Corsair The Santa Monica College
Volume C, Issue 6
Informing Since 1929
www.thecorsaironline.com
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Legal alternatives to marijuana raise questions
Health concerns surround legal substitutes to drug at heart of Prop. 19 By Miles Arnold Staff Writer On Nov. 2, California voters will head to the polls to cast their votes on a number of propositions, as well as a new governor. Among the propositions on the ballot is the controversial Prop 19 that, with a “yes” vote, will legalize marijuana under California law and permit local governments to regulate and tax commercial production, distribution, and sale of marijuana. But while Californians have been debating whether or not marijuana should be legalized, there are current legal drugs on the market that have a more detrimental effect on the body than the longest long-term effect of marijuana ever will. One of these drugs that has just recently started to become popular goes by the name “Spice,” or “K-2.” It’s a synthetic cannabis that when smoked produces a high in most people similar to the experience of smoking marijuana. Although the drug offers the same high and is undetectable to drug tests, the fact that it is manufactured and constructed with numerous chemical components makes it a potentially dangerous substance, one that can give you an unpredictable high. Dr. Allan Frankel, founder of Green Bridge Medical Center, a cannabis physician office in Marina Del Rey, doesn’t recommend the use of substances like Spice. He said that “there is
[See Substitutes, page 3]
Ariana Masters Corsair Vince Slevin, director of budget management and new voters project coordinator for CALPIRG, at the Associate Students Board meeting last Monday. Efforts to discuss the $1.50 student organizing fee sparked a heated debate bewteen directors. The meeting ended with he fee being rescinded.
Fee revoked, board provoked By Ariana Masters Staff Writer After four weeks of seemingly endless debate over the $1.50 student-organizing fee, the Associated Students’ Board of Directors voted to rescind the fee. However, the decision by the AS Board still has to be ratified by the Joint Council. If the Joint Council ratifies the board’s decision then CALPIRG will remain unfunded by the AS, but they still have a number of avenues open with which to seek financial funding. Speaking after the vote, Vince Slevin, the new voters project
coordinator for CALPIRG and the AS director of Budget Management, expressed disappointment at the board’s verdict. “I think it’s dangerous for the AS to start second guessing the voice of the student body, that’s a dangerous precedent. If we question their votes in this election what’s to stop us from questioning the votes that put us in office,” said Slevin. At the start of proceedings hopes were high that a satisfactory decision could be reached. However, as the meeting drew on, obstacles arose as dissimilar viewpoints were levied.
Leo Leung, Inter Club Council chair, said, “People think that if we don’t have this fee, then students will lose their voice, and there will be global warming, and all the penguins will die… but this is not true. We have other groups working on these issues.” In response, Slevin stated they must represent the voice of the students as best they can. “It’s very important we represent those student voices on campus, and that is what the student organizing fee allows us to accomplish.” The board members were not the only ones with a vested interest in the outcome, and
various groups provided opinions on the issue. “Think about it like this: Don’t think that they are taking $1.50 from you, but for one day you won’t be drinking a cup of coffee,” said Santa Monica College student, Bryce Jensen, who added that “there are lot of good things you can take from a small amount.” The board voted with seven raised hands to rescind the fee. They have also decided, however, that the decision must go to joint council. “This decision needs to go to joint council based on our constitution,” said Slevin. “I look forward to giving joint council an opportunity to hear about it.”
Santa Monica City Council candidates answer Y With the November elections looming, council candidates are keen to stake their claims By Alexandra Leighton Staff Writer In less than three weeks, the residents of Santa Monica will elect five new city council members. Each resident will have the opportunity to cast their vote for three 4-year candidates and two 2-year candidates as well as a “yes” or “no” vote for propositions such as the tax increase Measure Y.
This past Monday, The Santa Monica Mirror hosted all 15 candidates and a modest group of Santa Monica citizens at the Santa Monica Public Library for a strictly enforced one-minute question-and-answer forum to assist the city’s voters in getting to know each of the Nov. 2 hopefuls. Of the candidates, ten would be first term council members. Fresh faces up for a two-year term include the chairman of the Pico Improvement organization, Robert Kronovet, Santa Monica Observer’s Publisher David Ganezer,
and founder of Santa Monica Tenants’ Rights Clinic, Susan Hartley, all of whom are opposed to Measure Y’s sales tax increase. The incumbents for this term are Gleam Davis, lawyer, and Terry O’Day who served on the planning commission prior to his appointment to Council. Both support the tax increase. There are six new candidates vying for the three 4-year seats which the incumbents, Bob Holbrook, Pam O’Connor, and Kevin McKeown hope to recapture: Jerry Rubin,
[See Elections, page 3]
Geraldine Planchart Corsair Jon Louis Mann, Santa Monica City Council candidate for 2010, talks of his support to legalize marijuana.