 In the absence of publicly available health impact assessments for all but two of the 18 cumulative schemes, the interproject cumulative assessment is inherently limited/constrained. Furthermore the two cumulative schemes which focused on a socio-economic amenities and infrastructure based consideration of health (with supporting Annex HUDU health impact assessment tool), are not comparable with the health determinants considered in the July 2024 ES and in this 2025 ES Addendum.

8.198 The July 2024 ES stated that inter-project cumulative assessment could not be determined for the 15 schemes and only focussed on the two schemes where limited health information was available. This remains the case for the Amended Proposed Development. However, to be helpful, professional judgement and experience has been applied in updating the screening summary in Table 8A.2R and the assessment of cumulative effects, to a proportionate degree.

8.199 For population health it is noted that a high degree of spatial proximity is required for there to be the potential for cumulative effects for localised changes in determinants of health, (e.g. 100 m for dust from a construction site). In contrast, where there are more far-reaching effects in a determinant of health, (e.g., job creation or noise along shared transport corridors) there is greater opportunity for cumulative interactions between projects, albeit typically spread more diffusely across a larger population

Early Phases

1 Land to the rear of 1 Cluny Mews, and 5163 Philbeach Gardens, London, SW5

No

None identified

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinant: cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

Table 8A.28R: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Human Health Effects

Cumulative Scheme

Cumulative Effects Likely?

2 100 West Cromwell Road, London, W14 8PB

Demolition and Construction

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

3 257-265 Kensington High Street, and 4-10 and 24 Earl's Court Road, London, W8 Yes As identified in:

4 Fulham Gasworks, Imperial Road, SW6 2AD

8 Edith Summerskill House Clem Attlee Court Lillie Road, London SW6 7TD

9 St Pauls Girls School Brook Green, London, W6 7BS

5 Olympia Exhibition Centre, Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UX (including the Maclise Road Multi Storey Car Park)

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

6 Maclise Multi-Storey Car Park (MSCP) Olympia Exhibition Centre Hammersmith Road London, W14 8UX Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2021/04167/FUL

7 Former West London Magistrate's Court, 181 Talgarth Road, London W6 8DN Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

12 43 Brook Green London W6 7EF

14 Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

10 Car, Coach and Lorry Park and 20 Seagrave Road, Diary House and Adjoining Electricity Substation Roxby Place London

None identified

Completed Development

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Transport and Accessibility

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

Potentially As identified in:

• Noise and Vibration

Table 8A 28R: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Human Health Effects

Cumulative Scheme

SW6 (known as ‘“Lillie Square’”) (Phases 1 and 2)

Lillie Square (Phase 3)

11 1 - 9 Lillie Road, Part of Diary House, Roxby Place and Land Adjacent to the Railway Tracks, London SW6

13 68-72 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

15 Landmark House Hammersmith Bridge Road London W6 9EJ

16 The Triangle (5-17 Hammersmith Grove) and Britannia House (1-11 Glenthorne Road), 3 and 3A Hammersmith Grove and 12-18 Beadon Road, Hammersmith, London W6 0LH

17 70-80 Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TN

18 Mund Street, 103 Gibbs, Green Close, London, W14 9NE

Demolition and Construction

Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Noise and Vibration

Completed Development

Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

Table 8A.28R: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Human Health Effects

Cumulative Scheme

All Phases

1 Land to the rear of 1 Cluny Mews, and 5163 Philbeach Gardens, London, SW5

Demolition and Construction

identified Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Completed Development

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

2 100 West Cromwell Road, London, W14 8PB Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

3 257-265 Kensington High Street, and 4-10 and 24 Earl's Court Road, London, W8 Yes As identified in:

4 Fulham Gasworks, Imperial Road, SW6 2AD

8 Edith Summerskill House Clem Attlee Court Lillie Road, London SW6 7TD

9 St Pauls Girls School Brook Green, London, W6 7BS

5 Olympia Exhibition Centre, Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UX (including the Maclise Road Multi Storey Car Park)

6 Maclise Multi-Storey Car Park (MSCP)

Olympia Exhibition Centre Hammersmith Road London, W14 8UX

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Transport and Accessibility

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Diet and Nutrition

• Community Safety Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Planning application 2018/03100/FUL

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

Table 8A 28R: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Human Health Effects

Cumulative Scheme

Effects Likely?

7 Former West London Magistrate's Court, 181 Talgarth Road, London W6 8DN

12 43 Brook Green London W6 7EF

14 Kensington Centre, 66 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

10 Car, Coach and Lorry Park and 20 Seagrave Road, Diary House and Adjoining Electricity Substation Roxby Place London SW6 (known as ‘“Lillie Square’”) (Phases 1 and 2)

Lillie Square (Phase 3)

Demolition and Construction

As identified in: • Socio-Economics

identified

As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

11 1 - 9 Lillie Road, Part of Diary House, Roxby Place and Land Adjacent to the Railway Tracks, London SW6 Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

13 68-72 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD

15 Landmark House Hammersmith Bridge Road London W6 9EJ

16 The Triangle (5-17 Hammersmith Grove) and Britannia House (1-11 Glenthorne Road), 3 and 3A Hammersmith Grove and 12-18 Beadon Road, Hammersmith, London W6 0LH

Completed Development

As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

As identified in:

• Noise and Vibration

As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support Yes As identified in:

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

• Socio-Economics

• Noise and Vibration

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Diet and Nutrition

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• Socio-Economics

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

Yes Yes

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Social Participation, Interaction and Support

• Community Safety

• Diet and Nutrition

Table 8A.28R: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Human Health Effects

Cumulative Scheme

Demolition and Construction

Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely?

17 70-80 Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TN Yes

18 Mund Street, 103 Gibbs, Green Close, London, W14 9NE Yes As identified in:

• All ES chapters

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

Air Quality

8.200 ES Chapter 10: Air Quality concludes that:

• significant cumulative effects as a result of demolition and construction dust are unlikely to occur as each scheme is anticipated to employ standard dust and construction mitigation in accordance with standard best practice and relevant guidance such that the individual demolition and construction stage effects would not be significant, in isolation or in combination;

• cumulative effects from demolition and construction dust impacts would be consistent with the air quality residual effects and would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, adverse Not Significant

• traffic flows associated with cumulative schemes have been included in the assessed traffic data through a background growth factor. Road traffic cumulative effects on air quality are not predicted to be significant at existing sensitive receptors for the Early Phases demolition and construction stage and completed development stage when assessed against the NAQOs.

• demolition and construction stage road traffic cumulative effects on air quality would be consistent with the airquality residual effects and would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, adverse and not significant.

8.201 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality concludes that the Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development cumulative effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

8.202 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, medium-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the 2025 ES Addendum Early Phases Assessment of effects.

8.203 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects.

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.204 Inter-project cumulative effects were scoped out of the July 2024 ES and in the addendum climate assessment.

8.205 As there are no cumulative effects identified, a cumulative health effect in relation to climate is not considered probable.

Noise and Vibration

8.206 ES Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration concludes that:

• the daytime demolition and construction residual noise from the Early Phases on receptor groupings R03 to R05 (closest to the cumulative scheme at 1-9 Lillie Road) would not be significant following the adoption of additional mitigation. Demolition and construction noise from the cumulative scheme and demolition and construction noise from the Early Phases would affect different facades of these receptor groups. Therefore, should demolition and

Yes

• Open Space, Leisure and Play

Yes As identified in:

• All addendum ES chapters

Health determinants cumulatively influenced:

• Community Safety

construction noise from the two schemes occur at the same time, the residual effects are not expected to be different to the noise residual effects. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

• no additional significant cumulative effects are expected from the 100 West Cromwell cumulative scheme.

8.207 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration concludes that:

• the residual cumulative effects of daytime demolition and construction noise from the Early Phases are expected to be temporary, short-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant).

• the residual night-time demolition and construction noise effects from the Early Phases are expected to be temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant).

• the residual demolition and construction vibration effects from the Early Phases are expected to be temporary, short-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant).

• the development programme of the Mund Street cumulative scheme is not known. However it has been assumed, in accordance with standard practice, that this scheme would prepare and implement a CEMP to avoid and minimise significant adverse effects to early occupied units of the Early Phases. Accordingly, no additional combined significant effects are expected to arise.

8.208 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the 2025 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects.

8.209 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Moderate-Major Adverse (significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects

Land Quality

8.210 Inter-project cumulative effects were scoped out of the July 2024 ES and the addendum ground conditions assessment. The majority of the Site has been subject to historical investigation as part of the Consented Scheme, including the demolition of the previous Earls Court Exhibition Centres. It is therefore well understood from a contamination perspective.

8.211 As there are no cumulative effects identified, the cumulative health effect in relation to land quality is not considered probable

Water Quality or Availability

8.212 ES Chapter 14: Water Resources states that a review of the cumulative schemes has concluded that there would be no significant cumulative adverse effects in relation water resources.

8.213 ES Chapter 14A: Water Resources concludes that there are no changes to the list of cumulative schemes which alter the effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES. Consequently, the inter-project cumulative effects reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

8.214 As there are no cumulative effects identified, the cumulative health effect is not considered probable.

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.215 During the Early Phases demolition and construction period, there are 13 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to contribute to changes in community identity, culture, resilience and influence

8.216 While each of these schemes would progress independently, their construction timelines have the potential to generate cumulative disruption in the local area that may affect residents’ sense of place.

8.217 The cumulative construction and demolition activity may result in temporary loss of, or disruption to, community-facing facilities across multiple sites, including studios, creative spaces, and public realm features.

8.218 The cumulative disruption to townscape character and temporary loss of cultural and social spaces could reduce opportunities for shared expression, contribute to a weakened sense of place, and limit participation in community life over the construction and demolition stage of the Early Phases. These effects are likely to be localised but may occur frequently.

8.219 For population health, the cumulative change in access to facilities and opportunities for community identity, culture, resilience and influence can be characterised as of small scale within the urban context, experienced frequently over a medium-term duration across the demolition and construction stages of multiple schemes. The predominant health outcome change due to the potential disruption to, or concurrent loss of, on-site and off-site meanwhile uses and community-facing uses across the Site and neighbouring cumulative schemes relates to quality-of-life for a small minority of the population at the Site and Local level. Given the availability of other facilities within the surrounding area and temporary nature of these disruptions, this adverse effect is expected to remain localised and is unlikely to appreciably affect residents or service users at the wider Borough Level. As opportunities for community identity and cultural participation are expected to be reinstated or expanded during the completed development stages of the Early Phases and other cumulative schemes, a gradual reversal of such adverse health effects would be anticipated. The magnitude of the cumulative impact would be low.

8.220 On the basis of the above considerations, the cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, mediumterm, direct Minor- Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, primarily due to the temporary disruption or loss of meanwhile uses and placemaking activities across multiple schemes.

8.221 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, given greater reliance on local, accessible cultural and social infrastructure.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.222 During the Early Phases demolition and construction period, there are 12 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to contribute to changes in social participation, interaction and support

8.223 Overlapping construction periods may result in cumulative disruption to existing local opportunities for formal and informal social interaction, particularly where accessible public spaces are reduced or temporarily removed.

8.224 The population groups and sensitivity conclusions relevant to this cumulative health assessment are consistent with those set out in the Early Phases Assessment of Effects. Vulnerable groups, particularly those experiencing social isolation or exclusion, may be disproportionately affected by temporarily reduced opportunities for social participation, interaction and support.

8.225 For population health, the cumulative change in the social environment can be characterised as small in scale, experienced frequently over a medium-term period. The predominant health effects relate to small reductions in mental wellbeing and quality-of-life for a small minority of the population at the Site and Local levels. Given the urban setting and availability of other facilities and opportunities across the Borough, the effect is expected to be localised and temporary. As completed development stages introduce new spaces and programming, a reversal of adverse health effects is expected. The cumulative magnitude of impact would low

8.226 On the basis of the above considerations, for the cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, medium-term, direct Minor- Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local Levels.

8.227 For the vulnerable population, the cumulative effects would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.228 ES Chapter 9: Transport and Accessibility reports that:

• the cumulative effects of the Early Phases and schemes with an influence on the study area has been considered within the assessment, based upon a methodology agreed with RBKC, LBHF and TfL. Cumulative schemes have been incorporated within the modelling process and have been fully accounted for in the assessment. A separate cumulative assessment was not undertaken.

8.229 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility confirms that July 2024 ES conclusions remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

8.230 The Transport assessment assesses a future baseline which includes cumulative schemes and therefore, the consideration of cumulative schemes has been embedded into the Transport Modes, Access and Connections assessment.

8.231 The cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, medium-term, direct Minor- Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects

8.232 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

Housing

8.233 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics reports that:

• In terms of effects on housing provision, the Cumulative Schemes are expected to bring forward a minimum of 2,715 homes, which together with the Early Phases would result in a total of 4,660 new homes (minimum development scenario) (including PBSA contribution). Of these new homes, 3,050 would be delivered in LBHF and 1,610 would be delivered in RBKC. Therefore, the cumulative effect on housing need is assessed to be permanent, long-term, direct, Major Beneficial (significant) at the Borough level.

• Following mitigation, where required, the cumulative effect in terms of demand for social infrastructure is expected to be permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Beneficial (not significant).

8.234 ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics reports that:

• The Mund Street School cumulative scheme is expected to deliver 107 new homes on the former school site. Avonmore Primary School in anticipated to temporarily move into the Mund Street school site whilst their new school building is construction. The redevelopment of the Mund Street school site into new homes would then start once Avonmore Primary School has moved back out. Given the scale of cumulative housing delivery identified in the July 2024 ES (2,715 homes), the addition of this scheme would not change the scale or significance of interproject effects previously identified. The inter-project effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

8.235 On this basis, the cumulative housing effect for the general population would be permanent, long-term, direct ModerateMajor Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.236 For people in vulnerable groups, the cumulative housing effects, during the completed development stage of Early Phases, would be permanent, long-term, direct Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Air Quality

8.237 ES Chapter 10: Air Quality concludes that:

• the completed development cumulative effects on air quality would be consistent with the air quality residual effects and would be: permanent, long-term, direct, adverse not significant.

• traffic flows associated with cumulative schemes have been included in the assessed traffic data explicitly or through a background growth factor. It can be concluded that the completed development cumulative effects on air quality remain permanent, long-term, direct, adverse Not Significant.

8.238 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality concludes that the Early Phases completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes in the July 2024 ES for Early Phases remain valid. The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

8.239 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

8.240 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.241 Inter-project cumulative effects were scoped out of the July 2024 ES and in the addendum climate assessment.

8.242 As there are no cumulative effects identified, the cumulative health effect in relation to climate is not considered probable

Noise and Vibration

8.243 ES Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration reports that four cumulative schemes have been identified within 300 m of the Early Phases Site boundary. Assuming that each cumulative scheme complies with the relevant plant noise condition, the cumulative effects of building services noise at all receptors would remain Negligible Adverse (not significant). All four cumulative schemes above have been considered as sensitive receptors to completed development stage noise from the Early Phases Proposed Development. The completed development stage noise effects at these cumulative schemes remain as concluded within the noise and vibration residual effects

8.244 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration reports that:

• it is expected that both the cumulative scheme and Amended Proposed Development, would be required to meet local policy for plant noise, secured through a planning condition. Accordingly, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

• the embedded and additional mitigation measures detailed in this ES Addendum Chapter requires further assessment of building services and industrial noise, secured through planning condition. Should the cumulative scheme be consented, the Mund Street scheme would be an additional receptor within these assessments, and influence the mitigation required for the relevant phase of the Amended Proposed Development. Accounting for this mitigation, the is expected that significant effects would be avoided.

• planning consent for the cumulative schemes, if granted, would likely include planning conditions including in relation to noise from plant and building services. It is expected that assessments of noise would be required and would include the Amended Proposed Development as a sensitive receptor. This would lead to suitable mitigation measures being incorporated into the cumulative scheme design. Given the above, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

8.245 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the 2025 ES Early Phase Assessment of effects

8.246 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be long-term, direct Moderate (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES Early Phase Assessment of effects

Water Quality or Availability

8.247 ES Chapter 14: Water Resources states that a review of the cumulative schemes has concluded that there would be no significant cumulative adverse effects in relation water resources.

8.248 ES Chapter 14A: Water Resources concludes that there are no changes to the list of cumulative schemes which alter the effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES and so the inter-project cumulative effects reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

8.249 As there are no cumulative adverse effects identified, an associated cumulative adverse health effect is not considered probable.

Diet and Nutrition

8.250 During the Early Phases completed development stage, there are 11 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to influence the local food environment.

8.251 The cumulative schemes are expected to increase the diversity and density of food and beverage outlets in the area. When considered cumulatively with the Amended Proposed Development in the Early Phases, they may contribute positively to the vibrancy of the local food environment by expanding availability and geographic distribution of food provision.

8.252 However, there remains uncertainty regarding the specific types of food uses to be delivered within each cumulative scheme. In the absence of secured controls on affordability, nutritional standards, or inclusion of food security initiatives (e.g. community kitchens, low-cost food hubs), there is a risk that cumulative uplift in provision predominantly supports commercial food and beverage outlets that may not align with the dietary needs of low-income or health-vulnerable populations.

8.253 As outlined in baseline conditions section, the surrounding Local Level area includes some of the most deprived LSOAs in England. These social conditions heighten the relevance of diet and nutrition to public health outcomes and increase the likelihood that an expanded but commercially-oriented food offer may reinforce spatial health inequalities.

8.254 The general and vulnerable population groups, and associated sensitivity conclusions, remain consistent with those described in the Early Phases Assessment of Effects.

8.255 For population health, the cumulative change in food access and exposure to retail food environments can be characterised as medium in scale, experienced frequently over a long-term period. The predominant health outcome change relates to the balance of healthy and unhealthy food options and associated impacts on diet-related conditions (e.g. obesity, type-2-diabetes and cardiovascular health). The cumulative magnitude of health impact will depend on final land use composition and whether the food environment enables or undermines health-promoting choices. The cumulative magnitude of impact is considered to be medium, the nature of effect is both beneficial and adverse depending on final food outlet mix.

8.256 On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the diet and nutrition effects in the Early Phases would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, owing to improved convenience and potential variety of food access.

8.257 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels, with benefits contingent on affordability and inclusion of healthy food options.

8.258 For both the general and vulnerable group populations, where the cumulative schemes result in the increased presence of fast food or takeaway outlets, the cumulative effects would be long-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to potential contribution to an obesogenic environment and reduced quality of dietary offer.

8.259 Significant cumulative adverse health effects are anticipated for the vulnerable population This takes into account the expected application of NPPF paragraph 97 to cumulative schemes, limiting the potential for the food retain environment to be obesogenic.

Health and Social Care Services

8.260 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics reports that cumulative effect in terms of demand for community facilities such as education and healthcare, following mitigation where required, would be Negligible Beneficial (not significant).

8.261 ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics reports that the addition of the Mund Street School cumulative scheme would not change the scale or significance of inter-project effects previously identified given its small contribution to housing delivery and associated effects within the study area.

8.262 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be long-term, direct Minor–Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the July 2024 Early Phases Assessment of effects

8.263 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be long-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects

Community Safety

8.264 During the Early Phases completed development stage, there are 17 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to influence perceptions and experiences of community safety

8.265 These developments, taken together, would introduce new streetscapes, activated frontages, and community-facing uses that may enhance natural surveillance, promote pedestrian activity, and improve perceptions of safety, particularly where security strategies have been incorporated into the design.

8.266 The completed cumulative schemes together have the potential to change the spatial and social context of the Local area in ways that may influence actual and perceived safety. Where cumulative schemes include well-lit public spaces, secure residential environments, and active ground-floor uses, they are expected to reduce perceived unsafety and enhance surveillance. These changes can support improved mental wellbeing, reduced fear of crime and greater social interaction, particularly for groups that experience greater vulnerability in the urban environment.

8.267 The population groups and receptor sensitivities relevant to this cumulative health assessment are consistent with those set out in the Early Phases Assessment of Effects. Vulnerable groups, such as older people, children and young people, and those experiencing social disadvantage, are more sensitive to perceived and actual risks to safety and thus more likely to derive benefits from environments that promote visibility and safety.

8.268 For population health, the cumulative changes associated with community safety improvements can be characterised as of small or medium scale within the urban context, experienced frequently and over a long-term duration across the completed development stage of multiple schemes. The predominant health outcome change due to improvements to local infrastructure, security and surveillance across the Site and neighbouring cumulative schemes relates to quality of life for a small minority of the population Improvements to local infrastructure would be expected to enhance mental wellbeing and reduce fear of crime. The magnitude of the cumulative impact is considered to be low

8.269 On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the cumulative effect would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, resulting from a combination of environmental and social design features that support secure and inclusive public spaces.

8.270 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to a higher reliance on urban design and safety infrastructure to mitigate real and perceived risks.

Open Space, Leisure and Play

8.271 During the Early Phases completed development stage, 13 cumulative schemes at the local level have been identified in Table 8A.28R expected to deliver new or enhanced open spaces, leisure facilities, or play areas. These schemes have the potential to interact with the Amended Proposed Development in terms of physical activity opportunities, amenity value, and overall access to open space.

Assessment of Cumulative Health Effects

8.272 When considered cumulatively with the Amended Proposed Development in the Early Phases, the schemes would likely increase access to public realm, open space and recreational infrastructure. The combined effect is likely to increase the availability, diversity and accessibility of open space, leisure and play infrastructure across the Site and Local study area. The cumulative schemes taken together are expected to deliver attractive spaces for recreation and community gathering. Collectively, this would support physical and mental health and wellbeing through improved access to open space and opportunities for leisure and play, particularly for families, older adults and young children.

8.273 The population groups and sensitivity conclusions relevant to this cumulative health assessment are consistent with the Early Phases Assessment of Effects, with general population sensitivity considered medium and vulnerable groups assessed as high due to known inequalities in access to leisure infrastructure.

8.274 For population health, the cumulative change in access to high-quality public realm and recreation space can be characterised as medium in scale, experienced frequently over a long-term duration. The predominant health outcome change relates to increased physical activity and improved physical and mental wellbeing across a large minority of the population, particularly at the Site and Local levels. The magnitude of cumulative impact is considered to be medium

8.275 On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the cumulative open space, leisure and play effects during the completed development stage of the Early Phases would be long-term, direct, Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.276 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct, Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels due to improved access to open space, leisure and play opportunities

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.277 During the Early Phases completed development stage, there are 13 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to contribute to changes in community identity, culture, resilience and influence

8.278 The cumulative delivery of public realm and cultural infrastructure across the Early Phases and within the local area is likely to enhance opportunities for community identity. Taken together, the schemes have the potential to introduce cultural venues and gathering spaces, celebrate local heritage, and support new placemaking initiatives. The schemes also have the potential to influence the way in which existing and future residents relate to place. Cumulatively, these schemes are likely to reshape urban character, place identity, and social infrastructure provision. This may affect residents’ sense of continuity, attachment and control over their environment, all of which are relevant to mental wellbeing.

8.279 The population groups, and sensitivity conclusions relevant to the cumulative health assessment are not new or materially different to those listed for the Amended Proposed Development assessment as described in the Early Phase Assessment of Effects. Vulnerable groups may particularly benefit from increased access to inclusive spaces that promote belonging and engagement.

8.280 For population health, the cumulative impact of opportunities for community identity, culture, resilience and influence can be characterised as of medium scale, experienced frequently over a long-term duration across multiple completed developments The predominant health outcome change due to the concurrent delivery of such infrastructure relates to improvements in mental wellbeing, perceived social support, and sense of place among a large minority of the population at the Site and Local levels. Given the urban context, this beneficial effect is likely to support strengthening community identity, culture, resilience and influence among new and existing communities. A marginal reduction in health inequalities may also result from improved accessibility and co-use of cultural and community assets. The cumulative magnitude of impact is considered to be medium.

8.281 On the basis of the above considerations, the general population cumulative effects would be long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to new public spaces and cultural venues and engagement opportunities.

8.282 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels, particularly in relation to improved opportunities for belonging and mental wellbeing.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.283 During the Early Phases completed development stage, there are 12 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R that may support social participation, interaction and support when considered with the Amended Proposed Development in the Early Phases.

8.284 While the extent and types of access vary across these schemes, their cumulative delivery of spaces conducive to interaction may support the wider social fabric. The overall cumulative context may reinforce the conditions for community trust, social support, and civic participation. The cumulative schemes taken together have the potential to maintain and grow local social infrastructure in the Local Area

8.285 The cumulative increase in accessible and diverse public and semi-public spaces across the cumulative schemes is expected to reinforce the overall social infrastructure of the Local area. The variety of cultural venues, public realm spaces and commercial uses (e.g. café, halls and leisure offers) provide opportunities for social interaction, supporting mental wellbeing and social capital development.

8.286 The population groups and sensitivity conclusions relevant to this cumulative health assessment are consistent with those of the Early Phases Assessment of Effects, with general population sensitivity assessed as medium and vulnerable groups as high.

8.287 For population health, the cumulative change in opportunities for social participation, interaction and support can be characterised as medium in scale, experienced frequently, and over a long-term duration. The predominant health outcome changes relate to improvements in quality of life and mental health, particularly benefitting those at risk of isolation. The magnitude of the cumulative impact is considered to be medium

8.288 On the basis of the above considerations, the general population cumulative effect would be long-term, direct, Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.289 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct, Moderate- Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to a stronger reliance on accessible, inclusive community and social infrastructure.

8.290 These effects are long-term, spatially distributed, and contingent on delivery of high-quality, publicly accessible, and socially inclusive spaces and programmes. However, for vulnerable groups to realise these benefits equitably, barriers to access, such as affordability, must be actively addressed across the schemes.

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.291 ES Chapter 9: Transport and Accessibility reports that the cumulative effects of the Early Phases and cumulative schemes with an influence on the study area has been considered within the assessment, based upon a methodology agreed with RBKC, LBHF and TfL. Cumulative schemes have been incorporated within the modelling process and have been fully accounted for in the assessment. A separate cumulative assessment was not undertaken.

8.292 ES Chapter 9A reports that the amended cumulative schemes do not alter the conclusions of the July 2024 ES.

8.293 The Transport assessment assesses a future baseline which includes cumulative schemes and therefore, the consideration of cumulative schemes has been embedded into the Transport Modes, Access and Connections assessment. The cumulative assessment is therefore built into the modelling that underpins the input analysis for the human health assessment. Therefore, the significance conclusion for this determinant remains the same for the main assessment.

8.294 The cumulative effect for the general population would be permanent, long term, direct Moderate - Major Beneficial (significant) for the reasons set out in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects

8.295 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be permanent, long term, direct Major Beneficial (significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES Early Phases Assessment of effects.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

Air Quality

8.296 ES Chapter 10: Air Quality (July 2024) concludes the cumulative effects of the All Phases demolition and construction stage remain as described for the Early Phases demolition and construction stage cumulative effects.

8.297 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality concludes the All Phases demolition and construction cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes presented in the July 2024 ES for All Phases remain valid. The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

8.298 The cumulative effects of the All Phases demolition and construction stage remain as described for the Early Phases demolition and construction stage cumulative effects.

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.299 Inter-project cumulative effects were scoped out of the July 2024 ES and in the addendum climate assessment.

8.300 As there are no cumulative effects identified, a cumulative health effect in relation to climate is not considered probable

Noise and Vibration

8.301 ES Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration concludes that:

• No further cumulative schemes are identified within 300 m of the All Phases Site boundary. Therefore, no further consideration of cumulative demolition and construction effects is required beyond that carried out for the Early Phases.

• The cumulative demolition and construction effects remain the same as the demolition and construction effects of the All Phases as reported in ES Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration (July 2024).

8.302 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration concludes that:

• the residual cumulative effects of daytime demolition and construction noise from the All Phases are expected to be both temporary, short-term, direct, Major Adverse (significant) and temporary, medium-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant).

• the residual cumulative effects of night-time demolition and construction noise from the All Phases are expected to be temporary, short-term, direct, Major Adverse (significant).

• the residual effects of demolition and construction activity vibration from the All Phases is expected to be temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant).

• the development programme of the Mund Street cumulative scheme is not known. However it has been assumed, in accordance with standard practice, that this scheme would prepare and implement a CEMP to avoid and minimise significant adverse effects to early occupied units of the Early Phases. Accordingly, no additional combined significant effects are expected to arise.

8.303 On this basis the cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the 2025 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

8.304 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Moderate-Major Adverse (significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

Land Quality

8.305 Inter-project cumulative effects were scoped out of the July 2024 ES and the addendum ground conditions assessment. The majority of the Site has been subject to historical investigation as part of the Consented Scheme, including the demolition of the previous Earls Court Exhibition Centres. It is therefore well understood from a contamination perspective.

8.306 As there are no cumulative effects identified, the cumulative health effect in relation to land quality is not considered probable

Water Quality or Availability

8.307 ES Chapter 14: Water Resources (July 2024) states that a review of the cumulative schemes has concluded that there would be no significant cumulative adverse effects in relation water resources.

8.308 ES Chapter 14A: Water Resources concludes that there are no changes to the list of cumulative schemes which alter the effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES. Consequently, the inter-project cumulative effects reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development..

8.309 As there are no cumulative effects identified, the cumulative health effect is not considered probable.

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.310 During the All Phases demolition and construction period, there are 13 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to contribute to changes in community identity, culture, resilience and influence

8.311 While each of these schemes would progress independently, their construction timelines have the potential to generate cumulative disruption in the local area that may affect residents’ sense of place.

8.312 The cumulative construction and demolition activity may result in temporary loss of, or disruption to, community-facing facilities across multiple sites, including studios, creative spaces, and public realm features.

8.313 The assessment of potential effects on the general population and vulnerable groups during the demolition and construction stages of All Phases remains as described for the Early Phases. Therefore, the receptor sensitivity remains medium for the general population and high for vulnerable groups.

8.314 The cumulative disruption to townscape character and temporary loss of cultural and social spaces could reduce opportunities for shared expression, contribute to a weakened sense of place, and limit participation in community life over the construction and demolition stage of the All Phases. These effects are likely to be localised but may occur frequently

8.315 For population health, the cumulative change in access to facilities and opportunities for community identity, culture, resilience and influence can be characterised as of small scale within the urban context, experienced frequently over a

medium-term duration across the demolition and construction stages of multiple schemes. The predominant health outcome change due to the potential disruption, or concurrent loss of community-facing uses across the Site and neighbouring cumulative schemes relates to quality of life for a small minority of the population at the Site and Local level. Given the availability of other facilities within the surrounding area and temporary nature of these disruptions, this adverse effect is expected to remain localised and is unlikely to affect residents or service users at the wide Borough level. As opportunities for community identity and cultural participation are expected to be reinstated or expanded during the completed development stage of the All Phases and other cumulative schemes, a gradual reversal of such adverse health effects would be anticipated. The cumulative impact would be adverse and of low magnitude.

8.316 On the basis of the above considerations, the cumulative effect for the general population would be medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, primarily due to the temporary disruption or loss of community-facing infrastructure and placemaking activities across multiple schemes.

8.317 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, given greater reliance on local, accessible cultural and social infrastructure.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.318 During the All Phases demolition and construction period, there are 12 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to contribute to changes in social participation, interaction and support

8.319 Overlapping construction periods may cumulatively affect the psychosocial environment in the Local area by limiting access to meeting places, programmed events and social uses.

8.320 Overlapping construction periods may result in cumulative disruption to existing local opportunities for formal and informal social interaction, particularly where accessible public spaces are reduced or temporarily removed.

8.321 The population groups and sensitivity conclusions relevant to the cumulative health assessment are consistent with those set out in the All Phases Assessment of Effects. Vulnerable groups, particularly those experiencing social isolation or exclusion, may be disproportionately affected by temporarily reduced opportunities for social participation, interaction and support.

8.322 For population health, the cumulative change in the social environment can be characterised as small in scale, experienced frequently over a medium-term period. The predominant health effects relate to small reductions in mental wellbeing and quality-of-life for a small minority of the population at the Site and Local levels. Given the urban setting and availability of other facilities and opportunities across the Borough, the effect is expected to be localised and temporary. As completed development stages introduce new spaces and programming, a reversal of adverse health effects is expected. The cumulative magnitude of impact would low.

8.323 On the basis of the above considerations, the cumulative effect for the general population, would be temporary, mediumterm, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

8.324 For the vulnerable population, the cumulative effects would be temporary, medium-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to disproportionate reliance on local spaces

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.325 ES Chapter 9: Transport and Accessibility reports that: the All Phases demolition and construction effects conclusion are the same as the Early Phases stage.

8.326 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility states that the All Phases demolition and construction effects conclusion are the same as the Early Phases stage.

8.327 The Transport assessment assesses a future baseline which includes cumulative schemes and therefore, the consideration of cumulative schemes has been embedded into the Transport Modes, Access and Connections assessment.

8.328 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be temporary, medium term, direct MinorModerate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

8.329 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be temporary, medium term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

Housing

8.330 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics reports that:

• In terms of effects on housing provision, the Cumulative Schemes are expected to bring forward a minimum of 2,715 homes, which together with All Phases would result in a total of 5,640 new homes (minimum development scenario) (including PBSA contribution). Of these new homes, 4,030 would be delivered in LBHF and 1,610 would be delivered in RBKC. Therefore, the cumulative effect on housing need is assessed to be permanent, long-term, direct, Major Beneficial (significant) at the Borough level.

• Following mitigation, where required, the cumulative effect in terms of demand for social infrastructure is therefore expected to be permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Beneficial (not significant).

8.331 ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics reports that:

• The Mund Street School cumulative scheme is expected to deliver 107 new homes on the former school site. Avonmore Primary School in anticipated to temporarily move into the Mund Street school site whilst their new school building is construction. The redevelopment of the Mund Street school site into new homes would then start once Avonmore Primary School has moved back out. Given the scale of cumulative housing delivery identified in the July 2024 ES (2,715 homes), the addition of this scheme will not change the scale or significance of inter-project effects previously identified. The inter-project effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

8.332 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be permanent, long term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) for the reasons set out in the 2025 ES All Phases Assessment of effects

8.333 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be temporary, medium term, direct Major Beneficial (significant) for the reasons set out in the in the 2025 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

Air Quality

8.334 ES Chapter 10: Air Quality concludes the cumulative effects of the All Phases completed development stage remain as described for the Early Phases completed development stage cumulative effects.

8.335 ES Chapter 10A: Air Quality concludes the All Phases completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes presented in the July 2024 ES for All Phases remain valid. The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

8.336 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

8.337 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be permanent, long-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

Climate Mitigation and Adaptation

8.338 Inter-project cumulative effects were scoped out of the July 2024 ES and in the addendum climate assessment.

8.339 As there are no cumulative effects identified, the cumulative health effect in relation to climate is not considered probable

Noise and Vibration

8.340 ES Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration states:

• In addition to the schemes considered for the Early Phases, no further cumulative schemes were identified within 300 m of the All Phases Site boundary. Therefore, no further consideration of cumulative completed development effects is required beyond that carried out for the Early Phases.

• The cumulative completed development effects remain the same as the completed development effects of the All Phases as reported in this chapter.

8.341 ES Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration states:

• The effects of building services and industrial noise from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases scenario is expected to be the same as the Early Phases scenario once the mitigation measures detailed in ES Chapter 11A:

Noise and Vibration are accounted for. The residual cumulative effects are therefore expected to be permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant).

• As operational management is an embedded mitigation measure, the effect of commercial activity noise at Mund Street cumulative scheme is expected to be permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant).

• With the mitigation previously stated within the July 2024 ES, the effects of daytime RRV facility noise at the proposed RRV facility in Outline Component WK06 are expected to be permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant).

8.342 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be long-term, direct Minor- Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the 2025 ES All Phases Assessment of effects

8.343 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be long-term, direct Moderate (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects

Water Quality or Availability

8.344 ES Chapter 14: Water Resources states that there would be no significant cumulative adverse effects in relation water resources; however, there would be significant cumulative beneficial effects in respect of off-site flood risk and drainage infrastructure due to the implementation of sustainable surface water drainage strategies and the resulting reduction in surface water run-off from the cumulative scheme sites in the completed development stage.

8.345 ES Chapter 14A: Water Resources reports that there are no changes to the list of cumulative schemes which alter the effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES and so the inter-project cumulative effects reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

8.346 As there are no adverse cumulative effects identified, an associated cumulative adverse health effect is not considered probable.

8.347 With regards the beneficial effect on off-site flood risk and drainage infrastructure, this is noted as also having a beneficial indirect influence for public health. Within the urban context the cumulative magnitude of change is considered low in terms of the flood-risk health outcomes, including the many other contributing built environment influences and multistorey nature of urban housing. At a population level there is likely to be a minor change in flood injury and mental health morbidity risks for a small minority of the population, linked to occasional sever flood events. For the general population, of medium sensitivity, the effect would be long-term, indirect, Minor Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels. For the vulnerable group (high sensitivity), including those in basement (lower ground floor) flats, the effect would be long-term, indirect, Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

Diet and Nutrition

8.348 During the All Phases completed development stage, there are 11 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to influence the local food environment.

8.349 The assessment of cumulative diet and nutrition effects for the All Phases would remain as presented in the Early Phases cumulative assessment.

8.350 On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the diet and nutrition effects in the All Phases would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, owing to improved convenience and potential variety of food access.

8.351 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels, with benefits contingent on affordability and inclusion of healthy food options.

8.352 For both the general and vulnerable group populations, where the cumulative schemes result in the increased presence of fast food or takeaway outlets, the cumulative effects would be long-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to potential contribution to an obesogenic environment and reduced quality of dietary offer.

8.353 A significant cumulative adverse health effect is anticipated in respect of the vulnerable population. This takes into account the expected application of NPPF paragraph 97 to cumulative schemes, limiting the potential for the food retain environment to be obesogenic.

Health and Social Care Services

8.354 ES Chapter 7: Socio-Economics reports that cumulative effect in terms of demand for community facilities such as education and healthcare, following mitigation where required, would be Negligible Beneficial (not significant).

8.355 ES Chapter 7A: Socio-Economics concludes that the addition of the Mund Street School cumulative scheme would not change the scale or significance of inter-project effects previously identified given its small/low contribution to housing delivery and associated effects within the study area.

8.356 On this basis, the cumulative effect for the general population would be long-term, direct Minor–Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the July 2024 All Phases Assessment of effects.

8.357 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be long-term, direct Moderate Adverse (not significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

Community Safety

8.358 During the All Phases completed development stage, there are 17 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to influence perceptions and experiences of community safety.

8.359 These developments, taken together, would introduce new streetscapes, activated frontages, and community-facing uses that may enhance natural surveillance, promote pedestrian activity, and improve perceptions of safety, particularly where security strategies have been incorporated into the design.

8.360 The assessment of cumulative community safety effects for the All Phases completed development stage would remain as presented in the Early Phases cumulative assessment.

8.361 On the basis of the above considerations, for the general population, the cumulative effect would be long-term, direct Minor-Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, resulting from a combination of environmental and social design features that support secure and inclusive public spaces.

8.362 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to a higher reliance on urban design and safety infrastructure to mitigate real and perceived risks.

Open Space, Leisure and Play

8.363 During the All Phases completed development stage, 13 cumulative schemes at the local level have been identified in Table 8A.28R expected to deliver new or enhanced open spaces, leisure facilities, or play areas. These schemes have the potential to interact with the Amended Proposed Development in terms of physical activity opportunities, amenity value, and overall access to open space.

8.364 The assessment of cumulative open space, leisure and play effects for the All Phases completed development stage would remain as presented in the Early Phases cumulative assessment.

8.365 On the basis of the above considerations, the general population cumulative effect would be long-term, direct, Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels.

8.366 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct, Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels due to improved access to open space, leisure and play opportunities.

Community Identity, Culture, Resilience and Influence

8.367 During the All Phases completed development stage, there are 13 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R with the potential to contribute to changes in community identity, culture, resilience and influence

8.368 The assessment of cumulative community identity, culture, resilience and influence effects for the All Phases completed development stage would remain as presented in the Early Phases cumulative assessment.

8.369 On the basis of the above considerations, the general population cumulative effects would be long-term, direct Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to new public spaces and cultural venues and engagement opportunities.

8.370 For the vulnerable population, the effects would be long-term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels, particularly in relation to improved opportunities for belonging and mental wellbeing.

Social Participation, Interaction and Support

8.371 During the All Phases completed development stage, there are 12 cumulative schemes at the local level that have been identified in Table 8A.28R that may support social participation, interaction and support when considered with the Amended Proposed Development in the All Phases.

8.372 While the extent and types of access vary across these schemes, their cumulative delivery of spaces conducive to interaction may support the wider social fabric. The overall cumulative context may reinforce the conditions for community trust, social support, and civic participation. The cumulative schemes taken together have the potential to maintain and grow local social infrastructure throughout All Phases.

8.373 The assessment of cumulative social participation, interaction and support effects for the All Phases completed development stage would remain as presented in the Early Phases cumulative assessment.

8.374 On the basis of the above considerations, the general population cumulative effect would be long-term, direct, Moderate Beneficial (not significant) at the Site and Local levels

8.375 The vulnerable population cumulative effect would be long-term, direct, Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) at the Site and Local levels, due to a stronger reliance on accessible, inclusive community and social infrastructure

Transport Modes, Access and Connections

8.376 ES Chapter 9: Transport and Accessibility reports: that the cumulative effects of the Early Phases and schemes with an influence on the study area has been considered within the assessment, based upon a methodology agreed with RBKC, LBHF and TfL. Cumulative schemes have been incorporated within the modelling process and have been fully accounted for in the assessment.

8.377 ES Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility reports that the cumulative effects of the All Phases and schemes with an influence on the study area has been considered within the assessment, based upon a methodology agreed with RBKC, LBHF and TfL. Cumulative schemes have been incorporated within the modelling process and have been fully accounted for in the assessment.

8.378 The Transport assessment assesses a future baseline which includes cumulative schemes and therefore, the consideration of cumulative schemes has been embedded into the Transport Modes, Access and Connections assessment. The cumulative assessment is therefore built into the modelling that underpins the input analysis for the human health assessment. Therefore, the significance conclusion for this determinant remains the same for the main assessment.

8.379 The cumulative effect for the general population would be permanent, long term, direct Moderate-Major Beneficial (significant) for the reasons set out in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects

8.380 The cumulative effect for the vulnerable group would be permanent, long term, direct Major Beneficial (significant) for the reasons set out in the in the July 2024 ES All Phases Assessment of effects.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

8.381 Following the submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The review comments have required clarification updates to the assessment, as well as:

• assessment of the beneficial housing effects on population health;

• assessment of transport, air quality and noise effects on the general population,

• additional consideration in relation to community identity and social participation; and

• additional cumulative assessment supporting analysis.

8.382 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the public health implications of the proposed amendments as reported in relevant other ES Addendum chapters.

8.383 In respect of baseline conditions, additional baseline indicator data has been added in relation to the housing determinant of health, focusing on affordability and tenure. The data shows the housing pressures in LBHF and RBKC, and particularly in its most deprived LSOAs.

8.384 The assessment has reached the following conclusions for both the Early and All Phases development scenarios of the Amended Proposed Development:

• The demolition and construction stage effects reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid;

• Additional non-significant adverse air quality, climate change mitigation and adaptation and noise and vibration health demolition and construction stage effects in relation to the general population;

• Additional non-significant adverse community identity and social participation demolition and construction stage effects in relation to the general and vulnerable populations;

• The completed development stage effects reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid;

• Additional significant beneficial housing completed development stage effects in relation to the vulnerable group population and non-significant housing completed development stage effects for the general population;

• Additional non-significant beneficial climate change and adaptation completed development stage effects in relation to the general population; and

• Additional non-significant adverse air quality, and noise and vibration completed development stage effects on the general population

8.385 The cumulative assessment presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. Additional clarifying cumulative analysis has been undertaken (including consideration of the Mund Street School site) and the following conclusions reached:

• Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects:

For noise and vibration, a significant adverse cumulative effect is identified for the vulnerable population.

• Completed Development Cumulative Effects

For the housing health determinant, a significant beneficial cumulative effect is identified for the general and vulnerable populations.

For diet and nutrition, a significant beneficial cumulative effect is identified for the vulnerable population.

For the determinants of health relating to open space, community identity and social participation, a significant beneficial cumulative health effect is identified for vulnerable populations.

For the transport determinant, a significant beneficial cumulative health effect is identified for the general population.

8.386 The Mund Street School site scheme was considered and would not alter the reported July 2024 cumulative effects, as amended by additional clarifying cumulative analysis.

8.387 Additional non-significant and significant health effects have therefore been identified for the Amended Proposed Development

9A TRANSPORT AND ACCESSIBILITY

Introduction

9.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely transport effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the transport assessment presented of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; land use floorspace area schedules; access strategies; cycle and car parking provision of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components; and associated updated trip generation

9.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 9: Transport and Accessibility and the accompanying Volume 3, Technical Appendix 9.1 of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g Table 1A.1N)

9.3 The chapter is supported by the following amended technical appendix in Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Technical Appendix 9A.1A: Transport Link Data and Outputs Addendum.

9.4 Further detailed information regarding transport and accessibility is provided in the 2025 TA Addendum (‘TAA’) which accompanies the Addendum Hybrid Planning Applications. In response to TfL stakeholder comments on the July 2024 TA and post-submission discussions, the TAA includes further analysis on pedestrian, cyclists, public transport and highways reflecting the Amended Proposed Development assumptions (in particular those applied to consolidation of delivery and servicing trips). Updated modelling has informed the assessment within this chapter and where relevant, the assessment has referenced information from the TAA.

9.5 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Methodology

9.6 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251 Section 9 of the NPPF, paragraphs 109 to 118 deal specifically with transport planning and promoting sustainable transport. The majority of the updated NPPF with regard to Transport remains materially unchanged from previous versions with the exception of Chapter 9 paragraph 115 criterion d)2 notably includes a new reference to mitigation of significant impacts from a development through a vision-led approach.

9.7 The TA (and by extension the July 2024 ES) is considered to comply with this policy as it sets out a clear Transport Strategy to prioritise active and public transport modes whilst limiting access to private vehicles, aligned with London Plan policy. In response to the flexible nature of the Hybrid Planning Applications a ‘monitor and manage’ approach is proposed to be adopted for the build-out so that the final transport impacts and effects of the Amended Proposed Development can be monitored and the package of transport mitigation tailored to ensure it addresses the transport impacts and effects that arise.

9.8 The Amended Proposed Development therefore already considers a vision-led approach through its masterplan design, options and encouragement for sustainable travel and through its Travel Plans. As such, the updates to the NPPF have been addressed and there are no other changes of relevance to the transport and accessibility assessment.

9.9 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

1 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

2 In the previous December 2023 version of the NPPF this was Paragraph 114 criterion d)

3 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan. RBKC.

9.10 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)3 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC new local plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking assessment. The adopted RBKC New Local Plan does not introduce any new considerations for the transport and accessibility assessment

9.11 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

9.12 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

9.13 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of post-submission review comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2A.10N of ES Volume 3A

9.14 Stakeholder comments were provided on the July 2024 TA by TfL and have been responded to separately (see Appendix A of the TAA)

9.15 Extensive engagement has taken place with Transport Stakeholders (RBKC, LBHF, and TfL)4 as part of the postsubmission process This has included regular (approximately monthly) meetings on transport matters. The following post application meetings have been held:

• Overview of planning submission transport documentation - 9 October 2024;

• Review of Greater London Authority (GLA) Stage 1 response in respect of transport comments - 20 November 2024;

• Station Mitigation Workshop - 17 December 2024;

• Review of comments received from TfL, LBHF and RBKC and Warwick Road two-way cycle track - 18 December 2024;

• Trip Generation - 15 January 2025;

• LBHF Highways Workshop - 15 January 2025;

• LBHF Highways Workshop - 29 January 2025;

• Maximum Development Parameters comparison to updated Trip Generation, Warwick Road two-way cycle track, 2041 Early Phases and TAA Scope - 26 February 2025;

• S106 Heads of Terms and TAA Scope - 19 March 2025;

• LBHF Highways Workshop - 19 March 2025;

• LBHF Highways Workshop - 22 April 2025;

• Warwick Road alternative cycle access strategy, Transport Stakeholder feedback responses - 23 April 2025;

• Updated development proposals and TAA Scope - 21 May 2025; and

• Highway micro-simulation modelling scope workshop - 5 June 2025;

9.16 In respect of the July 2024 Hybrid Planning Applications and TA, alongside feedback from the post-application meetings and sessions as listed above, formal feedback from Transport Stakeholders was provided on the following dates:

• Greater London Authority (GLA) Stage 1 response (including TfL comments) - 11 November 2024;

• TfL:

Masterplan Comments - 28 November 2024;

4 Officers and members from London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, and TfL.

Earls Court Trip Generation Review - 4 December 2024; Detailed component comments - 24 January 2025; Servicing and Delivery Comments - 6 March 2025; Trip Generation comments - 13 March 2025;

LBHF Detailed Component Cycle Parking Review - 13 June 2025;

• RBKC:

RBKC Officer - EC Brompton Road Crossing - 26 November 2024;

RBKC Officer - Feedback on February 2024 Transport Assessment Scoping Note - 2 December 2024;

RBKC Consolidated Feedback including Transport Officer (Appendix 18) - 3 February 2025;

RBKC Officer - Revised Warwick Road Access Strategy - 4 April 2025;

RBKC Officer Feedback - 9 May 2025;

RBKC Officer Feedback - 4 June 2025;

• LBHF:

Planning Observations - Highways & Transportation Comments - 12 December 2024;

LBHF Officer - Detailed Component Highways and Transportation Comments - 18 February 2025;

Updated Trip Generation comments - 2 May 2025; and Comments - 9 May 2025

9.17 Separate responses have been provided to each stakeholder and are presented within Appendix A of the TAA.

9.18 The scope of the TAA has been discussed with the Transport Stakeholders at the post-submission meeting held on 21 May 2025 and seeks to respond to the comments received by providing additional supporting information to the TA whilst updating calculations and assessments (where appropriate) to account for changes to the Amended Proposed Development. In summary the key elements of the July 2024 TA that have been updated and are presented within the TAA are as follows:

• Updated Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL)5 to account for the release of TfL’s new WebCAT 3.0 database;

• Updated trip generation to address comments received from the Transport Stakeholders (in particular those related to consolidation of delivery and servicing trips);

• Updated comparison of the first principles trip generation to the maximum development parameters used in the strategic modelling;

• Refined bus analysis to present the uplift in demand as a result of the Proposed Development by bus stop and then by route accessing each bus stop;

• Updated highway network assessment including junction capacity assessments and micro-simulation modelling;

• Inclusion of a sensitivity test of the Early Phases development within the 2041 future year;

• Refined and updated package of mitigation;

• Updated access strategy and trip generation relating to the demolition and construction stage; and

• Further information relating to the Monitor and Manage Approach proposed to be adopted.

9.19 RBKC, LBHF and Waterman post-submission review comments of the July 2024 ES resulted in some clarification responses and some typographical errors and inconsistent use of terminology. These do not alter the conclusions of the July 2024 ES, but have been addressed throughout the assessment within this addendum.

Assessment Scope

9.20 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of aspects set out in the following paragraphs.

9.21 In respect of technical scope:

• the assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description;

• updated completed development trip generation calculations for delivery and servicing movements and updated assumptions have necessitated a re-run of the supporting strategic models.

9.22 In respect of spatial scope, the updated strategic modelling identified 634 potential affected links (284 more than the 250 links assessed in 2024), which were subject to Rule 1 and Rule 2 screening. In total 137 links were identified for assessment within this addendum. Of the 137 links, the following 67 (numbered 1 to 73 but not continuous) links were considered in the July 2024 transport ES chapter:

• 32 Links considered as part of the Early Phases and All Phases demolition and construction assessment;

• 26 Links considered as part of the Early Phases completed development assessment; and

• 42 Links considered as part of the All Phases completed development assessment.

9.23 A qualitative assessment of the flow changes to the 67 links have concluded to be negligible and concluded not to change any of the conclusions of the July 2024 ES. A summary of the flow changes and conclusions are presented in Table 9A.1N.

9.24 At two links, Link 1 - Empress Place and Link 48 - Beaumont Avenue, larger increases in traffic flows are predicted (compared to the July 2024 ES) in the assessment scenarios. These numbers have been checked and assessed utilising the July 2024 ES assessment methodology and criteria. The scale of effect conclusions remain as reported in the July 2024 ES.

9.25 As such, the revised and updated flows of the 67 links (numbered 1 to 73 but not continuous) demonstrate that the Amended Proposed Development would not result in any material changes to any of the conclusions of the July 2024 ES. Therefore, the assessment of the 67 links (numbered 1 to 73, not continuous) as presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

9.26 The assessment scope of this addendum ES chapter therefore focuses on the 70 additional links (links numbered 74144 continuous) which are either the most sensitive or likely to experience the greatest effects as a result of the Amended Proposed Development across the various modelled scenarios. The 70 additional links were not previously identified for assessment in the 2024 modelling and assessment.

https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-andconstruction/planning-applications/planning-with-webcat - last accessed 17 July 2025.

Table 9A.2N: Re-assessment of Links Assessed in July 2024 ES Summary

1 Empress Approach

7 Grosvenor Rd adj Pimlico Gdns and St George's Sq Gdns

8

Table 9A.2N: Re-assessment of Links Assessed in July 2024 ES Summary

1A:

Table 9A.2N: Re-assessment of Links Assessed in July 2024 ES Summary

Link Name 2031 Demolition and Construction - July 2024 ES 2031 Demolition and Construction - 2025 ES Addendum

65 North End Rd b/w Mund St and Charleville Rd 10562 1261 10553 1253 No material change in flows

66 North End Rd b/w Castletown Rd and Charleville Rd 12753 1289 12732 1276 No material change in flows

67 North End Rd b/w Beaumont Ave and Baron's Court Rd 15464 1429 15405 1416 No material change in flows

68 North End Rd b/w A4 W Cromwell Rd and Baron's Court Rd 15439 1425 15377 1412 No material change in flows

69 North End Rd b/w Beaumont Ave and Beaumont Cresc 12726 1284 12695 1270 No material change in flows

70 Mund St / Aisgill Ave 1637 65 1593 21 No material change in flows

71 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Eardley Cr and A3220 11310 1044 11512 1254 No material change in flows

72 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Site Access and Eardley Cres 11461 1212 11740 1422 No material change in flows

73 Fenelon Place 23472 1352 23590 1476 No material change in flows

*Cells highlighted in grey denote links that were not assessed in that modelling scenario.

9.27 In respect of temporal scope:

• the assessment of demolition and construction stage effects have been based on the amended information presented in Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description and updated time slices presented in Technical Appendix 5.1A, ES Volume 3A; and

• the assessment of completed development stage effects for the Early Phases has been subject to a sensitivity test in the TAA.

9.28 In respect of the sensitivity test and by way of background, for the July 2024 Hybrid Planning Applications, the July 2024 TA and ES assessed the Early Phases completed development stage in the 2031 TfL future forecast model year (future baseline).

9.29 Chapter 6 of the TAA presents the findings of a sensitivity test undertaken to consider the impacts of the completed development stage of the Early Phases at the 2041 TfL future forecast model year (instead of the 2031 TfL future forecast model year as assessed within the July 2024 ES and July 2024 TA)

9.30 A Technical Note (TN) was issued on 15 January 2025 to the Transport Stakeholders to outline the background, rationale and scope for undertaking this sensitivity assessment The TN is presented in Appendix H of the TAA.

9.31 The TA and transport data used within July 2024 ES assessed two development scenarios:

• Completion of the Early Phases (excluding LBD) - assessed in the future year of 2031 (Scenario 4); and

• Completion of the All Phases (the entire development) - assessed in the future year of 2041 (Scenario 5).

9.32 Whilst these scenarios and the assumptions within them remain valid, (and as such are also considered within the TAA,) it was agreed that consideration of a 2041 Early Phases scenario would also be undertaken to ‘sense check’ the conclusions reached in the transport evidence base presented within the Hybrid Planning Applications.

9.33 The results of the assessment contained in the sensitivity test identified the following findings:

• The pedestrian network shows a number of locations where footway constraints result in the Pedestrian Comfort Level (PCL) being either ‘At Risk’ or ‘Very / Extremely Uncomfortable’ when assessed as a Transport Interchange. A package of mitigation measures for the Early Phases (as discussed in the July 2024 ES and TA) has been developed to improve pedestrian conditions in a number of locations. However, it is acknowledged that in some locations (such as on Old Brompton Road to the east of the Proposed Development) there are existing limitations that present a constraint to the introduction of mitigation. It is expected that this element would fall under and be subject to the monitor and management strategy that is set out within Section 8 of the TAA regardless.

• From a bus analysis perspective, the results are very similar to those presented for the 2031 Early Phases and as such would not warrant analysis beyond what has been presented in Section 5 of the TAA and the July 2024 ES

• From a rail perspective, at a London and line level scale, the impacts and level of change of the 2041 future year baseline are very similar to those identified for the 2031 Early Phases scenario compared to the 2031 future year baseline. As such the 2031 Completed Development (Early Phases) assessment undertaken in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

• At a station level the results presented for Earls Court and West Brompton are similar to those presented for the 2031 Early Phases within the TA and reported in the July 2024 ES.

9.34 Overall, it is considered that the 2041 Early Phases assessment impacts and effects would be similar to those presented for the 2031 Early Phases assessment in the TA and July 2024 ES and no specific assessment has identified a need to consider bespoke additional mitigation to address impacts associated with the 2041 Early Phases assessment beyond that which has been identified previously in the TA and July 2024 ES

9.35 In respect of temporal scope, the cumulative stage scope remains as presented in the July 2024 ES. However, an additional scheme at the Mund Street School site has required qualitative consideration due to the proximity of the scheme to the Site (adjacent to the western boundary).

Baseline Characterisation Method

9.36 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.37 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

9.38 The assessment methods presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of the aspects set out in the following paragraphs and sections.

