MEDIA PARTNER OF THE YEAR
UNITED NATIONS
2015ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA AWARD LEADERSHIP AWARD 2008
BusinessMirror
www.businessmirror.com.ph
A broader look at today’s business n
Saturday, June 16, 2018 Vol. 13 No. 245
2016 EJAP JOURNALISM AWARDS
BUSINESS NEWS SOURCE OF THE YEAR
P25.00 nationwide | 2 sections 20 pages | 7 DAYS A WEEK
BLOW VS PROFITEERING OR INTRUSION INTO BUSINESS SECRETS?
NONIE REYES
DOE’s push for unbundling fuel product pricing meets resistance from oil players
A
By Lenie Lectura
PROPOSED policy that would mandate oil firms to unbundle, or itemize, the costs of petro fuel—from the pump to the consumers —just doesn’t sit well for oil firms, who argue that such proposal is no longer necessary in a deregulated market. The draft policy enables the unbundling of the base prices of petroleum products, namely, gasoline, automotive and industrial diesel, kerosene, jet fuel, bunker fuel oil and household and automotive liquefied petroleum gas.
This is the first time that the government, through Department of Energy (DOE), will require oil companies to make public the breakdown of the costs that go into the pricing of fuel. Energy Secretary Alfonso G.
Cusi ordered the unbundling of prices of petroleum products recently, and the DOE said the corresponding department circular is now the subject of focus group discussions with the stakeholders. The DOE’s move to finalize the rules implementing, for the first time, a mandate of the oil deregulation law enacted 20 years ago, came just as concern was rising that there might be an element of profiteering in the spike in local oil prices. The spike was blamed initially on the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law that imposed higher fuel excise taxes, but was later explained as a result as well of rising global prices. Thus, the transparency promised by unbundling was seen in some quarters as a timely move by the DOE to precisely eliminate the profiteering angle.
Energy Undersecretary Felix William Fuentebella, in an interview with the BusinessMirror, said the objective of the proposed circular is to mandate industry players to explain to consumers the cost components of petroleum products. “We already know that the components include peso per barrel of landed cost, taxes, biofuels and industry take. But what are the percentages of these components? We just want a breakdown of these components from them so that the public may better understand what they are paying for,” he said. The DOE, in the draft circular, also wants oil companies to provide a weekly notice of the price adjustments—whether decrease, increase or no adjustment— alongside the computation of their products’ components based on the elements involved in the
international price movement, the biofuels cost and the operational cost recovery.
‘Transparency’
CUSI had said the weekly oil pricing updates by oil firms would guide the consumers in making informed decisions in the management of their fuel oil requirements. “Identification of the costing for the major components of these petroleum products that may affect the pump prices would provide a higher level of transparency for our consumers, particularly the motorists,” he said. The same policy will require oil companies and retail outlets to submit baseline data every end of the year for the unbundling of their base price and to comply as well with the mandatory price display board.
Unnecessary, confidential
THE Philippine Institute of Petroleum (PIP), composed of Petron Corp., Pilipinas Shell, Chevron, PTT Philippines and Isla LPG, said the extent of information that the government requires from them, and the manner by which it requires to do so, are “inconsistent with the policy of deregulation.” “The position is that there is no need to unbundle,” said PIP Executive Director Teddy Reyes over the phone. “We felt that since all factors on how prices are arrived at are transparent, since these are published and known to everyone, then it would be ‘nnecessary’ for the unbundling.” The weekly price adjustment, he said, basically covers increments from previous price, and the reason for that includes changes in Continued on A2
Pending bills give hope of more PhilHealth benefits, lower costs
L
By Alladin S. Diega | Correspondent
total health expenditures increased to 34.2 percent in 2016, from 29.7 percent in 2014. “Sadly, despite significant improvements in PhilHealth’s coverage and benefits, the high burden of financing for health still remains on the households” Diosana said.
OW-EARNING Filipinos continue to shoulder the high cost of health care despite improvements in the benefits package covered by the government’s health program, a nongovernment organization said. program of the government, simplified the current excise tax system on alcohol and tobacco products and fixed longstanding structural weaknesses, and addresses public health issues relating to alcohol and tobacco consumption,” a post on the DOF web site said. However, a report from the Philippine National Health Accounts (PNHA) reveals that out-of-pocket spending accounted for 54.2 percent of total spending for health in 2016, compared to 55.7 percent in 2014, while the share of the government to
PESO EXCHANGE RATES n US 53.1220
JAMES FRANCIS | DREAMSTIME.COM
According to Jo-An L. Diosana, senior economist of Action for Economic Reforms (AER), expanding the coverage of the Philippine Health Insurance Corp. (PhilHealth), especially among the poor, was one of the objectives of Republic Act 10351, popularly known as the sin-tax law. The Department of Finance hails RA 10351 as one of the landmark legislations under the administration of President Benigno S. Aquino III. “The sin-tax law helps finance the universal health care [UHC]
Ambitious
DIOSANA describes the government’s UHC tack as “ambitious” and “yet in abeyance”, as several related bills remain pending at the Senate. Those bills “should be able to improve access to quality health care, especially of the underserved citizens,” she explained. However, Diosana said this ambitious goal of UHC could only be reached “if sufficient and sustainable sources of funding are tapped.” The AER and other health advocates believe the funding could come from taxes on so-called sin products—alcohol and tobacco. They are also pushing for the increase in the current sin-tax rates to sustain the financial requirements of the UHC. The pending bills, to note, also eye the funds managed by the Phil-
Health. This government agency is the natural recourse as PhilHealth implements the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP) as mandated by RA 7875. The bills pending at the Upper House of Congress intend to make all Filipinos as PhilHealth members and expand the benefits that the members will enjoy. Specifically, the bills propose the inclusion of outpatient or primary care, such as consultations, medicines and laboratory tests, in the services that will be covered and paid for by the NHIP.
Gains
LOWERING the costs of health care is good news for Filipinos like Marilyn Asidera, a resident of Baranggay Payatas, Quezon City. Asidera said she has to spend P3,000 for medicines when her 10-year-old daughter undergoes medication for mild pneumonia. “Although the medical clinic in Payatas provides free services, we have to spend for the medication and other related costs for a whole week, because my daughter’s case is considered outpatient,” she said Continued on A2
n JAPAN 0.4816 n UK 71.0666 n HK 6.7690 n CHINA 8.2994 n SINGAPORE 39.7828 n AUSTRALIA 40.2452 n EU 62.6468 n SAUDI ARABIA 14.1663
Source: BSP (June 14, 2018 )