L2- L3 Studio Units Catalog - Monsoon 2021

L2 & L3 STUDIO

UNITS CATALOG MONSOON 2021

About TLC CEPT University set up Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) to support and strengthen new directions in pedagogy and learning. The role of TLC is to that of a facilitator and a collaborator. It supports the functioning of the ‘Course Approval Committee’ as its secretariat, and functions under the guidance of the Deputy Provost (Academics).

TLC facilitates the following: a) Preparation for studio units and courses through structured workshops b) Innovation in teaching methods by partnering with faculty members c) Faculty development through online learning resources and peer learning For more information, please visit our website Teaching and Learning Center at https://cept.ac.in/tlc

L 2 & L 3

S T U D I O

UNITS CATALOG MONSOON 2021 V

V

V

VI

VI

VI

Contents L2&L3 STUDIO Introduction XII

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AR2037 Design Development Construction Estimation Akul Modi, Shivani Kapadia

16

AR2021 Space Kinematics Anuj Anjaria, Muntaha Rushnaiwala

22

AR2024 Climate Responsive Architecture Hiten Chavda, Ravi Kashyap

28

AR2028 Learning Spaces: Beyond Schooling Mitesh Panchal, Anagha Joshi

34

AR2036 Design in Detail Nilang Pandya, Jahnvi Bhatt

40

AR2029 Design Fundamentals of Space Making Percy Pithawala, Krishna Shah

AR2013 Making Living Places: Craftsmanship, Song and Imagination Puneet Mehrotra, Juzar Lanewala

46

AR2035 Exploring The Nature Of The Institution Of Learning Sanal Thathapuzha, Sagar Trivedi

58

AR2031 Body, Memory, Architecture Siddharth Singh, Sukhamani Brar

64

AR2016 Tectonic Operations -V Smit Vyas

70

AR2033 Span and Space: Exploring Tectonics in Architecture Vinod R Shah, Mangesh Belsare

76

AR2022 Spatial Narratives: Timeless and Experientially Engaging Architecture Yatin Pandya AR3036 Living Museum: Salvaging Le Corbusier’s Floating Refuge Arijit Chatterjee, Asha Sumra

52

82 88

VII

VII

VII

AR3037 Social Learning: Low-cost Private Schools in Ahmedabad Catherine Desai, Sebastian Trujillo Torres

94

AR3026 Retrofit an Ecosystem Chitra Vishwanathan, Ramya Ramesh

100

AR3027 The Urban Plot: Play of XL Architecture Deval Gandhi, Rohit Raj Mehndiratta

106

AR3018 The City and Performance Spaces – Performance Spaces as Urban Catalysts Jayant Gunjaria, Viral Bhavsar

112

AR3035 New Vernacular Architecture Martin Anzellini, Harshil Parikh

118

AR3011, Narratives in Architecture Meghal Arya

124

AR3033 Workplace Neighborhoods Nimit Killawala, Prateek Banerjee

130

AR3017 Realizing Nolli’s Dream: Embedding Architecture in the City Sachin Soni

136

AR3034 Verticity: The Future is Here Vishwanath Kashikar

142

FACULTY OF DESIGN BD2008 Expeditions in Digital Technologies Jinal Shah

150

BD2007 Beyond Mainstream Materials Rebecca Reubens

156

BD2001 Expeditions in Metal Sadasivan Iyer, Rudrapal Sinh Solanki

162

IR2027

Remodelling Residences Hamid Raj

168

IR2041

Design Geometry in Tiny Spaces Function- Design Transformability Gouthama D M

174

VIII

VIII

VIII

IR2032

Decoding The Poetics of Spaces Jagrut Raval, Koral Adenwala

180

IR2022

Reimagining The Vernacular Jay Thakkar

186

IR2033

Not A Child’s Play Priya Narayanan, Ananya Parikh

192

IR2040

Simply Fold: From Flat Surface to Kinetic Surfaces Shailesh Manke

198

IR2029

Traveler’s Home Shikha Parmar

204

IR2038

Hybrid Work(place)-From Objects Through Mediums Subin Jameel, Drishti Korat

210

IR2018

Art of Detailing: Elements and Structure Vasav Bhatt, Ajay Patel

216

IR2024

Exploration of Design: Material in focus Vishal Joshi, Ramesh Patel

222

BD3001 Furniture: Branding and Retail; A Complete Experience Naandi Parikh, Anand Belhe

228

IR3010

Reuse & Revive: Hospitality spaces Dexter Pereira

234

IR3011

Interior / Skin / Context Mohammad Ayazkhan

240

IR3014

Contextualizing Interior Space Making Prashant Pradhan, Bharath P

246

IR3017

Deviant Orders of The New Workspace Ratna Shah, Errol Reubens Jr

252

IR3002

Brand Building through Spatial Design Ruchi Mehta

258

IR3016

Child Centric Healing Spaces Sujit Kothiwale, Neha Kothiwale

264

IX

IX

IX

FACULTY OF PLANNING UR2005 From Utopias to Heterotopias Migrant Housing: Values of Time, Density and Culture Imran Mansuri

272

UR2022 What’s On the Plate - Sustainable Urbanism on Food Production, Consumption and Dissipation Katsushi Goto, Aditi Anand Kumar

278

UR2014 Light Infrastructures Kruti D Shah, Sebastian Trujillo Torres

284

UR2020 In Transit: Making a place between Arrival and Departure Mihir Bedekar, Maulik Chauhan

290

UR2016 Un-Gendering the Everyday City Sahiba Gulati, Shreya Gambhir

296

UR2021 Vulnerability In a Pandemic City Vrushti Mawani, Mariana Paisana

302

UR3005 Eco Warriors (Edible to Productive Landscape) Mansi Shah

308

UR3007 Water Urbanism Rajiv Kadam, Piyas Choudhuri

314

UR3003 Urban Planning and Regulations: Intent, Manifestation & Design Tulika Nabar Bhasin, Nishi Shah

320

FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CT2012

Deployable Structures: Concepts and Explorations Japan Shah, Anand Viswanathan

328

CT2019

Planning and Design of road infrastructure in hilly region Komal Parikh, Birva Joshi

334

CT2024

Geotechnical Parameters: Influencing Foundation Systems Pavni Pandya, Chandresh Solanki

340

CT2018

Designing Spaces in Reinforced Concrete Rachit Sheth, Kruti D Shah

346

X

X

X

CT2021

Designing Spaces in Steel Rupal Shah, Pankti Pandya

352

CT2023 Expoloring The Indigenous Construction Techniques and Reinterpreting Them in The Modern Context Sidhharth Srivastava, Anand Panchal 358 CT3008 Waste Management Through Application In Construction Bhargav Tewar, Nikunj Dave, Anjanee Patel CT3011

CT3012

Engineering Sustainability: Impact of Design, Material and Technologies Dhawal Mistry, Varun Yadav Project Procurement Management Reshma Shah, Maulik Shah

CT3009 MEPF: Services, Design and Coordination Shamik desai, Arpit Malviya CT3010

CT3013

Cantilevered Structures - Form, Material, Design And Construction Soham Shah, Nipul Patel Engineering Urban Water Systems Tushar Bose, Janki Jethi

364

370 376 382

388 394

Tutor Profiles

400

Editorial Team

412

XI

XI

XI

Introduction We are happy to place before you, the 2021 edition of Studio Units Catalog, for the Monsoon Semester. This is the seventh in our catalog series. The objective is to compile, showcases and share the range of students’ projects from the studios of Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch.), Bachelor of Design (B.Des.), Bachelor of Interior Design (B.I.D.), Bachelor of Urban Design (B.U.D.) and Bachelor of Construction Technology (B.C.T.) It is a matter of some satisfaction for us that we are able to place this catalog before you in these very challenging COVID times. The University has been operational in the hybrid mode, which allowed students to access the campus on only three days every week. In spite of these constraints, tutors and students found innovative ways to make models and have produced interesting work.

CEPT’s revised pedagogy lays emphasis on the new Studio Unit system.

Learning and teaching is centered on the studio units which comprises about 12 to 15 students. Each five-year undergraduate program is organized in three levels. A common one-year foundation is followed by Level 2 (L2) and Level 3 (L3) integrated studios. L2 studio comprises students from 2nd and 3rd year and L3 studio comprises 4th and 5th year students. The studio units have small groups of students led by one or two tutors, a greater curricular weightage in terms of credits and time, and a semester calendar which allows 4 weeks of uninterrupted studio work towards the end of the semester. The studios have a focused approach with specific learning outcomes.

L1 studios (not part of this catalog) are focused on building foundational skills and abilities required for an architect, urban designer, designer or an engineer. L2 studios clearly focus on developing one of the skills: Visualizing and Communicating, Analyzing and Designing, Constructing and Specifying, Planning and Organizing. In addition, all Level 2 units develop the skill for building arguments and rationales. In L3 studios, the students use multiple design abilities to solve complex design problems. Students develop the ability to exercise architectural/ design judgments. Design problems are defined based on a specific theme, approach (along with its rationale) or a theoretical position. The site, program and the area requirements may be defined by either the tutor or by the student.

We have had to identify new ways of working and this semester along with the print version, we are sharing the online catalog. We are also putting up an online exhibition along with an abridged exhibition on-campus. The catalog enables us to present consolidated outputs of our continued efforts.

We hope to share them with the larger community that includes people interested in the built environment, and education, prospective students, alumni and professionals from the habitat industry. This publication represents the work produced by around 820 of our students from 63 L2, L3 studio units taught by 110 faculty members and supported by 72 teaching associates and teaching assistants.

XII

XII

XII

We wish to express our profound thanks to all the unit tutors, teaching associates and assistants, students and staff involved in this effort. We also extend our sincere thanks to all our reviewers, jurors and guest speakers who have positively influenced the education of our young promising practitioners.

Tridip Suhrud Chirayu Bhatt Anjali Kadam

XIII

XIII

XIII

14

Krishna Patel AR3011, Narratives in Architecture Meghal Arya

14

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE

15

15

AR2037

Design Development Construction Estimation Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Priya Bhadja

Faculty of Architecture AR2037 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Bhumika A Balamatti Deeya Thakkar KARM PATEL Muhammed Ruzeb Vadgama Preet Bhalodia Pruthak Thakkar Rudra Shukla Yash Sompura

3 rd Year Dhwani Prajapati Disha Patel Reeva Dhabalia Rikta Parikh Roham Patel Shreyanshi Daftary Sreelekshmi L A Urja Chaudhary

Akul Modi

Shivani Kapadia

A typical architectural project comprises five steps: drawings, development, application, execution, and supervision. We generally describe them as conceptualization, design development, preparation of working drawings, estimation, and implementation. These key steps comprise the pre-construction stage of any architectural design project.

The prime focus of this studio is to provide Real-life exposure to architectural practice and construction processes. It shall concentrate on the systematic approach towards the development and execution of an idea, the in-between procedures, and tools (ensuring smooth execution of the project). The complete studio has been divided into three sections of design development, working drawings, and construction project estimation.

This course has been specifically designed for architects who will eventually work with contractors and clients for their design and budgeting purposes. Students successfully finishing this course will be exposed to the complete architectural/construction procedure, starting from the project to the execution stage.

To make the most relevant concepts, real-life exposure, guest lectures, and case studies will be specified.

16

16

16

Fig.1 17

17

17

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 All students’ Firm logo Fig 2 Reeva Dhabalia Bubble Diagram Fig 3 Ruzeb Vadgama Sunpath Diagram Fig 4 Disha Patel Company organization chart Fig 5 Dhawani Prajapati Design development Fig 6 Shreyanshi Daftary Working Drawing Ground floor Fig 7 Karm Patel Wall section Fig 8 Deeya Thakkar Bluebeam quantity take-off Fig 9 Yash Sompura One piece of Furniture detail drawing Fig 10 Preet Bhalodiya Flooring layout Fig 11 Preet Bhalodiya Electrical layout

Fig 12 Preet Bhalodiya Wall section blown up details Fig 13 Karm Patel Wall section blown up details Fig 14 Rikta Parikh 3D Model Fig 15 Ruzeb Vadgama 3D Model Render view Fig 16 Yash Sompura 3D Model Render view Fig 17 Ruzeb Vadgama 3D Model Render view Fig 18 Dhwani Prajapati Estimate Summary Fig 19 Rudra Shukla Estimate Summary Fig 20 Roham Patel Detail Estimate Fig 21 Shreyanshi Daftary Material Board

Faculty of Architecture AR2037 Monsoon 2021

Fig.3 Fig.2

Design Department

Architect

Senior Architect

Junior Architect

Intern

Interior Designer

Senior Interior

Junior Interior

Intern

Support System

Model Maker

Visualizer

Landscape Architect

Construction Department

Structure Engineer

Project Engineer

Contractor

Sub Contractor

Cost Estimatore

Quality Survery

Senior Project Manger

Director

Junior Project Manger

Management Department

Risk Manger Safety Manager Quality Control Manager

Accountant

Administration

Fig.4

HR/ Admin Housekeeping IT Manger

Fig.5

18

18

18

Fig.6

Fig.8

Fig.7

Fig.9

19

19

19

Fig.12

Fig.13 Fig.11

Faculty of Architecture AR2037 Monsoon 2021

20

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.10

Fig.14

Fig.16

Fig.15

Fig.17

20

20

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig 11 Fig.21 21

21

21

AR2021

Space Kinematics

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Darshil Trivedi

Faculty of Architecture AR2021 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Aarya Chandrasekhar Anirudh Chamarti Arya Panchal Dhriti Menon Ishitaa Dharachar Jheene Mehta Madhav Ram Manas Binoy Mihika Jain Neerja Joshi Nidhikumari Chaudhari Tejas Thariyan Vasudha Gupta

3 rd Year Abhishek Sondarva Harshal Gajjar Shruti Jog Vrinda K V

Anuj Anjaria

Muntaha Rushnaiwala

In the discipline of architecture, there are two kinds of spaces: one, which is static whose spatial quality shifts with the changes in the activities that take place in it, with the changing nature of light, with a change in its furniture layout, with the presence of various movement patterns and so on. Here the user, along with other natural external forces is in motion and the built form is stationary; two, which is dynamic in nature and transforms its spatial quality by moving/shifting/transforming itself through its envelope and/or the elements that make that very space. Here, the user is stationary while the built form is in motion.

This studio primarily focused on the designing of the latter kind of spaces. Space Kinematics is at the intersection of space composition, spacemaking elements, spatial experience, mechanical understanding, and movements in nature as well as objects. The primary intention of this design studio was to design and develop space-making elements that move, slide, rotate, pivot, or display a combination of all to serve a specific purpose.

The studio focused on developing logic of assembly processes for the designed elements and sequential understanding of construction techniques for the students

22

22

22

Fig 1 23

23

23

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Arya Panchal Plan and Section Fig 2 Vrinda KV Wall Section Fig 3 Vrinda KV Working Model Fig 4 Vrinda KV 1:50 Scale Model Fig 5 Shruti Jog Plan Fig 6 Vasudha Gupta 1:50 Scale Model Fig 7 Vasudha Gupta

Plan Fig 8 Aarya C Section Fig 9 Tejas Thariyan Wall section and details Fig 10 Ishitaa Dharachar Exploded iso of the mechanism Fig 11 Arya Pancha Working detailed model

Faculty of Architecture AR2021 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

24

24

24

Fig 5

Fig 6 25

25

25

Faculty of Architecture AR2021 Monsoon 2021

26

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

26

26

Fig 10

Fig 11 27

27

27

AR2024

Climate Responsive Architecture

Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Sai Kamala R

Faculty of Architecture AR2024 Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Ananya Vaidyanathan Anushka Barot Arjun Batra Bhoomi Lakhataria Dhwani Padh Krishna Vaghasia Varsha Kumar

3rd Year Mistry Shiv Devanshi Engineer Adiraju Vinuthna Aditi Shah Aryan Choudhury Esha Detroja Rutvi Raychura Sohamraj Ghelada Tanvi Prasad

Hiten Chavda

Ravi Kashyap

The Climate Responsive Architecture studio is aimed at sensitizing students towards climate by understanding comfort zones within a building in its given climatic context and investigating ways to create architecture that emerges out of Passive Solar principles. The Studio demands a resolution of the building keeping in view a strong climate response.

So essentially, the design problem is to design a building that exhibits an Environment responsive architecture. The studio works through an understanding of local climate, passive architectural features and material studies.

Study initiates with Vernacular architecture of the surrounding and international passive solar buildings to gain insight of Passive solar technologies, their integration into a built language and use of local material.

The design problem was that of an architect’s studio residence that exhibits both day and night usage. So as to explore a wider gamut of climate responsive architectural strategies, sites were taken in three different climate zones; Cold and Dry (Leh), Hot and Humid (Mangalore) and Composite Extreme (Jodhpur).Material selection and Form level ideas will be validated through climate analysis and thermal simulation software, so as to resolve efficient thermal and light conditions in buildings within their envelopes.

28

28

28

Fig.1

Fig.2

29

29

29

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Tanvi Prasad Plan, model and staggered form of section emphasizing heat gain in Leh Fig 2 Aryan Choudhury Section of sun spaces and details adopted for cold and dry climate of Leh Fig 3 Anushka Barot Design indicating building’s strong climatic response to hot and dry weather Fig 4 Sohamraj Ghelada Section exploring thermal mass as an element for retaining heat in Leh Fig 5 Arjun Batra Simulation of stacking and staggered form used to investigate heat gain in Leh

Fig 6 Mistry ShivTransverse Section explaining stack vents and earth coupled cooling through Vaulted forms.

Fig 7 Varsha Kumar Exploration of tappered forms to facilitate day and night time ventilation Fig 8 Adiraju Vinuthna Accentuating butterfly roof form to act as a wind catcher in Mangalore Fig 9 Aryan Choudhury Iterations of conceptual development of forms in Leh Fig 10 Dhwani PadhInspecting form and usage of thicker walls to increase thermal lag in Jodhpur

Faculty of Architecture AR2024 Monsoon 2021

Fig.3

30

30

30

Fig.4

Fig.5 31

31

31

Faculty of Architecture AR2024 Monsoon 2021

32

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.6

Fig.8

Fig.7

32

32

Fig.9

Fig.10 33

33

33

AR2028

Learning Spaces: Beyond Schooling

Focus Visualizing and Communicating, Unit Assistant Harsh Chauhan Faculty of Architecture AR2028 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Anand Vora Bhoomi Bachani Jhanvi Goswami Khushi Parekh Prachi Shah Ria Patel Rushit Shah Shaurya Jain Uveshkhan Pathan Vaibhavkumar Jadav Yashraj Nayak

3 rd Year Jugal Patel Khyati Goswami Kaushil Madireddy Malay Pandya Samyak Jain

Mitesh Panchal

Anagha Joshi

Walking in the streets of our locality we often don’t realize what public spaces we have around us. Why don’t we usually know the different learning or activity spaces around us? Is it because we cannot relate to them physically?

Or because they are inaccessible? In the time of pandemic, we realized the importance of optimizing the resources and making them as multifunctional as possible.

The Learning spaces– schools, colleges and educational systems, are suffering a lot, currently.

With time, the views on educational systems– “schools” have been changing and now is the time to make them into informal learning spaces, which are beyond the basic learning needs.

The studio focused on learning spaces that are beyond schooling and “multifunctional”, and have the potential to become the centre in the neighbourhood. Learning spaces were designed for the 5 to 15 years age group. The sites were located in urban and semi-urban areas of the immediate locality of Individual.

The studio helped understand the scale and proportion of the required functions in the Learning spaces. It aimed at designing spaces with climatic concerns and appropriate construction technology, structural system, and material order. Students explored the multifunctional aspect of neighbourhood spaces which are accessible by all.

34

34

34

Fig.1 35

35

35

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 7 Rushit Shah Elevation of Proposal,Ground floor completely open for public, Amsterdam Fig 8 Shaurya Jain Massing development on site, Amsterdam Fig 9 Prachi Shah, Khushi Pareekh Sectional development, Ho Chi Minh Fig 10 Ria Patel Landscape plan expressing site & design, Amsterdam Fig 11 Bhoomi Bachani Elevation & view of proposal showing bamboo screen and green roofs, Ho Chi Minh

Fig.2

Fig.3

Faculty of Architecture AR2028 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Samyak Jain Exploded view context and construction, Amsterdam Fig 2 Jugal Patel Wall Section construction system, Ho Chi Minh Fig 3 Ria Patel Exploded view of intervention, Amsterdam Fig 4 khushi Parekh Ideal Learning Space Sketch Discription, Ho Chi Minh Fig 5 Prachi Shah Climate Analysis on Proposal & Development, Amsterdam Fig 6 Kaushil Madireddy Sectional View Celebrating Kings Day, Amsterdamv v

Fig.4

36

36

36

Fig.5

Fig.6 37

37

37

Faculty of Architecture AR2028 Monsoon 2021

38

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

38

38

Fig.10

Fig.11 39

39

39

AR2036

Design in Detail

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Jeny Dave

Faculty of Architecture AR2036 Monsoon 2021

3 rd Year Abhishek K Ansh Amin Anushka Poddar Ayushi Gupta Bhaumik i Suthar Bhavana Viswanathan Deekshiit S Dev Desai Disha Kothari Falguni Mevada Kruti Makwana Mauli Borkhetariya Samridhi Chauhan Sanjana Chaturvedi Sanjana Mehta Shreya Joseph

Nilang Pandya

Jahnvi Bhatt

This studio aimed at looking at the design practice to comprehend the execution of an idea and how a design is essentially a sum of its details. The way in which these details work together in a synchronized manner creates meaningful architecture.

The idea was to find an underlying intent and find clarity with reason in the design process through details. The role of construction practices is also of the utmost importance. Being able to articulate an idea in a drawing is equally essential to conceptualizing.

To begin this journey students took up an existing building and deconstructed it to understand design intentions, materials, structure, details and services. This was documented with detailed drawings which proved as a precursor to their execution drawing set. Design program of the studio focused on creating an incubation centre within Gujarat University campus, promoting start-ups and innovators to take their ideas and skills forward.

Students designed facilities like workshops, conference areas, and accommodation spaces for 5 persons with a small pantry.

One of the exercises running parallel to the studio, encouraged students to find details in ongoing sites and learn the execution aspects first hand.

40

40

40

Fig.1 41

41

41

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Shreya Joseph Wall section detail drawing Fig 2 Disha Kothari 1:100 scale model photograph Fig 3 Disha Kothari 1:100 scale model photograph Fig 4 Bhavana Viswanathan Sections AA, BB Fig 5 Bhavana Viswanathan First floor plan (1:100 scale drawing)

Fig 6 Shreya Joseph Staircase section Fig 7 Shreya Joseph Staircase details Fig 8 Bhavana Viswanathan Toilet axonometric drawing Fig 9 Sanjana Mehta Detail model 1:10 scale Fig 10 Ansh Amin Detail model 1:10 scale Fig 11 Anushka Poddar part detail model 1:10 scale Fig 12 Dev Desai Detail model 1:2 scale

Faculty of Architecture AR2036 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

Fig.3

42

42

42

Fig.4

Fig.5 43

43

43

Faculty of Architecture AR2036 Monsoon 2021

44

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.6

Fig.8

Fig.7

44

44

Fig.9

Fig.11

Fig.10

Fig.12 45

45

45

AR2029

Design Fundamentals of Space Making

Focus Visualizing and Communicating, Unit Assistant Ninaz Sonawala Faculty of Architecture AR2029 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Amaan Lokhandwala Anirudh Ramesh Divija Patel Ishwa Patel Kamya Sahu Mahek Mudgal Paryul Jain Rutika Gandhi Sanskriti Raju Satvika Jain Shreeya Luharuka Shreya K Stuthi Mehta Swar Solanki

3 rd Year Naga Sai Kerlepalli Sejal Kundalia

Percy Pithawala

Krishna Shah

This studio introduced students to the basics of Space making. In the initial stages, students explored various characteristics of space making through systems of movement such as order, path-space relationships, axis, hierarchy, rhythm, scale, sequential progressions, degree of enclosure etc. Students learnt to configure spatial characteristics through a kit of architectural elements to create varied spatial constructs. They demonstrated their learnings by undertaking a project of designing a pavilion located within landscaped environs of Kamati Baug at Vadodara.

The design program of a pavilion accommodates multiple programs such as primary health centre, book studio,crèche, cafe, dance studio, amphitheater etc. The design process guided the students to evolve their individual responses to natural boundaries such as rivers, landscapes and existing built structures such as Planetarium, Museum, Band Stand, Toy Train, Amphitheatre etc. located within Kamati Baug.

The exercise further tried to weave together individual pavilions within a spatial narrative through visual and physical linkages. The ‘Design Fundamentals of Space making’ exercise was inspired by the Space vocabulary exercises conducted earlier by Prof. Gurdev Singh along with the studio tutors.

46

46

46

Fig.1 47

47

47

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Collage of all studens work Space Making Principles .

Fig 2 Divija Patel Drawing, diagramatic process and drawings explaining the pavilion near banyan tree .

Fig 3 Santhan Kerlepalli Drawings showing the pavilion design at Planetarium

Fig 4 Shreeya Luharuka Process diagrams and drawings explaining pavilion near band stand Fig 5 Amaan Lokhandwala Process Models and Drawings showing pavilion design near Planetarium Fig 6 Ishwa Patel Drawings explaining pavilion design at river edge

Faculty of Architecture AR2029 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

48

48

48

Fig.3 49

49

49

Fig.4.

Faculty of Architecture AR2029 Monsoon 2021

50

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.4

Fig.5

50

50

Fig.6 51

51

51

AR2013

Making Living Places: Craftsmanship, Song and Imagination Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Girisha Gajjar

Faculty of Architecture AR2013 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Chirangi Shukla Chotaliya Dhruvi Dipesh Prajapati Kashish Sadaria Khushi Patel Varun Mistry Mihir Ramani Pushpendra Dudhat

3 rd Year Ninad Shroff Sri Nidhi Chilakamarri Yash Rabadiya Yashasvi Brahmbhatt

Puneet Mehrotra

Juzar Lanewala

The making of our everyday life is not an isolated activity but involves living with other lives and things. Stones and tables are as much alive as are the trees and the birds. Our everyday life is an entanglement of things. And it is this entanglement that constitutes a place. So how do we make things well? Or how do we make places of well-being? Where things share an inner likeness with other things, a relation of sympathy. Like the one shared between a day lily and a hummingbird or the hand and a door handle. This ‘shaping each other’ leads us to the necessity of craft and imagination in the making of things and places. While craft is concerned with the structure of things, imagination is a spirited flight into the world of dreams. But when both these apparently opposing actions do intertwine, there emerges a song, a creative entanglement emerging out of a graceful correspondence between the material of engagement, the action of tools and the activity of dreaming. To be able to grasp this correspondence the learner is placed with the requisite tools, in a practical situation, and asked to pay attention to how ‘this’ feels, or how ‘that’ looks or sounds’ to notice those subtleties of texture that are all-important to good judgment and the successful practice of a craft.

52

52

52

Fig.1 53

53

53

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Kashish Sadarai, Ninad Shroff, Yash Rabadiya Making living places at Nikol lake Fig 2 Ninad Shroff Study of element and unit place in Rani Sipri and its poetic imagination Fig 3 Yash Rabadiya, Ninad Shroff Living structure plan-Place with most affection at nikol lake

Fig 4 Yash Rabadiya, Kashish Sadarai, Chilakamarri Sri Nidhi Making of new living centers- An entrance court, A path, A pavilion, Garden and Maidan as an offering to the lake Fig 5 Ninad Shroff Exploration of a module Fig 6 Kashish Sadarai, Ninad Shroff, Srinidhi Poetic imagination of a living place as an offering to the lake- Plan and sections

Faculty of Architecture AR2013 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

54

54

54

Sense phrases •Smokey, sweet - Agarbattis and incense sticks being lit •Fresh, moist, earthy - wet earth after a night’s rain, lake water (makes me feel pleasnt; I want to take in deeper breaths) •Putrid, gagging - the smell of garbage and cow dung lining the street (makes me feel nauseous, dirty; I hold my breath) •Cool, smooth - the kota stone floor of the temple •Blistered, rough, cool - the metal railing of the temple •Warm, hard, cracked and sharp - the mosaic tile benches in the temple, warmed up in the evening sun •Clammer, screeching, rumbling, sputtering - vehicles passing by create a ruckus (makes me feel disturbed, irritated, and longing for some peace and quiet) •Crunching, grinding - the rough gravel underfoot, outside the temple and around the lake edge

Fig.3 55

55

55

Faculty of Architecture AR2013 Monsoon 2021

56

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.4

56

56

Fig.5

Fig.6 57

57

57

AR2035

Exploring The Nature Of The Institution Of Learning Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant RIcha Surati

Faculty of Architecture AR2035 Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Adreja Dey Hiteshree Panchal Pratham Chothani Virajsinh Parmar

3rd Year Aashka Vala Charmi Soni Deep Ladumor Dhruv Piprottar Dhyan Patel Kayvan Gogri Muskan Sood Nidhi Chauhan Prathamesh R Vernekar Shaimin Maredia Simran Mashruwala Yashodhan Mangukia

Sanal Thathapuzha Sagar Trivedi The studio is about understanding, exploring and learning Architectural design as a dialogue between body, space and surroundings. The studio aims to understand the nature of the institution and its relationship with the land and the program. The studio encourages students in self-learning and different ways of exploring the architectural program and design rooted in their own skills.

Shreyas campus has grown over a period of time.

It is situated on ‘Shreyas Tekro’ one of the small hills in Ahmedabad. The site offers a diverse range of land, flora and fauna. This gives a variety of physical contexts for each student to observe, understand and respond. Existing architectural context of buildings designed by Balkrishna Doshi and Kamal Mangaldas creates an interesting opportunity to understand responses to context.

The Studio focuses on two main aspects.

Program making and Understanding the place. Program making encourages students to go deep into the philosophy of Shreyas and understand their current requirements.

Understanding the place will explore different methods of looking and experiencing the site.

The studio program will emerge from different student group’s exploration of program making and experience of the site.

58

58

58

Fig.1

Fig.2 59

59

59

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1-2 Group Work : Yashodhan, Dhyan, Hiteshree Designing spaces for rest, play and gather in Shreyas Fig 3 Kayvan Gogri Sketch | Sense of Place- Shreyas Fig 4 Yashodhan Mangukia Sketch | Sense of Place- Shreyas Fig 5 Pratham Chothani Sketch | Sense of Place- Shreyas Fig 6 Simran Mashruwala Sketch | Sense of Place- Shreyas Fig 7 Virajsinh Parmar Sketch | Sense of Place- Shreyas Fig 8 Pratham Chothani Sketch | Sense of Place- Shreyas

Faculty of Architecture AR2035 Monsoon 2021

Fig.3

Fig 9 Deep Ladumor Text | Narrative Sense of Place- Shreyas Fig 10 Group Work : Simran, Shaimin, Adreja Developing program Fig 11 Group Work : Simran, Shaimin, Adreja Exploring design through model Fig 12 Pratham Chothani Exploring design through sketches Fig 13 Group Work : Prathamesh, Dhyan, Nidhi Exploring design through model Fig 14-15 Group Work : Kayvan, Charmi, Viraj Exploring design through plan | Sections

Fig.4

Fig.5

60

60

60

Fig.7

Fig.6

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10 61

61

61

Faculty of Architecture AR2035 Monsoon 2021

62

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

62

62

Fig.14

Fig.15 63

63

63

AR2031

Body, Memory, Architecture

Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Milap Salot

Faculty of Architecture AR2031 Monsoon 2021

2rd Year Aastha Parmar Aditya Sinha Maitri Lad Nafela Naveed Netri Jivani Serakumari Patel Shailly Thakkar Simran Parekh Vivekanandan Eyaleigai

3rd Year Aanchal Bansal Anshu Patel Bhavyakumar Satwara Jahnvi Jogi Mahek Makani Nainsi Chaudhari Parth Kerai

Siddharth Singh

Sukhamani Brar

During its emergence, creative work calls for two simultaneous foci - the world and the self; and as a consequence of this double focus every profound work is essentially a microcosmic representation of the world and an unconscious self-portrait at the same time.

The Thinking Hand, Juhani Pallasma As architects we don’t start with a blank slate.

Consciously or subconsciously we bring our histories, memories and dimensions of our ‘selves’ into the creative process. It is therefore important to acknowledge and access the diverse experiences that have formed us.

Starting with the design of small spaces of solitude, intimacy & congregation in a subterranean site, moving on to transform it into a home and culminating with the transformation of the home into a small institution, students investigated the relationship between the self and the world.