9.39 The assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Stage

Access Strategy

9.40 ES Chapter 5A: Addendum Demolition and Construction Description, and Technical Appendix 5A.1 in ES Volume 3A provides the amended access points and access routes to be used during the demolition and construction stage of the Early Phases and the All Phases. The Aisgill Avenue (via Mund Street) access points have been removed as vehicular access points, resulting in amended flows and secondary peak at Beaumont Avenue.

Traffic Data and Trip Generation

9.41 The updated demolition and construction vehicle flows have been provided by the Applicant’s construction advisor (Turner and Townsend). The updates take account of changes in construction strategy, as well as the removal of Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue as a demolition and construction access point. This forecast has been assessed against the future traffic data for each link in accordance with the IEMA Guidelines. The data was manually added onto the 2031 Early Phases demolition and construction stage Scenario 3.

9.42 For the purposes of this addendum, the peak demolition and construction flows, which are predicted to occur in September 2028 have been applied to the future year of 2031. This is the same peak period as set out in the July 2024 ES. During this period, it has been assumed that the totality of the Early Phases would be completed, occupied and operational.

9.43 As noted previously, the routing and access used within this assessment has been informed by the information within ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description and loaded into the outputs from the strategic models

6 Light Goods Vehicles (LGVs) equating to those vehicles up to 3.5 tonnes

7 Table 9.4 of the July 2024 ES identifies a total of 175 arrivals and departures

manually. Table 9.4A provides the total construction vehicular movements (peak daily trips) assessed in the Early Phases Scenario 3 This is comparable to Table 9.4 of the July 2024 ES.

Table 9A.4A: Amended Early Phases Peak Demolition and Construction Trip Generation (Total Daily) Arrivals Departures

9.44 The demolition and construction trip generation for Early Phases demolition and construction stage Scenario 3 identifies a daily total of 190 arrivals and departures at the Early Phases Site This is an increase of 15 daily vehicles compared to the assessment undertaken in the July 2024 ES7

9.45 During the Early Phases build out, not all access points would be available, and the vehicular flows have therefore been distributed across the accesses shown in the time slice (See Technical Appendix 5A.1) for September 2028

9.46 In terms of demolition and construction personnel, ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description sets out the forecast combined labour projections and outlines that the peak personnel period falls within the same months assumed for vehicular movements, i.e. September 2028

9.47 The Applicant’s construction advisers have confirmed that the peak month (September 2028) would see a potential peak workforce of up to 5,000 on-site. The Applicant’s construction adviser has confirmed that these labour figures are weekly, based on a Monday - Friday working week As such the forecast peak number of daily demolition and construction workers would be approximately 1,000 daily workers These would be split across various shift patterns and roles across the various Site accesses.

9.48 As set out in the July 2024 ES these workers would not all travel in peak hours and would be spread throughout the day as they are involved in specific demolition and construction tasks. This would include an element of white-collar workers. It has been assumed that these would be similar to typical office-based workers and would seek to travel in the AM and PM peak hours. The majority of other workers would be expected to travel outside of the network peak hours.

9.49 As set out in the assessment method section of the July 2024 ES, which remains applicable to this ES Addendum, a review of the public transport demand for the Early Phases completed development stage was used as a proxy to ascertain the potential impacts from the Early Phases demolition and construction stage. As these numbers have not changed, the impacts remain the same as presented previously. The increase in forecast workers (compared to the estimates in the July 2024 ES) remains an estimate that would vary and is not considered to result in any material change to the previous assessments.

Completed Development Stage

Access Strategy

9.50 The amended Early Phases access strategy used within the assessment (and coded into the modelling) is presented in Figure 9A 6R and Table 9A 5R

9.51 The vehicular access points have been added in to the respective Future Baseline (2031) + Proposed Development (Early Phases) (completed development stage Scenario 4) models to load operational and servicing traffic.

Figure 9A 6R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Access Strategy Layout

Table 9A 5R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Access Strategy Summary

User Group Routes / Access Provision

Pedestrians Pedestrians would be able to access the northern and southern Warwick Road access points at Warwick Square. The public realm within the Early Phases Site would then facilitate access via Warwick Lane, Warwick Crescent and the central public realm (The Table).

An east-west pedestrian connection would be provided from Warwick Road through to Aisgill Avenue connecting with a north-south connection to facilitate access to Lillie Road (Empress Place Boulevard) and along the WLL to connect with the crossing on Lillie Road adjacent to West Brompton Station.

St Cuthbert’s Lane would become a pedestrian link up to the Early Phases Site boundary with onward connection through the basement of 100 West Cromwell Road

A further connection maybe delivered to Cluny Mews from St Cuthbert’s Lane (subject to third party agreement). However, this is not assessed within this chapter as embedded mitigation.

A further connection could be delivered to the A4 from Development Zone S (Plot EC20); however, subject to further discussions with stakeholders and as such is not assessed within this chapter as embedded mitigation.

A connection would be provided to Old Brompton Road allowing plots located on West Brompton Lane and West Brompton Crescent to be accessed. This new link would also provide a connection to Warwick Road.

Cyclists In addition to the previously set out pedestrian connections, where shared pedestrian and cycle routes would be delivered, a cycle connection would also be delivered along West Brompton Lane facilitating a two-way connection between Old Brompton Road and Warwick Road.

Cyclists would be able to connect to/from the north using St Cuthbert’s Lane and the 100 West Cromwell Road basement once construction on the Early Phases Site has finished (subject to third party agreement). However, this is not assessed within this chapter as embedded mitigation

A further connection could be delivered to the A4 from Development Zone S (Plot EC20); however, subject to further discussions with stakeholders and as such is not assessed within this chapter as embedded mitigation

Completed Development Trip Generation

9.52 As set out in the July 2024 ES it was necessary to commence modelling in September 2023 to allow for sufficient verification of the outputs with the Transport Stakeholders. However, at this time, the floorspace areas of the Proposed Development had not been fixed for planning. Therefore, floorspace areas were agreed with the Applicant for the purposes of modelling The approach to traffic data and trip generation remains as presented in the July 2024 ES; however, the range of use class quantum’s have been subject to change within the Amended Proposed Development.

9.53 An updated comparison of the Early Phases floorspace areas that were used in the September 2023 modelling and the amended Early Phases floorspace areas in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description, is presented in Table 9A.6A together with commentary on the differences when compared to an amended reasonable worst-case draw down of the floorspace areas.

9.54 The comparison shows that there are slight differences (of 22,854 m2 GIA) in the total modelled floorspace (i.e. 416,082 - 393,228 m2 GIA), approximately 5.5 %, and is within the 10 %8 acceptable limit of deviation for the fixed for modelling floorspace areas.

9.55 As was the case with the July 2024 ES, the underlying approach of modelling and assessing maximum trip generating uses has not been undermined. This is because, the September 2023 floorspace modelling has modelled higher trip generating uses and therefore, represents a worst-case approach.

9.56 As such, the September 2023 modelling exercise remains a robust and valid basis for assessment of the Early Phases for the Amended Proposed Development.

Vehicles (Private)

Vehicles (Emergency)

Vehicles would access from Warwick Road, Fenelon Place, Old Brompton Road and Lillie Road.

Vehicle access from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue has been removed for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of emergency vehicle access.

Emergency service vehicles would be able to use all the vehicle access points identified above. In addition, they would be able to use the pedestrian and cycle connection on Aisgill Avenue and Empress Place Boulevard.

Whilst there is no minimum, the September 2023 modelling of the Early Phases assumed some B8 space which was identified at that time to be logistics but with the potential for flexibility within that use (i.e. any B8 use). The transport modelling considers this land use to have an employment density which is similar to the Research and Development use. As such its application can be considered commensurate to adding further Research and Development Use. Maximums have increased (compared to those in the July 2024 ES); however, the transport modelling considers a similar GIA value. Regardless, the worst-case drawdown would not include this land use.

Table 9A.6A: Amended Proposed Early Phases Area Schedule

Table 9A.6A: Amended Proposed Early Phases Area Schedule

*Comprises floorspace for incidental purposes linked to the land uses in the table. ** GIA for the Outline Component has been calculated at a 92 % factor of GEA.

Comments/Notes

The worst-case parameters adopted for the September 2023 modelling were set by considering the maximum commercial land use (Office and Research and Development) as this use would generate the highest traffic movements and therefore have focused on ensuring the highest quantum of commercial is assessed. Whilst in terms of floorspace the modelling uses a higher value, when converted to units, this results in a lower quantum of residential units being assessed. As the Office and Research and Development generates a significantly higher quantum of trips per m2 of floorspace, this approach is considered appropriate as it ensures a worst-case scenario has been considered.

The difference is created by the evolution of the student accommodation within the Detailed Component. The increase in rooms (from 550 to 696 = 146) would not materially impact the modelling results.

Retail land uses have the potential to generate a significant quantum of trips when compared to residential land uses. The use of a higher quantum of retail than the minimum is therefore considered appropriate to ensure a worst case assessment from a transport perspective.

The 2,163 m2 leisure use which would consist of a gym or equivalent has been removed and modelled instead as higher trip generating retail floorspace (0-230 = -230)

has the potential to generate significantly more trips in the AM peak hour when compared to other uses such as residential. Whilst trips are likely to be lower in the PM peak when compared to other uses the AM peak is generally the more congested peak hour and therefore this approach was taken to ensure a worst case assessment from a transport perspective.

Ancillary comprises floorspace for incidental purposes linked to the land uses in the

whilst not included see comment below about overall cap on development quantum. Ancillary spaces are not considered to be trip generators in their own rights, as they are attached to the main land use categories and provide back of house space / storage or servicing areas. Ttrip generation for the land uses already accounts for servicing vehicles and as such no additional movements are required for ancillary uses

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

9.57 The amended trips (including servicing and deliveries, and any logistics elements) included in the modelling are presented in Table 9A 7R and the respective mode share in Table 9A.8R

Table 9A.7R: Amended Early Phases – Peak Trip Generation

Table 9A 8R: Amended Early Phases – Peak Mode Share

9.58 Table 9A 7R and Table 9A.8R provide the amended AM and PM peak hour trips and resulting mode shares. A number of assessments utilise AADT12 and as such, Table 9A 9R presents the amended operational vehicular flows in AADT for the Early Phases.

Table 9A.9R: Amended Early Phases – All Vehicles Average

9.59 In terms of AADTs, the Early Phases completed development stage would generate approximately 5,815 vehicles, of which 21 % would be HDVs.

9.60 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases scenario for the following assessments:

• Severance;

• Driver Delay;

• Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay; Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity and Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation;

• Accidents and Safety;

• Parking and Servicing Demand; and

• Public Transport Demand and Capacity.

Public Transport Demand and Capacity

9.61 The assessment methods for public transport demand and capacity presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases scenario.

9.62 As demonstrated by the data presented in Table 9A.7R, no changes to public transport trips have been identified as a result of the updated trip generation compared to that assessed in the July 2024 ES. Accordingly, no updated assessment has been presented in this chapter and the previous analysis remains valid.

Cumulative Stage

9.63 The assessment method remains as presented in the July 2024 ES, with the exception of the Mund Street School site, which has been considered qualitatively.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Stage

9.64 The All Phases demolition and construction stage assessment method presented within the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Access Strategy

9.65 All vehicular access points from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue have been removed for the All Phases development scenario, with the exception of emergency vehicle access. The removal of the vehicular access would be secured by an appropriately worded planning condition.

Demolition and Construction Trip Generation

9.66 As outlined in the July 2024 ES, the same peak demolition and construction trips provided for the Early Phases are applicable to the All Phases demolition and construction scenario. Therefore, the amended flows as presented in Table 9A.4A have been adopted as a worst-case

Completed Development Stage

Access Strategy

9.67 The amended access strategy used within the transport analysis (and coded into the modelling) is presented in Figure 9A 9R and Table 9A 10R

9.68 The vehicular access points have been added in the Future Baseline (2041) + Proposed Development (All Phases) (completed development stage Scenario 5) models to load, operational and servicing traffic.

Figure 9A.9R: Amended All Phases Access Strategy Layout

Table 9A.10R: Amended All Phases Access Strategy Summary

User Group Routes / Access Provision

Pedestrians In addition to the Early Phases, the All Phases Site would allow pedestrian access from North End Road, Beaumont Avenue as well as additional access on Aisgill Avenue/Mund Street and potential access points at Gibbs Green Close and Mund Street School site

To the north, potential pedestrian connections onto the A4 through the All Phases Site would be provided. This access would be phased with access initially provided via the existing bridge link in the west of Development Zone X. In the longer term it is anticipated that this link would be provided in the centre of Development Zone X.

Internal routes from the northern plots to central, south and The Table would also become available, ensuring that the site becomes fully accessible.

Cyclists In addition to the Early Phases, cyclists would be able to utilise Beaumont Avenue, Aisgill Avenue and Mund Street accesses, a potential access point from Mund Street School site and potential access points onto the A4 / West Cromwell Road to the north through Development Zone X.

Vehicles (Private)

Vehicles (Emergency)

Vehicular access to the land occupied by the LBD would be via Beaumont Avenue. Access to the other plots remains as per the Early Phases

Vehicle access from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue has been removed for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of emergency vehicle access

Emergency service vehicles would be able to use all the vehicle access points identified above. In addition, they would also be able to use the pedestrian connection on Aisgill Avenue

Table 9A.11A: Amended Proposed All Phases Area Schedule

Completed Development Trip Generation

9.69 As set out in the Early Phases methodology, a worst-case in terms of land use trip generation has also been adopted for the All Phases modelling.

9.70 An updated comparison of the All Phases floorspace areas that were used in the September 2023 modelling and the amended All Phases floorspace areas in ES Chapter 4A: Proposed Development Description, is presented in Table 9A.11A together with commentary on the differences when compared to a reasonable worst-case draw down of the floorspace areas.

9.71 The comparison shows that there is a slight difference of 30,339 m2 GIA in the total modelled floorspace (i.e. 653,442623,103), approximately 4.8 % so within +/- 10 %13 of the fixed for modelling floorspace areas.

9.72 The underlying approach of modelling and assessing maximum trip generating uses has not been undermined. This is because, the September 2023 floorspace modelling has modelled higher trip generating uses and therefore represents a worst-case approach.

9.73 As such, the September 2023 modelling exercise results in a robust and valid basis for assessment of the All Phases for the Amended Proposed Development.

Comments/Notes

Whilst there is no minimum, the September 2023 modelling of the Early Phases assumed some B8 space which was identified at that time to be logistics but with the potential for flexibility within that use (i.e. any B8 use). The transport modelling considers this land use to have an employment density which is similar to the Research and Development use. As such its application can be considered commensurate to adding further Research and Development Use.

The worst-case parameters adopted for the September 2023 modelling were set by considering the maximum commercial land use (Office and Research and Development) as this use would generate the highest traffic movements and therefore have focused on ensuring the highest quantum of commercial is assessed. Whilst n terms of floorspace the modelling uses a higher value, when converted to units, this results in a lower quantum of residential being assessed. As the Office and Research and Development generates a significantly higher quantum of trips per m2 of floorspace, this approach is considered appropriate as it ensures a worst-case scenario has been considered.

Table 9A.11A: Amended Proposed All Phases Area Schedule

*Comprises floorspace for incidental purposes linked to the land uses in the table. ** GIA for the Outline Component has been calculated at a 92 % factor of GEA.

9.74 The final trips (including servicing and deliveries, and any logistics elements) included in the modelling are presented in Table 9A 12R and the respective mode share in Table 9A 13R

Table 9A 12R: All Phases – Trip Generation

Comments/Notes

The difference between the higher floorspace modelled and assessed and the minimum (19,915 -11,630 = 8,285) is not considered material and accounts for other uses such as the

of leisure use.

The 2,163 m2 leisure use which would consist of a gym or equivalent has been removed and modelled instead as higher trip generating retail floorspace (0 - 230 = -230).

A

Whilst there is no minimum, the September 2023 modelling assessed an element of education uses (as a consistent floor area as per the Early Phases) as a worst case.

A floor area lower than the proposed maximum has been assessed, off-set by the higher levels of Office / R&D

The

between the

modelled area and the

area (3,634 - 1,380 = 2,254) is considered de minimus

Ancillary comprises floorspace for incidental purposes linked to the land uses in the table, whilst not included see comment below about overall cap on development quantum. Ancillary spaces are not considered to be trip generators in their own rights, as they are attached to the main land use categories and provide back of house space / storage or servicing areas. The trip generation for the land uses already accounts for servicing vehicles and as such no additional movements are required for ancillary uses.

The September 2023 modelling has modelled and the assessment in this chapter has generally assessed a higher quantum of higher trip generating floorspace uses.

Table 9A.13R: All Phases – Mode Share

9.75 Table 9A 12R presents the amended All Phases AM and PM peak hour trips. Table 9A 14R presents the amended operational vehicular flows in AADT for the All Phases.

Table 9A 14A: All Phases – All Vehicles

9.76 In terms of AADTs, the All Phases development scenario would generate approximately 9,222 vehicles, of which 20 % would be HDVs.

9.77 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development All Phases scenario for the following assessments:

• Severance;

• Driver Delay;

• Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay; Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity and Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation;

• Accidents and Safety;

• Parking and Servicing Demand; and

• Public Transport Demand and Capacity

Cumulative Stage

9.78 As agreed through the EIA scoping process, and as set out in the July 2024 ES, a separate cumulative stage assessment has not been presented within this ES chapter.

Assessment Criteria

9.79 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development the with subsequent exceptions.

Receptor Sensitivity Criteria

9.80 The receptor sensitivity criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.81 In response to comments from Waterman, the July 2024 ES applied the link sensitivity screening criteria as per Table 9.15 on the July 2024 ES. The identified links predominantly fall within either Very High sensitivity– due to high levels of pedestrian movements, bus interchange or nearby recreational use or High sensitivity– similar to very high but lower demand. Where assigned as Negligible sensitivity, this was an erroneous use of DMRB terminology. It should be Very Low due to primarily being much quieter side road type links that had no nearby sensitive receptors.

9.82 The scale of effect was derived by application of Table 9.22 of the July 2024 ES and professional judgement.

9.83 The links identified in the July 2024 ES had the appropriate sensitivity adopted and as such the scale of effect remains unchanged.

Assumptions and Limitations

9.84 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the following additional assumptions have been made during the preparation of this addendum assessment:

• A qualitative review of the Mund Street School site scheme has been undertaken and reported at the cumulative assessment section of this chapter.

• As agreed with the Transport Stakeholders, the 2031 and 2041 data assumes the following:

Updated construction routes and re-forecast movements (as provided by the Applicant’s construction advisor) which is added onto the corresponding future year;

No use of the Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue access points for either the demolition and construction stage or completed development stage;

Removal of any assumptions related to the use of consolidation delivery models for delivery and servicing trips forecast for the Amended Proposed Development during the completed development stage;

Linked with the above, a re-run of the supporting strategic models with the updated assumption (updated construction traffic and routes, updated Amended Proposed Development quantums and changes to servicing and delivery trips)

9.85 It is not considered that any of the above assumptions has prevented the accurate assessment of potential transport and accessibility impacts or the identification of appropriate mitigation measures.

Baseline Conditions

Existing Baseline

9.86 Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced at Empress Place, the baseline conditions presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid in respect of;

• pedestrian and cycle networks,

• bus and rail public transport networks,

• local highway, and

• parking and accident information.

9.87 A single exception to this is the Public Transport Accessibility Level (‘PTAL ) calculations, which have been updated and presented below.

Public Transport Network

9.88 Following the Hybrid Planning Applications submissions in July 2024, TfL updated their PTAL Tool (WebCAT)

9.89 The updated review shows the same PTAL scores and demonstrates the majority of the Site has very good levels of public transport accessibility (PTAL 6a or excellent) as a result of being located adjacent to three London Underground / Overground Stations and numerous bus routes. However, the Site does feature a PTAL of 4 and 5 on North End Road and around the West Kensington and Gibbs Green Estate, where the distance from available bus routes and London Underground / Overground stations increases. Overall, the PTAL score remains the same as previously reported, as presented in Figure 9A 13R

Figure 9A 13R: Amended Existing Site Public Transport Accessibility Level Assessment

9.90 The remaining public transport baseline conditions presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Future Baseline

9.91 The future baseline as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Effects

9.92 The assessment of effects has considered two development scenarios: Early Phases and All Phases.

Links Identified and Sensitive Receptors

9.93 The 67 links presented in Table 9.28 of the July 2024 ES remain valid sensitive receptors in respect of the Amended Proposed Development. However, in response to post-submission comments, amended servicing and deliveries trip calculations, updated strategic modelling and application of IEMA Rule 1 and Rule 2, 70 additional links have been identified for assessment within this chapter

9.94 Table 9A 28A provides a summary of the 70 additional links identified for assessment. These are discussed in further detail in subsequent assessment sub-sections. Only those links which are additional i.e., 74 to 143 are included in the assessment within this chapter

Table 9A.28A: Amended Early and All Phases Assessment Links by Scenario

74

75

76

77

Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl ✔

109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres ✔

110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G ✔

111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G ✔ ✔ ✔

112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street ✔ ✔

113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G ✔

114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road ✔

115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl ✔

116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place ✔

117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place ✔

118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street ✔ ✔

119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square ✔ ✔

120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St ✔ ✔

121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road ✔

122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church ✔

123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road ✔

Figure 9A.1N: Amended Early and All Phases Demolition and Construction Sensitive Receptor Locations

RAMBOLL

Figure 9A 2N: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Sensitive Receptor Locations

Figure 9A 3N: Amended All Phases Completed Development Sensitive Receptor Locations

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

9.96 Full details of the indicative demolition and construction programme are presented in ES Chapter 5A: Demolition and Construction Description. The embedded mitigation summary presented in the Jully 2024 ES remains valid.

Links Identified and Sensitive

Receptors

9.97 Based on the IEMA Guidelines Rule 1 and 2 screening criteria, all links with a 30 % change in all vehicles or HDVs have been taken forward for further assessment. In addition, any links identified as medium and high sensitivity have been considered.

9.98 The 32 links presented in Table 9A.29A of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases demolition and construction assessment

9.99 Table 9A.29A presents the additional 51 links screened for assessment of the Early Phases demolition and construction assessment. Further detailed information on how the links have been identified is contained in Technical Appendix 9A.1A

Table 9A.29A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

Link Link Name Link Description Sensitive Receptor Borough Sensitivity

74 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

Link in urban area running through residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Suitable for on-road cycling (on-road mandatory cycle lane).

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal crossing points with dropped kerbs

Yes Westminster High

Table 9A 29A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

Link Link Name Link Description Sensitive Receptor Borough Sensitivity and tactile paving. Suitable for on-road cycling (onroad advisory cycle lane).

83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

Link in urban area running through residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Quiet side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling due to its quiet nature.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

No Wandsworth Very Low

No Wandsworth Very Low

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Medium

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

No Hammersmith and Fulham Medium

87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands. Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

88 North End Road south of Archel Road

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands. Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road - 1

93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road - 2

94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Link in urban area running through residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Quiet side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling due to its quiet nature.

Link in urban area running through residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Quiet side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling due to its quiet nature.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

and Chelsea

Yes Kensington and Chelsea High

Yes Kensington and Chelsea High

Yes Kensington and Chelsea Medium

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands. No Kensington and Chelsea Medium

96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

and Chelsea

and

Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

Table 9A 29A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

and Chelsea Very

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

Severance

9.100 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage severance effects at the 32 links presented in Table 9.30 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.101 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage severance effects on the additional 51 links within the study area are presented in Table 9A.30A

Table 9A 30A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Severance Effects

Link ID

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87 Very High 1.3% 1.2% 2.1% Very Low Minor to Moderate

88

89

90 Very High -0.2% 1.5% 1.6% Very Low Minor to

91

92

93

94 Medium 0.2%

97

Table 9A 30A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Severance Effects

9.102 The conclusions for the 32 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.103 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.30A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 - Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd ;

Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link;

Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street;

Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns;

Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns;

Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue;

Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road; and

Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

9.104 Through application of the management measures contained within the CTLP, the magnitude of impact on the additional links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Driver Delay

9.105 As set out in the Assessment Methodology section of the July 2024 ES chapter, the driver delay information has been taken from the Early Phases completed development stage as a proxy to understand the potential changes in driver delay.

Journey Times (Corridors)

9.106 Tables 9A 31R and 9A 32R present the amended AM and PM peak changes in journey time predicted to occur in 2031 as a result of the Early Phases demolition and construction stage The journey time sections and links remain as per the July 2024 ES and no new additional sections have been considered as these reflect the agreed VISSIM extents and modelling. As the VISSIM modelling has progressed through the auditing process (VMAP14) this has resulted in the requirement to re-run the future baseline without Proposed Development scenarios, as such these will differ from those presented in the July 2024 ES.

Table 9A.31R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Journey Time Results Comparison (2031 AM Peak) Journey

Along A3218 Lillie Rd

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 185

Table 9A.32R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Journey Time Results Comparison (2031 PM Peak)

Journey time Section 2031 Future Baseline (secs) 2031 Early Phases (Secs) Scale of Effect Route 1 EB

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Table 9A 32R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Journey Time Results Comparison (2031 PM Peak)

Journey time Section 2031 Future Baseline (secs) 2031 Early Phases (Secs) Scale of Effect

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd 316

Minor

Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd 374 365 Minor

Route 3 NB – Along A3220 Warwick Rd 359 455 Moderate to Major

Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd 482

Minor

Route 5 EB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 193 263 Major

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 282 342 Moderate

9.107 Tables 9A 31R and 9A 32R show that for the demolition and construction stage the level of delay increases with the maximum change being 158 seconds on Warwick Rd northbound in the AM peak and 96 seconds in the PM peak

9.108 The revised analysis indicates that the effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases demolition and construction scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because whilst the values have changed as a result of the re-run VISSIM analysis, the scale of effect has returned the same values as the July 2024 ES.

Key Junctions

9.109 Alongside the journey time reviews from the VISSIM modelling, individual junction assessments have been undertaken within the TAA. Tables 9A 33R to 9A 39R presents the junctions and corresponding changes in queues (in terms of passenger car unit (‘PCU’), delays or ratio to capacity (‘RFC’) when comparing the future baseline to the 2031 Early Phases completed development stage as a proxy for the demolition and construction stage

North End Road/Lillie Road Junction

Table 9A.33R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction North End Road / Lillie Road Double Mini Roundabout Junction Modelling Results

Lillie Road/Lillie Road Bus Layover Junction

Table 9A 34R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Lillie Road / Lillie Road Bus Layover Junction Modelling Results

Description

– Early Phases

Lillie Road / Seagrave Junction

Table 9A 35R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Lillie Road / Empress Place / Seagrave Road Priority Junction Modelling Results

2031 Future Baseline

2031 Early Phases

2031 Future Baseline

A4 West Cromwell Road/North End Road Junction

Table 9A 36R:Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road Signal Junction Modelling Results

Arm Description

2031 Future Baseline

North End Road / Beaumont Avenue Junction

Table 9A 37R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction North End Road / Beaumont Avenue Existing Junction

2031 Future Baseline

2031 – Early Phases

A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road Junction

Table 9A 38R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction A4

2031 Future

2031 Early Phases

Table 9A 38R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road Signal Junction Modelling Results Arm Description

Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay

9.115 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage pedestrian and cyclist delay effects at the 32 links presented in Table 9.40 of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.116 Table 9A 40A presents the Early Phases demolition and construction stage pedestrian and cyclist delay effects on the additional 51 links within the study area.

Table 9A 40A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay Effects

Warwick Road/Fenelon Place Junction

Table

2031 Future Baseline

2031 Early Phases

9.110 The Early Phases completed development assessments have been used as a proxy to determine the potential junction impacts during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage.

9.111 The review indicates that the junctions would not experience any material change in operation as a result of the Early Phases (and by proxy the Early Phases demolition and construction stage)

9.112 The junction modelling results show that none of the junctions in the study network are expected to operate with a DoS above 90 % or RFC above 0.85 on any arm in either peak hour.

9.113 Taking into account the junction modelling outcomes the junctions have low sensitivity to changes in delay and the magnitude of impact would be very low, based on the overall forecast performance with the Early Phases in place.

9.114 As such, the junctions are likely to experience temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects and therefore remain as per the July 2024 ES

9A 40A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay Effects

ID Assigned Sensitivity

9.117 The conclusions for the 32 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.118 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.40A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link;

Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road.

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street;

Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns;

Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns;

Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue;

Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road; and

Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

9.119 Through application of the management measures contained within the CTLP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor (not significant):

Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity

9.120 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage pedestrian and cyclist amenity effects at the 32 links presented in Table 9.41 of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.121 Table 9A.41A presents the Early Phases demolition and construction stage pedestrian and cycle amenity effects on the 51 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A.41A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity Effects

Link

74

Table 9A 41A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction

9.123

Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.41A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd; and

Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link;

Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road.

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street;

Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns;

Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns;

Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue;

Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road; and

Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

9.124 Through application of the management measures contained within the CTLP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor (not significant):

Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation

9.125 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage pedestrian and cyclist fear and intimidation effects at the 32 links presented in Table 9.42 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.126 Table 9A.42A presents the Early Phases demolition and construction stage fear and intimidation effects on the 51 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A.42A: Amended Early Phases 2031 Demolition and Construction Fear and Intimidation Effects

Table 9A 42A: Amended Early Phases 2031 Demolition and Construction Fear and Intimidation Effects

9.127 The conclusions for the 32 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.128 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.42, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• No effects (not significant)

Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns;

Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns;

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• temporary, short to medium-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 74 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street;

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road; and

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

9.129 Through application of the management measures contained within the CTLP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor (not significant):

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place; and

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Accidents and Safety

9.130 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage accidents and safety effects at the 32 links presented in Table 9.43 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.131 Table 9A 43A presents the Early Phases demolition and construction stage accidents and safety effects at the 51 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A.43A: Amended Early Phases 2031 Demolition and Construction Accidents and Safety Effects Link Assigned

6.4% -0.4% 15.9% -0.3% 9.5% 3 Very Low Negligible

120 Low -0.4% 18.2% -1.3% 125.0% -0.9% 39.3% 2 Low Negligible

4 Very Low Negligible

123 Medium -2.6% 4.8% -1.7% 17.6% -1.8% 13.3% 10 Medium Minor to Moderate

124 Low 0.8% 5.5% -1.0% 15.6% -0.1% 9.0% 3 Very Low Negligible

9.132 The conclusions for the 32 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.133 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.43, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church; and

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns;

Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns;

Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street; and

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 74 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street;

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road; and

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road; and

Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

9.134 Through application of the management measures contained within the CTLP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor Adverse ( not significant):

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road; and

Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road.

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.135 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage parking and servicing demand effects at the 32 links presented in Table 9.43 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.136 Table 9A.44A presents the Early Phases demolition and construction stage parking and servicing effects for the 51 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 44A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Parking and Servicing Effects

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

Table 9A 44A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Parking and Servicing Effects

Table 9A 44A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Parking and Servicing Effects

Assigned

118

124 Low No changes proposed Very

9.137 The conclusions for the 32 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.138 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.44, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

All links except for 75, 76, 82,86 ,96, 101 and 109

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns;

Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns; and

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

9.139 Through application of the management measures contained within the CTLP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• temporary, short to medium-term, direct Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres.

• temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

Public Transport Demand and Capacity

9.140 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development for the public transport demand and capacity analysis. This is because the trip generation for the public transport modes has not changed at the strategic level and therefore the demand and associated impacts have also not changed.

9.141 It is anticipated that the majority of demolition and construction personnel would travel to/from the Site by public transport. Based on experience of similar projects, it is expected that the overall increase in public transport users during

the peak phase of demolition and construction of the Early Phases stage would be readily accommodated within the available network capacity and would predominantly be undertaken outside of the network peak periods.

Completed Development Effects

9.142 The assessment approach and embedded mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Links Identified and Sensitive Receptors

9.143 The 26 links presented in Table 9.49 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases completed development stage assessment

9.144 Table 9A.49A presents the additional 40 links screened for assessment of the Early Phases 2031 completed development stage. Further detailed information on how the links have been identified is contained in Technical Appendix 9A.1A.

Table 9A 49A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

Link Link Name Link Description Sensitive Receptor Borough Sensitivity

77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Suitable for on-road cycling (on-road advisory cycle lane). No Hammersmith and Fulham

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Link in urban area running through the residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Quiet side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling due to its quiet nature.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

No Hammersmith and Fulham

87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Link in urban area running through the residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Quiet side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling due to its quiet nature.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal

and Fulham

and Fulham

103 A3218

Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

Table 9A 49A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns Link

108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/ stands.

110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. No

111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

Table 9A 49A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

Link

120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

Severance

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides.

Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

and

and Chelsea

and Chelsea

and

and

and Chelsea

9.145 The Early Phases completed development stage severance effects at the 26 links presented in Table 9.50 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.146 Table 9A 50A presents the 2031 Early Phases completed development stage severance effects for the 40 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 50A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Severance Effects

85

Table 9A 50A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Severance Effects

9.148

Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.50A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App; and

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road; and

Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

9.149 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of othersimilar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

Driver Delay

9.150 The effects of the Amended Proposed Development on Driver Delay have been considered above within the 2031 Demolition and Construction assessment - Tables 9A.31R and 9A.32R present the outputs for the journey time analysis along key corridors for the AM and PM peak periods. Tables 9A.33R to 9A.39R present the key junction capacity assessments. This utilised the Key junction and Journey Time analysis for the 2031 Early Phases completed development scenario (as a proxy) and therefore is also valid for the completed development stage and has not been repeated in this section in the interest of proportionality and brevity

Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay

9.151 The Early Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cyclist effects at the 26 links presented in Table 9.60 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.152 Table 9A.60A presents Early Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cyclist delay effects for the 40 additional links within the study area

Table 9A 60A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Pedestrian and Cycle Delay Effects

9.153 The conclusions for the 26 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.154 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.60A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App; and

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road; and

Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

9.155 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity

9.156 The Early Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cyclist amenity effects at the 26 links presented in Table 9.61 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.157 Table 9A.61A presents the Early Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cycle amenity effects for the 40 additional links within the study area.

9.158 The conclusions for the 26 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development 9.159 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.61A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience: •

long-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App; and

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road; and

Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

9.160 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered

that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation

9.161 The Early Phases completed development stage fear and intimidation effects at the 26 links presented in Table 9.62 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.162 Table 9A.62A presents the Early Phases completed development stage fear and intimidation effects for the 40 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 62A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Fear and Intimidation Effects

Assigned

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent ;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App; and

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road; and

Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

9.165 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of othersimilar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd.

Accidents and Safety

9.166 The Early Phases completed development stage accidents and safety effects at the 26 links presented in Table 9.63 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.167 Table 9A 63A presents the scale of effect of the Early Phases completed development stage accidents and safety effects for the 40 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 63A: Amended 2031 Early Phases Completed Development Accidents and Safety Effects

Link Assigned sensitivity AM Peak Change % PM Peak Change

84

85

89

Table 9A 63A: Amended 2031 Early Phases Completed Development Accidents and Safety Effects

9.168 The conclusions for the 26 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.169 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.63A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place;

Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place;

Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square;

Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church; and

Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl;

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres;

Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St;

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd.

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link;

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road; and

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road; and

Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane.

• permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

9.170 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street;

Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road; and

Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.171 The Early Phases completed development stage parking and servicing effects at the 26 links presented in Table 9.64 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.172 Table 9A.64A presents the Early Phases completed development stage parking and servicing effects for the 40 additional links within the study area

Table 9A 64A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Parking and Servicing Effect

Re-configuration of the Layover junction access and increased use could have impacts on parking and servicing for other users.

Table 9A 64A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Parking and Servicing Effect

Link Assigned Sensitivity Change Magnitude of Impact Scale of Effect

111 Low No changes proposed Very Low Negligible

112 Low No changes proposed Very Low Negligible

114 Low No changes proposed Very Low Negligible

115 Low No changes proposed Very Low Negligible

116 Low No changes proposed Very

118

120 Low No changes proposed Very

122

proposed

125 Low No changes proposed Very Low Negligible

126 Medium North of Fenelon place EC access which will change nearby movements and use.

127 Medium South of EC access which will change nearby movements and use.

9.173 The conclusions for the 26 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.174 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.64A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects: All links except for Links 82, 86, 101, 109, 126 and 127

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close; and

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

9.175 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of othersimilar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres; and

Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close; and

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

Public Transport Demand and Capacity

9.176 As demonstrated in Table 9A.7R, no changes to public transport trips have been identified as a result of the updated trip generation for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the public transport demand and capacity effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

9.177 As previously set out, the 2031 Early Phases demolition and construction stage assessment considered the worst-case (peak) demolition and construction traffic flows in September 2028. This peak traffic flow would be the same for both the Early Phases and All Phases.

9.178 Therefore, the updated Early Phases demolition and construction stage effects for the 32 links assessed in the July 2024 ES and the additional 51 links assessed in this addendum are also valid for the All Phases. No further assessment is presented.

Completed Development Effects

9.179 The assessment approach and embedded mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Links Identified and Sensitive Receptors

9.180 The 43 links presented in Table 9.71 of the June 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases completed development stage assessment.

9.181 Table 9A.71A presents the additional 33 links screened for assessment of the 2041 All Phases completed development stage. Further detailed information on how the links have been identified is contained in Technical Appendix 9A.1A.

Table 9A 71A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area running through the residential area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Quiet side road with multiple informal crossing opportunities. Suitable for on-road cycling due to its quiet nature.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

No Hammersmith and Fulham Very Low

87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

88 North End Road south of Archel Road

89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218 Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

101

Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

and Fulham

and Fulham

and Fulham

and Fulham

Table 9A 71A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

Link Link Name Link Description Sensitive Receptor Borough Sensitivity Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Kensington and Chelsea

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands. Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands. Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link Key Junction Link

135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

and Fulham

Hammersmith and Fulham

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

Hammersmith and Fulham Medium

Hammersmith and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham

Table 9A 71A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Assessment Link Screening and Sensitivity

Link

139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

Severance

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving

Link in urban area with pedestrian facilities both sides. Informal and signalised crossing points with dropped kerbs and tactile paving. Bus stops/stands.

Yes

Table 9A 72A: Amended 2041 All Phases Completed Development Severance Effects

and Fulham Very High

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Medium

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Medium

Yes Hammersmith and Fulham Medium

and Fulham High

9.182 The All Phases completed development stage severance effects at the 42 links presented in Table 9.72 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.183 Table 9A.72A presents the All Phases completed development stage severance effects for the 33 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 72A: Amended 2041 All Phases

0.4% 0.5% Very Low Minor 139 Very High 0.2% 1.4% 0.7% Very Low Minor to Moderate

Medium 6.5% 0.8% 3.3% Very Low Negligible to Minor

Medium 12.2% 1.1% 6.0% Very Low Negligible to Minor 142 Medium 9.0% 0.3% 3.8% Very Low Negligible to Minor 143 High 3.2% 1.6% 2.3% Very Low Minor

9.184 The conclusions for the 42 links presented in the June 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

9.185 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.72A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• No Effects (not significant)

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane;

Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• permanent, long-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street;

Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall; and

Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• permanent, long-term direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

9.186 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

Driver Delay

Journey Time (Corridors)

9.187 Table 9A 73R and 9A 74R present the AM and PM peak changes in journey time occurring between the 2041 Future Baseline and 2041 All Phases completed development stage.

Table 9A.73R: Amended 2041 All Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2041 AM Peak)

Journey Time (Seconds) 2041 Future Baseline 2041 All Phases Scale of Effect

Route 1 EB – Along A4

Route 1 WB – Along A4 321

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd 318 400 Minor to Moderate

Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd 382 495 Moderate

Route 3 NB – Along A3220 Warwick Rd 376 507 Major

Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd 678 665 Minor

Route 5 EB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 296 440 Major

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 199 223 Minor

Table 9A.74R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2041 PM Peak)

Journey time (Seconds) 2041 Future Baseline 2041 All Phases Scale of

Route 1 EB – Along A4 286 301 Minor

Route 1 WB – Along A4 303 310 Minor

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd 334 427 Moderate

Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd 365 390 Minor

Route 3 NB – Along A3220 Warwick Rd 362 440 Minor to Moderate

Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd 505 500 Minor

Route 5 EB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 201 347 Major

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd 347 442 Moderate

9.188 Tables 9A 73R and 9A 74R show that journey times generally increase as a result of the All Phases completed development. The largest increases are witnessed on Warwick Road northbound and Lillie Road eastbound in the AM peak when increases of 131 and 144 seconds respectively are anticipated. In the PM peak the largest increase is 146 seconds which is witnessed on Lillie Road Eastbound

9.189 The updated analysis outlines that the following assessment links within the study area would experience the following effects (compared to the July 2024 ES conclusions):

• Route 2 SB - from Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

• Route 5 WB - from Major Adverse to Moderate Adverse (significant).

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Key Junctions

9.190 Key Junctions were also assessed under the 2041 future baseline and with the All Phases completed development stage. Tables 9A 75R to 9A 83R present the corresponding results.

North End Road/Lillie Road Junction

Table 9A.75R: Amended All Phases Completed Development North End Road / Lillie Road Double Mini Roundabout Junction

Lillie Road Seagrave Junction

Table 9A 77R: Amended All Phases

2041 Future Baseline

2041 Future Baseline

Table

A4 West Cromwell Road/North End Road Junction Table 9A.78R: Amended All Phases

Lillie Road/Lillie Road Bus Layover Junction

North End Road / Beaumont Avenue Junction

Table 9A 79R: Amended All Phases Completed

/ Beaumont Avenue Existing Junction

A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road Junction

Table 9A 80A: Amended All Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road Signal Junction Modelling Results

2041 Future Baseline

Warwick Road/Fenelon Place Junction

Table 9A 81R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Warwick Road / Fenelon Place Signal Junction Modelling Results

Arm Description

2041 Future Baseline

2041 All Phases

Old Brompton Road / Eardley Crescent Junction

Table 9A.82R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Old Brompton Road / Eardley Crescent Junction

Modelling Results

Brompton Road/Warwick Road Junction

9.191 Whilst the junctions are subject to increased delays, this is offset by the improvements for non-motorised users who have improved crossing facilities. The TAA sets out the mitigation strategies to be adopted. These are considered in the additional mitigation section of this chapter.

9.192 Considering the junction modelling outcomes, the junctions have low sensitivity to changes in delay and the magnitude of change would be very low, based on the overall forecast performance with the Amended Proposed Development in place.

9.193 As such, applying professional judgment and that users would already be subject to large delays without the Amended Proposed Development in the future year, the junctions are likely to experience permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects

Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

9.194 The All Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cycle delay effects at the 42 links presented in Table 9.84 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.195 Table 9A.84A presents the All Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cycle delay effects for the 33 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A.84A: Amended 2041 All Phases Completed Development Pedestrian and Cycle Delay Effects

Table 9A 83R: Amended

Very Low Minor to Moderate

137 Very High -1.5% 1.4% -0.2% Very Low Minor to Moderate

138 High 0.9% 0.4% 0.5% Very Low Minor

139 Very High 0.2% 1.4% 0.7% Very Low Minor to Moderate

140 Medium 6.5% 0.8% 3.3% Very Low Negligible to Minor

141 Medium 12.2% 1.1% 6.0% Very Low Negligible to Minor

142 Medium 9.0% 0.3% 3.8% Very Low Negligible to Minor

143 High 3.2% 1.6% 2.3% Very Low Minor

9.196 The conclusions for the 42 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.197 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.84A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• No Effects (not significant);

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane;

Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• permanent, long-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street;

Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall; and

Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• permanent, long-term direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

9.198 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of othersimilar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity

9.199 The All Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cycle amenity effects at the 42 links presented in Table 9.85 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.200 Table 9A.85A presents the All Phases completed development stage pedestrian and cycle amenity effects for the 33 additional links within the study area

Table 9A 85A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity Effects

Link

Table 9A 85A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity Effects

9.201 The conclusions for the 42 links presented in the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.202 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.85A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• No Effects (not significant)

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane;

Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• permanent, long-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street;

Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall; and

Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• permanent, long-term direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

9.203 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation

9.204 The All Phases completed development stage fear and intimidation effects at the 42 links presented in Table 9.86 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.205 Table 9A.86A presents the All Phases completed development stage fear and intimidation effects for the 33 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 86A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Fear and Intimidation Effects

9.206 The conclusions for the 42 links presented in the June 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.207 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.86A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• No Effects (not significant):

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• permanent, long-term direct Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane;

Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• permanent, long-term direct Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street;

Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall; and

Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• permanent, long-term direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

9.208 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of other similar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road;

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road;

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road; and

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

Accidents and Safety

9.209 The All Phases completed development stage accident and safety effects at the 42 links presented in Table 9.87 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.210 Table 9A.87A presents the 2041 All Phases completed development stage accident and safety effects for the 33 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A 87A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Accidents and Safety Effects

9A 87A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Accidents and Safety Effects Link

9.211 The conclusions for the 42 links presented in the June 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.212 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.87A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road;

Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road;

Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close;

Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road;

Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place;

Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link; and

Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road;

Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link;

Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218;

Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St;

Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews;

Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns;

Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road; and

Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd;

Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl; and

Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road;

Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street; and

Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road ;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

9.213 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of othersimilar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant):

Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street;

Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street;

Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street;

Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road;

Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street; and

Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.214 The All Phases completed development parking and servicing effects at the 42 links presented in Table 9.88 of the June 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.215 Table 9A.88A presents the All Phases completed development stage parking and servicing for the 33 additional links within the study area.

Table 9A.88A: Amended All Phases Completed

Table 9A 88A: Amended All Phases Completed Development Parking and Servicing Effects

9.216 The conclusions for the 42 links presented in the June 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

9.217 Based on the analysis summarised in Table 9A.88A, it can be concluded that the following additional links within the study area would experience:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects:

All links except for Link 86 and Link 101

• permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects:

Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

9.218 Through application of the management measures contained within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP, the magnitude of impact on these links would be reduced. Therefore, based upon experience of othersimilar scale projects it is considered that the assessment links within the study area where significant adverse effects have been identified, the effects would be reduced to:

• permanent, long-term, direct, Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

Public Transport Demand and Capacity

9.219 As demonstrated in Table 9A.12R, no changes to public transport trips have been identified as a result of the updated trip generation for the Amended Proposed Development Accordingly, the public transport demand and capacity effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Additional Mitigation

9.220 ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description set out the embedded mitigation attributable to the Amended Proposed Development.

9.221 This section sets out the additional mitigation proposed for the Amended Proposed Development

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Stage

9.222 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid and no further demolition and construction mitigation is required for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

Completed Development Stage

Pedestrians

9.223 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid, with the exception of the following:

• A4 West Cromwell Road

The proposals at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction have been refined to respond to the amended Warwick Road Corridor alternative cycle access strategy and to account for the S106 contributions secured from the 100 West Cromwell Road cumulative scheme to ntroduce a Healthy Streets improvement. The updated junction proposals would mitigate the Amended Proposed Development’s effects and are intended to be secured in the scenario that the alternative proposals (to be developed and delivered by TfL) and funded by 100 West Cromwell Road for the junction, do not come forwards before the completion of the Early Phases

• Lillie Road crossings

Following stakeholder feedback, a mitigation scheme for the Lillie Road/North End Road has been developed. This focuses on improvements to pedestrian priority. The layout would involve placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings

9.224 The following additional mitigation are proposed:

• Earls Court Road

Following stakeholder feedback, a scheme for Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road has been developed. This proposal involves bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms of the junction that are currently uncontrolled, into the control of the traffic signal junction.

• Cluny Mews

An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews would require a stepped connection alongside a lift to overcome the level difference in this area. A concept for how this access could be achieved is shown in Figure 6 of the TAA. This would involve constructing a set of steps and lift on land outside of the control of the Applicant. The link would deliver a pedestrian connection. Delivery of this link would be subject to third party agreement.

If this connection is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided. This would provide a set of steps and lift therefore provide pedestrian connectivity.

Cyclists

9.225 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid with the exception of the following:

• Following stakeholder feedback the previously proposed two-way cycle track on Warwick Road has been removed from the mitigation package. Instead, the following alternative cycle accesses have been developed for trips originating from/destinated to the east and north associated with the Amended Proposed Development: Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road to the south for access to Quietway 15 and trips to/from the east.

Cluny Mews (subject to third party agreement) with an improvement scheme providing onward connectivity to the north and east.

Connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road with an improvement scheme providing onward connectivity to the north and east.

Connection to Fenelon Place through the basement of 100 West Cromwell Road.

• Lillie Road / Old Brompton Road Corridor:

The July 2024 additional mitigation proposals for the cycle improvements on Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders (most notably the revisions around Plot EC22 (introduction of limits of deviation on Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm parameter plan). In addition, RBKC has now constructed the pedestrian and cycle crossing at the Old Brompton Road junction with Kempsford Gardens and therefore the improvements would be designed to tie into this scheme.

• Lillie Road / North End Road Junction:

Following stakeholder feedback a mitigation scheme for the Lillie Road/North End Road has been developed. This focuses on improvements to cycle priority. The layout would involve placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings

9.226 The following additional mitigation are proposed:

• Cluny Mews:

An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews would require a stepped connection alongside a lift to overcome the level difference in this area. A concept for how this access could be achieved is shown in Figure 6 of the TAA. This would involve constructing a set of steps and lift on land outside of the control of the Applicant. The link would deliver a cycle connection. Delivery of this link would be subject to third party agreement.

If this connection is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided. This would provide a set of steps and lift therefore provide cycle connectivity.

9.227 These amended additional mitigation proposals have been relied upon to inform the residual assessment of the additional 70 links and would be secured through the completion of the S106 agreement and highway agreements under Section 278 of the 1980 Highways Act.

9.228 In respect of the 67 links assessed in the July 2024 ES, the amended additional mitigation proposals are considered commensurate with that outlined within the July 2024 ES and as such would result in similar improvements. Accordingly, the residual conclusions of the 67 links previously assessed remain valid.

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.229 Consistent with the July 2024 position, no additional mitigation is proposed

Public Transport Users

9.230 Although the assessment for public transport users has not changed, following stakeholder feedback, the following additional mitigation would be required for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

Bus Improvements

9.231 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid with the exception of the following addition:

• A review of the design of the Lillie Road Bus Layover with the aim of developing an illustrative layout that can be agreed in principle with the Transport Stakeholders and secured as part of the S106

Station Improvements

9.232 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. By way of an update, TfL has requested that a Station Option Study (commensurate with TfL’s Pathways Stage 2 Option Study) is prepared for West Brompton station. The study is currently underway; however, the principles of the mitigation strategy remain as agreed in principle and as set out in the July 2024 ES.

Vehicle Users

9.233 The position on additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Stage

9.234 The position on additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Completed Development Stage

Pedestrians

9.235 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, as amended for the Early Phases above Furthermore, the following additional mitigation are proposed:

• A4 West Cromwell Road

A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue

Figure 70 and Figure 71 of the TA set out the reconfiguration proposals for parking on Beaumont Avenue. The parking that is currently half-on-half-off the carriageway will be relocated into a full size parking bay on the northern side of the carriageway to maximise carriageway space. Beaumont Avenue itself will be realigned at its eastern end to align with the new access road

In addition, to assist in maximising highway capacity and enhancing pedestrian connectivity it is proposed that the pedestrian crossing located immediately north of the Beaumont Avenue junction with North End Road is relocated. This would require the closure of Baron’s Court Road to general traffic. It would also tie into the area of public realm proposed to facilitate the creation of an additional entrance to West Kensington Station. Completed development served from Beaumont Avenue would only come forwards once the LBD has been vacated. Closure of Baron’s Court Road to general traffic would require a traffic regulation order and separate consultation by LBHF. To give further comfort that this mitigation is appropriately designed, it is proposed that this measure falls within the monitor and manage strategy that is set out within Section 8 of the TAA. Whilst the principles of the mitigation are set out, the monitor and manage strategy would allow for a dynamic review of the proposed design in response to any changes in the future years.

9.236 The amended additional mitigation measures have been relied upon to inform the residual assessment of the 70 additional links and would be secured through the completion of the s106 agreement and highway agreements under section 278 of the 1980 Highways Act.

9.237 In respect of the 67 links assessed in the July 2024 ES, the amended additional mitigation proposals are considered commensurate with that outlined within the July 2024 ES and as such would result in similar improvements. Accordingly, the residual conclusions of the 67 links previously assessed remain valid.

Cyclists

9.238 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, as amended for the Early Phases above Furthermore the following additional mitigation is proposed:

• A4 West Cromwell Road:

A cycle crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Warwick Road Corridor, alternative cycle access via:

Connection across the A4 West Cromwell Road via a new pedestrian and cycle crossing connecting with Edith Villas; and

Beaumont Avenue where an enhanced crossing facility connecting with Barons Court Road is proposed.

• Beaumont Avenue:

Figure 70 and Figure 71 of the TA set out the reconfiguration proposals for parking on Beaumont Avenue. The parking that is currently half-on-half-off the carriageway will be relocated into a full size parking bay on

the northern side of the carriageway to maximise carriageway space. Beaumont Avenue itself will be realigned at its eastern end to align with the new access road

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.239 The position on additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Public Transport

Bus Improvements

9.240 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid as amended in the Early Phases of this addendum

Station Improvements

9.241 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid as amended in the Early Phases of this addendum for West Brompton Station A Station Option Study (commensurate with TfL’s Pathways Stage 2 Option Study) is also being prepared for West Kensington station. The study is currently underway; however, the principles of the mitigation strategy remain as agreed in principle and as set out in the July 2024 ES.

Vehicle Users

9.242 The position on additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. However, the following additional mitigation has been identified for the Amended Proposed Development:

• North End Road/Beaumont Avenue – it is proposed to relocate the crossing point further north to provide additional space for vehicles turning right out of Beaumont Avenue to wait prior to the stop line for the pedestrian crossing which is currently located immediately to the north of the junction.

Enhancement Measures

9.243 The enhancement measures as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. Further detail is provided in the TAA.

Residual Effects

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction

9.244 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 32 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.245 In respect of the additional 51 links considered in this addendum, the only links that would experience significant adverse demolition and construction parking and servicing demand effects are:

• Links 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close.

9.246 These links are adjacent to the key access points to the Site. Given that the demolition and construction stage includes the operational Early Phases traffic as well, it is considered likely that the effects of this scenario are beyond worst-case and that in reality the effects would be of a lesser scale.

9.247 Regardless, CEMP measures would be put in place to ensure that likely effects are appropriately managed.

9.248 Adopting a conservative approach, the residual effects would be as reported in the main assessment.

Completed Development

9.249 The additional mitigation measures set out above would reduce effects on pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users. However, on a congested highway network this would likely be at the expense of vehicle users. On the basis of the additional mitigation package identified and used in this chapter the individual effects of the Early Phases are considered below.

Severance

9.250 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 26 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.251 The additional 40 inks have been assessed as likely to experience Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.252 The additional mitigation would improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. However, the reported effects would remain valid for the residual effect.

Driver Delay

9.253 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed three junctions remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.254 No highway capacity enhancement measures have been identified as part of the additional mitigation for Early Phases. The additional mitigation proposed on the highway network focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. As set out above, delay to vehicles may increase on corridors as a result of the additional mitigation. This is due in part to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which add further delay to vehicle journey times.

9.255 The following junctions were re-run with the additional mitigation in place, with results presented in Tables 9A.1N - 9A3N and Table 9A.96R:

• A4 West Cromwell Road/ North End Road Junction;

• Earls Court Road / Old Brompton Road Junction;

• A4 West Cromwell Road/ Warwick Road Junction, and

• North End Road/ Lillie Road Double Mini Roundabout

Junctions

A4 West Cromwell Road/ North End Road Junction

Table 9A 1N: Early Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road Signal Junction Modelling Results – with Additional Mitigation Arm

Table 9A 1N: Early Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / North

Earls Court Road / Old Brompton Road Junction

Table 9A 2N: Early Phases Completed Development Earls Court / Old Brompton Road Signal Junction Modelling Results

Description

A4 West Cromwell Road/ Warwick Road Junction

Table 9A 96R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road Signal Junction Modelling Results – with Additional Mitigation

Description

2031 Early Phases with Additional Mitigation

Table 9A 96R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road Signal Junction Modelling Results – with Additional Mitigation

Arm Description

North End Road/ Lillie Road Double Mini Junction

Table 9A 3N: Early Phases Completed Development North End Road/ Lillie Road Double Mini Modelling Results

Table 9A 98R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2031 AM Peak)

Journey Time Section 2031 Future Baseline (Secs) – PreAdditional Mitigation

Route

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

Route 3 NB – Along A3220 Warwick Rd

Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

Early Phases (Secs) – PreAdditional Mitigation

Early Phases (Secs)

2031 Early Phases with Additional Mitigation

Junction 2 - North End

9.256 The additional mitigation results indicate that the junctions would operate within capacity with the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases. Whilst the junctions are shown to be approaching capacity, it should be noted that the improvements here are focused on improving pedestrian and cyclists crossing opportunities, which would inevitably result in a disbenefit to vehicular movements.

9.257 As such the key junctions reviewed are likely to experience permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects with the additional mitigation measures in place Journey Times (Corridors)

9.258 The following three journey time routes were concluded as likely to experience permanent, long-term, direct Moderate to Major (significant) effects

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd;

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd; and

• Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

9.259 The same routes and effects were recorded in the July 2024 ES. It is considered that the proposed additional mitigation at the junctions and corridors would improve severance and pedestrian / cyclist amenity.

9.260 However, in terms of driver delay, the journey times would increase as a result of the Early Phases completed development Table 9A 98R presents the pre-and post-additional mitigation for the Early Phases AM Peak.

Route 5 EB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

9.261 In the Early Phases AM peak the greatest changes in journey times are witnessed on Route 4 Southbound (A3220 Earls Court Road), Route 5 Eastbound (Lillie Road) and Route 3 Northbound (A3220 Warwick Road). This is likely the result of the implementation of the changes to the Earls Court Road/Old Brompton Road junction. Whilst the modifications are relatively minor the level of congestion in the model means that a small change to the signal timings has a large impact on journey times in the area.

