L4 Studio Units Catalog - Monsoon 2021

Page 1

L 4

S T U D I O

UNITS CATALOG

MONSOON 2021


About TLC CEPT University set up Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) to support and strengthen new directions in pedagogy and learning. The role of TLC is to that of a facilitator and a collaborator. It supports the functioning of the ‘Course Approval Committee’ as its secretariat, and functions under the guidance of the Deputy Provost (Academics). TLC facilitates the following: a) Preparation for studio units and courses through structured workshops b) Innovation in teaching methods by partnering with faculty members c) Faculty development through online learning resources and peer learning For more information, please visit our website Teaching and Learning Center at https://cept.ac.in/tlc




L 4

S T U D I O

UNITS CATALOG MONSOON 2021 IV

IV

IV


V

V

V


Contents L4 STUDIO Introduction IX

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AD4004 Foundation Studio Sankalpa, Shilpa Mevada

13

AD4010 Vertical Living Jagrut Patel, Dhaval Gajjar

19

AD4012 Towards a Critical Project and a Project of Criticism. Situation: Capital Complex, Chandigarh Shubhra Raje, Kevin Mark Low HT4002 Foundation Studio: Histories of Space Gauri Bharat, Priyanka Kanhare

25 31

HT4005 Figuring Archives / Palimpsestic Architectural History of Lucknow 37 Sonal Mithal CR4002 Foundation Studio Mrudula Mane, Khushi Shah, Nigar Shaikh, Sabrina Khan

43

CR4001 Urban Regeneration Ashna Patel, Jayashree Bardhan

49

LA4003-A Foundation Studio: Decoding the Forest Divya Shah

55

LA4003-B Foundation Studio: Decoding the Forest Anjali Jain

61

LA4003-C Foundation Studio: Decoding the Forest Yati Sengupta

67

LA4009 Community Open Space Studio Nikhil Dhar, Rujuta Ranade

73

LA4010 Water Plus (Creating an Adaptive Urban Edge) Chandrani Chakrabarti, Priyal Shah

79

VI

VI

VI


FACULTY OF DESIGN BP4002 Simple Building Products Gaurang Shah, Amal Shah, Sagar Modh

87

BP4006 Building Product Design for Outdoor Spaces Sagar Modh, Vrushank Vyas

93

FD4003 Re-Design Process Samir Bhatt, Kaulav Bhagat

99

FD4011 Furniture For Outdoor Sandeep Mukherjee, Prachi Patel

105

FD4012 Outdoor Furniture Rajendra Mistry, aymin Panchasara

111

ID4008 Dropbox – within the Social Context Mili Parekh

117

ID4016 Computational Design - Biomimetics Arpi Maheshwari, Radhika Amin

123

ID4015-A The Big Rethink: Interior Materiality Kireet Patel, Aparajita Basu

129

ID4015-B The Big Rethink: Interior Materiality Kireet Patel, Rishav Jain

135

FACULTY OF PLANNING UP4002 Understanding the City Studio Anil Kumar Roy, Arjun Joshi, Narendra Mangwani, Nikta Bhakuni, Ravi Sannabhadti, Rujul Joshi, Rutul Joshi Rushil Pallavjhala, Tarun Patel, Umesh Shurpali, Vanishree Herlekar

143

UP4001-A Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio Jignesh Mehta, Hersh Vardhan Bhasin

157

UP4001-B Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio Utkarsh Patel, Amit Gotecha

163

UD4001-A Master Plan Studio Brijesh Bhatha, Purvi Bhatt

169

VII

VII

VII


UD4001-B Master Plan Studio Brijesh Bhatha, Vipuja Parmar

175

UD4001-C Master Plan Studio Brijesh Bhatha, Sophiya Islam

181

UH4001 Housing Project Studio Madhu Bharti, Rutool Sharma

187

UI4001 Infrastructure Project Studio Mona Iyer, Meera Mehta

193

UI4004 Infrastructure Project Studio (WASH) Mona Iyer, Meera Mehta, Siddh Doshi

199

UT4003 Transportation Detailed Feasibility Project Studio Shivanand Swamy, Khelan Modi, Nivesh Chaudhary

205

FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT UM4002-A Service Operations Management Studio Gayatri Doctor, Anoop Khajuria

213

UM4002-B Service Operations Management Studio Gayatri Doctor, Manish Vadanere

219

UM4004-A Urban Management Foundation Studio Nimitt Karia, Kruti Zaveri

225

UM4004-B Urban Management Foundation Studio Nimitt Karia, Avik Munshi

231

UM4004-C Urban Management Foundation Studio Nimitt Karia, Radhika Budhbhatti

237

Tutor Profiles

243

Editorial Team

251

VIII

VIII

VIII


Introduction We are happy to place before you, the 2021 edition of the Studio Units Catalog, for the Monsoon Semester. This is the sixth edition of L4 (Postgraduate) catalog series. The objective is to compile, showcase and share the range of studio units conducted in the postgraduate programs in Faculty of Architecture, Faculty of Design, Faculty of Planning, and Faculty of Management. It is a matter of some satisfaction for us that we are able to place this catalog before you in these very challenging COVID times. The University has been operational in the hybrid mode, which allowed students to access the campus on only three days every week. In spite of these constraints, tutors and students found innovative ways to make models and have produced interesting work. Postgraduate programs at CEPT are focused on helping students develop specialized skills and abilities. CEPT’s five-year undergraduate programs, comprising levels L1, L2 and L3, are focused on training apprentice ready professionals. L1 is a common foundation year aimed at building foundational abilities among students. L2, comprising years 2 and 3, are aimed at developing key design abilities like, visualizing and communicating, planning and organizing, constructing and specifying, and building arguments and rationales. In L3, 4th and 5th year students develop higher level abilities to exercise architectural / design judgment. The studio units have small groups of students led by one or two tutors, a greater curricular weightage in terms of credits and time, and a semester calendar which allows 4 weeks of uninterrupted studio work towards the end of the semester. The studios have a focussed approach with specific learning outcomes. The L4, or postgraduate studios are aimed at specific and specialized abilities like urban design, furniture design, architectural conservation, or ward management. These are specialized domains of study, usually taught by instructors with years of practice. The studio units presented in this catalog showcase the skills and abilities developed by the students under tutelage of able instructors and mentors. We have had to identify new ways of working and this semester along with the print version, we are sharing the online catalog. We are also putting up an online exhibition along with an abridged exhibition on-campus. The catalog enables us to present consolidated outputs of our continued efforts. We hope to share them with the larger community that includes people interested in the built environment, and education, prospective students, alumni and professionals from the habitat industry. This publication represents the work produced by around 640 of our students from 26 L4 studio units taught by 73 faculty members and supported by 46 teaching associates and teaching assistants. We will also be putting up an online website exhibition along with an abridged on-campus exhibition. We wish to express our profound thanks to all the unit tutors, teaching associates and assistants, students and staff involved in this effort. We also extend our sincere thanks to all our reviewers, jurors and guest speakers

IX

IX

IX


who have positively influenced the education of our young promising practitioners. We wish to express our profound thanks to all the unit tutors, teaching associates and assistants, students and staff involved in this effort. We also extend our sincere thanks to all our reviewers, jurors and guest speakers who have positively influenced the education of our young promising practitioners. Tridip Suhrud Chirayu Bhatt Anjali Kadam

X

X

X


11

Yash Rajput AD4010, Vertical Living Jagrut Patel, Dhaval Gajjar

11


FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE Postgraduate programs in: Architectural Design Architectural History and Theory Conservation and Regeneration Landscape Architecture

12

12


AD4004

Foundation Studio

Program Architectural Design Unit Assistants Kartik Nakkana Neel Jain Hemanshu Dodiya

Faculty of Architecture AD4004 Monsoon 2021

Students Aishwarya Kulkarni Akshara Krishnan Ameya Bidkar Ankit Matolia Arunima Suresh Harshit Laddha Healik Doshi Ishita Shah Jaikishore A Jayashri Murali Jinal Taunk Kalyan Vepuri Karan Yadav Khyati Dalal Kinjal Joshi Kosha Majithiya Meghana Padmanabhan Mili Prajapati Nagavarsha R Nikhil Patni Nikita Shintre Prajwal Deshpande Reebanta Paul Chowdhury Rishabh Jain Rucha Jaju Sai Hasita Krovvidi Sailee Repe Sakshi Mathur Sayantan Das Shivani Dhurkunde Shivani Mehta Shreya Pathak Tharuneswar J Vidula Mehendale Vivek Mavani

Sankalpa

Shilpa Mevada

Students were trained to detail out a building with focus on its tectonics, environmental factors and program. Students analyzed an urban situation as informers of siting a building and structuring a response to its surrounding. They learned to push forward innovative building solutions to engage with the pressing and speculative nature of time. Key considerations accounted for, while dealing with the studio were: 1. Emphasis on space as an outcome of affordance and synthesis of detail. 2. Expression of detail as a response to structural forces, material, climate and program. 3. Representation and communication of the expressive dimension of detail as a partner to space. Through this studio, students learned to: develop an experimental attitude while tackling design problems; e aware of and attempt design as a methodical search; develop abilities to adapt to design challenges within the constraints of use of basic to the latest available technology; develop ability to critically observe, analyze and elucidate an architectural form at various scales while recognizing its presence in a physical context.

13

13

13


Fig Fig 11 14

14


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Ishita, Vivek Road side view of the project Fig 2 MAAD ’21 Latches and Fenestration Models Fig 3 Healik, Jinal Spanning member assembly diagram Fig 4 Harshit, Jayashri Bay Assembly Model (Scale 1:10)

Fig 5 Khyati, Shivani Sectional Perspective Fig 6 Harshit, Jayashri Exploded diagram Fig 7 Kinjal, Sailee Model (Scale 1:50) Fig 8 Healik, Jinal Model (Scale 1:50)

Faculty of Architecture AD4004 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

15

15

15

15


Fig 3

Fig 4 16

16

16


Faculty of Architecture AD4004 Monsoon 2021

17

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 5

Fig 6

17

17


Fig 7

Fig 8 18

18

18


AD4010

Vertical Living

Program Architectural Design Unit Assistant Khoosh Prajapati

Faculty of Architecture AD4010 Monsoon 2021

Students Abhinaw Alok Anish Noone Arbina Mistry Arun Cherian Arvind Krishnan Gazal Nanwani Harshil Amin Yash Rajput

Jagrut Patel

Dhaval Gajjar

The studio explored the typology of high-rise buildings as a premise of mainstream housing development for the future. The design approach intervened to generate livability in vertical blocks. With growing development coupled with shortage of land, developer driven housing purely delivers isolated apartment towers having stacked floors in every part of the city, excessively consuming our urban experience and spaces. By analyzing the existing, students observed the manner in which conventional high-rise blocks have very little to do with different profiles of people living together, apart from their existence in their isolated apartments. The focus was to work towards design solutions that can be part of mainstream high-rise developments to create living spaces that boost physical and mental well-being, and allow integration without sacrificing privacy. It was also to address the need of a vertical community living environment that caters to changing social, economic, technological and environmental dynamics and shifts. Throughout the studio unit, the dimensions of professional practice were implied as methodology to conduct the individual work while applying the aspects of real world design practice in terms of decision making, collaboration, deliverable & communications.

19

19

19


Fig 1 20

20

20


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Multiple students collage of student’s intrpretation of the context Fig 2 Yash Rajput Redesigning Timmerhuis Fig 3 Arvind Krishnan Redesigning villas at Skycity, Ahmedabad Fig 4 Harshil Amin Redesigning social housing in Salburua Fig 5 Multiple Students Evaluation of housing Projects using multiple parameters Fig 6 Gazal Nanwani Evolution of the notion of ‘home’ Fig 7 Gazal Nanwani Site and user group analysis

Fig 8 Arvind Krishnan Massing and Layout iterations Fig 9 Arbina Mistry Evolution of final design. Fig 10 Gazal Nanwani Units and Cluster layouts Fig 10 Multiple Students Final drawings of the design projects

Faculty of Architecture AD4010 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 4

21

21

21


Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7 22

22

22


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Architecture AD4010 Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 10

23

23

23


Fig 11 24

24

24


AD4012

Towards a Critical Project and a Project of Criticism. Situation: Capital Complex, Chandigarh Program Architectural Design Unit Assistant Nikhil Makhijani

Faculty of Architecture AD4012 Monsoon 2021

Students Aastha Wadhwa Aayushi Tapiawala Abhay Sreekant Deepak Khandelwal Karishma Rathor Kurian Jacob Ojas Hiwrekar Ratik Verma Sasidhar Mahanti Shinthu Kave Shivani Sampat Shravya D G Siddhesh Satere Tushar Rajkumar Yashash Kanojia

Shubhra Raje

Kevin Mark Low

The prevalent discourse on architecture positions the architectural project as a singular act, made separate from the continuity and collective condition of the environment which we are (still) in obligation to share. The studio challenged this tendency to iconize the architectural project within our disciplinary discourse by a persistent curiosity to understand it as a part of the built environment, assessing its viability and limitations through a systematic inquiry into the conditions and consequences of its design. This semester, through the discovery of relevant questions, the studio investigated Capitol Complex, Chandigarh, a project familiar to us through its reputation and the established narratives of its successes. Students identified problems inherent in the existing design by way of vital relationships it failed to consider. Subtle, yet profound intervention/s that resolved the problems identified followed, shifting the emphasis from design solutions derived primarily from the expression of form to that of solving problems of relevance. Thus, the potential of the program was rekindled, as the meaning of use and continuity of the built environment was understood as that which constitutes critical architecture in service of responsibility over mere reputation.

25

25

25


6

5 6 2

1

6

3

4 1 Central Plaza 2 Assembly 3 Secretariate 4 High Court 5 Open Hand/ Agora 6 University

Fig 1 26

26

26


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Collective Work Transforming the Corbusian vision. Fig 2 Collective Work Constituted E-W Section thru the site establishing a common ground with contributions from Abhay (Fig-3) Secretariat/Karishma (Fig-4) Assembly/ Deepak-Siddhesh Central Plaza/OjasKurian-Shravya (Fig-5) Existing High Court accomodating the Faculty of Humanities, extended to the city through the Faculty of Humanities, flanked by the New High Court and Faculty of Law.

Faculty of Architecture AD4012 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 6 Collective work Section N-S thru the University Grand Court (a - Tushar), to the Agora with the transformed Open Hand (b - Deepak/Siddhesh). Detail of the Park Boulevard (c - Aastha/ Yashash) Fig 7 Collective Critique & Design Hypothesis Fig 8 Aayushi Student Dormitories linking linear city parks to the Capitol Complex Park

Fig 3

Existing

Existing

New

Proposed

West Section

East Section Existing Street Elevation

Proposed Street Elevation

Fig 2

27

27

27


Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 3 28

28

28


Faculty of Architecture AD4012 Monsoon 2021

29

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 6a

Fig 7

Fig 8

29

29


Fig 6b Fig 6c

30

30

30


HT4002

Foundation Studio: Histories of Space

Program Architectural History and Theory Unit Assistant Ashwini Deshpande

Faculty of Architecture HT4002 Monsoon 2021

Students Anjali Sreekumar Ankita Subudhi Ansha Kohli Bhakti Savsani Binita Bose Janhavi Kulkarni Kavya Mankad Nehal Hadia Roshini Pushparaj Samyuktha Krishnan Shivani M Sushmita V Pa

Gauri Bharat

Priyanka Kanhare

The foundation studio trained students in core skills of architectural historical and theoretical enquiry through the analysis of built environments and relevant archival material. Students learnt to observe and document a selected site, and analyse architectural cues to understand transformation. The pedagogy of the studio aimed to expand formalist histories, which typically dominate the students’ own consciousness of architectural history, and introduce them to larger questions of how the built environment is produced, used, remembered, represented, and transformed. The studio was organized in two modules, which covered historical documentation strategies and the process of constructing a timeline that chronicles architectural transformation. The modules were discrete and self-contained in terms of exercises, objectives and outcomes, but came together as a continuous process of inquiry through seminars and reflection sessions. By the end of the semester, students became aware of the analytical connections and conceptual overlaps inherent in built environment analysis, and were able to make appropriate connections across bodies of scholarship and their own modes of thinking, analysis, and writing.

31

31

31


32

32

32


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Group Work Architectural timeline depicting transformation in housing typologies (Late 19th c. - early 20th c) Fig 2 Shivani M Ornamentation of otla and its reflection on the life within Fig 3 Kavya Mankad Double Shuttered Door: Permutations in Pol Houses Fig 4 Janhavi Kulkarni Sanitation before the advent of underground drainage Fig 5 Janhavi Kulkarni System of Khalkuva as social infrastructure

Fig 6 Bhakti Savsani Change in configuration of kitchen Fig 7 Bhakti Savsani Storage space and its relation to kitchen Fig 8 Bhakti Savsani Dining room and its transformation Fig 9 Group Work Architectural timeline (1930-1950) Fig 10 Group Work Architectural timeline (1950-1980) Fig 11 Group WorkArchitectural timeline (1980- present)

Faculty of Architecture HT4002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

33

33

33


Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7 34

34

34


Faculty of Architecture HT4002 Monsoon 2021

35

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 8

35

35


Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11 36

36

36


HT4005

Figuring Archives / Palimpsestic Architectural History of Lucknow Program Architectural History and Theory Unit Assistant I. V. Sai Sasank

Faculty of Architecture HT4005 Monsoon 2021

Students Anisha Karambelkar Chinmay Gheware M Mallika Meena AL Pranjali Mathure Richa Bihari Sriparna Seal Tanvi Karia Yakin Kinger

Sonal Mithal The first module of the studio undertook an inquiry into and presentation of the palimpsestic nature of Lucknow’s architectural history in the form of palimpsestic historiographical maps. This privileged the archives, and later problematized the connoisseur-curatorial approach to selective archivability of events which biases the reading of a history. Further, the studio examined material evidence of an architectural form to locate it within the context of a political assertion and social hierarchy. UP State Archives, Amir-uddaula Library, and online resources are some of the archives that were accessed for this purpose. The second module used the potential of individuals to live, remember, and nurture their own memories in a fluid, erratic form so as to create a collective memory of a past event which is driven by state institutionalized modern history. This project-driven section of the studio helped students engage with the specifics of the problem and proactively take positions, in this case a politically charged position of remembering a traumatic event that has nationalist undertones. At the same time, spatializing the curated content aligns with the larger discipline of architecture, which makes a case for a transect between architecture and humanities.