Two of the several questions that the studio addressed are: How is the creative process informed by experiences and memories? and, What is the relationship between body, memory, emotion and space? Students learnt to apply the method of accessing their experiences & memories through drawings, associational maps, collages & models and integrate them into the design process across different scales.

64

64

64

Fig.1 65

65

65

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Parth Kerai Autobiographica: My Childhood Home Fig 2 Eyaleigai Vivekanandan Developement (top to bottom) My Secret Place, My Childhood Home and My Community Place Fig 3 Anshu Patel & Simran Parekh Visual & Spatial Representation: My Room, Portraits, Body Studies & Vegetation Studies

Fig 4 Parth Kerai Subterranean house Transforming into the world Fig 5 Nafela Naveed Library: an Oasis amidst Sharjah’s Concrete Desert

Faculty of Architecture AR2031 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

66

66

66

Fig.3 67

67

67

Faculty of Architecture AR2031 Monsoon 2021

68

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.5

68

68

Fig.6 69

69

69

AR2016

Tectonic Operations -V

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Vihar Sangani

Faculty of Architecture AR2016 Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Adhrita Roy Nataraja Avaneesh Dhyani Savsaviya Hetvi Prajapati Mathew M Jayash Naureen Feroz Navya Pandey Niba Aman K Nishtha Contractor Parth Panchal Prachi Aggarwal Prakruti Parsiya

3rd Year Jayannti Singh Karan Gandhi

Smit Vyas The studio explored ways through which outdated buildings can become sites for creative thinking about construction processes. It introduced new programmatic requirements in an old precinct, necessitating actions of repair, replacement or introduction of alternative parts.

Through this, new formal, structural and material conditions were tested against the old ones in an attempt to find a wholesome architectural expression. As a result, the play of building elements, systems and technologies was anchored into the work by clearly responding to the given spatial and functional conditions, while at the same time, freeing the author to exercise personal imagination and desire. Undertaking a small renovation project, allowed students to gain knowledge of different agencies involved and explore a much wider range of design development processes. Each student, along with formulating a new schema, also learnt staircase details, door & window details, flooring drawings and toilet design. Above all, students learnt to see existing buildings from the point of view of structural possibilities and scope for intervention and also developed skills for identifying building language and developing its grammar through the detailing of architectural elements.

70

70

70

Fig.1 71

71

71

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Adhrita Roy Axo. Design Development & Sections Fig 2 Process Models Fig 3 Group Work Site Model Fig 4 Navya Pandey Auditorium-Plan & Sections

Fig 5 Avaneesh Nataraja Design Development Axonometric Fig 6 Parth Panchal Design Development Axonometric

Faculty of Architecture AR2016 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

Fig.3

72

72

72

Fig.4 73

73

73

Faculty of Architecture AR2016 Monsoon 2021

74

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.5

74

74

Fig.6 75

75

75

AR2033

Span and Space: Exploring Tectonics in Architecture Focus Vizualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Kathan Gandevikar

Faculty of Architecture AR2033 Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Abhishek Mahida

3rd Year Aaditya Gadani Aanchal Tejwani Anmol Patel Arin Mayani Devika A Dhriti Mistri Diya Benny Isha Mahajani Mathangi M Mehlam Makda Riona Shah Saloni Soni Shravya M Sivatmika J Utsav Patel

Vinod R Shah

Mangesh Belsare

The studio aimed at imparting the basic knowledge of local and global forms with respect to structural actions. It dealt with association of space and tectonics by developing the understanding of material, form and structure in such a way that students used this understanding in their design to integrate the structure and construction along with spatial qualities to achieve tectonic expression.

New materials like fibers, new technologies like 3-D printing and advanced methods for computing for parametric are becoming common. At the same time natural materials like bamboo and conventional materials like mud and compressed blocks are also finding their way in application with modern methods.

Architects need to equip themselves to exploit the potential of these materials and methods, for which conceptual understanding of structural systems and form is very essential.

This studio equipped students to design and detail out meaningful forms using fundamentals of structural actions and material properties along with construction technology; this process is essential for going from part to whole.

76

76

76

Fig.1a

Fig.2

Fig.6

Fig.3a

Fig.3b

Fig.4

Fig.1b

Fig.5

Fig.1c 77

77

77

Architecture UG Level-2 Faculty of Architecture AR2033 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Aanchal T. a) 1:50 section b) 1:500 Model c) 1:100 Model Fig 2 Abhishek M. 1:100 plan Fig 3 Saloni S. a) 1:50 section b) 1:10 Detail Fig 4 Shravya M. 1:50 section Fig 5 Isha M. 1:10 Detail Fig 6 Mehlam M. 1:100 Model Fig 7 Collage of students work Sketches and models showing studies of various natural objects Fig 8 Aanchal T. a) 1:50 Model of the Supported space b) Plan of the support Fig 9 Utsav P. 1:50 model of the support Fig 10 Aaditya G. Model of the supported space Fig 11 Abhishek M. a) Model of the supported space b) Model of the support Fig 12 Mehlam M. Model of the support Fig 13 Arin M. Model of the support Fig 14 Mathangi M. Model of the support Fig 15 Isha M. Model of the support

Fig 16 Riona S. Model of the proposed intervention (A aommunity space in Mandu, M.P.) Fig 17 Aaditya G. Model of the intervention Fig 18 Aanchal T. a) Model & b) Iterations for siting of the intervention Fig 19 Dhriti M. Model of the intervention Fig 20 Isha M. Plan of the intervention Fig 21 Arin M. Plan of the intervention Fig 22 Shravya M. G.A. Plan Fig 23 Utsav P. 1:100 Roof Plan Fig 24 Isha M. Model of the intervention Fig 25 Mehlam M. a) Model & b) Plan of the intervention Fig 26 Mathangi M. Model of the intervention Fig 27 Aanchal T. a)Model, b) Site plan & c) 1:10 Detail of the intervention Fig 28 Abhishek M. 1:100 Section of the intervention Fig 29 Utsav P. 1:50 section of the intervention

Fig 7

78

78

78

Fig.8a

Fig.14

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11a

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.11b

Fig.15

Fig.8b 79

79

79

Fig.17

Fig.18a

Fig.19 Faculty of Architecture AR2033 Monsoon 2021

80

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.16

Fig.18b

Fig.20

Fig.21

Fig.22

Fig.23

80

80

Fig.24

Fig.25a

Fig.26

Fig.27a

Fig.27b

Fig.25b

Fig.28

Fig.27c

Fig.29 81

81

81

AR2022

Spatial Narratives: Timeless and Experientially Engaging Architecture Focus Visualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Parshva Palkhiwala

Faculty of Architecture AR2022 Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Ananya Sahdev Andrea Samuel Disha Jain Jesal Padaliya Krishna Kodati Manasvini Suthar Suvidhi Jain Tirth Valu Trisha Karthik

3rd Year Damini Agarwal Devanshi Dhingra Ira Shukla

Yatin Pandya Space making is much more than an act of building. It has emotions and expressions. Design is a dialogue involving a designer who encodes messages and clues while the perceiver decodes the same. As space designers, we conceive and as onlookers, users perceive.

This module focused on this most fundamental phenomenon of space conception and space perception. It endeavored to understand fundamentals of space design as well as explored the role of space making elements such as floor, column, wall, door, window, stair, ceiling etc.

Through this studio, the impact of basic design decisions of siting and location, form and massing, movement and organizational structure, choice of elements, material and technique of construction, finishes and entablature were understood. The course focused on elements of nature such as light, vegetation, water and land as spatial elements and their role in space making. Using these as basic tools of space making, a space that is interactive with its perceiver, expressive of emotions as well as experientially engaging, was designed.

The module aimed at designing an emotionally charged campus such as a memorial, museum or spiritual center amidst nature dominated settings and deriving architectural resolutions for appropriate spatial narratives.

82

82

82

Fig.1 83

83

83

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Narrative through Sketches Fig 2 Damini, Trisha Form finding through models Fig 3 Andrea Samuel Kuwait War memorial Fig 4 Suvidhi Jain Razia Sultan memorial Fig 5 Damini Agarwal Memorial of Nature Fig 6 Manasvini Suthar Memorial of Swami Vivekananda

Fig 7 Ananya Sahdev Memorial of Kurt Cobain Fig 8 Axonometric representation Fig 9 Damini Agarwal Visualisation of Memorial of Nature Fig 10 Visualisation of spaces at eye level

Faculty of Architecture AR2022 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

Fig.3

84

84

84

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7 85

85

85

Faculty of Architecture AR2022 Monsoon 2021

86

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.8

86

86

Fig.9

Fig.10 87

87

87

AR3036

Living Museum: Salvaging Le Corbusier’s Floating Refuge

Unit Assistant Aksh Chauhan

Faculty of Architecture AR3036 Monsoon 2021

4th Year Protyoy Sen Dhruval Gadhvi

5 th Year Atul Krishnan Daksh Goel Hari Patel Keerthan B V Khyati Rajpara Meghana Toutireddy Namrata Ukani Rutvij Saini

Arijit Chatterjee

Asha Sumra

In February 2018, La péniche Louise-Catherine sank under the River Seine after a period of intense rain. This seemingly anonymous 70m long ferrocement barge is a lesser known work of Le Corbusier. In 2008, Louise-Catherine was designated a historic monument by the Direction régionale des affaires culturelles. Patrons of Le Corbusier in Ahmedabad are devastated by the deterioration of the vessel and are planning a Festival marking the 100th anniversary of the Louise-Catherine, in Ahmedabad in 2029. This will include building a full scale replica vessel to be moored on the Sabarmati River in front of the Mill Owners’ Building.

This Studio designed a living museum for the barge as under construction and the barge as a completed urban artifact. Proposals housed the construction of the barge and supporting festival facilities on the river edge. The river intervention was imagined as a series of props that sit within or atop a floating dry dock on the Sabarmati: both a temporary boatyard and living museum. This will enable the remaking of the vessel to be a spectacle for participants, curious observers and the city. Between the barge and the Mill Owners’ building, we designed a series of connecting facilities to celebrate the legacy of Le Corbusier in Ahmedabad

88

88

88

UA9516

89

89

Living museum: Reviving Louise Catherine Arijit Chatterjee, Asha sumra, Aksh chauhan Louise Catherine - ORIGINAL BARGE Keerthan B V Scale-1:200

Fig.1

89

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1.1 Arijit, Asha Drawings of Louis Catherine, Fig1.2. 1:25 scale model by Students Fig 2.1 Namrata,Meghana. Drawings of Buildings by Le Corbusier Fig.2.2. Hari Patel Detail Study of Hot Air Balloon Fig.2.3. Atul Krishnan Parts and Breaking of a Carog Ship.

Fig.2.4. Daksh Goel Construction process of Louise Catherine Fig 3.1 Daksh Goel Plan and Exploded Drawings of Living Museum

Faculty of Architecture AR3036 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2 90

Fig 3.2 Hari Patel Section of Living Museum Fig 4.1 Dhruval Gadhvi Site plan of Living Museum Fig 4.2 Meghana Reddy Axonometric Drawing of an Airship Hub Fig 5.1 Keerthan BV Exploded Axonometric of Living Museum Fig 5.2 1:25 Scale model of Louise Catherine and part of ATMA Building

Fig.3 91

Architecture UG Level-3

Faculty of Architecture AR3036 Monsoon 2021

Fig.4

92

Fig.5 93

93

93

AR3037

Social Learning: Low-cost Private Schools in Ahmedabad

Unit Assistant Tanvi Dubberwar

Faculty of Architecture AR3037 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Deepak Varma Riya Pai Varshil Changani

5 th Year Arsh Kania Drashti Kanabar Jhanvi Kamlesh Oza Kriti Kothar Ripalbala Pargi Shreya Shridhar Tarjanee Soni

Catherine Desai

Sebastian Trujillo Torres

Our studio investigated schools, learning how architecture supports pedagogical innovation and improves the experiences of students.

We departed from a social perspective, noting the vast spatial and programmatic differences between government, low cost and high cost, private schools. We used an iterative process of design and analysis, to make proposals for low cost schools.

Students transformed existing Ahmedabad schools which require urgent improvements.

They responded not only to the current situation but were asked to address further programmatic requirements in different phases and assessed based on how they responded to these shifting contingencies in the brief. Analysis was conducted using software developed by the Space Syntax Lab at the Bartlett UCL. This is not a parametric tool. It is used to understand how spatial planning enables types of social interaction in buildings. By the end of this exercise, students made a proposal for the selected building which comprised a new comprehensive pedagogical model in relation to spatial structures. They also produced a stimulating architectural inquiry into the possibilities of working on existing structures with remarkable budget constraints and complex social necessities.

94

94

94

Fig.1 95

95

95

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Tarjanee Soni Sectional isometric

view of the intervention in the Shahpur lal school Fig 2 Kriti Kothari Sectional Perspective showing the interventions and a normal day of school Fig 3 Deepak Verma Elevation of the Permiable facade Fig 4 Deepak Verma Views showing a students journey in school Fig 5 Jhanvi Oza Perspective view showing the exterior view of the school

Faculty of Architecture AR3037 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2 96

Fig 6 Varshil Changani Sectional perspective showing clasrroms and courtyards Fig 7 Shreya Shridhar Axonometric drawing highlighting the learning street Fig 8 Shreya Shridhar Internal View showing the transformation of spaces through season Fig 9 Shreya Shridhar Internal View showing the transformation of spaces through season

Fig.3

Fig.4 97

Architecture UG Level-3

Faculty of Architecture AR3037 Monsoon 2021

Fig.5

Fig.6

98

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9 99

99

99

AR3026

Retrofit an Ecosystem

Unit Assistant Rajashri Jain

Faculty of Architecture AR3026 Monsoon 2021

4th Year: Manali Kapadia Parita Upadhyaya Shiva Shankar

5 th Year Abhinav Jayanti Anupam Aserkar Chanda Patel Devyani Chandak Jui Magiawala Nechal Maggon Pooja Mistry Ritvi Broker Vipasha Chauhan Vrushti Shah

Chitra Vishwanathan

Ramya Ramesh

Our surroundings are predominantly made through designed actions that are governed by our need for comfort and capacity to alter natural ecosystems. However, have these actions resulted in an environment that we are willing to accept as a desirable future?

Disruptive, innovative thoughts and actions are required to create a future which is convivial.

One has to be able to situate oneself within the existing ecosystem and imagine new ways of retrofitting built spaces that recognize the interdependencies between people and the environment.

This studio explored how small, personal, designed interventions can initiate a possibility of change, in the way we live and in the environments we create. It was based on the philosophy that responsible and prudent consumption of resources and energy can not only create a better living environment but also a better society. Students immersed themselves in a 1 sq. km. precinct of Ahmedabad and studied and observed the existing ecosystem to ideate architectural interventions that can be retrofitted to create desirable futures. They were encouraged to work on architectural designs for resilience, to minimize negative impact and to celebrate environmental information.

100

100

100

Fig 1

Fig 2 101 101

101

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Vipasha Chauhan Isometric Views Fig 2 Vrushti Shah Sections | Fig 3 Nechal Maggon Proposed Sections Fig 4 Nechal Maggon Proposed Sections Fig 5 Vipasha Chauhan Perspective Section Fig 6 Chanda Patel Ground Floor Plan Fig 7 Chanda Patel Section The kitchen, Serving and wash located with regards to the Solar cookers and biogas plant

Co-working space, event space adding to the functioning of the cafe

Fig 8 Juhi Magiawala Section Fig 9 Devyani Chandak Anganwadi Plan 1 Fig 10 Devyani Chandak Anganwadi Plan 2 Fig 11 Vipasha Chauhan Section Fig 12 Vrushti Shah Axonometric View Fig 13 Nechal Maggon Axonometric View

A circulation path through the project

Temporary structures aiding to the permeability of the project

Overall , 15% of the site is permanent built on ground, 13.5% is semi-built / temporary.

30% of the site is built on.

Faculty of Architecture AR3026 Monsoon 2021

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

AR3026 Retrofit An Ecosystem

102

The Alternative Cafe

Isometric view & Perspective section AA’

UA7517 Vipasha Chauhan

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8 103

Architecture UG Level-3 A

01

Faculty of Architecture AR3026 Monsoon 2021

Fig.9

Fig.10 Roof area without sloping = 260 sq m Roof area now for collecting rainwater = 360 sq m Considering run-off coefficient 0.9, Annual rainwater collected = 2,55,600 lit

Primary Reflector North wall

Latitude

B

Sunken space for headspace

B'

Secondary Reflector

Solar Scheffler Concentrator ( 4.5 m diameter )

Sloping the wall to act like a roof to collect more rainwater

Sloping the roof to allow more sunlight

SECTION AA’

Fig.11 Collecting leftover food

Adding other collected waste and making slurry

Adding kitchen waste

0

3

6

12mts

0

3

6

12mts

Balloon type Biogas Plant 3m dia , 2.12 m height Capacity : 15m3

A'

01

Reed Beds (Filter bed)

6

3

0

12mts

Baffle Reactor Polishing pond (lily/ lotus pond)

Settlement Tank

A

01

AR3026 Retrofit an Ecosystem

1

UA7517 Vipasha Chauhan

Ground Floor Plan SECTION BB’

6

3

0

0

3 0

6 3

6

12mts

12mts 12mts

Treated water used for gardening 01

Isometric View Highlighting Ecological systems

A

A

01

DE-WATS (waste water treatment system)

A

01

A

A

01

01

1

2

3 4

Light Temporary cloth roof structures for spaces in the North and east, mostly shaded by the building itself

5

6

B

B'

8

7

B

B'

10

B

B'

26

Photovoltaic Panels as chajjas in the west facade

9 11

12

B

13

14

B

B'

16

B'

15

B

B'

25 27

17

18

24

23

Up

Photovoltaic Panels ( placed on surfaces that receive maximum sunlight)

Up

20

28 29 Bifocal Photovoltaic panels on top , to have a small greenhouse for terrace farming

19

Legend

Fig.12

21

22

Ground Floor Plan FIRST FLOOR PLAN

0

3

6

GroundTERRACE FloorFLOOR Plan PLAN A'

1

1

01

12mts UA7517 Vipasha Chauhan

A'

6 3 0 AR3026 Retrofit an Ecosystem

25. Wash Area 26. Drying area

A'

GroundGROUND FloorFLOOR Plan PLAN

Legend

UA7517 AR3026 23. Workstation Retrofit an Ecosystem24. Equipment Vipasha Chauhan Room 01

1

27. Solar Water Heater 28. Terrace farming area 29. Solar Photovoltaic Panels

A'

A'

01

UA7517 Vipasha Chauhan

Legend 01

A'

01

AR3026 Retrofit an Ecosystem

01

104

1. Wet waste deposition & Segregated waste bins 2. Leaf Composters 3. Fruit & Sugarcane juice corner 4. Quick Bite Eating space 5. Seating Area 6. Scheffler Solar Concentrator 7. Solar Box Cookers 8. Solar Stove 9. Biogas Stove 10. Serving area 11. Leftover Food and Plates collection 12. Biogas Plant 13. Storage 14. Wash 15. Hand wash and Drinking water 16. Shop 17. Twin Leach Pit Toilets 18. Co-working Space 19. Event/Training Space 20. Paper waste Deposition 21. Organic Garden 22. Open Ground

12mts

0

3

6

12mts

China mosaic layer Drippers

RCC slab 150mm thk

Air inlet Bricks

Water channel to hold drained water

Planters

Clog free nozzle for spraying water Exposed brick wall 450mm thk

Sandy Clay Grey water influent Salty Sand 1200

Gravel 25-30mm Gravel 30-40mm Outlet facility Geo-membrane plastic sheet

Reed bed

Passive cooling system

Cooling Tower

Reed bed IPS water proofing layer 25mm thk Thermocol waste hollow block slab 150mm thk Fly ash brick made of recycled construction waste Storage Rat Trap bond

Vegetation Earth Beam as lintel

Vertical wind turbine by Devecitech that converts wind generated by running metro into electricity

Recessed Opening Double glazing to avoid heat from entering building Flat hollow block slab made with thermocol waste to reduce weight of slab

Exposed brick wall

Retaining wall

Tensile material attached to metro column

charging dock 6V 3W dynamo generates electricity

Stand to hold bike stationary

Bridge suspended through cables from metro station structure

Phone charging exercise bikes

Seating with charging sockets

Playground under the ramp

Fig.13 105 105

105

AR3027

The Urban Plot: Play of XL Architecture

Unit Assistant Riddhi Panchal

Faculty of Architecture AR3027 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Aangi Shah Apurv Shimpi Dixit Tank Jillkumar Patel Kholia Tithi Khushbu Manish Parekh Moksha Mehta Srushti Delhivala Tamanna Vakil

5th Year C M Sanandana Devanshi Shah Heena Diwan Samyak Jain

Deval Gandhi

Rohit Raj Mehndiratta

The studio started with one’s own neighborhood, as its point of departure. Each student understood and formed the site respectively using their most intimate knowledge and memories of the neighborhood as notions of context were investigated at urban, architectural and human scales.

We challenged the students to understand the multifaceted way we can represent and narrate issues that help design architecture for and off the city. Understanding tools of narration and representations as key instruments of starting a design, our focus was to generate architecture from the ‘outside’, where the idea of the public realm/ space, social identity and ritualized time become parameters that are engaged with. We sought an architecture that reflected notions of preservation, cultural memory and identity as it simultaneously drove us to engage with technological progress and new systems of production/consumption that imposed programmatic variability.

Beyond great architecture as an end goal, the emphasis of the studio was also to understand design as a process that generated questions: to address the present as we build for the future; to address themes of identity and global exchange as we understand and inflect our most intimate spatial and cultural practices

106

106

106

Fig.1

Fig.2 107 107

107

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Jill Patel Final design Sectional elevation Fig 2 Jill Patel Mental map Fig 3 Heena Diwan Spatial Manifesto Fig 4 Dixit Tank Museum of migration Fig 5 Khushbu Parekh Spatial Manifesto Fig 6 Tithi Kholia Center for mental wellness_Plan

Fig 7 Devanshi Shah Mental Map Fig 8 Devanshi Shah Time Problem_ Axonometric Fig 9 Moksha Mehta Spatial Manifesto Fig 10 Tithi Kholia Part design plans, section & 3D

Faculty of Architecture AR3027 Monsoon 2021

Fig.3

Fig.4

108

108

108

Fig.5

Fig.6

109 109

109

Faculty of Architecture AR3027 Monsoon 2021

110

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig.7

Fig.8

110

110

Fig.9

Fig.10 111 111

111

AR3018

The City and Performance Spaces – Performance Spaces as Urban Catalysts

Unit Assistant Mohik Acharya

Faculty of Architecture AR3018 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year N Jatin Repalle Sajanish Aashvi Trivedi Aditi Shah Riddhi Doshi Abhilasha Chauhan

5 th Year Aditi Kanodia Ipsa Pancholi Preet Patel Priyanka Kolhe Ruchitkumar Patel Vatsal Sanghavi Yashi Tripathi

Jayant Gunjaria

Viral Bhavsar

All arts are essential expressions of human existence. Performance Arts in particular, have evolved as a primary manifestation of their respective cultures and subsequently have a profound impact on the functioning of these cultures.

The collective nature of performing arts renders them public, making it vital to understand the role of performing arts in socio-cultural development and built environments that actively generate the specific image and vision of the place and the city. A chronological examination of performance spaces reveals that they tend to occur progressively as technically advanced, closed isolated boxes through time, enabling one to create and conduct performances in the most imaginative manner.

In that respect, performance spaces are as important a tool for a good performance as a well-tuned instrument or an artist. While their typology requires performance spaces to be a closed box, they are also inherently public spaces. The challenge then is to be able to house this instrument along with public spaces in their respective contexts. This initiated inquiry into the nature of spaces, which generate and enable environments where performances can occur in a specific context and, in turn, into how performances and the spaces that host them influence their contexts.

112

112

112

Fig.1 113 113

113

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Aditi K Exploded view of performance space Fig 2 Riddhi, Aditi S, Jatin, Sajanish, Vatsal, Abhilasha, Ruchit Relationship between performance & public space Fig 3 Preet, Riddhi, Ruchit Site Analysis and Space Syntax Analysis of Dr. BR Ambedkar Hall, Saraspur, Ahmedabad

Faculty of Architecture AR3018 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2 114

Fig 4 Aditi S, Ruchit, Preet, Vatsal, Priyanka, Aditi K Sectional prespective of Individual contextual response Fig 5 Sajanish, Aashvi, Jatin, Riddhi Sectional Views of Individual contextual response

Fig.3 115

Architecture UG Level-3

Faculty of Architecture AR3018 Monsoon 2021

Fig.4

116

Fig.5 117 117

117

AR3035

New Vernacular Architecture

Unit Assistant Khushi Makwana

Faculty of Architecture AR3035 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Baidehi Rej Dhrumin Patel

5 th Year Abishek P Aryan Karena Charmi Patel Dhruv Patel Gyan Praharsh Kairav Trivedi Reya Kundu Ritwik Behuria Rutvik Faldu S L N Deekshit Takshil Jagani

Martin Anzellini

Harshil Parikh

Vernacular architecture is expressed as the original architecture: arché-techné . It was generated by all cultures, in all places and responded to the basic need of people to adapt to their own habitat. It is made with the available resources, to find shelter and to highlight the respective cultural representations.

It is ancient and contemporary, urban and rural, rustic and sophisticated, large and small. The understanding and application of the values of vernacular architecture offers solutions to the contemporary discipline for the construction of an appropriate and sustainable built environment. Six principles of vernacular architecture were presented as tools for the studio exercise: 1. The specific creation.

2. The organic (fractal) production.

3. The participation of the user in the creative process.

4. The progressive development (incremental).

5. The egoless design.

6. The building as a tool for the empirical transmission of knowledge.

The studio aimed to generate a new vernacular architecture (NVA) appropriate project. With this in mind, the semester was divided into three phases: 1.The analysis of vernacular architectures of the world 2.The identification of a real, necessary program in the Indian territory 3.The development of a NVA project.

118

118

118

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3 119 119

119

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Map locating vernacular architectures studied from different regions from around the world.

Fig 2, 3 Gyan Praharsh, Aryan Karena Global vernacular architecture analysis of the Yaodong pit dwellings from Territorial Asia and Kathkuni architecture from Himalayas.

Fig 4 Reya Kundu Vernacular analysis of yemen towers from the Middle East.

Fig 5 Kairav Trivedi Learnings from the vernacular analaysis of Machu Picchu.

Fig 6 Map locating the identified .problematics and necessary programatics for NVA project in India.

Faculty of Architecture AR3035 Monsoon 2021

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6 120

Fig 7,8 Kairav Trivedi Program development and ground plan and sections of Cattle care and community farm, Oda Chotta, Rajasthan.

Fig 9 Reya Kundu Sections of Work and stay block for labourers and market storage for the Living barn, Chandigarh.

Fig 10,11,12 Takshil Jagani Section through flood resilient community center showing a scenario during the floods, along with two views from the project near Porbandar, Gujarat.

Fig 13 Ritwik Behuria Axonometric, section and details from the Center for vocational training and commerce in Spiti Valley, Himachal Pradesh.

Fig.7

Fig.8

121

Architecture UG Level-3

Faculty of Architecture AR3035 Monsoon 2021

Fig.9

Fig.10

122

Fig.12

Fig.11

Fig.13 123 123

123

AR3011

Narratives in Architecture

Unit Assistant Priyanshi Jain

Faculty of Architecture AR3011 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Akshat Pagaria Krishna Patel Krunal Sadhu Nisarg Patel Nishtha Mehta Ritika Doijode Riya Kohli

5 th Year Aashee Ganjoo Jaya Khurana Prachi Bedia

Meghal Arya The increasingly complex and dynamic social, political and ecological constructs of the world offer opportunities to explore new meanings in public architecture. This act of re-imagining our public spaces can possibly be derived through a focus on experience using the structure of a fictional narrative. Storytelling has, historically, been a powerful tool to communicate and disseminate meanings and values. Art forms like theatre, cinema and now installations use storytelling as a central device in their process.

Architecture has always claimed to communicate meaning and yet, the idea of narratives in architecture remains limited to select theoretical expressions.

The aim of this studio was to engage with the idea of the narrative and seek interpretations for a new imagination of public spaces exploring new typologies and hybrid programs within the expressions of the built form. Students were expected to seek out issues of concern and define their project in terms of program, site and brief. Interpretations of intimate connections to the site, integrated with core concerns, were presented as storyboards, drawings, sketches and models.

124

124

124

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3 125 125

125

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig 1 Prachi Bedia Site Mapping at Vasna Gam Fig 2 Nishtha Mehta Site Mapping at Vasna Gam Fig 3 Riya Kohli Site Mapping at Sola Gam Fig 4 Jaya Khurana Experiential Sketches based on various emotions

Fig 5 Akshat Pagaria Sketches for the imagination of the proposed narrative Fig 6 Nishtha Mehta Crafting a Bridge: Within and Beyond Fig 7 Krishna Patel Diffusing edges: Social and economic restructuring of Makarba gam Fig 8 Jaya Khurana Emotions and Architecture: A journey to Wakefulness

Faculty of Architecture AR3011 Monsoon 2021

Fig.4

126

126

126

Fig.5

Fig.6 127 127

127

Faculty of Architecture AR3011 Monsoon 2021

128

Architecture UG Level-2

Fig.7

128

128

Fig.8 129 129

129

AR3033

Workplace Neighborhoods

Unit Assistant Bageshri Thakar

Faculty of Architecture AR3033 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Drashti Agrawal Namrita Mathew Radhika Bhakkar Samyuktha N P Shannon Maria

5 th Year Aakash Bala Saravanan Aditya Agarwal Aditya Setalvad Aesha Shah Harsh Prajapati Nishra Shah Sharvi Shah Sunny Tuvar

Nimit Killawala

Prateek Banerjee

The idea that work is bound to be anchored in a corporate office succumbed during the ongoing COVID crises, making us think about integrating workplace at a neighborhood scale. Unlike mono functional and generic office buildings located in CBD’s, the unit aimed at testing workplace typologies within civic environments, supported by community/civic institutions offering an ecosystem, wherein individuals can tap into networks of collaborations offered within their surroundings. Freelancers are no more isolated, small businesses have the flexibility to expand and shrink as required. The focus is to attract a young workforce within a rich urban environment, with enough to offer even after the traditional working hours.

The current knowledge economy only fosters collaborations such as bridging services, interdisciplinary research and the creative clusters. The unit speculated on the cross overs among such entities as potential drivers for change within cities. For the Monsoon-21 semester, the site had been identified in the western Suburb of Vile Parle in Mumbai. The designated plots sit along a water channel, skirting the northern periphery of Juhu Vile Parle Development Scheme (JVPD), a prominent residential neighborhood within suburban Mumbai.

130

130

130

131

131

Fig.1 Fig 1

131

131

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Group Work :Triple Helix collaboration involving Industry, Academia & Government to evolve a program Fig 2 Aditya Setalvad : Diagrammatic Exloration of case studies ( Blox, OMA ) Fig 3 Aditya Setalvad : Void as a tool to structure multiple stakeholders.

Fig 4 Nishra Shah : Promenade Spine

as an organiser of the built form Fig 5 Nishra Shah : Exploded floor plate, highlighting access points linked to vertical circulation.

Fig 6 Sharvi Shah : Hydroponics -performance of the built form along with landscape as a cohesive whole.

Fig 7 Sharvi Shah : Section addressing the street and promenade edge.

Faculty of Architecture AR3033 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2 132

132

Fig.3 133

133

Architecture UG Level-3

Faculty of Architecture AR3033 Monsoon 2021

Fig.4

Fig.5

134

Fig.6

Fig.7

135 135

135

AR3017

Realizing Nolli’s Dream: Embedding Architecture in the City

Unit Assistant Nilosha Dave

Faculty of Architecture AR3017 Monsoon 2021

5 th Year Anoushka Mittal Arya Dhanda Gajjar Marut Hamsika Gummadavelly Harshil Shah Ishita Sojitra Parikshit Kalavadia Pulak Goyal Sandra Palathingal Sawani Jain

Sachin Soni Nolli’s map of Rome holds unique significance for architects and urbanists these days. It presents dialectical relationships between buildings and their milieu. It counters a tendency to see buildings as isolated objects outside the very context that gives them life and meaning.

Inspired by Nolli’s map, this studio focused on developing a conceptual and critical approach to architectural design where buildings are not seen as ‘isolated events’ but are deeply and intrinsically embedded in the fabric of the city.

The studio aimed to reimagine typologies of civic/infrastructure projects which constitute a major part of urban development in Indian cities. Most of these projects do not respond to their immediate context due to conventional architectural approaches and end up becoming inaccessible parts of the city.