9.262 Table 9A 99R presents the pre-and post-additional mitigation for the Early Phases PM Peak.

Table 9A.99R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2031 PM Peak)

Journey

Route

(Secs)

(Secs)

9.263 With the additional mitigation in place, the scale of effect changes for some routes.

9.264 In the Early Phases PM peak, the greatest changes in journey time are witnessed on Route 5 Westbound and Eastbound (Lillie Road) and Route 4 Southbound (A3220 Earls Court Road). This is likely the result of the implementation of the changes to the Earls Court Road/Old Brompton Road unction. Whilst the modifications are relatively minor the level of congestion in the model means that a small change to the signal timings has a large impact on journey times in the area.

9.265 The analysis of residual effects confirms that Route 4 SB would experience a change (compared to the July 2024 ES conclusions) resulting in a Major Adverse (significant) effect (from the previously reported Minor Adverse effect).

9.266 All other effects as reported in the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay and Amenity

9.267 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 26 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.268 The additional 40 links were assessed as likely to experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.269 The additional mitigation would improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. However, the reported effects would remain valid for the residual effect.

Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation

9.270 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 26 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.271 The additional 40 inks were assessed as likely to experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.272 The additional mitigation would improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. However, the reported effects would remain valid for the residual effect.

Accidents and Safety

9.273 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 26 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.274 The assessment of the additional links identifies that the following links within the study area would experience permanent, long-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

9.275 A other links within the study area would experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.276 Additional mitigation has been proposed which focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. As such, this is likely to have a benefit in terms of accident reduction and improved safety of vulnerable users.

9.277 Applying professional judgment and experience, it is considered that the magnitude of impact for the seven links would reduce resulting in a permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) residual effects

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.278 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 26 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.279 The assessment identifies the following links within the study area would experience permanent, long-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant) effects:

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close; and

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

9.280 A other links within the study area would experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.281 The residual effects would remain unchanged following application of the additional mitigation.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction

9.282 For the reasons set out in the Early Phases residual effects assessment, the reported All Phases effects are unchanged for the residual effects both in respect of the July 2024 ES and the main assessment in this chapter

Completed Development

9.283 The additional mitigation measures set out would reduce effects on pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users. However, on a congested highway network this would likely be at the expense of vehicle users. On the basis of the additional mitigation package identified and used in this chapter the individual residual effects of the All Phases are considered in more detail below.

Severance

9.284 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 42 links remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.285 The additional 33 links were assessed as likely to experience Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.286 The additional mitigation would improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. However, the reported effects would remain unchanged for the residual effects

Driver Delay

Junction Delay

9.287 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed three junctions in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.288 The only highway capacity enhancement measure identified as part of the additional mitigation is at the North End Road/Beaumont Avenue junction The majority of the additional mitigation proposed on the highway network focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. Delay to vehicles may increase on corridors as a result of the additional mitigation that focuses on pedestrian and cycle priority. This is due in part to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which inherently add further delay to vehicular journey times.

9.289 The following junctions were re-run with the additional mitigation in place, with results presented in Tables 9A.4N - 9A.6N and Table 9A.102R:

• A4 West Cromwell Road/ North End Road Junction (including Beaumont Avenue junction);

• Earls Court Road / Old Brompton Road Junction;

• A4 West Cromwell Road/ Warwick Road Junction, and

• North End Road/ Lillie Road Double Mini Roundabout

A4 West Cromwell Road/ North End Road Junction

Table 9A 4N: All Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road Signal Junction Modelling Results – with Additional Mitigation

Table 9A 4N: All Phases Completed Development A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road Signal Junction Modelling Results – with Additional Mitigation

Earls Court Road / Old Brompton Road Junction

Table 9A 5N: All Phases Completed Development Earls Court Road / Old Brompton Road Signal Junction Modelling Results

2041 All Phases with Additional Mitigation

A4 West Cromwell Road/ Warwick Road Junction

Table 9A.102R: Amended All Phases Completed Development A4 West

North End Road/ Lillie Road Double Mini Junction

Table 9A 6N: All Phases Completed Development North End Road/ Lillie Road Double Mini Modelling Results

Arm Description

2041 All Phases with Additional Mitigation

9.290 The results of the junction modelling show that the A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road, North End Road / Beaumont Avenue and North End Road / Lillie Road double mini roundabout would continue to operate within capacity, even with the addition of the Proposed Development and mitigation.

9.291 A4 West Cromwell Road/North End Road – a maximum DoS of 101% is identified on the North End Road (South) Ahead movement in the 2041 All Phases AM peak scenario. Whilst it is acknowledged that this junction operates at theoretical capacity, the delivery of a new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 in combination with improvements at the North End Road junction and Beaumont Avenue are considered beneficial for active travel users and align with the objectives set out in the London Plan under Policy T1. Acknowledging that the mitigation proposals would only come forwards once the LBD has been vacated, and the proposals are assessed in a future year of 2041, it is proposed that the scope of mitigation at this junction is included within the scope of the monitor and manage approach set out within the TAA.

9.292 As such, the residual effects assessment has concluded that key junctions would likely experience permanent, longterm, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.293 It is considered that the proposed additional mitigation at the junctions and corridors would improve severance and pedestrian / cyclist amenity.

Journey Time Delay (Corridors)

9.294 In terms of driver delay, the journey times would increase as a result of the All Phases completed development Table 9A 104R presents the pre-and post-additional mitigation for the All Phases AM Peak.

Table 9A 104R: All Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2041 AM Peak) Journey Time Section

Table 9A 104R: All Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2041 AM Peak)

Journey Time Section 2041 Future Baseline (Secs) –Pre-Additional Mitigation 2041 All Phases (Secs) –Pre-Additional Mitigation 2041 All Phases (Secs)

Route 5 EB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

9.295 In the All Phases AM peak the greatest changes in journey time are witnessed on Route 4 Southbound (A3220 Earls Court Road), Route 5 Eastbound (Lillie Road) and both northbound and southbound on Route 2 (North End Road). This is the result of the cumulative effects of the changes proposed on the A4 West Cromwell Road (new pedestrian and cycle crossing) and implementation of the changes to the Earls Court Road/Old Brompton Road junction.

9.296 Table 9A.105R presents the pre-and post-additional mitigation for the All Phases PM Peak.

Table 9A 105R: All Phases Completed Development Journey Time Results Comparison (2041 PM Peak)

Journey Time Section 2041 Future Baseline (Secs) –Pre-Additional Mitigation

4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

Along A3218 Lillie

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie

9.297 In the All Phases PM peak the greatest changes in journey time are witnessed on Route 4 Southbound (A3220 Earls Court Road), Route 5 Eastbound (Lillie Road) and both northbound and southbound on Route 2 (North End Road). This is the result of the cumulative effects of the changes proposed on the A4 West Cromwell Road (new pedestrian and cycle crossing) and implementation of the changes to the Earls Court Road/Old Brompton Road junction.

9.298 The mitigation proposed outlined above and set out in detail within the TAA focuses on improving conditions for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users. Where improvements to the highway network have been proposed that seek to improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists these may have an adverse effect on other road users such as vehicle drivers or bus passengers. However, the London Plan and Mayor’s Transport Strategy support travel by sustainable modes and seek to achieve a mode share of 80 % of all trips undertaken by public transport, walking and cycling by 2041. To achieve these targets it is likely that re-allocation of road space to encourage and facilitate trips by sustainable modes will be required. The mitigation approach taken in the TAA is therefore considered to fully align with these policies.

9.299 The updated analysis of residual effects outlines that the following assessment links within the study area would experience the following effects (compared to the July 2024 ES conclusions):

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd - a change from Minor to Moderate to Major Adverse (significant).

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd - a change from Minor to Moderate to Moderate Adverse (significant)

• Route 4 SB would - a change from Minor to Major Adverse (significant)

9.300 The additional mitigation measures have been relied upon to inform the residual assessment and would be secured through the completion of the S106 agreement and highway agreements under Section 278 of the 1980 Highways Act

Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay and Amenity

9.301 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 42 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.302 The additional 33 links have been assessed as likely to experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.303 The additional mitigation would improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. However, the reported effects would remain unchanged for the residual effect.

Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation

9.304 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 42 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.305 The additional 33 links have been assessed as likely to experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.306 The additional mitigation would improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. However, the reported effects would remain unchanged for the residual effect.

Accidents and Safety

9.307 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 42 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.308 The assessment identifies the following links within the study area would experience temporary, short- to medium-term, direct Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant):

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Table 9A.106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Phases Demolition and Construction

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd ;

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road;

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane; and

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

9.309 All other links within the study area would experience Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effects.

9.310 Additional mitigation has been proposed which focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. As such, this is likely to have a benefit in terms of accident reduction and improved safety of vulnerable users.

9.311 Applying professional judgment and experience, it is considered that the magnitude of impact for the eight links would reduce resulting in a permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse (not significant) residual effects.

Parking and Servicing Demand

9.312 The residual effects reported for the previously assessed 42 links in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.313 Whilst some changes in parking and servicing would occur as a result of the All Phases, the implementation of the management measures set out within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP would reduce effects on Parking and Servicing.

9.314 Only one additional link was identified from the assessment that would not return a Negligible to Minor Adverse (not significant) effect. Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close was assessed as a medium sensitivity link with a medium magnitude of impact resulting in a Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant effect). The same effect would occur following application of the additional mitigation.

Public Transport Demand and Capacity

9.315 The enhancement measures and residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

9.316 Table 9.106 of the July 2024 ES remains valid for the 67 links previously assessed.

9.317 In respect of the 70 additional links, Table 9A.106A presents the assessment conclusions reached in this addendum.

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road

• Lillie Road / Bus Layover

• Lillie Road / Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

Change in Driver Delay

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 WB – Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 1 EB - Along A4

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd.

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road .Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

(not significant)

(significant)

(significant)

(significant)

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay None required Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End RdLink 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road .

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road Change

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

in Fear and Intimidation

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in Fear and Intimidation

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

Change in Fear and Intimidation

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 4 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction Change in Accidents and Safety

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• All links except for 75, 76, 82,86 ,96, 101 and 109. Change

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

Change in parking and servicing demand None required Negligible to Minor (not significant)

• Link 109A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres Change in parking and servicing demand

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close Change in parking and servicing demand

Completed Development

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction Link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

Change in Severance

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders

(significant)

Negligible (not significant)

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

Change in Severance

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Change in Severance Minor (not significant)

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road

• Lillie Road /Bus Layover

• Lillie Road /Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place.

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 WB - Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 1 EB - Along A4

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders

Delay

additional mitigation is identified. Negligible to Minor (not significant)

No additional mitigation for vehicle drivers is proposed. The improvements seek to improve conditions across the study area for pedestrians and cyclists. The increase in delay is due in part to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which inherently add further delay to vehicular journey times.

(not significant)

to Moderate (significant)

(significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd (significant)

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St Change in

• Link .82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square.

• Link .92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

and Cycle Delay

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders.

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd.

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd Change in Accidents and Safety

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Link Court

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

Change in Accidents and Safety

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• All links except for Links 82, 86, 101, 109, 126 and 127

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

Local Bus stops

• West Kensington Estate Stop BT

• West Kensington Stop S

• West Kensington Stop T

Change in parking and servicing demand

Change in parking and servicing demand

Change in parking and servicing demand

Change in parking and servicing demand None identified.

Change in public transport demand and capacity

• Inclusion of a commencing bus stop within the layout for Route 190

• Earls Court Road Stop A Change in public transport demand and capacity

• West Brompton Station Stop O

• Earls Court Road Stop C

• West Brompton Station Stop P

• West Kensington Estate Stop BS

• West Cromwell Road Stop E

• Empress State Building Stop BB

• Empress State Building Stop BA

All Phases

Demolition and Construction

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• .Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

Change in public transport demand and capacity

to Moderate (significant)

(not significant)

• Financial contributions, secured by S106 agreement or condition (if required) for improvements to bus services and/or bus infrastructure.

• Reconfiguration of the Lillie Road Bus Layover

(not significant)

(not significant)

Change in Severance None required

Change in Severance

(not significant)

Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road .

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road Change in Driver Delay No additional mitigation is

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Lillie Road / Bus Layover

• Lillie Road / Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 WB - Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd Change in Driver Delay

• Route 1 EB - Along A4

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Link 86 - Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

required

(not significant)

to Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

to Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity None required

Change in Fear and Intimidation None required

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in Fear and Intimidation

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 4 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

significant)

Change in Fear and Intimidation None required Negligible to Minor (not significant)

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road Change in Fear and Intimidation

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

Change in Accidents and Safety

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• All links except for 75, 76, 82,86 ,96, 101 and 109.

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

in parking and servicing demand

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in severance

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

Change in severance

to Moderate (significant)

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road

• Lillie Road / Bus Layover

• Lillie Road / Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place

• Old Brompton Road / Eardley Crescent

• Old Brompton Road / Warwick Road

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 EB - Along A4

• Route 1 WB - Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

Change in severance

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

Change in driver delay

Change in driver delay

• No additional mitigation for drivers is proposed. The improvements set out in the additional mitigation sections primarily seek to improve access across the area for pedestrians and cyclists. The increase in delay are due in part to the introduction of measures that improve Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd; and

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

Change in driver delay conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which inherently add further delay to vehicular journey times.

(significant)

Change in pedestrian and cycle delay

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required)

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

Change in pedestrian and cyclist amenity

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

Change in pedestrian and cyclist amenity

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings.

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required)

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road

Negligible to Minor (not significant)

(not significant)

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required)

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

Change in pedestrian fear and intimidation None required.

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

in accidents and safety

• All links except for Link 86 and Link 101 Change in parking and servicing demand

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd Change in parking and servicing demand

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

(not significant)

to Minor (not significant)

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Table 9A 106A: Amended Summary of Residual Transport and Accessibility Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

Local Bus stops

• West Kensington Estate Stop BT

Change in public transport demand and capacity

• Inclusion of a commencing bus stop within the layout for Route 190

• Financial contributions, secured by S106 agreement or condition (if required) for improvements to bus services and/or bus infrastructure

• Earls Court Road Stop C

• West Kensington Stop S

• West Brompton Station Stop O

• West Cromwell Road Stop E

• West Brompton Station Stop P

• Empress State Building Stop BB

• Empress State Building Stop BA

• West Kensington Estate Stop BS

• West Kensington Stop T

Notes:

* - = Adverse/ + = Beneficial/ +/- = Neutral;

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

9.318 The valid residual effects reported in the July 2024 ES and the additional/amended residual effects reported in this addendum are considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Inter-Project Effects

9.319 There are no material changes to the list of cumulative schemes which alter the effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES and so these remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

9.320 Table 9A.107A provides a summary of the likely cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and the Mund Street School site.

• Reconfiguration of the Lillie Road Bus Layover Minor (not significant)

• Earls Court Road Stop A Negligible (not significant)

(not significant)

Table 9A.107A: Amended Cumulative Effects - Transport and Accessibility Screening No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effect Likely Reason Cumulative Effect Likely Reason

Early Phases

18 Mund Street, 103 Gibbs Green Close, London, W14 9NE No

Amended Proposed Development would not use the Mund Street / Aisgill Avenue links and so potential for conflict is unlikely. Wider construction access routes may coincide; however, the contractors would engage with the relevant developers and LBHF to discuss the potential overlap with this construction site and seek to mitigate cumulative impacts, if necessary. This is considered standard practice.

No The Mund Street site seeks to deliver a permit free development and would not generate significant numbers of movements (operational or servicing)

All Phases No

Amended Proposed Development would not use the Mund Street / Aisgill Avenue links and so potential for conflict is unlikely.

No The Mund Street site seeks to deliver a permit free development and would not generate significant numbers of movements (operational or servicing)

Table 9A 107A: Amended Cumulative Effects - Transport and Accessibility Screening

No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction

Wider construction access routes may coincide; however, the contractors would engage with the relevant developers and LBHF to discuss the potential overlap with this construction site and seek to mitigate cumulative impacts, if necessary. This is considered standard practice.

9.321 Reviewing the public consultation material for the Mund Street school site scheme, the development is forecast to start construction in 2027, which would coincide with construction activity of the Amended Proposed Development. However, construction access for the Amended Proposed Development would not use the Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue links and so potential for conflict at those points immediately west of the Site is unlikely.

9.322 Wider construction access routes may coincide; however the contractors would engage with the relevant developers and LBHF to discuss the potential overlap with this construction site and seek to mitigate cumulative impacts, if necessary.

9.323 In terms of completed development impacts and effects, it is noted that the Mund Street scheme is to be a permit free development, and seeks to deliver approximately 8 - 10 blue badge spaces when complete. Reviewing the consultation material indicates that complimentary pedestrian routes and connections would also be delivered.

9.324 Given that limited vehicular movements from residents would be generated, these are considered unlikely to impact on the wider links or assessment study area and therefore the level of change / impact would be negligible.

9.325 As relevant public information is not available, a high level quantitative assessment of the potential servicing and delivery trips has been undertaken. Applying the same servicing and delivery trip rates as applied in the TAA for the Amended Proposed Development, the Mund Street School site (assuming it remains at 107 units) is forecast to generate 33 daily servicing trips. Of these, 24 are forecast to be vehicular based (vans, motorcycle and 1 x refuse collection vehicle) and 9 would be bicycle based modes (delivery / cargo bikes). Applying the same assumption for peak hour movements, and applying no consolidation, this would reduce to 6 servicing and delivery movements across the hour. This would not have a material impact on the wider network and in turn is unlikely to trigger any assessment threshold on links when applying IEMA guidance.

9.326 As such, whilst located in close proximity, the Mund Street School site would not generate significant volumes of movements.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

9.327 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required minor clarification updates to the assessment.

9.328 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; land use floorspace area schedules. access strategies, cycle and car parking provision of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components and associated updated trip generation.

9.329 The July 2024 ES assessed a total of 67 links across the various assessment and development scenarios. The assessment in the addendum identified that a further 70 highway links were required to be considered based on the IEMA screening criteria and rules across the various scenarios. The links in the July 2024 ES have not been re-assessed as the reported effects are considered to remain valid.

9.330 The additional links considered by development and assessment scenarios are set out as follows;

• 51 additional inks considered as part of the Early Phases and All Phases demolition and construction assessment,

• 40 additional inks considered as part of the Early Phases completed development assessment, and

• 33 additional inks considered as part of the All Phases completed development assessment.

9.331 Information was drawn from the separate TAA which accompanies the Addendum Hybrid Planning Applications and has been prepared in accordance with TfL Guidance.

9.332 In respect of baseline conditions, conditions remain as per the July 2024 ES, except the PTAL analysis which has been updated to the most up-to-date version.

9.333 In respect of the Early Phases demolition and construction stage, the:

• Severance, Pedestrian and Cyclist Delay, Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity, Pedestrian Fear and Intimidation assessments have concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects across all the additional links considered.

• Driver Delay assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects at any of the key junctions considered. In respect of travel journey times, the assessment has concluded that there would not be significant adverse effects at six of the eight corridors. As no additional mitigation is being proposed, the assessment of the journey times identifies the following routes would experience temporary significant adverse driver delay effects:

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd; and

Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

• Accidents and Safety assessment has concluded that at 43 of the 51 additional links considered, there would be no significant adverse accident and safety effects. As no additional mitigation is being proposed, the following links were identified as likely to experience a temporary significant adverse effects:

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road.

• Parking and Servicing Demand assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects at 48 of the 51 additional links considered. As no additional mitigation is being proposed, the following links were identified as likely to experience a temporary significant adverse effect:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access; and

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close.

• Public Transport Demand and Capacity assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES conclusions remain valid.

9.334 Proposed additional mitigation for the Early Phases completed development has been set out above and in the TAA and would provide direct, permanent, long-term positive effects on the adjacent links around them.

9.335 In respect of the Early Phases completed development stage, the:

• Severance, Pedestrian and Cyclists Delay, Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity, Fear and Intimidation assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects across all the additional links considered.

• Driver Delay assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects at any of the key junctions considered. In respect of travel journey times, the assessment has concluded following the application

of additional mitigation, that the following assessment links within the study area would experience significant adverse driver delay effects:

Route 1 EB - Along A4;

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd;

Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd;

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd;

Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd; and

Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

No highway capacity enhancement measures have been identified as part of the additional mitigation. The additional mitigation proposed on the highway network focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. Delay to vehicles may increase along the corridors assessed as a result of the additional mitigation. This is due in part to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which inherently add further delay to vehicular journey times. These additional mitigation measures have been relied upon to inform the residual assessment and would be secured through the completion of the S106 agreement and highway agreements under Section 278 of the 1980 Highways Act.

• Accidents and Safety assessment has concluded that at 33 of the 40 additional links considered, there is unlikely to be any significant adverse pedestrian and cyclist amenity effects. The following links are likely to experience significant adverse effects:

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G; and

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road.

Additional mitigation has been proposed which focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. As such, this is likely to have a benefit in terms of accident reduction and improved safety of vulnerable users. Applying professional judgment and experience, it is considered that the magnitude of impact would reduce resulting in no significant residual effects.

• Parking and Servicing Demand assessment has concluded that at 37 of the 40 additional links considered, there is unlikely to be any significant adverse effects; however, the following links are likely to experience significant adverse effects:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close; and

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road.

Whilst additional mitigation in the form of supporting management strategies set out within the FTP, FDSP and FPDMP would be in place from the Amended Proposed Development, it was concluded that the significant adverse effects would remain on the identified links.

• Public Transport Demand and Capacity assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES conclusions remain valid.

9.336 The All Phases demolition and construction effects conclusion are the same as the Early Phases stage.

9.337 In addition to the Early Phases, proposed additional mitigation for the All Phases completed development has been set out above and in the TAA and would provide direct, permanent, long-term positive effects on the adjacent links around them.

9.338 In respect of the Early Phases completed development stage, the:

• Severance, Pedestrian and Cyclists Delay, Pedestrian and Cyclist Amenity, Fear and Intimidation assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects across all the additional links considered.

• Driver Delay assessment has concluded that there would be no significant adverse effects at any of the key junctions considered. In respect of travel journey times, the assessment has concluded following the application of additional mitigation, that the following assessment links within the study area would experience significant adverse driver delay effects:

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd;

Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd;

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd;

Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

Route 5 EB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd; and

Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

The additional mitigation focuses on improving conditions for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users. Where improvements to the highway network have been proposed that seek to improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists these may have an adverse effect on other road users such as vehicle drivers or bus passengers. However, the London Plan and Mayor’s Transport Strategy support travel by sustainable modes and seek to achieve a mode share of 80% of all trips undertaken by public transport, walking and cycling by 2041. To achieve these targets it is likely that re-allocation of road space to encourage and facilitate trips by sustainable modes will be required. The mitigation approach taken in the TAA is therefore considered to fully align with these policies.

• Accidents and Safety assessment has concluded that at 25 of 33 additional links considered, there is unlikely to be any significant adverse pedestrian and cyclist amenity effects. The following links are likely to experience significant adverse effects;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G;

Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access;

Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place;

Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road;

Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane; and

Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217.

Additional mitigation has been proposed which focuses on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. As such, this is likely to have a benefit in terms of accident reduction and improved safety of vulnerable users. Applying professional judgment and experience, it is considered that the magnitude of impact would reduce resulting in no significant residual effects.

• Parking and Servicing Demand assessment has concluded that at one of the 33 additional links considered is likely to experience significant adverse effects:

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close.

Whilst additional mitigation in the form of supporting management strategies would be in place from the Amended Proposed Development, it was concluded that the significant adverse effects would remain on the identified links.

• Public Transport Demand and Capacity assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES conclusions remain valid.

9.339 Consideration of a potential cumulative scheme at the Mund Street School site has concluded that no inter-project cumulative effects are likely to arise on the basis that standard practice mitigation measures (CEMP, travel planning, parking controls / permits and servicing management) are adopted and secured.

9.340 Therefore, in conclusion, additional and different significant adverse transport and accessibility effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

10A AIR QUALITY

Introduction

10.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely air quality effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the air quality assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building massing, footprint and balconies of the Amended Detailed Component; the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component; as well as the floorspace area schedules of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components

10.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 10: Air Quality and Volume 3, Technical Appendices 10.1-10.3 of the July 2024 ES Most of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

10.3 This chapter is accompanied by the following amended technical appendices within ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Technical Appendix 10A:1A: Amended Legislation, Policy and Consultation;

• Technical Appendix 10A:2A: Amended Assessment Methodology; and

• Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results.

10.4 The introductory text presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid.

Methodology

10.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251 The updated NPPF provides an update to paragraph numbers and does not introduce any new or amended considerations for the air quality assessment

10.6 The Environmental Targets (Fine Particulate Matter) (England) Regulations, 20232 were not referenced in the July 2024 ES. The Regulations have been added to Technical Appendix 10A:1A Legislation, Policy and Consultation but do not introduce any new or amended considerations for the air quality assessment.

10.7 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid

10.8 In respect of local policy and guidance, the documents presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid except for the following:

• The RBKC New Local Plan (2024)3 was adopted on 24 July 2024 The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking the assessment. The adopted RBKC New Local Plan contains no changes of relevance to the air quality assessment.

• The LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 (2017)4 was superseded by the publication of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2025-20305 in December 2024 The new Air Quality Action Plan commits LBHF to meeting the WHO 2021 air quality guidelines by 2030 and states that “Mitigation shall be required at homes, schools, workplaces or

1 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

2 Secretary of State, 2023. Statutory Instrument 2023 No.96. The Environmental Targets (Fine Particulate Matter)(England) Regulations 2023

3 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan Review London. RBKC.

4 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, 2017. Air Quality Action plan 2018-2023. London. LBHF.

5 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, 2024. Air Quality Action Plan 2025-2030. London. LBHF.

other development if there are exceedances of the councils 2030 Annual Mean Air Quality Targets for N02 (10ug/m3 ), PM10 (15ug/m-3 ) and PM2.5 (5ug/m-3 ) where current and future predicted pollutant concentrations are within 5% of these limits” .

10.9 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid However, Environmental Agency (EA) guidance ‘Air Emissions Risk Assessment for your Environmental Permit6’ has been considered in this assessment and added to Technical Appendix 10A:1A: Legislation, Policy and Consultation.

10.10 In addition, while not UK guidance, Acute Exposure Guideline threshold levels (AEGLs) published by the Environment Protection Agency7 have been considered in respect of the emergency life safety back-up generators

Consultation

10.11 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

10.12 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of review comments and responses are provided in Technical Appendix 2A.10N in ES Volume 3A

10.13 RBKC, LBHF and Waterman post-submission review comments have required the following changes to the assessment:

• Clarification updates to national legislation, local guidance and topic specific guidance references have been made where necessary;

• Clarification updates have been made in respect of the assessment scope and method;

• To align with the objectives of the LBHF draft AQAP, the predicted annual mean impacts of the Early Phases assessment have been compared to the annual mean WHO Air Quality Guideline (AQO) Levels;

• Emergency life safety back-up generators have been modelled in accordance with EA Guidance to provide evidence that significant air quality effects are unlikely to arise;

• Predicted NO2 concentrations associated with emergency life safety back-up generators have been compared with AEGLs; and

• Mitigation requirements outlined in the Assessment of Residual Effects of the July 2024 ES Volume 1 have been reviewed considering the publication of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2025-2030

Assessment Scope

10.14 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However, clarification updates have been made in response to the post-submission review comments where necessary.

10.15 In respect of the technical scope, vehicle parking presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. It is confirmed, a maximum of 25 car club spaces would be provided in addition to the minimum 3 % disabled parking provision and would comprise on-plot and on-street spaces.

10.16 The temporal scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid However, the assessment of demolition and construction effects have been based on the amended information presented in Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description and updated time slices presented in Technical Appendix 5.1A, ES Volume 3A (which accounts for the removal of the Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue access point)

10.17 It has been confirmed that peak HGV movements for the Early Phases and All Phases is anticipated to still occur in 2028; however, the HGV peak at Beaumont Avenue is now anticipated to occur in 2039 (previously 2041).

6 Environmental Agency 2025. Air emissions risk assessment for your environmental permit. Available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/air-emissions-risk-assessment-for-yourenvironmental-permit (Accessed 08/07/2025)

7 United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA). Acute Exposure Guidance Levels for Airborne Chemicals. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/aegl (accessed 10 June 2025).

10.18 A quantitative assessment was undertaken to determine the risk to sensitive human receptors from once in a lifetime or rare short-term exposure to NO2 emissions associated with the emergency life safety back-up generators.

Baseline Characterisation Method

10.19 The baseline and future baseline characterisation Desk Study and Field Study methods presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

10.20 However, the assessment of baseline conditions has been updated with up-to-date information from the following sources:

• RBKC air quality monitoring data8;

• On-site monitoring data undertaken by Hoare Lea;

• Defra background maps9;

• APIS data10;

• Predicted existing and future baseline (results of updated dispersion modelling); and

• Predicted existing and future ecological site deposition rates (results of updated dispersion modelling)

10.21 Full details of amended modelling parameters and data are provided in Technical Appendix 10A:2A: Amended Assessment Methodology.

10.22 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

10.23 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

10.24 However, traffic emissions were calculated using the Emission Factors Toolkit (EFT) v12.0 for the July 2024 ES. The EFT has since been updated to v13.111. For this addendum, traffic emissions for operational and construction traffic scenarios have been calculated using EFT v13.1 which utilises nitrogen oxides (NOx), PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors from the European Environment Agency COPERT 5.8 emission tool. The predicted concentrations of roadside NOx were converted to roadside NO2 using the Local Air Quality Management conversion calculator12 which have also been updated since the July 2024 ES.

10.25 In addition, the assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description, in particular the following:

• Amended demolition and construction assumptions and traffic flow data provided by the Applicant’s construction advisor (T&T) and transport consultant (WSP);

• Amended completed development traffic flow data (considering updated trip generation calculations for servicing and deliveries trips as requested by TfL) provided by WSP;

• Up-to-date MOPAC emissions and operating profile data; and

• Life safety generator emission data

10.26 Quantitative modelling of the emergency life safety back-up generator emissions has been undertaken for an emergency scenario following EA Guidance

10.27 In respect of the MOPAC energy centre, ADMS 6 (version 6.0.0.1) dispersion modelling was used to predict NO2 concentrations from the energy centre. Predicted pollutant concentrations were combined with Defra background map concentrations to provide total NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations within the study area.

10.28 Full details of amended modelling parameters and data are provided in Technical Appendix 10A:2A: Amended Assessment Methodology.

Assessment Criteria

10.29 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

10.30 However, for the Early Phases site suitability assessment predicted pollutant concentrations were compared to the WHO AQG levels (interim WHO AQG Levels were referred to in the July 2024 ES).

10.31 For the operation of the emergency life safety back-up generators, EA Guidance has been used for the assessment criteria. This approach requires a statistical approach for assessing the likelihood of exceeding the short-term NO2 objective. This is discussed further in Appendix Technical Appendix 10:2A: Amended Assessment Methodology.

10.32 Predicted NO2 concentrations associated with emergency life safety back-up generators were compared with AEGLs which describe the human health effects from once in a lifetime, or rare exposure to airborne chemicals. The NO2 AEGLs are provided in Technical Appendix 10A:2A: Amended Assessment Methodology.

Receptor Sensitivity Criteria

Road Traffic Emissions

Human Health Air Quality Objectives

10.33 Considering the publication of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2025-2030, the predicted impacts of the Early Phases assessment has also been compared to the WHO Annual Mean AQG levels presented in Table 10.5 of the July 2024 ES. The assessment considered emissions from road traffic, the operation of the nearby MOPAC energy centre, as well as trains on the WLL. This remains unchanged from the July 2024 ES.

Life Safety Generators

10.34 Life safety generator 100th percentile of one hour mean NO2 concentrations were considered against AEGLs13 which describe the human health effects from once-in-a-lifetime, or rare, exposure to airborne chemicals (details are provided in Technical Appendices 10A:2A: Assessment Methodology) as requested by Waterman The generators would only be operated on monthly testing cycles and in an emergency scenario Accordingly, predicted impacts have not been assessed against WHO annual mean guidelines.

Impact Magnitude Criteria

Site Suitability

10.35 Predicted annual mean concentrations at future receptors during the Early Phases assessment have been compared against the relevant annual mean WHO AQG levels

Life Safety Generator Emissions

10.36 Although there is no specific regulatory guidance for modelling emissions from emergency life safety back-up generators, the EA Guidance methodology typically used for environmental permitting has been adopted for this assessment. This approach includes the use of a hypergeometric probability distribution test to estimate the likelihood of exceeding the hourly mean AQO, based on a defined number of generator hours per year. The 1 % probability of exceeding (indicating that exceedance is highly unlikely) was used as the benchmark to calculate the probability of exceeding the hourly mean AQO based on 72 hours of operation. In practice, life safety generators are expected to operate for significantly shorter durations, typically not exceeding 6 hours

10.37 To assess the potential impacts and associated likely effects of the life safety generators, the 5 years worse-case NO2 modelled concentration at sensitive receptors, known as process contribution (PC), were added to the background concentrations to obtain the process environmental contribution (PEC). The PEC was then compared with the relevant short term ambient Air Quality Standard (AQS) to assess the significance of the air quality effects associated with the

8 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. 2024 Annual Status Report

9 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2021. Background Mapping data for local authorities. Available at: https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/data/laqm-backgroundhome (accessed 10 June 2025)

10 Air Pollution Information System, 2025. Air Pollution Information System. Available at: www.apis.ac.uk (accessed 10 June 2025).

11 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2025. Emission Factor Toolkit v13.1.

12 Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2024. NOX to NO2 Calculator v9.1. Available at: https://laqm.defra.gov.uk/air-quality/air-quality-assessment/nox-to-no2calculator

13 United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA). Acute Exposure Guidance Levels for Airborne Chemicals. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/aegl (accessed 10 June 2025).

proposed development emissions. Impacts associated with life safety generators are short term as they will only be used in an emergency scenario therefore the PEC was not compared with the annual mean AQG Levels.

Assumptions and Limitations

10.38 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the following is noted:

• References to Technical Appendix 10.2 should now also include Technical Appendix 10A.2A.

• It has been assumed that back-up generators would be located at roof and basement levels

• It has been assumed that during an emergency scenario, the life safety generators will operate for 72 hours, in practice they may only operate for six hours, therefore predicted concentrations reported are conservative

Baseline Conditions

Existing Baseline

10.39 The existing baseline presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development but has been updated with the most up-to-date monitoring data

10.40 LBHF and RBKC operate both continuous automatic monitoring and passive diffusion tube monitoring of air quality at several locations within their respective boroughs. An updated summary of the closest and most representative monitoring locations for the Site are presented Table 10A.8R, including formatting corrections Complete sets of monitoring data for 2023 and 2024 is not currently available. As presented in the July 2024 ES, it is considered that 2022 monitored conditions are likely to be representative of long-term conditions going forward.

Table 10A 8R: Amended Measured NO2 Concentrations Site

Diffusion Tubes

Diffusion Tubes

Notes: Exceedances of annual mean objective highlighted in bold NO2 annual means of more than 60 μg/m3, indicating a potential exceedance of the NO2 1-hour mean NAQO objective are presented in bold and underlined

10.41 Updated results of NO2 automatic monitoring of the 1-hour mean NO2 concentrations are presented in Table 10A 9R

Table 10A.9A: Amended Measured NO2 Concentrations

10.42 The data presented in Table 10A.8R and Table 10A.9A suggest an overall decrease in NO2 concentrations between 2016 and 2023 at diffusion tubes and automatic monitoring sites in the study area. However, Table 10A 8R shows the annual mean NO2 National Air Quality Objective (NAQO) continued to be exceeded at roadside monitoring locations, KC33 in 2023 and HF46 in 2022.

10.43 Table 10A 9A shows the 1-hour mean NO2 NAQO has not been exceeded at KC5 since 2018. Table 10A 8R also indicates that the 1-hour mean NO2 NAQO is unlikely to have been exceeded at any of the monitoring locations in the study area since 2019 as annual mean concentrations have been below 60 µg/m3

10.44 Updated results of PM10 monitoring in the study area are presented in Table 10A 10R which indicates the annual mean and 24-hour mean PM10 NAQOs were not exceeded at KC5 between 2016 and 2024

Table 10A 10R: Amended Measured PM10 Concentrations

KC5 19 18 4 13 10 6 10 5 -

Objective 50 µg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 35 days per year

10.45 There is no PM2.5 monitoring undertaken at the monitoring locations within the study area. However, the LBHF ASR shows there were no exceedances of the PM2.5 NAQO at monitoring sites outside the study area between 2016 and 2022 and the RBKC ASR shows there were no exceedances of the PM2.5 NAQO at monitoring sites outside the study area between 2018 and 2023

On-Site Monitoring

10.46 An ongoing air quality monitoring survey has been undertaken across the southern portion of the Site by the Applicant’s sustainability consultant (Hoare Lea) since 27 July 2022. Earthsense zephyr monitoring equipment are deployed at five locations to monitor NO2, PM10, PM2.5 and ozone (O3)

10.47 The up-to-date results of the on-site monitoring of the annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 from 2022 to 2024 are presented in Table 10A.11R

Table 10A.11R: Amended Annual Mean Air Pollutant Concentrations On-Site (µg/m3)

10.48 Table 10A.11R shows the NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations observed across the southern portion of the Site have been well below the annual mean NAQOs. This is consistent with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

Background Maps

10.49 Table 10A.12R presents the updated NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 background concentrations at the Site for 2022. Whilst the background concentration year of 2022 remains as presented in the July 2024 ES, the concentration values are amended due to an update to annual mean background concentration produced by Defra.

Table 10A.12R: Amended Defra Annual Mean Background Concentrations 2022 (µg/m3)

Assessment of Baseline Data

10.57 The amended baseline data is consistent with the conclusions of the July 2024 ES except for the following additional comments:

• Updated monitoring results continue to show an overall decrease in annual mean NO2 concentrations between 2016 and 2024 at monitoring sites in the study area;

• On-site monitoring undertaken from 2022 to 2024 confirms that the annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 NAQOs have been met on-site; and

• Modelling results indicate that the annual mean

and

at most existing receptor locations for PM10 and all receptor locations for

Future Baseline

Background Maps

and

10.58 Table 10A.14A presents the updated NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 background concentrations at the Site for 2030

Table 10A.14A: Amended Defra Annual Mean Background Concentrations 2030 (µg/m3)

10.50 Table 10A.12R shows that updated predicted background concentrations are below the NAQOs at the Site.

Predicted Existing Baseline

10.51 The updated predicted concentrations at modelled existing sensitive receptors (see Figure 10A 1N and Table 10A.15A) in the existing 2022 baseline are presented in Technical Appendix 10A:2A: Amended Assessment Methodology

10.52 The annual mean NO2 NAQO would have been exceeded at two receptors in 2022 (HF11 and KC3) which are located along the A4 West Cromwell Road. The NO2 WHO AQG level would have been exceeded at all receptor locations.

10.53 Table 10A.3A.3A shows the annual mean PM10 and PM2.5 NAQO would not have been exceeded at any of the modelled sensitive receptors in 2022. The annual mean PM10 and PM2.5 WHO AQG levels would have been exceeded at most receptor locations for PM10 and all receptor locations for PM2.5

10.54 Table 10A.3A.3A also indicates that the 1-hour mean NO2 and 24-hour mean PM10 NAQOs would not have been exceeded at any of the modelled receptors in 2022 as annual mean NO2 did not exceed 60 µg/m3 and annual mean PM10 did not exceed 32 µg/m3. This is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

Ecological Site Deposition Rates

10.55 The updated Defra background annual mean concentrations of NOx and the updated APIS three-year average (20192021) nitrogen and acid deposition rates for the ecological site assessed in this chapter are presented in Table 10A.13A

Table 10A.13A: Amended Baseline NOx and Nitrogen Deposition Rates

Brompton Cemetery and WLL (SINC)

Level/Load

Notes: Exceedances highlighted in bold

Neutral Grassland

10.56 Baseline NOx concentrations would have exceeded the critical level (and NAQO) of 30 µg/m3 at Brompton Cemetery SINC and WLL SINC in 2022. The nitrogen deposition and nitrogen acid deposition critical load would also have been exceeded at Brompton Cemetery SINC and WLL SINC This is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

10.59 Table 10A.14A shows background concentrations decrease from 2022 to 2030 and continue to be well below the annual mean NAQOs and is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES

Sensitive Receptors

Existing Receptors

10.60 The existing sensitive human and ecological receptors set out in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development However additional human receptors have been considered as detailed below and as shown in Figure 10A.3N

10.61 An additional existing sensitive receptor (HF16) has been considered as the amended traffic data indicates that it would receive relevant exposure to long- and short-term pollutant concentrations from road traffic associated with the Amended Proposed Development

10.62 Seven additional existing sensitive receptors (HF17b, HF18b, HF19b, KC12b, KC13b, KC14b and KC15b) have been considered as they would be affected by emissions from the emergency life safety back-up generators due to proximity to these emission sources.

10.63 The eight additional existing receptors identified as sensitive to the Amended Proposed Development, and which have been scoped into the assessment are presented in Figure 10A.1N (Note that Figures 10A.1N, 2N and 3N fully replaces Figure 10.3 of the July 2024 ES). and summarised in Table 10A.15A

10A.1N: Amended Existing Human Health Sensitive Receptors

10.64 Existing human health receptors were modelled at 1.5 m and 4.5 m high to represent exposure at Ground Floor (‘GF’) and first floor levels.

Table 10A.15A: Amended Summary of Existing Sensitive Human Health Receptors

Table 10A.15A: Amended Summary of Existing Sensitive Human Health Receptors

Future Receptors

10.65 Future on-site receptor locations and or heights have been amended, and additional receptors have been considered for the emergency life safety back-up generator assessment as detailed below.

10.66 To assess Site suitability, receptors were chosen to reflect locations where future Site users would have relevant exposure to long- and short-term pollutant concentrations. Future receptors were modelled on-site at building façades and particular attention has been paid to assessing Site suitability close to emission sources including the road network, the WLL, the MOPAC energy centre and the emergency life safety back-up generators

10.67 Future on-site human health receptors were modelled at 1,053 locations/heights. Future receptors were modelled at the same or slightly amended locations (to reflect the Amended Proposed Development height and massing) considered in the July 2024. Receptors were modelled at a height of 1.5 m to represent ground floor level, and at each storey level of the Detailed Component Development Plots where AQOs are applicable. Updated future sensitive receptor locations, revised since the July 2024 ES, are presented in Figure 10A.2N and Table 10A.17A

10A.2N: Future Human Health Sensitive Receptors

Figure

Figure

Table 10A 17A: Amended Summary of Future Sensitive Receptors

Early Phases

Notes:* Ranges in height show minimum and maximum heights of receptors modelled.

Life Safety Generator Assessment

10.68 Where life safety generators are installed the emission points have been located on the roof of the tallest building within the plot on which they are located. To assess the impact of on-site emergency life safety back-up generator emissions future receptors were modelled at 4.5 m to represent the first-floor level and at 7.5 m to represent the second-floor level, and at the top five floors on every building within the plot based on the maximum AOD height as presented in Table 10A.2A.1N in Technical Appendix 10A:2A: Assessment Methodology and presented in Figure 10A.3N. For detailed development plans for the early phases, impacts were predicted at every floor level as shown in Table 10A.17A

Predicted Future Baseline

10.69 The updated predicted concentrations at each receptor for the 2031 and 2041 future baselines are presented in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results, as Early Phases and All Phases completed development stage Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 respectively. The updated predicted concentrations continue to indicate the NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 long- and short-term NAQOs would be met at all modelled sensitive receptor locations in 2031 and 2041 (see Figure 10A.2N). However, the annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 WHO AQG levels would be exceeded at most receptor locations for PM10 and all receptor locations for NO2 and PM2.5

Assessment of Effects

10.70 The following proposed amendments are relevant to the assessment:

• Detailed Component:

Amendment of Plot layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations14 and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

Introduction of additional balconies at levels 01 and 02 and a terrace at level 07 at Plot EC05;

De minimus height increase at Plots EC05 and EC06;

Minor changes to the proposed GEA floorspace for each proposed building.

• Outline Component

Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

Development Zone F (Plot EC03) maximum building height reduction from 71.3 mAOD to 67.8 mAOD (3.5 m);

Development Zone X (Plot WK02) massing setback to the north (23.2 mAOD by 0.5 m; 28.1 mAOD by 4.5 m; 31.4 mAOD by 3.6 m);

Amendment of land use parameter plans to provide clarity within each Development Zone, to improve alignment with Development Specification, to add Hotel use within Development Zone K, to allow for ancillary floorspace within Development Zones;

Amendment of assumed minimum and maximum land use areas;

Removal of operational Site access points into and through the Site, in particular the removal of vehicular access from Mund street/Aisgill Avenue with the exception of emergency access and addition of potential pedestrian and cycle accesses from A4 West Cromwell Road and from the Site to Cluny Mews; and Removal of demolition and construction Site access point from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Dust and Amenity

10.71 The demolition and construction dust and amenity effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of potential impacts.

Road Traffic Emissions

Human Health Receptors

10.72 The amended predicted air pollutant concentrations at existing human health receptors with and without both the Early Phases peak demolition and construction traffic and early completed development traffic are presented in full in Table 10A 2A 13A to Table 10A 2A 14A in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results

Figure 10A 3N: Emergency Life Safety Back-Up Generator Future Human Health Sensitive Receptors

10.73 The amended assessment findings are in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES with predicted annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 without and with both the Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development traffic below the annual mean NAQO at each sensitive receptor including the additional HF16 receptor. Short-term NO2 and PM10 concentrations are unlikely to be exceeded.

10.74 Impacts on annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive receptors continue to be negligible adverse at most receptors and negligible beneficial at a few receptors as presented in the July 2024 ES. Slight and moderate adverse impacts (for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5) are predicted at the same receptors HF1_FF and HF1_GF respectively as reported in the July 2024 ES

10.75 Given the limited spatial extent of slight adverse and moderate adverse impacts, the change in NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive human health receptors due to Early Phases demolition and construction stage traffic is likely to be temporary, short- to medium-term, direct, adverse Not Significant This is consistent with the conclusion of the July 2024 ES.

10.76 The annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 with both the Early Phases demolition and construction traffic and early completed Early Phases development traffic are predicted to exceed the WHO AQG Levels (outlined in Table R10.5) at all receptors for NO2 and PM2.5, and at most receptors for PM10. However, as presented in 10A.3A.4R to Table 10A.3A.6R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results, the Early Phases peak demolition construction traffic is expected to have a small contribution to concentrations predicted at sensitive receptors compared to existing baseline concentrations (background values). Exceedances of the WHO targets at all these locations can primarily be attributed to baseline concentrations which exceed WHO AQG levels without the Early Phases (i.e. WHO targets are already exceeded at these locations in the baseline without the Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development traffic).

Ecological Receptors

10.77 The results of the amended predicted annual mean NOx concentrations at ecological receptors in Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A 3A 7R in Technical Appendix 10A 3A: Amended Model Results

10.78 The amended assessment findings are consistent with the findings of the July 2024 ES with high future baseline NOx concentrations resulting in the NOx critical level being exceeded at Brompton Cemetery at receptor BC_0 located 4.2 m from the roadside. However, exceedances are not predicted to occur beyond BC_10 located 14.2 m from the roadside (exceedances were predicted up to 154.2 m in the July 2024 ES). This is likely to be associated with updated Defra background values which are lower than those used in the July 2024 ES.

10.79 The results of the predicted annual mean nitrogen deposition at Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A.8R in Technical Appendix 10A.3A: Amended Model Results The change in nitrogen deposition at BC_0 (4.2 m from the roadside) is 6.65 % relative to the critical load (more than 1 % of the critical load) Following DMRB Guidance, the change in nitrogen deposition at BC_0 is considered potentially significant as the increase in nitrogen deposition is more than 0.4 kgN/ha/yr (0.69 kgN/ha/yr). However, the change in nitrogen deposition beyond BC_10 located 14.2 m from the roadside would be less than 1 % of the critical load and therefore would be ‘not significant’.

10.80 The results of the predicted annual mean acid deposition at ecological receptors in Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A.9R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results The change in acid deposition at BC_0 (4.2 m from the roadside) is 1.0 % relative to the critical load and therefore would be not significant .

10.81 The change in NOx concentrations and deposition due to the Early Phases demolition and construction stage is shortto medium-term, direct, adverse Not Significant This is consistent with the conclusion of the July 2024 ES.

Site Suitability

10.82 The results of the amended dispersion modelling at future receptors during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage are presented in full in Table 10A.3A.10R: in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results. The annual mean concentrations presented include emissions from Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development road traffic, WLL, the MOPAC energy centre and background concentrations.

10.83 The amended assessment findings are consistent with the findings of the July 2024 ES with predicted annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 below the annual mean NAQO at all future onsite receptors. Short- term NO2 and PM10 concentrations are unlikely to be exceeded.

10.84 The MOPAC energy centre maximum short-term NO2 impacts are predicted to occur at receptor WB05_03B at a height of 12 m; however, these would not exceed the NAQO (Table 10A.3A.10R: in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results).

10.85 Considering all concentrations would be below the long- and short-term NAQOs, the Early Phases Site is considered acceptable for the proposed uses during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage. This is consistent with the conclusion of the July 2024 ES.

10.86 The annual mean NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 are predicted to exceed the WHO AQG Levels and PM10 concentrations are predicted to be close to or exceeding the WHO AQG Levels all future on-site receptors. Exceedances of the WHO AQG Levels can primarily be attributed to future baseline concentrations which exceed WHO targets without the Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development traffic.

Completed Development Effects

Emergency Generator Emissions

Human Health Receptors

10.87 Current space provision has been made for 42 hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) fuelled life safety generator across the Early Phases Testing of each generator would be limited to 30 minutes per month with a maximum of five generators being tested at one time. During an emergency scenario (power outage and or fire) the generators would be likely to operate for up to six hours as power companies have to respond to power outages within several hours and sprinkler pumps are unlikely to operate for more than six hours. However, the assessment of the emergency life safety back-up generator emissions was undertaken for an emergency scenario with all the generators operating at the same time for up 72 hours (to provide a conservative assessment).

10.88 The results of dispersion modelling at future receptors during the Early Phases completed development stage are presented in full in Table 10A.3A 3N in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results Annual mean NO2 impacts have been calculated based on 72 hours of continuous emergency operation, and an assessment undertaken to determine the probability of exceeding the NO2 hourly mean NAQO (based on the 1% probability of exceeding the objective).

10.89 Dispersion modelling results indicate that based on 72 hours of operation there is no probability (0 %) of exceeding the hourly NO2 objective at all assessed future on-site and off-site sensitive receptor locations The PEC which includes the PC from the emergency life safety back-up generators and MOPAC plus the background concentrations are below the NO2 annual mean NAQO.

10.90 The emergency life safety back-up generator 100%ile hourly mean NO2 PC concentrations are below the AEGL-1 60minute value at all future on-site and off-site sensitive receptor locations. The maximum predicted concentration across the model grid is above AEGL 1 value but below AEGL 2. This occurs at Plot EC16 at a height of 50.6 m AOD

10.91 Accordingly, the effect on NO2, concentrations at sensitive human health receptors due to emergency life safety backup generator emissions for the Early Phases is permanent, long-term, direct, adverse and Not Significant. This is consistent with the conclusions of the qualitative assessment of the July 2024 ES which stated that significant effects would not be likely to occur.

Road Traffic Emissions

Human Health Receptors

10.92 The amended predicted air pollutant concentrations at existing human health receptors with and without the Early Phases completed development flows are presented in full in Table 10A.3A 11R to Table 10A.3A.13R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results

10.93 The amended assessment findings are consistent with the findings of the July 2024 ES with predicted annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 without and with both the Early Phases completed development traffic below the annual mean NAQO at each sensitive receptor. Short-term NO2 and PM10 concentrations are unlikely to be exceeded.

10.94 Impacts on annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive receptors continue to be negligible adverse or negligible beneficial (for NO2 and PM10) at all receptors.

10.95 The effect on NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive human health receptors due to Early Phases completed development traffic is permanent, long-term, direct, adverse Not Significant This is consistent with the conclusion of the July 2024 ES

10.96 The annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 with the Early Phases completed development traffic are predicted to exceed the WHO AQG Levels (outlined in Table R10.5) at all receptors for NO2 and PM2.5, and most receptors for PM10. However, as presented in Table 10A.3A.11R to Table 10A.3A.13R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results, the Early Phases completed development traffic is expected to have a small contribution to concentrations predicted at sensitive receptors. Exceedances of the WHO targets at all these locations can primarily be attributed to baseline concentrations which exceed WHO AQG levels without the Early Phases (i.e. WHO targets are already exceeded at these locations in the baseline without the Early Phases completed development traffic).

Ecological Receptors

10.97 The results of the amended predicted annual mean NOx concentrations at ecological receptors in Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A.14R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results.

10.98 The amended assessment findings are consistent with the findings of the July 2024 ES with high future baseline NOx concentrations resulting in the NOx critical level being exceeded at Brompton Cemetery at receptor BC_0 located 4.2 m from the roadside. However, exceedances are not predicted to occur beyond BC_10 located 14.2 m from the roadside (exceedances were predicted up to 124.2 m in the July 2024 ES). This is likely to be associated with updated Defra background values which are lower than those used in the July 2024 ES

10.99 The results of the predicted annual mean nitrogen deposition at Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A 15R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results. The change in nitrogen deposition at BC_0 (4.2 m from the roadside) is 3.9 % relative to the critical load (more than 1 % of the critical load). Following DMRB Guidance, the change in nitrogen deposition at BC_0 is considered potentially significant as the increase in nitrogen deposition more than 0.4 kgN/ha/yr (0.69 kgN/ha/yr). However, the change in nitrogen deposition beyond BC_10 located 14.2 m from the roadside would be less than 1 % of the critical load and therefore would be ‘not significant’.

10.100 The results of the predicted annual mean acid deposition at ecological receptors in Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A 16R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results. The change in acid deposition at BC_0 (4.2 m from the roadside) is less than 1.0 % relative to the critical load and therefore would be ‘not significant’.

10.101 The change in NOx concentrations and deposition due to Early Phases is considered permanent, long-term, direct, adverse Not Significant. This consistent with the conclusions of the July 2024 ES.

Site Suitability

10.102 The amended results of the dispersion modelling at future receptors as a result of MOPAC energy centre emissions during the Early Phases completed development stage remain the same as those described in the Early Phases demolition and construction stage Site suitability assessment.

10.103 The amended results of the dispersion modelling at future receptors and impact of traffic generated during the Early Phases completed development stage are presented in full in 10A.3A.17R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Model Results.

10.104 The amended assessment findings are consistent with the findings of the July 2024 ES with predicted annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 below the annual mean NAQO at all future on-site receptors. Short-term NO2 and PM10 concentrations are unlikely to be exceeded.

10.105 Considering all concentrations would be below the annual mean NAQO, the Early Phases Site is considered acceptable for the proposed uses during the Early Phases completed development stage. This is consistent with the conclusion of the July 2024 ES.

10.106 The annual mean NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2031 are predicted to exceed the WHO AQG and PM10 concentrations are predicted to be close to or exceeding the WHO AQG Levels all future on-site receptors. Exceedances of the WHO AQG Levels can primarily be attributed to future baseline concentrations which exceed WHO targets without the Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development traffic.

Air Quality Neutral

10.107 The air quality neutral assessment set out in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Dust and Amenity

10.108 The demolition and construction dust and amenity effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of potential impacts.

Road Traffic Emissions

Human Health Receptors

10.109 The assessment of All Phases demolition and construction stage road traffic emissions on human health receptors remains as described in the amended Early Phases demolition and construction stage assessment of effects. This is because the peak demolition and construction stage vehicle movements are predicted to occur in 2028.

Ecological Receptors

10.110 The assessment of All Phases demolition and construction stage road traffic emissions on ecological receptors remains as described in the amended Early Phases demolition and construction stage assessment of effects. This is because the peak demolition and construction stage vehicle movements are predicted to occur in 2028 during the Early Phases.

Site Suitability

10.111 The Site suitability assessment for the All Phases during the demolition and constructions stage remains as described for the amended Site suitability assessment for the Early Phases demolition and constructions stage. This is because the peak demolition and construction stage vehicle movements are predicted to occur in 2028.

Completed Development Effects

Emergency Generator Emissions

Human Health Receptors

10.112 Current space provision has been made for 61 hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) fuelled life safety generator across the All Phases. Testing of each generator would be limited to 30 minutes per month with a maximum of five generators being tested at one time. During an emergency scenario (power outage and or fire) the generators would be likely to operate forup to six hours as power companies have time to respond to power outages within several hours and sprinkler pumps are unlikely to operate for more than 6 hours. However, the assessment of life safety generator emissions was undertaken for an emergency scenario with all the generators operating at the same time for up 72 hours (to provide a conservative assessment).

10.113 The results of dispersion modelling at future receptors during the All Phases completed development stage are presented in full in Table 10A.3A.3N in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Model Results. Annual mean NO2 impacts have been calculated based on 72 hours of continuous emergency operation, and an assessment undertaken to determine the probability of exceeding the NO2 hourly mean NAQO (based on the 1% probability of exceeding the objective).

10.114 Dispersion modelling results indicate that based on 72 hours of operation there is no probability (0%) of exceeding the hourly NO2 objective at all assessed future onsite and offsite sensitive receptor locations. The predicted environmental concentration (PEC) which includes the process contributions (PC) from the life safety generators and MOPAC plus the background concentrations are below the NO2 annual mean NAQO.

10.115 The life safety generator 100%ile hourly mean NO2 PC concentrations from the emergency life safety back-up generators are below the AEGL-1 60-minute value at all future on-site and off-site sensitive receptor locations. The maximum predicted concentration across the model grid is above AEGL 1 but below AEGL 2. This occurs at Plot EC16 at a height of 50.6m (AOD).

