March 3, 2017

Founded 1876 daily since 1892 online since 1998

Friday March 3, 2017 vol. CXLI no. 20

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } ON CAMPUS

BEYOND THE BUBBLE

Richard ’69 Crenshaw discusses neglect of intersectional identities champions green energy Nouran Ibrahim contributor

Graham Richard ’69, CEO of Advanced Energy Economy, “the business voice of advanced energy,” seeks to change the nature of laws regulating energy use to create stabler, cleaner energy sources in the United States.

AEE, a trade association, brings together a number of advanced energy businesses to inf luence state and federal governments to modify rules and regulations so that markets for advanced energy can be opened. Richard said that he believes that the failure of laws to change with the rapidly growing energy services field has slowed the use of sustainable energy.

The power of advanced energy production stems not only from its sustainability, but also from its resilience, he explained.

According to PRNewswire, advanced energy systems are now employing over 3 million Americans, a sizeable sector of the workforce.

“We take energy for granted,” Richard said, recalling the devastating Hurricane Sandy, which left thousands of individuals across the East Coast without electricity for days in October 2012. Richard said that he believes a realignment of

energy sourcing can be the answer to problems, such as those that arise after natural disasters, when only traditional energy sources are available.

Richard explained that in order for the power grid to operate more like “the internet, with lots of information f lowing all at one time at the same time,” institutions must be able to have their own power sources and operate on their own, remaining unaffected when disaster strikes.

It is clear that the creation of technology to produce and harness power is no longer the problem facing advanced energy expansion, Richard explained, but rather the growth of the market to allow for greater integration of advanced energy companies. He noted that the monopoly on the electric system by larger incumbent groups has been a major barrier to some energy companies’ growth today.

“When we have a choice, as we do today, of having more secure, cleaner, and more affordable energy opportunities, it is really important that we get society to notice,” Richard said.

He said it is this goal and vision that drives AEE’s efforts, which range from engaging with state legislaSee ENERGY page 2

COURTESY OF FLICKR

Crenshaw, a professor and activist, is well known in gender studies for devising the concept of intersectionality.

Claire Thornton contributor

All too often, the forces of justice in America fail to disrupt the status quo, explained Kimberlé Crenshaw in a lecture on Thursday. The thick controversy surrounding affirmative action in college admissions and hiring, the lack of equal coverage of black women shot and killed by police, and 20th century suffragist arguments based on white supremacy are just a few examples that Crenshaw provided of how when you scratch the surface, arguments on both sides of the political spectrum fail to acknowledge America’s racist and patriarchal legacy.

Crenshaw is a professor of law at UCLA and Columbia Law

ON CAMPUS

School and is known for her work in critical race theory, particularly for developing the term “intersectionality.”

In a talk at the University on March 2, she urged audience members to directly address the American legacy that has allowed for the election of Donald Trump. She admitted that for days following Nov. 8 — the day election results were released — she couldn’t sleep because she knew the act of waking would be similar to finding herself in an alternate reality.

“I have to be honest with you, I’m standing here in post-traumatic Trump syndrome,” Crenshaw said to an auditorium so packed that audience members also sat in the aisles and on the stage.

While studying anti-discrimination law in law school, Crenshaw realized that law did not account for the complex identities defined by both race and gender. She studied how black women in manufacturing faced discrimination because of their gender and how black women in clerical work faced discrimination because of their race.

Crenshaw said that she realized that the U.S. Constitution deals with race and gender as two separate aspects of a person’s identity, and that this means individuals with intersectional identities received less protection under the law.

Larry Miller, who gave an introductory speech at the event, chose to begin by directly addressing the privileges he has as a straight white male.

“I am playing the video game of life on the easiest difficulty level,” said Miller.

Miller’s sister Meredith Miller ’93 was killed during a car robbery in Virginia one year after graduating from the University. Miller’s family sponsors the Meredith Miller Lecture Series, which included Crenshaw’s talk, and serves to remember Miller’s work on matters of gender justice.

“It doesn’t mean life will always be easy for me, it doesn’t even mean it won’t ever be hard, but it won’t be hard because I am straight, or because I am white, or because I am male,” said Miller.

Crenshaw, too, argued that we must acknowledge painful truths in order to achieve equality. She said we must acknowledge that constitutional See CRENSHAW page 3

NEWS AND NOTES

Greitens discusses increases in Chinese security spending

Snider ’17 receives $246K in poker tournament win

contributor

associate news editor

In a public lecture on March 2, Dr. Sheena Chestnut Greitens, assistant professor of political science at the University of Missouri and First Lady of Missouri, spoke about increases in security spending in the People’s Republic of China from the late 20th century to present. Greitens is a leading scholar in comparative politics and international relations in East Asia.

