Pg. 2
Equality for everyone!
Mooney sends CVHS over the moon
Olympian likes Prop. 8 ruling
VOLUME 55, ISSUE 7
Prop. 8 marriage ban thrown out once again
Pg. 4
Maestra Mooney es muy buena
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2012
Trojans devoured by O’Dowd Dragons
PROP 8: Page 11
Tim Pak / Photo Editor
Senior Dawson Johnson prevents the Bishop O’Dowd player from stealing the ball during the boys varsity basketball game on Feb. 8. See Page 8 for story.
aided by Cash for College Staff Writer
Every year, CVHS is sponsored by the state of California to hold an annual workshop, Cash for College, which took place on Jan. 31. The entire senior class and their families were welcomed, and a presentation was given to the audience about the general college institution, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), and scholarships. “I think Cash for College is a great service for people to learn about FAFSA,” said Career Center director Melanie Small. Around 360 students and parents arrived and gathered around the CVHS cafeteria. Students were required to sign in, which automatically gave them an opportunity to win a $1000 scholarship. Essays and applica-
Students’ cars could be towed during construction Online Editor
Students and parents By Joyce Liang
WWW.CVHSOLYMPIAN.COM
By Michael Castillo
Editor-in-Chief
tions were not required for the scholarship. The workshop was divided into two parts: it began with a short presentation about general college information, then students/parents were led to the computer lab to submit the FAFSA online at http://www. fafsa.gov. Murad Dibbini, the dean of Holy Names College, was the guest speaker who gave the short presentation during the workshop alongside CVHS counselor Natalie Mathrole. Small believes that it is important for students to apply for financial student aid. To those who are not aware of FAFSA, it is a free application for students to apply for financial aid so they can potentially be funded for college.
CASH: Page 10
Pg. 9
Four Trojans qualify for state
CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546
By Anna Balassone CVHS senior Austin Bruckner stood outside San Francisco’s Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday, Feb. 7, holding a pro-gay rights sign and anxiously awaiting the results of the Proposition 8 hearing that was going on inside. The decision was supposed to be made at 10 a.m. but, as the results would not be announced publicly, Bruckner’s fellow protesters were refreshing their laptops and smartphones in eager anticipation of the decision’s arrival on the Internet. “We were doing a chant when this lady on her laptop randomly said ‘It’s unconstitutional,’” explained Bruckner. “When we realized that the woman was reading the decision that had been made, we all started crying and hugging each other.” The outburst of emotion described by Bruckner was a response to the momentous decision made that morning by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Proposition 8, California’s ban on gay marriage, is unconstitutional because it violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees
Who says girls can’t wrestle?
All parking for CVHS students will be eliminated as of March 1 due to the construction of 3,000 solar panels over the staff, senior and junior parking lots. The school intends to tow the cars of students parked on campus without warning. “We will tow on first offense,” said Assistant Principal Matt Steinecke, who is in charge of the logistics of the project. “There is not enough time or space to mess around with warnings.” Towing expenses will likely run around $200 per vehicle, school officials estimate. While student parking will be eliminated, $7 refunds will be available for all who bought $20 parking permits. “If they get a refund though, we will not reissue a permit should the lots reopen,” explained Steinecke. The panels will provide for 75 percent of the school’s energy needs, and are expected to save the district $100,000 annually. They will last for 30 years. The $6.6 million project was partially funded by a $1.4 million PG&E grant. The district received the grant on two conditions: the first being that construction would start before the summer of 2012, and the second being that the district would re-
ceive no solar energy kickbacks from the company. Solar panel users who run up an energy surplus often have the option to sell their extra energy back to the power company. Under the conditions of the grant, CVHS will not have this option. “PG&E usually buys energy from its clients who use solar panels,” said Steinecke. “Not so for us; in our case, it is purely a donation.” The effects of the construction will be felt most directly by seniors, who hold most of the school’s parking permits. Nonetheless, students of all grade levels are nervous about the congestion that is sure to come. “I don’t like the idea [of eliminating student parking], and I think it’s unfair,” said junior Janice Lu. In the event that the panels are not fully installed by the end of the school year, the school will stop all construction for graduation week to reduce gridlock. Construction will be resumed after graduation. Despite the inconvenience of installation, the benefits of transitioning to solar power cannot be ignored. . “It’s like buying a gym membership,” Steinecke said. “You buy it up front, and then get to use it for an extended amount of time.”
Proposed parcel tax plan rejected By Melody Moteabbed Staff Writer
The school board rejected a proposed parcel tax – a tax on real estate that Castro Valley property owners would be required to pay – that possibly could have helped out the financial crises of the Castro Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). According to Superintendent Jim Negri, the school board received a recommendation to not proceed with the parcel tax proposal due to weak support. This dismayed the board, which could have used the money for educational benefits such as more qualified teachers, an increase in modern technology, and smaller class sizes. The recommendation was determined from a survey by the Center of Community Opinion, which suggested the proposal
be delayed. The factors that led to the decision included the fact that there was uncertainty on how the parcel taxes may be used, the support from K-12 parents was not enough to pass a two-thirds majority vote, and the only costs voters would likely support was at an annual cost of $50 or less per property owner. “In theory, (a parcel tax) is good for schools, parents, and the districts,” said John Green, a CVHS teacher and president of the Castro Valley Teachers Association. “What parents don’t notice is how important it is. This is urgent and very important for cherished school activities students enjoy. Without these funds, there will be further cuts.” While Green pointed out that these extra dollars could directly help schools by keeping athletics and other programs available, he did note that there are also
some cons. “It’s a total of $200,000 more to have the proposal passed on the ballot. People are already having trouble with money as it is. If it doesn’t pass, money will be wasted on the amounts of printed paper ballots which had been used for it.” Appealing to personal income issues, he asserted that “the parcel tax is regressive and is a flat tax, which means that people living in big mansions will pay the same taxes as those lowerincome people struggling. It’s essentially unfair. And the fact that communities have to pay, as opposed to the state, will probably drive people away from liking it.” It is plausible that the parcel tax issue will be debated about in the future and, in the hopes of many, approved.