10.116 Accordingly, the effect on NO2, concentrations at sensitive human health receptors due to emergency generator emissions for the All Phases is permanent, long-term, direct, adverse and Not Significant. This is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

Road Traffic Emissions

Human Health Receptors

10.117 The amended predicted air pollutant concentrations at existing human health receptors with and without the All Phases completed development flows are presented in full in Table 10A A3.18R to Table10A A3.20R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Model Results

10.118 The amended assessment findings are in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES with predicted annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2041 without and with both the All Phases completed development traffic below the annual mean NAQO at each sensitive receptor including the additional HF16 receptor Short-term NO2 and PM10 concentrations are unlikely to be exceeded.

10.119 Impacts on annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive receptors continue to be negligible adverse at most receptors and negligible beneficial at a few receptors. Slight adverse impacts (for PM10 and PM2.5) are predicted at the same receptors HF1_GF as reported in the July 2024 ES.

10.120 Given the limited spatial extent of slight adverse impacts, the change in NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at sensitive human health receptors due to the All phases completed development traffic is permanent, long-term, direct, adverse Not Significant. This is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

10.121 The annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2041 with the All Phases completed development traffic are predicted to exceed the WHO AQG Levels at all receptors for NO2 and PM2.5, and at most receptors for PM10. However, as presented in Table 10A.A3.18R to Table 10A.A3.20R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results, the All Phases completed development traffic is expected to have a small contribution to concentrations predicted at sensitive receptors. Exceedances of the WHO targets at all these locations can primarily be attributed to baseline concentrations which exceed WHO AQG levels without the All Phases (i.e. WHO targets are already exceeded at these locations in the baseline without the All Phases completed development traffic.).

Ecological Receptors

10.122 The results of the amended predicted annual mean NOx concentrations at ecological receptors in Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A.21R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results.

10.123 The amended assessment findings are in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES with high future baseline NOx concentrations resulting in the NOx critical level being exceeded at Brompton Cemetery at receptor BC_0 located 4.2 m from the roadside. However, exceedances are not predicted to occur beyond BC_10 located 14.2 m from the roadside (exceedances were predicted up to 124.2 m in the July 2024 ES). This is likely to be associated with updated Defra background values which are lower than those used in the July 2024 ES.

10.124 The results of the predicted annual mean nitrogen deposition at Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A.22R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results. The change in nitrogen deposition at BC_0 (4.2 m from the roadside) is 1.3% relative to the critical load (more than 1 % of the critical load). Following DMRB Guidance, the change in nitrogen deposition at BC_0 is considered potentially significant as the increase in nitrogen deposition more than 0.4 kgN/ha/yr (0.69 kgN/ha/yr). However, the change in nitrogen deposition beyond BC_10 located 14.2 m from the roadside would be less than 1 % of the critical load and therefore would be ‘not significant’.

10.125 The results of the predicted annual mean acid deposition at ecological receptors in Brompton Cemetery SINC are presented in Table 10A.3A.23R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results. The change in acid deposition at BC_0 (4.2 m from the roadside) is less than 1.0 % relative to the critical load and therefore would be ‘not significant’.

10.126 Considering the limited spatial extent of potentially adverse nitrogen deposition effects, the change in NOx concentrations, nitrogen deposition and acid deposition due to the All Phases completed development traffic is considered permanent, long-term, direct, adverse Not Significant. This is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

Site Suitability

10.127 The amended results of the dispersion modelling at future receptors as a result of MOPAC energy centre emissions during the All Phases completed development stage remain the same as those described in the amended Early Phases demolition and construction stage Site suitability assessment.

10.128 The amended results of the dispersion modelling at future receptors and impact of traffic generated during the All Phases completed development stage are presented in full in Table 10A.3A.24R in Technical Appendix 10A:3A: Amended Model Results.

10.129 The amended assessment findings are in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES with predicted annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2041 below the annual mean NAQO at all future onsite receptors. Short-term NO2 and PM10 concentrations are unlikely to be exceeded.

10.130 Considering all concentrations would be below the annual mean NAQO, the Early Phases Site is considered acceptable for the proposed uses during the All Phases completed development stage. This is in line with the findings of the July 2024 ES.

10.131 The annual mean NO2 concentrations in 2041 are predicted to be close to or exceeding the WHO AQG, PM10 concentrations are predicted to be close to WHO AQG Levels, and PM2.5 concentrations are predicted to exceed WHO AQG Levels at all future onsite receptors. Exceedances of the WHO AQG Levels can primarily be attributed to future baseline concentrations which exceed WHO targets without the All Phases demolition and construction and completed development traffic.

Air Quality Neutral

10.132 The air quality neutral assessment set out in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

Additional Mitigation

Demolition and Construction Stage

10.133 Consistent with the July 2024 ES, the Early Phases demolition and construction stage is not predicted to have a significant adverse effect on existing receptors

10.134 The Early Phases is considered suitable for the development type proposed, with predicted NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations well within the NAQOs at future receptors introduced by the Early Phases

10.135 However, annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future onsite receptors. Therefore, to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030, mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the completed development, at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance.

Completed Development Stage

10.136 No significant adverse effects have been predicted at existing receptors.

10.137 The Early Phases is considered suitable for the development type proposed, with predicted NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations well within the NAQOs at future receptors introduced by the Early Phases

10.138 However, annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future onsite receptors. Therefore , to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the operational phases of the completed development, for at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance.

Enhancement Measures

10.139 No enhancement measures are proposed in respect of air quality, consistent with the July 2024 ES.

All Phases

Additional Mitigation

Demolition and Construction Stage

10.140 Consistent with the July 2024 ES, the All Phases demolition and construction stage is not predicted to have a significant adverse effect on existing receptors

10.141 The All Phases is considered suitable for the development type proposed, with predicted NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations well within the NAQOs at future receptors introduced by the All Phases.

10.142 However, annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future onsite receptors. Therefore, to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the completed development, at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance

Completed Development Stage

10.143 Consistent with the July 2024 ES, the All Phases completed development stage is not predicted to have significant adverse effects on existing receptors.

10.144 The All Phases is considered suitable for the development type proposed, with predicted NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations well within the NAQOs at future receptors introduced by the All Phases.

10.145 However, annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future onsite receptors. Therefore to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the completed development, at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance.

Enhancement Measures

10.146 No enhancement measures are proposed in respect of air quality, consistent with the July 2024 ES.

Demolition and Construction Stage Residual

Effects

10.147 The conclusions as presented in the Assessment of Effects section remains valid for the residual effects.

Completed Development Stage Residual Effects

10.148 The conclusions as presented in the Assessment of Effects section remains valid for the residual effects.

Summary of Residual Effects

10.149 The summary of residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development as the assessment conclusions have not changed.

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

10.150 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are presented in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects.

Inter-Project Effects

10.151 The inter-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, as outlined in ES Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the Mund Street School site scheme, as presented in Table 10A.18A

Table 10A.18A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Air Quality Effects

No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason

Early

Phases

18 Mund Street School Site No

All Phases

18 Mund Street School Site No

Based on professional judgement and experience, the cumulative scheme is anticipated to employ similar dust mitigation techniques as the Early Phases.

Demolition and construction traffic from the cumulative schemes would be managed through a CEMP to avoid, reduce and mitigate impacts.

No The proposed development is only likely to include parking facilities for blue badge holders, consistent with prevailing policy and guidance. It is unlikely that vehicle emissions associated with the scheme would be significant. Pollutant concentrations are unlikely to impact on-site receptors.

Based on professional judgement and experience, the cumulative scheme is anticipated to employ similar dust mitigation techniques as the Early Phases.

Demolition and construction traffic from the cumulative schemes would be managed through a CEMP to avoid, reduce and mitigate impacts.

No The proposed development is only likely to include parking facilities for blue badge holders, consistent with prevailing policy and guidance. It is unlikely that vehicle emissions associated with the scheme would be significant. Pollutant concentrations are unlikely to impact on-site receptors.

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

10.152 The Early Phases demolition and construction and completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes presented in the July 2024 ES for Early Phases remain valid The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

10.153 The Early Phases completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes presented in the July 2024 ES for All Phases remain valid The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

10.154 The All Phases demolition and construction and completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes presented in the July 2024 ES for Early Phases remain valid The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

10.155 The All Phases completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes presented in the July 2024 ES for All Phases remains valid The Mund Street School site scheme would not alter the conclusions.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

10.156 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required clarification updates to the assessment, detailed quantitative assessment of emergency life safety back-up generators, as well as consideration of WHO Air Quality Guideline Levels for the Early Phases.

10.157 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, the assessment considered the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building massing, footprint and balconies of the Amended Detailed Component; the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component; as well as the floorspace area schedules of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components.

10.158 In respect of baseline conditions, the most up-to-date monitoring data was used in the modelling exercise.

10.159 The assessment has concluded that effects on NO2, concentrations at sensitive human health receptors due to emergency life safety back-up generator emissions for all scenarios would be adverse, but not to a significant scale This is consistent with the qualitative findings of the July 2024 ES.

10.160 The assessment has concluded that mitigation for air quality effects based on the national air quality objectives are not required for the Amended Proposed Development. However to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030, mitigation can be secured by condition in accordance with this guidance.

10.161 The assessments have concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of likely air quality effects.

10.162 Consideration of a potential cumulative scheme at the Mund Street School site has concluded that no inter-project cumulative effects are likely to arise on the basis that standard practice mitigation measures (CEMP) are adopted and secured.

10.163 No additional new or different significant effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development

11A NOISE AND VIBRATION

Introduction

11.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely noise and vibration effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the noise and vibration assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building massing, footprint and balconies of the Amended Detailed Component; the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component; as well as the floorspace area schedules of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components..

11.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration and Volume 3, Technical Appendices 11.1-11.6 of the July 2024 ES These documents have been updated where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

11.3 This chapter is supported by the following amended technical appendices in Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Technical Appendix 11A.1A: Amended Legislation, Policy, Guidance and Consultations;

• Technical Appendix 11A.4A: Amended Construction Stage Information;

• Technical Appendix 11A.5A: Amended Operational Stage Information; and

• Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Amended Noise and Vibration Site Suitability Assessment.

11.4 All other technical appendices of the July 2024 ES, remain valid.

11.5 The introductory text presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid.

Methodology

11.6 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the noise and vibration assessment.

11.7 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

11.8 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking assessment. The adopted RBKC New Local Plan contains no material changes of relevance to the noise and vibration assessment.

11.9 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, BS ISO 9613-2:20243 ‘Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: Engineering method for the prediction of sound pressure levels outdoors’ (2024) has been published. This standard supersedes BS ISO 9613-2:19964 (1996), a methodology which was implemented in the sound propagation modelling for the July 2024 ES.

11.10 All other topic specific guidance and industry standards presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

11.11 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

11.12 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2.10N in ES Volume 3A.

11.13 The post-application submission review comments have not required changes to the assessment.

Assessment Scope

11.14 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However, in terms of technical scope, additional consideration has been given to the following in respect of the completed development stage:

• Effects due to noise from site-wide building services, mechanical and electrical plant; and

• Effects due to operational noise associated with proposed B8 use (such as from logistics vehicle movements, loading, etc.), should this use class be developed.

11.15 The amended site suitability assessment for the Amended Proposed Development is presented in Technical Appendix 11A.6A, ES Volume 3.

11.16 The temporal scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. However, the assessment of demolition and construction effects is based on the updated information presented in Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description and updated time slices presented in Technical Appendix 5.1A, ES Volume 3A (which accounts for the removal of the Mund Street/Aisgilll Avenue access point)

11.17 It has been confirmed that peak HGV movements for the Early Phases and All Phases is anticipated to still occur in 2028; however, the HGV peak at Beaumont Avenue is now anticipated to occur in 2039 (previously 2041).

Baseline Characterisation Method

11.18 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

11.19 The existing baseline noise and vibration environment at the Site and respective study areas were characterised through noise and vibration surveys undertaken in 2021 and 2024. The findings of these surveys are considered to remain valid, and baseline conditions at the Site are considered to have remained the same as observed during these surveys

11.20 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

11.21 The assessment methods presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the assessments presented in this addendum are based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description, in particular the following:

• Amended demolition and construction assumptions as presented in Technical Appendix 11A.4A;

1 Secretary of State for

3

2024. British

BS ISO 9613-2:2024 ‘Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors. Part 2: Engineering method for the prediction of sound pressure levels outdoors’. BSI.

• Amended demolition and construction assumptions and traffic flow data provided by the Applicant’s construction advisor (Turner & Townsend) and transport consultant (WSP); 4

• Amended completed development traffic flow data (considering updated trip generation calculations for servicing and deliveries trips as requested by TfL) provided by WSP as presented in Technical Appendices 11A.4A and 11A.5A;

• Additional completed development land use assumptions for the Outline Component to include additional potential locations and sources of noise presented in Technical Appendix 11A.5A; and

• Additional completed development land use assessment for other flexible uses in the Outline Component.

11.22 The Amended Proposed Development has been taken into consideration in the modelling exercise and assessment of each noise aspect. The 3D sound propagation model of the Proposed Development was updated to account for the Amended Proposed Development.

11.23 Sound propagation modelling was carried out using CadnaA® version 2025, which implements a revised noise prediction methodology (in ISO 9613 Part 2:2024) to that detailed in the July 2024 ES (ISO 9613 Part 2:1996). The model was used to establish whether the predicted impacts during the demolition and construction and completed development stages for the Amended Proposed Development differ from that presented in the July 2024 ES.

11.24 Given the flexibility of the Outline Component, it is not possible to predict the level of building services and operational noise from the Amended Proposed Development for all uses. Accordingly, limits have been established and apply to the first phase of development.

11.25 In accordance with standard practice, further assessment of completed development building services and operational noise would be carried out for each phase of the Amended Proposed Development in compliance with appropriately worded planning conditions.

11.26 Sound of this nature would be assessed in accordance with BS 4142:2014+A1:2019 (BS 4142), which involves a comparison of the expected rating level of building services and operational noise with the representative background sound levels measured at each NSR. The requirement of the local authorities would then be to limit to the expected rating level such that it is at least 10 dB below the existing background sound level at the existing NSRs

11.27 The assessment method for the cumulative stage remains valid. However, a qualitative assessment of the Mund Street School site scheme and the Empress State Building (ESB) scheme has been undertaken, as presented in the Cumulative Effects section of this addendum

Assessment Criteria

11.28 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Assumptions and Limitations

11.29 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following amended or new assumptions and limitations:

11.30 The amended assumptions built into the sound propagation model of the Site, the Early Phases and the All Phases, and the various sources of noise, where these vary from the July 2024 ES, are described below. Supplementary information regarding these updated assumptions has been provided within ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendix 11A.4A and 11A.5A

Demolition and Construction Stage Assessment Assumptions

11.31 Amended assumptions and limitations for the demolition and construction stage, where these differ from those within the July 2024 ES and accompanying technical appendices, are presented in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendix 11A.4A. These are limited to noise source positioning, removal of the Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue access point and updates to traffic data for the demolition and construction stage

Completed Development Stage Assessment Assumptions

11.32 Outline Component land use parameter plans have been amended in order to make it clearer which uses particularly in flexible plots are predominant uses in line with the Development Specification and subject to a number of minor limited amendments. This was a change requested by the local planning authority. The Development Specification Land Use Tables show the proposed amendments are limited, as described in Chapter 4A

11.33 In relation to commercial activity noise, the July 2024 ES stated the assumed location of the most significant sources of commercial activity noise (Appendix 11.5 Figure 11.5.4), determined from Proposed Ground Floor Land Use parameter plans (Cultural Use, or Leisure or Sui Generis/Culture Use) and detailed floors plans for the Detailed Component. There is no change in proposed maximum floor area for each use class for the Outline Component Development Zones identified within this figure, or for the maximum cumulative floor area for Leisure or Community / Social Infrastructure use. Therefore, the assumed locations of the most significant sources of commercial activity noise remain valid.

11.34 In relation to building services noise, the July 2024 ES stated assumptions regarding the type and positioning of building services plant, based on the one predominant use shown in the submitted Proposed Upper Levels Land Use parameter plans. These assumptions have been updated in order to account for some proposed use classes which could include building services and operational noise sources that are not at roof level, including noise from outdoor vehicle movements. Accordingly, the following amended assumptions have been applied:

• Building services and operational noise limits would apply in line with expected conditions to be attached to any planning permission granted (in line with LPA guidance). These conditions would be applied to the first phase of the Amended Proposed Development.

• Further noise limits for the later phases would be defined as and when these phases progress, determined against baseline noise monitoring results and through consultation with the LPAs

• In accordance with standard practice, further assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out at the detailed design stage for each phase of the Amended Proposed Development.

• Where required, additional mitigation (such as relocation of noise-generating activities or plant, attenuation packages, enclosures, acoustic screening, etc.) would be developed to achieve compliance with the building services and operational noise limits.

• Compliance with LPA noise guidance would be secured by means of an appropriately worded planning condition, as is common practice.

11.35 Amended assumptions and limitations for the completed development stage are presented in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendix 11A.5A These are limited to noise modelling, removal of Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue access points and updates to traffic data for the completed development stage.

Baseline Conditions Existing Baseline

11.36 While it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, the planning application was accompanied by a noise impact assessment, demonstrating minimal impacts on adjacent receptors, and these uses were permitted subject to planning conditions including noise control and operating hours. As such, the meanwhile use does not have any material influence on the baseline noise conditions at nearby receptor groups

11.37 The baseline conditions presented in the July 2024 ES are therefore considered to remain materially valid in respect of noise and vibration.

Future Baseline

11.38 For the assessment of changes in traffic noise during the demolition and construction stage and the completed development stage, amended traffic information of the 2031 and 2041 future years has been used to model the predicted future noise climate.

Sensitive Receptors

11.39 The receptor groupings as presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. However, the assumed type and sensitivity of proposed on-site receptors within the Outline Component have been amended as shown in Table 11A.13A

Table 11A.13A: Amended Existing and Future Noise and Vibration Sensitive Receptors Summary

Ref. Receptor Grouping LPA Type Sensitivity Receptors within both Early Phases and All Phases Assessments (Existing and Proposed)

DZ B Outline component: Development Zone B (assumed occupied from 2034)

DZ J Outline component: Development Zone J (assumed occupied from 2030)

DZ P Outline component: Development Zone P (assumed occupied from 2030)

DZ S Outline component: Development Zone S (assumed occupied from 2037)

RBKC and LBHF Commercial Medium

RBKC Community facility Medium

LBHF Leisure/Health use Medium

RBKC Commercial Medium

11.40 Sensitive receptors that could be introduced as a result of the additional Mund Street School site cumulative scheme have been assessed qualitatively in the inter-project cumulative assessment

Assessment of Effects

11.41 This section presents the additional or different impacts and effects of the Amended Proposed Development, where the assessment identifies a worsening in impact. In relation to noise, a worsening in impact is defined as an increase in predicted impact of 2 dB or more, since a change of 1 dB is considered to be within the margin of uncertainty of the noise predictions methods applied in the assessment. A worsening in effect is defined as where the scale of the effect experienced by a receptor group is worse than that presented in the July 2024 ES (such as a change from a minor adverse effect to a moderate adverse effect).

11.42 The amended or different impacts and effects of the Amended Proposed Development showing a betterment or lessening in impact are not reported, unless the change is sufficient to result in a previously significant effect being classed as not significant.

11.43 The following proposed amendments are relevant to the assessment:

• Detailed Component:

Amendment of Plot layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations5 and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

Introduction of additional balconies at levels 01 and 02 and a terrace at level 07 at Plot EC05; De minimus height increase at Plots EC05 and EC06; Minor changes to the proposed GEA floorspace for each proposed building.

• Outline Component

Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

Development Zone F (Plot EC03) maximum building height reduction from 71.3 mAOD to 67.8 mAOD (3.5 m);

Development Zone X (Plot WK02) massing setback to the north (23.2 mAOD by 0.5 m; 28.1 mAOD by 4.5 m; 31.4 mAOD by 3.6 m);

Amendment of and use parameter plans to provide clarity within each Development Zone, to improve alignment with Development Specification, to add Hotel use within Development Zone K, to allow for ancillary floorspace within Development Zones;

Amendment of assumed minimum and maximum land use areas;

Removal of operational Site access points into and through the Site, in particular the removal of vehicular access from Mund street/Aisgill Avenue with the exception of emergency access and addition of potential pedestrian and cycle accesses from A4 West Cromwell Road and from the Site to Cluny Mews; and Removal of demolition and construction Site access point from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue

11.44 As detailed in paragraph 11.10, the amendment to international standard ISO 9613 is also relevant to the assessment, since this updated sound propagation calculation method has been applied. The updated method includes a different method of determining barrier attenuation values, dB Dz (the attenuating effect, in decibels, of screening objects between the sound source position and listening position). In some circumstances, such as where the path length difference6 is small, the updated method results in lower barrier attenuation values (and therefore greater impacts at the receptor).

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Demolition and Construction Activity Noise

11.45 By reference to Tables 11.14 and 11.15 of the July 2024 ES, the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development would result in the following amended or different demolition and construction activity noise impacts:

• Receptor R17: during 2034 to 2036 an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL and are low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid

• Receptors R30 and R31: during 2033 to 2036 an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are below the LOAEL and are negligible in impact magnitude. No additional adverse significant effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid.

• Proposed receptor EC06: during 2031 and 2034 to 2036 an increase of up to 3 dB. These impacts are above the SOAEL. The impact magnitude remains the same as presented in the July 2024 ES with the exception of 2034 which increases from medium to high impact magnitude The overall effect of medium-term Major Adverse as reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

• Proposed receptor WB04: during 2032 and 2034 to 2036 an increase of up to 5 dB. These impacts are equal to the SOAEL in 2035 to 2036. The impact magnitude remains the same as presented in the July 2024 ES with the exception of 2034 which increases from medium to high impact magnitude. The overall effect of short-term Moderate Adverse as reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid

• Proposed receptor WB05: during 2033 to 2036 an increase of up to 3 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL in these years and are low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid

• Proposed receptor Development Zone N (WB06): during 2033 to 2036 an increase of up to 4 dB. These impacts are above the SOAEL and medium in impact magnitude. The overall effect of short-term Moderate Adverse effects as reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

11.46 All other demolition and construction activity noise impacts remain the same, or no worse than, the impacts presented in the July 2024 ES for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases development scenario.

11.47 In summary, no additional significant adverse effects are expected as a result of demolition and construction activity noise from the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases when compared with the July 2024 ES reported effects

Demolition and Construction Activity Vibration

11.48 The level of vibration from compaction and vibratory piling at nominal distance bands were presented in Table 11.16 of the July 2024 ES and remain valid and representative of the demolition and construction activities likely to result in the highest levels of vibration.

6 Path length difference, metres, is defined in Equation 22 and Figure 9 of ISO 9613-2:2014 as the difference between the shortest path length between source and receiver and the path length between source and receiver that accounts for intervening diffracting edges such as roof edges.

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration

11.49 Demolition and construction activity vibration impacts of the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases have been determined accounting for any differences in distance between vibration source and receptor group versus that presented in the July 2024 ES.

11.50 For all receptors, the demolition and construction activity vibration magnitude of impact remains the same, or no worse than presented in the July 2024 ES for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases.

11.51 It is noted that moderate adverse vibration effects were expected at receptor groups R53 and R55 due to substructure works at Development Zone A (EC22); however, this was erroneously omitted from Table 11.17 of the July 2024 ES. These vibration effects remain the same for the Amended Proposed Development.

11.52 With the exception of the above omission, no additional significant adverse effects are expected as a result of demolition and construction activity vibration from the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Road Traffic Noise

11.53 The expected changes in road traffic noise during the demolition and construction stage are presented in Figure 11A.4R

11.54 Figure 11A.4R demonstrates that, within the study area, the greatest change in road traffic noise on any single road during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage would be +6.2 dB (a high magnitude of impact). This noise change is expected to occur along Empress Place (the proposed access road from Lillie Road) when road traffic noise from this road is considered in isolation.

11.55 It is noted that the closest facades of the NSRs near Empress Place – R04 and R06 (16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers), 2 Empress Place, 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers)) – would also be affected by road traffic noise from Lillie Road.

11.56 Considering the total road traffic noise level (which accounts for noise from multiple roads near to the receptor), demolition and construction traffic would result in a change in total road traffic noise level of +3.3 dB at the mid-point of the nearest NSR facades to Empress Place. The magnitude of impact would be medium, and this would result in temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) at the closest receptors within receptor groups R04 and R06. For receptors beyond 15 m from the kerb of Empress Place, the change in total road traffic noise level

would be less than 3.0 dB and therefore would result in temporary, short-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant).

11.57 In addition, a low adverse magnitude of impact is expected along the roads highlighted in yellow in Figure 11A.4R, including sections of the A3218 Lillie Road (with an expected change in road traffic noise of +1.3 dB). This road traffic noise change would result in temporary, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant) at NSRs within the vicinity of this road.

11.58 The magnitude of impact at receptors adjacent to all other roads within the study area is expected to be negligible adverse and this would result in temporary, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse effects (not significant) at these NSRs.

11.59 The change in road traffic during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage is not expected to result in a change in road traffic noise of 1 dB LA10,18hour or more at any receptors located within any Noise Important Area. While road traffic noise emissions from Lillie Road (east section) within Noise Importance Area 807 (junction of North End Road and Lillie Road) are expected to increase by 1.3 dB, the total noise level at receptors near the junction is not expected to increase by 1 dB or more since these receptors are also affected by noise from North End Road and the west section of Lillie Road for which road traffic noise emissions would increase by a lesser amount (0.3 to 0.5 dB).

11.60 Given the above, additional significant adverse effects have been identified at receptor groups closest to Empress Place (R04 and R06) due to the change in road traffic noise that would occur during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage. All other demolition and construction traffic noise effects remain the same, or no worse than, the effects presented in the July 2024 ES for the Early Phases development scenario.

Completed Development Effects

Completed Development Road Traffic Noise

11.61 The worst-case expected changes in road traffic noise at the completed development stage are presented in Figure 11A.5R

Figure 11A.4R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Road Traffic Noise Level Change

Figure 11A.5R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Road Traffic Noise Level Change

11.62 Figure 11A.5R demonstrates that, within the study area, the greatest change in road traffic noise on any single road during the completed development stage would be +5.8 dB (high magnitude of impact). This is expected to occur along Empress Place (the proposed access road from Lillie Road)when road traffic noise from this road is considered in isolation.

11.63 It is noted that the closest facades of the NSRs near the Empress Place – R04 and R06 (16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers), 2 Empress Place, 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers)) – would also be affected by road traffic noise from Lillie Road.

11.64 Considering the total road traffic noise level (which accounts for noise from multiple roads near to the receptor), demolition and construction traffic would result in a change in total road traffic noise level of +3.0 dB at the mid-point of the nearest NSR facades to Empress Place. The magnitude of impact would be medium and this would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) at the closest receptors within receptor groups R04 and R06. For receptors beyond 12 m from the kerb of Empress Place, the change in total road traffic noise level would be less than 3.0 dB and therefore would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant).

11.65 In addition, a low adverse magnitude of impact is expected along the roads highlighted in yellow in Figure 11A.5R, including sections of the A3218 Lillie Road east of the Site (with an expected change in road traffic noise of +1.0 to +1.5 dB). This road traffic noise change would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant) at NSRs within the vicinity of this road.

11.66 The change in road traffic noise at the completed development stage is not expected to result in a change in road traffic noise of 1 dB LA10,18hour or more within any Noise Important Area.

11.67 The predicted level of road traffic noise from proposed internal access roads that would be experienced in existing residential external amenity areas would not exceed 50 dB LAeq,16hour nor the LOAEL.

11.68 Given the above, additional significant adverse effects have been identified at receptors closest to Empress Place (R04 and R06) due to the change in road traffic noise that would occur during the Early Phases completed development stage. All other completed development road traffic noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES for the Early Phases development scenario remain valid (same or no worse than).

Completed Development Building Services and Operational Noise

11.69 As noted within the Assessment Method section, the assumptions applied for the assessment of building services and operational noise have been updated. At this stage of the planning process, it is not possible to predict or quantitatively assess completed development building services and operational noise from the entire Amended Proposed Development Early Phases

11.70 Both LPAs have published guidance relating to building services and operational noise. This guidance states that the expected rating level of building services and operational noise (from the entire Amended Proposed Development) shall be at least 10 dB below the existing background sound level at the existing NSRs.

11.71 It is noted that individual existing NSRs, if positioned close to the boundary between two development phases could be equally affected by building services and operational noise from up to two phases. For this reason, building services and operational noise limits applicable to Phase 1 have been reduced by 3 dB. This is to leave an allowance for additional building services and operational noise from an adjacent phase. Once both phases are operational, it is expected that the LPAs requirement would still be achieved at all NSRs.

R09, R11, R12, R15, R16

R47, R48, R49, R50

11.72 Building services and operational noise limits for Phase 1 of the Early Phases have been developed on this basis and are presented in Table 11A.1N Table 11A.1N: Phase One Completed Development

R02, R06, R07

R41, R43, R45

R29

R04, R05, R51, R52, R53, R54, R55

R33

*These noise limits apply until such time as alternative requirements are agreed in writing with both local authorities. Noise limits are defined as rating levels in accordance with BS 4142:2014+A1:2019 and shall include penalties, where appropriate, to account for the expected character of building services and operational noise at the receptor.

11.73 The noise limits presented in Table 11A.3N are relatively stringent for LBHF receptors near Aisgill Avenue (west of the Detailed Component buildings), for RBKC receptors in Philbeach Gardens (north of the Detailed Component buildings) and RBKC receptors in Eardley Crescent (east of the Detailed Component buildings). Given the likelihood of significant effects from building services and operational noise associated with the completed development, additional mitigation has been considered as part of the assessment. This additional mitigation and the resulting residual effects are presented in the Assessment of Residual Effects section.

11.74 The building services and operational noise impacts and effects on proposed on-site NSRs are evaluated within Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Amended Site Suitability Assessment.

Completed Development Commercial Activity Noise

11.75 By reference to Table 11.20 of the July 2024 ES, the updated assessment of commercial activity noise from the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development results in the following amended or different impacts presented below.

Venue doors open:

• Receptor R17: impacts expected to be medium in magnitude (1 dB above the existing background sound level) for the Amended Proposed Development (previously low). This has the potential to result in additional significant effects should all community spaces operate with doors open.

• Receptors R18, R21, R37, R38 and NR09: impacts are expected to be low in magnitude for the Amended Proposed Development (previously negligible). No additional significant effects are expected at these receptors.

• Receptors R05 and R15: A reduced magnitude of impact is expected (from high to medium).

• Receptor R12: A reduced magnitude of impact is expected (from medium to low).

Venue doors closed / with embedded mitigation:

• Receptors R12, R47, R50: impacts expected to be low in magnitude for the Amended Proposed Development (previously negligible). No additional significant effects are expected at these receptors.

• Receptor R17: A reduced magnitude of impact is expected (from low to negligible).

11.76 With the assumed implementation of embedded mitigation as set out within the Assumptions and Limitations section of the July 2024 ES, commercial activity noise levels at existing receptors would be a low or negligible magnitude of impact. On the basis that the assumed embedded mitigation is implemented and enforced, commercial activity noise from the Early Phases is expected to result in permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant) at 14 existing high sensitivity residential receptor groupings and permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse effects (not significant) at all other existing high sensitivity residential receptor groups within the study area.

11.77 In summary, with embedded mitigation, no additional significant effects are expected as a result of commercial activity noise from the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases when compared with the July 2024 ES reported effects

11.78 The amended commercial activity noise impacts and effects on proposed on-site NSRs are evaluated within Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Site Suitability Assessment.

Site Suitability for Noise and Vibration

11.79 The assessment of the suitability of the Site for residential development has been updated to account for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases. This assessment is presented within Technical Appendix 11A.6A

11.80 The impacts and effects on proposed Early Phases sensitive receptors remain the same, or no worse than, the impacts and effects presented in the July 2024 ES (and associated Technical Appendix 11.6) for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

11.81 Accordingly, subject to the mitigation measures and assumptions used within the assessment being secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions, the Early Phases Site is deemed suitable for residential use.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Demolition and Construction Activity Noise

11.82 By reference to Tables 11.21 and 11.22 of the July 2024 ES, the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development would result in the following amended or different demolition and construction activity noise impacts:

• Receptor R16 and R18: during 2034 an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL and are low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid.

• Receptor R25 and proposed receptors EC16 and E17: during 2034 to 2036 and during night-works an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL and are low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid.

• Receptors R31, NR04 and NR05 and proposed receptor EC04: during 2034 an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL and are negligible or low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid.

• Receptor NR08: during 2040 to 2043 and the late night works an increase of 3 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL and are negligible or low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid.

• Proposed receptor EC06: during 2031 an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are above the SOAEL; however, the impact magnitude remains the same (medium) The overall scale and duration of effect of medium-term, Major Adverse as reported in July 2024 remains valid.

• Proposed receptor WB04: during 2032 to 2043 and during the night-works an increase of up to 3 dB. These impacts are above the SOAEL in 2033 and 2035 to 2036. The impact magnitude remains the same with the exception of 2035 and 2036 which increases from low to medium The overall scale and duration of effect of short-term, Moderate Adverse as reported in July 2024 remains valid.

• Proposed EC08: during 2038 to 2039 an increase of 2 dB. These impacts are below the SOAEL and are negligible or low in impact magnitude. No additional significant adverse effects are expected and therefore the July 2024 reported effects remain valid.

• Proposed receptor EC18: during 2038 to 2043 and the late night works an increase of up to 4 dB. The daytime impacts are below the SOAEL and low in impact magnitude. The night-time impacts are above the SOAEL and medium in impact magnitude The overall scale and duration of effect of short-term, Moderate Adverse as reported in July 2024 remains valid.

11.83 All other demolition and construction activity noise impacts remain the same, or no worse than, the impacts presented in the July 2024 ES for the Amended Proposed Development All Phases development scenario.

11.84 In summary, no additional adverse effects are expected as a result of demolition and construction activity noise from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases when compared with the July 2024 ES reported effects

Demolition and Construction Activity Vibration

11.85 As with the Early Phases, the level of vibration from compaction and vibratory piling at nominal distance bands was presented in Table 11.16 of the July 2024 ES and remain valid and representative of the demolition and construction activities likely to result in the highest levels of vibration.

11.86 Demolition and construction activity vibration impacts of the Amended Proposed Development All Phases have been determined accounting for any differences in distance between vibration source and receptor group versus that presented in the July 2024 ES.

11.87 For all receptors, the demolition and construction activity vibration magnitude of impact remains the same, or no worse than presented in the July 2024 ES for the Amended Proposed Development All Phases.

11.88 It is noted that moderate adverse vibration effects were expected at receptor groups R53 and R55 due to substructure works at Development Zone A (EC22); however, this was erroneously omitted from Table 11.23 of the July 2024 ES. These vibration effects remain the same for the Amended Proposed Development.

11.89 With the exception of the above, no additional significant adverse effects are expected as a result of demolition and construction activity vibration from the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Road Traffic Noise

11.90 The expected changes in road traffic noise during the demolition and construction stage are identical to that presented for the Early Phases and are presented within Figure 11A 1 In summary:

• for the closest dwellings to the Empress place (in receptor groups R04 and R06): temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) at the closest receptors; and

• for all other receptors: no worse than temporary, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant).

11.91 As noted in the Assessment Scope section, a further sensitivity analysis has been carried out in relation to demolition and construction traffic noise at receptors near Beaumont Avenue, based on the following traffic information:

• Future baseline including cumulative schemes (2031):

Traffic flow for Beaumont Avenue of 484 vehicles including 38 HDVs.

• Future baseline including cumulative schemes (2041) + Proposed Development (All Phases) Demolition and Construction Traffic (worst-case):

Future baseline including cumulative schemes (2041) + Proposed Development (All Phases) traffic flow of 3,109 vehicles including 604 HDVs; plus

Demolition and Construction Traffic (2041 Beaumont Avenue Peak): traffic flow of 158 vehicles including 82 HDVs; giving

Total traffic flow Beaumont Avenue of 3,267 vehicles including 686 HDVs.

11.92 Basic noise levels predicted for Beaumont Avenue and the resulting change and impact magnitude are as follows:

• Future baseline including cumulative schemes (2031): 55 0 dB LA10,18hour;

• Future baseline including cumulative schemes (2041) + Proposed Development (All Phases) Demolition and Construction Traffic (worst-case): 66 3 dB LA10,18hour;

• Change in road traffic noise level: +11.3 dB LA10,18hour (a high magnitude of impact) when road traffic noise from this road is considered in isolation.

11.93 It is noted that closest façade of sensitive receptors to Beaumont Avenue – R20 to R22 and NR06 (which include 1 to 55 Kensington Hall Gardens, 86 to 98 North End Road (even numbers), 179 to 203a North End Road (odd numbers)) –would also be affected by road traffic noise from West Cromwell Road and North End Road.

11.94 Considering the total road traffic noise level (which accounts for noise from multiple roads near to the receptor), demolition and construction traffic would result in a change in total road traffic noise level of +3 7 dB at the nearest NSRs to Beaumont Avenue. The magnitude of impact would be medium and this would result in temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant).

11.95 As with the Early Phases, the change in road traffic noise during the demolition and construction stage is not expected to result in a change in road traffic noise of 1 dB LA10,18hour or more at any receptors within any Noise Important Area.

11.96 Given the above, additional significant adverse effects have been identified at receptor groups closest to Empress Place (R04 and R06) and Beaumont Avenue (R20 to R22 and NR06) due to the change in road traffic noise that would occur during the All Phases demolition and construction stage. All other demolition and construction traffic noise effects remain the same, or no worse than, the effects presented in the July 2024 ES for the All Phases development scenario.

Completed Development Effects

Completed Development Road Traffic Noise

11.97 The expected changes in road traffic noise at the completed development stage are presented in Figure 11A 6R

11.98 Figure 11A.6R demonstrates that, within the study area and within 1 km of the Site boundary, the greatest change in road traffic noise on any single road at the completed development stage would be +10.7 dB (high magnitude of impact). This is expected to occur along Beaumont Avenue when road traffic noise from this road is considered in isolation, due to the forecast increase in traffic flow along this road

11.99 It is noted that closest façade of sensitive receptors to Beaumont Avenue – R20 to R22 and NSR06 (which include 1 to 55 Kensington Hall Gardens, 86 to 98 North End Road (even numbers), 171 to 203a North End Road (odd numbers)) –would also be affected by road traffic noise from West Cromwell Road and North End Road. The contribution of noise from West Cromwell Road at each NSR would be greater than the contribution of noise from Beaumont Road since, although West Cromwell Road is further from the NSR, it carries a much higher traffic volume. In addition, the All Phases would introduce screening between the receptors and West Cromwell Road in the form of the proposed building massing.

11.100 Considering the tota road traffic noise level (which accounts for noise from multiple roads near to the receptor), completed development traffic would result in a change in total road traffic noise level of less than +3.0 dB at the nearest NSR to the Beaumont Avenue. The magnitude of impact would be low, and this would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant).

11.101 A change in road traffic noise at the completed development stage of +5.9 dB (high magnitude of impact) is expected to occur along Empress Place (the proposed access road from Lillie Road) when road traffic noise from this road is considered in isolation.

11.102 It is noted that the closest facades of the NSRs near Empress Place – R04 and R06 (16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers), 2 Empress Place, 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers)) – would also be affected by road traffic noise from Lillie Road.

11.103 Considering the total road traffic noise level (which accounts for noise from multiple roads near to the receptor), completed development traffic would result in a change in total road traffic noise level of +3.1 dB at the mid-point of the nearest NSR facades to Empress Place The magnitude of impact would be medium, and this would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) at the closest receptors within receptor groups R04 and R06. For receptors beyond 14 m from the kerb of Empress Place, the change in total road traffic noise level would be less than 3.0 dB and therefore would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant).

11.104 A change in road traffic noise at the completed development stage of +5.0 dB (high magnitude of impact) is expected to occur along Hogarth Road (increase) and Earls Court Gardens (decrease) when road traffic noise from these roads is considered in isolation. These changes occur due to the expected redistribution of traffic in the area as a result of the completed development All Phases scenario. The adverse impacts would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Major Adverse effects (significant) at high sensitivity receptors directly adjacent to Hogarth Road. The beneficial impacts would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Major Beneficial effects (significant) at high sensitivity receptors directly adjacent to Earls Court Gardens.

11.105 In addition, a low adverse magnitude of impact along is expected along the roads highlighted in yellow in Figure 11A.6R, including sections of the A3218 Lillie Road (with an expected change in road traffic noise of +1.2 to +1.7 dB). This road traffic noise change would result in temporary, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant) at NSRs within the vicinity of this road.

11.106 The change in road traffic noise at completed development stage is not expected to result in a change in road traffic noise of 1 dB LA10,18hour or more at any receptors located within any Noise Important Area. While road traffic noise emissions from Lillie Road (east section) within Noise Importance Area 807 (junction of North End Road and Lillie Road) are expected to increase by 1.2 dB, the total noise level at receptors near the junction is not expected to increase by 1 dB or more since these receptors are also affected by noise from North End Road and the west section of Lillie Road for which road traffic noise emissions would increase by a lesser amount (0.2 to 0.6 dB).

11.107 Assuming the existing boundary fences at Gibbs Green Close are retained (or replaced like-for-like), the predicted level of road traffic noise from proposed internal access roads that would be experienced in existing residential external amenity areas would not exceed 50 dB LAeq,16hour nor the LOAEL.

11.108 Given the above, additional significant effects have been identified at receptors closest to Empress Place, Hogarth Road, and Earls Court Gardens, due to the change in road traffic noise that would occur during the All Phases completed development stage. All other completed development traffic noise impacts remain the same, or no worse than, the impacts presented in the July 2024 ES for the All Phases development scenario.

Figure 11A.6R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Road Traffic Noise Change

Completed Development Building Services and Operational Noise

11.109 As noted within the Assessment Method section, the assumptions applied for the assessment of building services and operational noise assessment have been updated At this stage of the planning process, it is not possible to predict or quantitatively assess completed development building services and operational noise from the entire Amended Proposed Development All Phases

11.110 Building services and operational noise limits for Phase 1 of the All Phases have been developed on the same basis as the Early Phases and are presented in Table 11A.1N.

11.111 As with the Early Phases, the noise limits are relatively stringent for LBHF receptors near Aisgill Avenue (west of the Detailed Component buildings), for RBKC receptors in Philbeach Gardens (north of the Detailed Component buildings) and RBKC receptors in Eardley Crescent Given the likelihood significant effects from building services and operational noise associated with the completed development, additional mitigation has been considered as part of the assessment. This additional mitigation and the resulting residual effects are presented in the Assessment of Residual Effects section.

11.112 The building services and operational noise impacts and effects on proposed on-site NSRs are evaluated within Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Amended Site Suitability Assessment

Completed Development Commercial Activity Noise

11.113 By reference to Table 11.26 of the July 2024 ES, the updated assessment of commercial activity noise from the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development results in in the following amended or different impacts presented below.

Venue doors open:

• Receptors R37, R38 and NR09: impacts are expected to be low in magnitude for the Amended Proposed Development (previously negligible). No additional significant effects are expected at these receptors.

• Receptor R05: a reduction in magnitude of impact is expected (from high to medium)

• Receptor R12: a reduction in magnitude of impact is expected (from medium to low).

Venue doors closed / with embedded mitigation:

• Receptor R10: impacts are expected to be medium in magnitude (1 dB above the existing background sound level) for the Amended Proposed Development (previously low). This has the potential to result in additional significant effects should all community spaces operate simultaneously and is discussed further below It is noted that this change in impact magnitude is primarily due to the application of the ISO 9613:2014 methodology since the proposed commercial activity noise assumptions remain the same as for the July 2024 ES.

• Receptors R06, R15, R47, R50: impacts are expected to be low in magnitude for the Amended Proposed Development (previously negligible). No additional significant effects are expected at these receptors.

11.114 Commercial activity noise impacts at receptor R10 are primarily due to noise from the assumed uses at Outline Component Development Zones I and P. The embedded mitigation for commercial activity noise (July 2024 ES para 11.205) requires further assessment of noise at the RMA stage, accounting for details which are not known at this stage (such as the location of external doors, and the expected sound insulation properties of the proposed building). Given that the updated assessment, with worst-case assumptions for the above Outline Component Development Zones, results in a marginal exceedance of the existing background sound level, it is considered that the embedded mitigation measures remain sufficient for avoiding significant effects.

11.115 With the assumed implementation of embedded mitigation set out within the Assumptions and Limitations section of the 2024 July ES, commercial activity noise from the All Phases is expected to result in permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant) at 15 existing high sensitivity residential receptor groupings and permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse effects (not significant) at all other existing high sensitivity residential receptor groups within the study area.

11.116 In summary, with embedded mitigation, no additional adverse effects are expected as a result of commercial activity noise from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases when compared with the July 2024 ES reported effects

11.117 The amended commercial activity noise impacts and effects on proposed on-site NSRs are evaluated within Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Site Suitability Assessment.

Completed Development Proposed RRV Facility Noise

11.118 By reference to Table 11.27 of the July 2024 ES, the updated assessment of RRV facility noise from the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development would result in the following amended or different impacts:

Daytime:

• Receptor R18: impacts are expected to be high in magnitude (8 dB above the existing background sound level, RRV facility noise level of 50 dB LAeq,1hour and rating level of 56 dB LAr,Tr) for the Amended Proposed Development (previously low). This has the potential to result in different or additional significant effects and is discussed further below It is noted that this change in impact magnitude is primarily due to the application of the ISO 9613:2014 methodology since the proposed RRV facility remains in the same location as assumed for the July 2024 ES.

• Receptor R17: impacts are expected to be medium in magnitude (1 dB above the existing background sound level) for the Amended Proposed Development (previously low). This has the potential to result in different or additional significant effects and is discussed further below

• Receptors R16 and R27: impacts are expected to be low in magnitude for the Amended Proposed Development (previously negligible). No additional significant effects are expected at these receptors.

Night-time:

• Receptors R18, R27 and R28: impact increase of 1 to 3 dB; however, the impacts are expected to remain low in magnitude No additional significant effects are expected at these receptors.

11.119 As stated within the July 2024 ES, the proposed RRV facility is expected to be sporadically and infrequently used with the expected impacts not occurring on a regular basis.

11.120 At receptors R17 and R18, the predicted RRV facility noise level would be the same as (or less than) the baseline ambient sound level for the evening, as determined from the closest monitoring location (approx. 50 dB LAeq,1hr). Where these receptor building has windows partially open for ventilation, this would result in an indoor noise level of no more than 35 to 40 dB LAeq,1hour during RRV activity.

11.121 The assessment indicates that noise from RRV activity during the daytime may be noticeable at receptors R17 and R18 and may cause small changes in behaviour (such as residents closing windows during RRV operations). However, even with windows open, the expected indoor noise level is not considered to be sufficient to interfere with tasks requiring concentration or to interfere with speech communication.

11.122 With the assumed implementation of embedded mitigation set out within the Assumptions and Limitations section of the 2024 July ES, further assessment of noise from the proposed RRV facility would be required at the RMA stage. This assessment would account for details which are not known at this stage (such as the location of external doors, and the expected sound insulation properties of the proposed building). It is considered that the embedded mitigation measures remain sufficient for avoiding significant effects.

11.123 With the assumed implementation of embedded mitigation set out within the Assumptions and Limitations section of the 2024 July ES, RRV facility noise from the All Phases is expected to result in daytime permanent, long-term, direct, Minor Adverse effects (not significant) at the worst-affected receptors (R17 and R18).

11.124 In summary, with embedded mitigation, no additional adverse effects are expected as a result of proposed RRV facility noise from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases when compared with the July 2024 ES reported effects

11.125 The amended/additional proposed RRV facility noise impacts and effects on proposed on-site NSRs are evaluated within Technical Appendix 11A.6A: Site Suitability Assessment.

Noise and Vibration Site Suitability

11.126 The assessment of the suitability of the Site for residential development has been updated to account for the Amended Proposed Development All Phases. This assessment is presented within Technical Appendix 11A.6A

11.127 The impacts and effects on proposed All Phases sensitive receptors remain the same, or no worse than, the impacts and effects presented in the July 2024 ES (and associated Technical Appendix 11.6) for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.128 Accordingly, subject to the mitigation measures and assumptions used within the assessment being secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions, the All Phases Site is deemed suitable for residential use.

Additional Mitigation and Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

Additional Mitigation

Demolition and Construction Stage

11.129 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.130 No additional mitigation is considered feasible with respect to demolition and construction traffic accessing the Site via the Empress Place

Completed Development Stage

11.131 No additional mitigation is considered feasible with respect to completed development traffic accessing the Site via Empress Place

11.132 The additional mitigation for completed development building services noise in terms of maximum sound power limits per roof plant area, as presented in the July 2024 ES, is no longer valid.

11.133 Based on the new assessment presented in this addendum, in order to reduce the likelihood of completed development building services and operational noise resulting in significant effects at the nearest existing and proposed receptors, the following additional mitigation would be required:

• For Phase 1, an assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed on-site. This assessment would demonstrate that the noise limits presented in Table 11A.3N (or alternative suitable noise limits if these are agreed separately with the LPAs) are not exceeded at all receptors. The assessment would provide details of the noise control measures to be installed for the phase.

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out prior to each phase being implemented and submitted at the RMA stage. This assessment would comprise the following:

Baseline noise monitoring at the NSRs most likely to be affected by each phase (considered appropriate given the long timeline before all of the Early Phases are completed, to account for any changes in background sound that occur as result of other development on-site and within the study area);

Definition of appropriate building services and operational noise limits using the results of theabove monitoring and through consultation with the LPAs;

Assessment of noise from all proposed building services and operational noise sources within the phase; and Definition of appropriate mitigation such that the limits defined for that phase are not exceeded at all NSRs.

11.134 Compliance with the assessments detailed above could then be demonstrated through commissioning noise monitoring at completion of each phase.

11.135 The above additional mitigation would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions

11.136 No additional mitigation for commercial activity noise was presented in the July 2024 ES and this remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Enhancement Measures

11.137 No enhancement measures are proposed in respect of noise and vibration consistent with the July 2024 ES conclusions

Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Demolition and Construction Activity Noise

11.138 The residual demolition and construction activity noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Activity Vibration

11.139 As demonstrated in this addendum, the residual effects of demolition and construction activity vibration presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.140 However, an additional potentially significant vibration effect was identified in the July 2024 assessment but was omitted from reporting (at receptor groups R53 and R55 due to substructure works at Development Zone A). The additional mitigation set out in the July 2024 ES states controls on activities causing vibration comprises the requirement for these works to occur during the daytime only, for prior notification to be given to residents and for a building condition survey to be undertaken if vibration from the works is expected to exceed the SOAEL. This mitigation would also be applicable to the Development Zone A works and receptor groups R53 and R55. With this mitigation, vibration from compaction or vibratory piling activity is expected to result in temporary, short or medium-term, direct, Minor Adverse residual effects (Not significant) at these receptors.

11.141 Therefore, no additional significant residual effects are expected as a result of demolition and construction activity vibration from the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Road Noise Traffic

11.142 As demonstrated in this addendum, as no additional mitigation is considered feasible, additional temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) are expected within receptor groups R04 and R06 (within 15 m of the Empress Place kerb).

11.143 For all other receptor groups, the residual demolition and construction road traffic noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Completed Development Residual Effects

Completed Development Road Traffic Noise

11.144 As demonstrated in this addendum, the residual completed development road traffic noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of additional permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) effects at the closest receptors within receptor groups R04 and R06 (within 12 m of the Empress Place kerb)

Completed Development Building Services and Operational Noise

11.145 The residual completed development building services noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES are no longer valid for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.146 With additional mitigation identified within this addendum in place, it is considered that building services and operational noise from the Early Phases would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse effects (not significant) at all existing residential receptor groupings

Completed Commercial Activity Noise

11.147 The residual commercial activity noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development.

Site Suitability for Noise and Vibration

11.148 On the basis that the noise and vibration assumptions identified in the updated Site suitability assessment would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions, no additional mitigation would be required. Accordingly, the residual effects of noise and railway-induced vibration for proposed on-site receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

Additional Mitigation

Demolition and Construction Stage

11.149 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.150 No additional mitigation is considered feasible with respect to demolition and construction traffic accessing the Site via Empress Place or via Beaumont Avenue.

Completed Development Stage

11.151 No additional mitigation is considered feasible with respect to completed development traffic accessing the site via Empress Place. No additional mitigation is considered feasible for the off-site traffic redistribution effects within Hogarth Road.

11.152 The additional mitigation for building services noise in terms of maximum sound power limits per roof plant area, as presented in the July 2024 ES, is no longer valid.

11.153 Based on the new assessment presented in this addendum, the additional mitigation for completed development building services and operational noise is the same as that stated for the Early Phases scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.154 No additional mitigation for commercial activity noise or for proposed RRV facility noise was presented in the July 2024 ES and this remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Enhancement Measures

11.155 No enhancement measures are proposed in respect of noise and vibration consistent with the July 2024 ES conclusions.

Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Demolition and Construction Activity Noise

11.156 The residual effects of demolition and construction activity noise presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Activity Vibration

11.157 As demonstrated in this addendum, the residual effects of demolition and construction activity vibration presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.158 However, as with the Early Phases, an additional potentially significant vibration effect was identified in the July 2024 assessment but was omitted from reporting (at receptor groups R53 and R55 due to substructure works at Development Zone A). The additional mitigation set out in the July 2024 ES would also be applicable to the Development Zone A works and receptor groups R53 and R55. Vibration from compaction or vibratory piling activity would then be expected to result in temporary, short or medium-term, direct, Minor Adverse residual effects (not significant) at these receptors.

11.159 Therefore, no additional significant residual effects are expected as a result of demolition and construction activity vibration from the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Stage Road Traffic Noise

11.160 As demonstrated in this addendum, as no additional mitigation is considered feasible, additional temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) are expected within receptor groups R04 and R06 (within 15 m of the Empress Place kerb) and within receptor groups R20 to R22 and NR06 near Beaumont Avenue.

11.161 For all other receptor groups, the residual demolition and construction road traffic noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Residual Effects

Completed Development Road Traffic Noise

11.162 As demonstrated in this addendum, the residual completed development road traffic noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of additional permanent, long-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects (significant) effects at the closest receptors within receptor groups R04 and R06 (within 14 m of the Empress Place kerb), additional permanent, longterm, direct, Major Adverse effects (significant) effects at high sensitivity receptors adjacent to Hogarth Road, and additional permanent, long-term, direct, Major Beneficial effects (significant) effects at high sensitivity receptors adjacent to Earls Court Gardens.

Completed Development Building Services and Operational Noise

11.163 The residual completed development building services noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES are no longer valid for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development.

11.164 With additional mitigation identified within this addendum in place, it is considered that building services and operational noise from the All Phases would result in permanent, long-term, direct, Negligible Adverse effects (not significant) at all existing residential receptor groupings.

Completed Development Commercial Activity Noise

11.165 The residual commercial activity noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

Completed Development Proposed RRV Facility Noise

11.166 The residual proposed RRV facility noise effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

Site Suitability for Noise and Vibration

11.167 On the basis that the noise and vibration assumptions identified in the updated Site suitability assessment at Technical Appendix 11A.6A would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions, no additional mitigation would be required Accordingly, the residual effects of noise and railway-induced vibration for proposed on-site receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

11.168 The summary of residual effects as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of the updated conclusions reached in this addendum as presented in Table 11A.28A

11.169 Consistent with the approach adopted in July 2024, for the sake of proportionality and to avoid duplication of results; where NSR groups have been reported as likely to experience different scales of effect over the duration of the demolition and construction programme, the worst-case effect has been reported in Table 11A.28A

Table 11A.28A: Amended Summary of Noise and Vibration Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

Generation of demolition and construction stage road traffic noise None feasible. Moderate (significant)

All other receptor groupings None

(not significant)

Table 11A.28A: Amended Summary of Noise and Vibration Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance

Completed Development

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 12 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 12 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

All other receptor groupings

All receptor groupings outside of the Site boundary

Effects due to completed development stage road traffic noise None feasible. Moderate (significant)

Effects due to completed development stage building services and operational noise

required. Negligible or Minor (not significant)

• For Phase 1, further assessment to be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed on-site to demonstrate the presented limits are not exceeded at all receptors.

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of building services and operational noise to be carried out prior to each phase being implemented, and submitted at the RMA stage

• To be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

(not significant)

All proposed sensitive receptors Existing and future noise effects on proposed on-site completed development stage receptors

• Updated Assumptions in Updated Site Suitability Assessment to be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions. Negligible or Minor (not significant)

Table 11A.28A: Amended Summary of Noise and Vibration Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect **

• Further assessment of noise ingress to be carried out as part of the detailed and technical design for each proposed Outline Component

Development Zone, to be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Mitigation measures in the form of appropriate specification of the building envelope and provision of appropriate ventilation methods to be implemented as required to avoid significant effects within each proposed residential building.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

R20 (LBHF: 1 to 55 Kensington Hall Gardens)

R21 (LBHF: 86 to 98 North End Road (even numbers), 179 to 203a North End Road (odd numbers)

Generation of demolition and construction stage road traffic noise

None feasible. Moderate (significant)

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum

Chapter 11A: Noise and Vibration

Table 11A.28A: Amended Summary of Noise and Vibration Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance

R22 (LBHF: 71-177 North End Road and Famous Three Kings PH)

NR06 (LBHF: Mannequin Factory, 11-19 Beaumont Avenue)

All other receptor groupings None required. Negligible or Minor (not significant)

Completed Development

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 14 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 14 m of Empress Place access road kerb) Generation of completed development stage road traffic noise

Hogarth Road dwellings (RBKC)

Earls Court Gardens dwellings (RBKC)

All other receptor groupings

All receptor groupings outside of the Site boundary

Effects due to completed development stage building services and operational noise

feasible. Moderate (significant)

feasible. Major (significant)

required (beneficial effect)

(significant)

required. Negligible or Minor (not significant)

• For Phase 1, further assessment to be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed on site to demonstrate the presented limits are not exceeded at all receptors.