In a small, densely packed room of professors, graduate students, and undergraduate students, Greitens challenged

listeners to look beyond Western media projections of Chinese security spending and truly analyze released statistics.

She emphasized the need to depart from media preconceptions about Chinese security spending, as well as the need to carefully analyze what few numerical sources the Chinese government releases to the international community.

“The lecture that I am presenting today is focused on China,” Greitens explained, “but is also focused on trying to put some numbers that we often hear from China that we often hear in the media and the press and in the

IMAGE BY SAMUEL OH

Greitens spoke Thursday on media preconceptions regarding China.

policy world in the cross national perspective and see what this means for China.”

Greitens began by rebutting the media-created gloom that appears to surround the rise of China’s security spending.

“The main interpretation is that these spending increases are evidence of strong and growing coercive capacity and repressiveness on the part of the Chinese party in the post-Tiananmen era,” Greitens said.

Greitens, however, argued that such evidence does not take into account China’s internal and external challenges, as well as the way that money is divided into Chinese coercive apparatus.

“To make quantifiable inferences about coercive capacity, what can you look at?” Greitens asked. “And I agree that we must look at what a country spends in an appropriate degree of context: what that money gets spent on, and what that money is spent against, or what is the magnitude of the challenge that money has to address and how is that shifting in the period we are talking about in changes in spending.”

Furthermore, Greitens prompted her audience to question if China is really different in spending levels, compared to other developed countries.

“You immediately run into the question, ‘Well, China is really different and it’s got a lot of See GREITENS page 2

By Abhiram Karuppur Bradley Snider ’17, who formerly served as the president of the Princeton Poker Club, received $246,000 in prize money for winning the Freeze-Out event at the Seminole Hard Rock Poker Open in August 2016. He plans to attend the World Series of Poker tournament in Las Vegas, Nev. this summer.

Snider defeated 529 other players at the Seminole Hard Rock Poker Open to win the Freeze-Out event, in which he had to place an initial bet of $2,650 in order to participate.

Snider explained that his interest in poker comes from watching his dad play casual games, and that he really became fascinated with the game once the streaming service Twitch started to show online poker games.

“I was also really fascinated by the idea that in poker it was possible to make money in the long run by playing well,” he added. “I also like that underlying the game there is a deep mathematical structure.”

In fact, Snider pointed to two University classes which covered content that directly related to elements of poker strategy. According to Snider, ORF 309 and MAT 378,

In Opinion

Today on Campus

The Board argues that the University should not collectively punish athletics teams, while Luke Gamble blasts a recent Yale column about athletics.

4:30-6 p.m.: Seeking Refuge: Faith-Based Approaches to Forced Migration. Opening panel “Who is a Refugee and Therefore Who Am I?” in McCosh 50

PAGE 4

which cover probability and game theory respectively, form some of the core fundamentals behind poker.

Because poker has a foundation in math and probability, Snider noted that students pursuing STEM majors tend to be the most adept poker players. However, he added that non-STEM majors can also excel at poker if they possess certain skills.

“I think that those who enjoy strategy games and have good problem-solving skills could become great poker players,” he said.

During the fall semester break of 2016, Snider attended the PokerStars Tournament in Atlantic City, N.J., which featured 40 tournaments over the course of that week.

He won some cash during the side events, and he also participated in a PokerStars Tournament in the Bahamas in January. Snider also plans to attend the World Series of Poker Tournament, which is a six-week long tournament.

With regard to the prize money that Snider has won over the years, he explained that he plans to save a portion of it and also use some of it to place bets in future poker tournaments.

WEATHER

Samuel Oh

HIGH

39˚

LOW

17˚

Sunny with clouds. chance of rain:

5 percent

The Daily Princetonian

page 2

Friday March 3, 2017

Crenshaw: I’m standing here in postRichard: We must traumatic Trump syndrome inform society of CRENSHAW wider energy options Continued from page 1

ENERGY

Continued from page 1

.............

tors to enlarge the advanced energy market to informing the public utility commissions with key regulatory issues that should be addressed when regulating electric and natural gas utilities.

The growing popularity of energy clubs across college campuses is telling of the growing importance of environmentalism to American students, he said. Sustainable Software Initiative, Sustainable Engineering and Development Scholars, and the Princeton University Energy Association are student groups that address sustainable energy questions at the University.

According to Richard, Lisa Perez Jackson *86, who joined recently, and Dan’l Lewin ’76 serve on AEE’s board of directors.

