WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2025
Federal Termination of Key Unemployment Grants Impacts Oregon Employment Department and Southern Oregon Communities
By: John Oliver
The Oregon Employment Department (OED) is facing a sudden reduction in federal funding following the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) decision to terminate four major unemployment insurance (UI) grants ahead of schedule. On May 22, OED was formally notified that the grants, totaling over $12 million in federal support, no longer align with the Department of Labor’s stated priorities. The move has already resulted in the elimination of several positions and could have ripple effects for communities across the state, including those in Southern Oregon.
Among the grants rescinded is the Unemployment Insurance Navigator Grant, a $3 million initiative awarded in 2022. This program funded collaborations with three community-based organizations that helped historically underserved populations access unemployment benefits. With the grant originally scheduled to run through midJune, its early termination effectively ends outreach work that was ongoing in several rural and urban pockets of Oregon, including potentially underserved areas in Jackson and Josephine counties.
The second discontinued grant, Equitable Access to Unemployment Insurance (EAUI), provided $4.5 million to improve the accessibility of UI benefits through upgraded digital tools, new multilingual resources, and targeted outreach efforts. Like the Navigator Grant, it was designed to address long-standing equity gaps in unemployment benefit delivery, particularly among non-English-speaking and low-income communities. With a formal end date of June 30, the early cut is unlikely to drastically interrupt customer-facing services, as the employees involved were on temporary rota-
tions. However, the cessation halts further development of equity-focused improvements that were still in progress.
The UI Integrity Grant, a $1.7 million fund awarded in 2023, was directly tied to OED’s ability to recover overpayments. It financed eight temporary roles within the department’s Contributions and Recovery Division. With the grant now voided, seven of those positions have already been cut. This loss of staffing is expected to slow down the department’s ability to recoup funds from individuals who received benefits they were later deemed ineligible for. In Southern Oregon, where economic instability and seasonal employment patterns can lead to complex benefit situations, reduced enforcement capacity may result in delays and missed recoveries.
Also rescinded is the UI Tiger Team Grant. Initially providing $3 million for various modernization projects, most of the associated work was completed prior to the termination notice. How-
ever, about $370,000 had been allocated in 2023 for a yet-to-begin project involving outside consultants. The project’s goal was to simplify the department’s most frequently issued letters to improve clarity for benefit recipients. The termination effectively cancels that initiative before its launch.
The Oregon Employment Department, in conjunction with Governor Tina Kotek’s office and legal counsel, is now evaluating the broader impact of the sudden loss of federal funding. While some projects were near completion and staff involvement was structured to mitigate direct layoffs, the cumulative effect on the department’s long-term strategies for outreach, modernization, and equitable access remains a concern.
Southern Oregon communities, particularly those in rural regions and among marginalized populations, may be disproportionately affected by the cancellation of these programs. The Navigator and EAUI grants were designed to fill systemic gaps in access and communication—critical areas
for residents who may not be digitally connected or familiar with state-run benefit systems. Local nonprofit partners that previously collaborated with the state under these grants may also experience disruptions in funding and operations as a result.
The rescinded funding also underscores the continued financial volatility of state-federal partnerships in unemployment administration. Oregon’s unemployment system faced extensive scrutiny during the COVID-19 pandemic for delayed payments and system overload. These grants were part of broader efforts to modernize and restore public trust in the system. With the federal government now pulling back, the burden of sustaining improvements falls back to the state.
While OED leadership has expressed confidence in the work already completed under the grants, there is a growing sense of frustration about the diminishing resources available to support ongoing customer service improvements and enforcement capabilities. Communities in Southern Oregon—already navigating economic recovery, high housing costs, and rising inflation—may feel the effects more acutely if outreach and recovery efforts slow or stall.
The Oregon Employment Department has not yet released detailed next steps regarding how it plans to adjust its workload or funding structure following the termination of these grants. However, discussions with legal advisors and the Governor’s office are ongoing. What remains clear is that the sudden shift in federal priorities has left Oregon—and particularly its vulnerable populations—without critical resources that were meant to ensure equitable and efficient access to unemployment benefits.
Public Forum on Homeless Solutions and Grant Program
Grants Pass Prepares to Host
By E. Ward
The City of Grants Pass is preparing to host a public forum to address one of the most pressing challenges facing the community—homelessness. Scheduled for Monday, June 9, 2025, the forum will focus on the city’s Homeless Solutions Competitive Grant Program, a new initiative designed to provide structured funding for practical and sustainable responses to the city’s ongoing need to allow overnight resting on public property.
The event will begin at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 101 NW A Street in downtown Grants Pass. The purpose of the forum is twofold: first, to inform the public about the grant program and its intended impact, and second, to gather community feedback and answer questions from residents about how the city plans to approach homelessness solutions in the
coming months.