The objective of this studio was to architecturally reinterpret existing types of civic buildings/ infrastructure in cities, so that they are well integrated with immediate and broad urban context. Based on strong contextual awareness, the studio investigated and explored various programmatic strategies and architectural alternatives which make projects more accessible and public in character.

136

136

136

Fig.1 137 137

137

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 1 Sawani Jain Illustration representing vision of the project.

Fig 2 Arya Dhandha Diagrams representing spatial strategy.

Fig 3 Arya Dhandha Cut-away Axonometric view of final proposal.

Fig 4 Pulak Goyal Transverse section of proposal at Vastral Gam site Fig 5 Harshil Shah Transverse section of proposal at Vastral Gam site

Faculty of Architecture AR3017 Monsoon 2021

Fig.2

Fig.3 138

Fig 6 Hamsika Gummadavelly Transverse section of proposal at Gheekanta site Fig 7 Sandra Palathingal Transverse section of proposal at Gheekanta site Fig 8 Hamsika Gummadavelly Cut-away Axonometric view of final proposal Fig 9 Harshil Shah Cut-away Axonometric view of final proposal

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7 139

Architecture UG Level-3

Faculty of Architecture AR3017 Monsoon 2021

Fig.8

140

Fig.9 141 141

141

AR3034

Verticity: The Future is Here

Unit Assistant Ajay Chovatia

Faculty of Architecture AR3034 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Hetarth Mistry Raj Kansara Vagmi Shah

5 th Year Agrima Manglik Almitra R Anirudh Shankar Khushi Shah Jay Odharia Sandra George Varisha Chauhan

Vishwanath Kashikar It is 2025. ‘The Pandemic’ is forcing a big rethink.

The first tentative steps of restructuring society and reimagining relationships with other living entities are breaking ground. Sustainability advocates have already been demanding a change in the way we live. Architecture is not immune to this churning. The separation of home and workspace– a gift of industrialization is finally being seriously questioned.

You have been invited by a group of like-minded individuals to design a commune/habitat that will act as a beacon for the future of the urban environment. Due to the experimental and uncertain nature of the project, two iterations of the project are planned based on your interpretation of nature and society.

The studio commenced with a set of videos/ readings on predictions for the future of humans on earth. Simultaneously, we discussed the history of program based building types. The main design exercise equipped one to respond to changing context conditions using an iterative design method. Two iterations were proposed, followed by a recombining of the two to create the final proposal.

142

142

142

Fig.2

Fig.1

Fig.3 Fig 1 143 143

143

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig 01 Varisha Chauhan - Visualisation of atrium Fig 02 Varisha Chauhan - Facade articulation Fig 03 Varisha Chauhan - Visualisation of vertical farm Fig 04 Hetarth Mistry - Cross section Fig 05 Almitra R. - Comic strip : Society in future Fig 06 Almitra R - Cross section Fig 07 Vagmi Shah - Isometric of unit cluster

Faculty of Architecture AR3034 Monsoon 2021

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6 144

Fig 08 Agrima Manglik - Sectional elevation Fig 09 Sandra George - Sectional perspective Fig 10 Jay Odharia - Elevation Fig 11 Khushi Shah - Site plan Fig 12 Khushi Shah - Site section Fig 13 Raj Kansara - Building axonometric Fig 14 Anirudh Shankar - Plan Fig 15 Anirudh Shankar - Building axonometric

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9 145

Architecture UG Level-3

Fig.10 Faculty of Architecture AR3034 Monsoon 2021

Fig.11

Fig.12

146

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15 147 147

147

148

Dhruvi Gandhi AR3014, Contextualizing Interior Space Makin Prashant Pradhan, Bharat P

148

FACULTY OF DESIGN

149

149

BD2008

Expeditions in Digital Technologies

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Likhinya KVS

Faculty of Design BD2008 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Anirban Gupta Divyanshi Tulsian Kashvi Chopra Mayank Patole 3 rd Year Anushka Maheshwari Esha Gupta Hitesh Rao Mahima Singh Tejomay Kalai Vaishnavi Borkar

Jinal Shah The exploration and application of digital fabrication processes have opened new realms of possibilities for architectural expression. In recent times, these techniques have gained momentum to develop complex forms using different materials.

The course intended to explore the potential of Additive Manufacturing technology (3D printing) and computational tools to evolve a design process and innovative construction methods, and develop products/interior architecture elements within a defined context.

The course equipped the students with the skill of coding and of digital fabrication processes to design, develop, analyze, resolve and construct scaled prototypes of their element. The course was divided into three modules: Exploration, Application, and Making with each module focusing on developing different digital, analytical, and hands-on learning skills.

Module 1: Analyzing complex geometry, developing different interlocking systems using computational tools, and understanding the principles of additive manufacturing to construct.

Module 2: Understanding the site context, anthropometry, function, and developing different forms and interlocking systems for a defined product/interior architecture element.

Module 3: Resolving the details and making a prototype

150

150

150

Fig 1 151 151

151

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Kashvi Chopra 3d Models showing form Exploration and Kit of Parts for the 3d printed prototype Fig 2 Mayank Patole, Mahima Singh Form Exploration using Rhino and grasshopper Fig 3 Tejomay Uma 3d Printed prototype of Vornoi inspired table Fig 4 Divyanshi Tulsania Drawings and 1:1 scale prototype of chair with 3d printed Nodes

Fig 5 Esha Gupta From Development and Iterations of 3d Printed Catenary Structure Fig 6 Mayank Patole Drawings showing detials of 3d printed seating Fig 7 Tejomay Uma Drawings showing details of 3d printed Table Fig 8 Vaishnavi Borkar Assembly System and Details of 3d Printed Modules

Faculty of Design BD2008 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

152

152

152

Fig 4

Fig 5 153 153

153

Faculty of Design BD2008 Monsoon 2021

154

Design UG Level-2

Fig 6

Fig 7

154

154

Fig 8 155 155

155

BD2007

Beyond Mainstream Materials

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Likhinya KVS

Faculty of Design BD2007Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Dhruv Saxena Kavya Khattar

3 rd Year Archi Shah Avani Gupta Benett Thomas Dev Prajapati Harini Shah Kavina Shah Kushagra Mittal Nanditha Francis Pratika Chhajed

Rebecca Reubens Most mainstream design praxis centers on the trinity of wood, metal and plastic. Within the broad scope of these materials as well, there are very specific design choices that traditionally dovetail with mass-production and the industrial paradigm.

This studio explored alternatives to these mainstream and industrialized materials, with the aim of expanding the designer’s material and technique palette. Non-mainstream and nonindustrial materials such as natural fibers, shell, bamboo, terracotta and textiles are interesting materials that exist in our natural environment, but are not used extensively because they are not part of traditional industrial paradigm linked material palettes.

There are also several materials which are ‘waste’ or ‘surplus’ from mainstream industrial manufacturing; this studio also included these materials. We explored these materials as viable alternatives for contemporary interior elements including furniture, lighting and accessories. A series of hands-on material exploration allowed each student to develop a prototype which leveraged the understanding of new material possibilities.

156

156

156

157

157

Fig 1

157

157

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 All Students Final models designed by students Fig 2 All Students Mainstream material explorations in teakwood, pine wood, mdf, plywood, denim, mango wood, corrugated sheet, pvc pipes, mildstell & styrofoam Fig 3 All Students Non-Mainstream material explorations in solid bamboo, hollow bamboo, grey board, recycled

plastic, felt, paper mache, particle board, ceramics & rubber Fig 4 Dev. Prajapati Technical drawings of folding laptop table Fig 5 Avani. Gupta User study of CEPT stool - Mainstream Object Fig 6 Nanditha. Francis Ideation sketches for shoe rack Fig 7 All Students working on final models in non mainstream materials

Faculty of Design BD2007 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

158

158

158

1

3

2

5

4

(1) PLASTIC HOLDER A

6

7

8

LAMINATE FIXED WITH ADHESIVE

(2) TOP LAMINATE

A

(4) EDGE BANDING B

B

(3) 12MM MDF BOARD

C

C

(6) PLASTIC HINGE HINGE SCREWED TO MDF BOARD (9) M6 PHILIPS HEAD 14MM LONG SCREW

(9) M6 HOLLOW DOME RIVET

1

Item Qty 1

3

1

4

F

310

30

EDGE BANDING

1

BOTTOM LAMINATE

4

PLASTIC HINGE

150

1:5

SCALE MATERIAL

MDF, MS, FOAM

FINISH

7

2

16MM MS PIPE LEGS

4

FOAM PIECES

FASTENERS

9

16

M6 PHILIPS HEAD 14MM LONG SCREW

10

4

M6 HOLLOW DOME RIVET

3

NAME

RIVETS, SCREWS

FOLDING TABLE Ø8 DRAWING EXPLODED Ø6

13/09/21

DATE

DATE

DEV PRAJAPATI

BD2007 BEYOND MAINSTREAM MATERIALS

CHK'D APPV'D

ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM 5

4

DRAWING TITLE

4

DRAWING NO

DRAWN

8

2

160

LAMINATED, PAINTED

WEIGHT

1

290

F

260

B

TOP LAMINATE

20 42 12 MM MDF BOARD

8

E

600

130

6

7

PLASTIC HOLDER

1

A

5

6

B

Part Number

1

2

5

4

14

1

3

(8) FOAM PIECES

35

A

(7) Ø16MM PIPE LEGS

2 Parts List

260

E

D

(5) BOTTOM LAMINATE

5

D

6

7

8

R450

80

50

40

250

20 40

B

330

C

400 5

4

6

1

7

8

50

B -B (1:5) 255

30

3

2

5

250

50

1

A

0

40

A

1

14

R6

0

R4

B

310

12

14

275

305

C

3

°

16

16 35

6 3 4

1

Ø3

C

C

13

30

5

0

0 R1

20 40

6

0 300 R6

C

6

A

7

8

6 Ø

2

85 5

B

B

E E C

7

1:1

807

6 5

45

255

50 R

C

7

6

Fig 4 C

8 7

D

D

F

8

1595

19

4

C

D

40

1:1

300

D

290

Ø3 SCALE DRAWING TITLE DRAWING NO FOLDING TABLE DRAWING TITLE SCALE ABS MATERIAL DRAWING NO (8) PLASTIC HINGE FOLDING TABLE ABS MATERIAL 61 DATE 19 PLASTIC13/09/21 HINGE MATT DATE (8) FINISH NAME R5 MATT DATE FINISH NAME DATE 13/09/21 DRAWN DEV PRAJAPATI WEIGHT 80 BD2007 BEYOND MAINSTREAM MATERIALS WEIGHT BD2007 BEYOND MAINSTREAM MATERIALS F SCREWS CHK'DDRAWN DEV PRAJAPATI FASTENERS D SCREWS CHK'D FASTENERS APPV'D ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM APPV'D ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM

4 3

Ø6

0x

B 3 2

5

600

10

R1 x2

Ø8

60

8

B

C

Ø8

2

°

R5

2 1

28

19 Ø8

120

12 4 4 12 4 20.28 20.28

R6

10

R1 x2

14

10

10

50

F

10

40

7

10

A

B

35 14 30

6 30 3

35

30

12

10

120

C-C (1:1) C-C (1:1)

F

40

5

5°

8

6

80

D

40

10

C

12/09

DATE

BD2007 BEYOND MAINSTREAM MAT

CHK'D

480 Ø6 4 HOLE FOR FITTING ON MDFFOR Ø6 HOLE FITTING ON MDF

3

DRAWING TITLEA

FOLDING TABLE

APPV'D

5

80

DATE

DEV PRAJAPATI

A

60

5

5

5°

10

30

260

5

10

5

12 5

E

35

40 30

R5

7

° 90

40 30

10

SCREWS, RIVETS

260

60

5

R5

B

160

NAME DRAWN

FASTENERS

35 25 4

1

DRAWING NO

LAMINATED

ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM B

2

60

C

5

10

MDF, Al, FOAM

A

FINISH

6

160

400

D

E

25

1:5

600

A

19

60

MATERIAL

60 1

Ø3

B-B (1:1) B-B (1:1)

130

D

C

25

25

35

14

25

8

SCALE

8

R1

Ø3

290

8 2

10

16

R1

600

7 13/09/21

7

2

5

150

30

35

C

3530

C

30

60

WEIGHT

3

B R1

5

5

R1

5

R47 0x

160

8

FOLDING TABLE (7) PIPE LEGS

290

R1

400

6

5

602

B

28

310 R1

B

1

50

12.5

6

30

4

12.5

B

20

B

B

14

5

6

3

B

B

DRAWING TITLE7

DATE

BD2007 BEYOND MAINSTREAM MATERIALS

F

35

64

Ø

DATE

DEV PRAJAPATI

CHK'D APPV'D

ALL DIMENSIONS IN MM

X4

8

6 NAME

DRAWN

22

37 56 19.9965 Ø 19.9965 3

X4

6

0

DRAWING NO

MS

RIVETS

15

40

2

R2

5

6

5 35

F

6

1:2 PAINTED

FASTENERS

305

0

1

1840

5

FINISH WEIGHT

50

R2

3760

5

MATERIAL

255

5

18

14

A

SCALE

4

250

60

6

290 460

E

5

A

4 3

5

F

40

3

2

30

2 1

A

5

150 70

16

1

4

Ø8

E

159

2

E

D

40

1

R2

R5 16

20 40

A (1:1)

D

X2

x6

1

C

400

R450

1

D

250

2

B

30 50

40

MATERIAL

R40

FINISH F

0

1595

40

E

E

SCALE

1:1 FOAM

FASTENERS

NAME

MATT DRAWN

WEIGHT RIVETS

9

DRAWING NO

CHK'D

DEV PRAJAPATI

DATE

DRAWING TITLE

FOLDING TABLE (8) FOAM PIECE

DATE

E

13/09/21

BD2007 BEYOND MAINSTREAM MATERIALS

F

5 159

50

E

BEYOND MAINSTREEM MATERIALS

Design UG Level-2

OBSERVATION | BODY POSTURES WHILE SITTING ON THE

Faculty of Design BD2007 Monsoon 2021

LEG RESTS POSITON

Fig 5 REBECCA REUBENS

TA- LIKHINYA KVS

AVANI GUPTA [ UG190246 ]

DATE - 27/09/22

Fig 6

160

160

160

Fig 7 161 161

161

BD2001

Expeditions in Metal

Focus Visualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Shagun Malavia

Faculty of Design BD2001Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Adithyan Kumar Anjali Girish Aryaa Bhagwat Jay Murthy Nuzha Shafi

3 rd year Abishai Choragudi Harshavi Patel Kushani Mehta Mital Shiyani

Sadasivan Iyer

Rudrapal Sinh Solanki

The design of products to meet the demands of built spaces are challenging. The products have to face the challenges of lifestyle and technology changes. The studio introduced the design process aimed at finding solutions in different domains of work, home and other spaces .

The modules in the studio enhanced the learning of materials (metals), manufacturing processes, and human factors. The design process was introduced and practiced as students applied learned fundamental principles to multiple three dimensional forms, structures, and products.

Students used extensive digital and physical model making and presentation software in the initial stages (2D and 3D). Students addressed the historical context of their designs as they practiced critical thinking, research, problem solving, and aesthetic refinement. Projects required sketches, models, written reports and verbal presentations of design concepts.

Students were required to present their individual creative process through the exploration and manipulation of materials and methods to express a visual response to a theme or content.

Digital media examples exposed them to a variety of materials and methods as means to stimulate curiosity, exploration, invention and solution finding, and to develop an aesthetic eye and personal vision.

162

162

162

Fig 1 163 163

163

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Jay Murthy Group installation , joinery detailing by him.

Fig 2 Kushani Mehta Shelving system Mock up for Workshop Fig 3 Nuzha Shafi Corner shelf for washroom Fig 4 Aryaa Bhagwat Shelf for an indoor space Fig 5 Harshavi Patel Metal Joinery 1 : 1

scale explorations Fig 6 Abishai Choragudi Metal Joinery 1 : 1 scale explorations Fig 7 Anjali Girish Paper sheet roll & sketch book keeper Fig 8 Mital Shiyani Stationary & accessory organizer Fig 9 Adithyan Kumar Aluminium based shelf & organizer

Faculty of Design BD2001 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

164

164

164

Fig 3

Fig 4 165 165

165

Faculty of Design BD2001 Monsoon 2021

166

Design UG Level-2

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

166

166

Fig 8

Fig 9 167 167

167

IR2027

Remodelling Residences

Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Fateh Singh Bhatia

Faculty of Design IR2027 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Ansh Ajmera Gayatri Arkal Hamsa Gajjala Margi Sutariya

3rd Year Anaya Ambalal Devansh Singla Ela Kulkarni Mallika Sharma Sarvagnya Thirunagari Shreyansh Nakrani

Hamid Raj ‘Remodelling residences’; the focus of this studio was space planning and organization. The students were required to: understand the users and stakeholders; respond to an actual site and its context; to respond to climate; and identify and choose an appropriate structural system. We studied prototypical ‘Pol houses’ to understand and appreciate the traditional vernacular house and utilize and incorporate its wisdom in the new design. The task was to design a residence for a family including five people. The site was located in the pol of the old city of Ahmedabad; the site was a pol house in a completely dilapidated and broken state; some elements such as windows, doors, wooden columns, beams, joists, staircase etc. were salvaged. These salvaged elements are supposed to be reused in the new design.

Students designed a residence for a family in the given site keeping in mind the individual needs of the family members while responding to the site context and the climatic conditions. The students had to make an overall design which reused the salvaged elements from the old structure, and they proposed a structural system and planned the interior spaces along with furniture layouts.

168

168

168

Fig 1 169 169

169

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1. Group Work Ansh Ajmera, Gayatri Arkal Decoding Vernacular Elements Fig 2 Hamsa Gajjala North Elevation Fig 3 Ela Udayan Section

Fig 4 Ela Udayan Ground Floor Plan Fig 7 Margi Sutaria East Elevation Fig 8 Margi Sutaria Ground Floor Plan

Faculty of Design IR2027 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

170

170

170

Fig 3

Fig 4 171 171

171

Faculty of Design IR2027 Monsoon 2021

172

Design UG Level-2

Fig 5

Fig 5

172

172

Fig 6

Fig 7 173 173

173

IR2041

Design Geometry in Tiny Spaces FunctionDesign - Transformability Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Yashshree Karandikar

Faculty of Design IR2041Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Khushali Baldaniya Aakansha Desai Vedanti Juvekar

3 rd Year Dhruvanshi Modhwadia Dhwani Sanklecha Miti Shah Riddhi Pandya Sachi Prajapati Samridhi Jha Zalak Shah

Gouthama D M Perhaps the most famous exercise in tiny space design is the Le Corbusier-designed 16 sq.m.Cabanon in which the Swiss architect explored the ‘Modular’– an understanding of the fundamentality of human scale. Today, the tiny spaces movement appears at the intersection of our changed outlook on materialism, ecoconsciousness and affordability.

Tiny spaces can exhibit multiplicity in usage in camper vans, mobile homes, traditional singlefamily residences, calamity relief structures and quarantine shelters during pandemics.

Whether promoting minimalist lifestyle or providing exclusive weekend rental spaces in the countryside in harmony with nature, tiny spaces offer a range of benefits. With the decreasing floor area in the urban scenario, optimization of interior spaces is extremely relevant.

The studio dealt with the design challenge of planning and detailing the interiors of tiny spaces, with a size less than 400 sq. ft. Students had to conceptualize the multiplicity of uses for the given brief and site, and arrive at interior space planning design. Students, thus, worked on TINY residential units. Creative transformation of spaces and designing efficiency were focused upon.

174

174

174

Fig 1 175 175

175

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Miti Shah. Isometric view of facade and interior Tiny Space.

Fig 2 Zalak Shah. Section showing different levels in the space.

Fig 3 Zalak Shah. 3D view of interior space showing play of light through the facade.

Fig 4&5 Dhruwanshi Modi. Plan at different levels.

Fig 6 Dhruwanshi Modi. Section through the spaces showing different level and spaces

Fig 8 9 Dhwani Sancklecha. Plans of different level showing transformable spaces.

Fig 10 Dhwani Sancklecha. Interior view of the space of the plan above.

Fig 11 Khushali Baldaniya. Model showing transformation in furniture designed by the student.

Fig 12&13 Aakansha Desai Transformable furniture designed by the student for the proposed space.

Faculty of Design IR2041 Monsoon 2021

Section Fig 2

Interior view

Fig 3

176

176

176

Plan - Level 1

Fig 4

Plan - Level 2

Fig 5

Fig 6 177 177

177

Design UG Level-2

Plan - Level 1 Faculty of Design IR2041 Monsoon 2021

Fig 9

Plan - Level 2 Fig 10

Interior View

178

178

178

Transformation of furniture - multifunctional table

Fig 11 Transformation of furniture - shelf to table

Fig 12

Transformation of furniture - table combined with chair

Fig 13 179 179

179

IR2032

Decoding The Poetics of Spaces

Focus Visualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Shailja Patel

Faculty of Design IR2032Monsoon 2021

2nd year Foram Panchal Isha Hapani Shreeya Suhag Vishwa Savalia

3rd year Bhavana Bhamidipati Devni Haria Kavisha Gajjar Raashi Deshmukh Rhia Ahuja Shah Shrutuja Shil Shikha Pokharna Vallari Pathak Yashasvi Patel

Jagrut Raval

Koral Adenwala

As designers, artists, and creative individuals we are poets at heart. How can we design without romanticizing about space? The fact is that poetry does not exist in the books in the library.

Poetry is in the journey of reading the book.

You change as a person in that journey. Poetry is the encounter of the reader with the book, the discovery of the book. For the monsoon semester of 2021 made the book Poetics of Space by Gaston Bachelard as our North Star.

Various exercises in the semester responded to the 10 chapters of the book. Each chapter of the book was read-reread-analyzed-torn apart-critiqued during each week. The text provided visual genesis for the design exercises throughout the semester. Students and faculty conducted periodic readings together to interpret and understand various meanings of the text. Students were given specific exercises to broaden their repertoire of elements of space which helped them to build and construct spaces. All exercises were done keeping the text of the book in mind. The Poetics of Space by Gaston Bachelard places special emphasis on the interior domestic space and its components: the various rooms and the different types of furniture in it. The studio was informed by this emphasis.

180

180

180

Fig 1 181 181

181

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Vallari Pathak Significance of Hut Fig 2 Shrutuja Shah Significance of Hut Fig 3 Vallari Pathak Anthology of Elements Fig 4 Vishwa Savalia Anthology of Elements Fig 5 Rhia Ahuja Chasing Oneiric Feeling

Fig 6 Shrutuja Shah Animal Architecture Fig 7 Vishwa Savalia Animal Architecture Fig 8 Rhia Ahuja Animal Architecture Fig 9 Vallari Pathak Animal Architecture Fig 10 Kavisha Gajjar Graphic Novel Fig 11 Shrutuja Shah Graphic Novel

Faculty of Design IR2032 Monsoon 2020

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

182

182

182

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9 183 183

183

Faculty of Design IR2032 Monsoon 2021

184

Design UG Level-2

Fig 10

184

184

Fig 11 185 185

185

IR2022

Reimagining The Vernacular

Focus Visualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Kamna Vyas

Faculty of Design IR2022 Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Anshika Bhatt Hridi Shah Mridushi Singhal Sanjana Mahadevan Viditi Jain Vishwa Hindocha Vrushali Kamdar

3 rd year Karnavi Jadeja Hardee Agrawal Srushti Mehta

Jay Thakkar Vernacular can be stated as ‘for the people, by the people’. In this studio, the context of vernacular was textile crafts and local cultural practices across Gujarat. This studio unit intended to involve the students with various textile-based craft practices, designers and organizations across India and Europe to expand their understanding of the subject. Through the process of craft-design collaboration, the larger purpose was to create interactive educational games and graphic novels based on the narratives of these practices, in-depth research and field visits. These interactive materials were generated through the amalgamation of interdisciplinary fields like game design, graphic design, storytelling, and textile and narrative crafts.

This unit was part of a four-year-long project: Threads of Innovation (TOI), an international academic collaboration between the Faculty of Design, CEPT University and the Department of Architecture and Technology NTNU, Norway spearheaded by project coordinator Jay Thakkar.

The unit drew references from the research conducted over the years by the tutor and his research team at Design Innovation and Craft Resource Centre (DICRC). As part of this project, 5 students were elected to go to Norway during the SWS program

186

186

186

Fig 1 187 187

187

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Fig 1 Sanjana Mahadevan Adorning Identities Fig 2 Srushti Mehta Encounter with waves Fig 3 Mridushi Singhal Bhumika Fig 4 Sanjana Mahadevan Narrative map Craft Cards Fig 5 Mridushi, Srushti, Sanjana, Vrushali Story Book Fig 6 Karnavi Jadeja Crafting my Journey Fig 7 Sanjana Mahadevan Board Game Ajrakhpur

Fig 8 Viditi Jain, Vishwa Hindocha Board Game - Bandhan, Bandhej Fig 9 Vrushali Kamdar, Hardee Agrawal Board Game Jodan, Shilpkar Fig 10 Mridushi Singhal,Anshik Yaan ni Yatra, Azurakh Fig 11 Karnavi Jadeja, Hridi Shah Board Game - Bindu, Adorn Fig 12 Srushti Mehta Board Game Design - Sangam

Faculty of Design IR2022 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

188

188

188

Fig 5

Fig 6 189 189

189

Faculty of Design IR2022 Monsoon 2021

190

Design UG Level-2

Fig 7

Fig 8

190

Fig 9

190

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12 191 191

191

IR2033

Not A Child’s Play

Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Richa Patel

Faculty of Design IR2033Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Darshi Shah Hepi Shah Isha Patel Rishitha Tayyuru Tashu Dantani Zeel Patel

3 rd year Aeshna Khandwala Archana Marwaha Ishva Kalolia Maitreyi Popat Nandani Motiyani Sakshi Maheshwari Vaidehi Chikhalia

Priya Narayanan

Ananya Parikh

Spaces for children often follow a set of stereotypes dictated not by what children want or like but rather by an adult’s perception of a child’s needs based on the latter’s own biases and insecurities. The focus of this studio was to negotiate and strike a balance between a child’s and adult’s vision for a built space in the context of a Primary School. Learning being the central activity in schools, this studio dealt with developing a Spatial Pedagogy to facilitate learning while placing the spotlight on the needs of children. Students researched existing educational pedagogies, questioned them & developed their unique pedagogies based on which the design for the school was developed.

An added dimension was to explore the idea of primary school design in two different site contexts: rural & urban.

While the key question investigated through the studio was ‘what do children want with respect to the spaces they occupy?’ students also delved into other aspects such as are children in urban centres different from those in rural centres?’ and ‘what role does a school play in an urban community v/s rural community?’ A key component of the studio was to create a Child Anthropometry data bank and use the same to arrive at spatial and elemental dimensions in the overall design of the school.

192

192

192

2

LVL +0.1

1

LVL +0.60

LVL 0.0

LVL +0.60

3

2

4

2

5

LVL 0.0

9

4

2

LVL +0.15

8

LVL +0.60

1 6

LVL +0.60 7

N LVL 0.0

Urban school plan Fig.1.

2

LVL +0.60

3

9

2 2

LVL +0.15

8

1

4

LVL +0.60

LVL 0.0

LVL 0.0 5 2 LVL +0.60

3

4

2

4

LVL +0.60

6 LVL 0.0

7

5

4

LVL +0.60

6

N

7

N

Rural school plan Fig.2.

193 193

193

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Tashu Datani Overall Plan Fig 2 Tashu Patel Overall Plan Fig 3 Zeel Patel Poster Fig 4 Nandani Motwani Poster Fig 5 Tashu Datani Concept model Fig. 6 Vaidehi Patel Concept model Fig. 7 Aeshna Khandwala Concept model Fig.8 Isha Patel Precedent study Fig.9 Nandani Motwani Classroom plan and isometric

Fig.10 Tashu Datani Classroom plan and isometric Fig.11 Isha Patel Adjacency diagram, shape grammer explorations and overall form developement.

Fig.12 Isha Patel Design drawings Classroom Fig.13 Isha Patel Design Drawings -Overall School Building

Faculty of Design IR2033 Monsoon 2021

Fig.3.

Fig.5.

Fig.4.

Fig.6.

Fig.7.

194

194

194

Fig.8.

Fig.9.

Fig.10.

195 195

195

5m

1/7

NO.

FACULTY NAME : SHEET

1/7

SHEET

TEACHING ASSOCIATE : NO.

CLASSROOM PLAN

3

D 1

SCALE

5m

NOT A CHILD’S PLAY 0

IR2033: 3

F

F

ISHA PATEL STUDENT NAME :

DATE :

1:20 SCAL E:

8/11

01 December2021

NO. OF SHEETS :

TRINAL PRIMARY SCHOOL, Nehru Nagar cross road, Bimanagar, Ahmedabad PROJECT : CLASSROOM PLAN AND SECTION

DRAWING TITLE : FACULTY OF DESIGN,

NO.

E

1/7

SHEET

1

SCALE

0

E

NO.

5m

1/7

SHEET

NO.

NO.

UNIVERSITY NAME :

3

1/7

TEACHING ASSOCIATE :

5m

1

SCALE

0

SHEET

1/7 SHEET

RICHA PATEL

3

NO.

5m

NO.

5m

1/7

CEPT UNIVERSITY

1

SCALE

0

SHEET

1/7 SHEET

3

5m

3

5m

1

SCALE

1

SCALE

0

0

PRIYA NARAYANAN ANANYA PARIKH

3

3

FACULTY NAME :

16/10/2021

1

SCALE

1

SCALE

0

N 0

NOT A CHILD’S PLAY

DATE MM

1000 MM

16/10/2021

PLAN AT 1000

DATE PLAN AT

1000 MM

16/10/2021

1000 MM

IR2033:

DATE -

1000 MM

16/10/2021

16/10/2021

PLAN AT

DATE -

PLAN AT

DATE -

1000 MM

16/10/2021

PLAN AT

DATE PLAN AT

1000 MM

16/10/2021

1000 MM

16/10/2021

DATE -

PLAN AT

D

CHILD'S PLAY

- Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa

NOT A

Faculty

UIR20058

UIR20058

Isha Patel

UIR20058

Isha Patel

Isha Patel

UIR20058

UIR20058

UIR20058

Isha Patel

Isha Patel

Isha Patel

PLAY

DATE -

PLAN AT

CLASSROOM SECTIONS

SECTION DD

TA

CHILD'S PLAY

CHILD'S PLAY

- Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa

NOT A

Faculty TA

- Priya Narayan

NOT A CHILD'S PLAY

Faculty

Parikh CHILDTA'S - Ananya Richa PLAY

CHILD'S PLAY

CHILD'S - Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa

UIR20058

UIR20058

Isha Patel

Isha Patel

PRIYA NARAYANAN ANANYA PARIKH

NOT A

Faculty - Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa

TA

NOT A

Faculty - Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa - Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa

NOT A

Faculty

TA

TA

NOT A

Faculty

TA

PLAY

SECTION EE

N N

N

Faculty of Design IR2033 Monsoon 2021 CHILD'S - Priya Narayan Ananya Parikh - Richa

NOT A

Faculty

196

Design UG Level-2

Fig.11.

TA

SECTION EE

SECTION FF

CLASSROOM SECTIONS

SECTION DD

FACULTY OF DESIGN,

DRAWING TITLE :

Fig.12.

SECTION DD

SECTION EE

N N

N

N

CEPT UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY NAME :

FACULTY OF DESIGN, RICHA PATEL

DRAWING TITLE :

TRINAL PRIMARY SCHOOL, Nehru Nagar cross road, Bimanagar, Ahmedabad PROJECT :

NO. OF SHEETS :

DATE :

9/11

01 December2021

STUDENT NAME :

ISHA PATEL

SCAL E:

1:20

IR2033:

NOT A CHILD’S PLAY

FACULTY NAME :

PRIYA NARAYANAN ANANYA PARIKH

CEPT UNIVERSITY

TEACHING ASSOCIATE :

UNIVERSITY NAME :

RICHA PATEL

PROJECT :

SECTION FF

TRINAL PRIMARY SCHOOL, Nehru Nagar cross road, Bimanagar, Ahmedabad

196

196

9 2

LVL +0.15

8

1 LVL +0.60

IR2033:

NOT A CHILD’S PLAY FACULTY NAME :

C

PRIYA NARAYANAN ANANYA PARIKH

LVL 0.0

TEACHING ASSOCIATE :

2.

RICHA PATEL

3.

2

1.