Richard noted that not all those who can and should make an impact have to focus on environmentalism itself; he encouraged individuals to search for other ways to get involved. Richard suggested students interested in business to start companies for new energy producers or find new ways to to finance advanced energy. He said those interested in politics can work for state regulatory agencies that govern utilities.

Richard explained that the possibilities are endless when it comes to advanced energy, and that many people underestimate just how much it has contributed to economic growth and job creation.

.............

To illustrate the kind of impact advanced energy can have and the vastness of opportunities it opens, Richard mentioned the possibility of transforming cars into power sources. He said Teslas are quickly becoming zero-emission vehicles, running on electric batteries. If there were a way to connect all these electric vehicles to a larger power grid, they could become a new source of cleaner energy, as opposed to a huge coal power plant, he said. Not only is this highly energyefficient, but it is revolutionary in that it “completely changes the way in which we think about electricity,” according to Richard.

Tesla is a member organization of AEE. According to AEE’s website, other members include Siemens, Intel, Facebook, Walmart, Comcast, and Amazon.

Leadership council members include such companies as Microsoft, Oracle, and Apple.

The regulation of energy is highly complex, but that does not mean individuals like Richard and organizations like AAE are going to stop pushing to bring to life their vision of a prosperous economy run on affordable clean energy. As Richard said, it is by joining and creating more coalitions, like AAE, between inf luential business leaders today that we can begin to think about the larger impact technology can have on environmentalism.

language centered around the idea of the individual prevents the administration of justice to people who have been systemically discriminated against because of their membership to a particular group.

“Critical race theory talks about the power that is instantiated in these institutions,” Crenshaw explained. “Post-racialism is about eliminating biases by better navigating these institutions.”

Basing the majority of her points on American legal history, Crenshaw argued that the various motivations behind political movements in this country have led to many of the unique dilemmas witnessed in the 21st century.

As an example, Crenshaw noted, “White supremacy was the baseline from which Anthony and Stanton framed the unique insult of being denied the right to vote.”

“White women under this frame were more qualified to vote than black men, and more vulnerable to black men because they were denied the The Daily Princetonian is published daily except Saturday and Sunday from September through May and three times a week during January and May by The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., 48 University Place, Princeton, N.J. 08540. Mailing address: P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542.

Subscription rates: Mailed in the United States $175.00 per year, $90.00 per semester. Office hours: Sunday through Friday, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Telephones: Business: 609-375-8553; News and Editorial: 609-258-3632. For tips, email news@dailyprincetonian.com. Reproduction of any material in this newspaper without expressed permission of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Copyright 2014, The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Daily Princetonian, P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542.

right to vote,” she explained.

“These arguments have been buried in our incorporation of women’s suffrage movements in the pantheon of social justice victories, but it remains a pattern of argumentation that reappears in contemporary politics.”

Crenshaw went on to expose these arguments as they have presented themselves in the work of individuals many readers would consider liberal.

For example, Crenshaw mentioned that while Barack Obama’s creation of the My Brother’s Keeper initiative has provided black men and boys in the United States with $2 billion in government support, similar groups for black women and girls have only pulled together $118 million.

Crenshaw said My Brother’s Keeper is “based on the idea that we want to create strong healthy families, and despite all of the challenges to traditional families that have come up in the wake of marriage equality and all of the new gender thinking that’s going on, when we’re talking about racial disparities, we’re back like we’re in ‘Ozzie and Harriet,’” said Crenshaw, receiving laughter from

the audience. “This is all about how we need to have trickledown patriarchy,” she said.

Crenshaw asked everyone in the audience to raise their hands while she called out names. She told people to lower their hands when they heard a name they did not recognize.

Everyone’s hands remained in the air as Crenshaw announced the names of four black men who have been shot and killed by the police in recent years.

Then Crenshaw said a woman’s name.

The motion of hands returning to laps was audible throughout the auditorium.

Crenshaw continued to say name after name, all of them women, as hands remained motionlessly in laps.

Crenshaw’s talk was held in McCormick 101 at 4:30 p.m. on March 2. The event was sponsored by the Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies and was co-sponsored by the Women*s Center, the Carl A. Fields Center for Equality and Cultural Understanding, and Campus Conversations on Identity.

Greitens: Media has wrongfully portrayed Chinese spending GREITENS Continued from page 1

.............

relatively unique challenges.’”

Greitens noted. “But in comparison with similar countries such as the U.S. and Russia, China spends less than both.”

Greitens asserted that the changing nature of Chinese society, from new governmental institutions to the rise in crime, has forced the Chinese government to focus on internal security spending.

“A lot of the institutions with migrations and other changes that were some of the Maoist link between state and public have really weakened,” she explained.

