POSITION | DIGITAL POLICY | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
European AI Act German industry’s comments on the DRAFT REPORT of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) 13 June 2022 Executive Summary Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the most important key technologies in the industry. Therefore, unbureaucratic and innovation-friendly framework conditions for the use of AI are a key prerequisite for securing the innovative capacity and competitiveness of the European industry in the long term. As stated in our comments on the proposal for harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, presented by the European Commission in 20211, we welcome the risk-based approach of the legislative proposal and the focus on AI systems that can be associated with high risks. However, in our view, there is still considerable need for amendments in many areas of the AI Act, in order to secure the innovative capacity and competitiveness of companies in Europe. Against this background, the BDI welcomes that the IMCO/LIBE draft report includes numerous amendments that aim in a right direction. As outlined in detail in chapter I of this document, the draft report contains, for example, different amendments that improve the legal clarity in particular areas of the AI act, provide for a stronger participation of relevant stakeholders, and facilitate a uniform application ot the regulation within the EU. Nevertheless, we also see the need for significant changes with regard to the IMCO/LIBE draft report, in particular in the following areas: ▪
Definition of ‘AI system’: The draft report basically retains the too-broad definition of AI, proposed by the European Commission. This definition would undoubtedly mean that conventional software and algorithms would also fall within the scope of the regulation. This would impose completely disproportionate burdens on many businesses. To ensure a specific and clearly delimitable scope of the AI Act, German industry urges the co-legislators to adopt a much more precise and narrow definition of AI.
▪
Scope of the category ‘high-risk AI systems’: The scope of the high-risk category should be limited to AI systems that are undoubtedly associated with high risks and not covered by existing European and national product safety regulation. With regard to the amendments included in the IMCO/LIBE draft report, we reject the addition of the sector ‘internet’ to Annex III of the regulation, which is not justified in our view.
▪
Responsibilities along the supply chain: From an industry perspective, there is still the need to further clarify responsibilities along the supply chain and to delineate responsibilities more clearly from each other, e.g. with regard to Article 24 (Obligations of product manufacturers)
1
https://english.bdi.eu/publication/news/proposal-for-a-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence/
Oliver Klein | Digitalisation and Innovation | T: +49 30 2028-1502 | o.klein@bdi.eu | www.bdi.eu