LVL +0.60

UNIVERSITY NAME :

4.

CEPT UNIVERSITY

5.

FACULTY OF DESIGN,

3

6.

DRAWING TITLE :

2

12.

LVL + 300MM 5.

PLAN AT 1500 MM 4

7.

LVL + 300MM 10.

PROJECT :

8.

TRINAL PRIMARY SCHOOL, Nehru Nagar cross road, Bimanagar, Ahmedabad

LVL + 150MM

LVL 0.0

LVL + 300MM 6.

5

UP

4

UP

UP

UP

9.

LVL +0.60

B

UP

6

11.

LVL + 150MM

LVL + 300MM

7

10.

9.

N

GF plan

1. Watchman’s Cabin 2. Admin + Teacher + Principal room 3. Cooking Space 4. Eating Space 5. Girl’s Toilet 6. Boy’s Toilet 7. Classroom 8. Classroom 9. Playing Space 10. Playing Space 11. Playground 12. Reading Space

LVL + 150MM

NO. OF SHEETS :

2/11

DATE : SECTION AA

01 December2021

Section -AA

STUDENT NAME :

A

ISHA PATEL

11.

SCAL E:

1:100

SECTION BB

Section -BB

C

Fig.13.

SECTION CC

Section -CC 197 197

197

IR2040

Simply Fold: From Flat Surface to Kinetic Surfaces Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Vibhuti Shah

Faculty of Design IR2040Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Chinmayi Raghavendra Jainam Shah Riddhi Vijay Shruja K Patel Ved Vyas Vidhi J Bhimani

3 rd Year Dhrumil Suthar Shraddha Mojidra Utsav Zala

Shailesh Manke The aim of the studio was to use orthographic and isometric grid to develop 3D surfaces with Origamic Architecture (also referred to as Kirigami, Pop-up, Ullagami) as the main tool from a flat sheet of paper, acrylic or metal. Origamic architecture (OA) involves the three-dimensional reproduction of architecture, geometric patterns, everyday objects, or other images, on various scales, using cut-out and folded paper, usually thin paperboard.

The basic premise was to use a small card size medium to visualize and develop 3D surfaces to be transformed into kinetic surfaces for spaces.

The 3D surfaces can be interpreted as space making elements like light fixtures, furniture and kinetic surfaces for vertical and horizontal planes.

The idea behind this studio was to work with folded models in various materials to arrive at solutions. The semester primarily had a hands-on approach.

Use of technology wherever required was appropriated to the primary aim Works of pioneers like Mashahiro Chatani, Ingrid Silakus and Paul Jackson beca are the reference from where the explorations of this subject were carried forward

198

198

198

199

199

Fig 1

199

199

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Dhrumil Suthar Inspire and CreateInspired by “Rondding Histair 2” by Ingrid Siliakus Fig 2 Riddhi Vijay Technical drawingsStudy cum Relaxing Chair Fig 3 Vidhi Bhimani, Shruja Patel Pop-up Story Book Templates

Fig 4 Shraddha Tejas Mojidra, Folding Mechanism Table Product Models Fig 5 Dhrumil, Riddhi, Vidhi Popup Chair Study of Post Modern Designers Fig 6 Vidhi Bhimani Technical drawings of Interior Products designed by one folding mechanism

Faculty of Design IR2040 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2 200

200

Fig 3 201 201

201

Faculty of Design IR2040 Monsoon 2021

202

Design UG Level-2

Fig 4

Fig 5

202

202

Fig 6 203 203

203

IR2029

Traveler’s Home

Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Shivangi Panchal

Faculty of Design IR2029Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Aarunima Singh Kashvi Shah

3 rd Year Aayush Doshi Ananya Manojkumar Arpita Sharma Diya Mehta Harsh Zala Heer Desai Kamakshi Jadav Nishi Jagad

Shikha Parmar The focus of this unit was to design a shelter for a group of travel enthusiasts, embedded into the elaborate landscape of dissecting valleys, memory and sensation of Sigiriya, Sri Lanka.

One had to rethink the idea of ‘shelter’ to diversify interior experiences of daily activities. The process attempted to derive both pragmatic and more importantly a sensorial experience distilling the characteristics of a tropical region for an appropriate spatial narrative and selected user group. Contextual elements and the need of the user, informed the use of spatial elements and configuration of spaces were explored through models. As part of the pedagogic method, a tool box was derived with relevant materials and systems.

The studio attempted to conceptualize and evolve the grammar of interior spaces manifested through the nature of materials while integrating order of activities. Major milestones of this process were conceptualization, planning organization and spatial integrity. The students were encouraged to vividly communicate the central idea of the proposal through relevant presentation techniques that add profound inspiration to traveler’s explorations during their stay.

204

204

204

Fig 1 205 205

205

Faculty of Design IR2029 Monsoon 2021

370

870 100

400

Fig 7 Heer Desai Sectional perspective representing role of arcade.

Fig 8 Kamakshi Jadav Sectional views representing unfolding of interior spaces.

Fig 9 Kashvi Shah Views indicating the use of skin to define or blur boundaries.

Fig 10 Aayush Doshi Illustration highlighting the meandering path leading to private quarter.

760

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Harsh Zala Illustration depicting spatial integrity.

Fig 2 Group Work Exploring and recording activities vs space.

Fig 3 Group Work Abstract models expressing intangible qualities.

Fig 4 Ananya Manojkumar Spatial configuration allowing multiplicity.

Fig 5 Harsh, Nishi Diagrams showing path-space relationship.

Fig 6 Nishi Jagad Spatial order of spaces emphasizing courtyard.

608 6651

046

067

526 531

Fig 2

Fig 3

206

206

206

Fig 4 207 207

207

Faculty of Design IR2029 Monsoon 2021

208

Design UG Level-2

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

208

208

YSIZE XSIZE

afafD

f

D

f

af af

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10 209 209

209

IR2038

Hybrid Work(place)-From Objects Through Mediums Focus Visualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Shail Sheth

Faculty of Design IR2038Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Janvi Bhatia Rudvi Kumar Shria Thakkar

3rd Year Akshat Shah Anushka Shah Aryan Keswani Bhowmi Patel Dhruvi Thanawala Heer Sanghvi Khushi Panchal Kshanika Patel Mitta Kasturi Rudram Patel

Subin Jameel

Drishti Korat

A boundary does not define the interior; it is the order, array and number of objects which reside within a space that truly define the character of the interior. The studio aimed to develop an inside-out approach towards spatial design by questioning the ‘part to whole’ relationships between objects, structure, envelope, and site.

The studio aimed to disrupt our conventional relationship with architectural compositions and rethink the correlations between familiar objects, materials and it’s assemblies. How can this renewed understanding of objects give rise to unconventional kinships and hybridities in the form and performance of our spaces? The studio explored speculative design procedures by understanding the potential embedded in digital and analog mediums. Cycles of making and thinking with these mediums played an important role in the development of individual projects. The students also researched the history of the workspace and its evolution towards the contemporary place of work. This manifested into the proposal for a place of work and the audience it engenders, through the adaptive reuse of a warehouse in Ahmedabad.

The studio helped students develop a critical attitude towards questions surrounding interiority and effectively communicate their design ideas. It equipped them to develop cohesive translations from conceptual ideas into a working proposal through speculative drawings, representations, and models.

210

210

210

Fig 1 211 211

211

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Heer Sanghavi Exploded axonometric view showing the exisitng structure, built stucture and ramp.

Fig 2 Snippets from class work Hybrid Objects Fig 3 Rudram Patel Hybrid space: Furniture as space Fig 4 Rudvi Kumar Dynamic fluid walls juxtaposed with rocky terrain like surface.

Fig 5 Kasturi Mitta Continuous elements define multiple forms, from facade to furniture.

Fig 6 Akshat Shah Quilted spaces Fig 7 Akshat Shah Traditional embroidery as a surface articulation technique.

Fig 8 Aryan Keswani Digital art exhibition space Fig 9 Aryan Keswani VR space blurring the boundaries between a surface and a screen; physical and virtual.

Fig 10 Janvi Bhatia Creative workspace borrowing qualities from dollhouse typologies.

Faculty of Design IR2038 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

212

212

212

Fig 4

Fig 5 213 213

213

Faculty of Design IR2038 Monsoon 2021

214

Design UG Level-2

Fig 6

Fig 7

214

214

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10 215 215

215

IR2018

Art of Detailing: Elements and Structure

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Mayuri Ramavat

Faculty of Design IR2018 Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Divija Sharma

3 rd year Anvi Vijh Arthav Vagadiya Diya Chhaniyara Helly Patel Madhav Agrawal Mudit Mantri Nirja Gajjar Pranjal Patel Ruchi Bhardwaj Silvi Shah Yanshie Shah Zeeyan Modasiya

Vasav Bhatt

Ajay Patel

The idea of an architectural form, function and quality of space is continually changing but the fundamentals of structures remain unchanged.

The good structural systems are organizations of responsible components sharing respective duties within the whole and forming strong connections with each other.

Through this studio, students developed a critical understanding about material properties, structural elements and systems. As detailing is the articulation of the structure and construction, it became the core of the studio. The patterns were arranged in three main groups: Function, Constructability, and Aesthetics, corresponding to the three major concerns of the student. In guiding a design from idea to reality, architects design a set of details that show how structure will be put together.

The aesthetics are only a small fraction of good design and stability and functionality require a deep understanding of how elements come together. This studio helped bring the elements together with a well fleshed-out design that communicated accurately at all levels of the construction process.

216

216

216

Fig 1 217 217

217

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Madhav Agarwal Combination of Design and detail drawings Fig 2 Divija Sharma staircase details Fig 3 Divija Sharma staircase details Fig 4 Pranjal Patel Brick wall and arch detail Fig 5 Arthav Vagadiya Staircase design Fig 6 Arthav Vagaidiya Staircase detail and prototype

Fig 7 Silvi Shah Window design process and detail Fig 8 Silvi Shah Window design detail drawings Fig 9 Silvi Shah Window design detail prototypes Fig 10 Anvi Vijh Staircase and window detail prototypes

Faculty of Design IR2018 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

218

218

218

Fig 5

Fig 6 219 219

219

Faculty of Design IR2018 Monsoon 2021

220

Design UG Level-2

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

220

220

Fig 9

Fig 10 221 221

221

IR2024

Exploration of Design: Material in focus

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Harsheen Mengar

Faculty of Design IR2024 Monsoon 2021

3 rd year Arya Dave Ashesha Shah Fiza Elat Isha Patel Konkona Das Lakshita Grade Ojasva Raturi Rutvi Patel Sakshi Shah Saumya Trivedi Yug Shah Tejaswini Nettem Yashvee Sheth

Vishal Joshi

Ramesh Patel

The studio required students to produce drawings for design problems considering their learning from relevant exercises conducted during the semester tenure. The process required students to: 1. Study various determining properties of a construction material and in response to the design problem, evolve their own material palette 2. Conceptualize & develop interior layout and various elements of interior space (seating element, working table element, storage, partitions, false ceiling layout, flooring layout etc) 3. Put nomenclature in the drawing with essential dimensions, specifications and surface finishes 4. Via studio discussion understand the sequence and method of construction as undertaken on site and align drawing production.

5. Generate 3D models (physical and/or digital) and walkthroughs to demonstrate the design decisions in form of built spaces Final outcome was detailed working drawings (plans, sections, elevations) for their design and detailed drawings for identified elements of interior space (as mentioned in point # 2)

222

222

222

Fig 1 223 223

223

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Konkona, Tejaswini, Lakshita, Ashesha, Sakshi, Yug, Fiza Interior space and furniture renders Fig 2 Isha Patel Table design for a Radio station office Fig 3 Rutvi Patel Storage design for a Fashion studio office.

Fig 4 Yashvee Sheth Table design for Publishing house office

Fig 5 Isha Patel Storage design for a Radio station office Fig 6 Ashesha Shah Table design for a Film production office Fig 7 Lakshita Grade Storage design for a VFX and animation studio Fig 8 Fiza Elat Storage design for a Textile innovation office Fig 9 Konkona Das Seating and ceiling design for an Animation studio

Faculty of Design IR2024 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

224

224

224

Fig 3

Fig 4 225 225

225

Faculty of Design IR2024 Monsoon 2021

226

Design UG Level-2

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

226

226

Fig 8

Fig 9 227 227

227

BD3001

Furniture: Branding and Retail; A Complete Experience Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Ashini Shah

Faculty of Design BD3001 Monsoon 2021

4 th year Aashman Amin Apoorv Magdum Arundhati Jaiswal Aryan Kapoor Het Desai Isha Shah Jayashre B G Kathan Chauhan Kinshuk Adeshra Maitreya Pathak Mayank Jindal Pooja Patel Suhani S Nathan Vishakha Bhatt

Naandi Parikh

Anand Belhe

Retail design is a service oriented industry where the client has got a very specific requirement of their space with a primary purpose of displaying and selling their products. It is very important that the spatial design of such spaces creates a lasting impact on the customer along with promoting an enjoyable and hassle-free shopping experience. Retail spaces hence need to be specially fashioned according to the kind of product being sold in that space, necessitating the concept of brand building.

Brand building, though appears to be an exercise in marketing, is equally important an exercise in spatial design as the spaces in which brands operate: their branded environments are their most powerful touch points. These spaces provide an opportunity of converting the intangible aspects of a brand into tangible customer experiences. Bringing together these two ideas of ‘Retailing’ and ‘Brand Building’ the studio focused on developing design approaches and products for a leading Furniture retail brand. Students researched and designed an International Furniture Company and developed a display system for their products.

228

228

228

Fig. 1 229 229

229

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Kinshuk Adeshra Concept models and Prototype for Family of Home office Products Fig 2. Group 7 Kinshuk Adeshra and Kathan Chauhan Branding poster explaining retail store design and visual merchandising(in collab with IR3002 Brand Building through Spatial Design) Fig 3. Students Work Ikea Research Fig 4. Students Work History of Design Fig 5. Aashman Amin Product 1_Process Sheet Fig 6. Aashman Amin Product 1_Concept Model Fig 7. Aashman Amin Product 1_Technical Drawing Fig 8. Aashman Amin Product 1_Technical Drawing Branding

Fig 9. Aashman Amin Product 1_ Rendered 3D Fig 10. Kathan Chauhan Product 2 _Process Sheet Fig 11. Kathan Chauhan Product 2 _Technical Drawing Fig 12. Kathan Chauhan Product 2 _Exploded Detail Fig 13. & 14.Kathan Chauhan Product 2 _Final Scaled Model Fig 15. & 16. Aryan Kapoor Product 3_ Process Sheet Fig 17. Aryan Kapoor Product 3_Technical Drawing Fig 18. Aryan Kapoor Product 3_Concept Models Fig 19. Aryan Kapoor Product 3_Final Scaled Model IKEA_Research

Faculty of Design BD3001 Monsoon 2021

Fig. 2

230

Fig. 3

History of Design

Fig. 4 Product 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9 231

Design UG Level-3

Product 2

Faculty of Design BD3001 Monsoon 2021

232

Fig. 14

Fig. 13

Fig. 11 Fig. 10

Fig. 12

Product 3

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

Fig. 19 233

IR3010

Reuse & Revive: Hospitality spaces

Unit Assistant Krishna Ramanuj

Faculty of Design IR3010 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Bhavya Parikh Jinal Patel Ishita Patel Vibhakshi Zala Riya Choksi Uttara Gupta Samriddhi Arora Pratika Kshetrimayum

5 th Year Anusha Bishnoi Isha Garg Shivani Pandya Dhruvi Sheth Vruti Shah

Dexter Pereira The focus of the studio was on the detailed design of interior spaces and elements framed by critical interrogation of key debates, positions and practices in conservation & reuse. It explored the notion of socio-cultural context while developing an appreciation for built fabric with heritage values.

The core of the studio stressed upon creating meaning of place, in being sensitive to its roots while superimposing a new function with respect to user experience. Initial weeks of the studio focused on introducing and sensitizing students about the meaning of adaptive reuse by undertaking case studies and specific research exercises (which included socio-cultural, contextual & regulatory aspects of adaptive reuse). Students then explored in-depth reasons & attitudes revolving around user experience, material use and tectonics using models explaining interventions & inferences. This combined knowledge was put to test via a series of time problems exploring spatial possibilities.

Post spatial explorations, students reflected upon their learning & cohesively designed with respect to a given hospitality program on a heritage site.

234

234

234

Fig 1 235 235

235

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Vruti Shah Iso View Fig 2 Riya Choksi, Samriddhi Arora Basic zoning and Iso View Fig 3 Samriddhi Arora Longitudinal Section Fig 4 Vruti Shah Exterior View Fig 5 Pratika Kshetrimayum Outdoor Cafe Fig 6 Samriddhi Arora Reception -Mood board and elevation

Fig 7 Dhruvi Shah Reception -Mood board and elevation Fig 8 Samriddhi Arora Restaurant -Mood board and elevation Fig 9 Jinal Patel Waiting area -Mood board and elevation Fig 10 Samriddhi Arora Restaurant Fig 11 Anusha Bisnoi Guest room Fig 12 Anusha Bisnoi Restaurant Fig 13 Jinal Patel Lounge area interiors

Faculty of Design IR3010 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2b

Fig 2

Fig 3 236

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6 237

Design UG Level-3

Fig 7

Faculty of Design IR3010 Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

238

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13 239 239

239

IR3011

Interior / Skin / Context

Unit Assistant Adnan Makda

Faculty of Design IR3011 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Aneri Surati Anjali Sharma Khadija Mansuri Raj Panchal Vedanshi Sarda

5 th Year Chinmayee Parikh Dhvani Khamar Jasoda Bhansali Manav Patel Naman Jain Pooja Shah Shreya Gajjar Vishnu Asrith

Mohammad Ayazkhan In architecture and design, the design process typically starts with defining the ‘Shell/ Architecture’ of the building as a first step. The factors affecting the ‘Shell’/‘Architecture’ are, by and large, ‘external’ in nature such as: climate, privacy.

The idea of ‘Shelter’ dominates the process of design and plays a crucial role in generating the form of the building. The interior elements are generated as the next step in the process in a manner that justifies the requirements ‘imposed’ by the ‘shell’. In this process, the ‘architecture’/‘shell’ becomes a dominating force in determining interior layout and interior elements.

The intent of this unit was to find a synthesis in the design process such that the ‘boundary’ between ‘architecture’ and ‘Interior Architecture’ gets dissolved, to pave the way for a built form that is primarily a resultant of ‘Interior Architecture’. In order to achieve this, the studio focused on a process that seeks to ‘reverse’ the above mentioned traditional design process. In this studio-unit, students were encouraged to evolve interior elements and systems as the first step in the design process; the ‘skin’/architecture of the project was generated as the next step by synthesizing the conflicting requirements generated by the ‘interior’ and ‘exterior’ forces

240

240

240

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3 241 241

241

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Fig 1 Vedanshi Sarda Plans Fig 2 Vedanshi Sarda Views Fig 3 Vedanshi Sarda Elevation Fig 4 Shreya Gajjar Plan Fig 5 Shreya Gajjar Perspective Section Fig 6 Shreya Gajjar Short Section Fig 7 Manav Patel Perspective Section

Fig 8 Manav Patel Exploded Isometric Fig 9 Manav Patel Elevation Fig 10 Raj Panchal Plan Fig 11 Raj Panchal Model View Fig 12 Vishnu Asrith Views Fig 13 Vishnu Asrith Short Section Fig 14 Vishnu Asrith Long Section

Faculty of Design Interior / Skin / Context Monsoon 2021

Fig 4 Fig 2b

Fig 5

Fig 6 242

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9 243

Design UG Level-3

Faculty of Design Interior / Skin / Context Monsoon 2021

Fig 10

Fig 11

244

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14 245 245

245

IR3014

Contextualizing Interior Space Making

Unit Assistant Jaydev Parikh

Faculty of Design IR3014Monsoon 2021

4th Year Ananya Bhardwaj Aniruddha Nilosey Bansari Shah Brinda Jasoliya Neha Gandhi Roshni Adarsh

5 th year Aayushi Bhatt Dhaneshree Ahir Dhruvi Gandhi Moksha Shah Naveli Jain Pritha Rudra Vyas Siddharth Sharma Vaishali Odedra Vanshika Tyagi

Prashant Pradhan

Bharath P

Hospitality Design informed by the local context of Architecture, exterior or interior, can be considered to be a result of an appropriate response to a physical context which can be summarized as “Form Follows Context”. A deeper understanding would include “culture”. The studio explored the interface between interior architecture and its “context” in hospitality design.

If the design of a hotel could showcase the context, it would be an enriching experience for the visitor, while boosting the local economy and preserving the local culture.

The understanding of “critical regionalism” is necessary since it will define the manner in which local architecture, interior and culture will be studied and reinterpreted. Hospitality design that references the local context has always existed but a new genre was created when architects like Geoffrey Bawa and Kerry Hill designed hotels in Sri Lanka and South East Asia. The endeavour of this studio was to ask how architecture can help make a visit memorable?

For the final outcome, students were asked to design the interior of designated areas of a hotel and to present their design in the form of 3D rendered images.

246

246

246

Fig 1 247 247

247

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Aayushi Bhatt Exploded Axo of Reception Lobby Fig 2 Aayushi Bhatt Experience Mapping Fig 3 Gajoldoba Group Context Study Fig 4 Aniruddha Nilosey Guest Room Rendered Axo Fig 5 Moksha Shah Guest Room Rendered Section Fig 6 Aayushi Bhatt Guest Room Rendered View

Faculty of Design IR3014 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

248

Fig 7 Aayushi Bhatt Restaurant Rendered View Fig 8 Pritha Restaurant Rendered View Fig 9 Vaishali Bhima Guest Room Complex Rendered View Fig 10 Dhruvi Gandhi Bar Rendered View Fig 11 Jasoliya Brinda Dilipbhai Bar Rendered View Fig 12 Dhruvi Gandhi Tea lounge Rendered Viev

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6 249

Design UG Level-3

Fig 6

Faculty of Design IR3014 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

250

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12 251 251

251

IR3017

Deviant Orders of The New Workspace

Unit Assistant Harsh Vyas

Faculty of Design IR3017Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Dhvani Kanuga Devanshi Pabari Jeel Mody Khushi Amin Khushi Loonia Pulkit Jain Sakina Tajani Swastika Singh Tulsi Detroja

5 th Year Bhakti Shah Dhruvi Shah Dhwani Arora Kirti Jangra Niyati Gupta Khushi Jain

Ratna Shah

Errol Reubens Jr

As cities become denser, resources deplete, economies recalibrate and unprecedented events disrupt the normal, traditional structures of working and collaborating. The global pandemic has made us realize and re-question the modes of working and collaborating. In the immediate present, the workspace dynamics are altering globally to become decentralized and grow inward, in turn, reconfiguring the interiors for the diverse, the shared and the active exchange.

In this studio, we looked at the deviants to the normal that cause certain connections as possible solutions to the new ways of working or ‘co-working’. Key concepts of ‘community’, ‘wellness’ and collaboration became the launching points to understand and define the new workspace interiority. Creating interiors that have a design language derived out of qualitative and metaphorical allusion to aspects of ‘work space’ were used as a primary design tool. Each initial exercise delved into the aspects of spatial environments driven by narratives, into intangible elements driven by tectonic studies as well as systems and into materiality driven by services and material atmospheres.

252

252

252

Fig 1 253 253

253

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Pulkit Jain Final design project, Exploded Axonometric View, Fig 2 Pulkit Jain Interpretation and visualisation from the Invisible Cities Fig 3 Khushi Loonia Staging The Space, Conceptual Montage Fig 4 Jeel Mody Staging The Space, Conceptual Montage Fig 5 Devanshi Pabari Final Design Project, Rendered Plan Fig 6 Devanshi Pabari Final Design Project, Rendered Section

Fig 7 Pulkit Jain Image Imagining, Conceptual Montage Fig 8 Dhruvi Shah Image Imagining, Conceptual Montage Fig 9 Kirti Jangra Image Imagining, Conceptual Montage Fig 10 Devanshi Pabari Final Design project, Axonometric View Fig 11 Kirti Jangra Final Design project, Axonometric View

Faculty of Design IR3017 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3 254

Fig 4

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 5

Fig 6 6 Fig 255 255

255

Design UG Level-3

Fig 7

Faculty of Design IR3017 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 9

256

Fig 10

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig Fig1211 257

IR3002

Brand Building through Spatial Design

Unit Assistant Urvashi Gurubaxani

Faculty of Design IR3002 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Heer Patel Meher Shah

5 th Year Aashni Thakore Ananda Krishnan Kratika Gupta Manav Budhani Nidhi Radadia Rutika Vora Shalabh Bhatnagar Shraddha Udhwani Shyambhavi Shukla Somya Modi Yashasvi Asati

Ruchi Mehta With the rise of e-commerce and omnichannel retailing and ubiquity of “brands” in the last few decades, the relevance as well as design approaches for “retailing” and “brand building” have evolved significantly. These novel challenges are demanding new approaches to retail store design. These are the challenges that tomorrow’s interior designers will be facing in their professional careers. To address this evolving nature of retail store design, this studio focused on design of a variety of retail formats through the lens of brand building.

The students selected their own design problems/brand that is either expanding its product/service portfolio; is a new and growing brand; is a brand that needs a flagship store or an experience centre to deal with its omni-channel presence; or is an old brand that requires revamping of its image.

The students’ projects commenced with an interpretation of the brand’s overall strategy, selection of the site and development of the program for an appropriate retail format. They then produced spatial design solutions for creating brand-centric customer experiences and presented the design with a complete set of schematic drawings, models and views and graphics to communicate the strategies.

258

258

258

Fig 1 259 259

259

Design UG Level-3

Fig 6 Shyambhavi Shukla Customer Journey of Zivame Flagship Store Fig 7 Aashni Thakore 3D Visualization for Turn Black’s Flagship Store Fig 8 Shalabh Bhatnagar 3D Visualization for TATA’s Experience Store Fig 9 Meher Shah 3D Visualization for GoPro’s Experience Store Fig 10 Somya Modi 3D Visualization for Neeman’s Flagship Store Fig 11 Kratika Gupta 3D Visualization for Ellementry’s Flagship Store

Fig 2

Fig 3

Faculty of Design IR3002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Manav Budhani Design Strategy for Boat Lifestyle’s Experience Store Fig 2 Yashasvi Asati Visual Merchandise strategy for Suta’s Flagship Store Fig 3 Somya Modi Visual Merchandise strategy for Neeman’s Flagship store Fig 4 Nidhi Radadia Visual Merchandise Design for House of Wandering Silk’s Flagship store Fig 5 Heer Patel Interior Space Mood board for Freakin’s Flagship store

VM Strategy Modules

The module and material of the rack system are designed to give a luxurious with comfortable experience to the customer.

Each module contains one collection and adjacent to a couch to have a comfortable shopping e x p e r i e n c e .

Signature up-cycled beaded necklaces with a silk crafted apparel

Mannequins showing combination of colors and styles with different apparels paired together

MODULE-1, 2X2

Fig 4 260

Fig 5 Rendered view of the space with apparel

Fig 6

261

Design UG Level-3

Faculty of Design IR3002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

262

Fig 10

Fig 11 263

IR3016

Child Centric Healing Spaces

Unit Assistant Rhea Joseph

Faculty of Design IR3016Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Ayushi Patel Harshika Choudhary Helee Joshi Krishi Jhaveri Nandini Kataria Saumya Khimesara Yati Aggarwal Zeel Thaker

5 th Year Devika Sharma Ishika Mehta Mitali Srivastava Nikul Dodiya Janam Prajapati Shristy Baid Sukruti Marshetti Vedica Kedia

Sujit Kothiwale

Neha Kothiwale

For many of us during childhood, a casual mention of a visit to the doctor’s clinic was enough to cause a pang of anxiety. The long boring wait, the dreary walls and the impossibly high furniture of the clinic, would exacerbate our restlessness. Propped on a cold steel chair, we were intimidated by the doctor’s examination and the sternness of the matronly staff.

Research indicates that mental well-being is critical to healing. Roger S. Ulrich, a noted researcher explains, ‘Alleviating patient stress is a significant clinical goal because stress is both a negative health outcome in itself and has a variety of detrimental psychological, physical and behavioural effects that worsen other outcomes.’

A warm, familiar and an engaging environment puts children at ease and helps them heal.

Opportunities to interact with other children and undertake age-appropriate activities, bring about some semblance of normalcy for them.

Designing for children requires us to humanize the hospital experience while maintaining functionality and efficiency.

‘Healing children’ aspires to conceive healing environments by putting ‘empathy’ at the core of its efforts. It was an opportunity to understand the world from children’s perspective and design humane gestures that touch their lives in unique ways.

264

264

264

Fig 1

Fig 1 265 265

265

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Group Work Melange of Ideas Fig 2 Yati, Krishi, Nandini Explorations in sketches Fig 3 Nandini,Devika,Zeel,Shristy Explorations in models Fig 4 Krishi,Harshika, Nandini Layout and views of Entrance.

Fig 5 Devika, Mitali,Shristy,Nikul, Zeel, Janam Views of Outpatient Department.

Fig 6 Vedica,Krishi,Saumya,Nandini, Shristy Layouts of Outpatient Department.

Fig 7 Shristy, Harshika,Vedica, Nikul,Nandini Views of Inpatient Department rooms Fig 8 Vedica,Zeel, Krishi Layouts of Inpatient Department. Shristy Site plan.

Fig 9 Janam, Saumya, Nikul ,Shristy, Krishi Views of Design Element Fig 10 Krishi View of 3D Isometric Fig 11 Nikul View of Outpatient Department waiting area.

Faculty of Design IR3016 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4 266

Fig 3

Fig 5

Fig 6 267

Design UG Level-3

Fig 7

Faculty of Design IR3016 Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

268

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11 269 269

269

270

Kanisha Patel UR3003, Urban Panning and Regulations: Intent, Manifestation and Design Tulika Nabar Bhasin, Nishi Shah

270

FACULTY OF PLANNING

271

271

UR2005

From Utopias to Heterotopias Migrant Housing: Values of Time, Density and Culture Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Zeel Patel

Faculty of Planning UR2005 Monsoon 2021

3 rd year Aswin Joshy Ayushi Goyal Juhi Desai Mani Chauhan Mehul Saily Moksha Shah Pooja Shah Shaurya Singh Srushti Kottai Yogan Shah

Imran Mansuri The course introduced concepts of `housingfor-mass’ across space and time. The evolution of housing settlements through linking and stacking; their processes, determinants/ generations, and resulting patterns were explored in their respective contexts exploring the balance between order and complexity.

The idea was to create an adaptive habitat for migrant communities associated with the very dynamic and socially interactive live-work environment. Here, “adaptability” has been visualized and represented as a real space, accommodative of people from diverse cultures and traditions over time. The spaces, thus created have their own characteristics; with occupants having opportunities to alter these spaces in certain extended patterns. Eventually, this fluctuating habitat, over time must be able to maintain a balance between generated orders and identified contextual complexities.

The students learned to analyze and identify issues with the linking and stacking of modular housing units. This helped them in planning and organizing various ensembles in response to the open spaces and adjacent urban context. The students were also able to explore housing clusters & ensembles by balancing the underlying orders and complexities.

