Street September 18, 2014

Page 1

The Daily Princetonian

Thursday September 18, 2014

page s1

READS

Summer’s coming to an end, but that doesn’t mean your leisure reading should, too. In this issue, Street writers share a few of their favorite non-academic reads from recent months.

A LITTLE HISTORY OF THE WORLD E. H. GOMBRICH

LIN KING :: ASSOCIATE STREET EDITOR

Reviewed by

LIN KING

Associate Street Editor

LEAN IN

SHERYL SANDBERG

W

hile interning at the corporate headquarters of a media company this summer, I finally read Sheryl Sandberg’s “Lean In” (only a year after everyone else who cared had read it). At this point, I could tell you I read the last page, set aside my Kindle and vowed to apply Sandberg’s teachings at work, but I would be lying. I was doing a pretty good job of saying yes to all the interesting, challenging projects my supervisors were offering me. I didn’t have children at home to complicate my considerations of a work-life balance — considerations rendered mostly irrelevant by the fact that interns weren’t allowed to work more than 40 hours a week anyway. However, the debates surrounding her book spurred me to dive in. So what exactly are Sandberg’s arguments? Here’s what I gathered: Women are not in the positions of power they deserve in the workplace. That’s partly because they often pull back from work once they start expanding their families and partly because, from the get-go, they don’t raise their hands, sit at the table or speak up enough. Of course, general expectations for how women should act — and the ways in which those expectations differ for men — also contribute to the absence of women leaders. However, what women can do now is “lean in” (while also keeping in mind that perfection is impossible). It seemed like reasonable advice to me, though it’s not without its caveats: Sandberg’s advice is applicable in only some workplace settings and for women who are lucky to have certain privileges. “Lean In”

also didn’t address how we as a society can change the things that individual women cannot control, though Sandberg briefly explains her reason for not addressing that in the first chapter of the book. After I finished the book, I read a few critiques and was shocked by the acid that dripped from some of them. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, who wrote “Pompom Girl for Feminism,” called Sandberg a wannabe “PowerPoint Pied Piper in Prada ankle boots reigniting the women’s revolution.” If Sandberg were a man, would Dowd have called out her penchant for nice shoes? I don’t think so, and that seems ironic. The very title of Dowd’s article is drawn from a quotation taken grossly out of context. Sandberg labels herself as a “pompom girl for feminism” in a tongue-in-cheek way after recounting an anecdote from her summer working as a page for her hometown congressman, William Lehman. Lehman had promised to introduce her to then-Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill. When Lehman finally made good on his promise, O’Neill reached over, patted Sandberg on the head and said to Lehman, “She’s pretty.” Then he asked Sandberg, “Are you a pom-pom girl?” Sandberg was crushed. My biggest takeaway from my experience reading “Lean In” this summer is this: Critics often veer into personal attacks to poke holes in the arguments of high-profile figures (often without reading their actual books). If you’re curious about the controversy that surrounds it, like I was, I’d recommend reading it — if nothing else, it is an engaging read.

This summer, I read a book that taught me about everything, ever. Okay, maybe not “everything, ever,” but certainly “a little bit of most major historical events of the world.” I’m referring to a book titled “A Little History of the World,” a tour-de-force by art historian Sir Ernst H. Gombrich. What sets this little gem — just 284 pages in my copy — apart from other history books that you’ve used as makeshift pillows is that Gombrich was writing for an audience of children. This is evident in his storybook tone, the beautiful artwork, as well as the short chapters designed for juvenile attention spans. However, the final product is neither patronizing nor elementary. Instead, rather like its title, “A Little History of the World” is hugely ambitious and endearing at the same time. But why should oh-so-educated college students who sleep four hours a night find time to read a children’s book about world history? Well, let’s be real. If you haven’t been in a conversation here in which you barely managed to pretend that you understood all the historical references, you will soon. Conveniently, Gombrich has compiled a table of contents that quite literally encompasses all of world history, from “Earth without life” to “Nirvana” to “Napoleon

in Corsica” to “Japan in 1850.” Even more impressively, he presents every period, however notorious, with both a sense of humor and a fairytale tenor. As a result, you come across sentences informing you that, “One day — but there’s no hurry — you may come to read the Bible. Nowhere else will you find so many stories about ancient times so vividly told.” The benefit of this being a children’s book is that Gombrich’s optimism, even in the gloomiest of narratives, never comes off as forced or naïve. His target audience also gives him a free pass for not going into every detail. Some long-lived conflicts, such as the American Civil War, are summarized in a manner of paragraphs. Rather than acting as a textbook, Gombrich renders a more panoramic view of collective human patterns, errors, and achievements. He simplifies but does not neglect. I should add a disclaimer: despite its broad range, Gombrich’s account is still a Eurocentric one — namely, his origin of continental Western Europe. After all, the book had been written in Austrian, for Austrian children. Nevertheless, it is not without frequent glimpses “across the seas.” There are, additionally, many moments that force you to broaden your views when you least expect it.

An example: “The book you have in your hand is made of paper, something we also owe to the Arabs, who themselves learnt how to make it from Chinese prisoners of war.” What really won me over in the end was just that, the ending — Gombrich’s sobering final chapter on “the small part of the history of the world which I have lived through myself.” Here, he arrives at the history of Hitler’s reign, from which he himself narrowly escaped. His account is written with care and with pain, and he reminds us — characteristically, through an anecdote about a Buddhist monk — that “one can be attached to one’s own country without needing to insist that the rest of the world’s inhabitants are worthless.” And he could not have said it better. To me, Gombrich embodies the study of history not as a static list of trivia, but a continuous process of discovery, of readjusting viewpoints and of building tolerance. So do yourself a favor: go buy this book. Maybe you won’t read it right away, but just keep it somewhere visible. And one day, the tempting title (and hopefully, the lingering memory of this article) may be enough for you to stop what you’re doing, pick up this little volume, and learn — even if just a little — about the world we live in.

Reviewed by

JENNIFER SHYUE Senior Writer

LIN KING :: ASSOCIATE STREET EDITOR


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.