“And it is not surprising to me that the formal governmental institutions of coercion would have to increase their resources to counter the institutions Mao’s China had used, which were compulsory and didn’t require spending money.”

Greitens continued to challenge listeners by encouraging them to imagine the challenges faced by Chinese domestic security officials.

“The challenges are what China [is] spending against and what China is trying to keep up with its coercive apparatus in the last twenty years. And the coercive apparatus is politically powerful but it does not necessarily give it more ability,” Greitens said. “Their power in the party position has risen, their power in the party system has risen, but not necessarily their ability to keep control of Chinese society.”

Greitens said that if she was a Chinese official, she would be worried.

“I would say, ‘I’m not sure we are keeping up. We are spending money, but we are not keeping up,’” she explained. “The issue is determining how these resourc-

es are being used, translating into the ability to control people and territory. So, it would make sense that China is expanding its control over social control over the state party and Chinese society, while keeping quiet about the numbers.”

Greitens finished by emphasizing the importance of measures of coercive capacity in budget and monetary numbers released by nations worldwide.

She stressed the need for a crossnational effort to coordinate such informational releases.

“Coercive capacity is pretty essential to our ideas of when autocratic regimes rise and fall; when is there a coup?” Greitens said. “When does the military choose to side with the protestors or the autocrat? These fall under the nebulous term ‘coercive capacity.’ There are some organizational indicators as well as budget indicators، such as the International Institute for Strategic Studies، on a cross-national scale if we actually want to get a handle on domestic security and stability in both authoritarian and democratic countries.”

Greitens’ lecture was met with substantial consideration and approval.

Speaking about the lecture, Rory Truex, assistant professor of politics and public affairs, said, “[The lecture] overturns a standard conception of China — all of this budget increase is really an increase in coercive capacity and a response to normal crime and uncertainty. It challenges the existing conceptions that we see in the media with very good data and a very compelling presentation.”

The lecture was held in Wallace Hall at 4:30 p.m. and was hosted by the Center of International Studies at the Wilson School.

this space.

FOR SALE price on request.

For more information, contact ‘Prince’ business.

Call (609)258-8110 or Email business@dailyprincetonian.com

The Daily Princetonian

Friday March 3, 2017

page 3

What do you care about?

What will you do?

JOIN US! MARCH 6 DAY OF ACTION FRIST CAMPUS CENTER

9 a.m.–9 p.m.

dayofaction.princeton.edu

of

A

Opinion

Friday march 3. 2017

page 4

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

EDITORIAL

I

Affirming free speech and encouraging team leadership

n December 2016, the Princeton men’s swimming and diving team made national news after University officials suspended the team’s season following reports of “several materials” deemed “vulgar and offensive, as well as misogynistic and racist in nature.” This announcement came shortly after Harvard suspended its men’s soccer team over a similar issue. The Board does not condone in any way the actions of either team, yet their suspensions bring up important issues of collective punishment and private speech, especially as they pertain to athletes. Although it is difficult to comment on the individual cases given the lack of available information, the Board believes it is important to articulate general principles about how the administration and teams should act in such cases.

First, the University should have been more transparent about its handling of this incident and its general policies. University statements on the team’s suspension were vague and did not articulate a full policy on the matter. As punishments such as these set precedents for how future issues will be dealt with, the University should increase transparency about its handling of this specific case.

Within the limits of confidentiality protections, the administration should outline to other sports teams, both varsity and club, exactly what lines were crossed by the men’s swimming and diving team and provide a clear policy on the matter, as this precedent affects all teams.

While the University must provide specific guidelines for its actions in cases such as these, athletic teams need to step up to combat offensive behavior within teams and their communications. Coaches and team members, especially upperclassmen and team leaders, must be accountable for their team’s locker room cultures and set good examples by their own conduct. If derogatory or offensive comments begin to be made frequently, whether in the form of personal conversations, emails sent on a University listserv, or a private group chat, team leaders must be aware and move promptly to address the issue before it becomes part of the pervasive team culture.

Limiting offensive comments and materials is much more easily done preemptively, so teams should be proactive in confronting these issues and seek to cultivate an internal culture of responsibility and accountability.

However, this positive culture of self-accountability will be harder to achieve if the University decides to institute a policy of collective punishment in response to offensive remarks made by individual team members, as it did in suspending the entire men’s swimming and diving team. Collective punishment is morally dubious as a practice because it punishes the innocent along with the guilty. And although team members who did not send offensive materials may have had access to them and did not say anything, the

University must be sensitive to the fact that those team members could be silenced by team power dynamics or fear of retribution, a fear that would only be exacerbated by a policy of collective punishment. If the University expects teams to be responsible and proactively address issues of team culture, it should refrain from making collective punishment its default policy in these cases.