272

272

272

Inferences

Fig 1 273 273

273

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Juhi Desai, Mani Chauhan, Aswin Joshy Based on the site visit, documentation and site analysis, the students identified inferences based on their importance in hierarchy Fig 2 Yogan Shah, Juhi Desai, Shaurya Singh Diagrams showing the site analysis and observations of students on Surat site after documenting it Fig 3 Ayushi Goyal, Aswin Joshy, Pooja Shah Elevation showing the character of street after Surat site visit

Fig 4 Yogan Shah, Juhi Desai, Shaurya Singh Sections showing the character of migrant housing typology Fig 5 Ayushi Goyal, Aswin Joshy, Pooja Shah Isometric view of the street section showing the intricate details of the staircase Fig 6 Aswin Joshy Digrams showing the detailed unit layout Fig 7 Aswin Joshy Diagrams showing the generation and linking of the cluster Fig 8 Aswin Joshy Final Site Plan and Sections showing the response to the Commercial Edge

SE

Faculty of Planning UR2005 Monsoon 2021

SE

SE

CO

FRO

TUTO

Fig 2

274

274

274

Fig 3

SECTIONAL ELEVATION EE’ + 6.00 M

The oc the by The on wa mo sm in t

+ 6.00 M + 6.00 M + 3.00 M

+ 3.00 M + 3.00 M

-+ 0.00 M -+ 0.00 M

SECTION AA’

+ - 0.00 M

SCALE 1:50

SECTION BB’

SCALE 1:50

+ 6.00 M

+ 6.00 M

+ 3.00 M

+ 3.00 M

-+ 0.00 M

SECTION CC’

COMMERCE IN THE CENTER OF THE COURTYARD

SCALE 1:50

OCCUPYING THE SHADE FROM BUILDINGS IN THE AFTERNOONS

FROM UTOPIA TO HETEROTOPIA

TUTOR : IMRAN MANSURI | TA: ZEEL PATEL

-+ 0.00 M

Fig 4

SECTION DD’

USED FOR UNORGANIZED AND WIDER PARKING SPACES

DEMARCATED BOUNDARIES

CHOWKDI EXT

SITE : NEHRU NAGAR, SURAT

GROUP MEMBERS : JUHI, YOGAN, SHAURYA

Fig 5 275 275

275

Planning UG Level-2 ground floor units

Faculty of Planning UR2005 Monsoon 2021

Fig 6

first floor units

Generation & LinkinG

GENERATION: LINK

Unit Cl

Each cluster has al the units have cros them. The overall li an

FROM UTOPI

RE IMRAN The TUTOR: units are dev circulation and see ground floor units

second floor units

Generation & LinkinG

GENERATION: LINKING AND STACKING Unit ClUster i: Mixed Use Units Each cluster has almost 10 units oriented in such a way that all the units have cross ventialtion as well as open spaces along them. The overall linking of the units are in a circular orientation, and stacked upon each other.

first floor units

The units are developed in such a way to have a coherent circulation and seemless serivices along the full cluster within the row arrangment.

ground floor units

RES third floor units first floor units

FROM UTOPIA TO HETEROTOPIA second floor units

semi-open spaces

TUTOR: IMRAN MANSURI | TA: ZEEL PATEL

multifunctional spaces/sleeping area

second floor units

Unit Configuration SITE C1: ASWIN JOSHY

semi-open spaces

mixed use spaces

multifunctional spaces/sleeping area mixed use spaces circulation

[staircases]

circulation [staircases]

services [toilets, bathrooms]

third floor units

semi-open spaces circulation [staircases]

services [toilets, bathrooms] third floor units

TO HETEROTOPIA Fig 7 UTOPIAFROM FROM TO UTOPIA HETEROTOPIA TUTOR: IMRAN MANSURI | TA: ZEEL PATEL

Unit Configuration: Generation & Stacking

SITE C1: ASWIN JOSHY

FROM TUTOR:

276

276 TUTOR: IMRAN MANSURI | TA: ZEEL PATEL

Unit Configuration: Generation & Stacking SITE C1: ASWIN JOSHY

276

Facto

ries

and

Mills

C Facto

ries

and

Mills

D

A’ D’

A’ A

D’

co M

B’

M l

cia er t

e re

st

B co M

B’

M cia er l

coMM

st

unity

e re

cent

t

re

B coMM

unity

cent

re

C’

ETEROTOPIA

SITE PLAN

I | TA: ZEEL PATEL

SITE C1: Aswin Joshy

SCALE 1:200 C’

FROM UTOPIA TO HETEROTOPIA

SITE PLAN

RESPONSE COMMERCE: TUTOR: IMRAN MANSURI | TO TA: ZEEL PATEL

SITE C1: Aswin Joshy

Commercial street

Footpath

Secondary Road

SCALE 1:200

Footpath

Mixed Use housing with responce to commerce

RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY CENTRE:

Housing Units

Hollow plinth housing for extended activities.

Footpath

Secondary Road

Community Centre

Fig 8 FROM UTOPIA TO HETEROTOPIA

SITE RESPONSE- SECTIONS

TUTOR: IMRAN MANSURI | TA: ZEEL PATEL

SITE C1: Aswin Joshy

SCALE 1:100 277

277

277

UR2022

What’s On the Plate - Sustainable Urbanism on Food Production, Consumption and Dissipation Focus Visualizing and Communicating Unit Assistant Vikas Gajera

Faculty of Planning UR2022 Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Ketki Bochare Navonil Maji

3 rd year Aadrita Borooah Elangkumaran S Heena Agrawal Niharika O T Priya Thottappally Richa Mishra Shreya Sonar

Katsushi Goto

Aditi Anand Kumar

The late 1800s saw a proliferation of household manuals aimed at describing housekeeping, cooking and dining practices for the Victorian and Edwardian Households, and with the Empire, to British colonies in the rest of the world. In the studio, we rethought the ways we cook and dine with particular attention to kitchen and table arrangement, dining table and spatial organization of the rooms while articulating what has become the mundane culture/ consumption of food. The aim was to document and create ‘manuals’ for cooking and dining, and to catalogue and observe transformations in current cooking and dining practices. Further, we addressed scale and cyclical notion of food distribution, consumption and dissipation while confirming the current imbalance created between rural and urban.

‘The emptying of the countryside is having a more drastic impact than the intensification of the city. While the city becomes more itself, the countryside is transforming into something new’ (Rem Koolhaas, Countryside, 2020).

Design projects must be strategic towards the distribution of functions that support production and logistics, for spatial organization for culture/consumption and for conceptualizing sustainability within collection and dissipation of food waste to bring it back to the production cycle

278

278

278

Fig 1

Fig 2

279 279

279

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Richa Mishra Documentation drawings of food habits Fig 2 Priya Thottappally Final intervention 3d view and elevation Fig 3 Priya Thottappally Documentation drawings of food habits Fig 4 Ketki Bochare Food waste documentation Fig 5 Navonil Maji Photogrammetry model of dining space Fig 6 Elangkumaran S Photogrammetry and observation drawings of eating space

Fig 7 Aadrita Borooah Documentation drawings of food habits Fig 8 Ketki Bochare Design intervention drawings Fig 9 Richa Mishra Visualization of design intent Fig 10 Elangkumaran S Site condition mapping in relation to food sources Fig 11 Elangkumaran S Axonometric explanation of Design intervention

Faculty of Planning UR2022 Monsoon 2021

Fig 3

Fig 4

280

280

280

Fig 5

Fig 6 281 281

281

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Planning UR2022 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

282

282

282

Fig 10

Fig 11 283 283

283

UR2014

Light Infrastructures

Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Aakash Jain

Faculty of Planning UR2014 Monsoon 2021

2nd Year Ambar Agarwal Dipasha Rathod Diya Shah Prayush Shah Rajat Kapoor Swayamsiddh Dash Tanishka Singh Udit Shah

3rd Year Kanishka Wadehra Sahana Desai

Kruti D Shah

Sebastian Trujillo Torres

Our studio investigated schools, learning how architecture supports pedagogical innovation and improves the experiences of students.

We departed from a social perspective, noting the vast spatial and programmatic differences between government, low cost and high cost private schools.

We used an iterative process of design and analysis, to make proposals for low cost schools.

Students transformed existing Ahmedabad schools which required urgent improvements.

They responded not only to the current situation but were asked to address further programmatic requirements in different phases and were assessed on how they respond to these shifting contingencies in the brief. Analysis was conducted using software developed by the Space Syntax Lab at the Bartlett UCL. This is not a parametric tool. It is used to understand how spatial planning enables types of social interaction in buildings.

By the end of this exercise, students made a proposal for the selected building which comprised a new comprehensive pedagogical model in relation to spatial structures. They also produced a stimulating architectural inquiry into the possibilities of working on existing structures with remarkable budget constraints and complex social necessities.

284

284

284

A transit settlement camp in the AES Hostel grounds, Ahmedabad

Portrait format, single or composed image

Fig 1 285 285

285

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Diya Sahana Kanishka Site Plan Fig 2 Kanishka Participation strategies Game board Fig 3 Sahana Desai Frugal city making elements construction detail Fig 4 Dipasha Rathod Internet hub usages Fig 5 Prayush ShahTransit housing kit

construction details Fig 6 Ambar Agarwal Emergency public architecture Plans and Iso Fig 7 Rajat Kapoor Mobile infrastructure usages Fig 8 Rajat Kapoor Mobile infrastructure construction details

A community participation based game board as a design tool

Faculty of Planning UR2014 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

286

286

286

Fig 3

Fig 4 287 287

287

2.4.1

CUTTING AND SEGRIGATING EPS FLOOR PANELS AND PUFF PANELS

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Planning UG Level-2

B A 2

Cut the floor panels and Puff panels according to given dimesions and segrigate them for ease of installation

1.5.2

1

2400mm

3000mm

CATALOUGE OF CORTYARDS

A 3

C

1200mm

600mm

600mm

EPS Floor panel

2.5.1

Puff panel

1450mm

GENRAL PLUMBING AND INSTALLATION OF DRAINS AND GUTTERS

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

A-Flat Facades 131

B

Install the drains and gutters as per the reqierments of shristi project’s rain water harvesting UNIT LIGHT NFRASTRUCTURE | TRANSIT HOUSING KIT | UTC LOK NIKETAN | COUNSTRUCTION MANUAL reqierments

Internal Interaction-Least 132

B A

External Interaction-Modrate

Install the pipeline system as per the reqierments

B

B-Outward Facing Facades Internal Interaction-Modrate External Interaction-Most

C-Inward Facing Facades

Faculty of Planning UR2014 Monsoon 2021

Internal Interaction-Most External Interaction-Least

1.8.1 USAGES (KAARYASTHAL) Fig 5 139

27

27

140

UNIT LIGHT NFRASTRUCTURE | TRANSIT HOUSING KIT | UTC LOK NIKETAN | COUNSTRUCTION MANUAL

1.7.2 Fig 6MUKHYALAYA (PLAN)

UNIT LIGHT NFRASTRUCTURE | TRANSIT HOUSING KIT | UTC LOK NIKETAN | COUNSTRUCTION MA

1.7.3 KAARYASTHAL (PLANS)

MS 2021 | Unit Light Infrastructure

Utpaadan Kendra | Introduction

A’

B’

B C

C’

KEY PLAN

C’ MS 2021 | Unit Light Infrastructure

Utpaadan Kendra | Introduction

0

1

3

6 METERS

KEY PLAN 1819

C

C’

A

A

17

28

A’

C

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

0

1

3

6 METERS

MS 2021 | Unit Light Infrastructure

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

KEY PLAN Utpaadan Kendra | Design Process

0

1

3

6 METERS 20

288

288

288

4 THE PANELS STAGES

Fig 7 EXPECTED RESULTS

Necessary Tools and People Required

1

Note: The panels are shown in their actual colour in which they are to be painted.

F4

F5

PUF PANEL

F8

2 F4

3

F6 F9

4

F7

A3

ALUMINIUM PANEL A2

5

F1

Painter

A2

6

A1

F2

F3

A1

Supervisor

7

8 Volunteer 1

Ladder

9

Screw gun

Materials Required Marker

Metal grinding machine

10

11

Right angled scale

Volunteer 2

DAYS

STEP 01

4.1 PREPARE THE PIECES

Carpenter

Measuring tape

1

2

5

4

3

2

6

9

8

7

30mm thick aluminium plate

30mm thick PUF panel

30mm thick plywood board

12 EPDM WASHER

L-sections (40x40x5)mm

13

3 THE ROOF

79

STAGES

1

EXPECTED RESULTS PRABHAAV AUSHADHI TEMPO

Necessary Tools and People Required

STAGES

1

SOLAR PANEL(S)

L-sections (20x20x3)mm

Light section self tapping screw with EPDM washer

2 THE MAINFRAME CONSTRUCTION MANUAL

15mm thick glass

Necessary Tools and People Required P5

2

P8 P4

Carpenter

P5 P9

S2

P3 S1

S3

S1

S4S4 S6

S2

6

MS L-SECTION

P5 P7

P5

S3

5 Supervisor Screw gun

MS T-SECTION

P2

4

P4

Metal grinding machine

P4

P6

P3

5

6

P7 P9

P5

Angle grinder

3

3

4

P6

2

PUF PANEL P1

P2

Hinge

EXPECTED RESULTS

80

S1 S2

P1

P1

MS C-SECTION (BEHIND L-SECTION)

P1

Ladder

Volunteer 1 Screw gun

7

7

Measuring tape

Volunteer 1

Primary frame Secondary frame

Carpenter

9

Marker

Welder

Right angled scale

10

Refer to process 1 of the pieces preparation section to look at the step by step preparation of the MS plates required for this step.

Pieces Required

Welding Machine

Measuring tape DAYS

11

1

2 2

3

5

4

6

7

8

EPDM WASHER

9 120mm long MS rail

30mm thick PUF panel

Light section self tapping screw with EPDM washer

8

Marker

9

10

11

L-sections (40x40x5)mm

Refer to process 2 & 4 of the pieces preparation section to look at the step by step preparation of the pieces required for this step.

Welder Metal grinding machine

Volunteer 2

Supervisor

Welding Machine

Pieces Required

DAYS

1

EPDM WASHER

2 2

3

5

4

6

7

8

9

L-sections (20x20x3)mm

13 71

PRABHAAV AUSHADHI TEMPO

CONSTRUCTION MANUAL

L-sections (20x20x3)mm

Clamp (80x40x40)mm

72

MS plate 30mm thickness

MS L-sections (40x40x5)mm

MS C-sections (20x20x3)mm

12

12

2.1 PREPARE THE PIECES

Welding Shield Gloves

Right angled scale

13

Light section self tapping screw with EPDM washer

MS L-sections (20x20x3)mm

63

STEP 01

Welding Shield Gloves

Volunteer 2

STEP 01

3.1 PREPARE THE PIECES

8

PRABHAAV AUSHADHI TEMPO

CONSTRUCTION MANUAL

MS T-sections (40x20x3)mm

Fig 8

64

289 289

289

UR2020

In Transit: Making a place between Arrival and Departure Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Kruti V Shah

Faculty of Planning UR2020 Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Adarsh Joseph Ankit Bhatt Batul Sethwala Dainty Doe J Divya Thakkar Kanishk Mitali Vadher Samriddhi R Dugar Sonali Badapanda Tanay Chopra

3 rd year Bhoomika Patel Mitali Vadher Samriddhi R Dugar Sonali Badapanda Vidhi Shah

Mihir Bedekar

Maulik Chauhan

As transit has become an integral part of our daily life, Transit places have become integral parts of our cities as they are Public spaces that facilitate the use of public Transport.

Transit Places connect people in a region and a community to the outside world. Transit places allow people to Transit between different modes of Transport. Transit places allow for a greater footfall and gathering of People which acts as a catalyst for the growth of the local economy.

Transit places where multiple modes of transport are connected allow for efficient use of land and other resources in turn providing better connectivity and improved quality of service for the Passengers. Having understood the importance of Transit Places, the studio aimed to design an Intermodal transit Centre for the Temple town of Kayavarohan. The Intermodal Transit Centre shall connect the entire regional transit system of the western railway and State bus service to the surrounding community of the Town.

The studio aimed to design and develop userfriendly elements for the Transit system. The studio also focused on making the Transit Place well integrated with the adjacent land uses and developments. The design of the Transit center addressed the issues of accessibility, safety and convenience

290

290

290

Fig 1 291 291

291

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Group Work 3D views of students works Fig 2 Tanay Chopra, Transit Experience Fig 3 Adarsh Joseph, Transit Experience Fig 4 Vidhi Shah, Diagrams of organisation of spaces and circulation Fig 5 Adarsh Joseph, Diagrams of organisation of spaces and circulation

Fig 6 Tanay Chopra, Transit Module Exploration Fig 7 Vidhi Shah Transit Module Exploration Fig 8 Group Work Construction details of students works

Faculty of Planning UR2020 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

292

292

292

Fig 6

293 293

293

Faculty of Planning UR2020 Monsoon 2021

294

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 7

294

294

Fig 8 295 295

295

UR2016

Un-Gendering the Everyday City

Focus Planning and Organizing Unit Assistant Isha Chouksey

Faculty of Planning UR2016 Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Anandita Onkar Anshika Agrawal Khushi Jain Nandini Dangwal

3 rd year Simran Khatter

Sahiba Gulati

Shreya Gambhir

In India, vehicle ownership usually lies with men, whether it is a car, a two-wheeler, or a bicycle, to say nothing of auto-rickshaws. Our cities, however, are imagined around the automobile.

How do we imagine a city that recognizes that half of its population does not own a vehicle?

How do we imagine a city where half of the population is a woman? Through research conducted by various authors, ranging from Phadke, Ranade and Khan to Ayona Datta, and through personal research, it is apparent that the street as a public space belongs more to a man than a woman.

According to Ayona Datta, women’s presence in the public street is legitimised by the production of her morality; according to Phadke, Khan and Ranade, women constantly exhibit their purpose to be in public space; they are never there without a reason. The city constantly legitimises domesticities for women, especially women from poor households. All of this limits their mobility, access to greater opportunities and their right to claim public spaces in the city. How then do you normalise the presence of a female in the city, and a growing female workforce? How then do we re-imagine the street? And by re-imagining the street, how then do we re-imagine the city itself?

296

296

296

Fig 1

Fig 2 297 297

297

Informal Residences

Temples

Individual houses facing away from the street.

Trees The side walls are blank and hence these residences are dissociated from the street.

ANALYSIS

Planning UG Level-2

The compound wall having spikes on top immediately shows the outsiders are not allowed. This is another way Formal Commercial shops inresidences which these formal residences remove themselves fromthe street.

Temples

Fig 1 Anandita Onkar Mapping through Fig 6 Anshika Agrawal Section through Memory, Fergusson College Road,ThePune street, Gulbai Tekra unclaimed land makes the side of the street an uncontested space.

Fig 2 Simran Khatter Where do Women Fig 7 Simran Khatter Design Proposal for The lack of space iside the Tekra foreces people to spill out their activities on the streets.

Go? Ashram Road Ashram Road There is a strongDue sense of community within to offset from the compound wall and the space. Thesethe factors combined them dense trees, the lead street becomes visually Fig 3 Anshika Agrawal Analysis for Fig 8 Anshika Agrawal Re-imagined to stake their claim on the street.

A lack of inaccessible and hence ownership from the formal residences are also movement mapping, Gulbai Section, Ashram Road seen. Tekra Fig 4 Anshika Agrawal Anchor Maps, Fig 9 Simran Khatter Re-imagned Gulbai Tekra movement analysis for Ashram Road Fig 5 Anshika Agrawal Analyzing Fig 10 Nandini Dangwal Design Proposal gendered patterns on the street, Gulbai for Riverfront Tekra Informal Residences

Trees

The lack of space iside the Tekra foreces people to spill out their activities on the streets.

There is a strong sense of community within the space. These factors combined lead them to stake their claim on the street. A lack of ownership from the formal residences are also seen.

PRIVATIZATION AND OWNERSHIP OF THE STRE

NERSHIP OF THE STREET BUILDING TYPOLOGY

PRIVATIZATION AND OWNERSHIP OF THE STREET

BUILDING TYPOLOGY Old women

Young women

Middle aged women

Old women

Middle aged women

Young women

Pauses for women

ses for women

tion of pause

ure Pause

k Pause

Faculty of Planning UR2016 Monsoon 2021

ses for men

Pauses for women

Pauses for men

Pauses for men

Duration of pause

Duration of pause

Leisure Pause Leisure Pause Work Pause

Work Pause

w w

WOMEN ACCORDING TO AGE GROUPS

SPACES OF PAUSE

ACTIVITIES IN THE

Fig 3 WOMEN ACCORDING TO AGE GROUPS Fig 4 ACTIVITIES IN THESE SPACES RADIUS OFCHILDREN PLAYING

E

SPACES OF PAUSE

ACTIVITIE

Legend

Fig 4

298

298

298

FEMALE LEISURE/WORK

During their commute, women are seen Women engaged in all household activities Women are seen sitting on cots outside to stop at temple and interact with others are observed to take pauses in the middle for their homes, working and chatting with already present there. leisure where they chat with other woman. neighbours and women passing by.

The temple falls in route of most women Since a lot of household activities are done on the thresholds, women spend better part going to their place of work. This is also the of the day right outside. Being part of their homes, these spaces are considered safe. The point till where young girls are allowed to women become anchor points for other women who are passing by.

Fig 5 venture. Through the reason of religion, it becomes a space of leisure.

Fig 6 299 299

299

Planning UG Level-2

Legend Fig 1 Name Name Caption 1. Bus2 Stop Fig Name Name Caption 2. Men’s Toilet 3. Women’s Toilet Fig 3 Name Name Caption 4. Play/Path 5. Seating Space 6. Women’s Vending Zone 7. Seating for Screening/Play 8. Screening 9. Autorichshaw Parking 10. Green Space/Seating

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

10

9

1

2

3

Faculty of Planning UR2016 Monsoon 2021

6

7

4 5

8

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

300

300

300

Legend 1. Mounds 2. Playground 3. Outdoor Gym 4. Public Washroom 5. Public Transit 6. Seating Spaces 7. Parking Bays

Fig 10 301 301

301

UR2021

Vulnerability In a Pandemic City

Focus Visualizing and Comunicating Unit Assistant Aryan Iyer

Faculty of Planning UR2021 Monsoon 2021

2 nd Year Anoushka Dutta Jenil Shah Radhika Maitra Romit Sinha Zarna Prajapati

3 rd Year Anoushka Mukherjee Charvi Sawai Geetanjali Reddy Namoshi Basu Naved Ahmed Prachi Thakkar Riva Shah

Vrushti Mawani

Mariana Paisana

Through this studio we mapped and analysed urban vulnerability particularly considering impacts of the COVID outbreak. COVID-19 has suddenly, unforeseeably, and disproportionately impacted populations already vulnerable as a result of occupation, class, migration status, religion, gender, and other factors, who rely on urban public spaces for their basic needs. Social and economic changes along with mandates on social distancing have meant exclusion of vulnerable groups from using public space for their basic needs. These instances raise new challenges for urban designers and planners.

How might we imagine inclusive public spaces in post-COVID Indian cities? This studio is premised in the belief that inclusive public spaces in a post-covid context might be possible if : (a) Urban design takes into account the many ways in which vulnerable groups depend on public spaces for their basic needs, and (b) Design processes have a sufficiently grounded understanding of the myriad ways in which public space is used, governed, and experienced.

302

302

302

Fig 1 303 303

303

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Namoshi Basu Design strategies Contesting hostile architecture Fig 2 Anoushka Mukherjee,Jenil Shah & Riva Shah Mapping - Movement and infrastructure on site Fig 3 Naved Ahmed Analysis - Migration cycles

Fig 4 Naved Ahmed Analysis Significance of site Fig 5 Anoushka Mukherjee Design strategies - A space for women and children Fig 6 Riva Shah Design strategies Sanitation infrastructure

Faculty of Planning UR2021 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

304

304

304

Fig 3

Fig 4 305 305

305

Planning UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Planning UR2021 Monsoon 2021

Fig 5

306

306

306

Fig 6 307 307

307

UR3005

Eco Warriors (Edible to Productive Landscape)

Unit Assistant Piyanka Awatramani

Faculty of Planning UR3005 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Arundhati Hakhu Kashvi Soni Shrayana Ray Soha Gandhi

5 th Year Hariyali Gajera Isha Jain Sakshi Naphade Sharanya Pisharody Abhishek Mummithi

Mansi Shah The unit’s focus was centred on the link between city, food and productive landscapes. A growing or developing city’s infrastructure is particularly reliant on the supply of many inputs (food, water), coupled with an enormous volume of output systems, with considerable externalities.

Due to this, urban growth may have lasting challenges where large and complex systems are invisible and widespread. To make systems visible at neighbourhood level, the studio chose under-utilised areas in Gandhinagar to cultivate new forms of productive development that can reduce some reliance on city services as well as create social spaces.

The studio defined ‘productive’ as a system of landscape development based on an ecologically conscious approach. Among the ideas that it can encompass are food production, water resources, biodiversity, or any other form of ecological development. Taking this approach allows city dwellers to reconnect with natural processes while enhancing the role public spaces can play in the function of cities.

So, to generate innovative ideas, the studio invites students to reimagine 3 key spaces in Gandhinagar i.e. the central vista, a part of the river-side and a residential sector through a productive lens. Landscape design, planting strategies, urban and green integration will be explored, along with policy frameworks that can help transform ideas into well-developed projects.

308

308

308

Fig 1 309 309

309

Planning UG Level-3

Fig 1,7 Shrayana Ray Riverbank, an integrated system of of productive agro based network that lend spaces to community for growing food Fig 2 Sharanya Pisharody Str-EATS: Reimaging ROWs as a continuous and productive network of food and forest gardens Fig 3 Sakshi Naphade Productive Commons: a continuous framework of productive landscapes in the centre of the sector Fig 4 Isha Jain Farmville 2030: reimagining future living with food growing as a way to a productive city

Faculty of Planning UR3005 Monsoon 2021

Fig Fig12 310

Fig 5 Abhishek Mummithi BiodiverCITY: Bringing wildness into the backyards Fig. 6 Hariyali Gajera Water-full: strategies to maximise the infiltration of water and recharge groundwater basins in the city Fig 8 Arundhati Hakhu Synergistic Grounds: transforming the fenced and lawned Central Vista into a system of productive spaces Fig 9 Soha Gandhi Re-wild: Centra Vista as a thriving biodiversity corrido

Fig 2 311

Planning UG Level-3

Faculty of Planning UR3005 Monsoon 2021

Fig 4

312

Fig 6

Fig 5

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9 313 313

313

UR3007

Water Urbanism

Unit Assistant Vaishnavi Akilla

Faculty of Planning UR3007 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Charan V Daksh Tak Kanishk Devlal Krisha A Vasanth K S Yash Shah

5 th Year Aditi Mishra Akshat Chaturvedi Bhavika Makhija Kelly Shah Raghav Kohli Saloni Nathan Tanmay Kapoor

Rajiv Kadam

Piyas Choudhuri

‘Water is constantly in motion; it is changing states, crossing borders, nourishing (and destroying) life. How can water and urbanism be considered together as a generative frame for urban design practice, social life, and ecological regeneration?’: Kate Orff, Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation. Water is the initiator of all primary civilizations. It was amongst the first reasons for agglomerations and settlements.

The way a settlement would respond to the nature of a water body, gave a certain characteristic to its form. While the making of cities have been generally characterized by their association with rivers, there are other layers of water systems including storm water drainage, water retention structures like lakes, stepwells, ponds, and waste water management, all of which are mostly neglected. Cities today want to go beyond their water systems to reinvent the waterfront for shaping its future, driven by economics, politics, place making and imageability. The studio posited that water and cities must be understood within an expanded notion of a constructed ecosystem.

314

314

314

Fig 1

Fig 2 315 315

315

Planning UG Level-3

Fig 1 Tanmay, Charan, Saloni Water Infrastructure Design Proposal Fig 2 Tanmay, Saloni, Charan Nolli’s Plan for Design Conceptualization Fig 3 Kanishk Sections - Design Proposal Fig 4 Raghav, Kanishk, Akshat Sections Design Concept Fig 5 Vasanth Water and Open Spaces

Fig 6 Raghav, Kanishk, Akshat Conceptual Plan Fig 7 Daksh Section - Design Proposal Fig 8 Kanishk Conceptual Plan Fig 9 Tanmay Design Visualization Fig 10 Tanmay Masterplan Fig 11 Tanmay Masterplan Visualization

Faculty of Planning UR3007 Monsoon 2021

Fig 3

01 Picnic spot (HillTop)

Recreational/ Get-aways (15-30° Slope)

Gallery/ Exhibitions (0-15° Slope)

02

Fig 4 316

Spiritual Library

Fig 5

Fig 6 317

Planning UG Level-3

Fig 7

Faculty of Planning UR3007 Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

Fig 9

318

Fig 10

Fig 11 319 319

319

UR3003

Urban Planning and Regulations: Intent, Manifestation & Design

Unit Assistant Gokul Kalaimathi

Faculty of Planning UR3003 Monsoon 2021

4 th Year Archita Varyani Dhanvi Shah Kanisha Patel Khushi Jain Shloka Sanghavi Sneha Ramachandran Teesta Singh Zankhna

5 th Year Jasveer Singh Kalsi Vidushi Tola

Tulika Nabar Nishi Shah Bhasin Indian cities are plagued with, to mention a few, a lack of good quality public realm, insufficient green cover, lack of inclusive pedestrian infrastructure, unaffordable land market, and an over regulatory development framework. Many of these are resultant of an archaic idea of city planning and design but can also be attributed to the effect of multiple city stakeholders and their interactions. These stakeholders (politicians, citizen groups, slum dwellers, architects, engineers, administrators, urban planners/ designers, etc.) and their competing views towards city design and planning materialize in the form of national/state level policies, city-level development plans, city-level building regulations or outcomes of a judicial proceeding—ll of which culminate in tangible change.

The course: Urban Policy and Regulations: Intent, Manifestation, Design, aimed to understand the competing process of city-making with a specific focus on land markets, public realm, and built form. This was explored in 2 modules at the City and Area level. The studio was based in Mumbai, owing to a long history of planning and design interventions.

320

320

320

Fig 1 321 321

321

Planning UG Level-3

Fig 1 Khushi Jain Free Design, Urban Condition 1 -Isometric and View Fig 2 Zankhna Palmist Free Design, Urban Condition 1 -Plot Growth Fig 3 Zankhna Palmist Constrained Design, Urban Condition 1 -Plot Growth Fig 4 Khushi Jain Free Design, Urban Condition 2 –Isometric Fig 5 Zankhna Palmist Free Design, Urban Condition 1 -Isometric

Faculty of Planning UR3003 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3 322

Fig 6 Kanisha Patel Free Design, Urban Condition 1 -Axonometric Fig 7 Khushi Jain Free Design, Urban Condition 2 –Perspective View Fig 8 Zankhna Palmist Free Design, Urban Condition 1 - Aerial View Fig 9 Kanisha Patel Free Design, Urban Condition 1 - Perspective View Fig 10 Teesta Singh Comparative Matrix, Free Design Vs Constrained Design – Urban Condition 1

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6 323

Planning UG Level-3

Fig 7 Faculty of Planning UR3003 Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

Fig 9

324

Fig 10 325 325

325

326

Varun Doulatani CT3009 MEPF Services, Design and Coordination Shamik Desai, Arpit Malaviya

326

FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY

327

327

CT2012

Deployable Structures: Concepts and Explorations Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistants Umang Lapsiwala Palak Agrawal Faculty of Technology CT2012Monsoon 2021

2nd year Abijith M Anushree Solanki Aswad Kagdi Jay Patel Jenish Kathiriya Mohit Mungre Neel Shah Sahil Tanti Sunay Shah

3rd year Ansh Gupta Harsh Agarwal Moksha Trivedi Shaunak Harsora

Japan Shah

Anand Viswanathan

Deployable structures can expand and contract due to their geometrical arrangement and mechanical joinery in such a way that they can adapt to different usages. They can fold, reduce in size and fit into a limited space when not in use; when required, these structures can be deployed to serve the intended purpose.

This studio emphasized on learning the concept of deployable structures through origami techniques and kinematics of linkages. Students first developed forms using origami techniques and later developed a structural concept out of it based on a specific problem given to each one. Once the concept was formulated, students performed manual as well as softwarebased calculations and did structural analysis to determine member forces, joint forces and sectional sizes. In the final phase of the studio, students made scaled models of structure and the joinery along with basic drawings.

328

328

328

Fig 1

329

329

Fig 2

329

329

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Abijith Name Name M Exploded Caption Assembly view Fig 2deployable and Name Name stages Caption of the ceiling Iris Fig 3 Name Name mechanism ”Unforling Caption Daylight” Fig 2 Harsh Agarwal 3d view, detail of the M-joinery and folding stages of one member of the ”Unfurling Space” Fig 3 Aswad Kagdi Elevation and Isometric view of the ”Portable Heaven”, a deployable space covering.