The evening will open with a presentation by city staff, who will provide a historical overview of the city’s homelessness response efforts, the legal constraints that have led to the city’s current policies, and the motivation behind the development of the new grant program. This presentation aims to clarify why the city has allowed
overnight resting in certain public areas and how the new grant initiative may support alternatives that better serve both the unhoused population and the broader community.
The Homeless Solutions Competitive Grant Program is expected to provide funding opportunities to local organizations, nonprofits, and service providers who pro-
pose viable, actionable solutions that help reduce unsheltered homelessness. Grants will be awarded based on a competitive review process, emphasizing collaboration, long-term impact, and alignment with the city's strategic goals. The city’s hope is that this program can incentivize innovative projects that offer immediate relief while also addressing root causes such as mental health, substance abuse, affordable housing, and economic instability.
The forum will include a question-and-answer session following the presentation. To ensure a fair and productive
• see GRANTS, page 3
Proposed Water Law Spurs Concern in Southern Oregon
SB 1153 Faces Scrutiny Over Potential Impact on Farmers, Local Economy
By John Oliver
A proposed piece of legislation in Salem is generating growing concern among residents and agricultural communities across Southern Oregon, particularly in Josephine County. Senate Bill 1153, which is scheduled for an informational meeting and public hearing on Tuesday, June 4, before the Oregon Senate Committee on Rules, has been labeled by opponents as a significant overreach that threatens water rights, farming operations, and local food systems.
At the heart of the controversy is language in SB 1153 that, according to critics, would effectively rewrite Oregon’s existing water laws. Opponents argue that the bill could significantly curtail the flexibility of farmers and landowners to access and manage water—a resource that is not just essential to agriculture but foundational to the economic and cultural identity of rural Oregon.
The bill is viewed by some as a bureaucratic power grab that introduces increased regulation without offering clear or measurable environmental benefits. Farmers worry that such policies will lead to heightened legal exposure, reduce their operational stability, and invite costly enforcement actions for water usage that had previously been protected or permitted under current law.
This concern is particularly acute in Josephine County, where small to mid-sized farms, ranches, and family-owned agricultural businesses rely heavily on predictable and local control of water rights. A shift in that balance, residents say, could devastate long-standing family operations, hike the price of locally grown produce, and make
the region more dependent on distant suppliers. Many worry that the consequences will reach beyond farmland, ultimately impacting the wider community, from food prices in local grocery stores to the longterm sustainability of regional economic development.
Proponents of tighter water laws argue that climate volatility and ongoing drought conditions necessitate stronger environmental oversight. However, critics of SB 1153 contend that the bill fails to provide practical solutions or resources to help communities adapt. Instead, they fear it adds layers of red tape while ignoring the historical and legal framework that has governed water usage in the state for generations.
One concern shared among rural residents is that SB 1153 could establish legal mechanisms that unfairly penalize farmers through civil enforcement or administra-
tive penalties without providing them opportunities to comply or adapt. This could prove particularly problematic in areas like Josephine County, where water infrastructure and regulatory support systems are already under strain.
Adding to the opposition is the broader issue of trust. Many in rural Oregon already feel alienated from decision-making processes in Salem. For these residents, SB 1153 represents not only a threat to their economic livelihood but also a continuation of policies made without their input—policies that appear to target traditional ways of life under the banner of environmental stewardship.
Public testimony is being collected ahead of Tuesday’s hearing, and residents are being encouraged to submit written opposition. Local leaders, including farmers’ associations and property rights advocates, are organizing efforts to increase aware-
Grants Pass to Host Public Forum
From page 1
exchange, each attendee will be given the opportunity to ask one question, with additional questions permitted if time allows. Residents are encouraged to prepare their questions in advance, and written submissions can also be emailed to the city before 3:00 p.m. on the day of the forum. All questions and comments will be reviewed and considered as the city moves forward in shaping the program's implementation.
Those unable to attend in person can still participate virtually. The entire session will be broadcast live via Rogue Valley Television (RVTV) and will also be streamed on the City of Grants Pass You-
Tube channel, allowing broader access and engagement from the community.
City officials have emphasized the importance of public participation in the early phases of this grant program. The feedback gathered at the forum will help guide future decision-making and ensure that the proposed solutions reflect the community’s priorities, concerns, and lived experiences. With the growing visibility of homelessness throughout the region, the city acknowledges the need for collaborative problem-solving that balances compassion with effective action.
As Grants Pass continues to navigate legal obligations and community expec-
tations, initiatives like the Homeless Solutions Competitive Grant Program represent an attempt to shift from temporary tolerance toward long-term resolution. The forum on June 9 provides an important opportunity for residents to engage directly with city leaders and contribute to shaping the future of local homelessness response.
Whether attending in person or virtually, the community is encouraged to take part in the discussion, share their perspectives, and stay informed as the city takes the next steps toward implementing meaningful, community-driven solutions.
ness and turnout for the Senate Committee meeting. Whether or not the bill advances, it has already sparked renewed debate over how Oregon balances environmental policy with rural economic resilience.
