SYSTEM VALIDATING YOUR INCOMING DATA?
We’d like to think it is, but probably not. Procurement, receiving, CAMO and records management teams do a good job at what they do. But they can only deal with the data they get and what they can find through phone calls, faxes, emails and digging through past files. But what these systems are not doing creates issues in CAMO, in the parts supply chain, in the hangars and in component repair.
Generally, the answer is no, the data and documents are not validated It’s up to the individuals acquiring, repairing, installing or otherwise working with the parts to do the validation work MRO systems do not enable that functionality today How could they? The incoming parts data came from another ERP system at another company That data came from the ERP system of the company who had the part before them, and so on Part documents and data are stored everywhere But the documents and data are not where you need them when you need it and how you need them.
Data errors too often they are carried forward from company to company within the part documentation: It’s called “garbage in, garbage out.
The existing MRO systems allowed this to happen. Many airlines will say – that doesn’t happen to us. But it does.
The FAA reports that 500,000 unapproved aircraft parts are installed on aircraft every year
One line station manager on the west coast says – “I find at least one unapproved part every day”
AOG Technics was an insider They knew where the holes were in the MRO systems and exploited
AOG Technics parts made their way into 125 engines of major airlines + Safran + MRO shops
FAA allows parts to be recorded onto the suspected unapproved parts (SUP) list. It’s hard to search
The industry is not required to report “ scrap ” – is your part one that was previously scrapped?
Is the incident reporting on your part, correct? How do you know?
Has your part flown in a sanctioned location? How do you know?
How does this data get past the MRO systems validations?
Many aircraft parts fall into quarantine when the data, documents and parts do not match. It can take 3-4 days for a part to get through quarantine once it falls into this status. Tens of thousands of parts are in quarantine right now. That is not acceptable. Planes are delayed. MRO is delayed. TAT increases. And worse, parts slip through. Remember the FAA citation earlier.
The Aviation Supply Chain Integrity Coalition studied the issue of part authentication and released their report on improving aircraft parts sourcing and management in response to recent issues around aircraft part documentation The issues that led to this report were the fabrication of aircraft engine part hours and cycles and the associated part documentation Three areas of improvement were reported in the ASCIC report, and we challenge MRO MIS systems designers to close these gaps
SkyThread is ready to support the ASCIC report and its findings and will enable the authentication, verification and traceability of serialized aircraft parts through our industry solution to collect, validate and share aircraft part data over the life of the part. Our cloud-based solution records key data about an aircraft part to provide part data integrity to legitimate movements of parts and to avoid errors or misappropriation of the part status and condition of the part over its life SkyThread's proprietary solutions record, curate, validate and share permissioned data on the ongoing status and condition of parts through -
Birth of the Part (its original manufacture)
1st Use of the Part (assembly on aircraft)
1st Use of the Part (delivered to airline)
Remove / Repair / Install the part in MRO
Return to stock or resell of the part (USM)
Recycling or Scrap of the Part (end of life)
Airworthiness Documents along the way
At every step of the way, SkyThread can capture, and independently validate available data about these aircraft parts, the assemblies (engines / landing systems) and the aircraft We’ll have the ability to independently validate the hours and cycle data This would have helped prevent the AOG Technics aircraft part documentation issues SkyThread will integrate with or embed in your MRO MIS
The Aviation Supplier Association (ASA) proposed creating and maintaining life histories of aircraft parts over 25 years ago. The industry did not follow through. The industry still manually prepares and circulates airworthiness tags with no history on most parts prior to their last removal. Life Limited Parts have some level of reporting, but we ’ ve seen errors coming through this process as well. The ASCIC report suggests that we do more. EASA has also studied this issue and issued their report in late 2024. SkyThread was involved in that study.
Why haven’t these gaps been addressed?
First, the regulators don’t require it That should never be a reason or an excuse I’ve been in this business for 45 years and we know better Second, the MRO IT systems companies tell me that the airline customers are not asking for these improvements. Airlines / MRO have learned to deal with these weaknesses through manual labor – forensics. Until airlines required this validation, we’re left to do manual workarounds and put immense stress on the overworked aircraft technicians to “get it right”. That last point is especially important – we retired the best A&P technicians during the pandemic. Over 25% of current aircraft technicians have 3 years of experience or less. They must be supported with proven life histories of aircraft parts to help them accelerate their learning curve on the evaluation of aircraft parts.
Over the past 40 years, airlines have maintained a core set of information systems to deal with aircraft part numbers – sourcing, procurement, receiving, inspection, installation, health monitoring, removal, repair, restock and installation. Remember, I’ve worked on 5 major airline IT system evaluations, selections or implementations. The airlines have written or acquired over 20 systems that collectively “touch” an aircraft part. Can you imagine trying to keep those systems “in synch”? One system I’ve worked with was written way back in 1978 – code modifications are very complex and think about what an aircraft looked like back then.