37

37

37


Fig 1 38

38


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Mallika M, Chinmay Gheware, Pranjali Mathure Palimpsest Maps of Lucknow Fig 2 Anisha Karambelkar, Sriparna Seal, Tanvi Karia, Yakin Kinger Reconstruction of St. Mungo’s Church Fig 3 Chinma Gheware, Mallika M, Pranjali Mathure, Richa Bihari A Biography of Bibiapur Kothi Fig 4 Chinmay Gheware, Pranjali Mathure, Tanvi Karia War of Identities – A Board Game

Fig 5 Yakin Kinger Sikandar Bagh Fig 6 Anisha Karambelkar City in Time: Lucknow Chapter Fig 7 Meena Azhagappan Dilkusha Kothi - An application Fig 8 Richa Bihari HACKed: An application on European influenced architecture of Lucknow Fig 9 Sriparna Seal The Residency Siege: A Graphical Retelling

Faculty of Architecture HT4005 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

39

39

39

39


Fig 3 40

40

40


Faculty of Architecture HT4005 Monsoon 2021

41

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 4

Fig 6

Fig 5

41

41


Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

42

42

42


CR4002

Foundation Studio

Program Architectural Conservation and Regeneration Unit Assistant Deepti Varghese Faculty of Architecture CR4002 Monsoon 2021

Students Ann Shojan Apoorva G Chandni Thadani Dushyant Singh Gayathri S Kumar Jigar Rathod Mitali Parmar Mrunal Nidadavolu Parvati Poduval Revathi Anandan Shivani Singh Somya Khandelwal Swati Bhardwaj Vaibhavi Bhojkar Vidisha Purohit Vyoma Shukla

Mrudula Mane

Khushi Shah

Nigar Shaikh

Sabrina Khan

The Foundation Studio was focused on imparting and developing essential skills and understanding of conservation processes with an aim to build students’ capacity for engagement with complexities of built heritage conservation. The studio was divided into the following three interdependent modules: Documentation of Built Heritage; Understanding Traditional Building Materials; Analysis, Interpretation and Value Assessment. The first module commenced with an introduction to tools and methodologies for recording and methodical documentation of the historic structures as per the existing condition. The second module focused on understanding the properties of traditional building materials (lime, stone, timber, bricks, etc), their life cycles and the processes of their deterioration through site observations, hands-on exploration and laboratory analysis. The module also explored conservation approaches with a focus on the compatibility of restoration materials. The third module aimed to develop the capacity for critical analysis of historic structures and their context leading to identification, interpretation and assessment of values embedded, respectively, in their various aspects.

43

43

43


Fig 1 44

44

44


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Revathi, Vaibhavi, Shivani, Dushyant, Gayathri, Mrunal Section of Aurobindo Bhavan; photogrammetric exploration. Fig 2 Apoorva G Vachli Khadki Ground Floor Plan with floor images Fig 3 Apoorva G Vachli Khadki Ground floor RCP with ceiling images Fig 4 Jigar Rathod Material mapping of Dharmaj Library Building Fig 5 Dushyant Singh Analyzing the building for its different attributes

Fig 6 Mitali Parmar Role of wooden architecture in assessing value of khadki Fig 7 Jigar Rathod Sound Mapping in and around Dharmaj Library Fig 8 Jigar Rathod User-Activity analysis and associations at Dharmaj Library Fig 9 Ann Shojan Context Plan of Dharmaj Library Fig 10 Vidisha Purohit User-Activity Analysis at Vachli Khadki Fig 11 Ann Shojan Mind-map of value assessment of Dharmaj Library

Faculty of Architecture CR4002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

45

45

45


Fig 5 46

46

46


Faculty of Architecture CR4002 Monsoon 2021

47

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

47

47


Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11 48

48

48


CR4001

Urban Regeneration

Program Architectural Conservation and Regeneration Unit Assistant Zeus Pithawalla Faculty of Architecture CR4001 Monsoon 2021

Students Aastha Desai Amriteshwari Arun Anagha L Bhanumathi VV Jahanvi Sinha Parul Parganiha Pragya Nagar Priyanka Baghel Rohan Madan Sacheen Pai Raikar Sneha Anand Sneha Gireesh Tejaswini Mirajkar Vishvesh Pathak

Ashna Patel

Jayashree Bardhan

Cities are complex systems that are persistently subjected to processes of physical, environmental, social, economic, and cultural change. Historic urban areas form integral parts of these systems by being representative of the traditional built fabric, spatial morphology, local identity, culture, and the collective heritage of a place. At a global level, these areas often become symbols of cultural tourism. The need to safeguard their authenticity of tangible and intangible aspects amidst the challenge of urban growth and the shifting lifestyle and space usage patterns of its users is therefore crucial. Urban regeneration is an all-inclusive action-based process that aims at bringing long-term solutions to urban problems in order to make significant improvement in the overall condition of a place. This studio, with the aim of addressing the complex narratives of historic urban sites through the lens of conservation, introduced its participants to tools and methods of documenting, mapping, and assessing cultural assets of a historic city. The participants engaged with the site, its inhabitants, and the stakeholders responsible for transformation, to arrive at a strategy of conservation led urban regeneration. The studio also included input sessions, expert lectures and workshops.

49

49

49


Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 5

50

50

Fig 6

50

50


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Vishvesh Pathak Street Elevation of Mohan Chowk, Dharmaj Fig 2 Dharmaj Group Establishing the sense of place at Dharmaj Fig 3 Ahmedabad Group Historical Timeline and Succession Maps of Amd Fig 4 Priyanka Baghel Street Elevation of ST Bus Stand Main Road, Dharmaj

Fig 5 Ahmedabad Group Understanding the structure of Tankshal ni Pol, Ahmedabad Fig 6 Anagha L Reasons behind changes in the built fabric (resident interviews) Fig 7 Ahmedabad Group Pictures from Stakeholder Discussions at Tankshal ni Pol Fig 8 Sacheen Pai Raiker An inventory of heritage assets in Tankshal ni Pol

Faculty of Architecture CR4001 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8 Fig 9

51

51

51


Fig 10

Fig 11 52

52

52


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 9 Pragya Nagar Street Elevation of Tankshal Road, Ahmedabad Fig 10 Dharmaj Group Pictures from Stakeholder Discussions at Dharmaj Fig 11 Dharmaj Group and Amriteshwari Arun Mapping cultural assets and other layers of Dharmaj’s built fabric Fig 12 Sneha Anand Mapping Vacant/Abandoned Structures in Dharmaj

Fig 13 Sneha Gireesh Identifying potential sites for design interventions, Dharmaj Fig 14 Priyanka Baghel Elevation, Dharmaj Fig 15 Bhanumathi VV Understanding Tobacco Processing in Dharmaj Fig 16 Rohan Madan Interpretation of the history of migration through a site game Fig 17 Amriteshwari Arun Toolkit for assessing the conservation process

Faculty of Architecture CR4001 Monsoon 2021

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14

53

53

53


Fig 15

Fig 16

Fig 17 Fig 14

54

54

54


LA4003-A

Foundation Studio: Decoding the Forest

Program Landscape Architecture Unit Assistant Sankalpa Patel Faculty of Architecture LA4003-A Monsoon 2021

Divya Shah Students Aditi Patalia Afrah Jahan Ankita Jayaram Arshav Parikh Dhwani Shah Kruti Desai Prakriti S Priyanka Kumbhar Ritika Jaggi Suman Harapanahalli Susanna Korah Sutanaya Chakraborty

The studio begins with a fundamental premise of landscape architecture: reading & representing a landscape and responding to it articulately. In the first part ‘Reading & Representing’, the studio looked at ways of seeing, recording, and decoding a place through drawings. It proceeded to make a set of constructs that measure and explore the landscape in an interpretative manner. In the second part ‘Imagining & Constructing’, the students derived a larger idea related to the landscape they investigated. Based on their vision, narrative and representation of the landscape studied, they attempted to imagine a response to the site. The studio brief is as follows: One Forest The forest/ the jungle/ the woods: A place that we sense as archaic, primeval; a space that is deep & dense. Forests are complex, layered and varied in terms of ecology, chronology & the human narratives that describe them. While they can be understood as rational relationships of geography, soil, climate, and vegetation they are also more than the sum of these parts and have their place deep in the human imagination. We investigated a forest and attempted to look at it from a multi-dimensional perspective to develop many ways of understanding this complex unit and then imagined a response to its many natures that allows a meaningful engagement with it.

55

55

55


Fig11 Fig 56

56

56


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Aditi Patalia Forest sketches Southern tropical dry deciduous forest and Northern tropical thron forest, Saurashtra peninsula, (Barda Forest) Fig 2 Arshav parikh Forest section-Moist and dry deciduous forest Foothills of shivaliks, Outer Himalayas, (Jim corbett park) Fig 3 Kruti Desai Forest section-Southern moist and dry deciduous forest, foothills of Satpura range, Northern western Ghats, (Purna wildlife Sanctuary) Fig 4 Sutanya Chakraborty Forest section Tropical moist deciduous and tidal swamp forest, (Baratang islands, Andaman islands)

Fig 5 Afrah Jahan Point of pause -Myristica swamps of Wet Evergreen Fig 6 Priyanka Khumbhar Investigation systems,Seasonal chnages along stream beds of Montane broad leaved semi evergreen and moist deciduous forest (Bhimashankar wildlife sanctuary) Fig 7 Kruti Desai Tracing the Unseen water of Southern moist and dry deciduous forest, (Purna wildlife Sanctuary) Fig 8 Ritika Jaggi Edge Condition of Sourthern Tropical Dry Deciduous forest(Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve)

Faculty of Architecture LA4003-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

57

57

57


Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig43 Fig 58

58

58


Faculty of Architecture LA4003-A Monsoon 2021

59

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 5

Fig 6

59

59


Fig 7

Fig 8

60

60

60


LA4003-B

Foundation Studio: Decoding the Forest

Program Landscape Architecture Unit Assistant Meen Vishal Purohit Faculty of Architecture LA4003-B Monsoon 2021

Anjali Jain Students Trupti Thandaveswaran Gayatri Sonje Shiladitya Paul Meghna Kanungo Sraman Ghosh Janhavi Joshi Loknath Mandal Devika Shibu Radhika Agarwal Shruthi Mohan Vatsla Bhatia

The studio begins with a fundamental premise of landscape architecture: reading & representing a landscape and responding to it articulately. In the first part ‘Reading & Representing’, the studio looked at ways of seeing, recording, and decoding a place through drawings. It proceeded to make a set of constructs that measure and explore the landscape in an interpretative manner. In the second part ‘Imagining & Constructing’, the students derived a larger idea related to the landscape they investigated. Based on their vision, narrative and representation of the landscape studied, they attempted to imagine a response to the site. The studio brief is as follows: One Forest The forest/ the jungle/ the woods: A place that we sense as archaic, primeval; a space that is deep & dense. Forests are complex, layered and varied in terms of ecology, chronology & the human narratives that describe them. While they can be understood as rational relationships of geography, soil, climate, and vegetation they are also more than the sum of these parts and have their place deep in the human imagination. We investigated a forest and attempted to look at it from a multi-dimensional perspective to develop many ways of understanding this complex unit and then imagined a response to its many natures that allows a meaningful engagement with it.

61

61

61


Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

62

62


Architecture PG Level-4 Faculty of Architecture LA4003-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Vatsla Bhatia Recording Landscape (Moist and dry deciduous forest, Jim Corbett National Park) Fig 2 Meghna Kanungo Recording Landscape (Southern tropical dry deciduous forest, Pavagarh hill forest reserve) Fig 3 Trupti Thandaveswaran Recording Landscape (Moist deciduous forest and tidal swamp forest, Baratang island) Fig 4 Trupti Thandaveswaran Section (Moist deciduous forest and tidal swamp forest, Baratang island) Fig 5 Sraman Ghosh Section ( Tropical semi-evergreen and grassland forest, Kaziranga national park) Fig 6 Loknath Mandal Section (Tidal Forest, Sundarbans) Fig 7. Meghna Kanungo Section (Southern tropical dry deciduous forest, Pavagarh hill forest reserve)

Fig 8 Vatsla Bhatia The forest transitions, Mixed Sal - Riverine - Plantations. Fig 9 Shruthi Mohan Tracing the riparian edge along the river, across the bamboo clumps and with grasslands Fig 10 Devika Shibu Fresh water system in the swamp Fig 11 Trupti Thandaveswaran Forest typology (Tropical moist deciduous forestTropical semi evergreen forest-Karstic tropical evergreen forest) Fig 12 Radhika Agarwal Seasonal changes in the system of grasslands and wetlands Fig 13 Loknath Mandal Mudflats and back-swamps under low saline condition Fig 14 Gayatri Sonje Section through various landforms (Movement of water from plateau edge into valleys which is responsible for formation of various micro habitats)

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

63

63

63


Fig 8

Fig 9 64

64

64


Fig 11 Faculty of Architecture LA4003-B Monsoon 2021

65

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 10

Fig 12

Fig 13

65

65


Fig 14 Fig 5 66

66

66


LA4003-C

Foundation Studio: Decoding the Forest

Program Landscape Architecture Unit Assistant Dikshaa Gurnani Faculty of Architecture LA4003-C Monsoon 2021

Yati Sengupta Students Aarohan Dutta Lakshmi S Nitya Varshney Parvathy Murukesan Prerana Chopade Rajput Deepti Risav Gupta Sayanth Sujan Shah Reeyaa Tankhiwale Janhavi Vedika Chapadgaonkar

The studio begins with a fundamental premise of landscape architecture: reading & representing a landscape and responding to it articulately. In the first part ‘Reading & Representing’, the studio looked at ways of seeing, recording, and decoding a place through drawings. It proceeded to make a set of constructs that measure and explore the landscape in an interpretative manner. In the second part ‘Imagining & Constructing’, the students derived a larger idea related to the landscape they investigated. Based on their vision, narrative and representation of the landscape studied, they attempted to imagine a response to the site. The studio brief is as follows: One Forest The forest/ the jungle/ the woods: A place that we sense as archaic, primeval; a space that is deep & dense. Forests are complex, layered and varied in terms of ecology, chronology & the human narratives that describe them. While they can be understood as rational relationships of geography, soil, climate, and vegetation they are also more than the sum of these parts and have their place deep in the human imagination. We investigated a forest and attempted to look at it from a multi-dimensional perspective to develop many ways of understanding this complex unit and then imagined a response to its many natures that allows a meaningful engagement with it.

67

67

67


Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

68

68


Architecture PG Level-4 Faculty of Architecture LA4003-C Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Nitya Varshney Recording Landscape (Moist and dry deciduous forest, Jim Corbett National Park) Fig 2 Reeyaa Shah Recording Landscape (Montane subtropical Pine forest, Bir forest) Fig 3 Aarohan Dutta Recording Landscape (Semi-arid and dry deciduous forest, Sanjay van) Fig 4 Aarohan Dutta Section (Semi-arid and dry deciduous forest, Sanjay van) Fig 5. Risav Gupta Section (Montane temperate forest, Jalori Protected forest) Fig 6 Vedika Chapadgaonkar Transition from riparian to teak mixed bamboo forest Fig 7 Rajput Deepti Section (Southern moist deciduous forest, Vansda National Park)

Fig 8 Parvathy Murukesan Vayals modified by invasion of bambusa arundinacae Fig 9 Sayanth Sujan Point of pause Fig 10 Lakshmi S Section showing vegetation and stream in tropical evergreen forest under normal conditions Fig 11 Prerana Chopade Vegetation of rock surfaces Fig 12 Lakshmi Point of pause- The captivating rainforest Fig 13 Risav Gupta Threshold of alpine herbaceous vegetation and pure stands of kharsu oak. Fig 14 Janhavi Tankhiwale Section through lake and grassland

Fig 4

Fig 5

69

69

69


Fig 6

Fig 7 70

70

70


Fig 9 Faculty of Architecture LA4003-C Monsoon 2021

71

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 8

Fig 10

Fig 11

71

71


Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14 72

72

72


LA4009

Community Open Space Studio

Program Landscape Architecture Unit Assistant Tvara Sharma

Faculty of Architecture LA4009 Monsoon 2021

Students Avneet Kaur Drishti Ghosh Hardikkumar Agawala Lavanya K Mabel Annie Biju Pranathi G Raveesh M Rose Mary Sebastian Rucha Ketkale Sneha John Tanuj Gupta

Nikhil Dhar

Rujuta Ranade

The studio engaged with public open spaces of varying sizes and characters, to achieve an understanding of their evolution and present functioning. The intangible attributes of a space were also studied, including its connections to the art and traditions of the place, and the cultural meanings that it holds for its varied set of users. After completing this studio unit, the students had studied a public open space in detail through different lenses including geography, society, art, culture and heritage, ecology and micro climate. The spaces were also looked at in connection with the temporarily and seasonality of their uses. This study and the need to develop multiple methods of engaging with public space, called for creative thinking to find ways to strengthen community engagement in planning and design, over varying economic and social strata, genders and ages. Students were asked to write concisely and clearly about the topics covered in the Studio, including the design process and the final design. The studio exposed students to theories and writings related to landscape architecture and open space, such as theories of landscape Perception and Place, Critical regionalism, Ecological determinism and Landscape Urbanism.