For communities like Grants Pass, Cave Junction, and the broader Rogue Valley, the fight over SB 1153 is more than a legal or procedural battle—it’s about defending access to one of the most fundamental resources for life and livelihood: water.
Southern Oregon Embraces Pride Month with Regional Celebrations and Community Support
E. Ward
Throughout the month of June, communities across Southern Oregon are coming together to recognize and celebrate Pride Month, a time dedicated to honoring the history, resilience, and contributions of the LGBTQIA2S+ community. From local festivals to family-friendly gatherings, Southern Oregon’s Pride Month observances reflect a growing commitment to inclusion, visibility, and acceptance.
This year, Medford is once again at the heart of regional celebrations. The city will host one of the largest Pride events in Southern Oregon, organized by the LGBTQ+ Equity Workgroup of the Health Equity Coalition, a branch of SO Health-E. Scheduled for Saturday, June 28, the event will take place at Rogue X on Rossanley Drive and is open to the public at no cost. Attendees can expect a full day of entertainment, art, food, and outreach, including live music,
drag and dance performances, games, and information booths from supportive community organizations. The venue has been selected not only for its central location but also for its accessibility, ensuring that people of all abilities and backgrounds can participate. Event organizers have also prioritized safety and inclusion by incorporating interpretation services and a clear conduct policy to maintain a welcoming space.
Brookings, will kick off its Pride Month observance earlier in the month with Pride in the Park, held on Saturday, June 7, at Azalea Park. This event also offers a range of activities, such as DJ sets, group dancing, lip-sync showcases, and creative crafts for youth. A sensory-friendly area will be available to create a calm space for those in need of a break from the day’s activities. As a gesture of hospitality and unity, the organizers are offering a free community
meal to all attendees. The Brookings celebration aims to bring together people from surrounding coastal towns and provide a platform for connection, celebration, and education in a region where LGBTQIA2S+ events have historically been limited.
Meanwhile, Ashland is preparing for its main Pride event later in the year, with the city continuing its tradition of holding its festival in October. Southern Oregon Pride, the organization behind the Ashland celebration, maintains year-round programming focused on advocacy, awareness, and engagement. Even outside of their main annual event, Ashland residents are encouraged to use June to reflect on progress made and challenges still facing the LGBTQIA2S+ community.
These events are part of a broader effort across Southern Oregon to foster inclusive environments and ensure that LGBTQIA2S+ residents feel seen and supported. While
major cities like Portland often receive national attention for their Pride events, rural and smaller communities like those in Southern Oregon are increasingly stepping up to show that inclusion is not limited by geography. Organizers in Medford, Brookings, and Ashland have worked to ensure that Pride Month is not only celebratory but also educational and accessible, bridging gaps in understanding and reinforcing the importance of community-based support. Southern Oregon’s participation in Pride Month serves as a reminder that inclusion and equality begin at the local level. The range of events—from bustling public festivals to quieter acts of solidarity—reflects a regional culture that is evolving with the times. As more residents show up to celebrate and support their neighbors, the region takes a collective step toward creating a more accepting and respectful community for all.
Official Eviction Watch Countdown Begins: Library Supporters Mark 147 Days of Uncertainty
By John Oliver
After 147 days of silence, inaction, and increasing anxiety, the tension between Josephine County leadership and the Grants Pass public library is reaching a critical turning point. Tomorrow, June 5, marks the official launch of “Eviction Watch”—a grassroots accountability campaign designed to monitor the ticking clock toward what could become a forced removal of library materials, staff, and patrons.
It has now been 21 full weeks since the Josephine County Board of Commissioners—Chris Barnett, Ron Smith, and John West—voted abruptly on January 6 to terminate the library’s lease at its current facility. That vote came without warning, without meaningful public dialogue, and without any clear plan to support one of the county’s most relied-upon civic institutions.
Since then, the commissioners have offered little more than vague remarks, canceled meetings, and a seemingly deliberate avoidance of follow-up discussion. Meanwhile, the library continues to operate under a cloud of uncertainty, with no new lease, no formal resolution, and no
guarantees of long-term stability. Supporters of the library say that changes tomorrow.
On Thursday, the Friends of the Library will debut the “Eviction Watch” countdown clock at grantspassfol.wixsite.com/ gpfol, tracking the number of days until the county could legally force the library out. That legal deadline sits roughly 210 days away—just 30 weeks—giving library advocates a narrow window to push back against what they see as a politically motivated attempt to gut a crucial community service.
The group hopes the countdown clock will do more than keep time—it’s meant to sound an alarm. For months, library work-
ers and patrons have been left in limbo, unsure of whether the doors will remain open or slammed shut with little notice. And while time keeps moving forward, the commissioners have made little effort to engage in a transparent, solution-focused process.
The abrupt termination of the lease back in January was a jarring moment for many in the community, not only because of what it meant for the library’s future but also because of how it was handled—without input, without explanation, and without regard for public interest.