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of Negligible (not significant)

Table 11A.28A: Amended Summary of Noise and Vibration Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect **

building services and operational noise to be carried out prior to each phase being implemented, and submitted at the RMA stage

• To be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

All proposed sensitive receptors

Existing and future noise effects on proposed on-site completed development stage receptors

• Updated Assumptions in Updated Site Suitability Assessment to be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Further assessment of noise ingress to be carried out as part of the detailed and technical design for each proposed Outline Component Development Zone, to be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Mitigation measures in the form of appropriate specification of the building envelope and provision of appropriate ventilation methods to be implemented as required to avoid significant effects within each proposed residential building.

Negligible or Minor (not significant)

Notes: * - = Adverse/ + = Beneficial/ +/- = Neutral; D = Direct/ I = Indirect; P = Permanent/ T = Temporary; R = Reversible/ IR = Irreversible; St = Short-term/ Mt = Medium-term/ Lt = Long-term.

**Negligible/Minor/Moderate/Major

Court Development

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

11.170 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of the updated conclusions reported in this addendum and have been considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Inter-Project Effects

11.171 The screening of the cumulative schemes within the study area remains as presented within Table 11.39 of the July 2024 ES, with the exception of the additional cumulative schemes at Mund Street School site and ESB, which have been considered in Table 11A.39A

Table 11A.39A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Noise and Vibration Effects

Early Phases

No. Cumulative Scheme

18 Mund Street, 103 Gibbs Green Close, London, W14 9NE

Demolition and Construction Completed Development

Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely?

Potentially Cumulative scheme demolition and construction stage likely to coincide with Amended Proposed Development demolition and construction stage

Occupants of cumulative scheme would be sensitive to noise and vibration from the longer-term Amended Proposed Development demolition and construction works

19 ESB, Empress Place London SW6 1TR No Cumulative scheme unlikely to include substantial demolition and construction activity.

All Phases

Same as Early Phases.

Potentially Cumulative scheme would be sensitive to noise and vibration from the Amended Proposed Development.

Cumulative effects from building services and operational noise could arise

Potentially Cumulative effects from building services and operational noise could arise

11.172 The inter-project cumulative effects assessment reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. A qualitative assessment of the potential cumulative effects of the two additional cumulative schemes are presented below.

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

Combined Effects to Off-Site Receptors

11.173 The Mund Street School site cumulative scheme is understood to include residential towers at 103 Gibbs Green Close, on the site of the previously assessed receptor group NR04 (‘Site of Former Gibbs Green School / Avonmore School’) and has the potential to result in additional cumulative effects due to demolition and construction noise and vibration to that reported in the July 2024 ES.

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report

11A: Noise and Vibration

11.174 The demolition and construction stage for the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme is expected to begin in late 2027 and it is assumed this stage would be complete by the end of 2030. This would coincide with parts of the demolition and construction stage for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases (Phases 0 to 3).

11.175 Demolition and construction activity noise from the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme and demolition and construction noise from the Amended Proposed Development would affect different facades of the nearest off-site receptor groups. Therefore, even when demolition and construction noise from the two schemes occurs at the same time, the cumulative effects would not differ from the effects of the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases in isolation. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.176 Demolition and construction activity vibration from the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme would be greatest at receptor groups R16, R18 and R19 due to proximity. No significant effects are identified at these receptors as a result of demolition and construction activity vibration from the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases (Table 11.31) Furthermore, it is considered unlikely that works resulting in high levels of vibration (compaction or vibratory piling) would coincide and occur at the closest point to these receptor groups. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.177 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street School site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street towards North End Road. The Amended Proposed Development Early Phases is predicted to result in negligible change in road traffic noise on these roads (as shown in Figure 11A.4R). It is considered unlikely that traffic volumes from the Mund Street School site would be sufficient to result in a change of 1 dB on these roads (requiring a 25 % increase in traffic volume). Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Amended Proposed Development Effects to Cumulative Scheme

11.178 It is assumed that the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme would be occupied and a high sensitivity receptor to noise and vibration from 2031 onwards.

11.179 The residual effects of daytime and night-time Early Phases demolition and construction activity noise on receptor group NR04 (site of former Gibbs Green School / Avonmore School) have been reported as not significant.

11.180 Unlike NR04, the cumulative scheme is expected to have direct line of sight to Early Phases demolition and construction activity due to its increased height. Therefore, through qualitative assessment and professional judgement, demolition and construction activity noise levels at this cumulative scheme could be approximately 10 dB greater than reported for NR04. Following the implementation of embedded and additional mitigation measures detailed in the July 2024 ES, residual significant effects are expected at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme as a result of night-time demolition and construction activity noise from the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases. These effects would be temporary, short-term, direct, Moderate Adverse (significant)

11.181 The July 2024 ES Table 11.31 concluded no significant effects at NR04 due to Early Phases demolition and construction activity vibration. The distances between the cumulative scheme and the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases construction activities are expected to be similar to NR04. Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.182 In respect of the Amended Proposed Development’s demolition and construction road traffic noise, traffic associated with the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases demolition and construction stage would not use Mund Street to access the Site and, as per Figure 11A.4R, is not expected to result in any significant change in road traffic noise from North End Road. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Cumulative Scheme Effects to Amended Proposed Development

11.183 Phase 1 of the Amendment Proposed Development, if consented, would be complete by the first quarter of 2030. It is possible that this Phase of the Amended Proposed Development could be occupied while the later stages of construction are occurring for the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme

11.184 It has been assumed, in accordance with standard practice that this cumulative scheme would prepare and implement a CEMP to avoid and minimise the likelihood of significant adverse effects occurring at the early occupied units of the Early Phases. Accordingly, no significant effects are expected to arise from demolition and construction activity noise or vibration from the cumulative scheme.

11.185 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street School site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street towards North End Road. This route is not adjacent to the Amended Proposed Development, and the cumulative scheme demolition and construction vehicle movements on Mund Street are expected to be relatively low in number, intermittent in comparison to the primary road network, and limited to daytime hours. For these reasons, road traffic noise levels at the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases are expected to remain the same as assessed in Technical Appendix 11A.6A. Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Completed Development Effects

Combined Effects to Off-Site Receptors

11.186 Completed development building services noise from the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme and from the Amended Proposed Development have the potential to affect off-site receptors near to the cumulative scheme (R16 and R18 in particular). However, it is likely that the worst-case noise impact from each development would occur on different façades of these receptor groups (those overlooking the respective developments). Furthermore, it is expected that both the cumulative scheme and Amended Proposed Development, if consented, would be required to meet local policy for plant noise, secured through a planning condition. Accordingly, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.187 In the same way, completed development building services noise from the ESB cumulative scheme and from the Amended Proposed Development have the potential to affect off-site receptors near to the cumulative scheme (R09 and R10 in particular). However, the Amended Proposed Development would introduce proposed buildings between the cumulative scheme noise source and these receptor groups and therefore the Amended Proposed Development would likely be the dominant source of building services noise at these receptors due to proximity. Furthermore, it is expected that both the cumulative scheme and Amended Proposed Development, if consented, would be required to meet local policy for plant noise, secured through a planning condition. Accordingly, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.188 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street School site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street and North End Road. The Amended Proposed Development Early Phases is predicted to result in negligible change in road traffic noise on these roads (as shown in Figure 11A.5R). It is considered unlikely that traffic volumes from the Mund Street School site would be sufficient to result in a change of 1 dB on these roads (requiring a 25 % increase in traffic volume). Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Amended Proposed Development Effects to Cumulative Scheme

11.189 The Mund Street School site cumulative scheme would be sensitive to noise and vibration from the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases scenario. This has the potential to result in additional cumulative completed development noise effects to that reported in the July 2024 ES.

11.190 The embedded and additional mitigation measures detailed in this addendum requires further assessment of building services and operational noise, secured through planning condition. Should the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme be consented, this would be an additional receptor within these assessments, and influence the mitigation required for the relevant phase of the Amended Proposed Development. Accounting for this mitigation, it is expected that significant effects would be avoided.

11.191 Subject to the mitigation measures detailed in the July 2024 ES, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme as a result of commercial activity noise.

11.192 In respect of the Amended Proposed Development’s completed development road traffic noise, traffic associated with the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases completed development stage would not use Mund Street to access the Site and, as per Figure 11A.5R, is not expected to result in any significant change in road traffic noise from North End Road. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Cumulative Scheme Effects to Amended Proposed Development

11.193 The publicly available noise impact assessment for the ESB cumulative scheme included the Proposed Development as a receptor, and recommended mitigation measures to avoid significant effects at the proposed Detailed Component buildings. These measures included acoustic screening and attenuation of the proposed ESB plant (including attenuation of air source heat pumps, and enclosure of water source heat pumps and power back-up generators).

11.194 It is expected that planning consent for both cumulative schemes, if granted, would include planning conditions including in relation to noise from plant and building services. This would require further assessments of noise and for which the Amended Proposed Development would be a sensitive receptor. This would lead to suitable mitigation measures being incorporated into the design of each cumulative scheme. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.195 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street School site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street towards North End Road. This route is not adjacent to the Amended Proposed Development, and vehicle movements on Mund Street are expected to remain relatively low in number and intermittent in comparison to the primary road network. For these reasons, road traffic noise levels at the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases are expected to remain the same as assessed in Technical Appendix A11.6. Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

Combined Effects to Off-Site Receptors

11.196 The demolition and construction stage for the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme is expected coincide with parts of the demolition and construction stage for the Amended Proposed Development Early Phases (Phases 0 to 3).

11.197 Demolition and construction noise from the Mund Street school site cumulative scheme and demolition and construction noise from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases (Phases 0 to 3) would affect different facades of the nearest off-site receptor groups. Therefore, should demolition and construction noise from the two schemes occur at the same time, the residual cumulative effects are not expected to be differ from the effects of the Amended Proposed Development All Phases in isolation On this basis, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.198 Demolition and construction activity vibration from the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme would be greatest at receptor groups R16, R18 and R19 due to proximity. Significant effects are identified at receptor groups R16 and R18 as a result of demolition and construction activity vibration from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases (Table 11.36), arising from works at proposed Development Zones U and Z. However, Chapter 5 Figure 5.2 indicates that demolition and construction for these proposed Development Zones would be unlikely to occur until 2035 at the earliest, by which time construction of the cumulative scheme is expected to be complete. It is therefore unlikely that works resulting in high levels of vibration (compaction or vibratory piling) would coincide. The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES (controls on timing of high vibration works, timely liaison with affected receptor occupants, building condition surveys, and vibration monitoring) remains valid. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.199 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street School site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street and North End Road. The Amended Proposed Development All Phases is predicted to result in negligible change in road traffic noise on these roads (as shown in Figure 11A.4R, in common with the Early Phases). It is considered unlikely that traffic volumes from the Mund Street School site would be sufficient to result in a change of 1 dB on these roads (requiring a 25 % increase in traffic volume). Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Amended Proposed Development Effects to Cumulative Scheme

11.200 It is assumed that the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme would be occupied and a high sensitivity receptor to noise and vibration from 2031 onwards.

11.201 Based on a qualitative assessment and professional judgement, significant cumulative effects are expected as a result of daytime demolition and construction activity noise from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases. Following the implementation of embedded and additional mitigation measures detailed in the July 2024 ES, residual significant effects are expected at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme. These effects are expected due to daytime demolition and construction activity noise (temporary, medium-term, direct, Moderate Adverse and temporary, shortterm, direct, Major Adverse effects) and due to night-time demolition and construction activity noise (temporary, shortterm, direct, Major Adverse effects).

11.202 The July 2024 ES Table 11.36 concluded significant residual effects at NR04 due to All Phases demolition and construction activity vibration. The distance between the cumulative scheme and the Amended Proposed Development All Phases construction activities is expected to be similar or less than to NR04. Therefore, additional significant effects

are expected as a result of All Phases demolition and construction activity vibration (temporary, short- or medium-term, direct, Moderate Adverse effects).

11.203 In respect of the Amended Proposed Development’s demolition and construction road traffic noise, traffic associated with the Amended Proposed Development All Phases demolition and construction stage would not use Mund Street to access the Site and, as per Figure 11A.4R, is not expected to result in any significant change in road traffic noise from North End Road. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Cumulative Scheme Effects to Amended Proposed Development

11.204 Phase 1 of the Amended Proposed Development could be occupied while the later stages of construction are occurring for the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme

11.205 On the assumption that, in accordance with standard practice, a CEMP for the Mund Street school site cumulative scheme would be prepared and implemented, this would avoid and minimise the likelihood of significant adverse effects occurring at the early occupied units of the All Phases. Accordingly, no significant effects are expected to arise from demolition and construction activity noise or vibration from the cumulative scheme.

11.206 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street school site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street and towards North End Road. This route is not directly adjacent to the Amended Proposed Development, and the cumulative scheme demolition and construction vehicle movements on Mund Street are expected to be relatively low in number, intermittent in comparison to the primary road network, and limited to daytime hours. For these reasons, road traffic noise levels at the Amended Proposed Development All Phases are expected to remain the same as assessed in Technical Appendix A11.6. Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Completed Development Effects

Combined Effects to Off-Site Receptors

11.207 Completed development building services noise impacts from the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme and from the Amended Proposed Development would occur on different façades of receptor groups R16 and R18 (those overlooking the respective development). Furthermore, it is expected that both the cumulative scheme and Amended Proposed Development, if consented, would be required to meet local policy for plant noise, secured through a planning condition. Accordingly, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.208 As with the Early Phases, the Amended Proposed Development would introduce proposed buildings between the ESB cumulative scheme noise source and the nearest receptor groups (R09 and R10), screening noise from the cumulative scheme. The Amended Proposed Development would likely be the dominant source of building services noise at these receptors. Furthermore, it is expected that both the cumulative scheme and Amended Proposed Development, if consented, would be required to meet local policy for plant noise, secured through a planning condition. Accordingly, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.209 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street School site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street and North End Road. The Amended Proposed Development All Phases is predicted to result in negligible change in road traffic noise on these roads (as shown in Figure 11A.6R). It is considered unlikely that traffic volumes from the Mund Street School site would be sufficient to result in a change of 1 dB on these roads (requiring a 25 % increase in traffic volume). Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Amended Proposed Development Effects to Cumulative Scheme

11.210 The Mund Street School site cumulative scheme would be sensitive to noise and vibration from the Amended Proposed Development All Phases scenario, including completed development building services and operational noise

11.211 The embedded and additional mitigation measures detailed in this ES Addendum Chapter requires further assessment of building services and operational noise, secured through planning condition, to consider the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme (if consented) as an additional receptor. Accounting for this mitigation, it is expected that significant effects would be avoided.

11.212 Subject to the mitigation measures detailed in the July 2024 ES, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme as a result of commercial activity noise or proposed RRV facility noise.

11.213 In respect of the Amended Proposed Development’s completed development road traffic noise, traffic associated with the Amended Proposed Development All Phases completed development stage would not use Mund Street to access the Site and, as per Figure 11A.6R, is not expected to result in any significant change in road traffic noise from North End Road. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Cumulative Scheme Effects to Amended Proposed Development

11.214 As with the Early Phases, it is expected that planning consent for both cumulative schemes in Table 11A.39A, if granted, would include planning conditions including in relation to noise from plant and building services, leading to suitable mitigation measures being incorporated into the design of each cumulative scheme. No additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

11.215 Traffic generation and routing associated with the Mund Street school site are unknown at this stage. However, the point of access onto the wider road network is expected to be via Mund Street towards North End Road. This route is not directly adjacent to the Amended Proposed Development, and vehicle movements on Mund Street are expected to remain relatively low in number and intermittent in comparison to the primary road network. For these reasons, road traffic noise levels at the Amended Proposed Development All Phases are expected to remain the same as assessed in Technical Appendix A11.6. Therefore, no additional significant cumulative effects are expected.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

11.216 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have not required updates to the assessment

11.217 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building massing, footprint and balconies of the Amended Detailed Component; the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component; as well as the floorspace area schedules of the Amended Detailed and Outline Components.

11.218 In respect of baseline conditions, on-site conditions have not materially changed

11.219 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of the following likely noise and vibration effects:

• The demolition and construction activity noise effects of the Early Phases and All Phases;

• The demolition and construction vibration effects of the Early Phases and All Phases;

• The completed development commercial activity noise effects of the Early Phases and All Phases; and

• The completed development sound of an industrial nature generated by the proposed RRV facility of the All Phases.

11.220 Additional significant adverse effects have been identified in respect of the following:

Early Phases

• The changes in road traffic noise that would occur during the demolition and construction stage are expected to result in significant adverse effects at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road. No additional mitigation is deemed feasible for these effects.

• The changes in road traffic noise that would occur during the completed development stage are expected to result in significant adverse effects at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road. No additional mitigation is deemed feasible for these effects.

All Phases

• The changes in road traffic noise that would occur during the demolition and construction stage are expected to result in significant adverse at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road and Beaumont Avenue. No additional mitigation is deemed feasible for these effects.

• The changes in road traffic noise that would occur during the completed development stage are expected to result in additional significant adverse effects at the closest receptors to the Empress Place access road; additional significant adverse effects at high sensitivity receptors adjacent to Hogarth Road; and additional significant

beneficial effects at high sensitivity receptors adjacent to Earls Court Gardens. No additional mitigation is deemed feasible for the identified adverse effects.

11.221 The assumptions relating to completed development building services noise in the July 2024 ES are no longer valid. Therefore, amended assumptions have been applied, comprising the definition of appropriate building services and operational noise limits for the first phase, and requirement for further assessment and consultation with the two local planning authorities for the later phases. Assuming this design development and implementation is secured by an appropriately worded planning condition, no additional or different significant residual effects are expected and the July 2024 ES conclusions would remain valid.

11.222 On the basis that the noise and vibration assumptions identified in the updated Site suitability assessment would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions, the residual effects of noise and railway-induced vibration for proposed on-site receptors presented in the July 2024 ES would remain valid.

11.223 A qualitative assessment of two further cumulative schemes has identified additional significant cumulative effects from those presented in the July 2024 ES, on the assumptions that embedded and additional mitigation adopted by the Amended Proposed Development, would also be adopted by the two cumulative schemes and secured by planning condition. Additional significant adverse cumulative effects are expected as a result of the following:

Early Phases

• Night-time demolition and construction activity noise at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme

All Phases

• Daytime demolition and construction activity noise at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme;

• Night-time demolition and construction activity noise at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme; and

• Demolition and construction activity vibration at the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme

12A ECOLOGY

Introduction

12.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely ecological effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in any additional or different effects to those presented in the ecology assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; building footprint and landscaping of the Amended Detailed Component; development zone maximum horizontal parameters and biodiversity focussed design codes of the Amended Outline Component

12.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 12: Ecology and Volume 3, Technical Appendix 12.1: Earls Court Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

12.3 The chapter is supported by the following amended technical appendix in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Appendix 12A.1A: Earls Court Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Addendum

12.4 Technical Appendix 12A.1A contains the 2021 invertebrate survey report and the 2021 and 2024 bird surveys reports.

12.5 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid

Methodology

12.6 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the Ecology assessment

12.7 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

12.8 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking the assessment. While minor text updates have been made to the draft policies previously considered, these do not introduce any new considerations for the ecology assessment.

12.9 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

12.10 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

12.11 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman The full set of review comments and responses are provided in Technical Appendix 2A.10 in ES Volume 3A.

12.12 The Waterman, RBKC and LBHF post-application submission review comments have required clarification and consideration of the following in the assessment:

• WLL SINCs (designated sites) impacts in the event the Bioline is not delivered and the existing SINC is retained and enhanced;

• WLL SINCs (designated sites) (whether retained or with the Bioline) impacts from overshadowing, wind and artificial lighting; and

• Brompton Cemetery SINC (designated sites) impacts from increased visitor footfall.

12.13 In addition, the 2021 invertebrate survey report and the 2021 and 2024 bird survey reports have been provided in Technical Appendix 12A.1A.

Assessment Scope

12.14 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Characterisation Method

12.15 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

12.16 In respect of the invertebrate site walkovers, a Preliminary Invertebrate Habitat Appraisal Survey (PIHAS) was undertaken in 2021 and 2023 by acknowledged invertebrate experts with extensive invertebrate survey experience in South-East England, for which there is no formal guidance. Habitat was assessed against Defra criteria3

12.17 In respect of bird surveys, the 2021 and 2024 surveys were undertaken based on RSPB Bird Monitoring Guidance4

12.18 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

12.19 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However, the assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

12.20 As outlined in Chapter 2A, the Illustrative Landscape Scheme represents one version of how the Applicant’s UGF commitments could be achieved for the Outline Component. The Applicant’s commitments in respect of UGF and BNG, as presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid. Accordingly, it is not considered proportionate, nor necessary to undertake further assessment of the UGF Illustrative Landscape Scheme.

Assessment Criteria

12.21 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

12.22 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Conditions

12.23 Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, existing infrastructure has been utilised and no new infrastructure has been built. Therefore, the baseline conditions and sensitive receptors presented in the ecology assessment of the July 2024 ES, remain materially valid.

3 Riding, A., Critchley, N., Wilson, L. and Parker, J. 2010 Definition and mapping of open mosaic habitats on previously developed land: Phase 1. Defra Research Report WC0722

4 G., Gibbons, D.W., & Evans, J. 1998. Bird Monitoring Methods: A Manual of Techniques for UK Key Species. The Royal Society for the protection of Birds, Sandy, Bedfordshire, England.

12.24 In respect of designated sites, habitats and protected species, as on-site conditions have not materially changed, and third party data and surveys undertaken remain within their validity period (in accordance with CIEEM guidance5), the existing baseline conditions and sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES are considered to remain materially valid

Assessment of Effects

12.25 The assessment has considered the following proposed amendments:

• Detailed Component plot internal layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations6 and resulting amendments to:

building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

external communal residential amenity space layouts and landscaping at Plots EC05, WB03, WB04, WB05; public realm and open space layouts and landscaping at Plots EC05 and EC06;

• Outline Component Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

• Outline Component Design Codes, in particular new and amended landscaping and biodiversity design codes in response to post-application submission comments:

New West Brompton Square design codes to ensure that the landscaping enhances the on-site SINC ecological corridor and respond to and aligns with off-site Brompton Cemetery SINC's character; Amended and new play space design codes to clarify the approach to integrated planting and play space; to ensure planting establishes and retains high biodiversity value; and to include ‘undisturbed ecological habitats’ in the sitewide biodiversity diagram; and

New design codes to address potential building maintenance issues in relation to close proximity existing trees.

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

12.26 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development This is because the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of potential impacts.

Designated Sites

12.27 From an ecological perspective, the option of decking over the WLL SINCs to deliver the Bioline, represents a worstcase in respect of demolition and construction impacts and was therefore assessed within the July 2024 ES. The conclusions of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

12.28 In respect of the WLL SINCs, post-application submission review comments have raised concern regarding the potential impacts and effects in the event that the Bioline is not delivered. Accordingly, this alternative scenario has been considered in the following paragraphs.

12.29 Should the Bioline not be delivered, demolition and construction impacts on the SINC would be managed through industry good practice measures and controls as described in ES Chapter 5: Demolition and Construction Description of the July 2024 ES and Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description of this Volume.

12.30 Landscape enhancement (removal of non-native species and planting with native scrub and grassland habitat) would be undertaken on the retained on-site WLL SINCs, subject to the agreement with Network Rail. The retained and enhanced WLL SINCs would be inaccessible to visitors and would provide wildlife-only habitat. The existing railside habitats forming the WLL SINCs would be retained and enhanced, subject to agreement with Network Rail, with additional native planting, to provide further habitat for species using the wildlife corridor. In this instance, species would

be able to commute beneath the road through the rail tunnel, to habitat adjacent to West Brompton Station. Consistent with the approach to be adopted for the Bioline, landscaping would comprise predominantly native species with mixed scrub, climbing plants, and other neutral grassland (wildflower grassland mix), with additional biodiversity features such as log piles, stumperies and invertebrate boxes. As the existing habitats are comprised of a majority of non-native planting, this would be an ecological improvement compared with the existing habitat.

12.31 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, the ecological effect for retaining the existing SINC would be Significant Adverse at the Site Level, due to the temporary removal of existing habitat. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be temporary, medium-term, direct and indirect Negligible Adverse (not significant)

Completed Development Effects

12.32 The completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of potential impacts.

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC

12.33 In respect of the Brompton Cemetery SINC, post-submission review comments have raised concern regarding the potential impacts and effects from increased footfall. Accordingly, further detail has been provided in the following paragraphs.

12.34 Multi-modal transport modelling for the All Phases development scenario of the Proposed Development estimated pedestrian and cyclist trips through Brompton Cemetery SINC. The technical assessor has confirmed that the data remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. No data is available for the Early Phases development scenario and the All Phases assessment is considered to be a worst case

12.35 Adopting a worst-case assessment, in the weekday during the TA defined peak hours, the modelling predicts that there would be an increase in pedestrian and cyclists trips through the cemetery of up to 67 %. Peaks periods for trips through the cemetery are likely to be highest between 8 am and 9 am and between 5 pm and 6 pm, when commuting activity is most likely to occur. Lunchtime and education facility finishing times are likely to result in smaller, additional peaks

12.36 Due to the highly urban nature of Brompton Cemetery SINC, its large size (16 ha), the existing pedestrian and cyclist trips and because extensive accessible green space would be provided within the Amended Proposed Development, significant adverse effects on the Brompton Cemetery SINC as a result of increased visitor pressure are not considered likely. The majority of additional visitors to the Brompton Cemetery SINC from the Amended Proposed Development would be expected to use the extensive network of paved paths running through the SINC, without stopping for any length of time and without causing damage to vegetation. Picnic spots are not provided within the SINC, which would discourage use of the SINC for extended lunch stops.

12.37 Furthermore, free-ranging pets are unlikely to pose a concern to wildlife at the cemetery, due to the location of the busy road (A3218 Old Brompton Road) between the Amended Proposed Development and the SINC. Off-lead dog walking is not permitted in the SINC and signage is already in place to discourage this. Brompton Cemetery SINC is closed to visitors at night, and is already well-managed for nature conservation. Whilst some increased usage may occur as a result of increased visitor numbers from the Amended Proposed Development, potentially resulting in additional wear of grass on the corners of pathways, this is not considered likely to occur to an extent that would reduce the nature conservation importance of the SINC

12.38 Therefore, in accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, there is likely to be No Significant effect on the Brompton Cemetery SINC from increased footfall In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, indirect Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.39 In respect of the WLL SINCs, review comments have raised concern regarding the potential impacts and effects in the event that the Bioline is not delivered Accordingly, the following paragraphs consider this alternative scenario

12.40 Should the Bioline not be delivered, the WLL SINCs would be retained with existing connections to the north and south maintained. Newly planted landscape enhancement would be maintained, ongoing improvements made and maintenance undertaken, subject to agreement with Network Rail New planting in adjacent areas of the Amended Proposed Development would provide additional functional links with the SINCs and off-site habitat. The area would be inaccessible to visitors and this has been captured in updated design codes

12.41 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, the retention and enhancement of the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in Significant Beneficial effects at up to the Local Level. In accordance with the EIAsignificance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant).

12.42 Irrespective of whether the Bioline is delivered or not, the WLL SINCs has the potential to be affected by overshadowing and amended wind microclimate conditions from new built massing, as well as artificial lighting

12.43 In response to post-submission comments, detailed review of the transient overshadowing plots presented in Technical Appendix 15.10 of the July 2024 ES, have been undertaken. These plots are considered to remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development due to the minor nature of the proposed height and massing amendments

12.44 The plots indicate that overshadowing of the WLL SINCs within the Site (or to be replaced in the south should the Bioline be delivered) would occur as a result of the Early Phases Overshadowing of the off-site Brompton Cemetery SINC to the south of the Site would not occur.

12.45 As many species would be dormant and plants not actively growing in winter, overshadowing is less likely to affect ecological receptors. Accordingly, December 21st overshadowing has not been considered further Table 12A.1N summarises the degree of Early Phases overshadowing for March 21st and June 21st

Table 12A.1N: Early Phases WLL SINC Overshadowing Results

SINC 21st March 21st June

WLL South At sunrise (approximately 08:00 GMT), the WLL corridor running centrally through the Site, and also the SINC within the southern part of the Site would be partially cast in shadow from the Early Phases By 10:00 GMT these areas would mostly be in sunlight, with a smaller area of the WLL corridor being overshadowed. Throughout the morning and afternoon, the WLL corridor and SINC area would be intermittently in shadow and sunlight until sunset at approximately 17:00 GMT.

At sunrise (approximately 06:00 BST), the WLL corridor and SINC within the southern part of the Site would be entirely cast in shadow from the Early Phases Throughout the morning as the shadows move in a more northerly direction, the shadows reduce in size. By 10:00 BST these areas would mostly be in sunlight, with a smaller area of the WLL corridor overshadowed. Throughout the morning and afternoon, the WLL corridor and SINC area would mostly be in sunlight, with intermittent periods of shadow. From 16:00 BST, the WLL corridor and southern SINC would start to become overshadowed which would remain until sunset.

Table 12A.1N: Early Phases WLL SINC Overshadowing Results

SINC 21st March 21st June

already occurring. Throughout the morning the Early Phases shadows move in a clockwise direction away from the SINC, clearing completely by 10:00 GMT. The existing structures along the western side of the WLL corridor (Avonmore Road) would cause periods of overshadowing to the WLL corridor throughout the afternoon. The SINC would mostly be in sunlight from 10:00 GMT to 15:00 GMT, with the existing LBD buildings casting a small strip of shadow between 15:00 GMT and 17:00 GMT (sunset).

shadows to the WLL corridor at 14:00 BST. At 17:00 BST, the LBD buildings would cast a minimal amount of shadow to the SINC until sunset

WLL North At sunrise (approximately 08:00 GMT), shadows would be cast in a north-westerly direction. The SINC in the north of the Site and a small portion of the WLL corridor to the immediate north would be partially overshadowed from the Early Phases located in the north-eastern part of the Site. The existing Tesco buildings east of the railway line already cause overshadowing to the WLL corridor, and the additional shadows of the Early Phases would be of a similar scale and extent to those

At sunrise (approximately 06:00 BST), shadows are cast in a westerly direction. A portion of the SINC would be overshadowed from the Early Phases located in the north-eastern part of the Site. The existing Tesco buildings already casts a strip of shadowing to the WLL corridor. Throughout the morning the Early Phases shadows would move in a clockwise direction away from the SINC, clearing completely by 10:00 BST. The WLL corridor and SINC would be in sunlight until the existing Avonmore Road properties begin to cast

Guidance Note 8 Bats and Artificial Lighting. Available at: https://theilp.org.uk/publication/guidance-note-8-bats-and-artificial-lighting/.

12.46 Overshadowing from the Early Phases is predicted to be transient with direct sunlight availability occurring during the day. Ecological features (habitats and species) already present within the WLL rail corridor and WLL SINCs are not considered to be sensitive to partial shading. New planting would be designed to be tolerant of some levels of overshadowing

12.47 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, overshadowing of the habitats within the WLL SINCs has the potential to result in Significant Adverse effects at no more than the Site Level. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.48 In accordance with standard practice, the wind microclimate assessment in the July 2024 ES considers wind comfort and safety in respect of pedestrian use. Accordingly, ecological receptors were not considered. Nevertheless, wind speeds have been reviewed to provide commentary on the likely effects on the WLL SINC. The technical assessor has confirmed that the July 2024 conclusions remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

12.49 Existing modelled wind conditions at probe locations in the area of the proposed Bioline reported LDDC comfort category ‘Sitting’ conditions. Following the introduction of the Early Phases, ‘Sitting’ conditions are reported for the both the summer and windiest season, with only one location recorded as ‘Standing’ conditions in the windiest season (see ES Chapter 16: Wind of the July 2024 ES for further details on this). No unsafe conditions were reported. Accordingly, reported wind conditions would be materially similar to the existing baseline

12.50 This is n accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, wind microclimate effects on the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in No Significant Adverse effects. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.51 As previously stated, sensitive lighting design would be adopted along the retained WLL SINCs following guidance and principles provided in the BCT and Institution of Lighting Professionals (‘ILP’) Guidance Note 08/23 ‘Bats and artificial lighting in the UK’7 (or as updated), with an assumption against lighting of areas of important retained and new habitats and minimising light spill from lit areas. This, together with provision of scrub canopy cover would enable bats and birds to navigate along the SINCs and to adjacent habitat along relatively dark corridors. Species using the area are likely to be tolerant to moderate light levels.

12.52 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, lighting effects on the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in Significant Adverse effects at up to the Site Level. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.53 Accordingly, in accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, on balance, decking over the WLL SINCs to deliver the Bioline or retaining and enhancing the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs, along with associated lighting, shading and wind changes, has the potential to cumulatively result in Significant Beneficial effects at up to the Local Level. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant). Therefore, the conclusion reached in the July 2024, remains valid.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

12.54 The demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of potential impacts

Designated Sites

12.55 From an ecological perspective, the option of decking over the WLL SINCs to deliver the Bioline, represents a worstcase in respect of demolition and construction impacts and was therefore assessed within the July 2024 ES The conclusions of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

12.56 In respect of the WLL SINCs, post-submission review comments have raised concern regarding the potential impacts and effects in the event that the Bioline is not delivered. Accordingly, this alternative scenario has been considered in the following paragraphs.

12.57 Should the Bioline not be delivered, demolition and construction impacts would be managed through industry good practice measures and controls as described in ES Chapter 5: Demolition and Construction Description of the July 2024 ES and Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description of this Volume.

12.58 Landscape enhancement (removal of non-native species and planting with native scrub and grassland habitat) would be undertaken of the retained on-site WLL SINCs, subject to the agreement with TfL. The retained and enhanced WLL SINCs would be inaccessible to visitors and would provide wildlife-only habitat. The existing railside habitats forming the WLL SINCs would be enhanced with additional native planting, to provide further habitat for species using the wildlife corridor. In this instance, species would be able to commute beneath the road through the rail tunnel, to habitat adjacent to West Brompton Station. Consistent with the approach to be adopted for the Bioline, landscaping would comprise predominantly native species with mixed scrub and other neutral grassland (wildflower grassland mix), with additional biodiversity features such as log piles, stumperies and invertebrate boxes. As the existing habitats are largely nonnative, this would be ecologically better, and different, to the existing habitat.

12.59 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, the ecological effect for retaining the existing SINC would be Significant Adverse at the Site Level, due to the temporary removal of existing habitat In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be temporary, medium-term, direct and indirect Negligible Adverse (not significant).

Completed Development Effects

12.60 The completed development stage effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. This is because the relevant proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of potential impacts.

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC

12.61 In respect of the Brompton Cemetery SINC, post-submission review comments have raised concern regarding the potential impacts and effects from increased footfall. Accordingly, further detail has been provided in the following paragraphs.

12.62 Multi-modal transport modelling for the All Phases of the Proposed Development estimated pedestrian and cyclist trips through Brompton Cemetery SINC. The technical assessor has confirmed that the data remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. No data is available for the Early Phases development scenario.

12.63 In the weekday during the TA defined peak hours, the modelling predicts that there would be an increase in pedestrian and cyclists trips through the cemetery of up to 67 %. Peaks periods for trips through the cemetery are likely to be highest between 8 am and 9 am and between 5 pm and 6 pm, when commuting activity is most likely to occur. Lunchtime and education facility finishing times are likely to result in smaller, additional peaks.

12.64 Due to the highly urban nature of Brompton Cemetery SINC, its large size (16 ha), the existing pedestrian and cyclist trips and because extensive accessible green space would be provided within the Amended Proposed Development,

significant adverse effects on the Brompton Cemetery SINC as a result of increased visitor pressure are not considered likely. The majority of additional visitors to the Brompton Cemetery SINC from the Amended Proposed Development would be expected to use the extensive network of paved paths running through the SINC, without stopping for any length of time and without causing damage to vegetation. Picnic spots are not provided within the SINC, which would discourage use of the SINC for extended lunch stops

12.65 Furthermore, free-ranging pets are unlikely to pose a concern to wildlife at the cemetery, due to the location of the busy road (Old Brompton Road A3218) between the Amended Proposed Development and the SINC. Off-lead dog walking is not permitted in the SINC and signage is already in place to discourage this. The SINC is closed to visitors at night, and is already well-managed for nature conservation. Whilst some increased usage may occur as a result of increased visitor numbers from the Amended Proposed Development, potentially resulting in additional wear of grass on the corners of pathways, this is not considered likely to occur to an extent that would reduce the nature conservation importance of the SINC.

12.66 Therefore, in accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, there is likely to be No Significant effect on the Brompton Cemetery SINC from increased footfall. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, indirect Negligible Adverse (not significant).

WLL SINC

12.67 In respect of the WLL SINCs, review comments have raised concern regarding the potential impacts and effects in the event that the Bioline is not delivered Accordingly, the following paragraphs consider this alternative scenario.

12.68 Should the Bioline not be delivered, the WLL SINCs would be retained with existing connections to north and south maintained. Newly planted landscape enhancement would be maintained, ongoing improvements made and maintenance undertaken, subject to agreement with TfL. New planting in adjacent areas of the Proposed Development would provide additional functional links with the SINCs and off-site habitat. The area would be inaccessible to visitors.

12.69 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, the retention and enhancement of the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in Significant Beneficial effects at up to the Local Level. In accordance with the EIAsignificance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant).

12.70 Irrespective of whether the Bioline is delivered or not, the WLL SINCs has the potential to be affected by overshadowing and amended wind microclimate conditions from new built massing, as well as artificial lighting.

12.71 In response to post-submission comments, detailed review of the transient overshadowing plots presented in Technical Appendix 15.10 of the July 2024 ES, have been undertaken. These plots are considered to remain materially valid for the Amended Proposed Development due to the minor nature of the proposed height and massing amendments.

12.72 The plots indicate that overshadowing of the WLL SINCs within the Site (or to be replaced in the south should the Bioline be delivered) would occur as a result of the All Phases Overshadowing of the off-site Brompton Cemetery SINC to the south of the Site would not occur.

12.73 As many species would be dormant and plants not actively growing in winter, overshadowing is less likely to affect ecological receptors. Accordingly, December 21st overshadowing has not been considered further Table 12A.2N summarises the degree of All Phases overshadowing for March 21st and June 21st

SINC 21st March 21st June

WLL South At sunrise (approximately 08:00 GMT), the WLL corridor running centrally through the Site, and also the SINC within the southern part of the Site would be partially cast in shadow from the Proposed Development. By 10:00 GMT these areas would mostly be in sunlight, with a smaller area of the WLL corridor being overshadowed. At sunrise (approximately 06:00 BST), the WLL corridor and SINC within the southern part of the Site would be entirely cast in shadow from the Proposed Development. Throughout the morning as the shadows move in a more northerly direction, the shadows reduce in size. By 10:00 BST these areas would mostly be in sunlight, with a smaller area of the WLL corridor overshadowed. Throughout the morning and afternoon, the WLL corridor and SINC area would

Table 12A.2N: All Phases WLL SINC Overshadowing Results

Table

12A.2N:

All Phases WLL SINC Overshadowing Results

SINC 21st March 21st June

mostly be in sunlight, with intermittent periods of shadow. From 16:00 BST, the WLL corridor and southern SINC would start to become overshadowed which would remain until sunset.

WLL North At sunrise (approximately 08:00 GMT), shadows would be cast in a north-westerly direction. The SINC in the north of the Site and a small portion of the WLL corridor to the immediate north would be partially overshadowed from the All Phases located in the north-eastern part of the Site. The existing Tesco buildings east of the railway line already cause overshadowing to the WLL corridor, and the additional shadows of the All Phases would be of a similar scale and extent to those already occurring. Throughout the morning the All Phases shadows move in a clockwise direction away from the SINC, clearing completely by 10:00 GMT. From 10:00 GMT, the proposed blocks along West Cromwell Road and centrally within the proposed All Phases would cast strips of shadow in a northerly direction upon the WLL corridor and the SINC. These shadows would move in an easterly clockwise direction, increasing in size across the WLL corridor and SINC throughout the morning. By 14:00 GMT, the green corridor would be almost completely in shadow from the existing Avonmore Road buildings, and the SINC would be overshadowed by the All Phases which would remain until approximately 17:00 GMT.

At sunrise (approximately 06:00 BST), shadows are cast in a westerly direction. A portion of the SINC would be overshadowed from the All Phases located in the north-eastern part of the Site. The existing Tesco buildings already casts a strip of shadowing to the WLL corridor. Throughout the morning the All Phases shadows would move in a clockwise direction away from the SINC, clearing completely by 10:00 BST. From 11:00 BST, the proposed blocks along West Cromwell Road and centrally within the proposed All Phases would cast strips of shadow in a north-easterly direction over the SINC. These shadows would move in an easterly clockwise direction, increasing in size across the WLL corridor and SINC throughout the remainder of the morning and early afternoon. By 14:00 BST, the WLL corridor would be almost completely in shadow from the existing Avonmore Road buildings, and the SINC overshadowed by the All Phases which remain until sunset.

12.74 In respect of the southern area of the WLL SINCs, overshadowing from the All Phases is predicted to be the same as the Early Phases, that being transient with direct sunlight availability occurring during the day However, overshadowing to the northern areas of the WLL SINCs would occur all day. The ecological features (habitats and species) within the WLL SINCs are not considered to be sensitive to overshadowing, with non-native plant species and mixed scrub currently present. Animal species requiring direct sunlight such as reptiles and rarer invertebrates have not been identified using this habitat. New planting would be designed to be tolerant of shading, with broadleaved woodland and mixed scrub proposed. Furthermore, the overshadowing would only affect a small proportion of the whole WLL SINCs.

12.75 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, overshadowing of the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in Significant Adverse effects at up to the Site Level. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.76 In accordance with standard practice, the wind microclimate assessment in the July 2024 ES considers wind comport and safety in respect of pedestrian use. Accordingly, ecological receptors were not considered. Nevertheless, wind speeds have been reviewed to provide commentary on the likely effects on the WLL SINC. The technical assessor has confirmed that the July 2024 conclusions remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

12.77 Existing modelled wind conditions at probe locations in the area of the proposed Bioline report LDDC comfort category ‘Sitting’ conditions. Following the introduction of the All Phases, ‘Sitting’ conditions are reported for the both the summer and windiest season, with only one location recorded as ‘Standing’ conditions in the windiest season (see ES Chapter 16: Wind of the July 2024 ES for further details on this). No unsafe conditions were reported. Accordingly, reported wind conditions would be materially similar to the existing baseline.

12.78 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, wind microclimate effects on the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in No Significant Adverse effects. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.79 As previously stated, sensitive lighting design would be adopted along the retained WLL SINCs following guidance and principles provided in the BCT and ILP Guidance Note 08/23 ‘Bats and artificial lighting in the UK’8 (or as updated), with an assumption against lighting of areas of important retained and new habitats and minimising light spill from lit areas. This, together with provision of scrub canopy cover would enable bats and birds to navigate along the SINC and to adjacent habitat along relatively dark corridors. Species using the area are likely to be tolerant to moderate light levels.

12.80 In accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, lighting effects on the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs has the potential to result in Significant Adverse effects at up to the Site Level. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be permanent, long-term, direct Negligible Adverse (not significant).

12.81 Accordingly, in accordance with the CIEEM significance of effect criteria, on balance, decking over the WLL SINCs to deliver the Bioline or retaining and enhancing the habitats at the existing WLL SINCs, along with associated lighting, shading and wind changes, has the potential to result in Significant Beneficial effects at up to the Local Level. In accordance with the EIA significance of effects criteria, the ecological effect would be (permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant). Therefore, the conclusion of the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

12.82 The additional mitigation, residual effects and enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

12.83 The additional mitigation, residual effects and enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

12.84 The summary of residual effects as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid with the exception of the receptors presented in Table 12A.7A which presents the assessment conclusions for the Amended Proposed Development.

Table 12A.7A: Amended Summary of Ecology Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation CIEEM Significance at Geographic Scale EIA Scale and Significance of Residual Effect ** Nature of Residual Effect*

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction

Designated Sites Brompton Cemetery SINC and Bioline delivery at WLL SINCs - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution and loss of connectivity None required Significant at up to the Local Level

Minor (not significant)

8ILP, 2023. Guidance Note 8 Bats and Artificial Lighting. Available at: https://theilp.org.uk/publication/guidance-note-8-bats-and-artificial-lighting/.

Table 12A.7A: Amended Summary of Ecology Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation CIEEM Significance at Geographic Scale EIA Scale and Significance of Residual Effect

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Retention of WLL SINCs - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution None required Significant at the Site Level/ Negligible (not significant)

Completed Development

Designated Sites

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Bioline Delivery at WLL SINCs - Habitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement.

Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects None required Significant at the Local Level Minor (not significant)

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Retention of WLL SINCs – Habitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement

Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects

All Phases

Demolition and Construction

required Significant at the Local Level Minor (not significant)

Designated Sites Brompton Cemetery and Bioline delivery at WLL SINCs - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution and loss of connectivity. None required Significant at the Local Level Minor (not significant)

Designated Sites Brompton Cemetery and WLL SINCs Retention - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution None required Significant at the Local Level Negligible (not significant)

Completed Development

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Bioline Delivery at WLL SINCs - Habitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement.

Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects None required Significant at the Local Level Minor (not significant)

Table 12A.7A: Amended Summary of Ecology Residual Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation CIEEM Significance at Geographic Scale EIA Scale and Significance of Residual Effect ** Nature of Residual Effect*

Designated Sites Brompton Cemetery SINC and Retention of WLL SINCs

– Habitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement

Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects

Notes:

None required Significant at the Local Level Minor (not significant) + D P R Lt

* - = Adverse/ + = Beneficial/ +/- = Neutral; D = Direct/ I = Indirect; P = Permanent/ T = Temporary; R = Reversible/ IR = Irreversible; St = Short-term/ Mt = Medium-term/ Lt = Long-term.

**Negligible/Minor/Moderate/Major

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

12.85 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are presented in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects.

Inter-Project Effects

12.86 The inter-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development As outlined in ES Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the Mund Street School site, as presented in Table 12A.8A

Table 12.8A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Ecology Effects

No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason

Early Phases

18 Mund Street School site No Demolition and construction works may overlap. Adoption of standard mitigation, e.g. CEMP would avoid, reduce and mitigate cumulative effects.

No Whilst the cumulative scheme is located immediately to the west of the Site, it is not considered likely to have sufficient ecological features prior to or following development to result in cumulatively significant adverse or beneficial effects. Cumulative effects of increased visitor pressure on Brompton Cemetery SINC considered unlikely due to distance from the SINC and proximity of closer transport links

Table 12.8A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Ecology Effects

No Cumulative Development

Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely?

All Phases

Same as Early Phases.

Early Phases

12.87 The demolition and construction and completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes remains unchanged from those previously reported in the July 2024 ES for Early Phases.

All Phases

12.88 The demolition and construction and completed development cumulative effects resulting from the Amended Proposed Development and amended cumulative schemes remains unchanged from those previously reported in the July 2024 ES for All Phases.

Summary ofAssessment

Post-Application Submission

12.89 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required assessment of likely effects on the:

• WLL SINCs (designated sites) in the event the Bioline is not delivered and the existing on-site SINC is retained and enhanced;

• WLLSINCs (designated sites)(whether retained or with the Bioline) from overshadowing, wind and artificial lighting; and

• Brompton Cemetery SINC (designated site) from increased visitor footfall.

12.90 In addition, the 2021 invertebrate survey report and 2021 and 2024 bird surveys reports have been provided.

12.91 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; building footprint and landscaping of the Detailed Component; development zone maximum horizontal parameters and biodiversity focussed design codes of the Outline Component.

12.92 In respect of baseline conditions, on-site conditions have not materially changed regarding designated sites, habitats and protected species, and third party data and surveys undertaken remain within their validity period (in accordance with CIEEM guidance).

12.93 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of likely ecological effects.

12.94 In respect of the WLL SINCs (designated sites) (whether retained or with the Bioline) likely effects from enhancement or replacement of habitats and from overshadowing, wind and artificial lighting are on balance predicted not to be significant in EIA terms

12.95 Consideration of a potential cumulative scheme at the Mund Street School site has concluded that no inter-project cumulative effects are likely to arise on the basis that standard practice mitigation measures (CEMP, landscaping and BNG) are adopted and secured.

12.96 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of likely ecological effects.

12.97 Accordingly, no additional or different significant effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

13A GROUND CONDITIONS

Introduction

13.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely ground conditions effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the ground conditions assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; below ground and building footprint proposals of the Amended Detailed Component; and below ground and development zone maximum horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component

13.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 13: Ground Conditions and Volume 3, Appendix 13.1 Geo-Environmental Preliminary Risk Assessment of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green. Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

13.3 This chapter is supported by the following addendum technical appendix in 2025 ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Appendix 13A.1A: Geo-Environmental Preliminary Risk Assessment Addendum

13.4 The introduction as presented in the July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid

Methodology

13.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the ground conditions assessment.

13.6 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

13.7 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking the assessment. The adopted RBKC New Local Plan contains no changes of relevance to the ground conditions assessment. The numbering and one title (in PLV2 –Earl’s Court Opportunity Area) of relevant policies changed since their inclusion in the July 2024 ES, but introduce no new considerations for the ground conditions assessment

13.8 For completeness, Strategic Policy ‘CC5 - Water Quality’ within the LBHF Local Plan is also relevant to the ground conditions assessment; but does not introduce any new considerations for the ground conditions assessment

13.9 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

13.10 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

13.11 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2.10N in ES Volume 3A.

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

13.12 The Waterman post-submission review comments have not necessitated amendments to the assessment.

Assessment Scope

13.13 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Characterisation Method

13.14 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

13.15 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

13.16 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the assessment presented in this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

Assessment Criteria

13.17 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

13.18 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Conditions

13.19 Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, existing infrastructure has been utilised and no new infrastructure has been built. Therefore, the baseline conditions as described in the ground conditions assessment of the July 2024 ES remain materially valid as no new uncontrolled potential sources of contamination have been introduced

Assessment of Effects

13.20 The assessment has considered the following proposed amendments:

• Detailed Component Plots layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

• Detailed Component Plot EC06 below ground level depth amendment from 4.8 mAOD to 5 mAOD;

• Outline Component Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

• Outline Component Development Zone O below ground level addition of +1.6 mAOD level across a 300 m2 area;

• Outline Component Development Zone N below ground level extension in area to the west by 1,436 m2;

• Outline Component Development Zone X 0.5 mAOD below ground level extension in area to the west by 344 m2; and

• Total excavation volume increase from 238,165 m3 to 328,941 m3.

2 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan Review. Available at: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/planning-and-buildingcontrol/planning-policy/local-plan [accessed June 2025]

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

13.21 The proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of impacts considered in the July 2024 ES with respect to construction workers, adjacent site users and controlled waters The embedded mitigation (including proposed materials management plan and waste management plans) would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions and would be fully detailed and agreed in consultation with the respective LPAs in accordance with standard practice Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2024 assessment remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

13.22 The proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of impacts considered in the July 2024 ES with respect to construction workers, adjacent site users and controlled waters. The embedded mitigation (including proposed materials management plan and waste management plans) would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions and would be fully detailed and agreed in consultation with the respective LPAs in accordance with standard practice. Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2024 assessment remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

13.23 No additional mitigation is required, and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

13.24 No additional mitigation is required and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

13.25 The summary of residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

13.26 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are presented in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

13.27 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. None of these comments have necessitated changes to the assessment.

13.28 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; below ground and building footprint proposals of the Amended Detailed Component; and below ground and development zone maximum horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component.

13.29 In respect of baseline conditions, no new uncontrolled potential sources of contamination have been introduced within the Site

13.30 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of likely significant ground conditions effects. Accordingly, the summary presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

13.31 No additional or different significant ground conditions effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

14A WATER RESOURCES

Introduction

14.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely water resources effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different likely significant environmental effects to those presented in the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; below ground and building footprint proposals of theAmended Detailed Component; and below ground and development zone maximum horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component

14.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 14: Water Resources and Volume 3, Appendix 14.1: Flood Risk Assessment and Outline Drainage Strategy of the July 2024 ES. These documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

14.3 This chapter is supported by the following technical appendices in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Appendix 14A.1A: Flood Risk Assessment and Outline Drainage Strategy Addendum.

14.4 The introduction as presented the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Methodology

14.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains changes of relevance to the water resources assessment in paragraph 175 This has been considered in this assessment.

14.6 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid. It is confirmed that the London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal (2018)2 has also been considered in the assessment.

14.7 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)3 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking the assessment While minor text updates have been made to the draft policies previously considered, these do not introduce any new considerations for the water resources assessment.

14.8 The following local guidance documents are also relevant and are noted for completeness but do not introduce any new considerations for the water resources assessment:

• RBKC Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2024-20304; and

• RBKC Flood Investigation Report into July 2021 Flooding5

14.9 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid The following guidance documents are also relevant and are noted for completeness but do not introduce any new consideration for the water resources assessment:

• CIRIA C753 The SuDS Manual, 20156;

• CIRIA C635 Designing for exceedance in urban drainage - good practice, 20067; and

• CIRIA C790 Code of practice for property flood resilience, 20218

1 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

2 Greater London Authority (GLA), 2018. London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal. GLA.

3 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan Review. Available at: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/planning-and-building-control/planning-policy/local-plan [accessed June 2025].

4 RBKC, 2023. RBKC Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2024-2030. RBKC

5 RBKC, 2022. RBKC Flood Investigation Report into July 2021 Flooding. RBKC

6 CIRIA, 2015. C753 The SuDS Manual, CIRIA.

Consultation

14.10 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

14.11 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2.10N in ES Volume 3A. In respect of the Thames Water (‘TW’) pre-development capacity enquiry, TW provided a response on 6 January 2025, which is provided in Appendix 14A.1A.

14.12 The RBKC, LBHF and Waterman post-submission review comments have required minor clarification updates to the assessment.

14.13 Post-application submission stakeholder comments on the Flood RiskAssessment and Outline Drainage Strategy were received from the LBHF and RBKC LLFA, GLA and TW. Responses to these comments and assessment updates are presented in Technical Appendix 14A.1A.

Assessment Scope

14.14 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Characterisation Method

14.15 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

14.16 Two document footnotes in the July 2024 assessment were not displayed due to a formatting errors. These are as follows:

• Capita | Aecom, 2016. LBHF Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (‘SFRA’). LBHF; and

• JBA, 2022. RBKC Level 1 SFRA. RBKC.

14.17 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

14.18 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the assessment presented in this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

14.19 The following specific updated/replacement planning documents have been referenced during the preparation of this chapter:

• Replacement Parameter Plans9;

• Integrated Water Management Strategy Addendum10; and

• Sustainability Strategy Addendum11

14.20 In addition, an addendum to the July 2024 FRA and ODS has been prepared and is presented in Technical Appendix 14A.1A.

7 CIRIA, 2006. C635 Designing for exceedance in urban drainage – good practice, CIRIA.

8 CIRIA, 2021. C790 Code of practice for property flood resilience, CIRIA.

9 Hawkins Brown - Studio Egret West Architects, 2025. Earls Court Development Parameter Plans. ECDC

10 WSP, 2024. Earls Court Development Integrated Water Management Strategy. ECDC

11 Hoare Lea, 2025. Earls Court Development Sustainability Strategy Addendum. ECDC

Assessment Criteria

14.21 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

14.22 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Baseline Conditions

14.23 Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, existing infrastructure has been utilised and no newinfrastructure has been built. Therefore, the baseline conditions as described in the water resources assessment of the July 2024 ES remain materially valid as no new infrastructure has been built and drainage regimes are unchanged.

14.24 There have been no changes to the geology, surface water and ground water baseline as described in the July 2024 ES. No new sources of drainage or water supply infrastructure have been introduced.

14.25 In respect of flood risk, the EA updated the Flood Map for Planning12 in March 2025. The latest mapping has been reviewed; however, there is no change to the flood risk information provided within the study area

Sensitive Receptors

14.26 The sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Effects

14.27 The assessment has considered the following proposed amendments:

• Detailed Component Plots layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

• Detailed Component Plot EC06 below ground level depth amendment from 4.8 mAOD to 5 mAOD;

• Outline Component Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

• Outline Component Development Zone O below ground level addition of +1.6 mAOD level across a 300 m2 area;

• Outline Component Development Zone N below ground level extension in area to the west by 1,436 m2;

• Outline Component Development Zone X 0.5 mAOD below ground level extension in area to the west by 344 m2; and

• Total excavation volume increase from 238,165 m3 to 328,941 m3 .

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

14.28 With respect to groundwater flood risk during demolition and construction, the proposed increase in overall basement extents is negligible and increased depth of excavation in Development Zone O is no deeper than excavation elsewhere in the Early Phases, assessed previously as part of the July 2024 ES. Therefore, the proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of impacts considered in the July 2024 ES. The embedded mitigation would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions and would be fully detailed and agreed in consultation with the respective LPAs in accordance with standard practice.Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2024 assessment remain valid.

Completed Development Effects

14.29 With respect to groundwater flood risk for the completed development, the proposed increase in overall basement extents is negligible and the increased depth of excavation in Development Zone O is no deeper than excavation elsewhere in the Early Phases, assessed previously as part of the July 204 ES. Therefore, the proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of impacts considered in the July 2024 ES. The embedded mitigation would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions and would be fully detailed and agreed in consultation

with the respective LPAs in accordance with standard practice. Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2024 assessment remain valid.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

14.30 With respect to groundwater flood risk during demolition and construction, the proposed increase in overall basement extents is negligible and increased depth of excavation in Development Zone O is no deeper than excavation elsewhere in the All Phases, assessed previously as part of the July 2024 ES. Therefore, the proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of impacts considered in the July 2024 ES. The embedded mitigation would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions and would be fully detailed and agreed in consultation with the respective LPAs in accordance with standard practice.Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2024 assessment remain valid.