Finally, while it is essential that team leaders be more active in preventing the incidence of derogatory or offensive exchanges, when this fails, we do not believe the University should take action based solely on such comments made in private contexts. Given the broad and vague sweep many of the University’s current policies take, it is impossible for students to know what conduct would be deemed punishable or not. Moreover, as the University notes in its IT Acceptable Use Policy, “students, for whom the University effectively is a residence during the academic year, normally are afforded a high degree of privacy.” The University must meet its own standard and afford students, including student athletes, the broadest latitude in their speech and free expression in private communications. Comments made in group texts, GroupMe chats, or email exchanges (including those with @princeton.edu) should not be the basis for disciplinary action unless the conduct therein meets the legal definition of a crime.

Just as the University should not punish offensive comments made in a private conversation between athletes of a certain team walking along Elm Drive, so too they should not punish athletes or any other students conversing through private electronic channels. This is not to say that harassment should go unpunished, but any private speech that does not meet the legal definition of harassment should not be punished.

The Board rejects a brave new world in which a student offended by an overheard or electronic conversation can make a report that results in a Title IX administrator suspending an entire sports team.

We believe that Princeton students, as adults, have the ability to resolve differences that do not arise to the level of a crime between themselves.

Language policing by administrative referees undermines the sanctity of private relationships that all students cherish.

DISSENT We believe the University has a clear and compelling interest in the regulation of misogynistic, racist, and otherwise derogatory speech exchanged between members of the campus community; accordingly, we respectfully dissent.

First, collective punishment is a powerful tool to demonstrate to all University athletic teams and student organizations that the culture cultivated by “locker room talk” is

entirely unacceptable. Narrowly tailored, individual punishment for perpetrators implicitly endorses the notion that it is okay to be a bystander; consequently, bystanders stand watch as harmful speech norms are perpetuated in private circles, knowing they are shielded from punishment if such speech is revealed to University administrators.

When the punishment for any vile behavior by any member of a student organization is suspension of that organization’s activities, there are internal incentives for bystanders to identify and discourage harmful behavior.

Second, and far more troubling, is the majority’s free speech and privacy advocacy. By the majority’s metric, any “private speech” at the University may only be regulated if it falls under the legal definition of harassment. On principle, we believe the University community is distinct from the broader American political and social community; accordingly, free speech standards for our community are necessarily different.

In this dissent, we do not abandon our advocacy for the broadest latitudes of speech permissibility in academic settings. At the core of any academic community is the mission to seek truth. We do, however, believe that non-academic exchanges through modes of communication such as @princeton.edu listservs and GroupMe forums should be held to a high standard of scrutiny, such as the one established in Section 1.2.1 of Rights, Rules, Responsibilities.

The majority’s attempt to distinguish a private conversation between two students on Elm Drive from public and directed speech falls f lat in the context of the University community. What we say is often heard by individuals we do not realize are listening. Further, what we say is entrenched in norms of acceptability. Locker room talk, if not heard by women and sexual minorities, is still wildly harmful because it perpetuates a culture in which perpetrators of locker room talk believe such speech and the opinions underpinning it are accepted and acceptable. The claim that restrictions on such speech will chill political speech on campus is preposterous, and the majority should consider the interaction between speech and the time, space, and manner in which it is spoken.

Signed by, Carolyn Liziewski ’18, Connor Pfeiffer ’18, Ashley Reed ’18, Dee-Dee Huang ’20, William Pugh ’20, and Cydney Kim ’17 Megan Armstrong ‘19 abstained from the writing of this editorial.

The Editorial Board is an independent body and decides its opinions separately from the regular staff and editors of The Daily Princetonian. The Board answers only to its Co-Chairs, the Opinion Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief. It can be reached at editorialboard@dailyprincetonian.com.

vol. cxli

Sarah Sakha ’18

editor-in-chief

Matthew McKinlay ’18 business manager

BOARD OF TRUSTEES president Richard W. Thaler, Jr. ’73 vice presidents John G. Horan ’74 Thomas E. Weber ’89 secretary Betsy L. Minkin ’77 treasurer Michael E. Seger ’71 Craig Bloom ’88 Gregory L. Diskant ’70 William R. Elfers ’71 Stephen Fuzesi ’00 Zachary A. Goldfarb ’05 Joshua Katz Kathleen Kiely ’77 Rick Klein ’98 James T. MacGregor ’66 Alexia Quadrani Jerry Raymond ’73 Randall Rothenberg ’78 Annalyn Swan ’73 Douglas J. Widmann ’90