73

73

73


Fig 1 74

74

74


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Hardikkumar Agawala Storyboard Fig 2 Sneha John Section through detail plan Fig 3 Raveesh M Site section Fig 4 Avneet Waraich Section through waterbody during monsoon season Fig 5 Tanuj Gupta Vision montage Fig 6 Gumudala Pranathi Stakeholder Analysis

Fig 7 Rucha Ketkale Design Proposal View Fig 8 Drishti Ghosh Detail Plan Fig 9 Mabel Biju Stakeholders montage Fig 10 Lavanya K Site Sections Fig 11 Rose Sebastia Grid Plantation View

FacultyofArchitectureCommunityOpenSpaceStudioMonsoon2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

75

75

75


Fig 5

Fig 6 76

76

76


FacultyofArchitectureCommunityOpenSpaceStudioMonsoon2021

77

Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 7

Fig 8

77

77


Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 8

Fig11 9 Fig 78

78

78


LA4010

Water Plus (Creating an Adaptive Urban Edge) Program Landscape Architecture Unit Assistants Shreshtha Waghray Faculty of Architecture LA4010 Monsoon 2021

Students Anmol Tewari Anuja Patil Chanakya Rajani Janhavi Modh Jegan M Khushboo Prashant Madhoolika P Rukeia Bora Sakshi Rashinkar Sanika Kalantre Selvee Pandoriya Zenia Vandrewala

Chandrani Chakrabarti

Priyal Shah

Constant dependence on the ground water, coupled with diminishing recharge due to growing previous surfaces around the water bodies, makes the cities more vulnerable to climate changes. Urban rivers go through the vicious cycle of negligence and degradation, and slowly become an eyesore. There has never been a more urgent need to restore these damaged river ecosystems than now. The studio Water Plus advocated design proposals along a growing urban water edge to create ecological designs to nurture social interactions. The studio invited students to conceive and generate innovative public landscapes that re imagine an urban water edge from the lens of ecology. If social spaces and ecology can go hand in hand, we can create great civic spaces for the next century. With the imminent environmental crisis, people have started to believe in the value of a balanced environment. What is good for other organisms is also good for people. In fact, people need to be made aware of the value of natural systems so that they can be the active stewards of the environment. To create such a transformational environment, landscape architects must prove the value of their solutions as performance landscapes that can be tested across time and adverse scenarios.

79

79

79


M L A J

B

H

L

I K

L I I

K

B

I Legend: A. Productive landscape educational center B. Temple C. Wild orchard and Cow shed D. Green house information center H. Educational trail F. Community kitchen G Market H. Transportation unit I. Vegetable cultivation J. Floral cultivation K. Orchards L. Cucurbite cultivation M. Bio swale 0

50

J G

H

B

F C

D

E

B A

F

Fig 1

100 m

Cynodon dactylon

Chrysopogon zizanioides

Caesalpinia pulcherrima

Cordia sebestena

Peltophorum pterocarpum

Azadirachta indica

Capparis decidua

Cymbopogon citratus

M1 V

L2 Ficus religiosa

M1 N

Manihot esculenta

Legend L Cucurbite information center L1 Cucurbite trail L2 Cucurbite cultivation L3 Cultivation experiential trail M Bio swale M1 Bio swale trail N Seasonal river bed trail O Wetland pause point

L2

L3

Butea monosperma

L1 Bauhinia purpurea

H

Calliandra emarginata

Cassia fistula

Cassia javanica

salvadora oleoides

L

Fig 2 March Plot 1 Cucumber and onion

Plot 4 Sunflower and cucumber

June Plot 1 Fallow land

Plot 4 Fallow land

December Plot 1 Bush beans and lentils

Plot 4 Bush beans and lentils

Fig Fig31 80

80

80


Architecture PG Level-4

Fig 1 Khushboo P Productive landscapes to relink socio-cultural connections Fig 2 Khushboo P Strategies and translation Fig 3 Khushboo P Companion planting calendar for selected plot Fig 4 Janhavi M Reviving riparian edge avifauna habitats

Fig 5 Jegan M River bed as public realm Fig 6 Rukeia B Programming the forest Fig 7 Jegan Imagining urbanized edges Fig 8 Sanika K Indicator species to revive riparian edges Fig 9 Janhavi M Visualizing avifaunal activities across seasons

1

3 4

2

Faculty of Architecture LA4010 Monsoon 2021

6

5

7 9

1 8 10

12 16 14

11

13 1. Access from village 2. Walkway on village edge 3. Viewing deck 4. Platform and space for awareness drives 5. Nature interpretation Centre 6. Space for festive gathering 7. Open amphitheater 8. Space for educative programs 9. Coconut plantation 10. Community garden 11. Peace garden 12. Green ways for tree walk 13. Cycle ways 14. Elevated trails 15. Bird watching deck 16. Water trail 0

Fig 4

25

50m

D

B

F

E

Fig 5

81

81

81


AC

C

ES

S

IB

IL

I

T

EL W EVA AL T KW ED AY S

Y

TR

AI

TO UR IST S

LS

PL

AT F

OR

MS

PAV IL IO

NS

RS EE NT LU VO

W

NG KI AL CK A

TR

MO

UN

DS

STUDENT S

L AC

UNA

S

PO N D

S

ING ULPT D SC LAN

R VE -O LK S WA I D G E BR

LA KE S

STAIR CASE

TS IDEN RES

ST EP S/ RAMPS

STEP P S TO IN G NES SHE

AR

IN

G

PL

S ST TI AR

NC

DL

IG

LTE

OD

RS

S

INS TA L LA TIO NS

RE

FE

TP

BUILTS ENVIRO NMEN T

SEATING

HT

IN

G

AC AR DS

O

B

M A NA GE RS

S

S

AR

CT

UL

JE

OC

NG DI IN Y F GE WA G N A SI

B IN

Fig 6 Section CC’

Part plan at C

Part plan at E

Section EE’

C

E

E’

C’

Part plan at D

D

Section DD’

D’

Part plan at F

F

Section FF’

F’

Fig 7 82

82

82


Architecture PG Level-4

Deciduous trees (Host plants) Bombax ceiba Cassia fistula

Shrub cluster (Host plant) Barleria cristata Argemone mexicana Echinops echinatus

Dense canopy tree (Host plant) Mimusops elengi

Shrub cluster (Nectar plant) Stachytarpheta indica Gomphrena globosa Hedychium coronarium Zinnia peruviana

Sparse canopy trees (Host plant) Azadirachta indica

Shrub cluster (Host plant) Senna occidentalis Mimosa pudica

Sparse canopy trees (Host plant) Acacia nilotica

Ground cover cluster (Host plant) Andrographis serpyllifolia Barleria buxifolia Wedelia trilobata

Sparse canopy shrub (Host plant) Dichrostachys cinerea

Faculty of Architecture LA4010 Monsoon 2021

Plan (Grid size 5m X 5m)

0

5

10m

Dense canopy trees (Host plant) Pongamia pinnata Saraca asoca

Bicycle track Asphalt concrete

Sparse canopy shrub (Host plant) Capparis decidua

Primary trail Brick pattern

Shrub (Host plant) Hygrophila auriculata

Metamorphose trail Brick pattern

Climbers(Host plant) Passiflora incarnata (Red and purple)

Emergent trail Compacted soil

Grasses cluster Chrysopogon zizanioides Cynodon dactylon

Stepping stone

74 M 73 M 72 M

Metamorphose Zone Primary trail

Thick dense Seasonal understorey grasses buffer

Water retention pond

Seasonal grasses

Emergent Zone Metamorphose trail

Thick dense Emergent understorey trail

Metamorphose Zone Thick dense understorey

Metamorphose trail

Thick dense understorey

Section at AA

74 M 73 M 72 M 71 M

Metamorphose Zone Primary trail

Thick Water retention Metamorphose Water retention understorey pond trail pond Seasonal Seasonal Seasonal buffer Seasonal grasses and thin grasses and thin grasses and thin grasses understorey understorey understorey

Emergent Zone Nectar species

Emergent trail

Nectar species

Section at BB

Fig 8

83

83

83


Monsoon

Difficult to spot Moderately seen Frequently seen

Winter

Difficult to spot Moderately seen Frequently seen

Summer

Difficult to spot Moderately seen Frequently seen

Fig 9 84

84

84


85

Prachi Sampat FD4012 Outdoor Furniture Rajendra Mistry, Jaymin Panchasara

85


FACULTY OF DESIGN Postgraduate programs in: Building Products and System Furniture Design Interior Design

86

86


BP4002

Simple Building Products

Program Building Products and Systems Unit Assistants Manali Patel Prachi Nagar Faculty of Design BP4002 Monsoon 2021

Students Adarsh Roodkee Maulik Soni Nayonika Goud Nihar Ghodke Shilpa Mallya Tina Gupta Vanshika Issrani

Gaurang Shah

Amal Shah

Sagar Modh

The studio aimed to explore, imagine and visualize simple products for built spaces and their functioning to arrive at need-based functional products, which facilitate the users’ needs. The focus was on the aspect of product design with its primary function concerning build spaces and space-related parts of products and design. The design and approach to the product had to be creative and original. The primary design criteria were minimal and straightforward. The product was expected to be simple to manufacture; each part had to be simple and easy to assemble and use. The selected product and approach to design was to be manual and not have an electro-mechanical complexity. The output was in the form of visualisation drawing, analytical drawing, construction drawing, physical scale model, digital model and product prototype. After completing this studio unit, the students were able to: Design through principles in a problem-solving process, where they explored, imagined, visualized and planned a product with simplicity of form, aesthetics, ergonomics and production. The studio focus areas were skills and process application.

87

87

87


88

88

88


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Nihar Godke- Conceptual Development for the element of division Fig 2 Tina Gupta Proposed Iterations of the proposed product Fig 3 Nayonika Gaud Design Principles matrix based on furniture Fig 4 Maulik Soni Design Principles matrix based on architecture

Fig 5 Maulik Soni Proposed element of division with mounting Fig 6 Maulik Soni Spot details for the product Fig 7 Maulik Soni Exploded view of the product Fig 8 Nayonika Gaud Rendered views of the proposed product

Faculty of Design BP4002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

Fig 2

89

89

89


MOVEMENT

RHYTHM

CONTRAST

PATTERN

ERUTE XR ETUTXET COLOUR

ECAPSECAPS FORM

SHAPE

LINE

BALANCE

ENIL ENIL

EPAHSEPAHS

MROFMROF SPACE

RUOLO RCUOLOC TEXTURE

EULAVEULAV VALUE

Fig 3

Fig 4 BALANCE

MOVEMENT MOVEMENT

RHYTHM RHYTHM

CONTRAST CONTRAST

PATTERN PATTERN

90

90

90


Design PG Level-4

Fig 5 Element of Division Collapsible | Visual Barrier | Acoustic Barrier Faculty of Design BP4002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 6 Spot Details

Sheet Metal Mounting

Product Dock

Felt Fabric Cladding

Washer Sheet Metal Felt Fabric

C-Housing Sheet Metal Mounting

Fig 7

Exploded View

91

91

91


Fig 8 92

92

92


BP4006

Building Product Design for Outdoor Spaces

Program Building Products and Systems Unit Assistants Parth Mehta Khushali Kadiwala Faculty of Design BP4006 Monsoon 2021

Students Ajay Nair Antariksh Patole Dhavlesh Suthar Indrajith K Karthik V Nikunj Vaza Prashanth Hebbar Prateeti Jain Priti Trivedi Priyanka T Sachin Srikanth Sreejith S Suman Dey Vaishnavi Iyer Vaishnavi Limaye

Sagar Modh

Vrushank Vyas

The studio aimed to explore, imagine and visualise simple products for built spaces and their functioning to arrive at need-based functional products, which facilitate the users’ needs. The thrust was to identify the need and the design opportunity to develop a new product or redesign the existing product to improve its function, design and relationship to expectations of the user. Students were introduced to product design considerations and structured design processes to be able to apply the same while designing the products. They explored the potential of design with the elements of systems thinking. The design and detail development enabled them to translate the idea into a tangible product: a prototype fit for manufacture. The aspects of product and product graphics were coordinated with market and user feedback to establish product validation. Working drawings and detailed presentation with iterations showing clarity in thinking, illustrated the process behind the design decisions. A prototype 3D Model was also constructed. After completing this studio unit, the students were enabled to: conduct core need identification; understand User/ target Audience; engage in persona Building; comprehend the influence/role of product/ object in the space/system; and present ecosystem mapping

93

93

93


Fig 1 Fig 1 94

94

94


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Ajay, Suman,Indrajit ,Sachin ,Prashant,Priyanka,Nikunj,Antariksh Roofing designs for outdoor spaces . Fig 2 Sachin Srikanth Detailed working drawings for staircase. Fig 3 Nikunj Vaza Form semantics sketches and iterations. Fig 4 Dhavlesh suthar Form semantics Thermocol models.

Fig 5 Priyanka T Form semantics Thermocol models. Fig 6 Antariksh Patole Form semantics sketches and model. Fig 7 Nikunj Vaza ATHER GRID Charging Station Roof design Fig 8 Antariksh Patole Kinetic Roof design for oudoor Container Cafes

Staircase manufacturing drawing Working

Faculty of Design BP4006 Monsoon 2020

Fig 2

Fig 2

95

95

95


Form Semantic

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6 96

96

96


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

ATHER GRID Charging Station To design an identical charging station shade for an electric bike brand. The station provides shade to the rider and a passenger while charging the vehicle Ie at a public EV bike charging station in a city area.

Faculty of Design BP4006 Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

97

97

97


Container Cafes Kinetic Roof for container cafes Problem Statement -To design a roofing system for open seating, dining spaces over shipping containers in urban cafes. Open seating dining areas in container cafes have a scope of utilizing the top of the containers for seating

Fig 8 98

98

98


FD4003

Re-Design Process

Program Furniture Design Unit Assistants Paramdeep Dayani Tanushree Solanki Nidhi Ratani Faculty of Design FD4003 Monsoon 2021

Students Akansha Agarwal Apoorv Garg Apoorvaa Karanjkar Harsh Parmar Kapil Marwaha Mansi Singh Naman Tiwari Nikita Kher Radhika Agarwal Rucharani Kuwar Ruchika Sureka Sathish Kumar Simran Changede

Samir Bhatt

Kaulav Bhagat

This studio explored the interrelationship of Architecture and Furniture design fields. Building and furniture share an affinity with the ground plane, they guide all the forces and loads that reside in or rest on them, downward into the earth. Architecture is furniture at macro scale and furniture is architecture at micro scale. Architecture from different movements of the 20th Century was studied for its innovative use of material, technology, construction, form, structure, details, geometry, and language. The study was conducted through extensive use of drawings, sketches and analytical diagrams. This process helped to synthesize the design principles and issues leading to the design of architecture, which was then taken forward and developed in stages to derive the design of the furniture pieces. The final design was represented with good quality furniture drawings and part prototype. The aim of this studio was to design a table through stage wise evolution of form and geometry, exploration of material properties and testing of the structure. The exercises provided an overview of the furniture design process, established key concepts of furniture design and opened up further design possibilities for students.

99

99

99


100

100

Fig.1

100

100


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 (T-B) Akansha, Rucharani Kuwar, Simran, Apoorva, Harsh Initial Parameter Study Fig 2 (T-B)Apoorva, Rucharani, Apoorv Initial conceptual sketches for design development. Fig 3 (T-B) Apoorva Karanjkar, Simran Changede Process Drawings (B.L & B.R.) Apoorva Karanjkar and Simran Changede 1:5 Scale Model

Fig 4 (T-B) Apoorv Garg Isometric and exploded isometric with respective detailed drawings and 1:5 scaled Model (B.L.) & (B.R.) Rucharani Kuwar 1:5 Scaled Model Fig 5 (T)Rucharani Kuwar - Isometric and exploded isometric drawing (M-B) Nikita Kher Isometric with exploded isometric drawing, Orthographic Plan and elevation drawing, and 1:5 scaled model

Faculty of Design FD4003 Monsoon 2021

Fig. 2

101

101

101


102

102

Fig. 3

102

102


Faculty of Design FD4003 Monsoon 2021

103

Design PG Level-4

Fig. 4

103

103


Fig. 5 104 104

104


FD4011

Furniture For Outdoor

Program Furniture Design Unit Assistant Ahana Sen

Faculty of Design FD4011 Monsoon 2021

Students Aditi Banka Anmol Pareek Md. Arif Ahmed Bhavya Agrawal Meet Thakrar Nivedhitha R Rashmil Rajitha Sarvatha Shukla Sikindar Ali Vaishali Poptani

Sandeep Mukherjee

Prachi Patel

We do not live in isolation and are bound by societal norms where we tend to largely follow the ways of our communities. We eat similar food, we dress similarly, and we travel with similar ideas, and interact accordingly. From childhood we observe our parents and the way of life they follow. In school and college we learn similarly from our peers and friends. All of these influences are the conditioning we go through which makes us who we are as individuals. Sometimes we do not even have the time or space to observe what other societies and cultures are like. We may even look at these as alien and therefore ignore them. The process of design for the outdoors will necessarily force us to study other communities and societies, unlearn a lot of things which are our biases, so as to be able to work towards a ‘just’ design solution. This is critical to the process of good design. The environment is under a lot of pressure as populations across the world grow. Living environments are becoming unlivable as technology advances. As designers who are sensitive and conscious about our micro and macro environment, we need to work to counter this downward spiral. This reflected in our design solutions in terms of materials used, and processes followed.