Completed Development Effects

14.31 With respect to groundwater flood risk for the completed development, the proposed increase in overall basement extents is negligible and the increased depth of excavation in Development Zone O is no deeper than excavation elsewhere in the All Phases, assessed previously as part of the July 204 ES. Therefore, the proposed amendments would not alter the nature and magnitude of impacts considered in the July 2024 ES. The embedded mitigation would be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions and would be fully detailed and agreed in consultation with the respective LPAs in accordance with standard practice. Accordingly, the conclusions of the July 2024 assessment remain valid.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

14.1 No additional mitigation is required, and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

14.2 No additional mitigation is required and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

14.32 The summary of residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

14.33 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for theAmended Proposed Development and are presented in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Inter-Project Effects

Early Phases

14.34 There are no material changes to the list of cumulative schemes which would alter the inter-project cumulative effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES. Accordingly, the demolition and construction and completed development

cumulative effects for the Early Phases development scenario as presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

14.35 As outlined in ES Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the Mund Street School site scheme, summarised below. The findings of this assessment are consistent with those outlined in the July 2024 ES, therefore the conclusions drawn from these findings, as presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid.

14.36 Standard environmental protection measures and controls that would be in place during demolition and construction would mitigate the potential for cumulative effects in respect of flood risk, surface water, and groundwater. Temporary potable water demand and foul water generation rates during demolition and construction would not be substantial and would not have the potential for cumulative effects.

14.37 For the completed development, proposals for the Mund Street School site scheme:

• Do not impact off-site fluvial / tidal flood risk, therefore no cumulative effects are likely;

• Include a policy compliant SuDS strategy, which would help reduce surface water and sewer flood risk, improve surface water run-off quality and reduce pressures on the local drainage network, therefore providing beneficial cumulative effects;

• Include a policy compliant SuDS strategy, and whilst the implementation of which would help improve the quality of surface water, surface water within the study area drains via the TW combined sewer network such that the scale of effect would be negligible due to the low sensitivity of the receptor;

• Would now have been accounted for in TW network capacity planning, therefore no cumulative effects are likely with respect to water supply infrastructure; and

• Do not include proposals to dispose of surface water via infiltration, therefore no cumulative effects are likely with regards to groundwater quality and quantity.

14.38 The completed development at the Mund Street School site scheme is not expected to result in significant cumulative effects. Policy-compliant SuDS measures provide beneficial impacts on the surrounding drainage network, while no adverse effects are anticipated on flood risk, water supply, or groundwater.

All Phases

14.39 There are no material changes to the list of cumulative schemes which would alter the inter-project cumulative effects previously reported within the July 2024 ES Accordingly the demolition and construction and completed development cumulative effects for the All Phases development scenario as presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

14.40 As outlined in ES Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology, a qualitative assessment has been undertaken of the Mund Street School site scheme The findings of this assessment are consistent with those outlined in the July 2024 ES, therefore the conclusions drawn from these findings, as presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid.

14.41 Standard environmental protection measures and controls that would be in place during demolition and construction would mitigate the potential for cumulative effects in respect of flood risk, surface water, and groundwater. Temporary potable water demand and foul water generation rates during demolition and construction would not be substantial and would not have the potential for cumulative effects.

14.42 For the completed development, proposals for the Mund Street School site scheme:

• Do not impact off-site fluvial / tidal flood risk, therefore no cumulative effects are likely;

• Include a policy compliant SuDS strategy, which would help reduce surface water and sewer flood risk, improve surface water run-off quality and reduce pressures on the local drainage network, therefore providing beneficial cumulative effects;

• Include a policy compliant SuDS strategy, and whilst the implementation of which would help improve the quality of surface water, surface water within the study area drains via the TW combined sewer network such that the scale of effect would be negligible due to the low sensitivity of the receptor;

• Would now have been accounted for in TW network capacity planning, therefore no cumulative effects are likely with respect to water supply infrastructure; and

13 GOV.UK, 2025. Flood Map for Planning - GOV.UK. [online] Service.gov.uk. Available at: https://flood-map-for-planning.service.gov.uk [Accessed 12 June 2025]

• Do not include proposals to dispose of surface water via infiltration, therefore no cumulative effects are likely with regards to groundwater quality and quantity.

14.43 The completed development at the Mund Street School site scheme is not expected to result in significant cumulative effects. Policy-compliant SuDS measures provide beneficial impacts on the surrounding drainage network, while no adverse effects are anticipated on flood risk, water supply, or groundwater.

Summary ofAssessment

Post-Application Submission

14.44 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required minor clarification updates to the assessment.

14.45 Post-application submission stakeholder comments on the Flood RiskAssessment and Outline Drainage Strategy were received from the LBHF and RBKC LLFA, GLA and Thames Water . Responses to these comments and assessment updates are presented in Technical Appendix 14A.1A.

14.3 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; below ground and building footprint proposals of the Amended Detailed Component; and below ground and development zone maximum horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component.

14.46 In respect of baseline conditions, there have been no changes to the geology, surface water and ground water baseline. No new sources of drainage orwater supply infrastructure have been introduced. In respect of flood risk, the EAupdated the Flood Map for Planning13 in March 2025. The latest mapping has been reviewed; however, there is no change to the flood risk information provided within the Study Area.

14.47 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES conclusions remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development in respect of likely ground conditions effects. Accordingly, the summary presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

14.48 Consideration of a potential cumulative scheme at the Mund Street School site has concluded that no inter-project cumulative effects are likely to arise on the basis that standard practice mitigation measures (CEMP, SuDS strategy and FRA) are adopted and secured.

14.49 No additional or different significant ground conditions effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

15A DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT, OVERSHADOWING, SOLAR GLARE AND LIGHT SPILL

Introduction

15.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessments examine whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill assessments of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development In particular, the assessments consider the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building footprints and height of the Amended Detailed Component; and the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component

15.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 15: Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Pollution and Volume 3, Technical Appendices 15.1-15.13 of the July 2024 ES The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required. In respect of the chapter, context and validation text are shown in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

15.3 This chapter is supported by the following amended Technical Appendices in ES Volume 3A Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Technical Appendix 15A 5A: Amended Scenario Overviews;

• Technical Appendix 15A 6A: Amended Daylight and Sunlight Results;

• Technical Appendix 15A.8A: Amended Window Maps;

• Technical Appendix 15A.9A: Amended No Sky Line Contours; and

• Technical Appendix 15A.13A: Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing Contextual Report Technical Addendum

15.4 All other technical appendices of the July 2024 ES remain valid.

15.5 The introductory text presented in the July 2024 ES remains materially valid.

Methodology

15.6 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill assessment.

15.7 The RBKC’s New Local Plan (2024)2 adopted on 24 July 2024 has been reviewed and does not introduce any additional considerations for the daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill assessments

15.8 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

15.9 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

15.10 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. In addition, RBKC appointed Consil and LBHF appointed Schroeders Begg to technically peer review the daylight and sunlight aspects of the July 2024 ES. These are provided in Technical Appendix 2A.10N in ES Volume 3A.

15.11 The post-submission review comments have required the following changes to the assessment:

• Removal of one receptor which has been identified as containing non-residential uses and is therefore not relevant for daylight assessment;

• Improvement of daylight effects to two receptors were recommended, which has resulted in a reduction in massing to Plot WK02. These two receptors have been re-assessed. For one of these two receptors, updated baseline information (i.e. floorplans and/or room uses) have also been obtained;

• A further 19 daylight and 18 sunlight receptors have been re-assessed where updated or different baseline information (i.e floorplans and/or room uses) have been obtained; and

• Correction of an error at one receptor identified in the July 2024 ES.

15.12 The post-submission reviews undertaken by RBKC, LBHF, Consil and Schroeders Begg did not have any further comments on the remaining receptors assessed in the July 2024 ES.

Assessment Scope

15.13 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development The July 2024 assessment considered a total of 438 existing daylight receptors and 271 existing sunlight receptors Of these totals, 415 daylight receptors and 250 sunlight receptors remain valid based on a qualitative review of the proposed amendments and application of professional judgement. The assessment presented within this addendum has therefore focussed on the quantitative re-assessment of the remaining 22 daylight and 21 sunlight receptors for the Early Phases and All Phases and the removal of one receptor due to being identified as non-residential.. Table 15A.1N presents all 22 receptors setting out the reasons for re-assessment

15.14 Additionally, the overshadowing, solar glare and light spillage assessment scope of the July 2024 ES remains valid

Table 15A.1N: Summary of Re-assessed Existing Sensitive Daylight and Sunlight Receptors

Ref. Daylight and Sunlight Receptors

Reason for Re-Assessment Reduction to Plot WK02

Updated floorplans and/or uses

Error in the July 2024 3D model

3 Flats 1–10 Kensington Hall Gardens Plot WK02 has been amended to improve daylight results to this property. ✓ x x

4 Flats 11–20 Kensington Hall Gardens

Floorplans secured showed that one room (R1) on each floor of this building have been removed from the assessment as they serve Flats 21–35 Kensington Hall Gardens. x ✓ x

1 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

2 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan. RBKC.

Table 15A.1N: Summary of Re-assessed Existing Sensitive Daylight and Sunlight Receptors

Ref. Daylight and Sunlight Receptors

5 Flats 21–35 Kensington Hall Gardens

6 Flats 36–45 Kensington Hall Gardens

7 Flats 46–55 Kensington Hall Gardens

82 West Kensington Court, Edith Villas

Floorplans secured and incorporated into the 3D model since the July 2024 ES.

No change to floorplans from the July 2024 submission. Although floorplans were modelled, No sky line (NSL) results were omitted due to uncertainty regarding room uses, which have been confirmed.

Plot WK02 has been amended to improve daylight results. Although floorplans were submitted in the July 2024 ES, NSL results were omitted due to room use uncertainty and have now been now confirmed

Floorplans for Flat 73 secured and, where applicable, replicated for the remaining flats.

83 Whiteley’s Cottages Floorplans secured and incorporated into the 3D model since the July 2024 submission.

84 Flats 1–30 Falkland House, Edith Villas Floorplans for Flats 1, 18, and 20 secured and, where applicable, replicated for the remaining flats.

87 17 Mornington Avenue Floorplans secured and incorporated into the 3D model since the July 2024 submission ES.

88 19 Mornington Avenue Floorplans secured and incorporated into the 3D model since the July 2024 ES.

89 21–35 Mornington Avenue Floorplans for 25 Mornington Avenue secured and, where applicable, replicated for the remaining flats.

99 101–130 Gibbs Green Floorplans for Flats 102, 110, 111, and 128 secured and, where applicable, replicated for the remaining flats.

100 147–160 Gibbs Green (daylight only) Floorplans for Flats 102, 110, 111, and 128 secured and, where applicable, replicated for the remaining flats.

117 1 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable.

118 2 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable.

95 3 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable.

119 4 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable.

Table 15A.1N: Summary of Re-assessed Existing Sensitive Daylight and Sunlight Receptors

Ref. Daylight and Sunlight Receptors

Reason for Re-Assessment Reduction to Plot WK02

120 5 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable. x

121 6 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable.

122 7 Garsdale Terrace Floorplans secured and incorporated into the model since the July 2024 ES, resulting in the removal of rooms which are now confirmed as non-habitable.

240 Flats 1–88 – Fairburn House An error in the NSL results for the 9th floor has been identified since the July 2024 ES and has been corrected in this addendum.

360 42 Philbeach Gardens Planning permission (Ref: PP/21/03372) for basement-level alterations was granted in August 2021. Due to foliage, it was unclear at the time of undertaking the July 2024 ES whether the alterations were implemented. This has now been confirmed by the occupiers, and the 3D model has been updated accordingly. The whole building has been reassessed in line with the July 2024 ES assessment, with commentary provided where changes to the basement flat occur

Baseline Characterisation Method

15.15 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

15.16 Following post-submission consultation with Consil and Schroeders Begg, further floorplan and room use information was obtained for receptors set out in Table 15A.1N The floorplans and room uses at these properties were previously based on assumed floorplans and assumed or unknown room uses This updated information has been included in the 3D model of these properties in order to update the baseline daylight and sunlight assessments.

15.17 In addition, further information provided determined that 177 Northend Road, which was assessed as a receptor for daylight and sunlight, does not comprise residential uses. As such, this receptor should be disregarded from further consideration

15.18 Window maps for St Cuthbert’s Church and Clergy House at 50 Philbeach Gardens which were omitted from the July 2024 ES have been included for completeness in Technical Appendix 15A.8A.

15.19 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

15.20 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the assessment reported within this addendum has been based on the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description

15.21 Quantitative daylight and sunlight modelling and re-assessment of the 22 receptors has been undertaken based on the 3D model of the Amended Proposed Development for the Early Phases and All Phases development scenarios The

existing and completed development stage daylight and sunlight levels at the 22 receptors are presented in Technical Appendix 15A.5A and 15A.6A in ES Volume 3A and should be read in conjunction with Technical Appendix 15.5 and 15.6 (not 15.4 as erroneously referred to) in the July 2024 ES.

15.22 Qualitative assessment of overshadowing, solar glare and light spill effects have been undertaken for the Early Phases and All Phases development scenario.

15.23 The cumulative assessment method as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, an additional scheme at Mund Street School site scheme has been considered qualitatively.

Assessment Criteria

15.24 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. This addendum should be read in conjunction with Technical Appendices 15.13 and 15A.13A.

Assumptions and Limitations

15.25 Technical Appendix 15.3 of the July 2024 ES lists properties where floorplans have been obtained. The floorplans and room uses at the 20 of the 22 properties listed in Table 15A.1N were previously based on assumed floorplans and room uses; however, have been updated based on floorplans and information secured

15.26 All other assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Sensitive Receptors

Existing Receptors

15.27 The sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of 177 Northend Road which has been removed Therefore, there are a total of 437 existing daylight receptors and 271 sunlight receptors. The removal of 177 Northend Road was not relevant for sunlight assessment in the 2024 ES and so there is no change to the total number of existing sunlight receptors.

Future Receptors

15.28 The future receptors set out in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However, the Mund Street School site scheme is a new future sensitive receptor and has been qualitatively considered in relation to daylight and sunlight effects.

Existing Baseline

Daylight and Sunlight

15.29 The existing daylight and sunlight receptors presented in the July 2024 ES, remain valid, with the exception of the 20 receptors where floorplans and room uses have been secured and one receptor which has been removed from the assessment

15.30 At the 20 existing daylight and 19 existing receptors where updated baseline information has been modelled, the baseline daylight (VSC and NSL) and sunlight (APSH and WPSH) assessment would see a marginal difference in overall compliance rates across all windows and rooms from the July 2024 ES for these properties. The updated baseline daylight and sunlight values for these properties are presented in Appendix 15.5A. The updated baseline daylight and sunlight values are presented in Appendix 15A.5A. The existing baseline conditions for the remaining 415 receptors as presented in the July 2024 chapter remain valid for daylight and sunlight.

15.31 In relation to daylight, within the total 437 residential, religious and hotel receptors for VSC, 3,828 of the 6955 (55 %) windows would meet the BRE recommendation of 27 % in the existing baseline condition. For sunlight, of the total 271 receptors 1,925 of the 2,297 (84%) rooms would meet the BRE recommendations for APSH and WPSH.

Overshadowing

15.32 The existing receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Future Baseline

15.33 The future baseline as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

15.34 The cumulative scheme at Mund Street School site contains residential uses and is therefore considered a future receptor to daylight and sunlight. Given its undetermined planning status, this future receptor has been qualitatively reviewed.

Assessment of Effects

15.35 The assessment has considered the following relevant proposed amendments:

• Detailed Component:

Amended Plot layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

Introduction of additional balconies at Plot EC05 levels 01 and 02 and a terrace at level 07;

De minimus height increase at Plots EC05 and EC06; and

Amended GEA floorspace for each proposed building.

• Outline Component:

Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

Development Zone F (Plot EC03) maximum building height reduction from 71.3 mAOD to 67.8 mAOD (3.5 m);

Development Zone X (Plot WK02) massing setback to the north (23.2 mAOD by 0.5 m; 28.1 mAOD by 4.5 m; 31.4 mAOD by 3.6 m);

Site access points into and through the Site, in particular the removal of vehicular access from Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue with the exception of emergency access and addition of potential pedestrian and cycle accesses from A4 West Cromwell Road and from the Site to Cluny Mews;

Amendment of Land Use parameter plans to provide clarity within each Development Zone, to improve alignment with Development Specification, to add Hotel use within Development Zone K; to allow for ancillary floorspace within Development Zones; and

Amendment of assumed minimum and maximum land use areas.

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

15.36 For the Early Phases, the worst-case scenario in terms of daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill effects is represented by the completed Amended Proposed Development. On this basis, and considering the minor scale of proposed amendments to the Early Phases, the demolition and construction effects for the Early Phases presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Completed Development Effects

15.37 For the purpose of the Early Phases daylight, sunlight and overshadowing assessments, only massing and footprint changes are of relevance to surrounding receptors. In relation to solar glare and light spill, the façade treatment and lighting design of the Detailed Component are relevant.

Daylight

15.38 Of the 437 total existing receptors, 22 receptors have been re-assessed. The daylight assessments for the remaining 415 sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases.

15.39 The amended daylight results for the 22 receptors re-assessed forthe Early Phases are presented in Technical Appendix 15A.6A and summarised in Table 15A.12A.

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Chapter 15A: Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill

15.40 Of the 22 receptors, 20 experienced Negligible (BRE Compliant) or Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects in the July 2024 ES and see no change to the overall effects for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, these 20 receptors have not been discussed further. 15.41 Further discussion has been provided for the remaining two receptors

Table 15A.12A: Amended Early Phases Summary of Completed Development Daylight Results

Address

3

4

5

6

7

Flats 1-88 Fairburn House

15.42 An error has been identified in the July 2024 NSL assessment and is corrected in this addendum.

15.43 With the inclusion of the correct NSL results, all windows and rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria for both VSC and NSL and so are considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.44 Overall, the effect is reduced to Negligible (BRE Compliant) This is due to the inclusion of the floorplans for the NSL assessment and is an improvement when compared to the July 2024 conclusion of Negligible Adverse

42 Philbeach Gardens

15.45 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate floorplans for two rooms at basement level The basement comprises a bedroom and LKD. Therefore, all 18 windows and a total of 6 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.46 For VSC, 10 of the 18 (55.6 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect.

15.47 Of the eight affected windows, two would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and six would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse effect, of which one serves the basement LKD.

15.48 For NSL, five of the six (83.3 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

Table 15A.13A: Amended Early Phases Summary of Completed Development Sunlight Results

3

4

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement

15.49 The affected room is the basement LKD and would see an alteration in NSL greater than 40 %. However, this basement room is single aspect and deeper than 5 meters and so a disproportionate change to NSL occurs. The BRE Guidance states that for rooms greater than 5 m deep, a greater movement of the no sky line may be unavoidable

15.50 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Minor to Moderate Adverse (significant), which is unchanged from the July 2024 ES. However this receptor would now substantially meet the alternative target compared to the July 2024 ES, where this receptor met the alternative target This is because the NSL assessment was not previously included due to absence of floorplans available.

Sunlight

15.51 Of the 271 total receptors, 21 receptors have been re-assessed The sunlight assessment for the remaining 250 sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases.

15.52 The amended sunlight results for the 21 receptors re-assessed forthe Early Phases are presented in Technical Appendix 15A.6A and summarised in Table 15A.13A.

15.53 Of the 21 re-assessed receptors, 20 experienced Negligible (BRE Compliant) effects in the July 2024 ES and would continue to see Negligible effects for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, these 20 receptors have not been discussed further.

15.54 Further discussion has been provided for the remaining receptor

42 Philbeach Gardens

15.55 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate floorplans at basement level. A total of 10 rooms, of which one is the basement LKD, were re-assessed for sunlight.

15.56 Six of the 10 (50 %) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.57 For Annual PSH, two rooms would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse effect, of which one is the basement LKD. The remaining room would experience alterations would be greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.58 For Winter PSH, all four rooms affected would experience alterations greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect.

15.59 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Moderate to Major Adverse (significant). This property continues to fall beyond the alternative target criteria, which is generally a result of the existing architecture (self-obstruction or restrictive neighbouring buildings)

Overshadowing

15.60 A review of the Amended Proposed Development has been undertaken in relation to the location of where alterations to the Early Phases massing have been proposed to surrounding sensitive outdoor amenity areas.

15.61 Given the minimal nature of the massing changes which are limited to reductions to the massing parameters at Outline Component Plots WK02 and EC03 and the relative distance and minimal nature of massing and footprint changes to Detailed Component Plots WB04, WB05, EC04 and EC05, which are located somewhat centrally to the Site and at a relative distance from surrounding amenity areas, the overall effect conclusions would be unchanged. As such, the overshadowing assessment and conclusion of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

Solar Glare

15.62 A review of the Amended Proposed Development’s revised façade designs for the Early Phases has been undertaken to determine the extent of changes the location of solid and reflective elements on the Detailed Component plots which may give rise to different solar glare effects.

15.63 The windows and balconies at Plots WB04, WB05 and EC05 have been revised to accommodate internal floorplan changes. There is potential for minimal changes to instances of reflection occurring at slightly different times of day and year from the surrounding viewpoints assessed in the July 2024 ES. However, the overall façade design principles and general proportion of glazed to solid materiality are unchanged and there continues to be no large areas of highly reflective materials proposed, which could give rise to long periods of solar glare.

15.64 Therefore, whilst the pattern of potential reflections may be slightly different, it is not considered to result in any different or additional significant effects. As such, the solar glare assessment and conclusions of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

Light Spill

15.65 A review of the Amended Proposed Development commercial uses within the Early Phases, from which there is the potential for light spill effects upon residential receptors, has been undertaken to determine whether any of the revised proposals of the Amended Proposed Development for the Early Phases plots would be likely to give rise to different or new light spill effects. The commercial retail uses continue to be located on the lower levels of Plots WB04, EC05 and EC06. There is no material change in light spill terms to the separation distance from Plots WB04, EC05 and EC06 to surrounding residential receptors meaning that there would be no new or different effects from these commercial areas would occur to the nearby receptors. As such, the light spill assessment and Negligible (BRE Compliant) conclusions of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

15.66 For the All Phases, the worst-case scenario in terms of daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, solar glare and light spill effects is represented by the completed Amended Proposed Development. Therefore, and considering the minor scale of proposed amendments to the All Phases, the demolition and construction effects for the All Phases presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Completed Development Effects

15.67 For the purpose of the All Phases daylight, sunlight and overshadowing assessments, only massing and footprint changes are of relevance to surrounding receptors. In relation to solar glare and light spill, the façade treatment and lighting design Detailed Component are relevant.

Daylight

15.68 Of the total existing 437 receptors, 22 receptors have been re-assessed. The daylight results for the remaining 415 sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

15.69 The amended daylight results for the 22 receptors re-assessed for the All Phases are presented in Technical Appendix 15A.6A and summarised in Table 15A.15A.

15.70 Of the 22 receptors, four experienced Negligible (BRE Compliant) effects in the July 2024 ES and would see no change to the overall effects for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, these four receptors have not been discussed further.

15.71 Further discussion has been provided for the remaining 18 receptors

Table 15A.15A: Amended All Phases Summary of Completed Development Daylight Results

15.72 Due to the proposed massing reductions at Plot WK02, this receptor has been re-assessed The results demonstrate an improvement in VSC and NSL as described below.

15.73 For VSC, 58 of the 109 (53.2 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.74 Of the 51 affected windows, 14 would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and 14 would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining 23 windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.75 For NSL, 39 of the 59 (66.1 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.76 Of the 20 affected rooms, six would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect whilst 14 would experience an alteration greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse Effect

15.77 Whilst there are instances of VSC and NSL improvements, the overall effect is unchanged from the July 2024 ES and therefore remains Major Adverse (significant). However, due to the reduction in massing, this property now meets the alternative target criteria.

Flats 11-20 Kensington Hall Gardens

15.78 As a result of securing floorplans for this property, five windows serving non habitable rooms were removed from the assessment Therefore, a total of 47 windows serving 38 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

Flats 1-10 Kensington Hall Gardens

15.79 For VSC, 23 of the 47 (48.9 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.80 Of the 24 affected windows, five would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and eight would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining 11 windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.81 For NSL, 27 of the 38 (71.1 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.82 Of the 11 affected rooms, three would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and three would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining five rooms would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect.

15.83 Whilst there are isolated VSC improvements, the overall effect is unchanged from the July 2024 ES, which remains Major Adverse (significant). A typographical error in the July 2024 ES has been identified, where it is stated ‘Meets alternative target’ which should have been ‘Substantially meets alternative target’. The conclusion was correctly referenced elsewhere in the application and has now been corrected in Table 15A.15A

Flats 21-35 Kensington Hall Gardens

15.84 As a result of securing floorplans for this property, six windows were removed from the assessment as they serve nonhabitable spaces. NSL was previously not assessed as the room uses were not available; however, having obtained the floorplans, an NSL assessment has been undertaken Therefore, a total of 54 windows serving 43 rooms have been reassessed for daylight within this building.

15.85 For VSC, 29 of the 54 (53.7 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.86 Of the 25 affected windows, 12 would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and nine would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining four windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.87 For NSL, 30 of the 43 (69.8 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.88 Of the 13 affected rooms, seven would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and three would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining three rooms would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.89 Overall, the effect is considered Moderate to Major Adverse (significant). This is a worsening of previously reported Moderate Adverse effects. The property now substantially meets the alternative target due to the updated floorplans and inclusion of the NSL results, whereas in the July 2024 ES, the effect was assessed as meeting alternative target criteria.

Flats 36-45 Kensington Hall Gardens

15.90 Room uses were secured enabling an NSL assessment to be undertaken for this property. Therefore, a total of 46 windows serving 20 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.91 The VSC as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid with all windows re-assessed meeting BRE's criteria.

15.92 For NSL, 18 of the 20 (90 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.93 Of the two affected rooms, both would experience an alteration in NSL greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect These rooms are deeper than 5 m and so percentage changes of this scale can be anticipated.

15.94 Overall, the effect is considered Negligible Adverse (not significant), compared to the previous Negligible (BRE Compliant) effect reported in the July 2024 ES

Flats 46-55 Kensington Hall Gardens

15.95 Due to the proposed massing reductions at Plot WK02, this receptor has been re-assessed. Floorplans have been secured and included in the model for this property enabling an NSL assessment to be undertaken. Therefore, a total of 85 windows serving 32 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.96 For VSC, 45 of the 85 (52.9 %) windows re-assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.97 Of the 40 affected windows, 11 would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and 15 would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining 14 windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.98 For NSL, 17 of the 32 (53.1 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.99 Of the 15 affected rooms, four would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and five would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect

15.100 The remaining six rooms would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.101 Whilst there are isolated VSC improvements, the effect is considered to remain Major Adverse (significant). However, as a result of the massing reduction at Plot WK02, this property would now meet the alternative target criteria.

West Kensington Court - Edith Villas

15.102 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate updated floorplans, enabling an NSL assessment, and remove windows serving non-habitable rooms from the assessment Therefore, 50 windows have been removed from the assessment. A total of 254 windows serving 31 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.103 For VSC, 211 of the 254 (83.1%) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.104 Of the 43 affected windows, 22 would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and 12 would experience an alteration between 30-39.9% which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining nine windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.105 For NSL, 28 of the 31 (90.3%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.106 Of the three affected rooms, all would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect

15.107 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Moderate to Major Adverse (significant) and meet the alternative target.

Whiteley’s Cottages

15.108 Floorplans have been secured enabling an NSL assessment. Therefore, a total of 31 windows serving 12 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.109 There is no change to the VSC assessment presented in the July 2024 ES which remains valid.

15.110 For NSL, all rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and so are considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.111 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Moderate Adverse (significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES reported effect of Moderate to Major Adverse (significant) This is due to the NSL compliance based on known floorplans. This property continues to meet the alternative target criteria.

Flats 1-30 - Falkland House - Edith Villas

15.112 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate updated floorplans enabling an NSL assessment to be undertaken A total of 112 windows serving 68 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.113 For VSC, 43 of the 112 (38.4%) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.114 Of the 69 affected windows, 36 would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and 23 would experience an alteration between 30-39.9% which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining 10 windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.115 For NSL, 64 of the 68 (94.1%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.116 Of the four affected rooms, all would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect

15.117 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Moderate to Major Adverse (significant) and meet the alternative target.

19 Mornington Avenue

15.118 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate updated floorplans. A total of 19 windows serving three rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.119 There is no change to the VSC or NSL assessment as presented in the July 2024 ES which remains valid

15.120 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Minor Adverse (not significant).

21-35 Mornington Avenue

15.121 Floorplans have been secured enabling an NSL assessment to be undertaken A total of 38 windows serving 24 rooms were re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.122 There is no change to the VSC assessment as presented in the July 2024 ES which remains valid.

15.123 For NSL, 18 of the 24 (75 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.124 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Moderate Adverse (significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES reported effect of Moderate to Major Adverse (significant). This is due to the NSL compliance based on known floorplans. This property continues to meet the alternative target criteria.

101-130 Gibbs Green

15.125 Floorplans have been secured enabling an NSL assessment to be undertaken. The floorplans confirmed 36 fewer windows are relevant for VSC assessment. A total of 74 windows serving 74 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.126 For VSC, 39 of the 74 (52.7 %) windows re-assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.127 Of the 35 affected windows, three would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and 25 would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining seven windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.128 For NSL, all rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and so are considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.129 Whilst there are improvements in the level of VSC impacts, the effect is considered to remain Moderate Adverse (significant) which is unchanged from the July 2024 ES reported effect However, this property now meets the alternative target criteria, whereas in the July 2024 ES, the effect was assessed as being beyond alternative target criteria.

147-160 Gibbs Green

15.130 Floorplans have been secured enabling an NSL assessment to be undertaken. The floorplans confirmed 20 fewer windows are relevant for VSC assessment. Therefore, a total of 28 windows serving 28 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.131 For VSC, 10 of the 28 (35.7 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.132 Of the 18 affected windows, four would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect whilst 14 would experience an alteration greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse Effect However, all these 14 windows serve kitchens less than 13 m2 and are considered non-habitable by LBHF due to their size

15.133 For NSL, all rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and so are considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.134 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Minor Adverse (not significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES where the effect was Major Adverse (significant). Furthermore, this property now meets the alternative target criteria

6 Garsdale Terrace

15.135 Floorplans have been secured enabling precise NSL assessment to be undertaken. The floorplans confirmed that one window previously assessed serve a non-habitable room and has therefore been removed from the assessment. A total of eight windows serving five rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.136 For VSC, four of the eight (50%) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.137 Of the four affected windows, all would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect

15.138 For NSL, four of the five (80%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect.

15.139 The affected room would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect

15.140 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Minor Adverse (not significant).

7 Garsdale Terrace

15.141 Floorplans have been secured enabling precise NSL assessment to be undertaken. These floorplans confirmed that one window previously assessed serve a non-habitable room and has therefore been removed from the assessment. Therefore, a total of nine windows serving five rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.142 For VSC, four of the nine (44.4 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.143 Of the five affected windows, one would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and three would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining window would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.144 For NSL, three of the five (60 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.145 Of the two affected rooms, one would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect whilst one would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect

15.146 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Moderate Adverse (significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES where the effect was Moderate to Major Adverse (significant). Furthermore, this property now meets the alternative target criteria, whereas in the July 2024 ES, the effect was concluded to be beyond alternative target criteria.

Flats 1-88 Fairburn House

15.147 An error has been identified in the July 2024 NSL assessment and is corrected in this addendum. There are no changes to the number of windows and rooms assessed and therefore, a total of 190 windows serving 179 rooms have been reassessed for daylight within this building.

15.148 The VSC assessment as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. For NSL, all rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and so are considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.149 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Minor Adverse (not significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES where the effect was Moderate to Major Adverse (significant). Furthermore, this property now meets the

alternative target criteria, whereas in the July 2024 ES, the effect was concluded to substantially meet the alternative target criteria.

42 Philbeach Gardens

15.150 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate floorplans for two rooms at basement level. The basement comprises a bedroom and LKD. A total of 18 windows and 6 rooms have been re-assessed for daylight within this building.

15.151 For VSC, two of the 18 (11.1 %) windows assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect.

15.152 Of the 16 affected windows, two would experience an alteration in VSC between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect. A further 12 would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse effect, of which one serves the basement LKD. The remaining two windows would experience an alteration in excess of 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect.

15.153 For NSL, four of the six (66.7 %) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.154 One of these affected rooms which is an assumed bedroom on the third floor would experience an alteration in NSL between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect. The second affected room is the basement LKD and

would see an alteration in NSL greater than 40 %. However, this basement room is single aspect and deeper than 5 meters and so a disproportionate change to NSL occurs. The BRE Guidance states that for rooms greater than 5 m deep, a greater movement of the no sky line may be unavoidable

15.155 Overall, the effect is considered Moderate to Major Adverse (significant), compared to Moderate Adverse effect reported in the July 2024 ES. This is due to the inclusion of the NSL assessment. This property continues to substantially meet the alternative target criteria.

Sunlight

15.156 Of the total 271 receptors, the sunlight results for 250 sensitive receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid.

15.157 The amended sunlight results for the 21 receptors re-assessed for All Phases are included inTechnical Appendix 15A 6A and summarised in Table 15A.16A.

15.158 Of the 21 re-assessed receptors, 12 experienced Negligible (BRE Compliant) effects in the July 2024 ES and would continue to see Negligible (BRE Compliant) or Negligible Adverse (not significant) effects for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, these 12 receptors have not been discussed further.

15.159 Further discussion has been provided for the remaining nine receptors. Table 15A 16A: Amended All Phases Summary of Completed Development Sunlight Results

3

Table 15A 16A: Amended All Phases Summary of Completed Development Sunlight Results

Flats 1-10- Kensington Hall Gardens

15.160 Due to the proposed massing reductions at Plot WK02, this receptor has been re-assessed. The results demonstrate an improvement in VSC and NSL as described below.

15.161 A total of 39 rooms have been re-assessed for sunlight within this building of which 30 (76.9%) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.162 For Annual PSH, 33 of the 39 (84.6%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.163 Of the six rooms affected annually, three would experience an alteration in Annual PSH between 30-39.9% which is considered a Moderate Adverse effect whilst three would experience an alteration in excess of 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.164 For Winter PSH, 31 of the 39 (79.5%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.165 Of the eight rooms affected in the winter, one would experience an alteration in Winter PSH between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and one would experience an alteration between 30-39.9% which is considered a Moderate Adverse Effect. The remaining six rooms would experience an alteration in excess of 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect.

15.166 Whilst there are instances of APSH and WPSH improvements, the overall effect is unchanged from the July 2024 ES and therefore remains Moderate Adverse (significant) and continues to meet the alternative target criteria

Flats 11-20 - Kensington Hall Gardens

15.167 As a result of securing further floorplans, this receptor has been re-assessed A total of 11 rooms have been re-assessed for sunlight within this building of which 10 (90.9%) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.168 For Annual PSH, 10 of the 11 (90.9%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect. The remaining room sees a loss between 20-29.9% which is considered a Minor Adverse effect

15.169 For Winter PSH, 10 of the 11 (90.9%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect. The remaining room sees a loss greater than 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.170 Overall, the effect would remain Minor Adverse (not significant), which is unchanged from the July 2024 ES

Flats 21-35

- Kensington Hall Gardens

15.171 As a result of securing floorplans for this property, four rooms were removed from the assessment as they serve nonhabitable spaces. Therefore, three rooms are relevant for assessment.

15.172 All three rooms would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.173 Overall, the effect is considered to remain Negligible (BRE Compliant), which is unchanged from the July 2024 ES

West Kensington Court - Edith Villas

15.174 As a result of securing floorplans for this property, 41 rooms were removed from the assessment as they serve nonhabitable spaces. Therefore, 154 rooms are relevant for assessment.

15.175 153 of the 154 (99.4 %) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.176 For Annual PSH, the affected room sees a loss greater than 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect. All rooms would meet the criteria for Winter PSH. The availability of floorplans confirms that the affected room is a bedroom, which the BRE considers of lower importance and not necessary to analyse for sunlight.

15.177 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Negligible Adverse (not significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES where the effect was Minor Adverse (not significant).

Whiteley Cottages

15.178 As a result of securing floorplans for this property, five rooms were removed from the assessment as they serve nonhabitable spaces. Therefore, 12 rooms are relevant for assessment.

15.179 All 12 rooms would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.180 Overall, the effect is considered to be Negligible (not significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES where the effect was Minor Adverse

Flats 1-30 - Falkland House - Edith Villas

15.181 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate updated floorplans. 70 rooms remain relevant for re-assessment.

15.182 65 of the 70 (92.9%) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.183 For Annual PSH, 68 of the 70 (97%) rooms assessed would meet BRE’s criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.184 The two rooms affected annually would experience an alteration in excess of 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.185 For Winter PSH, 65 of the 80 (92.9%) rooms assessed would meet BRE’s criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect

15.186 The five rooms affected in the winter would experience an alteration in excess of 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.187 The availability of floorplans confirms that all of the affected rooms are bedroom, which the BRE considers of lower importance and not necessary to analyse for sunlight.

15.188 Overall, the effect is considered to reduce to Negligible Adverse (not significant), which is an improvement from the July 2024 ES where the effect was Moderate Adverse (significant).

17 Mornington Avenue

15.189 A total of eight rooms have been re-assessed for sunlight within this building of which 6 (75%) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.190 For Annual PSH, all rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and so are considered to experience a Negligible effect.

15.191 For Winter PSH, six of the eight (75%) rooms assessed would meet BRE's criteria and are therefore considered to experience a Negligible effect. The remaining two see losses greater than 40% which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.192 Overall, the effect would remain Moderate Adverse (not significant), which is unchanged from the July 2024 ES.

3-7 Garsdale Terrace

15.193 Floorplans secured for these five properties confirmed that one window at each, which had previously been assessed, serves a non-habitable room and has therefore been removed from the assessment.

15.194 All rooms at these five properties would continue to meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.195 Overall, the effects to these five properties would remain Negligible (BRE Compliant), which is unchanged from the July 2024 ES.

42 Philbeach Gardens

15.196 This receptor has been re-assessed to incorporate floorplans basement level. A total of 10 rooms, of which one is the basement LKD, were re-assessed for sunlight.

15.197 Five of the 10 (50 %) would meet the BRE's criteria for both Annual and Winter PSH.

15.198 For Annual PSH, one room would experience an alteration between 20-29.9 % which is considered a Minor Adverse effect and two rooms would experience an alteration between 30-39.9 % which is considered a Moderate Adverse effect, of which one is the basement LKD. The remaining two rooms would experience alterations would be greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.199 For Winter PSH, all five rooms affected would experience alterations greater than 40 % which is considered a Major Adverse effect

15.200 Overall, the effect to the basement flat is considered to be Moderate to Major Adverse (significant) compared to Major Adverse in the July 2024. This property continues to fall beyond the alternative target criteria. However, this is generally a result of the existing architecture (self-obstruction or restrictive neighbouring buildings).

Overshadowing

15.201 A review of the Amended Proposed Development has been undertaken in relation to the location of proposed massing amendments relative to surrounding sensitive outdoor amenity areas.

15.202 Given the minimal nature of the proposed massing amendments which are limited to reductions to the massing parameters at Outline Component Plots WK02 and EC03 and the relative distance and minimal nature of massing and footprint changes to Detailed Component Plots WB04, WB05, EC04 and EC05, which are located somewhat centrally to the Site and at a relative distance from surrounding amenity areas, the overall effect conclusions would be unchanged. As such, the overshadowing assessment and conclusion of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

Solar Glare

15.203 A review of the Amended Proposed Development’s revised façade designs has been undertaken to determine the extent of changes the location of solid and reflective elements on the Detailed Component plots which may give rise to different solar glare effects.

15.204 The windows and balconies at Plots WB04, WB05 and EC05 have been revised to accommodate internal floorplan changes. There is potential for minimal changes to instances of reflection occurring at slightly different times of day and year from the surrounding viewpoints assessed in the July 2024 ES. However, the overall façade design principles and general proportion of glazed to solid materiality are unchanged and there continues to be no large areas of highly reflective materials proposed, which could give rise to long periods of solar glare.

15.205 Therefore, whilst the pattern of potential reflections may be slightly different, it is not considered to result in any different or additional significant effects. As such, the solar glare assessment and conclusions of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

Light Spill

15.206 A review of the Amended Proposed Development commercial uses, from which there is the potential for light spill effects upon residential receptors, has been undertaken to determine whether any of the revised proposals of the Amended Proposed Development detailed plots would be likely to give rise to different or new light spill effects. The commercial retail uses continue to be located on the lower levels of Plots WB04, EC05 and EC06. There is no material change in light spill terms to the separation distance from Plots WB04, EC05 and EC06 to surrounding residential receptors meaning that there would be no new or different effects from these commercial areas would occur to the nearby receptors. As such, the light spill assessment and Negligible (BRE Compliant) conclusions of the July 2024 ES are considered to remain valid.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

15.207 No additional mitigation is required, and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the residual effects reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development with the exception of the following one daylight receptor:

• Flats 1-88 Fairburn House: Improvement from Negligible Adverse to Negligible (BRE Compliant)

All Phases

15.208 No additional mitigation is required and no enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the residual effects reported in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the following eight daylight receptors and three sunlight receptors:

• Daylight Flats 21-35 Kensington Hall Gardens: Worsening from Moderate Adverse to Moderate to Major Adverse; Flats 36-45 Kensington Hall Gardens: Worsening from Negligible to Negligible Adverse; Whiteley's Cottages: Improvement from Major Adverse to Moderate Adverse; 21-35 Mornington Avenue: Improvement from Major Adverse to Moderate Adverse; 147-160 Gibbs Green: Improvement from Major Adverse to Minor Adverse;

7 Garsdale Terrace: Improvement from Moderate to Major Adverse to Moderate Adverse; Flats 1-88 Fairburn House: Improvement from Moderate to Major Adverse to Minor Adverse; and 42 Philbeach Gardens: Worsening from Moderate Adverse to Moderate to Major Adverse

• Sunlight

West Kensington Court - Edith Villas: Improvement from Minor Adverse to Negligible Adverse; Whiteley Cottages: Improvement from Minor Adverse to Negligible (BRE Compliant); Flats 1-30 Falkland House - Edith Villas: Improvement from Moderate Adverse to Negligible Adverse;

42 Philbeach Gardens: Improvement from Major Adverse to Moderate to Major Adverse

15.209 Accordingly, the previously reported significant daylight effects at 147-160 Gibbs Green and 1-88 Fairburn House are no longer valid for the All Phases

Summary of Residual Effects

15.210 For the Early Phases, the summary of the residual effects as reported in Table 15.18 of the July 2024 remain valid with the exception of one daylight receptor, listed in Table 15A.18A, where the re-assessment following post-submission consultation comments and the proposed amendments have resulted in different significant effects.

15.211 For the All Phases, the summary the residual effects as report in Table 15.19 of the July 2024 remain valid with the exception of eight daylight receptors and four sunlight receptors, listed in Table 15A.19A, where the re-assessment

following post-submission consultation comments and the proposed amendments have resulted in different significant effects.

Table 15A.18A: Amended Summary of Residual Early Phases Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

Table 15A.19A: Summary of Residual All Phases Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill Effects

Receptor

Kensington Hall Gardens

Whiteley's Cottages

21-35 Mornington Avenue

Flats 1-88 Fairburn House

42 Philbeach Gardens

Table 15A 19A: Summary of Residual All Phases Daylight, Sunlight, Overshadowing, Solar Glare and Light Spill Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect

Completed Development Sunlight

82 West Kensington Court - Edith Villas

Changes in sunlight amenity N/A Negligible (not significant)

84 Whiteley Cottages Changes in sunlight amenity N/A Negligible (BRE Compliant) (not significant)

84 Flats 1-30Falkland House - Edith Villas

Changes in sunlight amenity N/A Negligible (not significant)

360 42 Philbeach Gardens Changes in sunlight amenity N/A Moderate to Major (significant)

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

15.212 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the updated residual effects reported. These have been considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects.

Inter-Project Effects

15.213 The inter-project cumulative effects reported in the 2024 ES remains valid except for the addition of the Mund Street School site scheme which is located approximately 12 m west of the northern portion of the Site. Due to its proximity there are receptors with the potential to experience combined daylight and sunlight effects as a result of the Amended Proposed Development together with the Mund Street School site scheme.

15.214 Table 15A.20A provides a summary of the likely cumulative effects resulting from the Mund Street School site scheme

Table 15A.20A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Effects No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason

Early Phases

18 Mund Street No Due to the evolving nature of demolition and construction activities, the combined effects upon existing or future off-site receptors are not assessed, with the worst No Due to the relative distance of this cumulative development in relation to the Early Phases, no combined effects upon existing or future off-site receptors would occur.

Table 15A 20A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Effects

No Cumulative Development Demolition and Construction

Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely?

Reason Cumulative Effects Likely?

Reason case scenario represented by the Completed Development Cumulative Development scenario.

All Phases

18 Mund Street Yes The All Phases and cumulative scheme’s combined effects upon existing off-site receptors would increase as the massing of the two developments are built out.

Due to the orientation of windows and proximity to the Site, this cumulative scheme may see changes in daylight and sunlight levels as a result of the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development as the massing is built out.

Yes The All Phases and cumulative scheme’s combined effects upon existing off-site receptors would increase.

Due to the orientation of windows and proximity to the Site, this cumulative scheme may see changes in daylight and sunlight levels as a result of the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development

Early Phases

15.215 The Early Phases cumulative demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

15.216 The Early Phases cumulative completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

15.217 The inter-project cumulative effects reported in the 2024 ES remains valid except for the addition of the Mund Street School site scheme.

15.218 Due to the Mund Street School site’s undetermined planning status, this cumulative scheme has been qualitatively assessed. This qualitative assessment has been based on professional judgement, publicly available information, and the scheme’s location in relation to sensitive daylight, sunlight, and overshadowing receptors.

15.219 A technical cumulative assessment of both schemes should be reported within the Mund Street planning application as that application has been progressed after the submission of the July 2024 Application. The methodology and judgement used to determine the acceptability of cumulative effects expected to be reported in the Mund Street cumulative assessment would therefore be applicable to the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

15.220 The All Phases cumulative completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

15.221 Owing to the close proximity of the Mund Street School site to the northern portion of the Site, a number of shared receptors have been identified. These receptors (comprising windows, rooms and outdoor amenity spaces) are oriented such that they could experience combined daylight, sunlight or overshadowing effects from both the Mund Street School site and the Amended Proposed Development.

15.222 The following receptors have been identified as being potentially subject to cumulative daylight and/or sunlight effects:

• 18. 21-26 Dieppe Close;

• 100. 147-160 Gibbs Green;

• 101. 1 Dieppe Close (south facing windows);

• 102. 2 Dieppe Close (south facing windows);

• 110. 15 Dieppe Close (east facing windows);

• 111-115 16-20 Dieppe Close (south facing windows);

• 95, 117-122 1-7 Garsdale Terrace;

• 198-204. 2-14 (evens) Aisgill Avenue;

• 194. 14A Aisgill Avenue; and

• 240. 1-88 Fairburn House.

15.223 For overshadowing, the following shared amenity spaces have been identified as potentially subject to cumulative effects:

• 104-115. 9-18 Dieppe Close;

• 18. 21-26 Dieppe Close;

15.224 The massing of the Amended Proposed Development has been carefully designed to minimise impacts on these receptors. In isolation, the Amended Proposed Development results in ‘not significant’ effects (i.e. Negligible or Minor Adverse) to all shared receptors, with the exception of 7 Garsdale Terrace and 15 Dieppe Close, which still substantially meet the alternative target criteria.

15.225 Given the Mund Street School site’s immediate proximity to the shared receptors relative to the Amended Proposed Development, any additional cumulative daylight and sunlight significant effects are likely to arise predominantly from the Mund Street School site scheme. The incremental contribution of the Amended Proposed Development to any significant cumulative effect is limited.

15.226 As with daylight and sunlight, any material increase in overshadowing effects at these receptors will primarily result from the Mund Street School site scheme due to its proximity to those receptors. The Amended Proposed Development, in isolation, does not result in any significant overshadowing effects to these receptors, with all achieving BRE compliance.

Impacts upon Cumulative Schemes (Future Baseline)

15.227 The All Phases cumulative completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

15.228 The Mund Street School site scheme has also been qualitatively assessed as a future receptor, based on professional judgement and from a review of publicly available information.

15.229 When compared against the current existing condition of the Site, there is potential for the All Phases massing to result in daylight and sunlight effects to the future residential receptors coming forward as part of the Mund Street School site scheme. However, as the Mund Street School site scheme has been submitted after the July 2024 planning submission, its design has been developed in full knowledge of the Proposed Development.

15.230 Accordingly, the internal daylight and sunlight assessment for the Mund Street scheme would have accounted for the All Phases massing of the Proposed Development as part of its surrounding context. The positioning of windows and internal layouts would be designed to ensure suitable levels of daylight and sunlight for future occupants, with both developments coming forward in tandem. In this regard, any daylight and sunlight effects from the Amended Proposed

Development on this future receptor would have been incorporated within the Mund Street School scheme’s own internal daylight and sunlight assessment.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

15.231 Following submission the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF Consil, Schroeders Begg and Waterman.

15.232 These review comments have required:

• re-assessment of 22 daylight receptors and 21 sunlight receptors;

• inclusion of floorplans and/or room uses where these have been obtained;

• rectification of a minor error in the July 2024 ES; and

• removal of one receptor after being confirmed as non-residential use

15.233 Assessments of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, the assessments consider the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building footprints and height of the Amended Detailed Component; and the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component

15.234 In respect of the existing baseline, 20 daylight and sunlight receptors floorplans and room uses have been secured and one receptor has been removed from the assessment.

15.235 The following conclusions have been reached:

• The demolition and construction effects of the Early Phases and All Phases would remain unchanged.

• The completed development effects of the Early Phases would see a daylight improvement at 1-88 Fairburn House, such that BRE compliance would be achieved.

• The completed development effects of the All Phases would see: worsening of daylight levels at Flats 21-35 Kensington Hall Gardens and at Flats 36-45 Kensington Hall Gardens; and 42 Philbeach Gardens; improvement in daylight levels at Whiteley's Cottages, 21-35 Mornington Avenue, 147-160 Gibbs Green, 7 Garsdale Terrace and Flats 1-88 Fairburn House; and

improvement in sunlight levels at West Kensington Court - Edith Villas, Whiteley Cottages Flats 1-30 Falkland House - Edith Villas and 42 Philbeach Gardens

15.236 The previously reported significant daylight effects at 147-160 Gibbs Green and 1-88 Fairburn House would no longer be valid for the All Phases.

15.237 Therefore, overall, for daylight, Stage 1 of the assessment has concluded that of the 437 properties assessed, there would be no significant effects to 285 properties. Of the remaining 152 properties which would experience noticeable and significant adverse effects to daylight, the Stage 2 alternative target criteria assessment has concluded that:

• 96 properties would meet the alternative daylight target criteria and would be acceptable in consideration of context;

• 38 properties would substantially (for the most part) meet the alternative daylight target criteria and would be acceptable in consideration of context; and

• 18 properties would not meet the alternative daylight target criteria.

15.238 In summary, 65 % of the properties would see no significant effects. Where there are significant effects, 31 % of the properties assessed would meet, or substantially meet the Stage 2 alternative target criteria. The remaining 4 % would not meet the Stage 2alternative target criteria. These are:

• 40-42 Lillie Road (LBHF);

• 9-28, 29-38 Gibbs Green (LBHF);

• 1, 2, 3-8, 9, 10 and 14 Dieppe Close (LBHF);

• 14B, 14C and 14D Aisgill Avenue (LBHF);

• 7 Aisgill Avenue (LBHF);

• 7-9 Lillie Road (LBHF);

• 1 and 55 Eardley Crescent (RBKC); and

• 25 and 35 Philbeach Gardens (RBKC).

15.239 For sunlight, Stage 1 of the assessment has concluded that of the 271 properties assessed, there would be no significant effects to 199 properties. Of the remaining 72 properties which would experience noticeable and significant adverse effects to sunlight, the Stage 2 alternative target criteria assessment concludes that:

• 39 properties would meet the alternative sunlight target criteria and would be acceptable in consideration of context;

• 25 properties would substantially (for the most part) meet the alternative sunlight target criteria and would be acceptable in consideration of context; and

• 8 properties would not meet the alternative target criteria.

15.240 Based on a qualitative review, there is potential for additional cumulative significant adverse daylight, sunlight and overshadowing effects to existing receptors in proximity to both the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme and the Amended Proposed Development.

15.241 As the Mund Street School site cumulative scheme has come forward in the knowledge of the proposals for the Site, the scheme’s internal daylight and sunlight assessment is expected to account for the All Phases completed development, to ensure, where practicable, that future occupants will receive suitable levels of daylight and sunlight with the All Phases completed development in situ.

15.242 Therefore, in conclusion, additional and different significant adverse daylight and sunlight effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

16A WIND

Introduction

16.1 This chapter of the September 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely wind effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the wind assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building footprints, height; balconies, terraces and landscaping of the Amended Detailed Component; and the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component.

16.2 maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Outline Component; the massing, footprint, balconies and landscaping of the Detailed Component; and the Design Codes of the Outline Component

16.3 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 16: Wind and Volume 3, Technical Appendix 16.1: Illustrative Scheme and Supplementary Wind Microclimate Assessment of the July 2024 ES. The majority of these documents remain unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but they have been updated, where required Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g Table 1A.1N).

16.4 The chapter is supported by the following new technical appendices in ES Volume 3A: Technical Appendices Addendum:

• Technical Appendix 16A.2N: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulation Information;

• Technical Appendix 16A.3N: Landscape Modelling Information; and

• Technical Appendix 16A 4N: Balcony Modelling Information.

Methodology

16.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the wind assessment.

16.6 In respect of regional policy and guidance, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

16.7 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC New Local Plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking the assessment. The adopted RBKC New Local Plan contains no changes of relevance to the wind assessment.

16.8 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Consultation

16.9 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

16.10 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2.10N in ES Volume 3A.

16.11 The review comments have required consideration/ provision of the following in this addendum chapter:

1 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2025. National Planning Policy Framework. London. HMSO.

2 Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, 2024. New Local Plan Review London. RBKC.

• Detailed modelling information (Technical Appendices 16.2N - 16.4N);

• Additional receptors:

Earls Court Community Hub gardens (Existing use would be replaced by the proposed Aisgill Gardens (assessed at probe locations 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 and 258) and therefore this has not been considered further within this addendum);

Spill-out seating for the Hoarder café (Only considered in the existing baseline as assumed to be replaced in the completed development stage following interpretation of the demolition proposals);

Prince of Wales pub on Empress Place (Outdoor amenity terrace assumed to be retained following interpretation of the demolition proposals which is considered to be worst-case. Therefore considered in the existing baseline and in the completed development stage);

North End Road bus stop;

North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages;

Lillie Langtry pub seating terrace;

Residential lobby entrances at L01 of Plots EC05 and EC06 (from Warwick Walk);

Food & beverage entrances along the southern frontage of Plot EC05;

Entrance to the nursery within Plot EC06;

Workspace EC07 entrance at the north-west corner of Plot EC06;

L07 terrace on Plot EC05;

L26 private terraces / balconies on Plot EC05;

L35 corner terraces on Plot WB04;

• Cumulative scheme at 70-80 Lillie Road;

• More detailed commentary on the Illustrative Scheme where windier results have been recorded; and

• Potential effects at throughfare locations in the Outline Component and Illustrative Scheme in the event that entrances are provided at these locations

Assessment Scope

16.12 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ESremains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, for this addendum, the wind conditions:

• at additional receptors have been established qualitatively by interpretation of the modelled results of representative probe locations in proximity to the additional receptors based on professional judgement and experience; and

• the Amended Proposed Development has been assessed qualitatively by review of the proposed amendments and the conclusions of the July 2024 ES based on professional judgement and experience.

16.13 Updated wind tunnel testing has not been considered necessary to address post-submission comments and to undertake an assessment of the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Characterisation Method

16.14 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid.

16.15 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Assessment Method

16.16 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the assessment reported within this addendum has been based on:

• the Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description; and

• qualitative interpretation of the July 2024 wind tunnel results and application of professional judgement and experience

16.17 The list of cumulative schemes remain valid other than the addition of the Mund Street School site scheme which has been considered qualitatively in the Cumulative Effects section

16.18 In response to the Waterman review comments, the cumulative scheme at 70-80 Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TN (Planning Reference: 2023/00087/FR3) has been considered qualitatively in the Cumulative Effects section

16.19 In response to the Waterman review comments, the following additional commentary is provided in respect of the wind effects of the Outline Component, where the Configuration 10, 11, 12 and 13 Illustrative Scheme results were recorded as windier than the corresponding Configurations 2,3,6 and 7 Maximum Parameter results:

• Reductions in plot massing, as is evident in the Illustrative Scheme of the Outline Component, would likely increase the exposure of downwind plots, allow more winds to be redirected downwards and flow between the channels of buildings. However, this is highly variable and would be dependent on how each plot comes forward at the RMA stage. The Illustrative Scheme is just one version of how the Maximum Parameters can be delivered and therefore only provides a singular snapshot of potential conditions.

• Larger massing, as is evident in the Maximum Parameters of the Outline Component, would likely increase the amount of wind-building interaction, redirecting more winds downwards and increasing wind speeds. Furthermore, the lack of openings/channels between buildings could exacerbate the level of windiness at certain building corners, resulting in localised areas with relatively high wind speeds.

• Based on the above, there are limitations and variability in assessment of projects that are at an Outline stage and consideration of wind conditions within the context of the Illustrative Scheme, which is just one version of how the parameters may come forward in the future. Adding further detail discussion at each location where the Illustrative Scheme’s results are windier would add no further meaningful benefit and is not considered proportionate.