Fig 4 Neel Shah Different folding stages of the deployable shade ”Chhaaya” Fig 5 Ansh Gupta 3d view and some joinery details of the deployable amphitheatre covering ”Ring Dynamics” Fig 6 Sunay Shah Stages of the retractable arena seating ”Sit and Stair”

Faculty of Technology CT2012 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7 4 Moksha Name Name Trivedi Caption Rendered view of Fig 5deployable the Name Name ”Sunbrella” Caption Caption Caption Fig 8 Mohit Caption Mungre The different folding stages of the portable disaster management shelter ”Padma Chaya” Fig 9 Anushree Solanki Rendered 3d views and cross section of the Deployable Solar roof panel Fig 10 Jenish Kathiriya Stages of the covertable balcony ”Abhayavachana” Fig 11 Shaunak Harsora Views of the ”Half Signal”, a deployable space antenna Fig 12 Sahil Tanti ”Elevacion de Material”, a truck that can transport building material vertically Fig 13 Jay Patel 3d renedered view of the portable deployable shelter

Fig 3

Fig 4 3 Fig

330

330

330

Fig 4 Fig 5

FigFig 5 6

Fig 6

331

Fig 7

331

Fig 7

331

331

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Technology CT2012 Monsoon 2021

Fig 9

Fig 8

Fig 10

332

332

332

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13 333 333

333

CT2019

Planning and Design of road infrastructure in hilly region Focus Analyzing and Designing Unit Assistant Ishita Bhatt

Faculty of Technology CT2019Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Dhruv Patel Hansraj Rathi Kush Patel Nihar Shah Ruchit Patel Shalv Kapadia Shubham Raval

3 rd year Aditya Agrawal Dhruvi Bhatt Divyesh Mehta Jehan Tripathi Rushikumar Patel Shlok Patel

Komal Parikh

Birva Joshi

This studio dealt with the problem of planning and designing a suitable road alignment in hilly regions where natural and built environment effects can be influential. Civil and infrastructure engineering principles and techniques that aid in analyzing and designing of the road route and its pavements were applied for generating a suitable solution. It was identified that a civil engineer equipped with the thorough skill of field survey and understanding for soil properties, for highway and traffic engineering principles and having a certain exposure to the actual reallife road-related problem can be very useful professionally.

The exercises and discussions pertaining to existing roadway and supporting facilities enabled students to propose their own alignment, design its elements and conduct quantity calculations, parametric studies and road safety analysis. Skill-building for visualization and analysis of collected data through advanced mapping techniques like 3D Model, DSM and drive-through video were introduced. To accomplish mentioned tasks, exposure and skill-building was provided by advanced design tools such as Open-Road, Bentley reality modelling, AutoCAD, Google Earth & Q-GIS.

334

334

334

Fig 1 335 335

335

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Rushi NamePatel, NameShalv Caption Kapadia Fig 2 Name Proposed routes Name siteCaption wise Taranga , Idar Fig 3Makhaniyo and Name Name hill Caption Fig 2 Hansraj Rathi Base Map - Idar Fig 3 Shubham Raval LULC Map - dar Fig 4 Dhruv Patel Reconnaissance Survey - Idar Fig 5 Ruchit Patel, Kush Patel Contour and Strahler order - Taranga Fig 6 Dhruvi Bhatt 3d Model from Drone Survey - Makhaniyo Hill

Fig 7 4 Dhruvi Name Name Bhatt Horizontal Caption Alignment Fig 5 NameHill Makhaniyo Name Caption Caption Caption Fig 8 Shlok Caption Patel General Alignment Drawing Makhaniyo Hill Fig 9 Aditya Agrawal Identification of Drainage location Fig 10 Nihar Shah Typical c/s of road way Fig 11 Jehan Tripathi Pavement design Fig 12 Divyesh Mehta Road Safety Plan Fig 13 Jehan Tripathi Drive through Video

Faculty of Technology CT2019 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

336

336

336

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7 337 337

337

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Technology CT2019 Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

338

338

338

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13 339 339

339

CT2024

Geotechnical Parameters: Influencing Foundation Systems Focus Analyzing and Designing Unit Assistants Harshad Parmar Khushi Shah Faculty of Technology CT2024Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Raj Salecha Saumitra Nachane

3 rd year Akshata Patel Dhruvi Shah Preyas Shah Priyam Bhatt Rajvi Shah Renny Somani Shah Sagar Shivbhadrasinh Parmar Siddharth Kabra Uddant Patel Yashraj Patel

Pavni Pandya

Chandresh Solanki

Foundation is a critical part of any civil structure which plays a vital role in the overall safety of a structure. Foundation rests on soil, hence soil plays a crucial role in the foundation design of a structure. Soil, being a natural material; a varied type of soil that is present below the earth’s surface. A good foundation design aims safe, sustainable as well as economical foundation and for that, the information regarding underground soil strata is essential. The behaviour of soil is analyzed based on properties of soil which can be made available with the help of site investigation and field as well as laboratory testing of soil.

During the studio, students got exposed to soil exploration work on site. They went on site to collect the soil samples from the soil borehole.

Several soil tests were performed on soils in the laboratory to define different soil properties and predict soil behaviour. Students did calculations and designed different types of foundations (Shallow and deep).

They also worked to improve the properties of problematic soil by adding admixtures and performed various tests on problematic soil.

Studio enabled students to judiciously choose the best-suited foundation for the structure.

340

340

Fig 1

340

341

1 341

Fig 1

341

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Renny Name Name SomaniCaption Mind Map on Fig 2 Name Standard Penetration Name Caption test Fig 2 3 Akshata Name Name PatelCaption Mind Map on Geotechnical Investigation Planning Fig 3 Renny Somani Mind Map on Grain size Analysis Fig 4 Renny Somani Mind Map Consolidation Test

Fig 5 4 Dhruvi Name Name Shah Mind Caption Map Shear Fig 5 Name Strength Tests Name Caption Caption Caption Fig 6 Akshata Caption Patel Consolidation settlement analysis and calculations Fig 7 Dhruvi Shah Foundation Design Fig 8 Priyam Bhatt Horizantal Soil Profile

Faculty of Technology CT2024 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

Fig 2

342

342

342

Fig 4 343 343

343

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Technology CT2024 Monsoon 2021

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

344

344

344

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9 345 345

345

CT2018

Designing Spaces in Reinforced Concrete

Focus Analyzing and Designing Unit Assistants Meet Shah Tanvi Dubberwar Faculty of Technology CT2018Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Gopalan Awasthi Raghav Ramani

3rd year Aditi Bhatt Aman Patel Chintan Shah Heril Jain Hrithik Lutharia Joy Patel Kinchit Khandelwal Manav Ramani Nihal Patel Poojan Kamdar Smit Borad

Rachit Sheth

Kruti D Shah

Building construction is not only about erecting a concrete mass in a space, but is also about developing a space by effective utilization of it’s area. In today’s times, where every RCC building is different in terms of its shape, form and structural system, an engineer requires to not only analyse and design the building but also understand the process that leads to it’s architectural and structural form. One needs to cultivate the conceptual understanding of it’s architectural design and coherently develop the structural system.

The studio is designed precisely to cultivate this understanding in students— to design a space such that architectural form, space is satisfied without compromising on structural integrity. It aimed at designing a space where architecture and structure are coherent and blend into each other instead of competing and contradicting.

Our goal was to make an engineering student sensitive towards intangible but crucial architectural principles; doing so by appropriate use of engineering concepts & theories of Analysis & RCC design. The students produced a proper execution drawing detail for the site at the end of the semester

346

346

346

Fig 1 347 347

347

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Hrithik Name Name Lutharia Caption Exploded isometric Fig 2 Name drawing of proposed Name Caption flat slab museum Fig 3 Name showing different Nametypologies Caption of column Fig 2 Joy Patel Concept model Fig 3 Joy Patel Concept model Fig 4 Smit Borad Design Development diagrams of proposed museum in Beam column system Fig 5 Nihal Patel Architectural Diagrams of proposed art museum in frame system Fig 6 Chintan Shah Internal view of proposed museum in Beam column system

Faculty of Technology CT2018 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 7 4 Manav Name Name RamaniCaption External view of Fig 5 NameHistory proposed Namemuseum Caption in Caption Beam Caption system column Caption Fig 8 Smit Borad Internal view of proposed Art and Culture museum in frame system Fig 9 Aditi Bhatt Analysis & Design calculations Fig 10 Kinchit, Manav, Chintan, Smit STAAD Pro 3D Model for analysis & design Fig 11 Manav Ramani, Nihal Patel Structural drawings with reinforcement detailing

Fig 3

Fig 3

348

348

348

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8 349 349

349

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Technology CT2018 Monsoon 2021

Fig 9

Fig 10

350

350

350

Fig 11 351 351

351

CT2021

Designing Spaces in Steel

Focus Analyzing and Designing Unit Assistants Nayan Chandaria Pravin Mistry Faculty of Technology CT2021Monsoon 2021

3 rd year Ayush Patel Harshit Kavadia Het Shah Hitarth Goswami Jignesh Solanki Pruthvirajsinh Vaghela Rohit Hundlani Rushi Patel Shaivi Padsala Vatsalkumar Patel Ved Patwa Vrihit Jethva Yash Khorasiya

Rupal Shah

Pankti Pandya

Throughout history, humankind has fabricated all manner of artefacts and structures from available materials found in their local habitats. Vernacular craft skills developed through long traditions of working with familiar materials frequently resulted in the making of beautiful structures that were unique to each location and culture.

The architecture and engineering today is no longer limited by these vernacular constraints.

Science and industry has made available materials with new physical properties that enable the conception of novel architectural forms.

This studio was focused on exploring the potential of steel, perhaps the most remarkable of these industrial materials invented in the late 19th century. Students studied the work of modern masters of architecture and engineering in steel to gain an understanding of how their work depended on a profound understanding of the physical, chemical properties and structural potential of steel. They then progressed to designing their own steel structures through the development of scaled models, sketches, prototype models, structural drawings and 3D models backed up by engineering proof of concept and calculation. The studio challenged student engineers to explore their role in architectural design by creatively applying and calculation to their design expression.

352

352

352

BOOK STAND AND HOLDER

stand comprises of wooden bamboo sticks. It is designed and carried out in such a way that it minance in aesthetics as well as structurally sound. Triangulation between each module is seen res lateral stability of the model. The model can withstand a total load of 25 kg. Additional book rovided at sides that can accommodate A5 diaries and books.

BOOK STAND AND HOLDER BOOK STAND AND HOLDER

BOOK STAND AND HOL Figure1.4Isometric Front view Figure1.5 view with book

Figure1.4 Front view

re1.1 Top view

Figure1.6 Front view with book

Figure1.3 Isometric view

BOOK STAND AND HOLDER BOOK STAND AND HOLDER

JIGNESH SOLANKI UG180232 YASH KHORASIYA UG180688 JIGNESH SOLANKI UG180232 SHAIVI PADSALA Figure1.6 Front view with UG191268 YASH KHORASIYA UG180688

Figure1.7 Design process of a single module Figure1.7 Design process of a single module step- 4 step- 5

024 STEEL DESIGN STUDIO

tep- 2

Figure1.5 Isometric Figure1.6 Front view with view with book book

Figure1.2 Front view

step- 3

JIGNESH SOLANKI

UG180232

CT–2024 STEEL DESIGN STUDIO Figure1.4 Front view Figure1.5 Figure1.4 Isometric Front view YASH Figure1.6 Front Figure1.5 view with Isometric CT–2024 STEEL DESIGN STUDIO KHORASIYA UG180688 view with book

with book SHAIVI PADSALAbookview UG191268

SHAIVI PADSALA

book UG191268

RO

ssion force

Figure1.7 Design process of a single module triangulation liver arm action Figure1.4 Front view

force

single member

CT–2024 STEEL DESIGN STUDIO CT–2024 STEEL

JIGNESH SOLANKI UG180232 DESIGN STUDIO UG180688 YASH KHORASIYA SHAIVI PADSALA UG191268

Figure1.5 Isometric UG180232 view with book UG180688

JIGNESH SOLANKI YASH KHORASIYA SHAIVI PADSALA

UG191268

Given

Site 2 Time As in

2D pa

Then

Fig.1

Figure1.7 Design process of a single module 353

353

353 in 3-D . nd repeated

Figure1.7 Design process of a single module

J

Fig.3 Fig 4 Rohit NameHundlani Name Caption Floor Plans, Section & Fig Exploded 5 Name view Name show Caption the elemets Captionof the structure Caption Caption Fig.4 Vatsal Patel & Het Shah Structural Analysis of Beams, Columns & Staad Hitarth Goswami Model SYMMETRY Fig.5 Rohit, Hitarth, Rushi, Vrihit 3D Visulisations for the final Design A

A

A.0.0

A.0.0

B

B

A.0.0

A.0.0

A.0.0

D

0 MOVEMENT-ACTIVITY

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

GROUND LVL 0.00

A

A

A.0.0

A.0.0

B

A.0.0

ROOF PLAN

3

4

C

A.0.0

4

5(METER)

1

2

3

4

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

C

A.0.0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

-350.00

1 2 3 Fle &0 Foue

SECTION D-D

C

A.0.0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

0

3

4

5(METER)

10

TOP LVL +11264

ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

B

ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

A.0.0

0

1

2

3

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM10 LVL + 5400 5(METER) GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400

SECTION D-D

4

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

0

B

10

SECTION D-D

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00

C

3

4

5(METER)

D

10

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

GROUND LVL 0.00

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

E

SECTION D-D

0

0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

SPACE QUALITY-PLINTH & ROOF F

+8300mm TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

+6800mm +5800mm +5725mm

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391 MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL ++ 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL 8291 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

TRANSPARENCY TRANSPARENCY TRANSPARENCY TRANSPARENCY

SECTION D-D SECTION D-D

1

2

3

4

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM10 LVL + 5400 5(METER) GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

0

1

2

3

4

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

0

SECTION D-D

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

3

5(METER)

5(METER)

10

+4500mm +3075mm +3000mm

10

TOP LVL +11264

A

A.0.0 A.0.0

4

+4575mm

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00

4

3

3

MEZZAMINE 5400 ROOF TRUSSBOTTOM BOTOM LVL LVL ++ 8291

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

0

2

SECTION A-A

TOP LVL +11264

SECTION D-D

1

10

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

A

A.0.0 1 2

TRANSPARENCY

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

A

GROUND LVL 0.00

A

SECTION D-D

A.0.0

4

10

ROOF PLAN

0

A

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL ++ 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL 8291 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

SECTION D-D 10

B

A.0.0

10

MEZZAMINE 5400 ROOF TRUSSBOTTOM BOTOM LVL LVL ++ 8291

ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE A ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE 0

TOP LVL +11264

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

ROOF PLAN-450.00

B

A.0.0

10

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

10

5(METER)

5(METER)

ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

Sections

tree

ROOF PLAN 0.00

4

10

3

2

3

5(METER)

2

1

2

4

C

1

A

A.0.0

B

0

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

ROOF PLAN 0

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM10 LVL + 5400 5(METER) GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

4

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

B

A.0.0

4

3

B

-350.00

A.0.0

3

2

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391 A.0.0

A

A

A.0.0

2

1

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

A.0.0

B

A.0.0

1

2

A

B

A.0.0

1

0

TOP LVL +11264

A.0.0

A.0.0

0

0

Sec ÞoM

0

0

SECTION D-D

-350.00

A.0.0

7

A.0.0

GROUND FLOOR PL

GROUND LVL 0.00 10

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400

SECTION D-D

A

B

5(METER)

ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

SECTION D-D

A

A.0.0

4

Path o t

SECTION D-D

A.0.0

A

3

D

777

A

2

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL ++ 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL 8291 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

EXISTING LIBRARY BUILDING

B

1

ENCLOSURE

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

HIERACHY HIERACHY HIERACHY HIERACHY A.0.0

0

SECTION D-D

ihtot

0.00

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

B

A.0.0

MEZZAMINE 5400 ROOF TRUSSBOTTOM BOTOM LVL LVL ++ 8291

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

-350.00

A.0.0

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400

....3"

ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

C

plinth

10

B

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

A.0.0

Faculty of Technology CT2021 Monsoon 2021

.

5(METER)

TOP LVL +11264

-450.00

A

4

ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

)

3

ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

+

ȾEverchengndspe (KE)

2

TOP LVL +11264

-350.00

ȾoutwardsDace Cakant)s)2

1

A.0.0

gantry

EXISTING LIBRARY BUILDING

-350.00

0

HIERACHY

A.0.0

existing building

ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

10

SECTION D-D

SYMMETRY SYMMETRY SYMMETRY SYMMETRY

TOP LVL +11264

ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

Site

A

A.0.0

1

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Rohit, NameVrihit, NameHarshit, CaptionVed, Shaivi, Jignesh, Fig 2 Name Yash,Het, Name Vatsal Caption Portable reading Fig 3 Name deskName designed Caption using Bamboo Skewers Fig.2 Jignesh Solanki Conceptual diagrams based on Organisation Principles & Roof Design Plans HitarthGoswami Section

+1800mm

A.0.0

+1500mm

TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291 TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

+400mm ±0mm

MEZZAMINE 5400 ROOF TRUSSBOTTOM BOTOM LVL LVL ++ 8291 TOP LVL +11264 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391 MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL + 8291

B

2

3

4

5(METER)

10

SECTION D-D SECTION D-D

2

3

0

1

2

3

C

0

0

1

2

3

4

1

0

2

1

3

2

4

4

3

D

E

F

5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800 5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00

10 4

3

5(METER)

ROOF FORM DIAGRAM

0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

10

10

4

6

5

+8300mm

2 3 1 0

+6800mm

1 2 0

3 4 2 1

1

2

5(METER)

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL ++ 5400 ROOF TRUSS BOTOM LVL 8291 GROUND LVL 0.00 A.0.0 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

MEZZAMINE BOTTOM LVL + 5400 5(METER) 10 GROUND LVL 0.00 GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800

4

10

SECTION D-D

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

1

10

Section AA'

0

10

1

B

SECTION D-D

D

0

B

A

A.0.0

D

A.0.0

A.0.0 A.0.0

4 5(METER) 5(METER) 3 2 4 3 5(METER) 4 5(METER) 10

B

GROUND PLINTH LVL +1800 ROOF BOTOM LVL + 8391

+5800mm

0

0 1

+5725mm

+4575mm +4000mm +3900mm

A

+3075mm +3000mm

A.0.0

A

+1800mm

A.0.0

A

+600mm

A.0.0

A

+450mm +300mm ±0mm

A.0.0

Fig.2

B

A.0.0

2

1

3

4

5

6

B

A.0.0

354

B

A.0.0

B

A.0.0

354

ROOF FORM DIAGRAM ROOF FORM DIAGRAM ROOF FORM DIAGRAM ROOF FORM DIAGRAM

Section BB'

0 1000

0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

0

1

2

3

4

5(METER)

0 0

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5(METER) 5(METER)

3000

6000mm

10 10 10 10

354

B

N n B

C

B

LIBRARY LIBRARY DESIGN DESIGN Form Form Exploration Exploration

C

D

E

F

C

Z B

C

W

A

A

B

B

C

C

C

D

D

E

E

B

C

W

A

A

B

B

C

C

D

D

4000 LVL. +6800 (PEAK POINT)

1

8

STEP 4 0.00

6

STEP 3 -300

4

STEP 2 -600

E

8

STEP 4 0.00

6

STEP 3 -300

4

STEP 2 -600

2

STEP 1 -900

8

STEP 4 0.00

STEP 4 0.00 STEP 3 -300

6

STEP 3 -300

4

STEP 2 -600

OPEN SPACE STEP 2 4 -1200 -600

2

STEP 1 -900

8 7 5

8

STEP DOWN -225 STEP DOWN -450

7

STEP DOWN -225

5

STEP DOWN -450

OPEN SPACE -1200

C

C

STEP DOWN -225 STEP DOWN -450

B

B

B

B

3

SITTING -750

3

SITTING -750

C

F

C

W

W

1

1

1

1

1

1

A

A

2

2

Q

Q

2

2

Q

Q

1

8

STEP 4 +450

C 8

STEP 4 +450

6

STEP 3 +150

6

STEP 3 +150

4

STEP 2 -150

4

STEP 2 -150

2

STEP 1 -450

2

STEP 1 -450

8

STEP 4 +450

8

STEP 4 +450

6

STEP 3 +150

6

STEP 3 +150

4

STEP 2 -150

2

STEP 1 -450

1 4 2

1

OPEN SPACE -750

C

F

1

OPEN SPACE -750

STEP 1 -450

4000

3

4000 4904

4904 P

A

P

A

B

7000 5568

Q

B

4000

Q

C

A

P

4000

A

R

4896

B

Q

Q

4

STEP 2 -150

2

STEP 1 -450

4904

C

D

4000

R

D

4000

STEP25622 DOWN

E

8

PLINTH 0.00

8

PLINTH 0.00

5

GROUND LVL -450

8

PLINTH 0.00

8

PLINTH 0.00

5

GROUND LVL -450

5

Q

GROUND LVL -450

4 3

4 3

R

R

4

4

5

5

3

STEP 4 +450

8

E

4896

F

4904

9C

LANDING +1030 D

R

3

E

10

MEZZANINE +2400

10

MEZZANINE +2400

7000

F

5

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

5

1

2

21

A

A'

A'

Q

3

3

R

R

P

4

STEP 2 -150

2

STEP 1 -450

10

22

3

1

3

3

R

R

3

10

OPEN SPACE -750

A'

MEZZANINE +2400

Q

W

W

Z

Z

P

A

P

A

Q

Q

C

R

C

R

F

6

6

6

6

F

5

W

W

OPEN SPACE -750

F

A' 8

6

PLINTH 0.00

5

Q

GROUND LVL -450

3

W

W

Z

Z

P

A

P

A

Q

C' Q

C

B' R

C

ROOF PLAN (GF)

B'

R

F

F

W

W

Z

A

BX

BY

UP

UP C'

B'

GF PLAN GF(+1800) PLAN (+1800)

C

D

E

C

F

5

STUDIO: STUDIO:

FORMAL -450

C'

C'

B'

NAME: ROHITNAME: HUNDLANI ROHIT HUNDLANI CODE: UG191121 CODE: UG191121

NAME: ROHITNAME: HUNDLANI ROHIT HUNDLANI CODE: UG191121 CODE: UG191121

LVL. +6800 (PEAK POINT) DESIGNING DESIGNING SPACES IN SPACES STEEL IN STEEL Faculty of Technology Faculty of Technology

SECTION AA ' 4

3 NOTES: NOTES: ALL THE -DIMENSIONS ALL THE DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM. ARE IN MM. GROUND-LEVEL GROUND AT [LVL. LEVEL 0.00]AT [LVL. 0.00]

CEPT UNIVERSITY CEPT UNIVERSITY

GROUND LVL 0.00

B'

10000

2500 1000

Z

25005000 MM5000 MM P

EXERCISE:EXERCISE:

3

NORTH

EXERCISE:EXERCISE:

1

NORTH

PLINTH 0.00

5

GROUND LVL -450

3

NORTH SHEET NO SHEET NO DRAWING TITLE: DRAWING TITLE:

MEZZANINE MEZZANINE PLAN (+4950) PLAN (+4950) LIBRARY DESIGN LIBRARY DESIGN

0

1

10000

2500 1000

PLANS

PLANS

25005000 MM5000 MM

Scale: 1:75 Scale: 1:75 A

NORTH SHEET NO SHEET NO DRAWING TITLE: DRAWING TITLE:

1

LIBRARY DESIGN LIBRARY DESIGN

7000

8

L

NOTES: NOTES: ALL THE -DIMENSIONS ALL THE DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM. ARE IN MM. R GROUND-LEVEL GROUND AT [LVL. LEVEL 0.00]AT [LVL. 0.00]

0

8

CEPT UNIVERSITY CEPT UNIVERSITY

STUDIO: STUDIO:

W

F

R

B'

MEZZANINE MEZZANINE PLAN (+4950) PLAN (+4950)

GF PLAN GF (+1800) PLAN (+1800)Faculty of Technology STEP DOWN DESIGNING DESIGNING SPACES IN SPACES STEEL IN STEEL 0.00 Faculty 5of Technology

6

3

W

C'

GROUND LVL 0.00

4

MEZZANINE +2400

R 8

Z

Z

A'

GROUND LVL -450

1

C' F

F

5

5

3

4904

E

E

4

B' D

D

Q

25622

B' R

C

1

0.00

C

Y

1

1

STEP 3 +150

6

2

4904

7000

4896

X

P

A' Q

3

2

Q

C' B

3

Q

7000

4896

7000 5568

5 P

STEP DOWN 0.00

FORMAL -450

25622

4000

5568

C' Z

4000

25622

LVL. -1200 (STEP-DOWN) 5054

5

A

F

LANDING +1030

4000

5568

SITTING -750

LVL. -450 (STEP-DOWN) LVL. -750 (SITTING) 5054

FORMAL -450

STEP DOWN 0.00

1

A'

1

SITTING -750

UP

4000

5054

5

5

1

2

7000

4000

4904 4896

4904 4896

9 SITTING -750

5

INFORMAL -1200

LVL. 0.00 (GROUND)

5054

3

R

UP

Z

FORMAL -450

GROUND LVL 0.00

4000

Z

FORMAL -450

5

W

Z

P

1

UP

4000

1

3

R

1 5

P

1

LANDING +1030

SITTING -750

UP

INFORMAL -1200

9

7000

8

Z

P

7000

5054

5568

5568

25622

4000 5568

4000 5568

25622

4896 4000

4896 4000

GROUND LVL 0.00

F

STEP DOWN 0.00

LANDING +1030

UP

1

3

6

5

OPEN SPACE -750

UP

INFORMAL -1200

3

6

STEP DOWN 0.00

1

UP

3

STEP 3 +150

UP

8

INFORMAL -1200

STEP 4 +450

6

Z

B

C 8

UP

6

1

SITTING -750

UP

5

6

INFORMAL -1200

3

1

5

F

B

Z

LANDING +1030

P

SITTING -750

3

9

Z

C

UP

5

LANDING +1030

F

A

OPEN SPACE STEP 2 -750-150

INFORMAL -1200

GROUND LVL 0.00

4000

25622

5

1

LVL. +2570 (GF ROOF) [LOWEST POINT] 1

4

5

Z

C

P

Z

P

1

W

1

9

8

LVL. +2400 (MEZZANINE)

4

OPEN SPACE -1200

SITTING -750

5

GROUND LVL 0.00

4 3

STEP DOWN -225 STEP DOWN -450

A

P

1

P

Z

INFORMAL -1200

GROUND LVL 0.00

7

SITTING -750

3

INFORMAL -1200

LVL. 4820 (GF ROOF) 4000 [HIGHEST POINT] 1

5

A

UP

8

7 3

Z

P

UP

4 3

STEP DOWN -225 STEP DOWN -450

F

INFORMAL -1200

9

OPEN SPACE -1200

8

OPEN SPACE -1200

7 5

1

3

25622

1

W

UP

1

STEP 1 -900

2

1

2

3

1

W

5054

8

F

4000 1

GROUND LVL 0.00

4000

2

STEP DOWN -225 STEP DOWN -450

8

P

E

GROUND LVL 0.00

7 5

INFORMAL -1200

GROUND LVL 0.00

4000

2

A

8

Z

UP

A

A

OPEN SPACE -1200

UP

A

4000

E

GROUND LVL 0.00

F

4000

1

GROUND LVL 2 0.00

4000

STEP 1 -900

6

1

1

4000

2

8

5054

5054

D

Z

UP

1

C

F

C

4000 W

B

F

B

UP

W

1

A C

C

Floor Floor Plans Plans

1

W

B

B

C

B

C

1

PLANS

A' 10

MEZZANINE +2400

Q

R

PLANS

Scale: 1:75 Scale: 1:75 3

5

3

4

FORMAL -450

R

3

5

SITTING -750

10

MEZZANINE +2400

UP

7000

UP

L

LVL. +3350 (RAILING)

5

LVL. +2400 (MEZZANINE)

SITTING -750

6

6

6

6

6

UP

UP

3

4000

7000 5568

4000

ROOF PLAN (MEZZANINE)

LVL. +1030 (LANDING)

4896

4904

Z

P

Q

LVL. 0.00 (GROUND)

STUDIO:

LVL. -1200 (STEP-DOWN) B

Q

C

R

D

4000

E

R

F

F

6

6

W

Z

P

A

Q

Z

P

A

Q

NAME: ROHIT HUNDLANI CODE: UG191121

DESIGNING SPACES IN STEEL C

R

C

R

Faculty of Technology CEPT UNIVERSITY

W

0

B'

C'

LVL. -450 (STEP-DOWN)

25622

C

1000

NOTES: ALL THE DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM. 6 GROUND LEVEL AT [LVL. 0.00] F

2500

5000

EXPLODED VIEW EXERCISE: C LIBRARY DESIGN

W

7000 5568

4000

4896

4904

25622

C' B

B'

Q

C

R

D

E

F

SECTION BB' W

C'

B' F

Fig.3 W

A

C'

B'

C'

B'

MEZZANINE PLAN (+4950)

355

Faculty of Technology CEPT UNIVERSITY

NOTES: ALL THE DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM. LVL. +2270 (GF ROOF) GROUND LEVEL AT [LVL. 0.00] [HEAD ROOM]

EXERCISE:

MEZZANINE LIBRARY DESIGN

NORTH

PLAN (+4950)

SHEET NO

0

1000

2500

DRAWING TITLE:

1000

PLANS

2500

355

5000 MM

5000 MM

355

NAME: ROHIT HUNDLANI CODE: UG191121

0

4

1300

T1

C17

1300

1300

B8

B8

1100

B4

A

6

5

1000 1000 1000

B4

1300

1300

1300

T2

C18

2

4

3

6

5

1100 B4

B8

3

C19

Column through

B4

2

1

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

1100

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

B8

Column stops here

A

Column starts here Bracket

3900

P1

P1

P1

P1

P1

P1

1000

2000

5000 B17 B14

C21

P9

P10

B15

2900

B14

P8 C11

1300

1300

1300

1

Roof Plate 1 (+4600mm)

5

C

6

2

3

4

1400

T1

B4

4200

P4

P4

P4

P4

1300

5

1300

1300

3900 3900

T2

1300

B4

P1 P1

C5

T2 B4

1400

E

B7 B4

1100

B7

4

P1

P1

C4

T1

B4

1400

3

P1

P1

P1

P1

B6

P1

P1

C3

F

B7

F

B7

C5

1000 1000 1000

2

P1

P1 B5 C4

B7

B7

C9

B2

B1

P1

B5 C3

T1

B2

B1

C8

E

B4

1300

1100

P3 P2

E

P1

P3

P2 B8

B4

1300

C9

P1

P1

P1

P1

B1

C2

T2

B4

1300

C8

B8

P1 B6

P1

P1

P1 P1

P1

P1 C1

B8

B4

B8

1100

P1

P1

3900

T2

3900

B4

B2

1100

B1

C7

C13

D 8

B

P1

B15

2900

P4

B4

3000

T1

P4

P4

P4

P4

P4

B7

B16

P3

00 58 P4

P4

B7

P4

P4

T1

C20

9

F

B2

C6

B3

C12

P10

B17

1000

B

P4

9

B8

E

7800

P5

B

0 B1

B

B4

13

P6

P5

P5

3000

9

B

D

00

C

D

B

C14

P6

P6

P9

P5

C

P6

P8

P5

B8

1100

P6

P7

1

C13

B5

7800

C11

1

44

P2

B

B1

B3

C22

C12

P5

2900

B3

C10

B1 P6

B14

B

P5

4900

B8

0

B1

1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

C16

9

1100

D

P6

P6

10

B2

C15

B8

B

C

12

B

B

B1

C14

B

2000

4000

P1

P1

P1

P1

P1

P1

B3

2900

P1

P7

B14

1000

B16 B17

B16 B17

B17

P5

Faculty of Technology CT2021 Monsoon 2021

C23

B14

B16

1000

B2

T2

B1

B4

B6

B3

4900

P1

Manually calculated

F

B4

1300

1300

1100

6

Roof Plate 2 (+5800mm)

Fig.4

356

356

356

Fig.5 357 357

357

CT2023

Expoloring The Indigenous Construction Techniques and Reinterpreting Them in The Modern Context Focus Analyzing and Designing Unit Assistant Sukhdevsinh Parmar Vihangraj vyas Faculty of Technology CT2023Monsoon 2021

2 nd year Maharshi Patel Rohan Singh Rajput

3 rd year Jaimin Tank Madhuvanthi S Rushikesh Patel Tanya Shah Ushi Patel Vedant Patel Vishesh Joshi

Sidhharth Srivastava

Anand Panchal

The studio focused on imparting an understanding of vernacular construction systems of three different regions in India using locally available materials. Students designed a small workspace for craftspersons making critical improvisations in the existing vernacular construction systems to make it suitable for modern requirements.

Vernacular construction systems are inherently cross-disciplinary, as its practitioners are trained to think about the process of making as an overall derivative of material properties, spatial utility, idiosyncrasies as well as climate, all at the same time. This stands in contrast with a compartmentalized approach, often evident in contemporary approaches in practice and pedagogy. Thus, looking towards the vernacular methods of construction can create a fecund ground to achieve the above-mentioned understanding. Students looked at the works of some master builders who have successfully blurred the boundaries between architecture and engineering such as Geoffery Bawa in Sri Lanka, Hassan Fathy in Egypt, Didi Contractor, and Chitra Vishwanath in India.