105

105

105


Fig 1 106 106

106


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Rashmil Rajitha Exploded view of the street furniture. Fig 2 Rashmil Rajitha Rendered views and technical drawings of the street furniture. Fig 3 Aditi Banka Exploded view, technical drawings and rendered view of the street furniture. .Fig 5 Bhavya Agarwal Conceptual sketches and rendered view of the street furniture. Fig 6 Sikindar Ali Technical drawings of outdoor furniture for private residence project. Fig 7 Nivedhitha R. Rendered view of outdoor furniture for private residence

Fig 8 Md Arif Ahmed Rendered view of outdoor furniture for private residence Fig 9 Sarvatha Shukla Conpectual sketches for outdoor furniture for residential complex. Fig 9 Anmol Pareek Conpectual sketches and model for outdoor furniture for residential complex. Fig 10 Meet Thakrar Rendered view of outdoor furniture for residential complex. Fig 11 Rashmil Rajitha Prototype of the street furniture. Fig 12 Mohammad Arif Ahmed Prototype of outdoor furniture for private residence. Fig 13 Vaishali Poptani Prototype of outdoor street furniture.

Faculty of Design FD4003 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

107

107

107


Fig 3 108 108

108


Faculty of Design FD4003 Monsoon 2021

109

Design PG Level-4

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 7

Fig 6

109

109


Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 12

Fig 11

Fig 13 110 110

110


FD4012

Outdoor Furniture

Program Furniture Design Unit Assistant Ahmed Faraz Khan

Faculty of Design FD4012 Monsoon 2021

Students Deepshikha Gupta Palak Bhargava Prachi Sampat Prince Luvani Priyanka Mundra Rutu Patel Soujanya S Bali Vani Janga Virti Shah

Rajendra Mistry

Jaymin Panchasara

The studio began at exploring the properties of rigid and flexible materials and to interchange their properties by making rigid material flexible and vice versa. The students made models to showcase the experience. Next, to enhance the character of the outdoor space aesthetically pleasing and functional furniture pieces are required. The furniture piece should not only adapt human behaviour but also serve as a sculptural element, thus giving a visual identity to the outdoors. Thus, the project brief was to study the existing campuses/ private localities and their outdoors design and develop a furniture piece that enhances the usage and the aesthetic value of the campus. Students studied human behaviour and postures while they were outdoors. They also considered the materials and the production capabilities along with ergonomics, safety measures, recyclability & self-sustainability. Production drawings were prepared and a fullscale prototype was made and tested in the selected environments.

111

111

111


112 112

112


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Deepshika Gupta Site Section Fig 2 Vani Janga Conceptual Sketches Fig 3 Virti Shah Form Exploration through material reduction Fig 4 Palak Bhargava Scaled model Structure Testing Fig 5 Rutu Patel Renders and design arragement Fig 6 Soujanya Bali Exploded View

Fig 7 Saujanya Bali Prototype assembly and components Fig 8 Prince Luvani Bus Stop Prototype Fig 9 Vani Janga Prototype Image Fig 10 Virti Shah Prototype image Fig 11 Deepshika Gupta Prototype image Fig 12 Priyanka Mundra Prototype image Fig 13 Prachi Sampat Prototype image

Faculty of Design FD4012 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

Fig 2

113

113

113


Fig 3

Fig 4 114 114

114


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Design FD4012 Monsoon 2021

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

115

115

115


Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13 116 116

116


ID4008

Dropbox – within the Social Context

Program Interior Design Unit Assistant Rajvi Amrelia

Faculty of Design ID4008 Monsoon 2021

Students Apurva Pandey Ayooshi Jain Dhyey Chag Hithasini R Isha Goel Jhanavi Parikh Mayuri Gohil Prachi Jindal Roshma R Sucheetra Pradhan Uttara Haridas

Mili Parekh Dropbox is a container that is placed within a community settlement to address their needs; it also stimulates the cultural identity of its inhabitants and surrounding. The studio was divided into different parts which taught students to develop an ability to sensitively understand contextual scale in terms of urban interiors. In the first part, the contextual study gave them an understanding of how to comprehend a given site, surrounding and user group. In the Proportion study, they learnt to understand the scale and proportions of an insert in the context of the neighbourhood. In Programme development, students learnt the methods to develop a client brief based on questioning ways of living and needs within the context. Then they came up with an appropriate program along with naming their box and testing it through the selected context (site/program). The ability to analyze, visualize and interpret information as relevant to space designing was covered in concept development and final design insert. Each part had new visualizations in the form of different mediums. Students learnt to represent their analysis, understand and design the concept in the form of visuals, technical drawings and 3D renderings within the social context.

117

117

117


Fig 1 118 118

118


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Group Work All students project poster Fig 2 Apurva Pandey Project section Fig 3 Jhanvi Parikh Project section Fig 4 Hithasini R Project section Fig 5 Prachi Jindal Details and views

Fig 6 Hithasini R Contextual view and interior views Fig 7 Mayuri Gohil-Contextual view and interior views Fig 8 Apurva Pandey Details and views

Faculty of Design ID4008 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

119

119

119


Fig 5 120 120

120


Faculty of Design ID4008 Monsoon 2021

121

Design PG Level-4

Fig 6

Fig 7

121

121


Fig 8 122 122

122


ID4016

Computational Design - Biomimetics

Program Interior Design Unit Assistant Ayushi Agrawal

Faculty of Design ID4016 Monsoon 2021

Students Aashna Chheda Devika Unnikrishnan Harsh Barua Ishita Sahai Namraota Jain Sanjana Sreedhar Shagun Gupta Shiva Shishodia Shivani Vijay Shruti Kohli Siddharth S Sivapriya U Sri Sailesh A Sunya H R Vishakha Soni

Arpi Maheshwari

Radhika Amin

Natural systems are effective in producing material and energy efficient solutions in response to external stimuli and environment. The unit strove to decipher the logic embedded within systems of mathematics, geometry, hierarchical logic, material properties and jointing mechanisms to develop novel interior architectural systems. Can we not just see nature as “forms” but rather learn from the functional principles of natural forms a method that is radically different from today’s methods and systems of construction and design? Adding to this the power of computational design and analytics and digital manufacturing, the industry today is moving towards integrated design solutions with a focus on maximizing system performance. Concepts of variable stiffness, material based mechanics, ventilation strategies; aggregate structures will become the base to develop a material system. [Material system is a system resulting out of the properties inherent to the material or a manipulation of those, in-order to extract maximum desired performance v/s minimum material usage.] Physical modeling was the key to understanding material relationships and for digital calibrations. Various stages of the studio included developing performance active models, clear diagramming, prototyping, detailing and joineries, physical and digital fabrication processes.

123

123

123


Fig 1 124 124

124


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Namraota Jain, Ishita Sahai, Shivani Vijay, Sanjana Shreedhar Integrated design solutions for a large public Interior space Fig 2 Sri Sailesh, Sunya Tessellations using geometry exploration and rotation Fig 3 Shivapriya, Sri Sailesh, Sunya Material system decoding Termite Mound

Fig 3 Namraota Jain, Sanjana Shreedhar Geometrical System decoding Mimosa Pudica as a natural system Fig 4 Aashna Chheda Facade SystemDesign solution using Curve folding Fig 5 &6 Shagun Gupta Facade SystemDesign solution using Auxetics system

Faculty of Design ID4016 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

125

125

125


Fig 3 126 126

126


Faculty of Design ID4016 Monsoon 2021

127

Design PG Level-4

Fig 4

127

127


Fig 5

Fig 6 128 128

128


ID4015-A

The Big Rethink: Interior Materiality

Program Interior Design Unit Assistants Teja Payapalle

Faculty of Design ID4015-A Monsoon 2021

Students Alagappan Swaminathan Anamika Gupta Anishrithi R M Dheepthi Babu Jameela Noufa S Prachi Surana Prochetah Ghosh Shivika Kakar Shirbate Snehal Vinodrao S R Tejashvee

Kireet Patel

Aparajita Basu

The Big Rethink is a series of postgraduate interior design studios focused on developing a multitude of notions, approaches, positions and arguments within the interior design field. This semester, the third one in the series, the studio challenges the concept of Interior Materiality in interior design. It offers an opportunity to develop a design position in different contexts by questioning preconceived notions of interior design. It emphasizes the relationship between Interior materiality and its expression, identity and design outcomes. The first four weeks are a part of the common FD PG Foundation, where students from all streams work together to develop skills and abilities in drawing and making. The latter part of the studio is divided into two modules: the first builds an argument on interior materiality and the second module explores three key roles of an interior designer with each student working on three smaller projects. Role one focuses on practices that work within the context of an ‘era’, role two focuses on practices that are sited within the ‘standardisation’ of the typical floor plan and role three challenges the boundaries between interior design and architecture. The studio focuses on representing experiential and ephemeral qualities, planning and organising strategies, detailing and construction techniques, through the lens of interior materiality.

129

129

129


Fig 1 130 130

130


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Anamika Gupta Constructing an experience Floating Dreams Fig 2 Jameela Noufa Manipulation of singular material to achieve performative elements in a space. Role 01 Historical practices representing an ‘Era’ Fig 3 Prochetah Ghosh The Hellicoid of Da Vinci

Fig 4 Anishrithi R.M.. Material techniques for linear elements aids a sense of locomotion Fig 5 Jameela Noufa Multitudes of Materiality Fig 6 Anamika Gupta Da Vinci’s Cocoons Role 02 Current practices representing ‘Standardisation’ Fig 7 Alagappan Swaminathan Paradoxical Volumes Role 03

Faculty of Design ID4015-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

131

131

131


Role 01 Historical practices representing an ‘Era’

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5 132 132

132


Design PG Level-4

Role 02 Current practices representing ‘Standardisation’

Faculty of Design ID4015-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 6

133

133

133


Role 03 Collaborative practices representing ‘identity’

Fig 7 134 134

134


ID4015-B

The Big Rethink: Interior Materiality

Program Interior Design Unit Assistants Chandni Chhabra

Faculty of Design ID4015-B Monsoon 2021

Students Aarushi Maharshi Devashree Dipak Damodare Divya Gera Katepalli Varshini L Jackson Meitei Niti Chauhan Rohit Garabadu Roshni Kurele Sandra Bijuraj Kodappully Swetha S Tanvi Gupta Vibhuti Kathpalia

Kireet Patel

Rishav Jain

The Big Rethink is a series of postgraduate interior design studios focused on developing a multitude of notions, approaches, positions and arguments within the interior design field. This semester, the third one in the series, the studio challenges the concept of Interior Materiality in interior design. It offers an opportunity to develop a design position in different contexts by questioning preconceived notions of interior design. It emphasizes the relationship between Interior materiality and its expression, identity and design outcomes. The first four weeks are a part of the common FD PG Foundation, where students from all streams work together to develop skills and abilities in drawing and making. The latter part of the studio is divided into two modules: the first builds an argument on interior materiality and the second module explores three key roles of an interior designer with each student working on three smaller projects. Role one focuses on practices that work within the context of an ‘era’, role two focuses on practices that are sited within the ‘standardisation’ of the typical floor plan and role three challenges the boundaries between interior design and architecture. The studio focuses on representing experiential and ephemeral qualities, planning and organising strategies, detailing and construction techniques, through the lens of interior materiality.

135

135

135


Fig 1 136 136

136


Design PG Level-4

Fig 1 Swetha S Constructing an experience-Space expanding to infinity Fig 2 Swetha S Transparency of material as the dominant space making feature Role 01 Historical practices representing an ‘Era’. Fig 3 Jackson L.M. Temporality in volume-Sensorial experience-Module Fig 4 Vibhuti Kathpalia Seamless spiral-Emphasis through visual contrast generates visual balance.

Fig 5 Swetha S Exploration of Layering and gradation in transparencies Fig 6 Roshni Kurele Into the light:Da Vinci’s Vision Role 02 Current practices representing ‘Standardisation’ Fig 7 Divya Gera Constructing an experience through Layering Role 03 Collaborative practices representing ‘identity’

Faculty of Design ID4015-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

137

137

137


Role 01 Historical practices representing an ‘Era’

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5 138 138

138


Design PG Level-4

Role 02 Current practices representing ‘Standardisation’

Faculty of Design ID4015-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 6

139

139

139


Role 03 Collaborative practices representing ‘identity’

Fig 7 140 140

140


141

Ankita Neswanker, Jainam Shah, Radhika Suresh, Shrut Garg UP4001-A, Urban Expansion and Regenaration Planning Studio Jignesh Mehta, Hersh Vardhan Bhasin

141


FACULTY OF PLANNING Postgraduate programs in: Urban Planning Urban Design Urban Housing Urban Infrastructure Urban Transport Systems

142

142


UP4002

Understanding the City Studio

Program Urban Planning

Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

Unit Assistants Aishwarya Shekar Amrutha Balan Giby Abraham Gunjan Jangid Jacob Baby Mallika Sehgal Navnit Sourirajan Shreesha Arondekar Sreedevi N. Kurur Swashya Suresh Tamanna Parvin

Anil Kumar Roy

Arjun Joshi

Narendra Mangwani

Nikta Bhakuni

Ravi Sannabhadti

Rujul Joshi

Students Aakriti Agarwal Aaradhna Mangla Abir Mukherjee Aditi Priya Aditya Dugad Aditya Gagrani Aditya Shrikant Deshmukh Ahmed Sadeed Akanksha S Rao Akash C R Alekhya Pande Amal John Jacob Anjhana M Ankhi Nandi Ansh Dhote Anshima Khare Arundhati Shinde Arushi Gupta Athira Sajeev Atma Deep Dutta Aviral Goyal Ayushi Jain Beneetta Mary Jose Bhavya Mathur Bhutada Akash Shyamsunder Borra Akhil Vardhan Chaitanya Joshi Chimmiri Sai Rashmi Chinchani Archita Ramesh Clinson Chacko Darshan Desai Debabrata Ghosal Deepak Kumar Swain

This Foundation studio aimed to develop intimate understanding of a city and equipped students with conceptual, methodological, analytical, and communication skills necessary for becoming a professional urbanist. This studio focused on an evidencebased approach for framing and analyzing complex urban situations and problems. This studio introduced students to weekly focused exercises to understand different aspects of the city. The students employed mapping, observing, representational and analytical abilities to carefully understand the needs of people, conflicting interests, financial or administrative constraints with the Deepali Singh Dhake Komal Dilip Varsha Dinsha Mathur Dishi Tyagi Divya Mohan Diya Halder Dodiya Smit Ashokbhai Farha Siddiqui Gada Disha Bhavesh Dipti Gajjar Divyaben Nileshbhai Garge Prajakta Prashant Gayathri Dharshini V Gayathri V V Gitika Joshi

Harleen Kaur Bedi Harsha Garg Harshita Mishra Helly Jadeja Himanshi Hina Sharma Irene Antony Ishwarya S Jaimini Santoki Jalvi Contractor Jayakrupa G J Kabhini Mithra Kanimozhi D Kaushal M Y

143

143

143


Rutul Joshi

Rushil Pallavjhala

Umesh Shurpali

Vanishree Herlekar

Tarun Patel

overarching goals of livability, sustainability and equity in a city. . The studio operated in ten parallel units with a studio Tutor and a Teaching Associate guiding a group of 15 students. Occasionally, the students were exchanged between the groups for various exercises. The students were evaluated based on the quality of presentations, clarity of thought and strength of analysis for the predesigned and pre-tested weekly exercises. For this studio, the rigors of student work, the relevance of outputs and healthy relationship for peer-to-peer learning were especially emphasized. Khyati Shah Komirisetty Rohit Kumar Krishna Kant Tiwari Kriti Kesarwani Kritika Kukreti Kruti Barpete Kumaritee Sinha Kushaan Kapur Leena Abbaraju Madhav M Dave Maitry Patel Mahima Prakash Mahima V Varu Makrani Arshil Firozbhai

Malkan Dhyey Pragnesh Manisha Sharma Mayank Gupta Meenal Kangralkar Meher Prathamesh Sudarshan Mohammad Tariq Navaneeth Raj Nikita Bhatt Nikita Kinge Parth Makwana Pooja Vijay Oswal Pranav Joshi Pranjlee Chaporkar Priyadarshini Jain

Purva Borkar R K Nivedhitha Rafa Musadhik Rajat Yadav Rashika Agarwal Ridham Venayak Rituja Lambe Rohan Bhalodiya Rohit R Prabhu Rutvik Bhatt Saayinath Narasimhan Sadiya Anwar Alvi Sagar Kishan Sahana Sale Sajal Tiwari Saman Jain Sapan Hirpara Sapna Manjunath Satvi Himanshu Suresh Shubhangi Saumya Philip Saurabh Sharma Sayan Modak Sayantani Sikdar Shah Prutha Jaydeep Shambhavi Panse Shashwati Yawalkar Shobitha R Shreya Khurana Shubham Jain Shubhi Kushwaha Siddharth Yadav Sindhu S Siya Mulay Srishti Velani Sumedha Wasan Tanisha Sachdeva Tanvi Rahman Tanvi Vinay Sawle Ujwal Gogia Unnati Verma Vaibhav Gupta Varshini S Vedanth Dhal Vinuta Deshpande Viraj Joshi Vyas Vishnu Sanjaykumar Wankhade Anuja Rajesh Zoya Kidwai

144 144

144


Planning PG Level-4 Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

Fig 1 Navaneeth Raj K Precinct Context Ahmedabad Fig 2 Vedanth Dhal Evolution of the precinct - Jharsuguda Fig 3 Divya Mohan Timeline and Trasformation - Ahmedabad Fig 4 Vinuta Deshpande Transformation of Precinct - Rani Chennamma Circle, Hubli Fig 5 Irene Anthony Built form Transformation - Changanacherry Fig 6 Purva Borkar Section of Arterial Road - Vashi, Navi Mumbai Fig 7 Gayathri V V Street character study - Udyan Marg, Ahmedabad Fig 8 Gayathri V V schematic illustration of current - Udyan Marg, Ahmedabad Fig 9 Deepali Singh Public transport connectivity to pedestrian network - Delhi Fig 10 Vedanth Dhal Concept of Neighborhood - Jharsuguda, Odisha, Fig 11 Vedanth Dhal Inter Spatial Diagram Jharsuguda, Odisha, Fig 12 Gayathri V V Plot Ownership Ashram Road, Ahmedabad Fig 13 Shambhavi Panse Evolution of Building height and typology – Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad

Fig 14 Prajakta Garge Population Density - Thaltej, Ahmedabad Fig 15 Navaneeth Raj K Porosity - Memco Cross road, Ahmedabad Fig 16 Divya Mohan Public realm-How perspectives differ? - Gulbai Tekra, Ahmedabad Fig 17 Gayathri V V Access to the street Ashram Road, Ahmedabad Fig 18 Vedanth Dhal Water supply - Jharsuguda, Odisha, Fig 19 Vedanth Dhal Water supply, solid waste and storm water sectional layers Jharsuguda, Odisha, Fig 20 Divya Mohan Reliability and Equity of Infrastructure - Gulbai Tekra, Ahmedabad Fig 21 Saman Jain Sustainable resource utilization – MI Road, Jaipur Fig 22 Divya Mohan Demand parameters of housing type – Gulbai Tekra, Ahmedabad Fig 23 Divya Mohan Factors affecting choices of informal sector and affect of migration on livelihood - Gulbai Tekra, Ahmedabad Fig 24 Deepali Singh Age group of migrants in Delhi Fig 25 Divya Mohan Implications of migration on transport and housing

Fig 1

145

145

145


Fig 2

Fig 3 146 146

146


Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

147

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 4

Fig 5

147

147


Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9 148 148

148


Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

149

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 10

149

149


Fig 11

Fig 12 150 150

150


Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

151

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 13

Fig 14

151

151


Fig 15

Fig 16

Fig 17 152 152

152


Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

153

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 18

Fig 19

153

153


Fig 20

Fig 21

Fig 22 154 154

154


Faculty of Planning UP4002 Monsoon 2021

155

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 23

155

155


Fig 24

Fig 25 156 156

156


UP4001-A

Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio Program Urban Planning Unit Assistants Arun Kumar Pavithra Nelson Shyamantika Sarkar Faculty of Planning UP4001-A Monsoon 2021

Jignesh Mehta Students Ankita Neswankar Anushree Harde Dania Mary George Harshin M Nagecha Jainam Shah Manojna Polisetty Mohamed Inam Ulla Khan Neha Patil Niharika Gupta Parth Rathod Prakhar Suresh Sharma Radhika Suresh Rohini Chatterjee Ruchi Bharadwaj Sairy Jain Shruti Garg Sourabh Raj Sukanya Guha Uma Sharma Vishnupriya V

Hersh Vardhan Bhasin

Majority of the cities in India are growing rapidly due to rapid urbanization. Many of them prepare macro level plans (Development Plans and Master Plans) to manage future growth. However, these plans mainly focus on overall zoning, trunk infrastructure network and broad-brush regulations, and generally fail to ensure its implementation through coherent, high quality and sustainable development at local levels. In this context, this studio is focused on developing core competencies in students for preparing micro level plans for both, greenfield (through TPS) and brownfield areas (through LAP), which go beyond conventional approaches, and integrate multi-disciplinary aspects. In this studio, the students prepare Local Area Plans and Town Planning Schemes in different cities such as Mumbai, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Rajkot, Surat and Vadodara. After reviewing existing situation, statutory provisions and stakeholder consultations, they develop a vision and proposals for street network, zoning, infrastructure, green network etc and explore ways to implement them through land reconstitution, incentivized redevelopment and other strategies after estimating compensation and contribution from each land parcel. Multiple presentations by external experts and practitioners are conducted throughout the semester to facilitate the learning.

157

157

157


Fig 1

Fig 12 158 158

158


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Master Plan & Proposals Fig 2 Ankita, Jainam, Radhika, Shruti Built Form: Exisiting and Proposed Fig 3 Dania,Manojna,Parth, Vishnupriya Heritage TDR & Zoning Fig 4 Dania,Manojna,Parth, Vishnupriya Proposed Heritage TDR List Fig 5 Niharika, Prakhar, Rohini, Ruchi Green Blue Network Fig 6 Ankita, Jainam, Radhika, Shruti Conceptual Approach

Fig 7 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Development Control Regulation Fig 8 Niharika, Prakhar, Rohini, Ruchi High Intensity Mixed Use Zone Fig 9 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Street section Fig 10 Anushree, Inam , Neha, Sukanya Master Plan Nava Vadaj Fig 11 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Implementation feasibility : Costing Fig 12 Anushree, Inam , Neha, Sukanya Envisioned Built Form 3D

Faculty of Planning UP4001-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 3

Fig 4

159

159

159


Fig 5

Fig 6 160 160

160


Faculty of Planning UP4001-A Monsoon 2021

161

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

161

161


Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12 162 162

162


UP4001-B

Urban Expansion and Regeneration Planning Studio Program Urban Planning Unit Assistants Pavithra Nelson Shyamantika Sarkar

Faculty of Planning UP4001-B Monsoon 2021

Students Abhay Kumar Nigam Ananya Jain Ankita Panchratna Apaar Srivastava Bhuvaneshwari M Eilaaf Fatima Ansari Harshita Sehgal Indraja Kokate Khevna Vaishnav Khushbu Bassi D Kirti Chandra Kriti Khetrapal Kunj Belani Kusha Goyal Nikita Sharma Nisha Sharma Rahul Mallick Rakshit Nag Sakshi Saxena Sanjana Baidya Shubhi Chawla Soumya Pathak Sourabh Anand Vidushi Kajla Yash Kotgirwar

Utkarsh Patel

Amit Gotecha

Majority of the cities in India are growing rapidly due to rapid urbanization. Many of them prepare macro level plans (Development Plans and Master Plans) to manage future growth. However, these plans mainly focus on overall zoning, trunk infrastructure network and broad-brush regulations, and generally fail to ensure its implementation through coherent, high quality and sustainable development at local levels. In this context, this studio is focused on developing core competencies in students for preparing micro level plans for both, greenfield (through TPS) and brownfield areas (through LAP), which go beyond conventional approaches, and integrate multi-disciplinary aspects. In this studio, the students prepare Local Area Plans and Town Planning Schemes in different cities such as Mumbai, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Rajkot, Surat and Vadodara. After reviewing existing situation, statutory provisions and stakeholder consultations, they develop a vision and proposals for street network, zoning, infrastructure, green network etc and explore ways to implement them through land reconstitution, incentivized redevelopment and other strategies after estimating compensation and contribution from each land parcel. Multiple presentations by external experts and practitioners are conducted throughout the semester to facilitate the learning.

163

163

163


Fig 1 164 164

164


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Master Plan & Proposals Fig 2 Ankita, Jainam, Radhika, Shruti Built Form: Exisiting and Proposed Fig 3 Dania,Manojna,Parth, Vishnupriya Heritage TDR & Zoning Fig 4 Dania,Manojna,Parth, Vishnupriya Proposed Heritage TDR List Fig 5 Niharika, Prakhar, Rohini, Ruchi Green Blue Network Fig 6 Ankita, Jainam, Radhika, Shruti Conceptual Approach

Fig 7 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Development Control Regulation Fig 8 Niharika, Prakhar, Rohini, Ruchi High Intensity Mixed Use Zone Fig 9 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Street section Fig 10 Anushree, Inam , Neha, Sukanya Master Plan – Nava Vadaj Fig 11 Harshin, Sairy, Sourabh, Uma Implementation feasibility : Costing Fig 12 Anushree, Inam , Neha, Sukanya Envisioned Built Form 3D

Faculty of Planning UP4001-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

165

165

165


Fig 4

Fig 5 166 166

166


Faculty of Planning UP4001-B Monsoon 2021

167

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

167

167


Fig 9

Fig 10 168 168

168


UD4001-A

Master Plan Studio

Program Urban Design Unit Assistant Shradha Gupta

Faculty of Planning UD4001-A Monsoon 2021

Students Abhilash Barbade Arijit Dhar Dhairya Wadhwa Digvijay Singh Ismat Patel Mohammad Saad Yazdani Pravat Singh Prerna Yadav Samriddhi jain Shivam Adhikary Siddhesh Nachane

Brijesh Bhatha

Purvi Bhatt

The studio focused on preparing Master Plans for large green field developments in peri-urban areas. To respond to the demand of expansion in the rapidly growing urban centers, governments facilitate such new developments through various development mechanisms. The studio operated within the existing development framework of the Integrated Township Policy which is a typically developer driven activity and involved design on a large tract of land under single ownership. The design of the project involved preparing a three dimensional urban design master plan with strategies of street network and urban block, public open spaces, public amenities and infrastructure, integration of public transport systems, strategies for pedestrian and vehicular priority on streets, defining the building height and bulk, building uses and landscape strategy. Students were required to prepare an urban design master plan for these developments with an emphasis on creating liveable neighbourhoods that explore the ideas of future living through their designs. The design process consistently retained its focus on how these ideas can be translated into reality. The studio outcome also involved preparing effective representation graphics and persuasive communication strategy for the design project.

169

169

169


Integrated Green blue corridor

Storm water reservoir lake

the continuous green corridor along the storm water channel carrying the block public open spaces and connecting each district through nmt tracks running across dense ecology.

Central Spine

The main spine of the neighbourhood surmounting commercial at the ends and mixed residential in the middle

IT office hub

Co-working spaces

Fig 1 Central spine

Blue- green loop

Community buildings activating the green blue loop

Public green fingers

Fig 2

Fig 2 170 170

170


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Shivan Adhikary Masterplan Projecting Urban Nature Fig 2 Shivan Adhikary Urban Block Module across Districts. Fig 3 Digvijay Singh Open Space Strategies Fig 4 Digvijay Singh Interconnected porous open spaces Fig 5 Shivan Adhikary Life along BlueGreen Loop. Fig 6 Pravat Singh Isometric View of Residential District. Fig 7 Pravat Singh Pravat Singh Section Demonstrating Hierarchy of Programs within Neighborhood Level Open Space

Faculty of Planning UD4001-A Monsoon 2021

Distribution and hierarchy of open spaces

Fig 8 Samriddhi Jain Integrated township Master Plan Fig 9 Samriddhi Jain Mixed use district Isometric view Fig 10 Samriddhi Jain Green trail with productive landscapes Fig 11 Arijit Dhar Active township master plan. Fig 12 Arijit Dhar Language of the green spine. Fig 13 Arijit Dhar Green spine opens up into an existing water body, creating a vibrant public place aligned with activities at different levels.

Active edge aligned to Open Spaces

Scale of Open Spaces along Neighbourhood

Fig 3

Fig 4

171

171

171


Pocket Activity generators

(library/cafeteria/take away canteen/ biology centers/ community center/exhibition/art and craft)

Paved corridor with continuous cycle track

Open gym

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7 172 172

172


Planning PG Level-4

Green front District 3bhk, 4bhk Apartments TheLake city level spaces frontopen park as city alligned the socio level with public place Commercial corridor along main road

Lake front District 4-side open luxury 4bhk Apartments Farmers’ market to sell the produce

Clubhouse and other

Mixed use District 2bhk, 3bhk, 4bhk Apartments Sports field/ Celebration ground

Productive landscapes along NMT network

Canal front District Low rise bungalows

Faculty of Planning UD4001-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 8 Green trail with productive landscapes, kiosks for selling produce and

Recreational zone for residents

Private green-building edge Vending zone, workshops

Active building edge due to spill over of

Fig 9 Fruit plantations

Kiosks for selling fresh produce, eateries, workshops and other community activities

Community farming People coming together for food production

Fig 10

173

173

173


The city level open spaces alligned with the socio Commercial Corridoor along the primary road network.

Green Spine, connection diverse open spaces within Neighbourhood Public Space. Bungalows strategically placed at the peripheries of the master plan within a calm setup.

Fig 11 Understanding the alignment of different typology of built-use along the green spine throughout the 1. Cross Overs

2. Walkways at levels.

3. Sittings infront of Retail Stores.

1. Blending into the wetlands.

2. Community open space.

3. Retail on both sides.

Fig 12

Fig 13 174 174

174


UD4001-B

Master Plan Studio

Program Urban Design Unit Assistant Shradha Gupta

Faculty of Planning UD4001-B Monsoon 2021

Students Elaine Agith Imad Patel Keerthana Jayaseelan Manasa R Neha Patane Priy Bhushan Pronab Biswas S N Sai Sanketh Sharmi.Ra Tejal Bagwe Vignesh Basil

Brijesh Bhatha

Vipuja Parmar

The studio focused on preparing Master Plans for large green field developments in peri urban areas.To respond to the demand of expansion in the rapidly growing urban centres, governments facilitate such new developments through various development mechanisms. The studio operated within the existing development framework of the Integrated Township Policy which is a typically developer driven activity and involved design on a large tract of land under single ownership. The design of the project involved preparing a three dimensional urban design master plan with strategies of street network and urban block, public open spaces, public amenities and infrastructure, integration of public transport systems, strategies for pedestrian and vehicular priority on streets, defining the building height and bulk, building uses and landscape strategy. Students were required to prepare an urban design master plan for these developments with an emphasis on creating livable neighbourhoods that explore the ideas of future living through their designs. The design process consistently retained its focus on how these ideas can be translated into reality. The studio outcome also involved preparing effective representation graphics and persuasive communication strategy for the design project.

175

175

175


Low Density Residential Blocks

Nature Trails

Sports Centre

Public Open Space High density mixed use blocks Pedestrian Corridors Institutes

47%

2.1

Open Space

FSI Consumed

Fig 1

Cycle & Pedestrian Paths Common Open Space Neighborhood Open Space

Commercial Hub With Public Transport

Fig 2 176 176

176


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Neha Patane Masterplan demonstrating liveable neighhoods Fig 2 Priy Bhushan Neighbourhood Districts Healthy & Integrated Social Living Fig 3 Sanketh Sriram Residential block showing active and safe neighbourhood Fig 4 Sanketh Sriram Commercial District Depicting Celebratory Open Spaces Fig 5 Sanketh Sriram Integrated Township Demonstrating Life Within A Garden Fig 6 Priy Bhushan Neighbourhood Dis tricts: Healthy & Integrated Social Living

Fig 7 Sharmi Ra Mixed Use Block Promoting Healthy, Nature Based Living Fig 8 Manasa R Compact Mixed Use Living Cluster Fig 9 Imad Patel Masterplan Demonstrating Interconnected Green Living Fig 10 Manasa R Sector Level Open Spaces Integrated with Amenities Fig 11 Sharmi Ra Sector Level Open Spaces Integrated with Amenities

Faculty of Planning UD4001-B Monsoon 2021

Place for Vendors Corner Plazas

Common Amenities

Fig 3 Active Podiums

Sports Plaza

Celebration Space

Boulevard Street

Public Park

Transit Nodes

Fig 4

177

177

177


Commercial Spine attracts the people to township and directs devlopment of township

Amenities along the green spine acts as activity generators

Green spine integrates enitire township and infuses experience of living in garden

Transit Nodes which are at junctions of commercial corridor are easily accessible from any part of township

Green Fingers with pedestrain tacks and the activitiy generators makes the residential blocks active and safe

Fig 5

Residential Block Private spaces = better living style Common open spaces = social life

School Road networks provide good connectivity within and outside the township

Commercial Hub with Public Transportation Junction provides health and infrastructure services with public/ sharing transportation system

Central Plaza A central space for public gatherings and celebrations

Retail Private spaces = better living style Common open spaces = social life

Botanical Park Public accessible park with plants and farming

Cycle Track Provide connectivity and good relationship with neighbour

Fig 6 178 178

178


Planning PG Level-4

Central Green Shopping Centre

NMT Pathway

School College

Faculty of Planning UD4001-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

LIVE . WORK. PLAY Compact Mixed Use Living Cluster High-rise residential mixed use Coworking Spaces + Offices Terrace Gardens + Solar Panel Communal Spaces Central Green Lung Social Gathering Healthcare + Learning Centre Farm Produce Integrated Urban Farming

Water catchment + Air purification + Microclimate

Vertical Farming Social Amenities Food Processing + Community Kitchens

Fig 8

179

179

179


Medium Density District

Medium Density District

Neighbourhood Open Space

High Density Mixed Use District Low Density District Biodiversity Park IT Park

Private Open Space Bungalow District Green Trails

IT Park Vehicular Entry Hospital Public Plaza Pedestrian Entry Commercial Complex

High Density Mixed Use District Central Open Space

Shopping Complex Vehicular Entry

Community Gathering SEWS District IT Park

Fig 9 Mixed Use Cluster

Raised Loop

Integrated Farming

Green Belt

Apartment Cluster

Fig 10

Fig 11 180 180

180


UD4001-C

Master Plan Studio

Program Urban Design Unit Assistant Shradha Gupta

Faculty of Planning UD4001-C Monsoon 2021

Students Aiswarya Raj Apoorva Janawad Joshi Aditi Ajay Jugal Bhatt Krushna Lahoti Pooja Sharma Rutuja Nivate Sakshi Pugalia Srishti Sudhera Varsha Venkatesh Vidhi Shah

Brijesh Bhatha

Sophiya Islam

The studio focused on preparing Master Plans for large green field developments in peri-urban areas. To respond to the demand of expansion in the rapidly growing urban centers, governments facilitate such new developments through various development mechanisms. The studio operated within the existing development framework of the Integrated Township Policy which is a typically developer driven activity and involved design on a large tract of land under single ownership. The design of the project involved preparing a three dimensional urban design master plan with strategies of street network and urban block, public open spaces, public amenities and infrastructure, integration of public transport systems, strategies for pedestrian and vehicular priority on streets, defining the building height and bulk, building uses and landscape strategy. Students were required to prepare an urban design master plan for these developments with an emphasis on creating liveable neighbourhoods that explore the ideas of future living through their designs. The design process consistently retained its focus on how these ideas can be translated into reality. The studio outcome also involved preparing effective representation graphics and persuasive communication strategy for the design project.