Many airlines, MRO and component repair stations are now going through software selections. These systems will be in place for the next 20 years Let’s get it right I’ve talked about data validation of parts coming “into” an airline or MRO, but the struggles exist even within airline operations
Many airlines, MRO and component repair stations are going through MRO MIS software selections and implementations now These systems will be in place for the next 20 years Let’s get it right Can Artificial Intelligence fix this?
Not yet. In aircraft parts, you must have the data available to run AI. If the AI engine is not accessing the MRO / ERP systems of all the actors of all the parts for that part number, engine platform and aircraft platform, it does not have the data. SkyThread has been designed to support this purpose. SkyThread will
Collect the part / fleet data
Validate the part / fleet data
Permission the Data
Anonymize the data
Share the Data
Then you can expose your AI engines to the anonymized data pool. Even the airframers and engine companies struggle with their ability to follow their assets over their life to build a digital data twin at the aircraft and engine level to support parts reliability analysis, spares and repairs demand planning, What’s missing from MRO system validation?
Remember, ASCIC, ASA, AFRA, EASA and others say we can do better. What will that look like?
Sourcing - authentic parts - serial # validation – is this a duplicate serial #, is it recorded as being “somewhere else” in the aviation ecosystem?
Sourcing - validated parts - life history validation – how many times has this serial # been removed from an aircraft in the past, and why?
Sourcing – has this part been previously scrapped?
Sourcing - Is there an incident report on this part?
Receiving - how does the system accelerate receiving inspection results – validating documents (not just accepting them as fact) and validating the data for that aircraft part – not just since its last ARC
Receiving - how does the system accelerate clearing parts out of quarantine that fail the above reviews?
Airworthiness Release Certificate (ARC) - how is the form authenticated if the part is coming to you through a distributor and not from the Tier 1 or Repair Station?
Prior ARC documents – the last ARC is not enough to make full visible decisions about using a part
Removal reports – are the reports and data coming to you with the part, and in a usable, verifiable format?
Removal reports – are you getting these from repaired parts with new ARC?
Service Bulletin Compliance - are the parts compliant with the issued service bulletins?
On wing status and condition of parts - a validated digital data twin for the aircraft and engines
On wing status and condition of parts - validation of ours and cycles manually reported
Life Limited Parts (LLP) - validation to detect gaps in life histories
Asset transition preparation - this work on sale/lease return should take days, not months
Validation with the data from EDI systems (in transit records) for parts removed but not recorded
This is delivered through SkyThread's ability to collect, validate, trace and share the full life history of an aircraft part, from manufactured birth through scrap Recording the end of life or BER of a part is critical to the removal of that part from the supply chain ecosystem The ASA / AFRA teams are also hard at work on the management of USM parts and their data coming off decom aircraft and engines. With SkyThread, the continued use of unapproved parts would be difficult, and the clearing of “good parts” through receiving inspection is efficient and complete.
PARTNERS WITH SMARTCERT AND PROVENAIR TO ENHANCE DOCUMENTATION VISIBILITY IN THE AVIATION AFTERMARKET
Inventory Locator Service, LLC (ILS), ketpla integrations with SmartCert and Prov and q aviation supply chain. SmartCert auto while intelligence (AI) to generate back-to- ( ) parts. ProvenAir are helping suppliers transform documentation visibility from a pain point all while making the buying process faster, trusted, and more transparent across
Solving a Longstanding Documentation Challenge
By integrating SmartCert and ProvenAir with ILS, buyers can now harness cutting-edge technology to revolutionize their purchasing processes. This collaboration actively supports existing goals by enhancing and delivering comprehensive BtB trace insights, thereby empowering buyers with the tools needed to streamline their operations. The partnership builds an environment of trust and transparency, as buyers can confidently verify compliance and traceability, knowing the documentation is both accurate and readily accessible. This innovative approach not only reduces transactional friction but also fosters stronger, more reliable relationships within the aviation aftermarket
A First-of-Its-Kind Partnership
ILS’ partnership with SmartCert and ProvenAir brings seamless certification availability and BtB trace credibility directly into the ILS platform an industry-first solution that eliminates inefficiencies and redefines how companies manage documentation. Suppliers using SmartCert or ProvenAir will now have the integrated company logo displayed alongside their ILS inventory listings, signaling to buyers that documentation for those parts is available. By integrating SmartCert’s powerful cert delivery automation and ProvenAir’s robust BtB trace insights with ILS’s global marketplace, we ’ re setting a new standard for speed, accuracy, and compliance in the aerospace supply chain.
Key benefits include:
Greater Buyer Confidence – Buyers gain greater assurance of compliance while improving sourcing accuracy and better identifying real, ready-to-ship inventories - enhancing efficiency and reducing documentation concerns
Improved Supplier Visibility – ILS
Suppliers advertising parts with SmartCert and ProvenAir integrations stand out against those with minimal part information, leading to more requests and greater market share. Faster Transactions – A standardized digital cert process reduces back-and-forth between buyers and sellers, accelerating purchasing decisions.
Enhanced Compliance & Audit Readiness – Centralized quality documentation simplifies regulatory compliance and streamlines audits for both buyers and suppliers.