141ST MANAGING BOARD managing editors Megan Laubach ’18 Grace Rehaut ’18 Christina Vosbikian ’18 Head news editor Marcia Brown ’19 news editors Abhiram Karuppur ’19 opinion editor Newby Parton ’18 sports editor David Xin ’19 street editor Jianing Zhao ’20 photography editor Rachel Spady ’18 web editor David Liu ’18 chief copy editors Isabel Hsu ’19 Samuel Garfinkle ’19 design editor Abigail Kostolansky ’20 Rachel Brill ’19 associate opinion editors Samuel Parsons ’19 Nicholas Wu ’18 associate sports editors Miranda Hasty ’19 Claire Coughlin ’19 associate street editor Andie Ayala ’19 Catherine Wang ’19 associate chief copy editors Caroline Lippman ’19 Omkar Shende ’18 editorial board co-chairs Ashley Reed ’18 Connor Pfeiffer ’18 cartoons editor Tashi Treadway ’19

NIGHT STAFF 3.2.17 copy Jordan Antebi ’19 Minh Hoang ’19 Douglas Corzine ’20

Journalists report, opinion writers spout.

But someone’s got to lay it all out!

Join the ‘Prince’ design team!

Email join@dailyprincetonian.com

The Daily Princetonian

Friday March 3, 2017

page 5

Athletes put to the test Luke Gamble

senior columnist

A

s I see it, athletics have everything to do with the mission of a university like Princeton.

In his recent column for the Yale Daily News, “Admission and Athletics,” Cole Aronson argued that Yale should stop reserving admission spots for athletes because athletics have “nothing to do with the mission of a college as I see it.”

However, far from taking away from the intellectual rigor or breadth of the Princeton experience, athletes serve the academic mission of the University by providing a wealth of diverse and unique perspectives which would not be expressed by those whose involvement in sport is purely recreational.

Aronson dismisses the notion that excellence in athletics shouldn’t be considered in a “holistic” application process because “holistic” admissions only take into consideration “the purpose of a college… and sports fails the test.” But of course, he conveniently avoids stating just what the purpose of a college is, and he also fails to define Yale’s mission.

He is content to simply assert that athletics have nothing to do with that mission.

Aronson even complains that Yale “unofficially” reserves spots for athletes, noting that there are “presumably” academic requirements for those recruits. The claims reveal a gross misunderstanding about how the athletic recruiting process works in the Ivy League.

I’m not here just to blow hot air back at Aronson with a contrarian opinion.

I do enough huffing and puffing during morning workouts and while sprinting to class. But I would like to dispel a few of the inaccuracies in Aronson’s depiction of Ivy League athletics.

What Aronson doesn’t

realize is that there is a highly complex and sophisticated system in place to ensure the selection of the most qualified and competitive athletes who can make the most of an Ivy League education. Athletics is integral to the lives of a large portion of our community, all of whom believe that athletics is, in fact, a central component to the educational mission that the world’s most prestigious schools are pursuing.

The Ivy League tracks and scrutinizes the academic credentials of every recruited athlete who enters the doors of its eight member institutions — and it has done so for more than 30 years with more than 45,000 student-athletes. The Ivy League came up with a measurement called the Academic Index, which provides a standardized measuring tool for all applicants, summarizing high school grade-point averages and scores on standardized tests such as the SAT and placing them on a 240 scale. Most people don’t realize that the index number of every admitted recruit is shared among all eight members of the Ivy League to guarantee that no underqualified recruit has been admitted to a rival institution, and to allow member universities to compare class-wide index averages for athletes against corresponding averages for the overall student body.

The average AI for athletes at Princeton is actually much closer to that of non-athletes than most people think.

In 2016, the average AI for non-athletic regular people at Princeton was 220, whereas each class of athletic teams must have a score of at least 215. Contrary to Cole’s confidence about his own superiority, the athletes by whom he is so ashamed to be surrounded were all stellar high school

students themselves.

The Princeton University Athletics Department explains its educational role powerfully.

The core philosophy of the athletic department centers on athletics as an extension of the overall educational mission of the institution. These philosophies are at the heart of the department’s official motto: “Education Through Athletics.” As the department says on its website, “the University’s position has long been that competitive athletics programs contribute significantly to the teaching and development of students, and all University athletics programs are designed to be in harmony with the essential educational objectives of the institution.”

Education and athletics are not mutually exclusive.

I can’t speak for Yale, but I know that, at Princeton, athletics serve as a vital part of our mission to grow and educate the leaders of tomorrow.

Aronson misunderstands how central athletics are to the mission and community of Princeton and other elite academic institutions.

They are not just some banal happening that students pursue to pass time or to have something to talk about at dinner.

