$1.00
February 11, 2021
ADAMS & JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO
A publication of
WestminsterWindow.com
VOLUME 76 | ISSUE 16
No deal on Westminster water rates
Westminster’s Big Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility along Huron Street. Upgrades to Big Dry Creek is listed in Westminster’s sewer capital improvement for future projects, which will affect sewer rates. On the water side, Westminster is planning to complete construction of a water treatment facility by 2025. To finance these future projects, council will be faced with a vote in May or June on whether to increase rates for 2022. PHOTO BY LIAM ADAMS
BY LIAM ADAMS LADAMS@COLORADOCOMMUNITYMEDIA.COM
Westminster City Council made it clear that there are two sides who still feel very different about water rates during a Jan. 28 study session, One side is adamant about lowering rates, the other group endorses the current trajectory based on recommendations from city staff. Councilors on both ends indicated they won’t change their opinion in the near future. By May, they will have to vote on rates for 2022. The cost of water has been a major political litmus test in town, ever since the Westminster Water Warriors launched a recall campaign against Mayor Herb Atchison, Mayor Pro Tem Anita Seitz, and Councilors Kathryn Skulley and Jon Voelz last year. The Water Warriors have criticized the four for supporting water rate increases. The recall group hasn’t targeted the three others, Councilors David DeMott, Lindsey Smith and Rich Seymour, who have called for lower rates. Water and sewer rates went up in 2018, 2019 and 2020, but not in 2021. However, it’s something council will have to consider for 2022, thus the reason for the Jan. 28 meeting. In the study session, staff reviewed major, future utility expenditures, and ways to finance it all. The biggest is what the city has dubbed, “Water 2025,” or the construction of a new water treatment plant. The current water treatment plant, Semper, has existed for 50 years and has about 15 to 20 years left, according to a city web page. Renovations won’t suffice. The city needs a new facility that can adapt to changing regulations, address future water supply shortages and is resilient when wildfires threaten the watershed, for example. The final sticker price is currently unknown. In addition, aging infrastructure, such as pipes, will need replacing, and the city is planning on other capital improvement projects for its water and sewer systems. Also, the city will need to pay off the debt it borrowed to help finance these projects. That means city staff will likely recommend increases in 2022, Atchison said at the Jan. 28 meeting. However, there might be different ways to get at that. The city could draw from reserves to help with utility infrastructure costs, thus lessening the percentage rates would increase. The entire council wasn’t opposed to that idea, but some members ultimately want rates to go down. “I don’t like the path we’re on and we need to make a change, in my opinion,” DeMott said. DeMott’s comment was in response to a question Atchison asked if the council wants to continue supporting the city’s “six integrated policies” for water delivery. The policies include simplification of water use tiers, enhancing fixed water revenues and maintaining single sewer rates, among others. Seitz pressed DeMott on which of the six policies he doesn’t support. SEE WATER, P2
INSIDE: VOICES: PAGE 8 | LIFE: PAGE 10 | CALENDAR: PAGE 13 | SPORTS: PAGE 14
Thornton mayor nixed Corchado executive session BY LIAM ADAMS LADAMS@COLORADOCOMMUNITYMEDIA.COM
Amidst confusion some members of Thornton City Council claimed to be having before a vote to fire the city attorney, Mayor Jan Kulmann rejected a key opportunity to clear the air. Council voted 5 to 4 at a Jan. 19 special meeting to terminate former City Attorney Luis Corchado. The four who dissented said they didn’t have enough information to be confident about their vote, a claim confirmed by emails the Northglenn-Thornton Sentinel recently obtained. Mayor Jan Kulmann, Mayor Pro Tem Jessica Sandgren and Councilors David Acunto, Adam Matkowsky and Angie Bedolla voted for Corchado’s dismissal. Councilors Jacque Phillips, Julia Marvin, Sherry Goodman and Sam Nizam opposed the motion. The four dissenters said they weren’t privy to the same information the other five were, noting that the mayor had reached out to each councilor individually about the situation before the Jan. 19 meeting. Kulmann said her decision was based on information she received from nine city employees about Corchado. A few councilors have alluded to nonspecific allegations of Corchado harassing city employees. No additional details have become public and Corchado has vehemently rejected any rumors or allegations. Furthermore, Kulmann pushed back against the claim that some councilors were in the loop and others weren’t. “No information was left out,” the mayor said at a Jan. 26 council meeting. She said councilors who argued otherwise were “politicizing a situation like this with inflammatory rhetoric.” A ‘serious concern’
A different story emerges in email correspondence between city councilors and city staff in the days preceding the dramatic Jan. 19 meeting. The emails span from Sunday, Jan. 17 to Tuesday, Jan. 19. The Northglenn-Thorn-
ton Sentinel obtained them through an open records request. Not all of the emails on the matter were available for inspection because they did not include certain words or phrases. “I would like to set up a time to talk with you over Zoom about a serious concern that I’ve recently learned about,” Kulmann wrote to Phillips at 8:50 p.m. Sunday. Never once did Kulmann use phrases such as “city attorney” or “Luis Corchado” in her correspondence. Phillips and Kulmann messaged one-on-one from Sunday to Monday. The mayor wanted to set up a Zoom call with Phillips and a third person whom the mayor didn’t specify. The mayor later confirmed at the Jan. 26 meeting that the third person was an attorney with the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA), the city’s HR insurance company. In Kulmann and Phillips’ correspondence, Phillips asked repeatedly for more information, to which Kulmann said little in response. At one point, the mayor said, “While I’m not comfortable sharing specifics, I realize my email was rather cryptic. I will share that I’ve received some very concerning complaints related to toxic work environment, harassment, and discrimination.” Phillips never indicated she fully understood why Kulmann wanted to fire Corchado. Phillips did speak with the CIRSA attorney on Jan. 18, but in emails from Jan. 19, she said she still did not have a full understanding of the matter. “Seriously, what is this even about?” Phillips wrote to councilors in a Jan. 19 email in response to Councilor Sherry Goodman. “It is clear we are all receiving different information.” At the Jan. 26 meeting, Kulmann said that conversations between council members and the CIRSA attorney was evidence that everyone had the same opportunity to get the same information. Emails from other council members on the morning of Jan. 19 show otherwise. In a 6:18 a.m. email to all of the council, Goodman SEE MAYOR, P2