5. Use the results of the study to fix benchmarks and indicators for the follow-up and evaluation of specific activities. II.
EXPECTED RESULTS o
Identification of the legislative framework and reforms (background reforms and procedural reforms) and any changes that may be necessary for the administration of justice in the international crimes justice area;
o
Identification of government policy and that of its international partners (ratification of the Rome Statute, APIC, implementing legislation, effective application of ratified legal documents);
o
Identification of national and international actors involved in the capacity-building, raising awareness and advocacy for the fight against impunity of serious crimes, to provide effective reparation for victims and to promote the Rome Statute System;
o
Identify activities carried out by members of LSK and other legal professionals in Kenya in the area of international criminal law, including advocacy, monitoring and evaluation of domestic proceedings involving international crimes and measure the level of synergy within these networks;
o
Identify the strengths and weakness of past activities and future plans;
o
Evaluation of the knowledge and expertise and the level of engagement of lawyers working in the area of international criminal law, human rights and the fight against impunity.
III.
METHODOLOGY
The baseline study is produced through mapping, surveys and consultations, investigations and consultation meetings with target groups and stockholders from all the countries involved in the activity. To that effect, the following will be carried out: o
A
documentary
review
of
relevant
studies,
reports
and
other
publications as well as national legislation; o
Interviews with key actors in the justice sector and the repression of international crimes (lawyersâ€&#x; associations, national and international experts);
o
A survey on the points of view and priorities of target groups;
22