Rather, the pursuit of athletic excellence has long been, and continues to be, an integral process in the education and growth of some of the nation’s finest individuals and scholars. For example, Bill Bradley was a Rhodes Scholar, one of Princeton’s best basketball players ever, and also a U.S. senator.

Aronson criticizes athletes for not pulling their weight intellectually on campus. It is ironic, then, that Cole seems to have done absolutely no research, diligence, or homework before alienating himself from a

Burst the Bubble!

Tashi Treadway ’19 ............................................

fifth of his student body by spewing a groundless and damning opinion.

That Aronson did not do his homework is laughable because, according to him, that’s the only worthwhile thing that any of us are doing.

Athletes provide expansive diversities of viewpoints for the campus community. If it weren’t for the recruiting process, the University would miss out on bringing various interests and backgrounds to the student body.

Harvard didn’t accept Yo-Yo Ma because of his stellar high school grades, but rather because of so much else that he brought to the university. The Department of Athletics doesn’t recruit bodies just to win games, just like the Office of Admission doesn’t just recruit minds to solve the same problem sets. Both the athletic recruiting process, and admissions overall, are holistic — they always have been. To place strict intellectualism on such a pedestal has never been the mission of the University.

Aronson argues that “Einstein deserves everyone’s admiration more than Tom Brady does.” That is probably the case, but it was Einstein who wanted us not to think quite so much or so narrow-mindedly, about strictly academic and intellectual endeavors.

“We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality,” Einstein said. I hope the same does not become true of you, Aronson.

I have the urge to say Princeton 1, Yale 0. Then again, I guess we don’t keep score in academics.

Sorry, old athlete habit. Go Tigers!

Luke Gamble is an English major from Eagle, Idaho. He can be reached at ljgamble@ princeton.edu.

Sports

Friday March 3, 2017

page 6

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } MEN’S AND WOMEN’S TRACK & FIELD

Men’s and women’s track & field win big at Heps Viraj Deokar staff writer

COURTESY OF GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM

Men and women’s track and field finished the indoor season off with a bang, the men claiming their 20th Ivy League title and the women earning fourth-place honors.regionals and advancing to nationals.

The men’s and women’s track and field teams concluded their respective seasons at the Indoor Track and Field Heptagonal Championships, held at the Armory Track in New York City on Feb. 25 and 26. To say that the meet was exciting would be an understatement.

Many Princeton alumni came to cheer on the teams, alongside families and friends of the competitors. With the stands packed and noise levels high throughout the weekend, the support for the Orange and Black was otherworldly. The emotion displayed this past weekend truly represented the beauty of track and field — it’s a sport where results come only from hard work and dedication, and the feeling of fighting until the finish and battling for teammates on the championship stage is one that few sports have.

This year, the Princeton men’s track and field team captured the Indoor Heptagonal title for a third consecutive year. This win was the 20th indoor title overall for the men’s program.

The Tigers performed like they had all season and proved yet again why Princeton is the most feared team in the Ivy League.

Cornell’s boos proved to be futile as chants of “Princeton!” filled the stadium and the Tigers steamrolled the competition.

After Saturday’s competition, Princeton was tied with Cornell at 28 points. However, with a tremendous effort on Sunday, the Tigers easily pulled

away with 119 points, compared to Cornell’s 73. The Tigers ultimately finished with 147 points, a full 46 points ahead of secondplace Cornell.

Out of the 32 Princetonmen who competed, 28 of them scored in the meet by placing top six in their respective events.

Eight Tigers earned first team All-Ivy honors with their first-place finishes: junior Carrington Akosa (60m), senior Xavier Bledsoe (high jump), junior Mitchel Charles (shot put), junior August Kiles (pole vault), senior Jabari Johnson (4x400m relay), freshman Connor Matthews (4x400m relay), junior Josh Freeman (4x400m relay), and senior Ray Mennin (4x400m relay).

The Tigers earned eleven second team All-Ivy honors with runner-up finishes in their events: sophomore Stefan Amokwandoh (triple jump), senior Christopher Cook (shot put), sophomore Adam Kelly (weight throw), freshman Conor Lundy (5000m), sophomore Charlie Volker (60m, 200m), junior Noah Kauppila (1000m, 4x800m relay), sophomore Franklin Aririguzoh (4x800m relay), junior Kenan Farmer (4x800m relay), and junior Josh Ingalls (4x800m relay).

For his incredible work this season as the men’s team head coach, Fred Samara was named the 2017 Ivy League Indoor Track and Field Coach of the Year. The award was started in 2015, and Samara has won it every year. Samara has now won 39 Ivy League Championships in his storied coaching career.

This year marks Samara’s 35th year as coach.

