Submission in response to the Culture 2025 Discussion Document Introduction: This submission focuses on those areas for which the Blue Drum Agency has an acknowledged competence specifically in the arena of community culture and cultural rights. Thus the concern herein will focus on appropriate policy responses to 2 key questions: -How to improve access to culture in areas of social exclusion or disadvantage? -How Culture 2025 can be used to break down barriers?
Challenge 1: Can a case be made for a responsibility that accompanies National Lottery funding of The Arts Council? Policy Issue 1: The DAHG depends on National Lottery funding for The Arts Council expenditure. It is regrettable that neither the Value for Money and Policy Review of the Arts Council (Sept 2015) nor the Culture 2025 documents make any reference in this regard. Research shows that the budgetary allocation from the National Lottery is substantial Table 1 2013 2014 2015 Arts Council 60,602 56,893 56,893 allocation National Lottery 60,602 56,893 56,893 contribution Source: Revised Government Estimates 2014 and 2015, p. 153 and 228. The National Lottery revenue is gathered disproportionately from lower socio economic groups like unskilled workers, unemployed and people with low education qualifications. From the available data (NESF 2007, pp. 63-64 // Arts Council, 1987, Section 1.3.1). It is almost certain that the substantial public money spent on the arts is regressive meaning it is a transfer of resources from the less well off to the better well off Policy response 1: The current situation creates a precedent for a policy response that provides for a preferential option in relation to activities in the area of social exclusion, disadvantage and cultural diversity. A North South corridor of cooperation would be very welcome in this regard.
Challenge 2: Can the public sector duty established in the Irish Human Rights and Equality Act 2014 be a driver for culture in areas of social exclusion and disadvantage.