358

358

358

Fig 1

Fig 2 359 359

359

Design UG Level-2

Name Name Caption Fig 1 Maharshi Patel Physical model of a Fig 2 Name Name Bamboo Case StudyCaption in Surendranagar.

3 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Maharshi Patel Sketches showing a bamboo joinery from different directions.

Fig 3 Maharshi Patel Hand Drafted section of the case study.

Fig 4 Maharshi Patel Sketches of different junctions of the case study.

Fig 5 Tanya Shah Hand Drafted wall section of a Rammed Earth building in Ahmedabad.

Fig 6 Vishesh Joshi Steel Joinery deatil for multiple connections of Bamboo at a junction.

Fig 4 Name Name 7 Vishesh Joshi Caption Mud wall at 1:10 scale 5 Name NameRammed Caption Earth Caption Fig 8 Tanya Shah wall Caption Caption exploration at 1:10 scale.

Fig 9 Vedant Patel Making Dry mixture of Rammed Earth model.

Fig 10 Maharshi Patel Random rubble stone wall at 1:10 scale.

Fig 11 Maharshi Patel Catenary model.

Fig 12 Maharshi Patel Caatenary model using POP bandages.

Fig 13 Maharshi Patel 3D model of studio design.

Fig 14 Group Students working on 1:10 scale model .

Faculty of Technology CT2023 Monsoon 2021

Fig 3

Fig 4

360

360

360

Detail A

Detail A

Fig 5 361 361

361

Design UG Level-2

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Technology CT2023 Monsoon 2021

Fig 6

Scanned by TapScanner Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

362

362

362

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14

363 363

363

CT3008

Waste Management Through Application In Construction Focus Constructing and Specifying Unit Assistant Shivam Soni Dhruvi Swami Faculty of Technology CT3008Monsoon 2021

4th year Bhavadip Bodar Harshil Chauhan Jayraj Boghani Manan Soni Tapan Patel Vinit Changlani Yash Mistry Yogi V Soni

5 th year Anjan Parekh Kavit Patel Krupansh Patel Shashvat Dave

Bhargav Tewar

Nikunj Dave

Anjanee Patel

With the current pace of modernization and industrial development, there has been a tremendous increase in waste generation in the last two decades. Wastes are generated in many industries such as construction, agriculture, manufacturing, packaging etc. These wastes such as slag, bagasse, rice husk, glass, waste tyre, fly ash etc. are potential hazards to the environment. Fine dust size particles pollute the air and other pollutants make their way into the ground water through leachates from landfills.

The biggest concern is about the accumulation and disposal of these wastes.

This studio aimed at developing the process of using waste/byproducts in construction which will lead to comparatively greener construction materials. Students had an opportunity to explore specific industrial waste and study its composition and possible usage in construction. This was carried out with a definite process of detailed study of waste, its effect on environment, possibility in usage in construction, development of prototype of any material with different proportions of waste and detailed study of properties of developed product. Students were exposed to in-depth analysis of the effect of waste on the environment, probable use of waste in construction products, and the performance of waste made construction products against regular, available materials.

364

364

364

Saw Mill Waste

Corn Stalk

Livestock Waste

Burnt Oil

Gloves

Sludge

Concrete /Bricks

Autoinjectors

PVC: Pipes, Wires, cables

PET: Bottles/ Food Package

Plastic Industry

Metal

Sand Aggregates

Electrical Wires Asphalt

Thermal/ Nuclear Power Plant

Liquid Waste

Emulsions

Exploring Industrial waste

Metal Industry

Iron/ Steel making Slags

Liquid Waste Radioactive Waste Zeolite

Solid Waste

Tyre Derived Fuel Tyre

Dyed Water Sodium Silicate Plastic & Paper Yarn

Textile/ Ceramic Industry

Dust & Sludge

Blast Furnace Slag

Granulated Slag

Ground Rubber/ Dry Rubber

Fly Ash

Porcelain

Gravel/ Stone

Pelletized/ Expanded Slag

Insulation Foam, DVD cases

Gaseous Waste

Stone Dust

Base Cement Bags Plate

Polystyrene HDPE: Shower Gel Bottles

Maize Stover

Construction Industry

Ceramics / Tiles

Inhalers

Vegetable Residues

Sugarcane Molasses

Unused Medicines

Contaminated Solvents

Gloves

Banana Stalk Jute

Test Strips

Nebulizer

Rice Husk

Sisal

Pharmaceutical Creams & Industry Ointments

Groundnut Shell

Wheat Straw

Agriculture Industry

Cotton Stalk

Pesticides/ Herbicides

Masks

Coconut Shells

Coconut Fibers

Rubber Industry

Air Cooled Slag

Natural Rubber Latex: Liquid and Solid Latex Waste Fabric/Fiber Ceramic Waste Powder

Ceramic Cyclone Dust Fig 1 365 365

365

Design UG Level-3 Faculty of Technology CT3008 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Group Work Identification of wastes produced by different Industry and their disposal and reusability scenarios.

Fig 2 Krupansh Patel &Vinit Changlani Treatment of subgrade soil with ricehusk and use of rubber tyre waste in bitumen for road construction.

Fig 3 Anjan Parekh Insulation material made out of cotton industry waste.

Fig 4 Kavit Patel Protection screens for construction sites.

Fig 5 Yogi Soni Paver blocks made with construction and demolition waste.

Fig 6 Group Work Replacement of TMT bars by using different waste materials like PET waste (fibers), Jute fibres, banana fibers and bamboo.

Fig 7 Shashwat Dave Dry cladding panels made out of the waste of banana fibers and coconut shells, which can be used for cladding.

Fig 8 Tapan Patel Roofing sheets made out of plastic waste (HDPE)

Fig 3 366

Fig 9 Bhavadip Bodar Precast compound wall blocks made with waste plastic (HDPE). The figure represents the tongue and groove joinery mechanism for the precast panels.

Fig 10 Harshil Chauhan Insulation panel made out of waste of wheat straw along with different binders. The figure shows a sandwich panel, with cement sheets on both the sides of Agro panel.

Fig 11 Jayraj Boghani Replacement of wooden I-girders (Peri, Doka) used for formwork. The I-girders are made with plastic waste (HDPE) Fig 12 Manan Soni Replacement of Ceramic tiles with waste plastic tiles.

Fig 13 Yash Mistry Replacement of aluminium frame structure, used for false ceiling. The frame work is made out of PET fibre and waste plastic (HDPE). Other images are of the processes during the making of the products

Insulation material

Safety Barrier

Material: Textile Cotton Waste

Using Recycled HDPE Plastic

Fig3

Fly ash

Fig 3

C & D Waste

Phosphogypsum

Fig 4

Fig4

GGBS

Paver Blocks

Fig 5

Pag 4

367 367

367

Design UG Level-3 Faculty of Technology CT3008 Monsoon 2021

Reinforcement Bars PET, Jute & Banana Fibres, Bamboo

Fig 6

Corrugated Roofing Sheets Material: Waste HDPE Plastic

Fig 8 368

Fig 7

Dry Cladding Panel Coconut shell, Banana Fibres, Resin Fig 7

Precast Interlocking Wall Panel Material: Recycled HDPE Waste

Fig 9

Agro panel Material: Wheat Straw & SH fevicol

Floor Tiles Material Used: Waste HDPE Plastic

I-Girders Material: HDPE Waste Plastic

Eco- False Ceiling Framework Recycled HDPE Waste & PET Fibres 369

Page 6 369

369

CT3011

Engineering Sustainability: Impact of Design, Material and Technologies Unit Assistant Jay Darji Jeel Chaudhary

Faculty of Technology CT3011Monsoon 2021

4 th year Abhishek Bhatt Ahan Pujari Anuj Vagadiya Brijesh Pandya Chinansukh Chandra Mahek Vadgama Nidhi Patel Stuti Patel Tanishq Jain Tavishi Raval Vikas Patel Yashashvi Agrawal

Dhawal Mistry

Varun Yadav

India is the second fastest growing economy in the world and within India, the construction industry is the second largest after agriculture. Real estate development is one of the most energy and resource intensive sectors in India. Real estate sector represents a large percentage of overall energy consumption, and contributes 40% of the carbon emissions driving climate change. Yet buildings also offer opportunities for substantial, economical energy efficiency gains.

From retrofit projects to new construction, buildings require a context-specific design process that integrates efficiency strategies and technologies. In this course, students were introduced to basic technologies and analytical techniques for designing data driven resource-efficient buildings.

The primary focus of this course was upon studying the thermal and luminous behavior of buildings and enhanced performance. The studio aimed to examine the basic scientific principles underlying these phenomena, and use computer-aided design software and climate data to explore the role light, ventilation and energy can play in shaping architecture.

The students were exposed to concepts of passive architecture, embodied energy and carbon, minimizing energy and water consumption by optimal design.

370

370

370

Fig 1 371 371

371

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 All Students Work External CFD Analysis Of Proposed an Existing Dwellings.

Fig 2 Vikas Patel IES Isometric Model Of Exisiting Dwelling Fig 3 Nidhi Patel IES Isometric Model Of Existing Dwelling Fig 4 Vikas Patel Solar Radiation Diagrams Of Proposed Dwelling Fig 5 All Students Work Daylight Analysis Diagrams Of Existing And Proposed Case Fig 6 Tavishi Raval Form Iterations For Dwelling in Srinagar

Faculty of Technology CT3011 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3 372

Fig 7 Anuj Vagadiya Orientation Iterations For Dwelling in Shillong Fig 8 Tanishq Jain Form Iterations For Dwelling In Srinagar Fig 9 Ahan Pujari Form Iterations For Dwelling In Srinagar Fig 10 Tavishi Raval Render Views Of Dwelling In Srinagar Fig 11 Ahan Pujari- Render Views Of Dwelling In Srinagar Fig 12 Tanishq Jain Render Views Of Dwelling In Shillong

Fig 4

Fig 5 373 373

373

Design UG Level-3

Faculty of Technology CT3011 Monsoon 2021

Fig 6

Fig 7

374

Fig 9

Fig 8

Fig 10

Fig 11 West Elevation

East Elevation

Fig 12

375

CT3012

Project Procurement Management

Unit Assistant Mehar Kalra

Faculty of Technology CT3012Monsoon 2021

4 th year Aanchal Arora Devarsh Patel Devarsh Shah Gaurav Goyal Kathan Patel Nikharkumar Desai Rushil Modh Samved Patel Shree Patel

5 th year Abhi Shah Dhruv Patel Jugal Shah

Reshma Shah

Maulik Shah

Increased complexity, uncertainty and pressures of deadlines in construction projects have increased the need for collaboration and coordination among different project actors. Establishing an appropriate procurement strategy and formation of contracts at the outset, is key to a successful outcome of collaboration.

A holistic and systematic approach is crucial to focus on issues such as speed, cost, quality, specific project constraints, risks, assets ownership, financing and program.

The success of the contract management is influenced by considerations during every stage of the procurement process. Hence developing procurement routes and bidding systems are an incredibly important part of the construction project. Each of these elements should be planned, assessed, evaluated and incorporated into the bid formation as required for successful completion of the project. Strategically it is equally desirable for contractors to be equipped with a toolkit that needs to be accessed to formulate winning proposals. The important stages in the flow of the procurement process and the set of procedures necessary for completion of a project were explored in detail for public procurement.

376

376

376

Understanding Selected Project, Understanding Bid Processes, Evaluation Parameters of Consultant.

Ex. Session By Snehal Sir

Week 2 BID Team Formulation and Planning.

Week 4

Study of GCC, Comparison of GCC Clauses

Week 6 Bid Evaluation Criteria Preparation of Bid Document

Week 8

Week 1

Week 3

Week 5

Week 7

Understanding Project and Formulation of Project Requirements.

Market Survey, Development of Procurement Route,

Exploring Methods of Biding and Bidding System Ex. Session By Suren Sir

Study of ITB, Comparison of ITB Clauses

Week 9 Week 9

Technical Specification & Technical BidSpecification Drawings & BidBy Drawings Ex. Session Mr. Chintan Desai Ex. Session By Mr. Chintan Desai

Mid Semester Review

By Jurors Mr. Snehal Shah Mr. Yogesh Pathak

Week 13 Week 13

Week 11 Week 11

Week 10 Contract Agreement and Price BID Format for various types of Contract

Week 15 Week 15

Pre- BID Queries and PreBID Queries and Bidding Strategy Bidding Strategy

Contractor’s Bidding Toolkit Contractor’s Expert Bidding Session Toolkit by Expert SessionVyas by Adv. Udayan Adv. Udayan Vyas

BID Opening Evaluation BIDand Opening Evaluation Finalization of and Finalization of successful Bidders successful Bidders

End Semester End Semester Review Review

Week 12

Week 14

Week 16

BID/ NO-BID Decision

BID Strategy

Portfolio Preparation

Fig 1

DETAIL OF SIMILAR PROJECTS NEW PARLIAMNET BUILDING (DELHI)

JHARKHAND VIDHAN SABHA & SECRETARIAT

• • • • • •

• Completion Date: 2019 • Location: Ranchi, Jharkhand

Completion Date: Proposed to complete in 2022 Location: Delhi

• Site Area: 39 Acres • Client: Greater Ranchi Development Agency Limited • Project Cost : Rs. 465 Crores

Site Area: 9.5 Acres Client: Central Public Work Department (CPWD) Project Cost : Rs. 861 Crores Capacity: 1272 Seats

• Cost/Seat: Rs. 68,00,000/• Type of Contact : Item Rate Contract • Design Consultant: HCP Design, Planning and Management Pvt. Ltd. • Contract Awarded: Tata Projects Ltd. • Funding: Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (MoHUA), Govt. of India

MADHYA PRADESH SECRETARIAT BUILDING • • • •

Capacity: 162 Seats Cost/Seat: Rs. 2,87,00,000/Type of Contact : EPC Contract Design Consultant: ENARCH Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Contract Awarded: RKS Construction Pvt Ltd

• Funding: Jharkhand State Government (50%) & Govt of India (50%)

GUJARAT VIDHAN SABHA & SECRETARIAT

Completion Date: 2018 Location: Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Site Area: 25 Acres Client: Environmental Planning & Coordination Organization (EPCO)

• Project Cost : Rs. 431.75 Crores • Type of Contact : Item Rate Contract • • • •

• • • • •

• • • • •

Completion Date: 2017 Location: Gandhinagar, Gujarat Site Area: 20 Acres Client: Roads And Building Department, Govt. Of Gujarat Project Cost : Rs. 338 Crores (121+217 Crores)

• Capacity: 210 Seats • Cost/Seat: Rs. 58,00,000/• Type of Contact : Lumpsum Contract

Design Consultant: CP Kukreja Architects Contract Awarded: Shapoorji Pallonji Company Ltd. Funding: Madhya Pradesh State Government Scope: Vindhyanchal Bhawan and Satpura Bhawan on either sides, embraces the modern architecture of the Vallabh Bhawan Secretariat.

• Design Consultant: HCP Design, Planning and Management Pvt. Ltd. • Contract Awarded: PSP Projects Ltd. • Funding: Gujarat State Government

FEATURES OF PROPOSED PROJECT CCS BUILDINGS (COMMON CENTRAL SECRETARIAT) 1.

2.

3.

4.

CSS Buildings 1,2 & 3 will be built in plot no. 137 occupied by present IGNCA building.

CSS Buildings 4,5 & 9 will be built at location of of Shastri, Krishi, Udyog and Nirman Bhawan.

CSS Buildings 6,7 & 8 will be dedicated as Defence Enclave.

CSS Building 10

Common Central Secretariat Building No. 1,2 & 3 Plot Area: 26.1 Acres (1,05,562.3 Sqm) Plot No. 137

Permissible Ground Coverage (52,781 Sqm) No. of Floor 2B+G+6

Maximum Height: 39m

Total Built up Area: 4,57,550 Sqm. Estimated Project Cost: Rs. 32,54,90,27,591/- Crores.

Civil & Horticulture Rs. 20,21,14,03,154/-

Electrical & Mechanical Rs. 10,70,52,97,894/-

Operation & maintenance for 5 years Rs. 1,63,23,26,543/-

Fig 2 377 377

377

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Gaurav Goyal Studio Timeline Fig 2 Devarsh Shah Details of Similar Projects & Proposed Project Features Fig 3 Samved Patel Proposed Project & It’s Family Tree Fig 4 Aanchal Arora Proposed Procurement Route & Evaluation Criteria of Consultants Fig 5 Rushil Modh Types of Contract & Proposed Contents of ITB

Fig 6 Kathan Patel Nikhar Desai Contents of Bid Fig 7 Devarsh Patel Contents of GCC Fig 8 Jugal Shah Go / No Go Checklist Fig 9 Abhi Shah Screening Criteria Fig 10 Shree Patel Dhruv Patel Scoring Matrix Fig 11 Devarsh Shah Price Bid Fig 12 Samved Patel Comparison of Price Proposal for Bidders

Mumbai Metro Rail Project MUMBAI

MUMBAI METRO & RAIL NETWORK

TRANSPORTATION MAP

Faculty of Technology CT3012 Monsoon 2021

Mumbai

Figure 1 – Map of India highlighting Mumbai

Figure 2 – Map of Mumbai showing path of major

Figure 3 – Map of Mumbai showing Metro & Railway Network

transportation

PLAN - Mumbai Metro Rail Project was one of the centrally sponsored “Mega City Scheme” launched by Government of India and approved by Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao and Ministry of Railways in 8th Five-year Plan (1992-97) for 8th, 9th and 10th but discontinued in 11th Five-year Plan. (Clause 9.1.13 Mass Rapid Transport/ Transportation/ Volume-2 Regional Plan for Development) - Total 356.972 kilometers and serviced by 286 stations is being planned for over a 15-year period till October 2026 connecting all comprise fourteen high-capacity metro railway lines and one metro-lite line.

Fig 3

378

Quality & Cost based Selection (QCBS)

Sr. No.

Least cost Selection (LCS)

Fee Based Selection (FBS)

Quality Based Selection (QCS)

Single Source Selection (SSS)

Parameter (Selection of General Consultant (GC) for Chennai Metro Rail)

Consultant Qualification Based Selection (CQS)

Maximum Marks

1)

Past experience of the consultant Metro/sub-urban /urban/ MRTS railway Projects:

40

2)

Substantial completion of similar projects:

30

3)

In the case of JV/Consortium, each member of the JV/Consortium should have received 25 crores in last 10 years (till 31.03.2021) in similar project.

10

4a)

Organization and Staffing (Company profile) - 1 page per JV/Consortium member

2.5

4b)

Number of years of experience of Lead Member as Consultant (in any field)

2.5

5)

Overall financial strength of the consultant:

15

Total Marks (Minimum marks required for qualification: 70)

100

Fig 4

TYPES OF CONTRACTS

Learning Outcome of Problem Statement 1

Competitive Bidding Contract

Negotiated Cost Plus Contract

Hybrid Contract

Public – Private Partnership

Lump Sum Contract Unit Price Contract Percentage Rate Contract

Cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) Cost-plus-incentive fee (CPIF) Cost-plus-award fee (CPAF)

Engineering, Procurement, Construction (EPC) Contract

Design, Build, Finance, Operate & Transfer (DBFOT) Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) Design, Build, Transfer (DBT)

Fig 5

Commencement of Works

Advance Payments

Time for Completion

Schedule of Payments Performance Guarantee Delay in Payments Release of Retention Money

Commencement, Delays & Suspensions

Contract Price & Payments

Fig 6 The Contract Price

Litigation Arbitration

Variation & Adjustments

Dispute Resolution & Arbitration

Mediation

Extension of Time for completion Suspension of Works Compensation of Delay

Final Statement & Completions

Conciliation

Milestones Submission of Programme

Deviation & Implication of deviations Additional Time for Variation Extra Item Payments

Fig 7 379

Design UG Level-3

S.No.

Description

1) The Project

GO/ NO GO CHECKLIST PREPARED BY CONTRACTORS (LEARNING OUTCOME FOR PROBLEM STATEMENT 2) Decision Conditions for Marking Yes No Positive Neutral Negative 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ✅ ❎

1.1 Project Scope of Work well defined?

Key aspects from which we stand 1.2 apart from competitors Familiarity with applicable 1.3 regulations and technologies 2) The Client Past experience and future opportunity with the Authority Do client make payment promptly 2.2 and what are Payment methods aadopted Is client realistic about schedule and 2.3 budget 3) Organisation Information 2.1

Faculty of Technology CT3012 Monsoon 2021

3.1

Do we have the required resources for the project

3.2

Have we done the work under same type of contract

3.3 Need a JV for execution of the work 4) Market/Competitor Information

4.1

Information about the competetive bidders in the market

Do contractor have a strong 4.2 background that will differentiate from the competitors Will winning enhance our reputation 4.3 and market positioning Total

Fig 8

Fig 9 380

0

Yes, each parameters well Need clarification and change defined Adoption of advance Lack of resources due to handling more than one project technology Lack of resources & need to hire Sufficient number of TBM's specified diameter of TBM (Project (Project Specific exampe) Specific exampe)

No, Important parameters not mentioned

Has done more than 3 Has done 1 such type of Project projects with the client Timely payment before due date of expiry after Delay in payment achieving milestones Depending on project and site No conditions

Has not done a single Project with the Client

Lack of finance capacity Haven't been exposed to advance technologies

Lack of Financial capital Yes

Have the required Having the required resources but Does not have required occupied in other projects resources and has to hire resources and available Yes, have done more than 2 Yes, have done a project under No, didn't do a project under projects under same type of same type of contract same type of contract contract Does not require a JV/ Yes but we will be the Lead member Yes, we will form JV to do the required project Consortium Yes and have the Yes but does not know the bidding No, does not know the information about their strategy and the capacity of the Competitor bidder bidding strategy and the Competitor capacity of the Competitor Advancement in technology Resources stuck in an on-project

Not adopted any advance technology

Yes

No

Can't say

Points

Final Remarks Points

Fig 10

Sr. No. 1 2 3 4

Name of Component Construction work (Civil) Construction work (E&M) O & M (Civil) O & M (E&M) Grand Total

PROPOSED PRICE BID FORMAT Estimated Cost % Above below estimated (Rupees) cost 20,21,14,03,154 10,70,52,97,894 26,40,11,540 1,36,83,15,003 32,54,90,27,591

Percentage in figures

Total Cost (Rupees)

Fig 11

Fig 12 381 381

381

CT3009

MEPF: Services, Design and Coordination

Unit Assistant Mohit Natani Maulik Poriya

Faculty of Technology CT3009Monsoon 2021

4 th year Aatrey Patel Abhishek Chowatia Atharva Dave Neer Patel Nilay Bhuva Rudra Dhaduk Varun Doulatani

5 th year Aditya Doshi Ankur Ahir Khyati R Chandpa Mann Gandhi Vatsal Shingala

Shamik desai

Arpit Malviya

The course imparted knowledge of the services viz. Mechanical (HVAC), Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protection & Building Automation Services, that are essential and/or mandatory for effective performance of a building/facility. At the end of the course, while commencing conceptual planning (of a building/ facility) itself, the students had an overall vision of services to be incorporated and their implications in terms of form, function, aesthetics, and space. Students were familiarized with engineering terminologies, units/symbols/abbreviations, principles of design, standard engineering practices, sizes, conceptual layouts, space requirements, etc.

The learning process started with students’ past projects or a new facility as the case may be. Gradually, while learning each service, students upgraded their portfolio and observed/reported changes that are essential. Lastly, all the services were seen in a superimposed manner and conflicts, if any, were resolved. Building Information Modelling sessions took the learning to a different level. The learning process included lectures, PPT presentations (by industry experts/practicing consultants and faculty), site visits, quiz tests, group discussions/case studies, and tutorials.

382

382

382

Fig 1

Fig 21 383 383

383

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Neer Patel Exploded veiw of BIM model Fig2 Varun Doulatani Toilet plumbing drawing Fig 3 Varun Doulatani Toilet BIM model for plumbing Fig 4 Neer Patel Site services BIM model Fig 5 Rudra Dhaduk Exploded veiw of typical toilet BIM model Fig 6 Nilay Bhuva Top veiw of toilet 2d drawing

Fig 7 Ankur Ahir Fire protection layout of factory building Fig 8 Khyati Chandpa Fire sprinkler system BIM model Fig 9 Neer Patel Vertical services Stacking systems Fig 10 Aditya Doshi HVAC ducting and looping BIM model Fig 11 Abhishek Chowatia Vertical Stacking fire and HVAC system Fig 12 Atharva Dave Floor Plan with Hvac ducting and Fire spinkler system.

Faculty of Technology CT3009 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig Fig4 3 384

Fig 3

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7 385

Design UG Level-3

Fig 8 Faculty of Technology CT3009 Monsoon 2021

Fig 9

Fig 12 6 10

386

Fig 11

Fig 12 387 387

387

CT3010

Cantilevered Structures - Form, Material, Design And Construction Unit Assistant Khyati Andrapiya

Faculty of Technology CT3010Monsoon 2021

4 th year Aaradhya Parakh Aayush Palany Anushka Chaudhary Darshan Soni Das Debidatta Hitarth Khush Tiwari Mahir Patel

5 th year Dipen Prajapati Prakhar Yash Patel

Soham Shah

Nipul Patel

Cantilevers are a fascination for designers, whether architectural or structural. Ever since the invention of steel and concrete, engineers and architects have designed masterpieces with cantilevers. To achieve a proper balance between design and function, it is important that architects and structural engineers collaborate with each other. Cantilevers also work at the mass level where they symbolize an expression of freedom and boldness. Some of the most notable architects and engineers to use the cantilevers as an expression were Frank Lloyd Wright, Peter Rice, Norman Foster, Mahendra Raj, among many more Frank Lloyd Wright’s Falling Waters and Robie house changed the perception of housing and created a new style. The mushroom columns at the Johnson Wax museum are a testimony to the fact that Frank Lloyd Wright believed in expressing every material to its fullest.

The objective of the course was to inquire and explore the cantilevered structures by introducing, studying, examining and analyzing different materials and their respective properties. Through examples, study materials and exercises, students responded, engaged with and developed the understanding of the cantilever structural form as consisting of stability, serviceability and strength.

388

388

388

Fig 2

Fig 21 389 389

389

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Student Group Rendered Views of All the Projects developed in Studio Fig 2 Debidatta Das Tensile Roofing System over Steel Structure- The Delta Complex’

Faculty of Technology CT3010 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 5

Fig Fig6 3 390

Fig 3 Anushka Chaudhary Concrete Structure- Vue De La Rivière Fig 4 Aaradhya Parakh Steel StructureFerruccio l’artista Fig 5 Mahir Patel Timber StructureAreca Springs

Fig 3 391

Design UG Level-3

Faculty of Technology CT3010 Monsoon 2021

Fig64 Fig

392

Fig 5 393 393

393

CT3013

Engineering Urban Water Systems

Unit Assistant Abhinav Ahuja Jigar Patel

Faculty of Technology CT3013Monsoon 2021

4 th year Bhagvat Sardhara Chintesh Patel Jay Maniar Nikshat Gevariya

5 th year Bhaumik Upadhyay Harshit Vachhani Param Janani Rachita Awasthi Siddharth Parmar Taksh Shah Vishv Bhavsar

Tushar Bose

Janki Jethi

According to the United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund, more than half of the world’s population does not have access to safe drinking water and sanitation facilities. Recognizing the access to safe water and sanitation as a basic right, the United Nations introduced one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals to “Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.”

Junagarh is a small town in Gujarat with no different story. Half of the city households do not have access to piped water or sewerage connection from the municipal corporation. It also provides a unique challenge because of its topography.

In this studio, we take up this challenge to design the water supply and sewerage for the town. We will study the design principles of the different components of a system; learn to design these components and combine our understanding for an overall system design. For systematic learning two approaches for design will be followed- designing the system through basic excel sheets first and learning software for designing a more complicated system.

At the end of the studio, you will be able to estimate the demand, perform service delivery gap analysis and design the water supply, and sewerage network.

394

394

394

Case Study Junagarh with different Zones

Fig 2

Z - 11 Z - 12 Z-8

Z-9 Z-6

Z-5 Z-1

Z-2

Z - 14 Z - 15

Z-3

Z-4

Junagarh City Zoning Fig 1 395 395

395

Design UG Level-3

Fig 1 Bhagvat Sardhara Case Study Area for Studio Fig 2 Bhaumik Upadhyay Flow of Work and Contours of Zone - 4 Fig 3 Chintesh Patel Demand Allocation using Thiessen polygon Fig 4 Siddharth Parmar Population Projection Comparison using various methods Fig 5 Taksh Shah Designed Sewage Network in SewerGEMs Fig 6 Param Janani Junction Pressure Analysis & Tank Simulation in WaterGEMs

Fig 7 Vishv Bhavsar Pressure Distribution at Junctions (in m of H2O) Fig 8 Nikshat Gevariya Sewage Network Analysis in SewerGEMs Fig 9 Jay Maniar Topography/ Contour Analysis for Zone-6 Fig 10 Rachita Awasthi Water Network Cost Analysis with different Iterations Fig 11 Harshit Vachhani Sewerage Network Cost Analysis with different Iterations

Faculty of Technology CT3013 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 4 396

Fig 3

Fig 5

Fig 6 397

Design UG Level-3

Faculty of Technology CT3013 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 6 Fig 9

398

Fig 10

Fig 11 399 399

399

Tutor Profiles Aditi Anand Kumar is a practising architect collaborating in the fields of architecture and monumental steel sculptures, and has worked with Coconne (Belgium), Studio Decode (Bangalore), IWA (Colombo), and Balan Nambiar (Bangalore). She completed her undergraduate from BMSCE, Bangalore, and graduated from KU Leuven, Belgium, specialising in the designing of architecture within the urban context.

Ajay Patel is a graduate of the Faculty of Architecture, CEPT University. He has been a practicing architect since 1986. He has been visiting faculty in CEPT University in architecture, construction school, and in faculty of design. His area of interest is architectural photography, documentation, material studio, working drawings, precast housing and structural systems in architectural projects.

Akul Modi has received a master’s degree in Construction Management from Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia. He constantly compliments his Construction management course work with internships with well practicing construction firms, going above and beyond what was the mandatory curriculum. He has completed his Bachelor’s in Architecture from Institute of Environmental Design.

Anagha Joshi is an architect and urban designer. She is principal architect at LAB AU Studio.

She holds a master’s degree in Urban Design, SPA Delhi and has worked as coordinator of Documentation of Heritage Precincts, INTACH Vadodara. She is interested in contextual design, urban and heritage regeneration and construction through participatory planning and capacity building.

Anand Belhe is a winner of the award of achievement for outstanding scholastic success from NID which he received in 1987 for Designing the First Injection Moulded Plastic Chair in India and has worked with the world’s most renowned Designers. He holds many Indian and international patents in product Design and Process design. He is also the Dean of FD at CEPT and is directing FD in its new avatar.

Anand Panchal is a practicing professional with in-depth knowledge on areas of civil engineering.

An expert in building services, construction and structures, Anand has worked on the latest engineering and cost evaluation techniques for carrying out challenging projects from design to implementation. He has been teaching structural engineering at various universities in Ahmedabad since 2016.

Anand Vishwanath is an architect from New Delhi with interests in signage design & visual communication and graphics. Through his firm ‘Beyond Space’ he has worked for many projects pan-India including those for the Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Culture, NBCC Ltd., RITES Ltd., National Council for Science Museums, ASI, IHCNF-UNESCO etc. He is visiting faculty at CEPT and NID, Ahmedabad & NIFT. Ananya Parikh is an alumna of Faculty of Design; she graduated with an international master’s in Interior Architecture after completing a thesis titled ‘Thinking about Systems Thinking in Interior Architecture’. She has been working as a freelance designer since 2013. Currently she is working on her independent research project focusing on systems thinking for a holistic approach in design.

Anjanee Patel graduated with B.Tech. (Hons.) from CEPT University in 2016 and completed her M.Sc. in Environmental Engineering from University of Washington, USA in 2019. She has worked with First carbon solutions, California, as an air quality scientist and currently is working as an independent environmental consultant. Her research interest lies in the field of solid and construction waste management.

400

400

400

Anuj Anjaria earned his bachelor’s in Interior Design from CEPT. He runs his own firm named 7662 Design Workshop, which specializes in installations and sculptures involving kinetic movements.

He has been a visiting faculty at FD CEPT, teaching courses such as Furniture Design, Material Workshop, Construction and Technology. He is also a professional Hindustani classical musician and plays the Santoor.

Arijit Chatterjee is an Architect whose work focuses on Critical Infrastructure. He has worked in architecture, naval architecture and research. Projects include an office for the Commonwealth Tile Factory, Mangalore, India and a boatshed and refuge for the Villanueva boatbuilders, Chile.