Since that vote, there has been no proposed relocation plan, no public discussion of alternative uses for the space, and
no offer of compromise. What the community has gotten instead is 21 weeks of evasion and excuse-making, as the library continues to serve hundreds of residents daily under the looming threat of eviction. Tomorrow’s launch of “Eviction Watch” is a direct response to that silence. The Friends of the Library are encouraging citizens to visit the site, follow the countdown, and share the message with neighbors. The goal is simple: don’t let the commissioners quietly erase a vital piece of local infrastructure while no one is watching.
While the eviction clock may have just started ticking in public, the pressure has been building for months behind the scenes. With less than eight months left before the county could exercise its power to remove the library, time is no longer a luxury the community can afford to waste. Supporters are urging residents to stay vigilant, informed, and active—because tomorrow isn’t just June 5. It’s the start of a community’s countdown to defend its access to knowledge, education, and public space from political indifference. The eviction may not be official yet, but the warning is loud and clear: the time to act is now.
SUPPORT FREE SPEECH
Advertise with The Grants Pass Tribune!
Stand with us in defending freedom of the press and the 1st Amendment! The Grants Pass Tribune is facing political persecution, with lawsuits aimed at silencing our bold investigative journalism. We remain committed to uncovering the truth and keeping our community informed like never before.
Show your support for independent journalism and the fight against political tyranny. Place your ad with us and align your business with the values of free speech and transparency.
The BCC Weekly - Taking the “Blind” out of the BCC
It’s All About The County Budget This Week
By: Jay Meredith, CPA Investigative Journalist
It was almost exactly 12 months ago when last year’s County Budget Committee and last year’s Board of County Commissioners (BCC) disrespected County voters in a big way and took General Fund money away from the Sheriff’s budget just six months after County voters said yes to a Law Enforcement Service District measure on the November 2023 ballot. This prevented the Sheriff from fulfilling his campaign promises for the Law Enforcement Service District over the last year. In my opinion and the opinion of many others, this was also one of several actions that led to the recall of former County Commissioner John West.
In an extremely abbreviated budget committee process this year due to the dramatic resignation of contract budget officer Simon Hare during the month of April, the County unveiled its recommended budget on Friday of last week and have a marathon budget meeting scheduled from 9am to 5pm today, Wednesday June 4th. Today the Budget Committee will hear presentations from most major departments, and they could potentially pass the entire County budget by the end of today’s marathon meeting. The new budget officer has recommended the Budget Committee finish its work by Friday of this week in order to meet the noticing and timeline required for the BCC to adopt the budget later this month.
This year’s recommended budget, when it comes to the Sheriff’s portion of the budget, is almost a repeat of last year’s final budget. But let’s hope this year’s Budget Committee and BCC have respect for the voters that passed the Sheriff’s Law Enforcement Service District in November 2023, because last year only a minority of the Budget Committee and BCC supported the Sheriff and County voters.
I’ll try to keep this simple because as someone that spent 10 years as the Finance Director for the City of Grants Pass I can definitely go into the budget weeds. The simple truth is that the Law Enforcement Service District that voters approved in November 2023 is bringing in close to $5.4 million of revenues for the Sheriff this year and will bring in close to $5.7 million of revenues for the Sheriff next fiscal year. This was supposed to be sufficient to increase the Sheriff staff by close to 20 additional staff members and finally return the Sheriff to 24/7 services for the first time since those devastating budget cuts in 2012.
But instead of allowing the Sheriff to fulfill those campaign promises, last year’s BCC took some general fund money away from the Sheriff budget that had historically been allocated to the Sheriff each year. Dan Mancuso, one of last year’s Budget Committee members called out the BCC for this “bait and switch,” and former Commissioner Dan DeYoung also advocated for the Sheriff. They were overruled by the majority and the
Budget Committee/BCC only approved the equivalent of 5 new staff positions for the Sheriff last year. Former and now recalled Commissioner John West argued that the Sheriff should only get 3 new staff positions, and thankfully he was also in the minority for this opinion.
And so, during the current fiscal year, if you’re a Josephine County resident that owns property outside the jurisdiction of the City of Grants Pass, you’re paying a new district levy and not getting what you’re paying for. You can mostly thank former County Commissioners John West and Herman Baertschiger for this.
I personally showed up at last year’s budget committee meetings and showed the BCC and Budget Committee how they could easily give the Sheriff at least $1.6 million more in his annual budget (only a portion of the general fund money they took away) and not have to cut the budgets of any other county program. The budget would have remained very well balanced and with all the proper reserve amounts in the General Fund.
At the start of this year’s abbreviated budget process, I’m feeling a sense of déjà vu. Because at the recommended budget level, there are only an additional 2.5 FTE staffing positions in the Sheriff’s budget. This is far below what the Sheriff told me a couple months ago he was going to recommend this year and what he needed to return to 24/7 Sheriff patrol services.
