ECRWSS PRESORTED STANDARD U.S. POSTAGE PAID DENTON PUBLICATIONS/ NEW MARKET PRESS PO Box 338 Elizabethtown NY 12932 Postal Patron
June 27, 2015
New Haven Select Board member Doug Tolles has been vocal about concerns over solararray construction, and related landscaping, in the Addison County community. Photo by Lou Varricchio
Board concerned about Midd solar-array
NEW HAVEN Ñ New Haven Select Board members Doug Tolles and Jim Walsh recently contacted Town of Middlebury officials to express their concerns over what they believe is inadequate landscaping screening that has been put in place at the new solar array adjacent to Field Days Road. The Middlebury Select Board asked town staff to work with project developer Encore Redevelopment and contractor Peck Electric to investigate further and report back at the Middlebury boardÕ s June 23 meeting.
Published by New Market Press, Inc.
Board supports Shard Villa Road gas project MIDDLEBURY Ñ The Middlebury Select Board signed a letter reaffirming its support for the Renewable Natural Gas Biomethane Project proposed for Shard Villa Road in Salisbury, which is now before the Vermont Public Service Board for review. Under an agreement between Middlebury College and Goodrich Farm in Salisbury, the project would pipe manure-generated methane gas from the farm and through existing Vermont Gas infrastructure to the Middlebury campus, where it would be used to further reduce the college’s consumption of No. 6 fuel oil. The Middlebury Select Board initially signed its letter of support for the project in August 2014. CONTINUED ON PAGE 11
Serving more than 30,000 Readers Weekly
STORM DAMAGE
The remnants of Tropical Storm Bill passed through the Champlain Valley last weekend along with a line of unrelated thunderstorms. Heavy rain soaked Addison and Rutland counties Saturday and again on Sunday night. Gusty winds accompanied the storms. Residents of this house, located at approximately 69 Court St. in Middlebury, woke up June 22 to a veritable forest in their street-facing yard. A large tree split in half and enveloped the lawn, just missing the structure. Photo by Lou Varricchio
Taxpayers feeling after-effects of state’s $63 million tax binge By Bruce Parker
Vermont Watchdog Report Independent company. Independent thinking.
When you need professional printing,
You Need...
Brochures • Posters • Flyers
FOR ALL YOUR
SPECIAL EVENT
PRINTING NEEDS Give Us A Call!
(802) 388-6397 New Market Press is the proud publishers of The Eagle • Green Mountain Outlook
Shawn Shouldice, state director of the National Federation of Independent Business, called Vermont’s new tax hike ‘not sustainable.’
MONTPELIER Ñ ItÕ s been one month since the Vermont Legislature passed $63 million in new taxes, but leaders of the state’s top trade groups say taxpayers are already feeling the after-effects of the binge. While taxes from the legislative session came in bits and pieces, documents from the state’s Joint Fiscal Office list the total damages: $32.3 million in new General Fund revenue, $14 million in property tax increases related to the education bill, $7.6 million for the water quality bill, $3.2 million for the health care bill, $3 million in new Education Fund revenues and a $2.9 million increase for special funds. Gov. Peter Shumlin and House Speaker Shap Smith, D-Morrisville, hailed the session as one of the “most productive,” but trade groups in Vermont say their members are struggling to handle such productivity when it comes to taxes. “We’re always sensitive to taxes we have that our neighbors do not,” Jim Harrison, president at Vermont Retail and Grocers Association, said. Of the various taxes that pertain to grocers and
retailers, Harrison said the soda tax is creating the biggest stir so far. “We had a webinar with the tax department, and it became very clear that itÕ s not soda as you think of soft drinks. ItÕ s sweetened beverages that are less than 51 percent juice, which is a wide variety of juice drink combinations, ice teas, certain flavored waters, energy drinks, soda,” Harrison said. According to Harrison, the webinar conducted for the trade organization on Tuesday confused some members who assumed the sales tax was limited to items like Coke and Pepsi. While Harrison says he knew about the nuances of the tax, the fine print caught some people — including some lawmakers — by surprise. Ò I had a call from a legislator this morning saying, ‘I thought we passed a soda tax.’ Well, you didn’t pass a soda tax, you passed a soft drink tax, and the definition is anything but a soda,” he said. Based on explanations given to the group, the tax applies to flavored waters, but not bottled or seltzer water. It includes iced tea, but not unsweetened iced tea. It covers cranberry juice cocktail, but not orange juice. Since the tax applies to a broad range of sugary drinks, Harrison said it “probably brings in more revenue.” CONTINUED ON PAGE 13