Wavelength #27

Page 1

W

Volume 3, Issue 27, May 2008

To r Sea each far ou er r s

avelength The CENTROFIN Newsletter

Human Strategy Traits & Values

a brief note

In this issue

(Viewpoint)

The word derives from the ancient Greek stratēgos, which derives from two words: stratos (army) and ago (leading). Stratēgos referred to a 'military commander' during the age of the Athenian Democracy c5th century BCE. It is undoubtedly one of those words which we use often but understand little.

(Comment)

The table below shows various traits that make up a human. They are the traits of human consciousness; or also called the endowments of human character. They are grouped within the categories of an individual's: (1) attitudes, (2) miscellaneous attributes, (3) social endowments, and (4) skills. Each trait is shown in two ways; how it manifests in a positive way in a person, and how it manifests negatively in a person. If, for example, you decide you want to improve your attitudes or other aspects of your being, you can reference this table to discover which items you might want to improve on.

cont'd on pg 4

According to the traditional concept military strategy means “the art of employing military forces to achieve the ends set by political policy”. This definition was formulated by Liddell Hart (1929) and Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) and is applicable to the whole Art of War - awkward because by tradition the art of war is divided into strategy and tactics; and a strategy is neither tactics nor logistics. In commercial use one can define it as: “the art of applying force so as to make the most effective contribution towards achieving the ends (policy) set by the organisation, by making the best use of the resources available.” Strategy is a long term plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal, most often "winning."

pg 1-3

Leadership pg 4-5

Human Traits & Values pg 6-7

Marine Safety Alert pg 8-9

Safety First !! pg 10-11

MAIB Cases

cont'd on pg 12

pg 12

Leadership among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes.”

(Opinion)

In our previous issue W-26 we opined about 'Leaders & Followers'. Read much on leadership, and you quickly recognize that few authors tell us just what it is that they call leadership. Is this important? If we are to improve our understanding and practice of leadership, we must first agree on what leadership is. In other words, we must define leadership. One description that numerous leadership scholars accept as foundational defines leadership as “an influence relationship

While this characterisation has advanced the field toward an accepted definition, it still does not quite satisfy. Consequently, other experts define leadership as a process dependent on interactive, “influence” relationships between people who intend substantial changes reflecting their mutual purposes. So what does all that mean? First and foremost, leadership is a process not a person, not personality traits, not the behaviours but a process that leaders and followers engage in together.

Strategy

The essence of leadership lies in the process of influencing. Let's say that influence means one person's actions designed to change another person's attitudes, beliefs, values or behaviour. Without influence we can't exercise leadership. The process of influencing can't occur without relationships between people that make that influence possible. The use of the term “interactive” shows these influence relationships as being mutual, reciprocal and multi-directional. In other words, followers influence leaders, leaders influence followers, and peers influence each other.

TO THE MASTER: Please circulate copies of this Bulletin to the CREW.

cont'd on pg 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.