The Sheriff will make a presentation to the Budget Committee today and will likely request additional staffing. After a review of the proposed County budget, the County’s General Fund is in even better shape than it was last year and is positioned to grant just about any staffing request that the Sheriff might make to fulfill those Law Enforcement Service District campaign promises.
The County’s recommended budget for next fiscal year shows an increase of almost $4 million in General Fund ending balances from where we started this fiscal year. The
General Fund ended last fiscal year with a carryover fund balance of close to $15.5 million and this is projected to increase to close to $19.5 million by the end of next fiscal year. That’s an average budget SURPLUS of close to $2 million per year, eerily similar to the extra amount I advised that they should give to the Sheriff’s budget last year. And because budgets are almost never fully spent, absent any further budget changes, the County’s General Fund will likely end next fiscal year with a balance even higher than the projected $19.5 million.
It’s time to fulfill those campaign promises and honor Josephine County voters in the process. The BCC and County Budget Committee can easily allocate up to $2 million per year more to the Sheriff and other justice program budgets and still have a very well-balanced budget and a General Fund balance that is higher than it needs to be. Voters do not want a second year of paying for something that they are not receiving.
And there are some other troubling factors in this year’s budget recommendation that need to be ironed out by the BCC and Budget Committee. Staffing in the Community Development Department has been reduced from 11.35 FTE to only 4.5 FTE and there is one less staff in the Building division’s recommended budget. Commissioners need to explain why they laid off everyone in code enforcement and the impact these staffing changes might have on contractors and developers in Josephine County.
The recommended budget also includes 0.5 FTE less in the Veterans Service Office, 2 less FTE in Public Works, 2.8 FTE less in the legal department, 8 less FTE in Public Health, and even the Fairgrounds and Parks has 2 less FTE in the recommended budget. Hopefully the BCC and department staff can explain all the service reductions that might result from these staffing reductions along with why these changes are necessary.
And we’re still waiting on the BCC to explain recent staffing and departmental reorganizations that have been implemented by the BCC. For example, we heard from the former Juvenile Justice department director Jim Goodwin last week and the decision to combine the Juvenile Justice department with the Community Corrections department was made without even asking a single question of Jim Goodwin about the pros and cons of this combination.
Jim Goodwin, who is respected throughout the entire state of Oregon for how well he ran our local Juvenile Justice shelter and detention programs, resigned as a result of this uninformed and rash decision by the BCC. Although in fairness, only BCC Chair Andreas Blech made this decision during the 55 days that the other two commissioners gave him unilateral authority to make any personnel changes that he deemed fit. And not only was this department combination decision made without consulting the two department directors, but Jim Goodwin also confirmed last week that Commissioner Blech bypassed a state law that requires consultation with local judges before the appointment of a new Juvenile Justice director. Mr. Goodwin confirmed that he advised Commissioner Blech by email of this legal requirement before the decision was made, and the decision was hastily made without following the law.
There was likely no financial analysis done in making this and other personnel or restructuring decisions. This has been the trend by the BCC so far in 2025 when making major personnel decisions. We also confirmed through recent public records requests that the voluntary employee resignation program quickly approved by the BCC earlier this year ended up costing taxpayers approximately $765,000 and no financial analysis was done before approving this program. This was almost a complete waste of taxpayer dollars, in my opinion.
In summary, BCC “you’ve got some budget ‘splainin to do!”
Disney Announces New Round of Layoffs Across Entertainment Divisions
News Desk
The Walt Disney Company has confirmed plans for another round of layoffs, with the majority of job reductions set to impact its Disney Entertainment division. The move is part of the company’s broader effort to restructure operations, reduce costs, and streamline its business model in an increasingly competitive media landscape.
The layoffs are expected to affect a range of departments, including film and television marketing, publicity, casting, and content development. While the exact number of positions being eliminated has not been publicly disclosed, internal sources suggest the reductions will primarily be concentrated in non-production roles within Disney’s sprawling entertainment empire.
Disney Entertainment, which oversees the company’s film studios and television networks, has been undergoing a period of transition since Disney CEO Bob Iger returned to lead the company in late 2022. Under his leadership, Disney has prioritized efficiency, profitability, and digital transformation amid shifting consumer habits and an evolving streaming market.
Industry analysts say the latest cuts reflect a wider trend across Hollywood, where studios are tightening budgets and reevaluating how they develop, promote, and distribute content. The cost of original programming has risen dramatically in recent years, driven by the streaming wars and audience demand for high-quality content across multiple platforms. At the same time, growth in subscriber num-
bers for platforms like Disney+ has plateaued, prompting studios to reevaluate how much they are spending on behind-the-scenes operations.
Departments impacted by the layoffs include film and TV marketing teams, which play a key role in launching new content, generating buzz, and coordinating with distribution platforms. Television publicity, which manages media relations and press strategy for Disney-owned networks like ABC and FX, will also see staffing reductions. Casting departments that help match talent to upcoming projects, as well as development teams responsible for evaluating and greenlighting new shows and films, are among those affected.