181

181

181


School

The open space adjning the building is an educational park for giving the students hands on experience while learning

Commercial Edge

Retail shops along the proposed DP road to keep the edge active throughout

Multi modal integration Hub

Institute

Theopen space adjoining the building is an educational park

Space for interchange of mode of transport to NMT

Canal Front Park

Public Plaza

An extension of the public open space

This marks an entry to the site which introduces the NMT Loop

Bungalows

EWS Housing NMT Green Loop

There is a dedicated lane for NMT infrastructure which connects the entire township.

Multi modal integration Hub Space for interchange of mode of transport to NMT

Community Space

Social gatherings can take place here which can spill over into the public open space

Commercial Edge

Retail shops along the proposed DP road to keep the edge active throughout

Theme Parks

A trail of educational parks is developed which connects people to the nature

Community Sports Area

Events like Garba, live shows can take place in this open maidan

Podium Terraces

Space for community activities in the neighbourhood district

Fig 1 Public Plaza

Chamferred edges help in recieving people in a welcoming manner

NMT Priority Zone

Establishing E-shuttle service and public bicycle sharing for easy accessibility

Balcony projections

Overlooking the NMT Loop, keeping eyes on the street

Fig 2 NMT Priority Zones Public bicycle sharing is promoted within the neighbourhoods

Community Plaza

Chamferred edges help in recieving people in a welcoming manner

Accessible friendly neighbourhoods

Fig 3 182 182

182


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Aditi Joshi Master Plan- Social Connect within the Greens Fig 2 Aditi Joshi Character Image of the NMT Loop Fig 3 Aditi Joshi Public Plaza near Community Block Fig 4 Vidhi Shah Evolution of the Urban Form Fig 5 Vidhi Shah View of Private Open Spaces in the Neighbourhood Fig 6 Apoorva Janawad Master PlanGreen Abobe Fig 7 Apoorva Janawad Streets as Urban Park

Fig 8 Rutuja Nivate Master Plan- Connected Green Communities Fig 9 Rutuja Nivate Key design strategy diagram Fig 10 Rutuja Nivate Evolution of Urban Block Fig 11 Jugal Bhatt Master Plan- Self Sufficient Community Living Fig 12 Jugal Bhatt Master Plan Strategy Diagram Fig 13 Sakshi Pugalia Evolution of Urban Form

Faculty of Planning UD4001-C Monsoon 2021

Access Points

Fig 4

Height Variation

Building use

Chamfered Edges

Commercial Building

Mixed use

Green connectors

Pathways

Residential building

Fig 5

183

183

183


Schools and Institutes

it

Area level Open Spaces (Semi-Public)

Ex Entry Main

Interactive & Active Recreational Zones

Affordable Housing

5% of the total plot areas is developed as a EWS housing as per the township policy

y Exit ary Entr Second

Blue - Green Corridor (City Level Open Space, Public)

Commercial spine

The central blue green corridor with pedestrian street act as urban living spine with Active & Passive recreational areas & ecosystems that weaves all open spaces together

Commercial buildings with retail in the ground and first floor. Direct access from the street through a public promenade

Sports complex

in Ma

ry Ent

t Exi

With community centre, health centre and club house. Central attracting element. Easy access from every side

Mixed Use Edge

Community level open spaces (Private and Enclosed)

Serve immediate neighbourhoods & Community nodes to meet daily essential needs of the residents

Se

y dar con

ry Ent

Mixed use buildings with retail commercial in podium

t Exi

High End Apartments and Bungalows Overlooking canal front, golf course & area level open spaces

Fig 6

Bioswales Stormwater planter

Dedicated bicycle

Complete Streets

Shared street with Permeable Pavement

Maximum Green cover & Permeable surfaces

Triangulation Ancillary activities on ground floor

Flexible seating

Street Furniture

Solar street lighting and signages

Permeable pavement parking lane

Fig 7 184 184

184


Planning PG Level-4 Faculty of Planning UD4001-C Monsoon 2021

Commercial Plaza Transitionary plaza as an entry to the township

Commercial Frontage Mixed Commercial Podium

Shopping Complex Acts as an identity for the township

Hospital External access from the DP road connecting other residential areas

Commercial Edge Retail shops along the proposed DP road to keep the edge active

Neighbourhood Level Park In proximity of the EWS block

Central Green Spine Bioswale and NMT loop along with several recreational spaces

Recreation Zone Public amenities like theatre, sports centre, cultural centre, exhibition hall, library, etc

Non-Retail Commercial External access from the DP road

Fig 8

Holding ponds connected with a continuous bioswale

L

CA

RA

NAL

Activated green corridor along the bioswale

L

U LT

RA

NAL

U LT

U LT

U LT

CA

IC U

IC U

IC U

IC U L

AG R

AG R

AG R

AG R

RA

CA

RA

NAL

Network of hierarchical green open spaces

L

CA

NAL

Green pockets as opportunities for community interactions

Fig 9

Peripheral block with internal open space

Fig 10

Restricting the building lengths to increase block porosity

Tertiary street cuts the block into halves, providing vehicular entries to the blocks

Stepback after two commercial floors | Lowered heights at the corners

185

185

185


Mixed Use Towers

G+2 with Commercial and above it 12-13 storey residential apartment creates diversity along the DP road

Township Experience Center

Work & Stay Apartments

Located at the main entrance to direct and assist visitors

2, 3 BHK Apartments

City level Commercial District

Districts along the DP road with mixed use office building at the periphery and housing at the core

Largely belongs to service class people and daily commuters to city and surrounding districts

Social District

Culmination of office building and residential apartment together

Amenity Core

Heart of township includes urban park, community centre, sport center, primary health care, and institutional spaces like schools colleges and skill development

3 BHK Apartment

Premium apartment facing the wide DP road

Mixed use Towers

G+2 with Commercial and above it 12-13 storey residential apartment

EWS Housing Connected to DP road to establish a separate entrance to the parcel

Fig 11

Development of spine, with leaving roads on two edges

Idea of creating variety of spine characteristics

Opening towards canal edge to make it more porous and active

Fig 12

Creating an Envelope

Residential Perimeter Block

Allowing Accessibility, Light and Ventilation

Activating the Street Edge

Fig 13 186 186

186


UH4001

Housing Project Studio

Program Urban Housing Unit Assistant Nandana L S

Faculty of Planning UH4001 Monsoon 2021

Students Aishwarya Joshi Akshay M Akshita Porwal Annesha Dasgupta Anu Ajith Ashwini Paliwal Hasti Bhatt Kritee Mondal Manthan Dhanani Meera Soni Meet Patel Nithya Ravindra Nupur Aitawdekar Padmashri V Pratyusha Jain Rhythm Jaiswal Udisha Bhattacharya Vaidehi Joshi Yasin Kabaria

Madhu Bharti

Rutool Sharma

The focus of the studio was to expose the students to the dynamic real estate market. This studio encourages each student to develop a finacially viable and implimentable project on a site which can be up for the development in near future. This studio took up a series of greenfield/ brownfield sites across a city based on variation in terms of predominant land use, location, accessibility, market conditions and other local market characters. Each student developed the site as per the existing demand for real-estate, the status of micro markets including production rate, unsold inventory and vacancy. Students developed their skills for land potential analysis and applied the process on a few sites to select the final site for detailed project development. They studied the linkages and significant relevance of each micromarket to the local employment generation magnets to prepare an implementable project with adherence to all the existing regulations and policies. The final output of a comprehensive project proposal included details for financial resource development for the project. This gave the students an opportunity to understand the intersection of real estate and financial markets and prepared them for the housing/ real estate industry.

187

187

187


Fig 1 188 188

188


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Studio Schedule & Selected Sites Fig 2 Aishwarya Joshi, Vaidehi Joshi Site Selection and Land Potential Analysis Fig 3 Akshita Porwal, Rhythm Jaiswal Site Profile and Neighbourhood Context Fig 4 Anu Ajith,Hasti Bhatt Legal Aspects Fig 5 Kritee Mondal, Nupur Aitawdekar Macro Market Analysis

Fig 6 Nithya Ravindra Micro Market Analysis Fig 7 Ashwini Paliwal, Akshay M Micro Market Inferences Fig 8 Yasin Kabaria Project Iterations Fig 9 Kritee Mondal Activity Scheduling Fig 10 Padmashri V Conceptual Layout Fig 11 Meet Patel Sensitivity Analysis

Faculty of Planning UH4001 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

189

189

189


Fig 4

Fig 5 190 190

190


Faculty of Planning UH4001 Monsoon 2021

191

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

191

191


Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11 192 192

192


UI4001

Infrastructure Project Studio

Program Urban Infrastructure Unit Assistant Smeet Maniar

Faculty of Planning UI4001 Monsoon 2021

Students Anuj Chandak Anushka Patodi Ipsita Subudhi Jhanvi Shah Moksh Jain Palak Shah Pemmasani Harshitha Sakshi Darak Sayandeep Chakraborty Snehal Ingole Surya Thakkar

Mona Iyer

Meera Mehta

The absence of a comprehensive city wide infrastructure plan and an inadequate understanding or attention to cross cutting issues in water and sanitation sector often results in poor project formulation. It is possible to improve on this by developing integrated projects within the framework of comprehensive urban water and sanitation plan. This studio focused on developing integrated infrastructure projects for storm-water, water, sanitation and solid waste management for a given city and its immediate periphery. This year the case city was Ahmadabad, Gujarat. Infrastructure development activities for these sectors whether in public or private domain, involve plan preparation, project formulation and implementation. These required it to be supported with appropriate institutional, technical and financial analysis. The learning from this studio equips students with wider understanding of plan formulation process; tools and techniques of project identification, costing and phasing to ensure service performance improvements and resource efficiency for aforementioned key water-sanitation sectors. The projects were identified with due consideration to on-going national programmes and emerging sectoral concepts of integrated urban water management, and to water sensitive urban planning and design, circular economy, fecal sludge and septage management.

193

193

193


Fig 1 194 194

194


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Introduction Group History of WASH in Ahmedabad. Fig 2 Water Group Assessment of & Participation in Water Sector in Ahmedabad.

Fig 3 Stormwater Group Exisitng Situation of Storm water in the city. Fig 4 UWSH Group Assessment of the UWSH situation in the city. Fig 5 Solid Waste Group Value chain of Solid waste in Ahmedabad.

Faculty of Planning UI4001 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

195

195

195


Fig 3 196 196

196


Faculty of Planning UI4001 Monsoon 2021

197

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 4

197

197


Fig 5 198 198

198


UI4004

Infrastructure Project Studio (WASH)

Program Urban Infrastructure Unit Assistant Smeet Maniar

Faculty of Planning UI4004 Monsoon 2021

Students Aeshvry Rajaura Akshayveer Rathore Hitesh Pandit Janhavi Singh Karan Patil Nirali Shah Prachi Chirania Priyanka Sen Pushpak Sahu

Mona Iyer

Meera Mehta

Siddh Doshi

The absence of a comprehensive city wide infrastructure plan and an inadequate understanding or attention to cross cutting issues in water and sanitation sector often results in poor project formulation. It is possible to improve on this by developing integrated projects within the framework of comprehensive urban water and sanitation plan. This studio focuses on developing integrated infrastructure projects for stormwater, water, sanitation and solid waste management for a given city and its immediate periphery. This year the case city was Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Infrastructure development activities for these sectors whether in public or private domain, involve plan preparation, project formulation and implementation. This requires to be supported with appropriate institutional, technical and financial analysis. The learning from this studio equips students of the wider understanding of plan formulation process; tools and techniques of project identification, costing and phasing to ensure service performance improvements and resource efficiency for aforementioned key water-sanitation sectors. The projects are identified with due consideration to on-going national programmes and emerging sectoral concepts of integrated urban water management, water sensitive urban planning and design, circular economy, fecal sludge and septage management.

199

199

199


Fig 11 Fig 200 200

200


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Introduction Group History of WASH in Ahmedabad. Fig 2 Pushpak Sahu Concept Master Plan for Downstream Sabarmati. Fig 3 Prachi Chirania Roadmap for Circular Economy of Recyclable Waste in Ahmedabad.

Fig 4 Karan Patil FSSM within AMC Limits and Periphery villages.. Fig 5 Nirali Shah Blue Infrastructure for Storm Water Management

Faculty of Planning UI4004 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

201

201

201


Fig 3 202 202

202


Faculty of Planning UI4004 Monsoon 2021

203

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 4

203

203


Fig 5 204 204

204


UT4003

Transportation Detailed Feasibility Project Studio Program Urban Transport Unit Assistant Madhura Kawadkar

Faculty of Planning UT4003 Monsoon 2021

Students Aditya Chintawar Aishwarya Aniket Wakhare Deepti Patil Katabathinieshwar Kavita Patil Kumar Kunal Lakshmi R Malavika K R Minal Shetty Mohit Pandya Nidhi Piludaria Ravi Sharma Renjitha R N Sarah Alexander Shravya N Suhasini Verma Tanuta Pal Vasuk Chourasiya Yashraj Panchal

Shivanand Swamy

Khelan Modi

Nivesh Chaudhary

This studio aimed to provide students with an understanding of the preparation of a detailed market and traffic feasibility assessment report for urban logistics infrastructure proposals. The students undertook data collection with respect to cargo demand, transport supply characteristics, demand-supply gap, and available infrastructure in the case study city/ region. Based on the demand and supply analysis, and economic assessment of the region, the students developed a Feasibility Assessment Report, which included a forecast of target cargo traffic in the proposed facility. The student also undertook a financial and economic analysis of the proposed infrastructure. This studio aimed at establishing cargo demand and the quantum and nature of possible future inward and outward

205

205

205


Fig 1 206 206

206


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Aniket, Aishwarya, Sarah Industries & freight scenario in Ahmedabad Fig 2 Suhasini, Tanuta & Mohit O-D pair and type of containers Fig 3 Nidhi Quantum Analysis Fig 4 Eshwar & Lakshmi Overview of GIDC Naroda Fig 5 Minal & Renjitha CVC at Entry and Exit – Naroda GIDC

Fig 6 Kunal Existing storage facilities at GIDC Naroda Fig 7 Group work Issue identification Fig 8 Mohit & Aiswarya Proposed inward Vehicle flow at truck terminal Fig 9 Renjitha & Minal Proposed infrastructure facility at GIDC Naroda Fig 10 Deepti Patil Proposed valueadded services like Truck terminal and warehouse at GIDC Naroda

Faculty of Planning UT4003 Monsoon 2021

Fig 2

Fig 3

207

207

207


Fig 4

Fig 5 208 208

208


Faculty of Planning UT4003 Monsoon 2021

209

Planning PG Level-4

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

209

209


Fig 9

Fig 10 210 210

210


F

P B F In

F

P U

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE

F

Postgraduate programs in: Architectural Design Architectural History and Theory Conservation and Regeneration

P U U U U U

Sarkhej Group UM 4004-A Nimitt Karia, Kruti Zaveri

211

211


FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT Postgraduate programs in: Urban Management

212

Name Line1 Line2

212


UM4002-A

Service Operations Management Studio

Program Urban Management Unit Assistant Bhargav Pandit

Students Aakriti Katya Garg Vedantam Vaasanthi Chitrakshi Pramod Shirke Jahnvi Pathak Kaviya Shree K R Shreyashi Soni Animesh Mehta Sampurna Sarangi Akshita Anand

Gayatri Doctor

Anoop Khajuria

Service organizations respond to the requirements of users to satisfy some needs and leave certain experiences in the minds of the users through a service delivery system. This studio addressed the design, operational and strategic aspects of managing service systems. Service Operations Management (SOM) focuses on how firms can deliver excellent service while achieving success. Current practice reveals a lack of widespread understanding of effective service management. This course took the position that there is enormous potential to improve services. The studio was designed to equip students with the concepts and tools to do so. Students learned to design distinctive and sustainable service strategies, to manage users and employees, to leverage data to enhance performance, and to reshape their organizations to suit evolving users’ needs and changing competitive landscapes. Students learned different tools and techniques of operations and management in assessing the efficiency of urban services. The learning outcomes were realized by appropriate case studies through different exercises

213 213

213


STUDIO OBJECTIVE Service Operations Management Studio is designed toaddress the design, operational and strategic aspects of managing service systems

Faculty of Management UM4002-A Monsoon 2021

could be a single trait images sent

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Old Service Concept

Gap Analysis

NewService Concept

Proposals

Designdistinctiveandsustainableservicestrategies Leveragedatatoenhanceperformance Reshapeorganizationstosuit evolvingusersneeds

Citizen Civic Centers in Ahmedabad, Gujarat

Gujarat

Ahmedabad

VISION

Central Zone

North-West Zone

“ Facilitate the efficient and high quality Municipal Services while enhancing the existing infrastructure.”