Arijit is a visiting faculty at the Bengal Institute for Landscape, Architecture and Settlements, Dhaka.

Arpit Malaviya is a civil engineer with post-graduation in Advanced Construction Management from NICMAR, Indore. He has 4 years of experience in project planning, coordination with services consultants, procurement, construction management and statutory compliances.

Asha Sumra studied architecture at Cambridge University and in Valparaíso, where she specialized in Maritime and Nautical Design. Key projects include research into Indian Water Architecture, Industrial Architectural Heritage and the design of a Restorative Sea Farm for Chilean Patagonia. Asha was an INTACH UK Scholar (2017) and is an entering PhD Fellow at Aarhus School of Architecture, Denmark (2021).

Ayazkhan Pathan is an architect from Faculty of Architecture, CEPT University, Ahmedabad. After graduating in the year 2002, he has been actively involved in the fields of architectural practice, as well as academics. Since January, 2018 he has been teaching as Assistant Professor at CEPT University with interests in areas such as architectural detailing, tectonics, housing and urban design.

Bharat P has worked closely with Ar. Prashant Pradhan for the past 5 years, understanding all aspects of a design from the minute details to the large masterplan. A strong grasp of design development from a conceptual level to an execution level was evolved during this period, along with a sound approach to interior design under the guidance of an experienced architect.

Bhargav Tewar graduated with B.E. (Civil) from MSU, Baroda in 2006 and earned his post graduate degree in Geotechnical Engineering in 2009 from the same university. He has been associated with level 2 studios for the last 2 years; the studios are related to types of concrete. His major research areas are industrial waste utilization in building materials and ground improvement techniques.

Birva Joshi holds a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering. She has 15 years of work experience in the transportation engineering field dividing equally between engineering firms & academic institutes. Major areas of interest for her in teaching as well as in research are highway design & safety, public transportation, accessibility, traffic engineering, and different aspects of transportation engineering.

Catherine Desai has been associated with India since the 1990s. She is interested in the iterative relationship between strategic problem solving and subjective experience and between logical and surreal processes in design. She is an architect trained at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.

Chandresh Solanki is a Professor in the Civil Engineering Department (Geotechnical Engineering) SVNIT, Surat. He has 30 years of teaching experience in undergraduate and postgraduate programs. He has published 180 research papers, contributed to 9 books and received many best paper awards in conferences. He also has been involved in a number of Geotechnical Consultancy projects.

401 401

401

Chitra Vishwanath Graduated from CEPT in 1988. She established a freelance architectural practice in 1991; founded Biome Environmental Solutions in 2008; studied Civil Engineering at Auchi Polytechnic Nigeria 1977; attended a 1980 Workshop on Rainwater Harvesting at Gansu China; and a 2003 Workshop on Ecological Sanitation at Stockholm Environmental Institute Sweden; and a 2006 Workshop on Climate Change under Al Gore.

Deval Gandhi has been practicing interiors, architecture and urban design for 25 years in different countries such as US, NL, Switzerland (10 years), China and India. She graduated with her B.Arch. from CEPT and M.Arch., M.UD. from Berlage Institute, Rotterdam. She has been involved in many research and teaching projects in the Bern University and other institutes, and also coordinated an international masters.

Dexter Pereira is a graduate of APIED Vallabh Vidhyanagar, he is an architect & interior designer with over 30 years of experience in residential, commercial, retail and hospitality projects & 28 years of teaching experience with design institutes like NID, APIED, Anant National University & CEPT University. Besides design studios, he has taught subjects in technology, history, design at UG & PG level.

Dhaval Mistry has earned his bachelor’s degree in Architecture from CEPT University. He is interested in exploring the space making element in industrial facilities while maintaining the economic, social and environment sustainability of the overall projects.

Drishti Korat is an architect and an interior designer, enthusiastic about experimental designs.

Following her bachelor’s in architecture, she gained professional experience and pursued Master’s in Design (Computational design) at CEPT. She co-founded Studio Dvandva, a design practice that appropriates parametricism in the realm of interior-architecture. She conducts studios and workshops on computational methodologies, advanced modeling, and ObjectOriented Ontology.

Errol Reuebens Jr. is an architect, interior designer who founded ERA, a firm that benefits from collaborating with different disciplines. His other interests include history & theory, place and identity, sustainability, form, sustainability, adaptive reuse, etc. He is a graduate from the School of Architecture, CEPT, and has an M.Arch. from the University of Lincoln, UK. He has been teaching at CEPT for the last 3 years.

Gouthama DM is the Founder and Principal Architect at Mud Hands, Earth Architecture. He specializes in alternative design and construction, technological interventions in building systems. He has mentored many students through teaching, internships, and knowledge-sharing workshops across the country. He has conducted extensive research in the field of improvised and alternative building technology.

Hamid Raj is an alumnus of SID, CEPT, 1992 batch and has attended the co-op program in Architecture at Washington University in St. Louis (99-00). He has worked with Snehal Nagarsheth , OWH architects (St. Louis), Bijoy Jain & Associates (Alibaug-Mumbai) and Modfurn (Chennai).

Hamid has worked on architectural, interior design and furniture design projects. He has been teaching at CEPT since 2012.

Harshil Parekh is a socially engaged architect currently working with NGOs: VIKAS, Manav-sadhna and CanKids Kidscan. He has passion for working with underprivileged communities in urban/ rural areas. He has also worked with private firms and government organizations. His professional experience has been contributing to his teaching focused on co-production since 2019. He has a B.Arch. from CEPT University.

Hiten Chavda is an architect and sustainability professional who is passionate about creating passive design solutions for buildings & products that promote sustainable lifestyle. His areas of interest are biomimicry in design, phase-change materials in construction, flexible spaces, and innovations in housing & problem-based learning methods.

402

402

402

Imran Mansuri has over 14 years of multidisciplinary academic and professional work experience in India and the USA in fields of architecture, landscape architecture and historic preservation.

He has graduated from the Faculty of Architecture CEPT University and holds a Master’s degree in Landscape Architecture, with specialization in historic preservation from the University of New Mexico, USA. Jagrut Raval is an artist, designer and an educator with an interdisciplinary art practice that spans diverse mediums in various scales and is presented as installations, drawings, videos, photographic printing techniques and appropriation of mass-produced items and text. His interest lies in homogeneity of mediums and spatial relationships and his works are inquiries about time as experience.

Jahnavi Bhatt is a graduate from School of Architecture, CEPT University. She has been involved with Studio 305 since 2017. With 10+ years of professional experience, she has been working in and around Ahmedabad focusing on institutional and residential projects. She is interested in the fundamental and everyday aspects of architecture and the making of the built environment.

Janki Jethi has over 23 years of experience in the infrastructure sector; she is adept at not only technical issues but also excels in project management and business management. Currently, she is the Head of Water, Sewage and Solid Waste Management Engineering Division in GIFT City.

She is also associated with the Research & Development Work for ECO-WET Project awarded by IGSTC. Japan Shah is a structural designer from Ahmedabad with interests in designing high rise structures and industries. Through his firm ‘Japan Shah Consulting Engineers’ he has worked on many projects pan-India with clients like Godrej, Mahindra, Havmor etc. He is visiting faculty at CEPT, Indus and SAL, Ahmedabad. He has also guided some theses in structural design, in the Master of Technology program at CEPT. Jay Thakkar is an Associate Professor and Executive Director at the Design Innovation and Craft Resource Centre (DICRC) and Head of Exhibitions at CEPT University. He has worked on various design, craft & research projects in India, Europe and Australia. Notable books co-authored by him are Sahaj, Prathaa, Matra and Naqsh. He is a recipient of the Charles Wallace India Trust (CWIT) research fellowship.

Jayant Gunjaria a graduate of MSU, Baroda, is an architect and academician. He has worked and led design and technical teams at HCPDPM for over 5 decades. He has also been contributing to academia as a visiting professor and juror at various institutes. His eye for detail and meticulous crafting of building plans has helped shape the culture of design and exceptional drawings at HCPDPM. Jinal Shah has an international master’s in Interior Architecture with a specialization in Computational Design. She completed her undergraduate studies from KRVIA and postgraduate from CEPT University. Currently, she is a visiting faculty at CEPT University. Being a parametric enthusiast, she is exploring the potential of digital techniques and their integration within the realm of design.

Juzer Lanewala studied architecture at CEPT, and has been practicing for over a decade. Juzar has occasionally conducted experimental studios and theatre electives at CEPT and IPSA, Rajkot.

He has also been studying philosophy, history and literature. As an architect, he believes in experimentation and innovation, and design problems inspire him to seek appropriate solutions.

Katsushi Goto is a practicing architect/urbanist based in Mumbai and Tokyo; he is the director of design and research firm, Sqaureworks, Mumbai. He studied at Housing and Urbanism, AA London. His current research focuses on the domesticity associated with the materiality of the ideal-family home and the intersection of politics of public domain and interior urbanism. He is also a founding member of SqW:Lab.

403 403

403

Komal Parikh is a faculty at FT, CEPT University with more than 12 years of experience in s surveying and m apping. She has completed her graduation and post-graduation in Civil Engineering. She is an expert in 3-D mapping for building and infrastructure projects using advanced instrumentation techniques. Her research interests are exploring GIS in civil engineering applications.

Koral Adenwala is a visual designer, artist, design strategist and recently, an entrepreneur. She has designed games to research women’s reproductive health habits in Indian villages and interventions to increase financial inclusion in rural India. Her visual design work is informed by learnings and experience in spatial design, strategy, art, and dance.

Krishna Shah is an architect and academic with over 15 years of experience. She graduated from Center of Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT) University. She pursued her architectural practice at Ahmedabad and later at Vadodara, Gujarat. Here she served as a lecturer too at SEDA, Navrachana university, Vadodara till 2017. Currently she is practicing as an architect in Vadodara, Gujarat.

Kruti Shah is a graduate of the Academy of Architecture, Kruti pursued the Master of Architecture program at CEPT University, within the Architectural Design specialization. Currently, she is a Studio tutor at CEPT University. Along with teaching, she is the co-founder of Chaal.Chaal.Agency, a design-research collaborative that works on transformative infrastructure.

Mangesh Belsare holds an M. Arch. in sustainable architecture from CEPT University. He is a practicing architect and teaches as visiting faculty at CEPT University and other schools of architecture. He offers workshops and training programs related to structures, construction, climate, day lighting design, and designing with bamboo, at various schools of architecture across India.

Mansi Shah is an architect-urban-designer. She is currently based in Ahmedabad and teaches in Bachelor of Urban Design, as an Adjunct Professor in the Faculty of Planning at CEPT University.

With teaching, she works on her independent research projects on different subjects under ‘Ahmedabad Mapping Project’, ‘City Water Walks’, and ‘Productive urbanism’ (research and practice based on productive and edible cities). She has a keen interest in pedagogy and research and has carried out workshops to explore innovative ways to support her research and learning for students. She has also co-authored the book ‘Prathaa: Kath-khuni architecture of Himachal Pradesh’.

Mariana Paisana holds an undergraduate degree in Architecture from the University of Lisbon, and a Master in Urban Design from Harvard Graduate School of Design. Mariana worked in India, USA and Portugal focused on projects of urban rehabilitation and public space requalification.

In continuation with these topics, her master’s thesis looked at markets in public space and their temporal dimension.

Martin Anzellini is an Architect (M.Sc. Arch., Accademia di Architettura di Mendrisio), designer and has dealt with projects of different scales, locations and characteristics within the private and public sectors, as well as in the academy, in Colombia, India, United States and Switzerland.

Maulik Chauhan is an architect who graduated from CEPT University. He is also an alumnus of the Master of Art program from National university of Singapore with specialization in Urban design.

He has been teaching at CEPT University as a Visiting Faculty for two years and his interest lies in understanding the overlap between the fields of architecture and urban design.

Maulik Shah is Sr. Manager in Larsen and Toubro Construction limited and is working as an Overall Head of construction Methodology planning cell for for Gujarat and Rajasthan region and also is additionally taking care of tendering work for critical area of formwork and construction methods where major inputs are required for construction methodology and for overall schedule of the project before submission.

404

404

404

Meghal Arya, Phd is an Associate Professor at FA, CEPT and partner at Arya Architects; she teaches design and architectural history in UG / PG programs. Her doctoral research on architecture for water is underlined by a concern for water as a resource and for resilience of traditional systems. She has numerous publications to her credit. Her students have won national and international awards.

Mihir Bedekar has completed his graduation in Architecture from CEPT University, Gujarat. He is a practicing architect, with 8 years of professional experience in conservation, urban design, residential and commercial projects. He has worked on multiple projects in India, France and West Africa. He has been teaching design studios and courses across multiple institutions over the past 6 years.

Mitesh Panchal is a graduate of CEPT University, Ahmedabad and holds a master’s degree in Urban and Regional Planning from MSU Vadodara. He is a co-founder and partner at ANaHAT, a design studio based in Vadodara. He believes that each project is a unique opportunity with a different context and set of circumstances and therefore should have its own unique identity.

Muntaha Rushnaiwala holds a bachelor’s in Architecture from CEPT University. He spent six months under the guidance of Renzo Piano at RPBW, Italy. He worked as a Design Associate at the NID for 4 years majorly dealing with space planning, extensions, and renovations. Currently, he is a Visiting Faculty at NID and also parallelly runs a design practice named Rushnaiwala Architects.

Naandi Parikh has experience of working in retail store design for over 14 years. She has been heading the store design team for various brands overseas. She completed her bachelor’s degree in Interior Design from APIED, followed by a graduate diploma from University of Technology, Sydney and Master of Interior Design from the University of Hertfordshire UK. Neha Kothiwala is an interior designer with a work experience of 13 years in projects ranging from schools to office, healthcare, and residential interiors. She was part of the team for hospital & medical college at Baramati & King Faisal Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital at Riyadh. She has a keen interest in developing child centric spaces & introducing design to children at a young age.

She has taught at undergraduate level.

Nikunj Dave is a graduate from NC state University & accomplished founder of Aarya Precast India and Swaneer Innovations Pvt. Ltd. His research on Fiber reinforced concrete has led him to widen the scope of product development and deliver the same to the market. He is associated with CEPT University through summer schools and studios on precast concrete products; he also teaches at other institutions like Nirma University.

Nilang Pandya is a principal architect at Studio 305 based in Ahmedabad. He has worked with Kakani associates for 11 years on various institutional, healthcare, educational and residential projects. He is a graduate from APIED. His interest lies in understanding and exploring an architectural design focusing on space planning, materials, technology & construction details.

Nimit Killawala holds a bachelor’s degree in Architecture from KRVIA and an M.A. in Housing + Urbanism from Architecture Association, London. He has worked at HCP design, planning and project management, Ahmedabad. He currently serves as the Director at Group Seven Architects and Planners Pvt Ltd. He has also taught at KRVIA Mumbai.

Nipun Patel is a Structural Engineer and founding member of NIL Consulting Engineer since 2010. His professional work experience spans more than 15 years. NIL Consulting Engineer has completed more than 600 projects in Industrial, Commercial, Residential and Institutional sectors.

He holds master’s degree in Structural Engineering from Nirma Institute of Technology. He is also involved in teaching.

405 405

405

Nishi Shah is an architect & an urban designer. With a people centric approach & her interest in urban design, and heritage Precincts, she worked for the revitalization of Heritage Precincts project which included design of streets, public plazas & restoration of heritage assets. She believes urban design is a tool to improve public spaces as a way to enliven & enrich the experience of urban life.

Pankti Pandya is an architect and co-founder of Studio Inkling, a design and research initiative based in Ahmedabad. Ten years into the field of architecture she has varied experiences working with architectural firms on projects dealing with different scales and realms. Currently she is a visiting faculty at CEPT University and has also taught at Nirma University.

Pavni Pandya is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Technology. She holds a master’s degree in Civil Engineering from IIT Gandhinagar. Currently she is engaged with teaching a Geotechnical Engineering course and a studio related to it in an undergraduate program. She has taught Engineering Materials, Highway Engineering and Structural Failures, Repairs and Rehabilitation courses.

Percy Pithawala is an architect, academic and artist with over 25 years of experience. He graduated from M.S.U, Baroda and pursued master’s in Urban Design from Pratt Institute, New York. He has a keen interest in a rt and has held several exhibitions at galleries in India and abroad. He has founded The Red Studio at Baroda to further the discourse between Art, Architecture and Design.

Piyas Choudhuri is an Architect and Urban Designer based in Ahmedabad. He holds a B.Arch. from Jamia Millia Islamia University and an M.Arch. in Urban Design from CEPT University. He has been working as an Architect with Vastu Shilpa Consultants for a decade now. He is involved in some of the prestigious projects in the country like Nalanda University and Earthquake Memorial.

Prashant Pradhan is a graduate of CEPT University and pursued his post-graduation at the Berlage Institute, Netherlands. He has gained experience by working in offices in Amsterdam and New York and has also taught at the City Tech College in Brooklyn NYC. After returning to India, he established his office in Gangtok in 2007, and has been working in Sikkim, Darjeeling and Ahmedabad.

Prateek Banerjee holds a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture from KRVIA, Mumbai. He has worked with Ranjit Sinh and Associates, Mumbai and Raj Rewal & Associates, New Delhi. He is a partner at Architects’ Combine, Mumbai, and has been a visiting Faculty at Rachana Sansad as well as IES College of Architecture.

Priya Narayanan is a Faculty of Design alumna, running her interior design practice under the banner Tatva Design Studio where she handles projects of varying typologies. She is also a Partner at Soma Systems Furniture & UMU Fun Furniture. While she has been teaching at CEPT since 2016, actively contributing to developing the CFP pedagogy, she is also a published poet and children’s author.

Puneet Mehrotra studied at CEPT, and has been practicing since 2006. He is the founding partner of XPDS architects, with a focus on innovative designs rooted in the climate and context of a place. Along with practice, he also has more than 10 years of academic experience. He is deeply interested in the architectural and artistic traditions, and the cultural history of the Indian subcontinent.

Rachit Seth is an alumnus of Nirma University and BITS, Pilani with B.Tech. in Civil Engineering & ME in Structural Engineering respectively. He has professional experience of more than 8 years.

He has had exposure to designing of various types of structures such as bridges & flyovers, institutional & residential buildings, enabling & entry-exit structures for metro, VT & CCW pump houses, steel pipe rack and so on.

406

406

406

Rajiv Kadam is an associate professor at Faculty of Planning in CEPT. He completed his postgraduation in 1991 from FA, CEPT and has been engaged in teaching studios, the Humanizing Cities course, Urban Design Theory and guiding theses in Architecture and Urban Design. His major emphasis and interests are in the area of developing an in-depth understanding of nature, human aspects and urban ecology as the basis to design the built environment.

Ramesh Patel is an architect and urban planner who is keen to explore material and detailing. He has worked with Matharoo Associates for 5 years and has been running his own practice, RPA, since 2009. He has worked on various residential, institutional, industrial and interior projects and has 10 years of academic experience. He is a graduate of APIED and holds an M.Tech. in URP from the CEPT University.

Ramya Ramesh is an architect and urban designer passionate about collaborative design methods. Her interests lie in the domains of design research and community engagement.

She has professional experience in architectural design, urban research and curatorial projects.

Ramya has an M.Sc. in Building and Urban Design in Development from the Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College, London.

Ratna Shah is an architect, interior designer, urban designer and academician working in Ahmedabad. Her interests are combining and constructing for a nuanced spatial experience, thematically developing it using various collaborative mediums as well as giving attention to behaviour of the detail, themes & narratives, art & space. Ratna is a graduate from the School of Architecture, CEPT. Ravi Kashyap’s intuitive response towards climate and thermal efficiency in buildings has always been a primary concern, both, in practicing architecture and teaching. For over 28 years now, he has been closely working on sites with craftspeople, trying to integrate material, technology and skills to experiment and inculcate a scientific and rational understanding of construction details.

Rebecca Reubens trained as a furniture designer at NID Ahmedabad and completed her PhD at Delft University at the intersection of design, sustainability, and craft. Rebecca’s material of choice is bamboo, which she works with through her studio, Rhizome. She is a World Bamboo Ambassador for the World Bamboo Organization. She remains linked to academia through her teaching and writing.

Reshma Shah is Associate Professor and Head of UG Program, Faculty of Technology. She is also the Placement Coordinator. She has a Diploma in Building Construction, Diploma in Construction Technology (equivalent of B. Tech. Construction) and a PG Diploma in Construction & Project Management, all from the Faculty of Technology at CEPT University. She has more than 20 years of experience in teaching.

Rohit Raj Mehndiratta runs an art, architecture and research practice in New Delhi. He previously worked in New York and before that in Canada and in Germany for Frei Otto’s Institute of Lightweight Structures. He graduated from School of Architecture, CEPT and went on to pursue a postgraduate degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he received the Merit Recognition Awards in 2000–01 and 2001– 02.

Ruchi Mehta is a practicing interior designer with cumulative professional experience of 20+ years, both in India and USA. She has an undergraduate degree from CEPT University and master’s degree from University of Cincinnati, USA. She has a diverse design practice which includes brand research and strategy making, design and building of a variety of interior design projects and heritage conservation works.

Rudrapalsinh Solanki is a computational designer. He specializes in computational design, digital fabrication, and robotic fabrication. His area of interest is in research and development, on timber and metal structures fabricated using computational and digital tools. Part of his research is on the development of structural surfaces through computational design techniques.

407 407

407

Rupal Shah is consulting structural engineer and a computer software analyst, based in Ahmedabad. In a career of over 30 years, he has accrued vast experience in designing industrial, commercial, residential and institutional buildings. Apart from his independent practice and working as an associate with Tanik Consultants, he is a visiting faculty and external examiner at CEPT and Nirma University.

Sachin Soni is an associate professor at CEPT and has been teaching Architecture and Urban Design studios, History and Theory of Architecture and Visual studies. He is interested in architectural/design language and alternative paradigms for inclusive urban spaces. He is a graduate from Faculty of Architecture, CEPT and holds a master’s degree in City Design and Social Science, from LSE, United Kingdom.

Sadasivan Iyer specializes in mentoring design education with a focus on product design and related domains such as technical education, vocational training and management, and design education and management. He has over 40 years of Industrial experience in R&D, tool rooms, design and manufacturing of electronics products and packaging, and teaching experiences at NID, IGTR, NIFT and NTTF, while also managing and counselling the training of trainers in technical and vocational education.

Sagar Trivedi earned his B.Arch. from CEPT University in 2014. He has been working with Prof.

Neelkanth Chhaya since 2014. He has an individual architecture practice and has collabo Sahiba Gulati is an architect and academician. She has been teaching studios and courses at CEPT that address methods of participatory design and issues of gender in public space, which is also the focus of her research. Her most recent research project analyses women’s access to public transport systems. She is a Master of Architecture from CEPT University.

Sanal Thathapuzha is the Design Principal and founder partner at Sanal Aparna Associates.

He has been design consultant for heritage conservation and adaptive re use projects in the walled city of Ahmedabad. His practice also consists of design consultancy for projects involving sustainable building practices. He has also been involved in teaching at various Architecture and Design schools.

Sebastián Trujillo-Torres studied architecture at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and earned his M.Arch. from CEPT University by majoring in History, Theory, and Criticism. Aside from being a professor and invited lecturer in several universities, is the co-founder of Chaal.Chaal.

Agency: a design-research collaborative project working on experimental infrastructures between India and Colombia.

Shailesh Manke is an Interior Designer trained from CEPT University. He has his own design practice and has been working on various multidisciplinary projects from interior design to experiential design, exhibitions to space graphics. He was associated with NID, Ahmedabad as a faculty and coordinator: Furniture & Interior Design, for more than 7 years. He is also a visiting faculty at CEPT and NID. Shamik Desai has been an engineering & project management consultant for 42 years. He is CMD of Prishma Consultants. He holds a PG Diploma in Business Management from Xavier’s & bachelor’s in Engineering from LDCE. He is a Visiting Faculty at CEPT University and Adani Institute for Construction Management.

Shikha Parmar is an architect who graduated from CEPT. Her studio Achyutam’s designs encompass various architectural and interior projects. Being inclined towards research, she is co-authoring a travel book based on Uttarakhand and has been instrumental as an academician since 2014. She believes that the collaboration of poetic and pragmatic is essential to celebrate the process of designing healthy built environments.

408

408

408

Shivani Kapadia pursued Bachelor of Architecture from A.P.I.E.D., Vallabh Vidyanagar and Master of Architecture (Urban Design majors) from CEPT University. She has worked with the government as well as private architectural firms. Based in Vadodara for the past 2 years, she has her own practice with 2 partners and is also actively affiliated with Parul University.

Shoham Shah is the co-founder at Studio Arpana, dealing in architecture, interior design and product design. He is an alumnus of Taliesin, Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture, U.S.A. with an experience of over 10 years in practice and more than 50 completed projects. He has been teaching design studios, working drawings, tectonics, basic design and electives for over 3 years.

Shreya Gambhir is an architect and urban designer with a master’s Degree in Architecture from CEPT University. Her domain of study broadly lies in Urban Design, History and Theory. She is keenly interested in the socio- spatial theory of urbanism and its manifestation into designing human centric built environments. Besides teaching she is interested in architectural photography and documentation of cities.

Siddharth Srivastava is the Principal Architect and Co-Founder at Studio Inkling, a design and research initiative based in Ahmedabad. In the past ten years, he has accrued varied experiences working with architectural firms on projects dealing with different scales and realms. He has taught at various colleges of architecture in Ahmedabad and is currently an Adjunct Assistant Professor at CEPT University Sidhharth Singh is a graduate of School of Architecture, CEPT; he is a cultural practitioner & educator emphasizing low-tech hands-on multimedia engagements. Besides his nearly twodecade long industry experience across scales & disciplines of design, he has been involved in creative pedagogy since 2011, exploring the dependence of creativity on emotions and the need to be equipped with diverse mediums of exploration & expression.

Smit Vyas graduated from School of Architecture and set up STUDIO 4000 in Ahmedabad. In 2011, it won the 1st prize at the Spiretec International competition. Studio 4000 has been collaborating with the Kandla Port Trust to execute a range of buildings since 2015. The firm was awarded the 2018 Young Designer’s Prize in Architecture by the Indian Architect & Builder.

Subin Jameel is an architect and a graphic designer with interests in practice, digital pedagogies, speculative research, and theory. He worked as an Architect at Architecture Paradigm, Bangalore for 3 years and as an assistant teacher at SCI-Arc, Los Angeles. Degrees: B.Arch., RVSA, Bangalore; M.A., Architecture, Staedelschule, Germany; M.Sc., Design Theory and Pedagogy, SCI-Arc, Los Angeles.

Sujit Kothiwala is an architect from CEPT, Ahmedabad with a work experience of 18 years in university m aster plans, infrastructure, schools, healthcare, industrial buildings and residential projects. He has designed hospitals at Baramati and Riyadh and was a core group member of the Healthcare division at Stantec Consulting. He has taught for more than 8 years at both graduate and postgraduate levels.

Sukhmani Brar is the Co-founder & Principal Architect of Design Pendulum, a New Delhi based spatial design firm. She considers architecture as a frame of possibilities and not just a shell of certainty. Over a decade & half she has worked across the diverse scales of housing, architecture & interior design projects. She earned her B.Arch. at CEPT University in 2004.

Tulika Nabar Bhasin is an architect & urban designer. Through her work experience in Mumbai, she explored different scales of projects. She has worked closely on The Light Box project which sparked her interest in urban design. Being an avid traveler, she believes that the cities today are becoming more generic, and urban design is the tool to redefine a city’s character, and that place-making defines the way people react & function.

409 409

409

Tushar Bose pursued his master’s in environment planning at CEPT University after graduating in Environment Engineering from L.D. College of Engineering. He has worked on sectors of urban sanitation, environment impact assessment, capacity building of urban local bodies with national and international development agencies. His current research area is on assessing the impacts of Green Infrastructure.

Varun Yadav is a civil engineer practicing sustainability, not only in the building projects but also in life. He has been involved in the project development for over 12 years now, and his focus has been one co-friendly designs and sustainable buildings. He is also a green building consultant.

Vasav Bhatt is an architect with 20 years of work experience in architecture as well as interior design. He believes in perfection with timely delivery of work and has worked with architects A. D. Raje and B. V. Doshi. His interior projects include residences, offices, hospitals, radio stations and cricket stadiums. He has been teaching for 5 years at various architecture colleges.

Vinod Shah is an academician and a practicing structural designer. He is Founder and Principal Structural Designer at Vinod Shah Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd, firm engaged in design of structures. He has taught at CEPT University for almost 30 years. He is engaged in teaching structures to architects, engineers, and designers. He also heads the P.G. course in structural design.

Viral Bhavsar, is a graduate of MSU, Baroda; an architect, planner and academician who has been practicing and teaching for about 10 Years. He has worked and led design teams at MEGPL for 4 years. Currently he is a principal architect at Forme’45 design studio and a visiting faculty at IAPNU, Ahmedabad. His keen interests are the future of urban living, architectural history and design detailing.

Vishal Joshi is an architect & project manager with 19+ years of professional & academic experience pan India & GCC region. His expertise lies in design & master planning of large-scale projects. He brings in knowledge of extensive onsite experience gained during his association with multiple design practices in Bangalore & Pune. He is a graduate of APIED & holds a PGPIDM degree from NICMAR, Pune.

Vishwanath Kashikar is a tenured Associate Professor at the Faculty of Architecture, CEPT University. His main research interests are: the scope of architectural design in mass housing, and the role of pedagogical innovations in architectural education. The design studios conducted by him are situated in the intersection of these two interests.

Vrushti Mawani has a PhD in Planning from the University of British Columbia. Her work examines recursive relationships between infrastructure politics and governance and the spatialization of difference. She is interested in inquiring into and making visible everyday experiences of uneven access to resources. She has taught at undergraduate and postgraduate levels in India, Canada, and Australia Yatin Pandya is an architect, author and researcher who has been practicing and teaching for over 3 decades. A graduate of CEPT, he holds an M.Arch. from McGill University, Canada. He has been involved with city planning, urban design, mass housing, conservation projects and interior design.

His books Concepts of space, and Elements of space making have won prestigious awards.

410

410

410

411 411

411

Editorial Team Tridip Suhrud He is the Provost of CEPT University. He has been the Director of CEPT Archives for the past 2 years. Prior to this, he served as the Director of Sabarmati Ashram for 5 years. As an academic he has worked with DAIICT (Gandhinagar), NID, CSDS (New Delhi), and, St. Xavier’s College, Ahmedabad. He is a scholar of Life and Thought of Mahatma Gandhi and has published many books. He is a member of the Gandhi Heritage Sites Mission of the Government of India. He is also a member of the governing board of MICA since 2015. He holds a doctorate in political science along with master’s degrees in economics and political science.

Chirayu Bhatt He is the Deputy Provost–Academics, CEPT University. He has been leading the academic initiatives across all programs of the university and played a pivotal role in steering academic activities during the COVID-19. As an architect-urban planner, he has been working at the confluence of urban planning, urban design, public policy and more recently, education, for over 15 years. He holds a master’s in urban planning from Georgia Tech and a bachelor’s in architecture from CEPT.

Anjali Kadam Anjali Kadam is an architect and urban conservationist and Head, Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) at CEPT University. TLC was set up to inspire, support and strengthen new directions in pedagogy and learning at CEPT. Her work in historic cities, feeds into her research and academic experience of over 20 years. She holds bachelor’s in architecture from M.I.T.S Gwalior and master’s in architectural conservation from SPA, Delhi and is currently, pursuing her PhD in Architecture from CEPT University.

412

412

412

Copyrights Page © L2-L3 Studio Units Catalog – Monsoon 2021 Teaching and Learning Center, CEPT University Editors: Tridip Suhrud Chirayu Bhatt Anjali Kadam Copy Editor: Neha Krishnakumar Editorial Coordination & Layout: Bhuvaneshwari S. Devna Vyas Ishaq Faheem Heer Thakkar Cover Design by: Priyanka Awatramani Cover page Image credit: Sharanya Pisharody, UR3005 Published by: CEPT University Press Kasturbhai Lalbhai Campus University Road, Navrangpura Ahmedabad-380009 Gujarat India ISBN: 978-93-83184-48-4 Copyright © 2019 CEPT University Press Individual contributions are copyright of respective authors.

Images are copyright of respective creators, unless otherwise noted.

All rights reserved. This book or any part thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner, whatsoever without the prior written permission of the publisher.

413 413

413

TE ACH I N G AN D L E AR NI NG C E NT E R

414

414

414