The cuts are not expected to immediately impact ongoing productions or the release
schedule of Disney’s major franchises. However, the loss of experienced staff across these support roles may eventually affect the company’s capacity to respond quickly to market trends or promote new projects with the same depth of resources as in the past.
In recent months, Disney has been signaling a return to core principles and long-term profitability. This has included reorganizing streaming priorities, shifting some focus back to theatrical releases, and selling off or consolidating parts of the business that no longer align with its financial goals. Earlier this year, the company also took steps to reduce spending across ESPN and other network properties, as part of a goal to cut billions of dollars in operational costs over the next several years.
For employees, the announcement is the latest in a series of corporate restructuring efforts that have reshaped the entertainment industry in the post-pandemic era. As studios adapt to an uncertain future, layoffs have become increasingly common, even among legacy companies like Disney that have historically been viewed as stable, long-term employers.
The news comes at a time when Hollywood unions and workers are already on edge, following last year’s industry-wide strikes involving writers and actors. While the current round of layoffs does not affect unionized creative talent directly, the broader atmosphere of uncertainty continues to ripple through the entertainment community.
Disney has said it will provide severance packages and transition support for those affected by the cuts. However, some within the industry warn that continued workforce reductions could limit creative diversity and slow innovation—especially in an environment where fresh ideas and competitive storytelling are more critical than ever.
As the entertainment industry continues to evolve in the face of streaming competition, consumer behavior shifts, and economic pressure, companies like Disney are being forced to balance short-term financial discipline with the long-term health of their creative ecosystem. Whether this latest round of layoffs will help sharpen Disney’s strategic focus or weaken its internal support systems remains to be seen.
Trump’s Official White House Portrait Unveiled, Marking Visual Shift in Presidency
By Leaf Barret
The White House this week debuted the official presidential portrait of Donald J. Trump, a move that marks a symbolic transition from the earlier imagery that accompanied the start of his presidency. The new portrait replaces the initial photograph that had been used since Trump took the oath of office, offering a revised visual representation of the 45th president as his administration continues to carve out its legacy.
While the previous image was captured in the days surrounding the inauguration, characterized by a stark and formal tone, the newly released portrait presents a more refined and calculated aesthetic. It reflects the evolution of Trump’s presidency and the administration’s ongoing effort to craft and control the public image of its leader. Released months after Trump first stepped into office, the timing of the updated portrait suggests a desire to reset the tone and sharpen the optics surrounding the president’s tenure.
Official presidential portraits serve more than decorative purposes—they’re symbolic representations of leadership, power, and national image. Throughout American history, presidential portraits have offered glimpses
into how each administration wishes to be perceived, and this new image of Trump is no exception. It carries deliberate visual messaging, positioning him in a light meant to evoke strength, confidence, and command.
Portraits, especially in the digital age, have taken on even more significance. Once primarily displayed in federal buildings and government offices, they now circulate widely on social media, across news outlets, and in public consciousness. For a president known for his acute awareness of branding and media presentation, the rollout of a new official photograph is more than procedural—it’s an intentional move with calculated optics.
Observers have noted subtle but important differences between this new portrait and its predecessor. The composition, lighting, backdrop, and even Trump’s expression contribute to a more curated image of leadership. The choice of wardrobe, setting, and overall tone appear meticulously arranged to communicate a specific message about how the administration wishes to portray the president at this phase of his term.
The replacement of the original inauguration portrait is not unprecedented, but it does underscore the White House’s evolving
communication strategy. Presidents have historically updated their official photos to better match the tone of their time in office or to distance themselves from early, less-refined representations. In Trump’s case, the new portrait may reflect both a maturation of his presidency and a concerted push to redefine his public image amid an ever-divided national climate.
Throughout his time in office, Trump has demonstrated an acute focus on image and
presentation. From staged backdrops during press conferences to carefully selected photo opportunities, the White House has made a consistent effort to project control, confidence, and authority. This latest move fits within that broader pattern—a polished, composed image designed for widespread display and perception management.
Beyond the aesthetics, the unveiling of the new portrait also serves a practical function. It will be distributed to federal agencies, embassies, and other institutions as the standard visual representation of the sitting president. In essence, it becomes the face of the administration in hallways and offices across the country and around the world, making the precision of its presentation all the more significant.
In an administration often marked by controversy, media clashes, and a relentless news cycle, the release of a single photograph might seem like a quiet affair. But in Washington, even visual symbolism carries weight. The decision to update the president’s portrait speaks volumes—not just about how the White House views its leader today, but about the image it wants Americans and the world to see moving forward.