The Princeton women’s track and field team tied for a No. 4 finish at the meet. The Tigers had been competing hard all season, and they capped their season off well. A majority of the team scored for Princeton.

Princeton was in the lead after Saturday’s events with 31 points due to the strong field performances. However, Harvard and Penn had a strong showing Sunday and pulled ahead. However, the Tigers had a terrific team showing in the 4x800m relay, winning convincingly, and thanks to many great individual performances, Princeton ultimately finished with 81 points.

Six Tigers received first team All-Ivy honors for wins in their respective events: senior Allison Harris (pole vault), senior Julia Ratcliffe (weight throw), sophomore Jackie Berardo (4x800m relay), senior Zoe Sims (4x800m relay), sophomore Anna Jurew (4x800m relay), and senior Katie Hanss (4x800m relay). Junior Maia Craver earned second team All-Ivy honors for her runner-up finish in the in the pentathlon.

While the season is over for the two teams, two Tigers qualified for the NCAA Indoor Track and Field Championships, which will be held on Mar. 10 and 11 at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas. Sophomore Adam Kelly will compete in the weight throw, in which he ranks No. 7 nationally; senior captain Allie Harris will compete in the pole vault, in which she ranks No. 11 nationally.

MEN’S WRESTLING

Men’s wrestling poised for upcoming EIWA and NCAA championships Michael Gao staff writer

It hasn’t always been smooth sailing for the Princeton wrestling team. Competing in an Ivy League dominated for decades

by Cornell, as well as competing within the fiercely competitive EIWA, the Tigers have often struggled to find their place in a sport traditionally dominated by large, storied Midwestern programs. Head coach Chris Ayres, however, has turned Princeton from an insignificant contender in college wrestling to a consistent placer in the NCAA national championships, one of the most dangerous squads in the EIWA. The Tigers found themselves facing some of the nation’s elite teams this season: Virginia Tech, Nebraska, EIWA rival Lehigh, and most notably, in-state rival Rutgers, a team that Princeton took on in the first-ever “Battle at the Birthplace,” one of the largest sporting events in New Jersey history. Though Princeton lost most of their matchups against higherranked teams this season, their grit, determination, and talent on the mat cannot be questioned.

Later in the season, the Orange and Black smashed through the rest of the Ivy League, demolishing Penn, Harvard, Columbia, and Brown by margins of over 20 points per meet before narrowly falling to Cornell and its bevy of top-ten wrestlers in a dogged 2112 effort. A decisive 28-9 win over Franklin and Marshall to close out the regular season allowed the Tigers to secure their fourth season in a row with over a .500 in

Tweet of the Day

winning percentage.

Now sitting on the edge of the postseason, this Princeton squad may be prepared to make an impact that no Tigers wrestling team ever has. Seven Princeton wrestlers are ranked nationally in the final RPI, and five are in the top 20. They’re spearheaded by senior captains Jordan Laster and all-American Brett Harner, both veterans of last year’s NCAA tournament, and outstanding freshman star Matthew Kolodzik, ranked No. 8 in the nation at 141 pounds.

Accordingly, this year’s EIWA championships holds special significance for an ambitious Princeton team. The EIWA is poised to send 43 wrestlers on to the national NCAA wrestling championships. Last year, a fifth-place Princeton was able to send four wrestlers, all of whom are now looking for a second chance to return to the national stage: Harner, Laster, senior Ray O’Donnell, and junior Jonathan Schleifer, all currently ranked nationally.

This year, the Tigers, with a very realistic chance of bettering their EIWA standings from last year, hope to send an even larger contingent out onto the mat. It will be far from an easy task. Stepping into the ring at Lewisburg, the Tigers will relive challenging matchups with Drexel, Lehigh, and Cornell, all of whom felled Princeton earlier in the season.

But if there’s anything this group of wrestlers has shown us, it’s that strength of will and determination can conquer even the greatest odds.

“✓ Finalist for Rookie of the Year ✓ Finalist for Goalie of the Year ✓ Finalist for Player of the Year #TrifectaComplete #Sneatby” Princeton WHockey (@ PWIH), Women’s Ice Hockey

COURTESY OF GOPRINCETONTIGERS.COM

The men’s wrestling team is prepping for an exciting finish to their 2016-17 season, starting with the EIWA Championships this week in Lewisburg, Pa., regionals and advancing to nationals.

Stat of the Day

6 goals

Freshman forward Carly Bullock of women’s ice hockey earns ECAC Rookie of the Month honor, leading the rookies in the league with six goals.

Follow us Check us out on Twitter @princesports for live news and reports, and on Instagram @princetoniansports for photos!