• Nevertheless, it is noted that for both the Maximum Parameters and Illustrative Scheme results no on-site areas are expected to have wind conditions unsuitable for thoroughfare use.

• In accordance with standard practice, further review of any proposed entrances and seating areas would be undertaken as each detailed scheme/ RMA comes forward (informed by the completed wind tunnel testing results) to ensure suitable wind conditions occur and no areas have potential safety concerns.

16.20 In response to the Waterman review comments, a succinct sensitivity test has been provided at the conclusion of this addendum chapter to report on the potential effects at the following throughfare locations in the event that entrances are provided:

• Southern façade of Plot EC04: 170;

• Southern façade of Plot EC17: 200;

• Northern façade of Plot WB06: 106;

• Southern façade of Plot WK09: 252;

• Eastern façade of Plot WK04: 285 and 322;

• Western façade of Plot WK05: 285 and 322;

• Southern façade of Plot WB10: 49;

• Western façade of Plot EC18: 210, 211;

• Western façade of Plot EC17: 204, 207;

• Northern façade of Plot EC02: 335;

• Southern façade of Plot EC03: 335;

• Western façade of Plot EC09: 168;

• Eastern façade of Plot WK03: 290 and 314;

• Western façade of Plot WK04: 290 and 314; and

• Channels between Plots WK10 and WK11: 260, 261, 266, 267.

Assessment Criteria

16.21 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

16.22 The assumptions and limitations presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Baseline Conditions

Existing Baseline

16.23 While it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, existing infrastructure has been utilised and no new infrastructure has been built. Therefore, the baseline conditions presented in the wind assessment of the July 2024 ES, remain materially

Configuration 1: Existing Baseline with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Pedestrian and Cyclist Comfort

16.24 The pedestrian and cyclist comfort presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for baseline scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.25 Post-application submission review comments have requested clarification in respect of a number of additional existing receptors. The results of representative July 2024 probe location in proximity to these receptors results have been interpreted to confirm baseline conditions at these receptors as summarised in Table 16A.1N.

Table 16A.1N: Additional Existing Receptor Baseline Conditions

Additional Existing Receptor Representative Probe Location Windiest Season Summer Season

North End Road active frontages 300, 301, 302 Standing and Sitting Sitting

Lillie Road active frontages 300, 301, 302 Standing and Sitting Sitting

North End Road bus stop 300, 301, 302 Standing and Sitting Sitting

Lillie Langtry pub seating terrace 3, 5 Sitting Sitting

Spill-out seating for the Hoarder café 4 Sitting Sitting

Prince of Wales pub on Empress Place 7 Sitting Sitting

Strong Winds

16.26 The pedestrian and cyclist safety presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

16.27 In respect of the additional existing receptors, no strong winds are relevant based on interpretation of the results of representative July 2024 probe locations.

Future Baseline

16.28 The future baseline as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Sensitive Receptors

16.29 The existing and future receptors presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

16.30 In response to post-application submission comments and the Amended Proposed Development, additional receptors have been considered as presented in Tables 16A.5A - 16A.7A.

Table 16A.5A: Amended Summary of Existing Sensitive Receptors

Receptor Receptor Reference (Probe Location Number)

Configuration 1 to 9: Off-site

Thoroughfares

Entrances

Bus Stops/Train Station

Ground Level Amenity

- Seating

• North End Road frontages: 300, 301, 302

• Lillie Road frontages: 300, 301, 302

• North End Road frontages: 300, 301, 302

• Lillie Road frontages: 300, 301, 302

• North End Road bus stop: 300, 301, 302

• Spill-out seating for the Hoarder café: 4

• Prince of Wales pub on Empress Place: 7

• Lillie Langtry pub: 3 and 5.

Table 16A.6A: Amended Summary of Future Proposed Development Sensitive Receptors

Receptor Receptor Reference (Probe Location Number)

Configuration 2 to 9: On-site

Entrances

Balconies

Terrace level Amenity - Mixed-Use

• Residential lobby entrances at L01 of Plots EC05 and EC06: 183 and 196

• Food & beverage entrances along the southern frontage of Plot EC05: 181

• Entrance to the nursery within Plot EC06: 195 and 197

• Workspace Plot EC07 entrance at the north-west corner of Plot EC06: 202

• Proposed new L01 and L02 balconies of Plot EC05: 184

• L35 corner terraces on Plot WB04: 406, 407, 384 and 484

• L26 private terraces / balconies on Plot EC05: 351-355

• L07 terrace on Plot EC05: 343

Table 16A.7A: Amended Summary of Future Illustrative Scheme Sensitive Receptors

Receptor Receptor Reference (Probe Location Number)

Configuration 10-13: On-site

Entrances

Balconies

Terrace level Amenity

- Mixed-Use

• Residential lobby entrances at L01 of Plots EC05 and EC06: 183 and 196

• Food & beverage entrances along the southern frontage of Plot EC05: 181

• Entrance to the nursery within Plot EC06: 195 and 197

• Workspace EC07 entrance at the northwest corner of Plot EC06: 202

• Proposed new L01 and L02 balconies of Plot EC05: 184

• L35 corner terraces on Plot WB04: 406, 407, 384 and 484

• L26 private terraces / balconies on Plot EC05: 351-355

• L07 terrace on Plot EC05: 343

Assessment of Effects

16.31 The assessment has considered the following relevant proposed amendments:

• Detailed Component:

Amended Plot layouts to account for the updated Fire Safety Regulations and resulting increased building footprints (Plots WB04 and WB05 by approximately 0.1 m and 0.34 m respectively, Plot EC06 by approximately 0.8 m);

Introduction of additional balconies at Plot EC05 levels 01 and 02 and a terrace at level 07; De minimus height increase at Plots EC05 and EC06; and

Public realm and communal residential terrace layout and landscape updates following building footprint and design changes at Plots EC05, EC06, WB03 and WB04.

• Outline Component:

Development Zones A, B and C addition of limits of deviation (plus/minus 2-2.8 m);

Development Zone F (Plot EC03) maximum building height reduction from 71.3 mAOD to 67.8 mAOD (3.5 m); and

Development Zone X (Plot WK02) massing setback to the north (23.2 mAOD by

28.1 mAOD by 4.5 m; 31.4 mAOD by 3.6 m).

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

16.32 The demolition and construction works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. Information on the amended proposed demolition and construction works is presented in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

16.33 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Effects

16.34 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. The completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Configuration 2: Early Phases with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Pedestrian and Cyclist Comfort

16.35 The pedestrian and cyclist comfort presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.36 Following post-submission review comments on the July 2024 ES, qualitative assessment has been undertaken of 13 additional identified sensitive receptors using representative probe location results, professional judgement and experience. A summary is presented In Table 16A.2N.

Season – On Site Proposed new L01 and L02 balconies of Plot EC05

WB04 L35 corner terraces

Season – Off Site Lillie Langtry pub seating terrace 3,

407, 483, 484

Existing Off-Site

16.37 Expected conditions at off-site thoroughfare locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Entrances

Proposed On-Site Entrances

16.38 Expected conditions at on-site entrances to Plots EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, Plot EC05 F&B southern frontage and EC06 nursery would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

16.39 Strolling use wind conditions are expected at the western elevation of the Plot EC06 nursery (probe location 197) and would be one category windier than required and would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Adverse (significant) effects.

16.40 There would be strolling use wind conditions expected at the Plot EC06 north-west corner (probe location 202). However, this is a secondary entrance used for plant access and maintenance, therefore strolling use wind conditions would be considered tolerable and would represent a permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effect.

Existing Off-Site Entrances

16.41 Expected conditions at off-site entrance locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Bus Stops/Train Stations

Existing Off-site Bus Stops and Train Stations

16.42 Expected conditions at the off-site bus stop on North End Road would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Ground Level Amenity – Seating

Existing Off-Site Ground Level Amenity – Seating

16.43 Expected conditions at off-site seating at Lillie Langtry pub and Prince of Wales pub would represent permanent, longterm, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Balconies

Proposed On-Site Balconies

16.44 Expected conditions at on-site balconies at L01 and L02 of Plot EC05 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant) effects.

Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

Proposed On-Site Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

16.45 Expected conditions at on-site L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial to Negligible (not significant) effects.

Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety

16.46 The pedestrian and cyclist safety presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario Amended Proposed Development.

16.47 No safety exceedances are expected at the additional receptors and the new receptors

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

16.48 The demolition and construction works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. Information on the amended proposed demolition and construction works is presented in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

16.49 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Effects

16.50 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. The completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Configuration 3: Proposed All Phases with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Pedestrian and Cyclist Comfort

16.51 The pedestrian and cyclist comfort presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.52 Following post-submission review comments on the July 2024 ES, qualitative assessment has been undertaken of additional identified sensitive receptors using representative probe locations and professional judgement. A summary is presented In Table 16A.3N. Table 16A.3N: Configuration 3 - Proposed All Phases Summary of Negligible, Beneficial and Adverse Effects and Strong Winds (Additional Receptors Qualitative Assessment)

Thoroughfares

Existing Off-Site Thoroughfares

16.53 Expected conditions at off-site thoroughfare locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Entrances

Proposed On-Site Entrances

16.54 Expected conditions at on-site entrances to EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, EC05 F&B southern frontage, EC06 nursery and EC06 north-west corner would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial to Negligible (not significant) effects.

Existing Off-Site Entrances

16.55 Expected conditions at off-site entrance locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Bus Stops/Train Stations

Existing Off-site Bus Stops and Train Stations

16.56 Expected conditions at off-site bus stop on North End Road would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Ground Level Amenity – Seating

Existing Off-Site Ground Level Amenity – Seating

16.57 Expected conditions at off-site seating at Lillie Langtry pub and Prince of Wales pub would represent permanent, longterm, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Balconies

Proposed On-Site Balconies

16.58 Expected conditions at on-site balconies at L01 and L02 of Plot EC05 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant) effects.

Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

Proposed On-Site Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

16.59 Expected conditions at on-site L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial to Negligible (not significant) effects.

Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety

16.60 The pedestrian and cyclist safety presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario Amended Proposed Development.

16.61 No safety exceedances are expected at the additional receptors and the new receptors

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

Additional Mitigation

16.62 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Stage

16.63 The additional mitigation for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Stage

Configuration 2

16.64 The assessment of the Detailed and Outline Components for the Early Phases in the context of existing buildings (Configuration 2) concluded that there would be significant adverse effects at the locations presented in the July 2024 ES. These remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, the following additional location with significant effects has been identified:

• During the windiest season, proposed on-site entrances with: Strolling use wind conditions at measurement locations 197.

Configuration 4 Proposed Additional Mitigation

16.65 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Enhancement Measures

16.66 The enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Residual Effects

Demolition and Construction

16.67 The residual effects for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development

16.68 The completed development residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.69 With consideration of the additional mitigation in the form of proposed landscaping within the Detailed Component presented in the July 2024 ES and using the results from the representative probe location 197, it is expected that the nursery entrances to Plot EC06 would no longer have windier than required strolling use conditions during the windiest season. Standing use wind conditions are expected to occur, suitable for the intended use and would represent a permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (significant) effect.

All Phases

Additional Mitigation

16.70 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Stage

16.71 The additional mitigation for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Stage

Configuration 3

16.72 The assessment of the Detailed and Outline Components for the All Phases in the context of existing buildings (Configuration 3) concluded that there would be significant adverse effects at the locations presented in the July 2024 ES These remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Configuration 5 Proposed Additional Mitigation

16.73 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Enhancement Measures

16.74 The enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Residual Effects

Demolition and Construction

16.75 The residual effects for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development

16.76 The completed development residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

16.77 The summary of residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid. However, the residual effects of the qualitative assessment undertaken of 13 additional identified sensitive receptors are presented In Table 16A.12A.

16.78 The sensitivity test at the conclusion of this addendum includes commentary on assessed terrace locations, where additional significant effects may be likely in the event that entrances are delivered. Entrance locations within the Amended Outline Component have not been determined and would only be considered at the detailed design stage, subject to further wind assessment at the time. Therefore, commentary on potential entrance locations of the Amended Outline Component have been excluded from Table 16A.12A.

Table 16A.12A: Amended Summary of Residual Wind Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect ** Nature of Residual Effect*

Early Phases

Completed Development

Proposed off-site thoroughfare users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages)

Proposed on-site Entrance users

(Plots EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, Plot EC05 F&B southern frontage and Plot EC06 nursery, Plot EC06 north-west corner

Proposed off-site entrance users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages)

Proposed off-site bus stop or train station users (North End Road)

Proposed off-site ground level seating users (Lillie Langtry pub, Prince of Wales pub)

Proposed on-site balcony users (L01 and L02 of Plot EC05)

Sitting to walking use (Windiest season)

Sitting to strolling use (Windiest season)

None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 181, 183, 195, 196, 197, 202

Sitting to standing use (Windiest season)

Sitting to standing use (Windiest season)

Sitting use (Summer season)

None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 3, 5, 7

Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

None Required Minor (not significant) for representative probe locations: 184

Table 16A.12A: Amended Summary of Residual Wind Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect

Proposed on-site

rooftop/terrace level mixed use amenity users (L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04)

Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

None Required Minor (not significant) for representative probe locations: 343, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355

Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations:406, 407, 483, 484

All Phases

Completed Development

Proposed off-site thoroughfare users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages)

Proposed on-site Entrance users

(Plots EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, Plot EC05

F&B southern frontage and Plot

EC06 nursery, Plot

EC06 north-west corner

Proposed off-site entrance users

(North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages)

Proposed off-site bus stop or train station users (North End Road)

Proposed off-site ground level seating users (Lillie Langtry pub, Prince of Wales pub)

Sitting to walking use (Windiest season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Sitting to strolling use (Windiest season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 181, 183, 195, 196, 197, 202,

Sitting to standing use (Windiest season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Sitting to standing use (Windiest season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Sitting use (Summer season)

None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 3, 5, 7

Table 16A.12A: Amended Summary of Residual Wind Effects

Receptor Description of Residual Effect Additional Mitigation Scale and Significance of Residual Effect **

Proposed on-site balcony users (L01 and L02 of Plot EC05)

Proposed on-site rooftop/terrace level mixed use amenity users (L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/ balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04)

Notes:

Sitting to standing use (Summer season) None Required Minor (not significant) for representative probe locations: 184

Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

None Required Minor (not significant) for representative probe locations: 343, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355

Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 406, 407, 483, 484

* - = Adverse/ + = Beneficial/ +/- = Neutral; D = Direct/ I = Indirect; P = Permanent/ T = Temporary; R = Reversible/ IR = Irreversible; St = Short-term/ Mt = Medium-term/ Lt = Long-term.

**Negligible/Minor/Moderate/Major

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

16.79 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are considered in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects

Inter-Project Effects

16.80 The inter-project cumulative effects reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

16.81 Table 16A 13A presents a summary of the likelihood for inter-project cumulative effects with the 70-80 Lillie Road and Mund Street School site schemes.

Table 16A.13A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Effects Early Phases

No. Cumulative Scheme Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason

17 70-80 Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TN, (Planning Reference: 2023/00087/FR3) Yes Scheme within the study area and likely to be influenced by wind conditions at the Proposed Development.

Yes Scheme within the study area and likely to be influenced by wind conditions at the Proposed Development.

18 Mund Street School site Yes Scheme within the study area and likely to be Yes Scheme within the study area and likely to be

Table 16A.13A: Amended Inter-Project Cumulative Effects

Early Phases

No. Cumulative Scheme Demolition and Construction Completed Development Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason Cumulative Effects Likely? Reason influenced by wind conditions at the Proposed Development. influenced by wind conditions at the Proposed Development.

All Phases

The likely cumulative effects and reasoning for All Phases demolition and construction, and completed development stage is the same as that presented for the Early Phases assessment.

Early Phases

16.82 The 70-80 Lillie Road cumulative scheme would be approximately five storeys in height. This would be substantially lower than the Amended Proposed Development, and therefore is unlikely to have a material impact on the local wind microclimate. Furthermore, there is substantial landscaping in the form of trees that would be similar in height between the Site and this cumulative scheme, which would further limit its impact.

16.83 The majority of the Mund Street School site buildings would be approximately six storeys in height. This would be substantially lower than the Amended Proposed Development and the scheme is therefore unlikely to have a material impact on the local wind microclimate. However, there would be a taller element, approximately 11 storeys in height, which could have an impact on the amount of winds interacting with the Outline Components of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.85 It is noted that, having come forward after the July 2024 Hybrid Planning Applications, the Mund Street School site scheme design evolution would have developed in the knowledge of massing being proposed within the Site.

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

16.86 The demolition and construction works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. Information on the amended proposed demolition and construction works is presented in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

16.87 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

16.88 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. The completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Configuration 6: Early Phases with Cumulative Schemes

Pedestrian and Cyclist Comfort

16.89 The pedestrian and cyclist comfort presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.90 Following post-submission review comments on the July 2024 ES, qualitative assessment has been undertaken of 13 additional sensitive receptors using representative probe locations and professional judgement. A summary is presented In Table 16A.4N

16.84 As the scheme is situated adjacent to the LBD, it is considered unlikely that the conditions around the Early Phases would be materially affected, due to the Early Phases being out with the prevailing wind direction This scheme would be included in future assessments as each detailed design / RMA comes forward to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered across the Early Phases

Table 16A.4N: Configuration 6 - Proposed Early Phases Summary of

Existing Off-Site Thoroughfares

16.91 Expected conditions at off-site thoroughfare locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Entrances

Proposed On-Site Entrances

16.92 Expected conditions at on-site entrances to EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, EC05 F&B southern frontage and EC06 nursery would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

16.93 Strolling use wind conditions are expected at the western elevation of the EC06 nursery (probe location 197) and would be one category windier than required and would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Adverse (significant) effects.

16.94 There would be strolling use wind conditions expected at the EC06 north-west corner (probe location 202). However, this is a secondary entrance used for plant access and maintenance, therefore strolling use wind conditions would be considered tolerable and would represent a permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effect.

Existing Off-Site Entrances

16.95 Expected conditions at off-site entrance locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Bus Stops/Train Stations

Existing Off-site Bus Stops and Train Stations

16.96 Expected conditions at off-site bus stop on North End Road would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Ground Level Amenity – Seating

Existing Off-Site Ground Level Amenity – Seating

16.97 Expected conditions at off-site seating at Lillie Langtry pub and Prince of Wales pub would represent permanent, longterm, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Balconies

Proposed On-Site Balconies

16.98 Expected conditions at on-site balconies at L01 and L02 of EC05 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant) effects.

Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

Proposed On-Site Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

16.99 Expected conditions at on-site L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial to Negligible (not significant) effects.

Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety

16.100 The pedestrian and cyclist safety presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario Amended Proposed Development.

16.101 No safety exceedances are expected at the additional receptors and the new receptors

All Phases

16.102 The 70-80 Lillie Road cumulative scheme would be approximately five storeys in height. This would be substantially lower than the Amended Proposed Development, and therefore is unlikely to have a material impact on the local wind microclimate. Furthermore, there is substantial landscaping in the form of trees that would be similar in height between the Site and this cumulative scheme, which would further limit its impact.

16.103 The majority of the Mund Street School site scheme buildings would be approximately six storeys in height. This would be substantially lower than the Amended Proposed Development and the scheme is therefore unlikely to have a material impact on the local wind microclimate. However, there would be a taller element, approximately 11 storeys in height, which could have an impact on the amount of winds interacting with the Outline Components of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.104 As the scheme is situated to the west of Plot WK11, it is considered unlikely that the conditions around the north-eastern, eastern, southern and south-western Plots of the All Phases would be materially affected, due to the plots being out with the prevailing wind direction. This scheme would be included in future assessments as each detailed design / RMA comes forward to ensure suitable wind conditions are delivered around the northern and north-western Plots of the All Phases

16.105 It is noted that, having come forward after the July 2024 Hybrid Planning Applications, the Mund Street School site scheme design evolution would have developed in the knowledge of massing being proposed within the Site.

Demolition and Construction Cumulative Effects

16.106 The demolition and construction works presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. Information on the amended proposed demolition and construction works is presented in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description.

16.107 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. Accordingly, the demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Cumulative Effects

16.108 The proposed amendments would be minor with respect to wind and would not be expected to have a material effect on wind conditions reported in the July 2024 ES. The completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Configuration 7: Proposed All Phases with Cumulative Surrounding Buildings

Pedestrian and Cyclist Comfort

16.109 The pedestrian and cyclist comfort presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.110 Following post-submission review comments on the July 2024 ES, qualitative assessment has been undertaken of 13additional sensitive receptors using representative probe locations and professional judgement. A summary is presented In Table 16A.5N.

Table 16A.5N: Configuration 7 - Proposed All Phases Summary of Negligible, Beneficial and Adverse Effects and Strong Winds (Additional Receptors Qualitative Assessment)

Windiest

16.111 Expected conditions at off-site thoroughfare locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Entrances

Proposed On-Site Entrances

16.112 Expected conditions at on-site entrances to EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, EC05 F&B southern frontage, EC06 nursery and EC06 north-west corner would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial to Negligible (not significant) effects.

Existing Off-Site Entrances

16.113 Expected conditions at off-site entrance locations along North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Bus Stops/Train Stations

Existing Off-site Bus Stops and Train Stations

16.114 Expected conditions at off-site bus stop on North End Road would represent permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Ground Level Amenity – Seating

Existing Off-Site Ground Level Amenity – Seating

16.115 Expected conditions at off-site seating at Lillie Langtry pub and Prince of Wales pub would represent permanent, longterm, direct Negligible (not significant) effects.

Balconies

Proposed On-Site Balconies

16.116 Expected conditions at on-site balconies at L01 and L02 of EC05 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial (not significant) effects.

Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

Proposed On-Site Terrace Level Amenity – Mixed-Use

16.117 Expected conditions at on-site L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04 would represent permanent, long-term, direct Minor Beneficial to Negligible (not significant) effects.

Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety

16.118 The pedestrian and cyclist safety presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario Amended Proposed Development.

16.119 No safety exceedances are expected at the additional receptors and the new receptors

Assessment of Residual Cumulative Effects

Early Phases

Additional Mitigation

16.120 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Stage

16.121 The additional mitigation for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Stage

Configuration 6

16.122 The assessment of the Amended Detailed and Amended Outline Components for the Early Phases in the context of cumulative buildings (Configuration 2) concluded that there would be significant adverse effects at the locations presented in the July 2024 ES, which remains valid, and additionally at the following locations:

• During the windiest season, proposed entrances with: Strolling use wind conditions at measurement locations 197.

Configuration 8 Proposed Additional Mitigation

16.123 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Enhancement Measures

16.124 The enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Residual Effects

Demolition and Construction Stage

16.125 The residual effects for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Stage

16.126 The completed development residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.127 With consideration of the additional mitigation in the form of proposed landscaping within the Detailed Component assessed in the July 2024 ES, and using the results from the representative probe location 197, it is expected that the nursery entrances to Plot EC06 would not have windier than required strolling use wind conditions during the windiest season. Standing use wind conditions are expected to occur, suitable for the intended use and would represent a permanent, long-term, direct Negligible (significant) effect.

All Phases

Additional Mitigation

16.128 The additional mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Demolition and Construction Stage

16.129 The additional mitigation for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Stage

Configuration 7

16.130 The assessment of the Detailed and Outline Components for the All Phases in the context of cumulative buildings (Configuration 7) concluded that there would be significant adverse effects at the locations presented in the July 2024 ES.

Configuration 9 Proposed Additional Mitigation

16.131 The enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Enhancement Measures

16.132 The enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Residual Effects

Demolition and Construction

16.133 The residual effects for the demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development

16.134 The completed development residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Sensitivity Test

16.135 In response to the Waterman post-submission comments, a sensitivity test has been undertaken to report on the potential effects at throughfare locations where strong wind conditions were reported in the July 2024 ES and conclude on likely effects in the event that entrances are provided. The results of the sensitivity test are provided in Table 16A.6N.

Table 16A.6N: Sensitivity Test of Potential Entrance Provision at 2024 July Assessed Thoroughfares Thoroughfare

Phases

of Plot WB10 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

Northern façade of Plot WB06

of

wind assessment as part of the RMA stage. Southern façade of Plot EC17

of

Western façade of Plot EC17

Western façade of Plot EC18

of Plot EC18 and

Table 16A.6N: Sensitivity Test of Potential Entrance Provision at 2024 July Assessed Thoroughfares

Thoroughfare Location Probe Locations Potential Use and Required Wind Conditions

Proposed Early Phases with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Proposed All Phases with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Proposed Early Phases with Cumulative Surrounding Buildings

Proposed All Phases with Cumulative Surrounding Buildings

Northern façade of Plot EC02: 335 and Southern façade of Plot EC03

All Phases

Southern façade of Plot WB10

Northern façade of Plot WB06

subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

for significant adverse effects to be considered at the detailed design if entrances are located along the northern façade of Plot EC02 and southern façade of Plot EC03 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

Potential for significant adverse effects to be considered at the detailed design if entrances are located along the northern façade of Plot WB06 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage. Western façade of Plot EC09

Southern façade of Plot EC04

façade of

Southern façade of Plot EC17

Western façade of Plot EC17

Western façade of Plot EC18

Table 16A.6N: Sensitivity Test of Potential Entrance Provision at 2024 July Assessed Thoroughfares

Thoroughfare Location Probe Locations Potential Use and Required Wind Conditions

Proposed Early Phases with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Proposed All Phases with Existing Surrounding Buildings

Proposed Early Phases with Cumulative Surrounding Buildings

Proposed All Phases with Cumulative Surrounding Buildings Commentary

Channels between PlotsWK10 and WK11

260, 261, 266, 267

Eastern façade of Plot WK04 and Western Façade of Plot WK05

Eastern façade of Plot WK03 and Western façade of Plot WK04 290, 314

Northern façade of Plot EC02: 335 and Southern façade of Plot EC03

335 EntranceStanding N/A N/A N/A

Summary of Assessment Post-Application Submission

16.136 Following the July 2024 ES submission, post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required the following:

• Provision of detailed modelling information;

• Qualitative assessment of 13 additional receptors;

• Qualitative assessment of a cumulative scheme at 70-80 Lillie Road;

• More detailed commentary on the Illustrative Scheme where windier results have been recorded; and

• Qualitative assessment of potential effects at throughfare locations in the Outline Component and Illustrative Scheme in the event that entrances are provided at these locations.

15.1 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to proposed amendments to the demolition and construction works; the building footprints, height; balconies, terraces and landscaping of the Amended Detailed Component; and the development zone maximum vertical and horizontal parameters of the Amended Outline Component.

16.137 In respect of baseline conditions, on-site and off-site conditions have not materially changed. However, consideration has been given to the baseline conditions at six additional receptors which would be present in the baseline scenario.

Adverse Potential for significant adverse effects to be considered at the detailed design if entrances are located along the southern façade of Plot WK11 and northern façade of Plot WK10 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

Potential for significant adverse effects to be considered at the detailed design if entrances are located along the eastern façade of Plot WK04 and western façade of Plot WK05 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

Potential for significant adverse effects to be considered at the detailed design if entrances are located along the eastern façade of Plot WK03 and western façade of Plot WK04 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

Potential for significant adverse effects to be considered at the detailed design if entrances are located along the northern façade of Plot EC02 and southern façade of Plot EC03 and subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage.

16.138 The assessment has concluded that the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early and All Phases development scenarios of the Amended Proposed Development in respect of the following likely wind effects:

• The demolition and construction works wind comfort and safety effects of the Early Phases and All Phases at existing off-site and proposed on-site receptors; and

• The completed development wind comfort and safety effects of the Early Phases and All Phases at existing off-site and proposed on-site receptors

16.139 The assessment has reached the following conclusions with regard to the 13 additional receptors:

• For the Early Phases, wind effects at 12 additional receptors would not be significant. Expected conditions at the western elevation of the Plot EC06 nursery (probe location 197) and would be one category windier than required and would represent significant adverse effects However, with consideration of the additional mitigation assessed in the July 2024 ES, and using the results from the representative probe location 197, it is expected that the windy conditions at the nursery entrances to Plot EC06 would be mitigated such that significant effects are avoided

• For the All Phases, wind effects at the 13 additional receptors would not be significant.

16.140 A qualitative assessment of cumulative schemes at 70-80 Lillie Road and Mund Street School site concluded that no inter-project cumulative effects are likely to arise. Therefore, the cumulative residual effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early and All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

16.141 The cumulative results for the 13 additional receptors would be the same as reported for the Early and All Phases in isolation.

16.142 Entrance locations are not known for the Outline Component. A sensitivity test was undertaken to assess potential effects at throughfare locations for the Outline Component and Illustrative Scheme in the event that entrances are provided at these locations as the detailed design stage. The sensitivity test concluded that for the Early Phases, two locations would have suitable wind conditions for entrance use, whereas seven locations would have windier than required conditions for entrance use.

16.143 The sensitivity test concluded that for the All Phases, five locations would have suitable wind conditions for entrance use, whereas ten locations would have windier than required conditions for entrance use.

16.144 All of these thoroughfare locations would be subject to further wind assessment as part of the RMA stage, where the intended usage and suitability of conditions will be verified

16.145 Accordingly, for the main development and assessment scenarios, it has been confirmed that no additional or different significant wind effects are likely to arise for the Amended Proposed Development.

1

2

17A CLIMATE

Introduction

17.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely climate effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The updated assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the climate assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the proposed amendments to the land use floorspace area schedules; Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA); and technical assessments within the 2025 ES Addendum

17.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 17: Climate of the July 2024 ES. The majority of the document remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but have been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green. Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

17.3 The introduction as presented in Chapter 17 of July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Methodology

17.4 In respect of international legislation, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

17.5 In respect of national legislation, policy and guidance, the NPPF was updated in December 2024 with further minor revisions made in February 20251. The updated NPPF contains no changes of relevance to the Climate Change Resilience (CCR), In-Combination Climate Impacts (ICCI) and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) assessments.

17.6 In respect of local policy, the RBKC New Local Plan (2024)2 was adopted on 24 July 2024. The July 2024 ES had regard to RBKC new local plan emerging policy at the time of undertaking assessment While minor text updates have been made to the draft policies previously considered, these do not introduce any new considerations for the CCR, ICCI and GHG assessments.

17.7 In respect of topic specific guidance and industry standards, the documents presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid. However it is noted that new LBHF carbon off-setting pricing guidance3 has been adopted.

Consultation

17.8 The consultation process presented in the July 2024 ES, relates to the pre-application submission stage including the formal EIA Scoping process, which remains valid.

17.9 Following submission of the July 2024 ES, post-application review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. The full set of comments and responses are presented in Technical Appendix 2A.10N in ES Volume 3A.

17.10 In response to the review comments, an explanation regarding the reporting of minus figures for the comparison of the Amended Proposed Development GHG emissions against the fourth carbon budget has been provided within the Assessment of Effects section

17.11 Furthermore, updates have been made to the WLCA and Circular Economy Statement in response to Waterman, LPA and GLA comments (in addition to accounting for the Amended Proposed Development). The GHG assessment of this chapter has been based on the 2025 WLCA Addendum.

Assessment Scope

17.12 The assessment scope presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. However, in respect of the spatial scope:

• the ICCI assessment has considered the relevant amended technical discipline chapters of ES Volume 1A and 2A; and

• the GHG assessment has considered ES chapter 9A: Transport and Accessibility.

Baseline Characterisation Method

17.13 The change to the redline boundary as outlined in ES Volume 1A, Chapter 1A: Introduction, is considered de-minimis in terms of the Site area and description. Accordingly, in the interest of proportionality, figures presented in the July 2024 ES have not been updated.

Climate Change Resilience and In-Combination Climate Impacts

17.14 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development. Data for this addendum has also been obtained from ES Chapter 1A: Introduction.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

17.15 The baseline characterisation methods presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception that data was also obtained from the following new sources:

• Local Planning Authorities (LBHF and RBKC) and national carbon dioxide emissions statistics for 20234; and

• Seventh carbon budget5

Assessment Method

17.16 The assessment method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However for this addendum, the assessment has been based on the following:

• Amended Proposed Development as presented in ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description;

• Amended carbon emissions for the Amended Detailed Component as presented within the Earls Court Development WLCA Addendum; and

• Amended assumed worst-case Area Schedule for the Outline Component which has changed due to adjustments of the minimum and maximum use types proposed within the Area Schedule.

17.17 Table 17A.2R presents the amended assumed worst-case Area Schedule for the Amended Outline Component, as well as the updated carbon intensity benchmarks provided by the Applicant’s WLCA consultant (Hoare Lea). The benchmarks have changed as they are calculated by determining an average kgCO2e per m2 across all plots within the Amended Detailed component, which has been altered since the July 2024 ES

Costs for Major Developments (July 2025)

4 UK GOV, 2025. UK local authority and regional greenhouse gas emissions national statistics, 2005 to 2023. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-localauthority-and-regional-greenhouse-gas-emissions-statistics-2005-to-2023 [accessed 10 July 2025].

5 Climate Change Committee, 2025. The Seventh Carbon Budget. Available at: https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/the-seventh-carbon-budget/ [accessed 17 July 2025].

Table 17A.2R: Amended Greenhouse Gas Emission Worst-Case Area Schedule

6 Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2025 Emissions factors Toolkit v13.1. Available at: https://laqm.defra.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/EFTv13.1user-guide-v1.0.pdf [accessed 17 July 2025]

17.18 In respect of the completed development stage GHG emissions assessment, the method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid with the exception of the following updates:

• Estimates for traffic flows has followed the Emissions Factors Toolkit (EFT) V13 1 published by Defra6 Version 13.1 which incorporates an update of base fleet splits for all areas up until 2050 and utilises COPERT v5.8 for CO2 emission factors. The toolkit includes a methodology for calculating indirect CO2e emissions associated with the charging of the batteries of electric and plug-in hybrid cars and Light Good Vehicles (LGVs). The toolkit remains consistent with previous EFT versions. Emission factors for particulate matter (PM) non-exhaust emissions sources remain in line with v12.1 of the EFT using information published in the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/European Environment Agency (EMEP/EEA) Emissions Inventory Guidebook 20197;

• The Early Phases completed development stage traffic flows have been updated with vehicle movements each day (annual average daily traffic - ‘AADT’) increasing from 4,411 ADDT to 5,815 ADDT The All Phases completed development stage vehicle movements each day has increased from 6,834 AADT to 9,222 AADT;

• The Early Phases completed development stage traffic flows have been updated with percentage of heavy-duty vehicles (HDV) from 14.5 % to 21 %. The All Phases percentage of HDV has increased from 14.1% to 20%; and

• Amended cut and fill calculations provided by the Applicant’s WLCA consultant, Hoare Lea as part of the Whole Life Carbon & Circular Economy Strategy These updates were considered under the Infrastructure and Public Realm component.

17.19 In respect of carbon budgets, the Climate Change Committee released its statutory report Seventh Carbon Budget in February 2025 in which the UK Government will have to set its seventh carbon budget by June 2026, covering emissions up to 2042. The proposed seventh carbon budget is 535,000,000 tCO2e However, the budget is not expected to cover all of the demolition and construction stage for the All Phases development scenario which is expected to occur between Q4 2024 and Q2 2043 (19 years) Accordingly, GHG emissions have also been compared with the Tyndall Centre carbon budgets for the years 2038 - 2042. Information relating to the fourth, fifth and sixth carbon budgets presented in the July 2024 ES have not changed and remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment Criteria

17.20 The assessment criteria presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assumptions and Limitations

17.21 The assumptions within the method presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Baseline Conditions Existing Baseline

Climate Change Resilience and In-Combination Climate Change Impact

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

17.22 Whilst it is noted that a new meanwhile use has been introduced on-site, no new infrastructure has been introduced and therefore, the Site description and existing floor space presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

17.23 The operational GHG emissions of the existing development over 60 years have been referred to as the ‘do minimum’ scenario and are presented within Table 17A.12R Note that the existing development GHG emissions have changed as the calculations rely on the updated outline benchmarks provided by the Applicant’s WLCA consultant (Hoare Lea).

Table 17A.12R: Amended Existing Development Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary Stage of Lifecycle

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Climate Change Resilience

17.30 The CCR demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.15 remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the updates presented in Table 17A.15A All references to ES Chapter 5 should now also include ES Chapter 5A.

Table 17A.15A: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Climate Change Resilience Assessment

Climate Change Trend8 Climate (Change) Impact on Receptor

Embedded Design and Mitigation Measures Significance of Effect Additional Mitigation Required

* Note that the end-of-life emissions presented have been significantly reduced compared to the July 2024 ES. This is because, in the July 2024 ES, the end-of-life emissions were inadvertently multiplied by the design life of the development, rather than presenting them as a one-time value at the end of the asset's life. This correction aligns the assessment with standard carbon reporting methodology. Importantly, the change has no impact on the overall outcome of the assessment, and in all cases, total emissions presented within this table have decreased as a result of the proposed amendments

17.24 National carbon dioxide emissions statistics published by the UK Government have been updated to cover the most upto-date historic emissions data covering 2005-2023 for all Local Authorities and Councils. This showed that LBHF and RBKC emitted 591 ktCO2e and 697 ktCO2e respectively in 2023

17.25 The amended LBHF emissions can be broken into the following sectors:

• 122 ktCO2e from transport;

• 187 ktCO2e from domestic sources;

• 60 ktCO2e from the public sector;

• 154 ktCO2e from commercial; and

• 53 ktCO2e from industry.

17.26 The RBKC emissions can be broken into the following sectors:

• 123 ktCO2e from transport;

• 201 ktCO2e from domestic sources;

• 49 ktCO2e from the public sector;

• 246 ktCO2e from commercial; and

• 66 ktCO2e from industry.

Future Baseline

17.27 The future baseline as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception that the seventh carbon budget (2038-2042) has been considered as part of the future baseline.

Sensitive Receptors

17.28 The sensitive receptors set out in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Assessment of Effects

17.29 The assessment has considered the proposed amendments that have informed the updated technical assessments of the EIA (see Preface for a summary list) and the WLCA for the Amended Proposed Development, including the amended floorspace area schedule for the Detailed and Outline Components

Extreme weather events: Windstorms and wind gusts

Receptor:

Buildings and infrastructure Windstorms could cause the wind gust conditions and damage or disrupt on-site crane operations.

As discussed within ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description, mitigation measures for operating tall cranes during high winds would be considered within the detailed CEMP alongside the requirement for the main contractor to implement all relevant conditions on operating procedures, and other commitments relevant.

With respect to cranes and hoists, a Crane Management Strategy would be secured by means of an appropriately worded planning condition and agreed in consultation with London Heathrow Airport and the contractor prior to construction The Crane Management Strategy should contain information on minimising crane damage.

Significance of effect presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid Additional Mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid

17.31 The conclusions of the CCR assessment demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

In-Combination Climate Impact

17.32 The conclusions of the ICCI assessment demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.16 remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development All references to July 2024 ES Volume 1 chapters should now also include 2024 ES Volume 1A addendum chapters.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

17.33 An assessment of the GHG emission demolition and construction embedded mitigation measures presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

17.34 An updated high-level breakdown of the Early Phases demolition and construction stage GHG emissions for the Amended Proposed Development has been presented in Table 17A.17R

Table 17A.17R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary

8 Based on the UKCP18 Projections.

Table 17A.17R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary Amended Proposed Development Component Stage of Lifecycle

Table 17A.18A: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Stage Climate Change Resilience Assessment

Climate Change Trend

Increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events:

Intense rainfall events

Climate (Change) Impact on Receptor

Receptor: Buildings, infrastructure and human health

Wetter winters and increased frequency of intense rainfall events could result in the overwhelming of drainage assets. This could result in secondary impacts such as localised flooding or mobilisation of contamination.

Embedded Design and Mitigation Measures

Sustainable Drainage Systems (‘SuDs’) would be used, including re-use of rainwater, permeable paving, rain gardens, swales and geocullular tanks As discussed in the Sustainability Statement, SuDs would reduce runoff rates by 96 %.

Significance of Effect Additional Mitigation Required

Significance of effect presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid Additional Mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid

17.35 The Early Phases demolition and construction stage would contribute:

• 0.00491 % of the 2023-2027 UK carbon budget;

• 0.01472 % of the 2028-2032 UK carbon budget;

• 0.01853 % of the 2033-2037 UK carbon budget

• 0.00000 % of the 2038-2042 UK carbon budget.

• 0.02282 % of the 2023-2027 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.07599 % of the 2028-2032 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.07555 % of the 2033-2037 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.00000 % of the 2038-2042 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.42734 % of the 2023-2027 regional London carbon budget; and

• 1.41099 % of the 2028-2032 regional London carbon budget

17.36 Due to the low percentage of the GHG emissions in comparison to the UK, London and projected buildings sector carbon budgets and the embedded mitigation measures, the Early Phases is assessed as compatible with the budgeted, science-based 1.5 °C trajectory in terms of rate of emissions reduction.

17.37 The conclusions of the GHG emissions assessment demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

Completed Development Effects

Climate Change Resilience

17.38 The CCR completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.18 remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the updates presented in Table 17A.18A All references to July 2024 ES Volume 1 chapters should now also include 2024 ES Volume 1A addendum chapters. Likewise in respect of separate planning reports referred to, e.g. Sustainability Statement.

17.39 The conclusions of the CCR assessment completed development stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

In-Combination Climate Impact

17.40 The potential ICCI completed development effects presented in the July 2024 Table 17.19 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development All references to July 2024 ES Volume 1 chapters should now also include 2024 ES Volume 1A addendum chapters.

17.41 The conclusions of the ICCI assessment completed development stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

17.42 The embedded mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

17.43 An updated high-level breakdown of GHG emissions of the Amended Proposed Development associated with the completed development stage of the Early Phases is presented in Table 17A 20R

Table 17A.20R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary Amended Proposed Development Component Stage of Lifecycle

Table 17A 20R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary

Amended Proposed Development Component Stage of Lifecycle

*Minus figure indicates sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere

17.44 When comparing the “do something” scenario against the “do minimum” scenario (existing development remains in operation), the Early Phases completed development stage would contribute:

• - 0.00041 % of the 2023-2027 UK carbon budget;

• 0.00101 % of the 2028-2032 UK carbon budget;

• 0.00499 % of the 2033-2037 UK carbon budget.

• 0.01163 % of the 2038-2042 UK carbon budget.

• - 0.00192 % % of the 2023-2027 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.00521 % of the 2028-2032 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.02032 % of the 2033-2037 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.06043 % of the 2038-2042 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• -0.03593 % of the 2023-2027 regional London carbon budget; and

• 0.09670 % of the 2028-2032 regional London carbon budget.

17.45 Note that the minus value reported is due to the “do minimum” scenario emissions being higher than the “do something” scenario

17.46 Due to the low percentage of the GHG emissions in comparison to the UK, London and projected buildings sector carbon budgets and the embedded mitigation measures, the Early Phases is assessed as compatible with the budgeted, science-based 1.5 °C trajectory in terms of rate of emissions reduction, as well as the net zero strategies set out by the GLA, LBHF and RBKC. Note that minus value is due to the “do minimum” scenario emissions being higher than “do something” scenario for those respective years.

17.47 The conclusions of the GHG emissions assessment completed development stage presented in the July 2024 ESremain valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Contextualisation of GHG Emissions against Carbon Budgets

17.48 Contextualisation of emissions against the carbon budget has been calculated by comparing the “do something” scenario against the “do minimum” scenario (existing development remains in operation), i.e., the net GHG emissions contribution of the Early Phases to the carbon budgets. The results are presented Table 17A.21R

17.49 The total emissions of the Early Phases have been compared against the national, regional, and building sector carbon budgets. This is because the receptor of the assessment is considered to be the global atmosphere, which crosses boundaries between boroughs. However, at a local level, the emissions attributed to each borough have been compared to their respective carbon budgets. Update to the contextualisation of emissions against the carbon budget has been calculated. The UK Government has published its seventh carbon budget. Therefore, the method for assessing net GHG includes a comparison against the seventh carbon budgets in the July 2024, with the updates presented in Table 17A.21R

Table 17A.21R: Amended Contextualisation of Estimated Early Phases Net GHG Emissions against UK, Building Sector, Regional and Local Carbon Budgets

17.51 However, the contribution against the introduced RBKC Carbon Budget for 2038-2042 is high As further justification for the valid July 2024 conclusion that effects are not considered significant, and in response to feedback received on other planning applications, the following is noted to provide context and reference to established benchmarks:

• In the absence of national thresholds, the IEMA guidance states that thresholds from any relevant guidance may be utilised. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 39 indicates that a development would require annual GHG assessments if direct Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions exceed 25,000 tCO₂e per year. As the annual GHG emissions for the Early Phases have been reported as 13,085 tCO₂e per year, this threshold has not been exceeded; and

• This benchmark, along with the mitigation and enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES, supports the conclusion that the Early Phases is assessed as compatible with the budgeted, science-based 1.5 °C trajectory in terms of rate of GHG emissions reduction, as well as the net zero strategies set out by the GLA, LBHF and RBKC. Therefore, the scale of effect of the Early Phases presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid

All Phases

Demolition and Construction Effects

Climate Change Resilience

17.52 The CCR demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.22 remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

In-Combination Climate Impact

17.53 The potential ICCI demolition and construction effects presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.23 remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

17.54 The conclusions of the ICCI assessment demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

17.55 Information on demolition and construction embedded mitigation measures associated with the All Phases are presented in ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description. Embedded mitigation relevant to the GHG assessment includes all mitigation previously listed for the Early Phases. the following measures therefore are additive and in addition to those previously set out for the Early Phases.

17.56 A high-level breakdown of the demolition and construction stage GHG emissions are presented in Table 17A 24R. The GHG emissions have been broken down into life cycle stages as specified in PAS2080

Table 17A 24R: Amended All Phases Demolition and Construction Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary Amended Proposed

17A 24R: Amended All Phases Demolition and Construction Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary

17.57 When comparing the “do something” scenario against the “do minimum” scenario (existing development remains in operation), the amended All Phases demolition and construction stage would contribute:

• 0.00551 % of the 2023-2027 UK carbon budget;

• 0.01683 % of the 2028-2032 UK carbon budget;

• 0.02388 % of the 2033-2037 UK carbon budget;

• 0.01615 % of the 2038-2042 UK carbon budget;

• 0.02561 % of the 2023-2027 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.08687 % of the 2028-2032 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.09736 % of the 2033-2037 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.08386 % of the 2038-2042 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.47962 % of the 2023-2027 regional London carbon budget; and

• 1.61294 % of the 2028-2032 regional London carbon budget.

17.58 Due to the low percentage of the GHG emissions in comparison to the UK, London and projected buildings sector carbon budgets and the embedded mitigation measures, the All Phases is assessed as compatible with the budgeted, sciencebased 1.5 °C trajectory in terms of rate of emissions reduction.

17.59 The conclusions of the GHG emissions assessment demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development Effects

Climate Change Resilience

17.60 The CCR completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.25 remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development All references to July 2024 ES Volume 1 chapters should now also include 2025 ES Volume 1A addendum chapters.

In-Combination Climate Impact

17.61 The potential ICCI completed development effects presented in the July 2024 ES Table 17.26 remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development. All references to July 2024 ES Volume 1 chapters should now also include 2025 ES Volume 1A addendum chapters.

Table

17.62 The conclusions of the ICCI assessment completed development stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

17.63 The embedded mitigation presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

17.64 An updated high-level breakdown of GHG emissions of the Amended Proposed Development associated with the completed development stage of the All Phases is presented in Table 17.27R

Table 17A.27R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary Amended Proposed Development Component Stage of

Table 17A.27R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Greenhouse Gas Assessment Summary

*Minus figure indicates sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere

17.65 The amended All Phases completed development stage would contribute:

• - 0.00041 % of the 2023-2027 UK carbon budget;

• 0.00097 % of the 2028-2032 UK carbon budget;

• 0.00508 % of the 2033-2037 UK carbon budget;

• 0.01377 % of the 2038-2042 UK carbon budget;

• - 0.00192 % of the 2023-2027 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.00500 % of the 2028-2032 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.02073 % of the 2033-2037 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• 0.07154% of the 2038-2042 projected building sector carbon budgets;

• - 0.03589 % of the 2023-2027 regional London carbon budget;

• 0.09293 % of the 2028-2032 regional London carbon budget;

17.66 Due to the low percentage of the GHG emissions in comparison to the UK, London, projected buildings sector, LBHF and RBKC carbon budgets and the embedded mitigation measures, the Early Phases is assessed as compatible with the budgeted, science-based 1.5 °C trajectory in terms of rate of emissions reduction, as well as the net zero strategies set out by the GLA, LBHF and RBKC.

17.67 The conclusions of the GHG emissions assessment demolition and construction stage presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Contextualisation of GHG Emissions against Carbon Budgets

17.68 Update to the contextualisation of emissions against the carbon budget has been calculated The UK Government has published its seventh carbon budget Therefore, the method for assessing net GHG includes a comparison against the seventh carbon budgets in the July 2024, with the following updates presented in Table 17A.28A.

Table 17A.28A: Contextualisation of Estimate All Phases Net GHG Emissions against UK, Building Sector, Regional and Local Carbon Budgets Carbon

Table 17A.28A: Contextualisation of Estimate All Phases Net GHG Emissions against UK, Building Sector, Regional and Local Carbon Budgets

Carbon

(MtCO2e)

17.69 The predicted percentage GHG emissions is low in comparison to the UK, London and Building Sector carbon budgets.

17.70 However, the contribution against the introduced RBKC Carbon Budget for 2038-2042 is high. As further justification for the valid July 2024 conclusion that effects are not considered significant, and in response to feedback received on other planning applications, the following is noted to provide context and reference to established benchmarks:

• In the absence of national thresholds, the IEMA guidance states that thresholds from any relevant guidance may be utilised. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 310 indicates that a development would require annual GHG assessments if direct Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions exceed 25,000 tCO₂e per year. As the annual GHG emissions for the Early Phases have been reported as 13,085 tCO₂e per year, this threshold has not been exceeded; and

• This benchmark, along with the mitigation and enhancement measures presented in the July 2024 ES, supports the conclusion that the Early Phases is assessed as compatible with the budgeted, science-based 1.5 °C trajectory in terms of rate of GHG emissions reduction, as well as the net zero strategies set out by the GLA, LBHF and RBKC. Therefore, the scale of effect of the Early Phases presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid.

Assessment of Residual Effects

Early Phases

17.71 Offsetting payments in line with GLA (£95/tonne) as noted within the July 2024 ES remain valid. The new LBHF carbon off-setting pricing guidance, in addition to the GLA guidance, would be considered and the appropriate payment agreed through the Section 106.

17.72 No enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Early Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

17.73 Offsetting payments in line with GLA (£95/tonne) as noted within the July 2024 ES remain valid. The new LBHF carbon off-setting pricing guidance, in addition to the GLA guidance, would be considered and the appropriate payment agreed through the Section 106.

17.74 No enhancement measures are relevant for the Amended Proposed Development. Accordingly, the July 2024 ES remains valid for the All Phases development scenario of the Amended Proposed Development.

Summary of Residual Effects

17.75 The summary of residual effects as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Cumulative Effects

Intra-Project Effects

17.76 The intra-project cumulative effects as previously reported in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development and are presented in Chapter 18A: Cumulative Effects.

Inter-Project Effects

17.77 Consistent with the approach adopted and scope agreed for the July 2024 ES, no consideration has been given to interproject cumulative effects.

Summary of Assessment

Post-Application Submission

14.1 Following submission, RBKC, LBHF and Waterman post-application submission review comments were provided by RBKC, LBHF and Waterman. These review comments have required minor clarification updates to the assessment

14.2 An assessment of the Amended Proposed Development was also undertaken. In particular, consideration was given to the proposed amendments to the land use floorspace area schedules; the Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA); and technical assessments within the 2025 ES Addendum.

17.78 In respect of carbon budgets, the Climate Change Committee released its statutory report Seventh Carbon Budget in February 2025 in which the UK Government will have to set its seventh carbon budget by June 2026, covering emissions up to 2042. The proposed seventh carbon budget is 535,000,000 tCO2e. However, the budget is not expected to cover all of the demolition and construction stage for the All Phases development scenario which is expected to occur between Q4 2024 and Q2 2043 (19 years). Accordingly, GHG emissions have also been compared with the Tyndall Centre carbon budgets for the years 2038 - 2042.

17.79 Furthermore, account was taken of Local Planning Authorities (LBHF and RBKC) and national carbon dioxide emissions statistics for 2023

17.80 The assessments have concluded that the July 2024 ES reported climate effects (climate resilience, in-combination and greenhouse gas emissions) remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

17.81 For the Early Phases, the:

• provisional estimate of demolition and construction GHG emissions from the raw materials required, transport and demolition and construction processes are predicted to be 524,081 tCO2e (a small increase); and

• provisional estimate of completed development stage operational GHG emissions over the 60 year design life (including end of life) are predicted to be 836,009 tCO2e (a small increase).

17.82 For the All Phases, the:

• provisional estimate of demolition and construction GHG emissions from the raw materials required, transport and demolition and construction processes are predicted to be 723,240 tCO2e (a small increase); and

• provisional estimate of completed development stage operational GHG emissions over the 60 year design life (including end of life) are predicted to be 1,199,408 tCO2e (a small reduction)

17.83 No additional or different significant climate effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

18A CUMULATIVE EFFECTS

Introduction

18.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum reports on the likely cumulative effects of the Amended Proposed Development. The assessment examines whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the cumulative assessment of the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development. In particular, the assessment considers the conclusions of the technical assessments within the 2025 ES Addendum Volumes 1A and 2A

18.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 18: Cumulative Effects of the July 2024 ES. The majority of the document remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but has been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

18.3 The introduction as presented in Chapter 18 of the July 2024 ES Volume 1 remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Inter-Project Cumulative Effects

18.4 The inter-project cumulative effects approach presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

18.5 Following the July 2024 ES submission, the agreed list of cumulative schemes has been maintained and updated to account for the status of each scheme and for any new potential, qualifying schemes.

18.6 Details of the most up-to-date list of cumulative schemes considered in the EIA of the Amended Proposed Development is presented in Table 2A 1A of ES Chapter 2A: EIA Process and Methodology of this ES Volume.

18.7 Consistent with the approach adopted in the July 2024 ES, inter-project cumulative effects have been addressed in each technical chapter of ES Volume 1A (Chapters 6A-17A) and Volume 2A (Chapters 1A-2A), as appropriate. In addition, qualitative consideration has been given to the ESB scheme and the Mund Street School site scheme. Consistent with the July 2024 approach, to avoid significant repetition, information on the potential combined and additive effects of the Amended Proposed Development together with and in addition to cumulative schemes have not been presented within this chapter of the ES.

Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

18.8 The potential for amended intra-project cumulative effects of the Amended Proposed Development is considered within this chapter.

Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

Assessment Approach

18.9 The assessment approach as presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development However, the assessment has been based on the reported residual effects of the Amended Proposed Development within ES Volume 1A and ES Volume 2A to determine the potential for interactions between effects and consequently the potential for significant intra-project cumulative effects to arise.

Assessment Results

18.10 Figures 18A.1R to 18A 2R present the results of the potential for interactions of qualifying individual reported residual effects on receptors for the Early Phases demolition and construction stage and completed development stage, respectively. Figures 18A.3R and 18A.4R present the same results for the All Phases.

18.11 Additional or different effects from those presented within the July 2024 ES have been demarcated within the figures by a pink bold boundary for clarity and ease of understanding Any amendments to the ‘Likely Residual Effects’ column of the figures have been presented in blue for updated text and green for new text as previously set out

18.12 Each of the technical assessments in ES Volume 1A and 2A has been undertaken on the basis of a reasonable worstcase. Therefore, the intra-cumulative effects reported within this chapter would be greater than the effects that would in reality be likely to arise at any given receptor group

Early Phases

Demolition and Construction

18.13 As shown in Table 18A.1R, Early Phases demolition and construction stage effect interactions are likely to arise at the following receptors and receptor groups:

• Existing off-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects, as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional general population human health effects with regard to dust and vehicle emissions, extreme weather events due to climate change, and noise and vibration;

Additional general population human health effects with regard to changes in community identity due to disruption to, or loss of, on-site uses and facilities, as well as community participation and interaction due to reduction in the psychosocial environment;

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in accidents and safety, and parking and servicing demand at the additional 70 links assessed; and

Different noise and vibration effects due to generation of demolition and construction stage road traffic noise as a result of the removal of the Mund Street/Aisgill Avenue access point

Temporary demolition and construction effects on existing off-site users would be predominantly adverse, with beneficial effects arising on account of changes in community identity, further to the Applicant’s community participation and interaction processes to date.

Additional adverse dust and vehicle emissions, climate change adaptation extreme weather events and noise and vibration effects in respect of the general population, have been derived from review and interpretation of the air quality, noise and vibration and climate assessments, which were previously reported in the July 2024 ES. The effects would be managed in accordance with the embedded mitigation presented within the July 2024 ES.

Additional adverse community identity and community participation effects in respect of the general population would be minimised by providing meanwhile uses where practically possible to activate the Site and to be of benefit for the local community. Furthermore, the Applicant is committed to and would continue its ongoing community engagement during the delivery programme.

Figure 18A.1R: Amended Early Phases Demolition and Construction Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

The addendum transport assessment focuses on 70 additional links. Therefore, whilst the reported additional effects remain broadly consistent with those reported in the July 2024 ES, the effects would occur at new and additional road links In this respect, additional minor to moderate adverse: accidents and safety effects have been identified at Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove, Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road, Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl, Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl, Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G, Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G, Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road; and parking and servicing effects have been identified at Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access and Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close.

The Early Phases peak demolition and construction stage traffic flows have been assessed utilising the same method as was set out in the July 2024 ES. Due to this, the reported effects are higher than would be experienced in reality

Road traffic noise would have moderate adverse effects on receptors: R04 - (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers)); and R06 - (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified in regard to effects from road traffic noise, accidents and safety or parking and servicing demand.