COMMUNITY
Josephine Community Transit Updates Route Schedule Across Grants Pass and Beyond
City of Grants Pass
Josephine Community Transit (JCT), the primary public transportation provider for Grants Pass and much of Josephine County, has released updated route schedules and service details as part of its ongoing efforts to better serve the community’s commuting and local travel needs. These changes, which affect both fixed routes within the city and regional commuter routes, aim to increase accessibility and offer more efficient service across the county.
Operating Monday through Friday, JCT’s fixed-route services now run from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., with new enhancements designed to better align with community use patterns. One notable update includes more frequent service on Route 10, which now operates every 30 minutes until 7:00 p.m. This route serves high-traffic areas such as 6th and 7th Streets, Redwood Avenue, Rogue Community College, and Union Avenue. This change is intended to ease congestion and provide more consistent access for students, workers, and residents navigating the city’s busiest corridors.
Other key fixed routes remain in place, each tailored to cover essential parts of Grants Pass. Route 20 continues to serve 4th Street, the Rogue River Highway corridor, M Street, Walmart, and the Grants Pass Shopping Center, catering to both residential and commercial travel demands. Route 35,
which services F Street, Agness Avenue, Beacon, A Street, and Grants Pass High School, remains a crucial link for students and neighborhoods on the north side of the city. Route 40, which follows 4th Street to Bridge Street, G Street, Booth Street, and Dimmick Street, provides access to a mix of residential zones and downtown destinations.
To facilitate late-evening transportation needs, JCT now offers booking through its Transit on Demand app for rides extending to the end of the service day at 9:30 p.m.
This digital service allows riders to secure trips during the evening hours when traditional fixed-route buses might not be operating as frequently.
Beyond the city limits, JCT operates several commuter routes linking Grants Pass
with surrounding communities, helping to bridge the gap between rural and urban areas. These commuter services run from 5:35 a.m. to 7:25 p.m., Monday through Friday, and are especially valuable for those traveling for work, school, or healthcare appointments.
Route 50 covers a vast stretch from Grants Pass through Rogue Community College, Wonder, Kerby, Selma, and Cave Junction. This route supports some of the county’s more remote areas, offering crucial transit connections for residents with limited transportation options. Route 80 serves the corridor between Grants Pass, Merlin, Hugo, Sunny Valley, and Wolf Creek, while Route 100 connects Grants Pass to Rogue River, Gold Hill, and Medford, opening up
cross-county commuting opportunities and access to larger retail and medical facilities in the Rogue Valley.
JCT also offers integrated transfer options with the Rogue Valley Transportation District (RVTD), allowing riders to seamlessly travel between transit systems with a valid transfer. This is particularly beneficial for those commuting between Josephine and Jackson Counties.
For those seeking additional travel options, JCT provides Dial-A-Ride services and maintains accessible transportation information for individuals with disabilities or specific format needs. Requests for information in alternative formats can be made by contacting the transit office via email, phone, postal mail, or in person at the JCT headquarters located at 300 NW 5th Street in Grants Pass.
Residents can also explore JCT’s interactive online route map, which includes visual information on bus routes, bike paths, and the Dial-A-Ride service area. The map offers a comprehensive view of how the transit system integrates with the broader transportation infrastructure of the region.
As Josephine County continues to grow, these transit updates reflect an ongoing commitment to enhancing public mobility and ensuring that residents, regardless of location, have access to reliable and efficient transportation services.
Tired of doing everything "right" and still feeling exhausted, bloated, and stuck?
At Elysian Women's Wellness, we specialize in helping women 35–55 balance their hormones, heal their metabolism, and lose stubborn weight without crash diets or two-hour workouts.
We use our Metabolic Optimization Method to help you feel like you again.
• Functional & traditional lab work
• Sustainable weight loss
• Hormone-friendly exercise & nutrition
• Expert support & accountability
COMMUNITY GRANTS PASS
AllCare Health Awards $35,000 Grant to Support Domestic and Sexual Violence Survivors in Southern Oregon
By Josh Balloch
In a continued effort to address the growing need for survivor services in Southern Oregon, AllCare Health has awarded a $35,000 grant to the Women’s Crisis Support Team (WCST). The funding will bolster WCST’s “Rise to End Violence” campaign, a regional initiative aimed at providing critical resources for survivors of domestic and sexual violence in Josephine County, northern Jackson County, and southern Douglas County.
The grant will support a wide range of essential services, including emergency shelter, counseling, legal advocacy, and community outreach. These services are considered vital for improving both the immediate safety and long-term stability of individuals who have experienced domestic abuse, sexual violence, or related trauma.
The Rise to End Violence campaign, which WCST has been expanding in recent years, not only focuses on direct support for survivors but also emphasizes public education and community involvement. By engaging the broader public through awareness campaigns and outreach efforts, WCST aims to create a more informed and responsive network of support that addresses violence at its roots and helps prevent future harm.
The funding from AllCare Health will help WCST continue to provide trauma-informed care, which is a core component of the organization’s approach. This model acknowledges the complex, long-term impacts of violence on survivors and emphasizes compassionate, individualized support that empowers victims to reclaim their lives and achieve independence.