GOALS

Service operations with technology improvement (Technology and processing) Enhanced capacity building for employees (Human resource)

Provide efficient way finding (Citizen movement and space design) (Design and layout)

Awareness among citizens towards digitization (Citizen awareness) Promote efficiency, accountability, and transparency (Finance and Contracts)

Fig 1

214

214

214


Fig 1 Aakriti Studio Introduction Fig 2 Shreyashi Soni, Katya Garg IEC Poster- How to avail a service? Fig 3 Shreyashi Soni, Katya Garg IEC Poster- Guidelines from AMC Fig 4 Vedantam Vaasanthi Literature Review of CCCs Fig 5 Jahnvi Pathak, Sampurna Sarangi Citizen Survey Fig 6 Akshita Anand, Chitrakshi Shikre Major Gaps

Fig 2

Fig 3 1 Fig

Common Area of Study About City Civic Centers (CCCs) Timeline for CCCs Services Provided

Ottawa

9 National Cities

CCCFunctioning Key Performance Indicators Gap Areas

3 International Cities Vietnam One-Stop Shops (Country) Pancevo

Fig 7 Animesh Mehta, Kaviya Shree Areas of Improvement Fig 5 Animesh Mehta, Vedantam Vaasanthi Organization Structure of CCCs Fig 9 Jahnvi Pathak, Sampurna Sarangi Space Movement and Management Fig 10 Akshita Anand, Chitrakshi Shikre Proposed AMC Web Portal Fig 11 Aakriti and Kaviya Shree Service Audit Profile

Citizen Service Centre

Client Service Centre

Civic Centre Common Service Centre Centre for Civil Services Citizen Facilitation Centre Saukaryam Centre Citizen Facilitation Centre Citizen Service Centre PMC Care 2.0

Delhi Faridabad Jaipur Jamshedpur Mumbai Vizag Pimpri Chinchwad Hyderabad Pune

Online Service

Fig 4

215 215

215


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4002-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

216

216

216


govt agencies

AMC

E-GOV CELL

OutsourcedHUMAN RESOURCE SUPPORT

CITY CIVIC CENTER NODAL OFFICER

ent

CCC IN-CHARGE

Software Support

Financial and Transaction Support

CCC employees

Outsourced agencies

Human Resource Support

SUPERVISOR

PRO

PEON & GUARD

Fig 8

Accessible Ramp with handrail

Help Desk at Waiting Lobby Colored and Braille Map Tactile Flooring and Accessible Counter Floor Marking for Queue Management

Counter Signages

ADEQUATE

1 WAITINGAREA

ASSISTANCE PRESENCEOF 2 FLOORMARKING 3 WITHHELP 4 ACCESSIBLE 5 SIGNANGES, & QUEUE WAYFINDING

MANAGEMENT

DESK

EQUIPMEN

Fig 9 217 217

217


Planning PG Level-4 Faculty of Management UM4002-A Monsoon 2021

ent

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Fig 10

Fig 11

218

218

218


UM4002-B

Service Operations Management Studio

Program Urban Management Unit Assistant Mayuri Varkey

Students Pragya Sharma Smriti M Shah Meet Rakeshkumar Kavya Lalchandani Swethachandran R C Akshita Yadav Rohith T Rupali Shrivastava Sahajramani Archita Dinesh Alankrita Nandy

Gayatri Doctor

Manish Vadanere

Service organizations respond to the requirements of users to satisfy some needs and leave certain experiences in the minds of the users through a service delivery system. This studio addressed the design, operational and strategic aspects of managing service systems. Service Operations Management (SOM) focuses on how firms can deliver excellent service while achieving success. Current practice reveals a lack of widespread understanding of effective service management. This course took the position that there is enormous potential to improve services. The studio was designed to equip students with the concepts and tools to do so. Students learned to design distinctive and sustainable service strategies, to manage users and employees, to leverage data to enhance performance, and to reshape their organizations to suit evolving users’ needs and changing competitive landscapes. Students learned different tools and techniques of operations and management in assessing the efficiency of urban services. The learning outcomes were realized by appropriate case studies through different exercises

219 219

219


220

Faculty of Management UM4002-B Monsoon 2021

220

Fig 1

220


Fig 1 Akshita Yadav, Archita Sahajramani Studio Introduction and Timeline Fig 2 Rohith T, Alankrita Nandy CCC Introduction Fig 3 Rupali Shrivastava IEC Plan Fig 4 Swetha Chandran Service Level Agreements

Fig 5 Rohith, Smriti, Kavya Lalchandani BusinessProcess Re engineering Overview Fig 6 Akshita Yadav, Pragya Sharma HRM Timeline Fig 7 Rupali Shrivastava, Meet shah New Service Concept

Fig 2

221 221

221


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4002-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 3

Fig 4

222

222

222


Fig 5 223 223

223


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4002-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 6

Fig 7

224

224

224


UM4004-A

Urban Management Foundation Studio

Program Urban Management Unit Assistants Dhaval Patel

Students Dhruvi Gandhi Happy Hadvani Ira Mathur Mansi Kesharwani Nilisha Mathur Paridhi Khandelwal Pinal Dave Poojitha Reddy Sarthak Tapasvi Utsav Mishra Yash Nivalkar

Nimitt Karia

Kruti Zaveri

The live exercise helped students to critically analyse issues in their premise involving components of both hard facilities management like building services, fabric maintenance, etc, as well as soft facilities management issues such as governance and people management. There were weekly exercises which encouraged students to apply tools and techniques for strengthening skills of observation, visualization, critical thinking,problem-solving and communication. The exercises, which were conducted both individually and in group facilitated students to understand the processes- involving status assessment, identification of gaps leading to development of alternatives and solutions and an implementation plan. The students developed key strategies for managing public and private facilities, identified alternatives and also conducted stakeholder interactions to develop optimal solutions leading to higher end-user satisfaction. The studio included ‘meet the manger’ sessions for cross-sectoral learning from alumni and experts. The Foundation Studio directed the students to prepare a facilities management implementation plan for their respective sites.

225 225

225


226

Faculty of Management UM4004-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

226

226


Fig 1 Sarkhej Group Cover Page Fig 2 Sarkhej Group People, Place and Process Fig 3 Utsav Mishra Sarkhej Roza Governance Structure Fig 4 Sarkhej Group Using BCG Matrix for FM Plan Implementation Fig 5 Sarkhej Group FM Plan for Sarkhej Roza

Fig 7 Bimanagar Group, Cover Page Fig 8 Poojitha Reddy Project Methadology Fig 9 Poojitha Reddy About Biminagar Fig 10 Poojitha Reddy Scenario after leasehold period which directs towards Redevelopment)

Fig 2

Fig 3 227 227

227


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Fig 4 Faculty of Management UM4004-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 5

Fig 6

228

228

228


Fig 7 229 229

229


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4004-A Monsoon 2021

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

230

230

230


UM4004-B

Urban Management Foundation Studio

Program Urban Management Unit Assistants Hirva Popat

Students Ahmad Areeb Chandrima Dutta Majumder Devika J Greeshma S Hetvi Asmani Himani Shekhawat Bhupendra Singh Kartik Banthiya Krishna Kansara Naveeda Naik

Nimitt Karia

Avik Munshi

The live exercise helped students to critically analyse issues in their premise involving components of both hard facilities management like building services, fabric maintenance, etc, as well as soft facilities management issues such as governance and people management. There were weekly exercises which encouraged students to apply tools and techniques for strengthening skills of observation, visualization, critical thinking,problem-solving and communication. The exercises, which were conducted both individually and in group facilitated students to understand the processes- involving status assessment, identification of gaps leading to development of alternatives and solutions and an implementation plan. The students developed key strategies for managing public and private facilities, identified alternatives and also conducted stakeholder interactions to develop optimal solutions leading to higher end-user satisfaction. The studio included ‘meet the manger’ sessions for cross-sectoral learning from alumni and experts. The Foundation Studio directed the students to prepare a facilities management implementation plan for their respective sites.

231 231

231


232

Faculty of Management UM4004-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

232

232


Fig 1 CEPT University Cover Page Fig 2 CEPT Group Area Mapping Fig 3 CEPT Group Stakeholder Mapping Fig 4 CEPT Group Areas of Interest Fig 5 CEPT Group Solutions for Fire saftey Fig 6 New Cloth Market Group Introduction, Location, Neighbourhood context plan

Fig 7 New Cloth Market Group Site Analysis and Typology Fig 8 New Cloth Market Governance Structure Fig 9 New Cloth Market Integrated FM Plan Fig 10 New Cloth Market CAPEX and OPEX of FM Plan

Fig 2

Fig 3 233 233

233


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4004-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 4

Fig 5

234

234

234


Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8 235 235

235


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4004-B Monsoon 2021

Fig 9

Fig 10

236

236

236


UM4004-C

Urban Management Foundation Studio

Program Urban Management Unit Assistants Kratika Narain

Students Anushree Choudhary Ashish Mathur C V Swathy Madhura Kankal Neha Shetty Saumya Mehta Suraj V S Turlapti Priscilla Paul Vanshika Srivastava Venkat Doshi

Nimitt Karia

Radhika Budhbhatti

The live exercise helped students to critically analyse issues in their premise involving components of both hard facilities management like building services, fabric maintenance, etc, as well as soft facilities management issues such as governance and people management. There were weekly exercises which encouraged students to apply tools and techniques for strengthening skills of observation, visualization, critical thinking,problem-solving and communication. The exercises, which were conducted both individually and in group facilitated students to understand the processes- involving status assessment, identification of gaps leading to development of alternatives and solutions and an implementation plan. The students developed key strategies for managing public and private facilities, identified alternatives and also conducted stakeholder interactions to develop optimal solutions leading to higher end-user satisfaction. The studio included ‘meet the manger’ sessions for cross-sectoral learning from alumni and experts. The Foundation Studio directed the students to prepare a facilities management implementation plan for their respective sites.

237 237

237


238

Faculty of Management UM4004-C Monsoon 2021

Fig 1

238

238


Fig 1 House of MG Cover Page Fig 2 House of MG Group Back of House Mind Mapping activities Fig 3 House of MG Group Front of House Mind Mapping activities Fig 4 House of MG group Maslow’s Hierarchy for Needs accesment

Fig 5 House of MG Proposal in line for GRIHA rating Fig 6 LJ group Stakeholder mapping for LJ Fig 7 LJ group Organization chart and communication suggestion for effecient function

Fig 2

Fig 3 239 239

239


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4004-C Monsoon 2021

Fig 4

Fig 5

240

240

240


Fig 6 241 241

241


Planning PG Level-4

Fig 1 Name Name Caption Fig 2 Name Name Caption Fig 3 Name Name Caption

Fig 4 Name Name Caption Fig 5 Name Name Caption Caption Caption Caption

Faculty of Management UM4004-C Monsoon 2021

Fig 7

Fig 8

242

242

242


Tutor Profiles Amal Shah is a graduate of School of Interior Design, CEPT University. He has worked on residential, hospitality, retail, work environments, and healthcare projects. He has been teaching at Faculty of Design, CEPT University as an assistant professor since 2012. He has taught several subjects related to technology, history, research, and studio. He has also guided several research theses. Amit Gotecha is an urban planner with over 10 years of experience in spatial planning projects. The projects range from preparation of development plans/master plans, preparation of town planning schemes, housing projects and urban design and street design projects. He works as Senior Consultant and Operations Manager with CUPP-CRDF and is involved with CEPT University as Visiting Faculty. He holds a master’s in Planning from CEPT University, Ahmedabad. Anil Kumar Roy, is an associate professor at CEPT University with over 20 years of experience. He holds a Doctoral degree in Urban Geography from JNU and a Masters of Planning from CEPT University. He was awarded the Canadian Studies Doctoral Fellowship for his PhD work and got affiliated with Dalhousie University, Halifax in Canada. Anjali Jain is a practicing architect and landscape architect. She is the Principal at Shared Ground, based in Ahmedabad. As part of the practice, she has worked on landscape projects across scales and geographies. Her academic interests include methods of representation, and history and theory that is critical to landscape architecture; she has also taught courses on both in previous years. Anoop Khajuria is an Urban Management Professional with an experience of working on diverse projects in real estate companies. He has handled operations part under the vertical ‘Asset Services’ in CBRE South Asia Pvt ltd. He has a bachelor degree in Civil Engineering and master degree in Urban Management. Aparajita Basu is the Principal Architect and Founder of ‘[trans] architecture’ since 2002. The firm aims to work with a collaborative and multi-disciplinary approach to architectural design. Currently, she is an adjunct faculty member at the Faculty of Design, CEPT. Arjun Joshi is an architect-urban planner with more than 16 years of experience working on urban planning, architecture interior design, landscape, and urban design projects. He has completed M. Plan. in Urban and Regional Planning from CEPT University, and B. Arch. from the M.S.University of Baroda, Vadodara. Currently, he heads a firm ‘URBINTARCH’, which he co-founded. Arpi Maheshwari is an architect and Founder at AlignDL. She holds a master’s of Architecture in Emergent Technologies and Design from AA School of Architecture, London. Her passion for computational methods, generative processes, parametric design and digital fabrication has led her to push boundaries with experiments and explorations with a focus on computational design. Ashna Patel is an architect graduated from CEPT University and holds an M.A. in International Architectural Regeneration & Development from Oxford Brookes, UK. She is co-founder of Fifth Column, a Vadodara-based design practice. She has previously taught studios and Architectural History & Theory courses at NUV and MSU Vadodara. Her primary research interest lies in tourism led urban regeneration.

243 243

243


Avik Munshi is a management consultant and published researcher with experience across engineering, plastics, and real-estate industries. He specializes in management systems and finance for businesses ranging from start-ups to enterprises. His research engagement, academic involvement and consulting practice give him a unique set of knowledge, experience and skills necessary for the multi-faceted perspective required in solving complex management challenges. Brijesh Bhatha is an architect & an urban designer practicing since 1998. He has led an architecture firm Groundwork Architecture since 2010. He has taught design studios at CEPT since 2012 and is currently the program chair for the Master of Urban Design program. He has an undergraduate degree in Architecture from CEPT University and a master’s degree in Urban Design from UC Berkeley. Chandrani Chakrabarti is a landscape architect with over ten years of professional consulting experience in landscape architecture and urban design. Chandrani’s teaching and research interests include landscape ecology, productive landscapes, and landscape urbanism. She has been associated with CEPT University since 2018; currently serves as Program Coordinator, Master of Landscape Architecture. Dhaval Gajjar is an alumnus of the faculty of architecture, CEPT University, Ahmedabad. He has been working in the field of architecture and landscape design for more than 15 years. As part of his practice, he has worked and collaborated with many design practices and consultants from India and overseas. He has been involved in projects of various scales and typologies along with academics. Divya Shah is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Architecture at CEPT. Her teaching involves developing visual and speculative tools to record and interpret indigenous landscapes to infer them as physical and cultural systems. Her current research is in areas of landscape anthropology, with a particular focus on landscape and its reciprocity to cultural narratives of places. Gaurang Shah graduated from the National Institute of Design in 1983, with a specialization in product design. He has over a decade of work experience in the research and development department of some leading industries. He has worked with NID as a member of the faculty of Industrial Design, where he was heading the Product Design department. Gauri Bharat has developed construction history as a personal research area in the past 3 years. Her earlier research on adivasi history initiated this interest where she explored the making and physical transformation of domestic architecture as an archive of the community’s history. She is currently working on a research project funded by the Graham Foundation on the rise and spread of reinforced concrete construction between 1920 and 1950. Gayatri Doctor has over 20 years of experience in the IT industry and academics. She is currently engaged in the field of Urban Management from a technology perspective. She teaches studios and courses in Urban Governance and Management, Service Operations Management, E-governance, and Future Cities and Technology. Her interests include data-driven governance; open data; smart cities; emerging technologies & their applications in the urban realm and future cities Hersh Vardhan Bhasin is an Architect-Planner with over 10 years of experience, ranging from preparing LAP, townships, providing transaction Advisory services for Smart City projects, and various architectural projects in residential, healthcare, and hospitality domains. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Architecture from Rizvi College of Architecture, Mumbai, and a master’s degree in Urban and Regional Planning from CEPT University, Ahmedabad.

244

244

244


Jagrut Patel, believes in designing spaces that engage experiences. A strategic thinker with a passion for innovation, he is always ready with a solution, be it any resource crunch, or an onsite glitch, or the ‘e-Architecting’ design processes. He heads Jagrut & Partners, a team thriving on collaboration, cross-pollination of ideas, solutions and expertise; they are creators of 200+ products that go beyond style. Jayashree Bardhan is an architect and heritage professional with an M.A. in World Heritage Studies from BTU, Germany, UNESCO Chair in Heritage Studies and a B.Arch. from CEPT. She has worked on diverse architectural and cultural heritage projects. She is an ICOMOS and ICORP member and has recently conducted research on ‘Heritage at Risk’ initiatives, mentored by the ICOMOS International Board. Jaymin Panchsara is a graduate in Furniture Design from the National Institute of Design with an exchange semester at the University of Ferrara, Italy. He is Co-Founder and lead designer at Skai, a Design and Manufacturing company. Jignesh Mehta is an adjunct associate professor and area chair for Master of Urban Planning at CEPT. With more than 20 years of international professional experience in the fields of urban planning and urban design in India and the USA, he has worked on award winning projects. He holds a master’s degree in Urban Planning and Policy from the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), USA and a degree in Architecture from CEPT. Kaulav Bhagat is an interior and furniture designer; an alumnus of CEPT and NID. He is currently the Program Chair for the Master of Furniture Design program. He has 14 years of work experience in the field of retail Interiors and furniture design. He loves to experiment with materials and making techniques. He believes in design processes for developing creative ideas. Kevin Low has taught and worked in the monsoon tropics since graduating from the United States with graduate and postgraduate degrees in architecture, and a minor in art history. His work and writing have been published widely, directed through an understanding that the big idea is less about the search for radical solutions, than about the discovery of radical questions relevant to specific context. Khelan Modi is working with Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, CRDF, CEPT University as Project Manager. He has about 9 years of experience in Strategic Transport Planning, and holds a specialization in preparing Strategic Transportation Models, Travel Demand Modelling, Logit models, Urban Public Transport service planning, MRT and BRT feasibility studies, State Highway Master planning etc. Khushi Shah is a conservation architect with specialisation in Heritage Conservation from Centre des Hautes Etudes de Chaillot, Paris. She has over 18 years of experience in the field. She was a key team member for the preparation of the World Heritage Nomination dossier for Ahmedabad. She has also worked on restoration projects as part of the Indo-French Collaboration project on the city of Ahmedabad. Kireet Patel is the founding faculty member and Associate Professor at Faculty of Design, CEPT University. He is an Advisor at Design Innovation and Craft Resource Centre (DICRC), CEPT University. Kruti Javeri is a development Sector consultant and works in various capacities with Saath Charitable, Saath Facilitators & ElderAid Wellness Private Ltd. She is involved in developing innovative activity-based livelihood and STEM interventions for various formal, informal groups focusing equally on life skills components. Designing thematic based custom solutions for individual and corporate donors is her area of expertise. Kruti is an alumnus of the Master of Urban Management program.