Whilst additional and different adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. The additional health effects are not considered to be significant at a population level and have been informed by effects previously reported by the air quality, noise and vibration and climate assessments. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional vulnerable population human health effects with regard to changes in community identity due to disruption to, or loss of, on-site uses and facilities, as well as community participation and interaction due to reduction in the psychosocial environment;

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in accidents and safety, and parking and servicing demand at the additional 70 links assessed; and

Different noise and vibration effects due to demolition and construction stage road traffic noise

Temporary demolition and construction effects on vulnerable existing off-site users would be predominantly adverse, with beneficial effects arising through changes in community identity further to the Applicant’s community participation and interaction processes to date.

Additional adverse community identity and community participation effects in respect of the vulnerable population would be minimised by providing meanwhile uses where practically possible to activate the Site and to be of benefit for the local community. Furthermore, the Applicant is committed to and would continue its ongoing community engagement during the delivery programme.

The additional and different adverse effects would be as reported above for the general population existing off-site users, including residential uses with regard to transport and accessibility and noise and vibration.

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified in regard to effects from road traffic noise, accidents and safety or parking and servicing demand

Whilst additional and different adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. The additional health effects are not considered to be significant at a population level and have been informed by effects previously

reported by the air quality, noise and vibration and climate assessments. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Existing and future off-site pedestrians in respect of the following:

Transport and accessibility effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in severance; pedestrian delay, amenity, fear and intimidation as a result of the additional 70 links assessed

Temporary demolition and construction effects relating to existing and future off-site pedestrians would be adverse. No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified.

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

Whilst additional adverse transport effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, the effects would be at new and different locations. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Existing and future off-site cyclists in respect of the following:

Transport and accessibility as effects reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in severance, cyclist delay, amenity, fear and intimidation at the additional 70 links assessed

Temporary demolition and construction effects relating to existing and future off-site cyclists would be adverse. These adverse effects would be as reported above for existing and future off-site pedestrians.

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified

Whilst additional adverse transport effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, the effects would be at new and different locations. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Existing drivers on the network in respect of the following:

Transport and accessibility, daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Different transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in driver delay at existing junctions and corridors; and

Additional parking and servicing demand at existing junctions and at the additional 70 links assessed

Temporary demolition and construction effects relating to existing drivers on the network would be adverse. The following different and additional transport and accessibility effects have been identified:

Negligible to minor adverse junction driver delay at North End Road / Lillie Road, Lillie Road / Bus Layover, Lillie Road / Seagrave Road, A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road, North End Road / Beaumont Avenue, A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road and Warwick Road / Fenelon Place;

Major adverse effects on corridor driver delay at Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd, Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd and Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.;

Moderate to major adverse effects on corridor driver delay at Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.;

Minor to moderate effects on corridor driver delay at Route 1 EB - Along A4 and Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd.; and

Minor to moderate adverse effects on accidents and safety at Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove, Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road, Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w

Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl, Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl, Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G, Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220

Redcliffe G and Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified

Accordingly, on the basis of the considerations above, the Amended Proposed Development residual intra-project cumulative effects are likely to be temporary, medium- to long-term Moderate Adverse (significant) for existing drivers on the network.

• Future on-site users including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Human health, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional human health effects with regard to dust and vehicle emissions, extreme weather events due to climate change, and noise and vibration on the general population; and

Different noise and vibration effects due to generation of demolition and construction stage road traffic noise

Temporary demolition and construction effects on future on-site users including residential uses would be predominantly adverse, with beneficial effects arising on account of changes in community identity further to the Applicant’s community participation and interaction processes to date.

The additional health effects would be managed in accordance with the embedded mitigation presented within the July 2024 ES.

Road traffic noise would have additional moderate adverse effects on receptor: R04 - 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified in regard to effects from road traffic noise.

Whilst additional and different adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. The additional health effects are not considered to be significant at a population level and have been informed by effects previously reported by the air quality, noise and vibration and climate assessments. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Vulnerable future on-site users including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Human health, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Different noise and vibration effects due to generation of demolition and construction stage road traffic noise.

Temporary demolition and construction effects on vulnerable existing on-site users would be predominantly adverse, with beneficial effects arising through changes in community identity further to the Applicant’s community participation and interaction processes to date.

The additional and different adverse effects would be the same as those reported above for the general population existing on-site users, including residential uses with regard to transport and accessibility and noise and vibration.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified in regard to effects from road traffic noise.

Whilst different adverse road traffic noise effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

• Existing and future on-site pedestrians in respect of the following:

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. Therefore, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Existing and future on-site cyclists in respect of the following:

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. However, it is noted that the residual intra-project cumulative effect was incorrectly reported within the July 2024 ES and should have been reported as temporary, medium- to long-term Moderate Adverse (significant) for existing drivers on the network.

• Existing on-site habitats

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. Therefore, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

• Existing off-site ecological receptors including designated sites, in respect of the following: air quality and ecology effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and different ecology effects at the on-site WLL SINC in the event that the Bioline is not delivered.

However, the different WLL SINCs effects are in respect of an alternative scenario assessment to the previously assessed decking over of the WLL SINC and therefore not additive. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Existing Rail Infrastructure (including below grade)

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. Therefore, the residual intra-project cumulative effects remain as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Figure 18A.2R: Amended Early Phases Completed Development Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

18.14 As shown in Table 18A 2R, Early Phases completed development stage interactions are likely to arise at the following receptors and receptor groups:

• Existing off-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources, daylight sunlight and overshadowing and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional general population human health effects with regard to the delivery of new homes, air quality, provision of adaptation measures to extreme weather events due to climate change, and noise and vibration

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to pedestrian and cyclist fear and intimidation, accidents and safety and parking and servicing demand on the additional 70 links assessed; and Different noise and vibration effects with regard to road traffic noise

Effects would be both beneficial and adverse, with additional beneficial health effects arising due to the delivery of new homes (moderate beneficial) and climate adaptations measures to extreme weather events (local level, minormoderate beneficial and site level, moderate beneficial).

Additional adverse health effects in respect of air quality, noise and vibration, have been derived from review and interpretation of the air quality, noise and vibration assessments, which were previously reported. The additional adverse health effects would be managed in accordance with the embedded mitigation presented within the July 2024 ES.

The addendum transport assessment focuses on 70 additional links. Therefore, whilst the effects reported remain broadly consistent with those reported in the July 2024 ES, the effects would occur in the following new and additional locations:

Minor to moderate adverse parking and servicing effects at Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close; and Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road; and

Moderate adverse road traffic noise effects have been reported for receptors R04 - (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers)) and R06 - (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

No other additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified.

Whilst both beneficial and adverse additional and different effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources, daylight sunlight and overshadowing and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional human health effects with regard to delivery of new homes;

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to pedestrian and cyclist fear and intimidation, accidents and safety and parking and servicing demand on the additional 70 links assessed; and

Different noise and vibration effects with regard to road traffic noise

Effects would be both beneficial and adverse, with additional beneficial health effects arising due to the delivery of new homes (major beneficial).

The additional transport effects and different noise and vibration effects would be the same as those reported above for existing off-site users, including residential uses

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified.

Whilst both beneficial and adverse additional and different effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. However, it is noted that the residual intra-project cumulative effects were incorrectly reported within the July 2024 ES and should have been reported as permanent, long-term Moderate Adverse (significant) for vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses.

• Future on-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional human health effects with regard to delivery of new homes, air quality, provision of adaptation measures to extreme weather events due to climate change and noise and vibration;

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to pedestrian and cyclist fear and intimidation and parking and servicing demand on the additional 70 links assessed;

Different noise and vibration effects with regard to road traffic noise and exposure to completed development commercial activity noise; and

Different wind microclimate effects with regard to balconies and rooftop/terrace level amenity.

Effects would be both beneficial and adverse, with different and additional beneficial effects arising due to the delivery of new homes (moderate beneficial) and climate adaptations measures to extreme weather events (minor to moderate beneficial at ‘Local’ level and moderate beneficial at ‘Site’ level).

Additional minor to moderate adverse parking and servicing effects have been identified at Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close; and Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

Road traffic noise would also have additional moderate adverse effects on receptors: R04 - (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers)); and R06 - (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

Different minor beneficial effects have been identified at L01, L02 and L07 of Plot EC05 (probe location 184) with regard to balcony users and probe locations 406, 407, 483, 484 with regard to rooftop/terrace level amenity

No other additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified

Whilst both beneficial and adverse additional and different effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

• Vulnerable future on-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional human health effects with regard to delivery of new homes to vulnerable users;

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to pedestrian and cyclist fear and intimidation and parking and servicing demand on the additional 70 links assessed;

Different noise and vibration effects with regard to road traffic noise and exposure to completed development commercial activity noise; and

Different wind microclimate effects with regard to balconies and rooftop/terrace level amenity.

Effects would be both beneficial and adverse, with new and additional beneficial effects arising due to the delivery of new homes (major beneficial).

As previously set out the addendum transport assessment focuses on 70 additional links and the reported effects would occur in these new and additional locations.

The additional and different transport effects, different noise and vibration effects and different wind effects would be the same as those reported for existing on-site users, including residential uses

No other additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified

Whilst both beneficial and adverse additional and different effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Existing and future on-site pedestrians in respect of the following:

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. Therefore, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Existing and future on-site cyclists in respect of the following:

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. Therefore, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Existing and future off-site pedestrians in respect of the following:

Transport and accessibility effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to severance, pedestrian delay, amenity, fear and intimidation at the additional 70 links assessed

Effects on existing and future off-site pedestrians, would be adverse.

The July 2024 package of additional mitigation has been updated and extended following stakeholder engagement. As previously set out, the addendum transport assessment focuses on 70 additional links and the reported effects would occur in these new and additional locations.

Whilst additional adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Existing and future off-site cyclists in respect of the following:

Transport and accessibility effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in severance, cyclist delay, amenity, and fear and intimidation at the additional 70 links assessed.

Effects relating to existing and future off-site cyclists would be adverse. These adverse effects would be as reported for existing and future off-site pedestrians.

The additional transport effects would be the same as those reported above for existing off-site pedestrians. The additional mitigation would also be the same as those reported above for existing off-site pedestrians.

Whilst additional adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

• Existing and future drivers on the network in respect of the following:

Transport and accessibility, and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Different transport and accessibility effects with regard to changes in driver delay; and

Additional transport and accessibility effects with regard to parking and loading demand on the additional 70 links assessed.

Effects relating to existing and future drivers on the network would be adverse. The following different and additional transport and accessibility effects have been identified:

Negligible to minor adverse junction driver delay at North End Road / Lillie Road, Lillie Road / Bus Layover, Lillie Road / Seagrave Road, A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road, North End Road / Beaumont Avenue, A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road and Warwick Road / Fenelon Place;

Major adverse effects on corridor driver delay at Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd, Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd and Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.;

Moderate to major adverse effects on corridor driver delay at Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.;

Minor to moderate effects on corridor driver delay at Route 1 EB - Along A4 and Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd.;

Negligible to minor adverse effects on accidents and safety at Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link, Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St, Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate, Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews, Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns, Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl, Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres, Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street, Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St, Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road and Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd; Minor adverse effects on accidents and safety at Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link, Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd, Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road, Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl, Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Link Court, Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street, Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent, Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street, Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street, Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road, Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane, Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove, Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road, Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl, Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl, Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G, Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G and All links except for Links 82, 86, 101, 109,

126 and 127, Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove, Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road, Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl, Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl, Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G, Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G and Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road;

Minor adverse effects on parking and servicing demand at Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres and Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd; and

Minor to moderate adverse effects on parking and servicing demand at Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App, Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close and Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified.

Accordingly, on the basis of the considerations above, and taking into account that the additional mitigation package has prioritised pedestrians and cyclists, it is inevitable that drivers on the road network would be adversely affected. Therefore, the Amended Proposed Development residual intra-project cumulative effects are likely to be permanent, long-term Moderate Adverse (significant) for existing drivers on the network.

• Existing off-site ecological receptors including designated sites in respect of the following:

Air quality, and ecology effects as reported in the July 2024 ES which remain valid.

Different ecology effects at the on-site WLL SINC in the event that the Bioline is not delivered.

Additional ecology effects at Brompton Cemetery SINC

However, the different WLL SINCs effects are in respect of an alternative scenario assessment to the previously assessed decking over of the WLL SINCs. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Additional and different effects relating to existing off-site ecology receptors including designated sites would be both beneficial and adverse:

Minor adverse at Brompton Cemetery SINC due to increased visitor footfall; and

Minor adverse at WLL SINCs due to loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution in the event that the Bioline is not delivered

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified in respect of the potential intra-cumulative effects.

Whilst different and additional minor adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

• Existing and future on-site habitats in respect of the following:

Air quality, and ecology effects as reported in the July 2024 ES which remain valid; and

Different ecology effects at the on-site WLL SINC in the event that the Bioline is not delivered.

Effects relating to existing on-site ecology receptors including designated sites would be beneficial and adverse.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES has been identified

Whilst different minor beneficial have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

• Existing Rail Infrastructure (including below grade),

No additional or different residual effects have been identified. Therefore, the residual intra-project cumulative effects remain as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid.

Conclusions

18.15 In respect of the July 2024 ES, there was an incorrect assignment of significance to some of the Minor to Moderate Adverse effects for the Early Phases at paragraphs 18.20 and 18.21

18.16 The correct reporting, is as follows, taking into account the assessment presented in this addendum chapter:

• Demolition and construction significant adverse intra-cumulative effects in respect of:

vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development;

vulnerable existing on-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development;

existing and future on-site pedestrians, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development; existing and future on-site cyclists, which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development; and existing and future drivers on the local highway network which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development

All Phases

Demolition and Construction

• Completed Development significant adverse intra-cumulative effects in respect of:

vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development; and

existing and future drivers on the local highway network, which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Completed Development significant beneficial intra-cumulative effects in respect of:

Future on-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the for the Amended Proposed Development; and

Vulnerable future on-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the for the Amended Proposed Development.

Figure 18A.3R: Amended All Phases Demolition and Construction Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

18.17 As with the July 2024 ES, the majority of demolition and construction stage intra-cumulative effects for the All Phases would be consistent with the reported Early Phases demolition and construction stage intra-cumulative effects. The development of LBD within the All Phases would introduce additional receptor locations and vary the effects reported for some of the receptors and receptor groups. However, in the majority of cases this would not materially change the overall scale of effects experienced at those receptors. Where effects would vary this has been set out in the following bullet points.

18.18 As shown in Table 18A.3R, the following additional All Phases demolition and construction effect interactions are likely to arise at the following receptors/receptor groups:

• Existing off-site users, including residential uses:

Human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects, as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional and different effects as reported for the Early Phases above; and Different noise and vibration effects with regard to road traffic noise

In addition to the temporary demolition and construction effects reported for the Early Phases, road traffic noise would have moderate adverse effects on receptors: R20 (LBHF: 1 to 55 Kensington Hall Gardens), R21 (LBHF: 86 to 98 North End Road (even numbers), 179 to 203a North End Road (odd numbers) and R22 (LBHF: 71-177 North End Road and Famous Three Kings PH).

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES and the Early Phase assessment above has been identified.

Whilst additional and different temporary adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses:

Human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional and different effects as reported for the Early Phases above; and

Different noise and vibration adverse effects as reported for existing off-site users, including residential uses

Transport and accessibility effects would be carefully managed during the demolition and construction programme and through the implementation of the CEMP and CTLP.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES and the Early Phase assessment above has been identified.

Whilst different temporary adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES, they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the July 2024 assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Future on-site users including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Human health, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Additional and different effects as reported for the Early Phases above.

Whilst additional and different temporary adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Vulnerable future on-site users including residential, in respect of the following:

Human health, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid; and

Additional and different effects as reported for the Earl Phases above

Whilst additional and different temporary adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Completed Development

Figure 18A.4R: Amended All Phases Completed Development Intra-Project Cumulative Effects

18.19 As with the July 2024 ES, the majority of completed development stage intra-cumulative effects for the All Phases would be consistent with the reported Early Phases completed development stage intra-cumulative effects. The development of LBD within the All Phases would introduce additional receptor locations and vary the effects reported for some of the receptors and receptor groups. However, in the majority of cases this would not materially change the overall scale of effects. Where effects would vary this has been clearly set out in the following bullet points.

18.20 As shown in Table 18A.4R, the following additional All Phases completed development stage effect interactions are likely to arise at the following receptors/receptor groups:

• Existing off-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following: Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources, daylight sunlight and overshadowing and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

Additional and different effects as reported for the Early Phases.

Different noise and vibration effect with regard to road traffic noise. Different daylight, sunlight and overshadowing effects with regard to changes in daylight and sunlight levels.

In addition to the effects highlighted for the Early Phases, road traffic noise would also have: moderate adverse effects at R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 14 m of Lillie Road access road kerb); major adverse effects at Hogarth Road dwellings (RBKC); and major beneficial effects at Earls Court Gardens dwellings (RBKC).

In addition to the effects highlighted for the Early Phases, changes in daylight would have: moderate to major adverse effects at Flats 21-35 - Kensington Hall Gardens and 42 Philbeach Gardens; moderate adverse effects at Whiteley's Cottages, 21-35 Mornington Avenue 7 and Garsdale Terrace; and minor adverse effects at 147-160 Gibbs Green and Flats 1-88 Fairburn House.

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES and the Early Phase assessment above has been identified.

Whilst additional and different beneficial and adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented for the Early Phases remain valid for the All Phases Amended Proposed Development.

• Vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, in respect of the following:

Human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, ground conditions, water resources and daylight sunlight and overshadowing effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid;

The additional and different effects would be as reported for the existing off-site users, including residential uses, above

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES and the Early Phase assessment above has been identified.

Whilst additional and different beneficial and adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Future on-site users, including residential uses in respect of the following:

Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid.

The additional and different effects would be as reported for the existing off-site users, including residential uses, above

No additional mitigation beyond that set out within the July 2024 ES and the Early Phase assessment above has been identified.

Whilst additional and different beneficial and adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment. Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

• Vulnerable future on-site users, including residential, in respect of the following:

Socio-economics, human health, transport and accessibility, air quality, noise and vibration, water resources and wind microclimate effects as reported in the July 2024 ES, which remain valid.

The additional and different effects would be as reported for the existing on-site users, including residential uses. Whilst additional and different beneficial and adverse effects have been identified compared to those set out in the July 2024 ES they are not considered to be of such scale as to change the findings of the previous assessment.

Accordingly, the residual intra-project cumulative effects as presented within the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development

Conclusions

18.21 In respect of the July 2024 ES, there was an incorrect assignment of significance to some of the Minor to Moderate Adverse effects for the All Phases at paragraphs 18.26

18.22 The correct reporting, is as follows, taking into account the assessment presented in this addendum chapter:

• Demolition and construction significant adverse intra-cumulative effects in respect of:

vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development;

future on-site users including residential users, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development; vulnerable future on-site users including residential users, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development;

existing and future on-site pedestrians, which remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development; existing and future on-site cyclists, which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development; and existing and future drivers on the local highway network which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Completed Development significant adverse intra-cumulative effects in respect of:

vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses, which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development; and

existing and future drivers on the local highway network, which is an additional effect for the Amended Proposed Development.

• Completed Development significant beneficial intra-cumulative effects in respect of:

Future on-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the for the Amended Proposed Development; and

Vulnerable future on-site users, including residential uses, which remains valid for the for the Amended Proposed Development.

19A SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS

Introduction

19.1 This chapter of the 2025 ES Addendum summarises the amended additional mitigation measures, the amended enhancement measures and the amended residual effects identified in the technical assessments of ES Volume 1A (Chapters 6A-17A) and ES Volume 2A (Chapters 1A-2A) The chapter reports on whether the Amended Proposed Development would result in additional or different significant environmental effects to those presented in the July 2024 ES for the Proposed Development.

19.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with Volume 1, Chapter 19: Summary of Additional Mitigation and Residual Effects of the July 2024 ES. The majority of this document remains unchanged for the Amended Proposed Development but it has been updated, where required. Context and validation text are presented in black, updated text in blue and new text in green Where select amendments have been made to tables and figures, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘A’ (e.g. Table 1A.1A) for the table /figure to be read in conjunction with the original; where material updates have been required, titles have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘R’ (e.g. Table 1A.1R) for the original table/figure to be replaced/disregarded; and where entirely new tables and figures have been required, these have been denoted by the letter suffix ‘N’ (e.g. Table 1A.1N).

Additional Mitigation and Enhancement

19.3 The aim of the EIA as presented in the July 2024 ES, remains valid for the Amended Proposed Development.

Additional Mitigation

19.4 The approach presented in the July 2024 ES remains valid; however reference should be made to ES Chapter 3A: Alternatives and Design Evolution and ES Chapter 4A: Amended Proposed Development Description and ES Chapter 5A: Amended Demolition and Construction Description for embedded mitigation measures in respect of the Amended Proposed Development.

19.5 Table 19.1 of the July 2024 ES remains valid with the exception of the following which are either amended or no longer valid:

• additional mitigation for completed development building services noise in terms of maximum sound power limits per roof plant area; and

• additional mitigation package for transport and accessibility.

19.6 Where additional or different additional mitigation has been identified, these have been summarised in Table 19A.1A

Table 19A.1A: Amended Summary of Proposed Additional Mitigation

Topic Proposed Additional Mitigation

Demolition and Construction

Air Quality Early Phases

• Annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future on-site receptors. Therefore, to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-20231 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030, mitigation can be secured

1 London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, 2017. Air Quality Action plan 2018-2023. London. LBHF.

Table 19A.1A: Amended Summary of Proposed Additional Mitigation

Topic Proposed Additional Mitigation

by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the completed development, at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance. This mitigation would be subject to further technical and feasibility studies and would be agreed in consultation with LBHF and RBKC but could comprise, for example, filtration on mechanical ventilation systems.

All Phases

• Annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future onsite receptors. Therefore, to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the completed development, at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance. This mitigation would be subject to further technical and feasibility studies and would be agreed in consultation with LBHF and RBKC but could comprise, for example, filtration on mechanical ventilation systems.

Completed Development

Transport and Accessibility Early Phases

Pedestrians

• The July 2024 additional pedestrian mitigation remains valid with the exception of the following:

• A4 West Cromwell Road - The proposals at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction have been refined to respond to the amended Warwick Road Corridor alternative cycle access strategy and to account for the S106 contributions secured from the 100 West Cromwell Road cumulative scheme to introduce a Healthy Streets improvement. The updated junction proposals would mitigate the Amended Proposed Development’s effects and are intended to be secured in the scenario that the alternative proposals (to be developed and delivered by TfL) and funded by 100 West Cromwell Road for the junction, do not come forwards before the completion of the Early Phases.

• Lillie Road crossings - Following stakeholder feedback, a mitigation scheme for the Lillie Road/North End Road has been developed. This focuses on improvements to pedestrian priority. The layout would involve placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• The following additional mitigation are proposed (although noted that these are captured in the Movement and Access parameter plan, but subject to third party agreement and have therefore not been assessed as embedded mitigation):

• Earls Court Road - Following stakeholder feedback, a scheme for Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road has been developed. This proposal involves bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms of the junction that are currently uncontrolled, into the control of the traffic signal junction.

• Cluny Mews - An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews would require a stepped connection alongside a lift to overcome the level difference in this area. A concept for how this access could be achieved is shown in Figure 6 of the TAA. This would involve constructing a set of steps and lift on land outside of the control of the Applicant. The link would deliver a pedestrian connection. Delivery of this link would be subject to third party agreement.

Table 19A.1A: Amended Summary of Proposed Additional Mitigation

Topic Proposed Additional Mitigation

• If this connection is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided. This would provide a set of steps and lift therefore provide pedestrian connectivity.

Cyclists

• The July 2024 additional cyclists mitigation remain valid with the exception of the following:

• Following stakeholder feedback the previously proposed two-way cycle track on Warwick Road has been removed from the mitigation package. Instead, the following alternative cycle accesses have been developed for trips originating from/destinated to the east and north associated with the Amended Proposed Development:

Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road to the south for access to Quietway 15 and trips to/from the east.

Cluny Mews (subject to third party agreement) with an improvement scheme providing onward connectivity to the north and east.

Connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road with an improvement scheme providing onward connectivity to the north and east.

Connection to Fenelon Place through the basement of 100 West Cromwell Road.

• Lillie Road / Old Brompton Road Corridor - The July 2024 additional mitigation proposals for the cycle improvements on Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders (most notably the revisions around Plot EC22 (introduction of limits of deviation on Development Zones, Maximum Building Lines and Public Realm parameter plan). In addition, RBKC has now constructed the pedestrian and cycle crossing at the Old Brompton Road junction with Kempsford Gardens and therefore the improvements would be designed to tie into this scheme.

• Lillie Road / North End Road Junction - Following stakeholder feedback a mitigation scheme for the Lillie Road/North End Road has been developed. This focuses on improvements to cycle priority. The layout would involve placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• The following additional mitigation are proposed at Cluny Mews (although noted that these are captured in the Movement and Access parameter plan, but subject to third party agreement and have therefore not been assessed as embedded mitigation) -

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews would require a stepped connection alongside a lift to overcome the level difference in this area. A concept for how this access could be achieved is shown in Figure 6 of the TAA. This would involve constructing a set of steps and lift on land outside of the control of the Applicant. The link would deliver a cycle connection. Delivery of this link would be subject to third party agreement.

• If this connection is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided. This would provide a set of steps and lift therefore provide cycle connectivity.

Bus Improvements

• The July 2024 additional bus improvements mitigation remain valid with the exception of the following:

• A review of the design of the Lillie Road Bus Layover with the aim of developing an illustrative layout that can be agreed in principle with the Transport Stakeholders and secured as part of the S106.

Station Improvements

• The July 2024 additional station improvements mitigation remain valid with the exception of the following:

• TfL has requested that a Station Option Study (commensurate with TfL’s Pathways Stage 2 Option Study) is prepared for West Brompton station. The study is currently underway; however, the principles of the mitigation strategy remain as agreed in principle and as set out in the July 2024 ES.

Table 19A.1A: Amended Summary of Proposed Additional Mitigation

Topic Proposed Additional Mitigation

All Phases

Pedestrians

• The July 2024 additional pedestrian mitigation remain valid with the exception of the addition of the amended additional mitigation presented in the Early Phases, as well as the following additional mitigation:

• A4 West Cromwell Road - A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue - Figure 70 and Figure 71 of the TA set out the reconfiguration proposals for parking on Beaumont Avenue. The parking that is currently half-on-half-off the carriageway will be relocated into a full size parking bay on the northern side of the carriageway to maximise carriageway space. Beaumont Avenue itself would be realigned at its eastern end to align with the new access road.

• Beaumont Avenue - To assist in maximising highway capacity and enhancing pedestrian connectivity it is proposed that the pedestrian crossing located immediately north of the Beaumont Avenue junction with North End Road is relocated. This would require the closure of Baron’s Court Road to general traffic. It would also tie into the area of public realm proposed to facilitate the creation of an additional entrance to West Kensington Station. Completed development served from Beaumont Avenue would only come forwards once the LBD has been vacated. Closure of Baron’s Court Road to general traffic would require a traffic regulation order and separate consultation by LBHF. To give further comfort that this mitigation is appropriately designed, it is proposed that this measure falls within the monitor and manage strategy that is set out within Section 8 of the TAA. Whilst the principles of the mitigation are set out, the monitor and manage strategy would allow for a dynamic review of the proposed design in response to any changes in the future years.

Cyclists

• The July 2024 additional cyclists mitigation remain valid with the exception of the addition of the amended additional mitigation presented in the Early Phases, as well as the following additional mitigation:

• A4 West Cromwell Road - A cycle crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Warwick Road Corridor, alternative cycle access via:

Connection across the A4 West Cromwell Road via a new pedestrian and cycle crossing connecting with Edith Villas;

Beaumont Avenue where an enhanced crossing facility connecting with Barons Court Road is proposed; and

• Beaumont Avenue - Figure 70 and Figure 71 of the TA set out the reconfiguration proposals for parking on Beaumont Avenue. The parking that is currently half-on-half-off the carriageway would be relocated into a full size parking bay on the northern side of the carriageway to maximise carriageway space. Beaumont Avenue itself would be realigned at its eastern end to align with the new access road.

Bus Improvements

• The July 2024 additional cyclists mitigation remain valid with the exception of the addition of the amended additional mitigation presented in the Early Phases.

Station Improvements

• The July 2024 additional cyclists mitigation remain valid with the exception of the addition of the amended additional mitigation presented in the Early Phases and the following:

• A Station Option Study (commensurate with TfL’s Pathways Stage 2 Option Study) for West Kensington station. The study is currently underway, however, the principles of the mitigation strategy remain as agreed in principle and as set out in the July 2024 ES.

Vehicle Users

• North End Road/Beaumont Avenue – It is proposed to relocate the crossing point further north to provide additional space for vehicles turning right out of Beaumont Avenue to wait prior to the stop line for the pedestrian crossing which is currently located immediately to the north of the unction.

Table 19A.1A: Amended Summary of Proposed Additional Mitigation

Topic Proposed Additional Mitigation

Air Quality Early Phases

• Annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future on-site receptors. Therefore , to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 2018-2023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the operational phases of the completed development, for at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance.

All Phases

• Annual mean NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 are predicted to be close to or exceeding WHO AQG levels at future onsite receptors. Therefore to align with the objectives of the LBHF Air Quality Action Plan 20182023 which commits LBHF to meeting the WHO AQG levels by 2030 mitigation can be secured by condition whereby annual mean WHO 2021 Air Quality Guideline levels for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 would be used as trigger levels for the identification of locations where mitigation may be necessary for the completed development, at land use classes where annual mean air quality objectives should apply as detailed in Box1-1 of Defra LAQM.TG(22) guidance.

Table 19A.1A: Amended Summary of Proposed Additional Mitigation

Topic Proposed Additional Mitigation

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out prior to each phase being implemented and submitted at the RMA stage. This assessment would comprise the following:

• Baseline noise monitoring at the NSRs most likely to be affected by each phase (considered appropriate given the long timeline before all of the Early Phases are completed, to account for any changes in background sound that occur as result of other development on-site and within the study area);

• Definition of appropriate building services and operational noise limits using the results of the above monitoring and through consultation with the LPAs;

• Assessment of noise from all proposed building services and operational noise sources within the phase; and

• Definition of appropriate mitigation such that the limits defined for that phase are not exceeded at all NSRs.

• Compliance with the assessments detailed above could then be demonstrated through commissioning noise monitoring at completion of each phase.

Enhancement Measures

Noise and Vibration

Early Phases

• The additional mitigation for completed development building services noise in terms of maximum sound power limits per roof plant area, as presented in the July 2024 ES, is no longer valid.

• For Phase 1, an assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed on-site. This assessment would demonstrate that the noise limits presented in Table 11A.3N (or alternative suitable noise limits if these are agreed separately with the LPAs) are not exceeded at all receptors. The assessment would provide details of the noise control measures to be installed for the phase.

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out prior to each phase being implemented and submitted at the RMA stage. This assessment would comprise the following:

Baseline noise monitoring at the NSRs most likely to be affected by each phase (considered appropriate given the long timeline before all of the Early Phases are completed, to account for any changes in background sound that occur as result of other development on-site and within the study area);

Definition of appropriate building services and operational noise limits using the results of the above monitoring and through consultation with the LPAs;

Assessment of noise from all proposed building services and operational noise sources within the phase; and

Definition of appropriate mitigation such that the limits defined for that phase are not exceeded at all NSRs.

• Compliance with the assessments detailed above could then be demonstrated through commissioning noise monitoring at completion of each phase.

All Phases

• The additional mitigation for completed development building services noise in terms of maximum sound power limits per roof plant area, as presented in the July 2024 ES, is no longer valid.

• For Phase 1, an assessment of building services and operational noise would be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed on-site. This assessment would demonstrate that the noise limits presented in Table 11A.3N (or alternative suitable noise limits if these are agreed separately with the LPAs) are not exceeded at all receptors. The assessment would provide details of the noise control measures to be installed for the phase.

19.7 Table 19.2 of the July 2024 ES remains valid. No additional or different enhancement measures have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development

Residual Effects

19.8 This section summarises the amended likely residual environmental effects of the Amended Proposed following the adoption and inclusion of the amended additional mitigation measures presented in Table 19.1A.

19.9 Reference should be made to ES Chapters 6A-17A in ES Volume 1A and Chapters 1A-2A in ES Volume 2A for a detailed description of amended likely significant residual environmental effects.

19.10 The following amendments to receptors are relevant to the assessment of the Amended Proposed Development:

• 70 additional links for transport and accessibility;

• One additional receptor for air quality in respect amended traffic data and seven additional receptors in respect of the life safety back-up emergency generators;

• One removed receptor (177 Northend Road) for daylight, sunlight, overshadowing, as this receptor was confirmed as a non-residential use post-application submission; and

• Four additional receptors for built heritage.

Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

19.11 The residual demolition and construction effects presented in Table 19.3 of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the amended residual effects presented in Table 19A 3A

Early Phases

19.12 The significant beneficial environmental effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. No additional or different significant environmental effects have been identified for the Amended Proposed Development

19.13 The following additional or different significant adverse environmental effects have been identified for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development and are highlighted in bold red text in Table 19A 3A

• Driver delay on account of corridor delay at:

Route 1 EB - Along A4 receptor;

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd receptor;

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd receptor;

Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd receptor; and

Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd receptor

• Changes in accidents and safety at:

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove receptor;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road receptor;

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App receptor;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl receptor;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl receptor;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G receptor;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G receptor; and

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road receptor.

• Changes in parking and servicing demand:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App receptor;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access receptor; and

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close receptor

• Generation of demolition and construction road traffic noise at:

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place kerb); and

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place kerb).

19.14 From the assessment of intra-project cumulative effects, two additional significant adverse effects have been identified during the Early Phases demolition and construction stage in respect of the following receptors and receptor groups:

• Existing and future on-site cyclists2; and

• Existing and future drivers on the local highway network

All Phases

19.15 The significant beneficial environmental effects presented in the July 2024 ES remain valid. No additional or different significant environmental effects have been identified.

19.16 The following additional or different significant adverse environmental effects have been identified for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development and are highlighted in bold red text in Table 19A.3A

• Driver delay on account of corridor delay at:

Route 1 EB - Along A4 receptor;

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd receptor;

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd receptor;

Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd receptor; and

Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd receptor

• Changes in accidents and safety at:

Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove receptor;

Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road receptor;

3

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App receptor;

Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl receptor;

Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl receptor;

Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G receptor;

Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G receptor; and

Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road receptor

• Changes in parking and servicing demand:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App receptor;

Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access receptor; and

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close receptor.

• Generation of demolition and construction road traffic noise at:

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place kerb);

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place kerb)

R20 (LBHF: 1 to 55 Kensington Hall Gardens);

R21 (LBHF: 86 to 98 North End Road (even numbers), 179 to 203a North End Road (odd numbers);

R22 (LBHF: 71-177 North End Road and Famous Three Kings PH); and

NR06 (LBHF: Mannequin Factory, 11-19 Beaumont Avenue).

19.17 From the assessment of intra-project cumulative effects, two additional or different significant adverse effects have been identified during the All Phases demolition and construction stage in respect of the following receptors and receptor groups:

• Existing and future on-site cyclists3; and

• Existing and future drivers on the local highway network.

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Change Mitigation and Adaptation

Transport Early Phases

• Link 86 - Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Receptor

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road

• Lillie Road / Bus Layover

• Lillie Road / Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place Change in Driver Delay

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 WB - Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 1 EB - Along A4

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Link 86 - Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road .

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

(significant)

identified Moderate (significant)

identified Major (significant)

required Negligible (not significant)

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects Topic Receptor

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in Fear and Intimidation

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 4 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• All links except for 75, 76, 82,86 ,96, 101 and 109

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

All Phases

• Link 86 - Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Receptor

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road;

• Lillie Road / Bus Layover;

• Lillie Road / Seagrave Road;

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road;

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue;

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road;

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place.

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 WB – Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd Change in Driver Delay

• Route 1 EB - Along A4;

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd. Change in Driver Delay

• Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd; and

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd.

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd.

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G;

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

in Driver Delay

in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay None required Negligible

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay None required Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 86 – Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd ;

• Link 113 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 - Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 - Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 - A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 - Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road.

• Link 74 - A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 75 - Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 - Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 92 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 - Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 - Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 - Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 - Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 - Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 - Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 - Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 - North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 - North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 - North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 - North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

• Link 87 - North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 - North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 - North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 - Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 - Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 - A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 - Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 - Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 4 A3212 Grosvenor Road b/w Vauxhall Bridge and Ayelsford Street

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 93 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street Change in

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 98 Holland Park Gardens b/w Addison Road and Holland Park Avenue

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 117 Brompton Road b/w Draycott Avenue and Crescent Place

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

(not significant)

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 79 Fulham Road / North End Road junction link

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 113 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 123 Finborough Road b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 121 Holland Road b/w Kensington High St and Napier Road

• All links except for 75, 76, 82,86 ,96, 101 and 109.

• Link 75 Sispara Gdns b/w West Hill Rd and Valonia Gdns

• Link 76 Amerland Rd b/w A3 West Hill and Valonia Gdns

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 96 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Nevern Sq and EC Access

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects Topic Receptor

Noise and Vibration

Early Phases

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb) Generation of demolition and construction stage road traffic noise

All Phases

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 15 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

R20 (LBHF: 1 to 55 Kensington Hall Gardens)

R21 (LBHF: 86 to 98 North End Road (even numbers), 179 to 203a North End Road (odd numbers)

R22 (LBHF: 71-177 North End Road and Famous Three Kings PH)

NR06 (LBHF: Mannequin Factory, 11-19 Beaumont Avenue)

other receptor groupings

Ecology Early Phases

Designated Sites

Designated Sites

All Phases

Designated Sites

Designated Sites

Built Heritage Early Phases

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Bioline delivery at WLL SINCs - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution and loss of connectivity.

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Retention of WLL SINCs - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution.

Brompton Cemetery and Bioline delivery at WLL SINCs - Loss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution and loss of connectivity.

Brompton Cemetery and WLL SINCs RetentionLoss of habitat and extent, potential for pollution

required. Significant at up to Local Level Minor (not significant)

required Significant at Site Level Negligible (not significant)

required. Significant at up to Local Level Minor (not significant)

required Significant at the Local Level Negligible (not significant)

9-18, 11A and 18A Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building) Visibility of Early Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Negligible (not significant)

Table 19A.3A: Amended Demolition and Construction Residual Effects

Receptor

1-8, Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building)

Cheyne Conservation Area

Royal Hospital Conservation Area

All Phases

9-18, 11A and 18A Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building)

1-8, Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building)

Cheyne Conservation Area

Visibility of Early Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of Early Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of Early Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of All Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of All Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of All Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of All Phases demolition and construction activity in the setting of the heritage receptor.

* - = Adverse; + = Beneficial; +/- = Neutral;

D = Direct; I = Indirect;

P = Permanent; T = Temporary;

R = Reversible; IR= Irreversible;

St = Short-term; Mt = Medium-term; Lt = Long-term.

Completed Development Residual Effects

19.18 The residual completed development effects presented in Table 19.4 of the July 2024 ES remain valid for the Amended Proposed Development, with the exception of the amended residual effects presented in Table 19A.4A

Early Phases

19.19 The following additional or different significant beneficial environmental effects have been identified for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development and are highlighted in bold green text in Table 19A 4A:

• Provision of new homes for vulnerable groups

19.20 From the assessment of intra-project cumulative effects, no additional or different significant beneficial effects are identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

19.21 The following additional or different significant adverse environmental effects have been identified for the Early Phases of the Amended Proposed Development and are highlighted in bold red text in Table 19A.4A.

• Driver delay on account of corridor delay at:

Route 1 EB - Along A4 receptor;

(not significant)

(not significant)

(not significant)

Negligible/Minor/Moderate/Major

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd receptor;

Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Road receptor;

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Road receptor;

Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd receptor; and

Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Road receptor

• Changes in parking and servicing demand at:

Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App receptor;

Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close receptor; and

Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road receptor

• Effects due to completed development stage road traffic noise:

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 12 m of Empress Place kerb); and

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 12 m of Empress Place kerb).

19.22 From the assessment of intra-project cumulative effects, two additional or different significant adverse effect has been identified during the Early Phases completed development stage in respect of the following receptors and receptor group:

• Vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses4; and

• Existing and future drivers on the local highway network.

All Phases

19.23 The following additional or different significant beneficial environmental effects have been identified for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development and are highlighted in bold green text in Table 19A.4A:

• Provision of new homes for the general population;

• Provision of new homes for vulnerable groups;

• Generation of completed development stage road traffic noise: Earls Court Gardens dwellings (RBKC).

19.24 From the assessment of intra-project cumulative effects no additional or different significant beneficial effects are identified for the Amended Proposed Development.

19.25 The following additional or different significant adverse environmental effects have been identified for the All Phases of the Amended Proposed Development and are highlighted in bold red text in Table 19A.4A.

• Driver Delay due to Corridor delays at:

Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd receptor;

Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd receptor;

Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd receptor;

Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd receptor;

Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd receptor; and

Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Road receptor

• Generation of completed development stage road traffic noise:

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 14 m of Empress Place kerb);

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 14 m of Empress Place kerb); Hogarth Road dwellings (RBKC);

• Changes in daylight amenity at five receptors when assessed against the contextual BRE Guidelines: Flats 21-35 – Kensington Hall Gardens; Whiteley’s cottages; 21-35 Mornington Avenue; 7 Garsdale Terrace; and 42 Philbeach Gardens.

When the five properties are assessed against the alternative contextual target criteria: Two properties would meet the alternative daylight target criteria and would be acceptable in consideration of context; and

Three properties would substantially meet the alternative daylight target criteria and would be acceptable in consideration of context

• Changes in sunlight amenity at two receptors when assessed against the contextual BRE Guidelines: 42 Philbeach Gardens.

4 In respect of the Early Phases completed development stage, there was an incorrect assignment of significance within the July 2024 ES conclusions for vulnerable existing off-site users including residential uses, which should have been concluded as not-significant. A significant effect on vulnerable existing off-site users, including residents, is anticipated as a result of the Amended Proposed Development.

19.26 The one property would be beyond the alternative target, when assessed against the alternative contextual target criteria

19.27 From the assessment of intra-project cumulative effects, two additional or different significant adverse effect has been identified during the Early Phases completed development stage in respect of the following receptors and receptor group:

• vulnerable existing off-site users, including residential uses; and

• existing and future drivers on the local highway network.

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

Human Health Early Phases

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation – Site level General Population

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Local level General Population

generator emissions, road traffic emissions and air quality neutral

arising from extreme weather events.

arising from extreme weather events.

Noise and Vibration General Population Road traffic noise, building services noise and commercial activities noise

Transport Early Phases

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction Link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

Change in Severance

(not significant)

(not significant)

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction;

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction; Negligible (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

Receptor

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

Change in Severance

Change in Severance

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders.

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction;

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction;

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road

• Lillie Road /Bus Layover

• Lillie Road /Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 WB - Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 1 EB - Along A4

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB – Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• Route 4 SB - Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

in Pedestrian and Cycle Delay

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders.

No additional mitigation for vehicle drivers is proposed. The improvements seek to improve conditions across the study area for pedestrians and cyclists. The increase in delay is due in part to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which inherently add further delay to vehicular journey times.

(not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

(not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road Change in Pedestrian and Cycle Amenity

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders.

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction,

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• Improvements to Lillie Road/North End Road layout, including placing the junction on a raised table with coloured surfacing and then widening the ‘Zebra’ crossings.

• Improvements to Earls Court Road junction with Old Brompton Road - bringing the pedestrian crossings on the western and southern arms under signal control.

• An access point that links St Cuthbert’s Lane to Cluny Mews (subject to third party).

• If Cluny Mews is not achieved an alternative connection to the A4 West Cromwell Road through Plot EC22 would be provided.

• Lillie Road and Old Brompton Road cycle designs have been updated to take account

(not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

of feedback received from the Transport Stakeholders.

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 78 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Vanston Place

• Link 83 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and Chestnut Court

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 94 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 97 Old Brompton Road b/w Bute Street and junction

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 116 Brompton Road b/w South Terrace and Crescent Place

• Link 119 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Tregunter Road and Redcliffe Square

• Link 122 Redcliffe Gardens adj St Lukes Church

• Link 124 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Cathcart Road and Tregunter Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 103 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Queens Gate

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 108 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and Boltons Pl

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 118 Finborough Road b/w Cathcart Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 120 Draycott Ave b/w Brompton Rd and Walton St

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 77 North End Road b/w Dawes Road and Fulham Road junction link

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 92 Cremorne Road b/w Edith Grove and Lots Road

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 84 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Chestnut Link Court

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 99 Holland Road b/w Napier Road and Addison Crescent

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 112 Finborough Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Redcliffe Street

• Link 114 Redcliffe Gardens b/w Fulham Road and Cathcart Road

• Link 125 Warwick Road b/w Old Brompton Road and Rich Lane

• Link 80 North End Road b/w Halford Road and Waltham Grove

• Link 81 North End Road b/w Sedlescombe Road and Halford Road

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

Change in Accidents and Safety None required Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Change in Accidents and Safety None required Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects Topic Receptor

• Link 104 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Queens Gate and Cranley Pl

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• All links except for Links 82, 86, 101, 109, 126 and 127

Change in parking and servicing demand

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd Change in parking and servicing demand

• Link 109 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and Eardley Cres

• Link 127 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w EC Access and Penywern Rd

• Link 82 Lillie Rd b/w Telephone Pl and Empress App

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 126 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and West Cromwell Road

Local Bus stops

• West Kensington Estate Stop BT

• West Kensington Stop S

• West Kensington Stop T

• Earls Court Road Stop A

• West Brompton Station Stop O

• Earls Court Road Stop C

• West Brompton Station Stop P

• West Kensington Estate Stop BS

• West Cromwell Road Stop E

• Empress State Building Stop BB

Empress State Building Stop BA

All Phases

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

Change in public transport demand and capacity

required

• Inclusion of a commencing bus stop within the layout for Route 190.

• Financial contributions, secured by S106 agreement or condition (if required) for improvements to bus services and/or bus infrastructure.

• Reconfiguration of the Lillie Road Bus Layover

(not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

Key Junctions

• North End Road / Lillie Road

• Lillie Road / Bus Layover

• Lillie Road / Seagrave Road

• A4 West Cromwell Road / North End Road

• North End Road / Beaumont Avenue

• A4 West Cromwell Road / Warwick Road

• Warwick Road / Fenelon Place

• Old Brompton Road / Eardley Crescent

• Old Brompton Road / Warwick Road

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction;

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction;

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings;

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements,

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

Corridor Delay

• Route 1 EB – Along A4

• Route 1 WB – Along A4

• Route 2 SB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 5 WB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Route 2 NB - Along B317 North End Rd

• Route 3 NB - Along A3220 Warwick Rd

• Route 4 SB – Along A3220 Earls Ct Rd

• Route 5 EB - Along A3218 Lillie Rd

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

Change in driver delay

Change in driver delay

No additional mitigation for drivers is proposed. The improvements set out in the additional mitigation sections primarily seek to improve access across the area for pedestrians and cyclists. The increase in delay are due in part to the introduction of measures that improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists which inherently add further delay to vehicular journey times.

(not significant)

(significant)

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G Change in pedestrian and cycle delay

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

Change in pedestrian and cycle delay

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Change in pedestrian and cycle delay Minor (not significant)

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements,

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

Change in pedestrian and cyclist amenity

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings.

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road.

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required).

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north.

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections. Negligible to Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

Change in pedestrian and cyclist amenity

• Widening of crossing on western side of A4 West Cromwell Road/Warwick Road junction

• Widening of crossings and incorporating into traffic signal staging of northern and western arm crossings at Warwick Road/ Old Brompton Road junction

• Improvements to Lillie Road, including widening of the bridge, public realm and crossings

• Improved pedestrian crossing facilities at the A4 West Cromwell Road junction with North End Road in the form of widened pedestrian crossings

• A new pedestrian and cycle crossing across the A4 West Cromwell Road between the junction with North End Road and Warwick Road

• To be secured by means of S106 agreement or condition (if required)

• A pedestrian crossing on the A4 to connect the Amended Proposed Development with Edith Villas for onward pedestrian and cycle connections to/from the north

• Beaumont Avenue parking reconfigured and the pedestrian crossing on North End Road moved north to facilitate crossing movements

• Warwick road corridor cycle strategy, using Cluny Mews and / or EC22 connections.

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 Change in pedestrian fear and intimidation None required Negligible to Minor (not significant)

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

Change in pedestrian fear and intimidation None required. Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• Link 85 North End Road b/w Star Road and Archel Road

• Link 88 North End Road south of Archel Road

• Link 89 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and Bramber Road

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close

• Link 129 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Avonmore Road

• Link 130 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w Olympia Way and Addison Bridge Place

• Link 134 North End Road / Lillie Road dbl mini internal link

• Link 138 Harwood Road b/w Fulham Road and Fulham Town Hall Change in accidents and safety None required

• Link 90 North End Road b/w Thaxton Road and just south of Archel Road

• Link 91 A3218 Old Brompton Rd junction link

• Link 95 A3220 Warwick Rd b/w Earls Ct Sq and A3218

• Link 102 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Kendrick Pl and Bute St

• Link 105 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Gdns and Cranley Mews

• Link 107 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Roland Gdns

• Link 131 North End Road b/w Fitz-James Avenue and A315 Hammersmith Road

• Link 133 North End Road b/w North End Crescent and Gunterstone Road

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd

• Link 115 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Cranley Pl and Kendrick Pl

• Link 135 North End Road b/w Lillie Road and south of Bramber Road

• Link 87 North End Road b/w Star Road and Mund Street

• Link 100 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Kensington High Street

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

• Link 132 A315 Hammersmith Road b/w North End Road and Earsby Street

• Link 137 A304 Fulham Road b/w Jerdan Place and North End Road

• Link 141 New Kings Road b/w Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217 and E of Perrymead Street

• Link 143 New Kings Road b/w Peterborough Road and Parsons Green

• Link 106 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Drayton Gdns and Boltons Pl

• Link 110 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w Coleherne Rd and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 111 A3218 Old Brompton Rd b/w The Little Boltons and A3220 Redcliffe G

• Link 128 North End Road b/w Edith Road and Mortimer House access

• Link 136 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Jerdan Place

• Link 139 A304 Fulham Road b/w Harwood Road and Waterford Road

• Link 140 New Kings Road b/w Harwood Road and Bagleys Lane

• Link 142 New Kings Road b/w Bagleys Lane and Wandsworth Bridge Rd A217

• All links except for Link 86 and Link 101 Change in parking and servicing demand

• Link 86 Star Rd b/w Vereker Rd and North End Rd Change in parking and servicing demand None required

to Minor (not significant)

• Link 101 Warwick Road b/w Fenelon Place and Beckford Close Change in parking and servicing demand None required Minor to Moderate (not significant)

Local Bus stops

• West Kensington Estate Stop BT

Change in public transport demand and capacity

• Inclusion of a commencing bus stop within the layout for Route 190.

(not significant)

• Earls Court Road Stop A Negligible (not significant)

• Earls Court Road Stop C

• West Kensington Stop S

• West Brompton Station Stop O

• West Cromwell Road Stop E

• West Brompton Station Stop P

• Empress State Building Stop BB

• Empress State Building Stop BA

• West Kensington Estate Stop BS

• West Kensington Stop T

• Financial contributions, secured by S106 agreement or condition (if required) for improvements to bus services and/or bus infrastructure.

• Reconfiguration of the Lillie Road Bus Layover.

(not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects Topic Receptor

Noise and Vibration

Early Phases

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 12 m of Lillie Road access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 12 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

All other receptor groupings

All receptor groupings outside of the Site boundary

Effects due to completed development stage road traffic noise

All proposed sensitive receptors

Effects due to completed development stage building services and operational noise

All Phases

R04 (LBHF: 16 to 26 Lillie Road (even numbers) and 2 Empress Place dwellings within 14 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

R06 (LBHF: 28 to 40 Lillie Road (even numbers) dwellings within 14 m of Empress Place access road kerb)

Hogarth Road dwellings (RBKC)

Earls Court Gardens dwellings (RBKC)

Existing and future noise effects on proposed on-site completed development stage receptors

• For Phase 1, further assessment to be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed onsite to demonstrate the presented limits are not exceeded at all receptors.

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of building services and operational noise to be carried out prior to each phase being implemented, and submitted at the RMA stage

• To be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Updated Assumptions in Updated Site Suitability Assessment to be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Further assessment of noise ingress to be carried out as part of the detailed and technical design for each proposed Outline Component Development Zone, to be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Mitigation measures in the form of appropriate specification of the building envelope and provision of appropriate ventilation methods to be implemented as required to avoid significant effects within each proposed residential building.

of completed development stage road traffic noise

or Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects Topic Receptor

All other receptor groupings

All receptor groupings outside of the Site boundary

Effects due to completed development stage building services and operational noise

• For Phase 1, further assessment to be carried out prior to building services and operational noise sources being installed on site to demonstrate the presented limits are not exceeded at all receptors.

• For Phase 2 onwards, an assessment of building services and operational noise to be carried out prior to each phase being implemented, and submitted at the RMA stage

• To be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

(not significant)

All proposed sensitive receptors

Existing and future noise effects on proposed on-site completed development stage receptors

• Updated Assumptions in Updated Site Suitability Assessment to be secured by means of appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Further assessment of noise ingress to be carried out as part of the detailed and technical design for each proposed Outline Component Development Zone, to be secured through appropriately worded planning conditions.

• Mitigation measures in the form of appropriate specification of the building envelope and provision of appropriate ventilation methods to be implemented as required to avoid significant effects within each proposed residential building.

or Minor (not significant)

Ecology Early Phases

Designated Sites

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Bioline Delivery at WLL SINCsHabitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement. Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects. None required Significant at the Local Level Minor (not significant)

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Retention of WLL SINCs –Habitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement. Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects

None required

at the Local Level Minor (not significant)

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

Designated Sites

Designated Sites

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Bioline Delivery at WLL SINCsHabitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement. Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects.

Brompton Cemetery SINC and Retention of WLL SINCs –Habitat degradation and pollution, habitat creation and enhancement. Overshadowing, Wind and Lighting Effects

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects Topic Receptor

Wind Early Phases

Proposed off-site thoroughfare users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages)

Proposed on-site Entrance users (Plots EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, Plot EC05 F&B southern frontage and Plot EC06 nursery, Plot EC06 north-west corner

Sitting to walking use (Windiest season)

Sitting to strolling use (Windiest season)

Proposed off-site entrance users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages) Sitting to standing use (Windiest season)

Proposed off-site bus stop or train station users (North End Road) Sitting to standing use (Windiest season)

Proposed off-site ground level seating users (Lillie Langtry pub, Prince of Wales pub) Sitting use (Summer season)

Proposed on-site balcony users (L01 and L02 and L07 of Plot EC05) Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

Proposed on-site rooftop/terrace level mixed use amenity users (L07 terrace on Plot EC05, L26 central private terraces/balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04)

To Major (significant)

(not significant)

301, 302

Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 181, 183, 195, 196, 197, 202

(not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Required

Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe

Required

Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

3, 5, 7

(not significant) for representative probe locations: 184,

Required Minor (not significant) for representative probe locations: 343, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355

Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations:406, 407, 483, 484

All Phases

Proposed off-site thoroughfare users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages) Sitting to walking use (Windiest season) None Required

Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Cottages

Flats 1-30 - Falkland House - Edith Villas

Philbeach Gardens

Table 19A.4A: Completed Development Residual Effects

Topic Receptor

Proposed on-site Entrance users (Plots EC05 and EC06 residential lobby, Plot EC05 F&B southern frontage and Plot EC06 nursery, Plot EC06 north-west corner

Sitting to strolling use (Windiest season)

Proposed off-site entrance users (North End Road and Lillie Road active frontages)

Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 181, 183, 195, 196, 197, 202,

Sitting to standing use (Windiest season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Proposed off-site bus stop or train station users (North End Road) Sitting to standing use (Windiest season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 300, 301, 302

Proposed off-site ground level seating users (Lillie Langtry pub, Prince of Wales pub)

Sitting use (Summer season) None Required Negligible (not significant) for representative probe locations: 3, 5, 7

Proposed on-site balcony users (L01 and L02 of Plot EC05) Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

Proposed on-site rooftop/terrace level mixed use amenity users (L26 central private terraces/ balconies on Plot EC05 and at the north and south corners of L35 on Plot WB04)

Sitting to standing use (Summer season)

1-8, Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building)

9-18, 11A and 18A Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building) Visibility of the Early Phases in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Conservation Area

Hospital Conservation Area

All Phases

9-18, 11A and 18A Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building) Visibility of the All Phases in the setting of the heritage receptor.

1-8, Collingham Gardens SW5 (Grade II* listed building) Visibility of the All Phases in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Cheyne Conservation Area

Royal Hospital Conservation Area

Visibility of the All Phases in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Visibility of the All Phases in the setting of the heritage receptor.

Required

Required

(not significant) for representative probe locations: 343, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355

(not significant) +/-

(not significant) +/-

Volume 1A: Main Environmental Statement Report Addendum Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

No additional terms are relevant for Volume 1A of the August 2025 ES Addendum. Reference should be made to the Glossary of Terms prepared for the July 2024 ES Volume 1, which remains valid.

ABBREVIATIONS

The following additional abbreviations are relevant for Volume 1A of the August 2025 ES Addendum. Reference should also be made to the abbreviations provided for the July 2024 ES Volume 1, which remain valid

AEGL United States Environmental Protection Agency Acute Exposure Guideline Levels

AQFA Air Quality Focus Area

AQG WHO Air Quality Guideline

C&F Cut & Fill

DCI Digital Connectivity Infrastructure

EEA European Environment Agency

EMEP European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme

EWC European Waste Catalogue

IFC International Finance Corporation

MHCLG Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

PAN Published Admission Numbers

PTAL Public Transport Accessibility Level

PCU Passenger Car Unit

RNP Required Navigation Performance

RSRP Reference Signal Receiver Power

rWFD Revised Waste Framework Directive