As one of the region’s most prominent survivor support organizations, WCST has built a reputation for offering comprehensive assistance to those affected by domestic and sexual violence. Their team works with individuals and families across diverse backgrounds, tailoring services to meet the needs of each case, whether it involves emergency housing, navigating the legal system, or longterm recovery planning.
The grant is part of AllCare Health’s broader mission to advance health equity and promote wellness across Southern Oregon. By investing in organizations like WCST, AllCare is extending its focus beyond traditional healthcare and addressing the social determinants that play a significant role in individual and community well-being.
Violence prevention and survivor support are increasingly recognized as essential components of public health. The trauma caused by domestic and sexual violence often contributes to physical and mental health challenges, housing instability, and barriers to employment or education. Programs like
WCST’s can intervene early, provide safety and resources, and help survivors transition from crisis to stability.
This financial support comes at a time when demand for such services continues to grow, fueled by population pressures, economic strain, and ongoing societal challenges. WCST and similar organizations are often the first line of defense for individuals in crisis, and grants like this one enable them to maintain staffing, expand programming, and reach more people in need.
In partnering with WCST, AllCare Health reinforces its commitment to building safer, healthier communities in Southern Oregon. The collaboration reflects a shared goal of not only responding to violence but working proactively to end it through education, outreach, and comprehensive care.
For those affected by domestic or sexual violence in the region, this announcement offers more than just financial news—it represents a renewed commitment from local institutions to stand behind survivors and ensure no one faces their struggle alone.
TAKE A BREAK
June 2, 2025
Posting Date
June 2, 2025
June 2, 2025
Letter from the Editor
Don’t Let a Few Clowns Ruin the Whole Parade
Last week, I stepped outside the bubble. Traded the pine trees and potholes of Grants Pass for the concrete chaos of one of the largest cities in the world. It’s the kind of place where 10 million people are jammed into a space barely bigger than the Applegate Valley, and yet somehow everyone manages to get through the day without collapsing into screaming matches over library leases or broadband boards.
Coming back home, as always, is a refreshing culture shock. Not because Grants Pass is better or worse—but because it’s real. Real people, real conversations, real consequences. That’s what makes this community special. We’re not just names on a voter roll; we’re neighbors, business owners, volunteers, and the occasional outspoken newspaper editor. We see each other in the grocery store, at city council meetings, or walking our dogs along the river. This isn’t a faceless metropolis where your voice gets lost in the noise. This is a town where your voice matters. Or at least, it should.
Which brings me to the point of this letter: people are people, no matter where you are. And unfortunately, that means there’s always going to be a few fools in the crowd. You know the type. The loud ones. The attention-seekers. The drama dealers. They pop up at council meetings with wild conspiracy theories, they clog up public comment with personal vendettas, and they post rants online like they’re auditioning for a reality show no one asked for.
But here’s the thing—don’t let a few clowns turn the whole town into a circus.
Grants Pass is worth more than that. We are a resilient, engaged, tight-knit community. Sure, we may argue over tax levies and library leases, but at the end of the day, we still wave to each other in traffic (well, most of us), support our local businesses, and show up when it matters. That unity is our strength, and it shouldn’t be weakened just because a few self-serving characters figured out how to turn public service into personal theater.
Every week, I get phone calls. I won’t say from whom but let’s just say they’re not exactly nobodies. These are longtime business owners, civic leaders, and everyday citizens who are fed up. Fed up with the lies, the power plays, and the nonsense being peddled like it’s gospel truth. Some voted for the people currently in power,
some didn’t. But almost all of them are starting to say the same thing: this isn’t what they signed up for.
And no, I’m not here to make this a red-versus-blue debate. This is about integrity, not party lines. This is about accountability, not ideology. This is about a town that deserves better than a handful of headline-hungry hacks who think leadership means silencing critics and playing favorites.
Still, I get it. Sometimes you need a break. Sometimes you need to tune it all out and focus on your own sanity. That’s perfectly normal. In fact, it’s healthy. But what’s not okay is checking out for good. Because when we disengage completely, we leave the door wide open for the worst voices to fill the vacuum.
So yes, speak up. Show up. Vote. Protest. Or, if you need to, take a breather and come back swinging when
you’re ready. Just don’t hand over your community to the clowns and call it a day.
We at the Grants Pass Tribune will keep doing our part. We’ll keep reporting. We’ll keep investigating. We’ll keep holding the mirror up—whether local leaders like what they see or not. Because democracy isn’t supposed to be comfortable. It’s supposed to be honest. And that honesty starts with all of us not being afraid to call out the circus when we see it.
So, keep your eyes open. Keep your mind sharp. And for heaven’s sake, don’t let the idiots ruin politics—or your love for this community. Most folks around here are good people. Let’s not let the few bad apples hijack the whole orchard.
Thanks for reading. Thanks for caring. And as always— keep paying attention.