245 245

245


Madhu Bharti is Professor at FP, CEPT University. She is a policy-planner with more than 25 years of experience, having spent the first 13 years of her career at the Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO ) engaged in the sector of housing and infrastructure finance. She has carried out extensive work in the field of Land and Housing, urban poverty, slums and poor income areas. Manish Vadanere is an Urban Management Professional working as the Head of Strategic Development and Public Relations of AccionLAND Pvt. Ltd. He has over five years of work experience in India and Kuwait. He is involved with innovative technologies like Drone-based consulting projects for Hydrology & flood inundation mapping, Pandemic & Crisis mapping, etc. Meera Mehta is Executive Director for the Center for Water and Sanitation at CEPT University’s Research and Development Foundation (CRDF). She is Professor Emeritus at CEPT University and has 30 years of experience in water, urban development and infrastructure finance. She worked on USAID’s FIRE Project in India (1994-1999)} and later with the World Bank in India. Mili Amin is an architect & interior designer with over 17 years of professional experience. Having completed her bachelor’s in Architecture at Woodbury University, Los Angeles, USA. She also worked in Los Angeles, USA for seven years to gain experience with renowned Architectural firms. She joined HCPIA in 2007 and has worked on numerous architecture as well as interior projects. Mona Iyer has over 18 years of experience in research, training and consultancy in water, sanitation and waste management sectors with focus on policy initiatives and project development mainly in Asia and the Pacific. She has been recipient of the prestigious British Chevening Fellowship for Environment Management, UK and Netherland Fellowship Programme (for solid waste management) at UNESCO-IHE. Mrudula Mane is an architect from Mumbai & holds M.A. in Conservation of Historic Buildings from the University of York, UK. Presently she is working as a Research Associate at the Center for Heritage Conservation, CDRF. She has been actively involved in documentation, research, conservation projects for Government & Non-Government agencies in Mumbai, Matheran, Pune & Ratnagiri regions in Maharashtra. Narendra Mangwani is an academician, researcher and practicing architect-urban designer with his firm URBSCAPES, Ahmedabad. He has been involved in master planning housing landscape, and community projects. He teaches urban design at CEPT University. He pursued his graduation in Architecture at D.C. Patel School of Architecture, Anand, and a master’s program in Urban Design from CEPT University. Nigar Sheikh is a conservation engineer with bachelor’s in Construction Technology (Hons.), from SBST, CEPT University. She obtained an M.Sc. in Advanced Structural Analysis of Monuments and Historic Construction, from University of Minho, and Czech Technical University. She is currently in-charge at Conservation Laboratory, CEPT University and Research Associate at Center for Heritage Conservation. Nikhil Dhar completed his B. Arch. from SPA, Delhi and his M.L.A. from the Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst. He has been a practicing landscape architect as owner of the firm Artemisia. He is a member of the visiting faculty at the School of Planning & Architecture, Delhi and the Sushant School of Art & Architecture, Gurgaon, and is closely involved with ISOLA’s Education Board. Nimitt Karia is a practicing project management consultant, heading ‘Development 2020’- a multidisciplinary firm. He has done post-graduation in Construction Economics and Mgmt. (UCL, UK), Executive MBA (Middlesex, UK), &Urban Development & Planning (IGNOU, India). He is qualified as a Chartered Member (MRICS) & is currently enrolled in post-graduation at Oxford University in Major Program Management. Apart from the consultancy experience; he has 15 years teaching experience.

246

246

246


Nitika Bhakuni is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Planning, CEPT University. She is a geographer-planner with a Doctoral Degree from CEPT University and Masters in Planning from SPA, New Delhi. She has 18 years of experience, and her expertise lies in database management, land use, transport integration, and equity issues for a wide range of transportation projects undertaken at CRDF, CEPT. Nivesh Chaudhary is an Infrastructure professional with experience of around 13 years across various infrastructure sub-sectors, particularly in ports, logistics, and supply chain. He has worked on various large-scale multidisciplinary domestic and international consulting engagements for promoters and decision-makers in India, Singapore, Indonesia, UAE, Sultanate of Oman,Germany, and Islamic Republic of Iran. Prachi Patel holds a master’s degree in Furniture Design from CEPT University. She has industry experience of over three years working with residential furniture and various scales of Interior Projects. She has been associated with the Master of Furniture Design program at CEPT University as Teaching Associate for the past two years. Priyal Shah is a practicing landscape architect, founder and principal at the firm Landscapes@ Studio 603. She has worked with M/s Prabhakar B. Bhagwat in the past. She is associated academically as a visiting faculty with a few other universities in Ahmedabad. In the landscape department at CEPT, she takes pleasure in teaching landscape lighting electives and many studios design projects Priyanka Kanhare is a practising Architect and Landscape Architect. She is currently a Visiting Faculty at CEPT University (Faculty of Architecture), Ahmedabad and Navrachana University (School of Environment, Design and Architecture), Vadodara. Her teaching interest lies in representation and communication. She is pursuing PhD in Landscape Architecture at SPA, Delhi. Purvi Chhadva is an architect, urban designer and educator with over 20 years of work experience. She has professional experience in designing institutes, housing and various urban and master planning projects. She is a partner at ‘AVN Architecture & Urbanism’ practice at Ahmedabad. Since 2007, she has been teaching UG and PG programs in architecture and urban design at CEPT University. Radhika Amin is an architect with undergraduate studies from CEPT University and master’s from Architectural Association (Emergent Technologies and Design). She has hands-on construction experience through workshops related to physical and digital fabrication. She is currently involved with using generative techniques as a tool for performance-based design, at the scale of both material systems as well as city systems. Radhika Budhbhatti is a Project Management Consultant with over 10 years of experience in handling projects including Residential buildings, Townships, Hotels and Hospitals. With academic backup and research background in Environment and Sustainability and her work in built environment over years, she has been a backbone in development of a start-up related to prefabricated structures, providing built spaces with minimal carbon footprint. Rajendra Mistry is an alumnus of National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad. As a Product Designer he has been practising as a freelance Design Consultant for Consumer & Medical Products, Lighting, Packaging, Exhibition Design, Museum & Experiential Designs for over 25+ years. The studio has an in-house workshop facility for prototyping and for custom exhibit production. The studio designs, builds and commissions its own projects pan India. Ravi Sannabhadti is An Assitant Professor and Faculty Co-ordinator at Faculty of Planning is a social worker and urban planner by training. He has experience working on social equity and community development issues, particularly in the thematic areas of disaster response, rehabilitation & preparedness; integrated water management; affordable housing; urban poverty, and sustainable livelihoods.

247 247

247


Rishav Jain works as an Asst. Professor and Program Chair for M.Des.(Interiors) and IMIAD at the Faculty of Design, and a research expert with Design Innovation Craft Resource Centre (DICRC) at the CEPT University, Ahmedabad. His research and writings explore the idea of craft beyond traditions and craft beyond objects, as they conduct an exploration of the contemporary perspective on Building Crafts in India. Rujul Joshi is an Architect with a master’s in Urban Planning from CEPT University and ten years of professional experience. He is Co-Founder and Director of CoNext Labs LLP which provides solutions to cities and business entities in areas of planning, design, research, and urban tech for making cities better for tomorrow. Rujuta Ranade’s cardinal philosophy of sustainable development through natural resource management and minimal intervention in nature reflects through her academic research as well as professional works. With a professional experience of over eleven years in the private and public realm on a range of projects, she has gained proficiency in master planning and landscape projects from conceptual to execution stage. Rushil Pallavjhala is Co-founder and CEO of Bandhu, an impact-tech start-up that enables lowincome workers to make data-driven migration decisions and thereby enriches their livelihoods. Rushil holds a master’s degree in City Planning from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wherein he focused on Finance and Tech for Urban Development in the Global South. He received a Fulbright Scholarship for the same. Rushil also holds a Bachelors in Architecture and has worked extensively on affordable housing and large urban projects in India and abroad. Rutool Sharma is Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Planning at CEPT University. She has over 18 years of experience in research, teaching and consultancy. She is involved in teaching subjects like planning legislations, urban land management and housing project studios. Her primary areas of interest include interdisciplinary aspects related to policies, governance, equity and environment. Rutul Joshi is an Associate Professor at Faculty of Planning and the Head of Doctoral Office at CEPT University. He chairs the foundation semester for all PG programs in the Faculty of Planning and leads the first semester foundation studio ‘Understanding the City’. Apart from the studio, he teaches urban history at the UG and the PG level and urban theories in the PhD program. Sabrina Khan is an architect with an M.Arch. degree (Urban Design, Urban Conservation) from CEPT University. She currently directs The MM Collective, working in the areas of urban conservation and development and collaborates on urban regeneration projects with the CRCI, India. She has previously taught in the areas of gender Studies, architectural criticism and humanities. Sagar Modh is teaching at the Faculty of Design, CEPT. He has worked in the industry and with the professional sector of the design field. He has collaborated with NID, Elephant Design, Pune and SWATCH NGO, designing interiors and products. He has a bachelor’s degree in Interior Design from APIED and a master’s degree in Industrial Design from MIT ID Pune. Sagar Modh is teaching at the Faculty of Design, CEPT. He has worked in the industry and with the professional sector of the design field. He has collaborated with NID, Elephant Design, Pune and SWATCH NGO, designing interiors and products. He has a bachelor’s degree in Interior Design from APIED VV Nagar and a master’s degree in Industrial Design from MITID Pune. Samir Bhatt has a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Design from NID and has been teaching at NID and CEPT as a visiting faculty since 2008. He has taught at the Faculty of Design for furniture design studios (1992-2007). He owns a design and manufacturing furniture studio. He has worked with Sarabhai electronics research center for 2 years, with Calico textile mills for retail shop furniture, and with HCP for 1.5 years (1975-1982).

248

248

248


Sandeep Mukherjee graduated from the National Institute of Design Ahmedabad in Industrial Design (Furniture). He set up Quetzel Design with the intent of design and manufacture of contemporary furniture. The company set up a state-of-the-art manufacturing unit that used hitech to manufacture high quality furniture that was focused on design for the Indian consumer. Sankalpa has been teaching construction, structure and design studio for the last five years in the Faculty of Architecture, CEPT University undergraduate program. His method of teaching involves modelling techniques that can be experienced and verified. He is one of the founding members of a practise ‘Thumbimpressions Collaborative’ that focuses on addressing careful use of building materials. Shilpa Mevada is a practicing architect and CEPT alumnus. Temporal lifestyles, work patterns and climate are constantly inspiring her approach in shaping architecture and the built environment. Previously, she worked with Ar. Tatiana Bilbao in Mexico, USA and Europe, and with Prof. Neelkanth Chhaya in India. Shivanand Swamy is an economist and urban and regional planner with vast experience in transport systems, integrated land use-transport planning and development management. He has been teaching at CEPT University since 1986 and has served as a policy and systems advisor to national, state and local Governments on public transport and planning initiatives across the country. Shubhra Raje’s practice involves designing buildings and teaching architecture. With graduate and postgraduate degrees in architecture and a minor in theory and criticism from Cornell and CEPT, she founded her architecture and design studio with a commitment to a spatial ecology and an economy of means borne out of critical intimacy with the context within which each project is situated. Siddh Doshi is a doctoral candidate at the Faculty of Planning, CEPT University and is also the Program Executive for the Master of Urban Infrastructure (Major in WASH) program at the Faculty of Planning, CEPT University, supported by IHE, Delft and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). He has more than five years of experience in research, teaching and independent consulting. Siddh Doshi is a doctoral candidate at the Faculty of Planning, CEPT University and is also the Program Executive for the Master of Urban Infrastructure (Major in WASH) program at the Faculty of Planning, CEPT University, supported by IHE, Delft and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). Siddh has more than five years of experience in research, teaching and independent consulting. Sonal Mithal is an architect-artist. She holds a PhD from UIUC, USA; M.Arch. from SPA Delhi; and B.Arch. from Lucknow University. As co-founder of People for Heritage Concern, she provides research-based consultation for urban projects at varying scales. She focuses on feminist, materialist, intersectional inquiries for architecture. She has exhibited her artworks in the USA, Europe, East and South Asia. Sophiya Islam is an architect and urban designer. She holds an undergraduate degree in Architecture from Aligarh Muslim University and a Master of Planning (Urban Design) degree from CEPT University. She has three years of experience working on campus design projects with ARCOP Associates in Delhi. Since her graduation, she has been engaged in teaching at CEPT University. Tarun Patel is an architect-urban planner with over 14 years of experience in planning, urban design, and architecture. Currently, he heads his firm, MISA Architects, focused on Responsible Architecture & Design. He pursued his graduation in Architecture at SVIT Vasad and a master’s program in Urban planning from CEPT University.

249 249

249


Umesh Shurpali is an urban designer with over 20 years of professional experience. Prior to establishing ‘Place Design Studio’, he led the Urban Design division and served as an advisor at India’s first financial service center. He pursued his graduation in Architecture at Shivaji University, Kolhapur, and a master’s in Urban Design from CEPT University Utkarsh Patel is an engineer and urban Planner with more than 22 years of practice experience leading the preparation of master plans, town planning schemes, township plans and strategic framework plans for ports, tourism circuits, and Special Investment Regions. Utkarsh holds a bachelor’s degree in Construction Technology and master’s degree in Urban Planning with a specialization in Housing from CEPT University, Ahmedabad. Vanishree Herlekar is an urban planner and communicator with 12 years of experience working in the urban planning policy and development space. She combines her passion for cities and storytelling to help diverse groups communicate their messages and engage meaningfully with stakeholders. Her teaching and research interests are in urban land planning and regulations, housing affordability, and governance. Vipuja Parmar is an urban designer and a partner at Urban Architectural Collaborative, since 2016. She has over 10 years of experience working on urban design projects in Ahmedabad and Mumbai. She has been teaching as visiting faculty at CEPT and Indubhai Parekh School of Architecture, Rajkot since 2015. She has a master’s degree in Architecture – Urban Design, from CEPT University. Vrushank Vyas is an industrial designer and a mechanical engineer with 8 years of experience helping companies in medical, consumer electronics, machine enclosures, and consumer goods sectors. He holds multiple patents in industrial IoT technology. After finishing M.Des. in Product Design from MIT Institute of Design in 2013, he started a product design studio: Cosire. In 2017, he started a product company, Oizom, which focuses on solving climate change issues. Yati Sengupta is the Principal Landscape Architect at Samir Sengupta & Associates. She is an academician and teaches landscape design and planning at the post-graduate landscape program of CEPT University. She believes in the conscious practice of multi-centric design models and the optimization of requirements of the user, client, and contextual environment.

250

250

250


Editorial Team Tridip Suhrud He is the Provost of CEPT University. He has been the Director of CEPT Archives for the past 2 years. Prior to this, he served as the Director of Sabarmati Ashram for 5 years. As an academic he has worked with DAIICT (Gandhinagar), NID, CSDS (New Delhi), and, St. Xavier’s College, Ahmedabad. He is a scholar of Life and Thought of Mahatma Gandhi and has published many books. He is a member of the Gandhi Heritage Sites Mission of the Government of India. He is also a member of the governing board of MICA since 2015. He holds a doctorate in political science along with master’s degrees in economics and political science.

Chirayu Bhatt He is the Deputy Provost–Academics, CEPT University. He has been leading the academic initiatives across all programs of the university and played a pivotal role in steering academic activities during the COVID-19. As an architect-urban planner, he has been working at the confluence of urban planning, urban design, public policy and more recently, education, for over 15 years. He holds a master’s in urban planning from Georgia Tech and a bachelor’s in architecture from CEPT.

Anjali Kadam Anjali Kadam is an architect and urban conservationist and Head, Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) at CEPT University. TLC was set up to inspire, support and strengthen new directions in pedagogy and learning at CEPT. Her work in historic cities, feeds into her research and academic experience of over 20 years. She holds bachelor’s in architecture from M.I.T.S Gwalior and master’s in architectural conservation from SPA, Delhi and is currently, pursuing her PhD in Architecture from CEPT University.

251 251

251


Copyrights Page © L4 Studio Units Catalog – Monsoon 2021 Teaching and Learning Center, CEPT University Editors: Tridip Suhrud Chirayu Bhatt Anjali Kadam Copy Editor: Neha Krishnakumar Editorial Coordination & Layout: Bhuvaneshwari S. Devna Vyas Ishaq Faheem Khushi Patel Cover Design by: Priyanka Awatramani Cover page Image credit: Jegan M, LA4010 Published by: CEPT University Press Kasturbhai Lalbhai Campus University Road, Navrangpura Ahmedabad-380009 Gujarat India ISBN: 978-93-83184-49-1 Copyright © 2019 CEPT University Press Individual contributions are copyright of respective authors. Images are copyright of respective creators, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. This book or any part thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner, whatsoever without the prior written permission of the publisher.

252

252

252


253

TE ACHI NG AND LE ARNI N G C E N T E R 253

253


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.