ARIEL FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL YOUTH CHANGEMAKERS AT THE UNITED NATIONS 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WORLD PROGRAMME OF ACTION FOR YOUTH: THE 80 UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY TH
Editors:
Dr.ArielRositaKing
SirMosesEkwere
Authors:
Dr.ArielRositaKing Amb.NambokaIreneo
SirMosesEkwere
SirAxelBeugre
SirColinRoyal SirPierdomenicoIzzo
SirJeffreyNyarko
LadyHameedaUloomi
This publication is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Margo G. King, whose unwavering commitment to youth empowerment and global development continues to inspire generations. As a United Nations Representative in New York and Geneva, she championed the participation and well-being of young people across the world, ensuring their voices were heard in the halls of diplomacy and action
Beyond her international influence, Dr. Margo was a visionary business leader, a compassionate community advocate, and a devoted family matriarch. Her legacy lives on through her daughter, Dr. Ariel Rosita King, and granddaughters, Ariana-Leilani Margarita Alexandra KingPfeiffer and Victoria Anya King, who continue her mission of advancing humanity through compassion, education, and global citizenship
Her light endures, in every young person given a chance, in every act of kindness, and in every voice raised for a better world.
Editors
Dr. Ariel Rosita King
Sir Moses Ekwere
Book Compiler and Designer
Sir Moses Ekwere
At Ariel Foundation International, our strength lies in collaboration; a global family of changemakers, leaders, and visionaries united by a shared purpose. Across continents and cultures, we work hand in hand to inspire hope, advance humanity, and create sustainable solutions that leave no one behind.
Dr. Ariel Rosita King MPH, MBA, PHD (UK), DTM&H, PHD (France)
Opening statement
Ambassador Namboka Ireneo. Chairperson, Ariel Foundation International
Chairperson’s Note
Sir Moses Ekwere (Nigeria)
AFI Director, Africa Region & Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Geneva
Empowering Humanity Through Youth Action and Global Collaboration
Edinam ubon owo enie se enam ye mme iwad ke edinam ye ofri ererimbot adidiana keed
Sir Axel Beugre (Italy & Ivory Coast)
(Under)Development of Public Healthcare: Who’s Responsible? Assessing the Role of Domestic Political Dynamics in Health Financing Measures in CÔTE D’IVOIRE and South Africa (SOTTO)SVILUPPO DELLA SANITÀ PUBBLICA: CHI È RESPONSABILE? VALUTAZIONE DEL RUOLO DELLE DINAMICHE POLITICHE NAZIONALI NELLE MISURE DI FINANZIAMENTO SANITARIO IN COSTA D'AVORIO E SUDAFRICA
At Ariel Foundation International, our strength lies in collaboration; a global family of changemakers, leaders, and visionaries united by a shared purpose. Across continents and cultures, we work hand in hand to inspire hope, advance humanity, and create sustainable solutions that leave no one behind.
Sir Colin Royal (United State of America)
Lacking Technological Regulation is Leading to a Stunted Generation
Sir Pierdomenico Izzo (Italy)
Youth, Health, and Global Cooperation: Building a Culture of Prevention and Well-Being
Juventud, Salud y Cooperación Global: Construir una Cultura de Prevención y Bienestar
Sir Jeffrey Nyarko (Ghana & USA)
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI): Foundations and Workplace Imperatives
Diversity, Equity ne Inclusion (DEI): Nkabom ne Adesua Wɔ Adwumam
Lady Hameeda Uloomi (Afghanistan)
Between Hope and Hard Reality: Reflections on the 30th Anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth
T E N T S
ACKNOWLEGEMENT
PARTNERS
AUTHOURS
INTRODUCTION
CONCEPT
Purpose and Scope
Rationale
Objectives
Thematic Structure
Field Interventions Informing Diplomatic Inputs (Selected Case Studies)
Expected Outputs and Outcomes
Target Audience
CHAIRPERSON’S NOTE
Ambassador Namboka Ireneo, Chairperson, Ariel Foundation International
GLOBAL HUMANITY & DIPLOMACY FELLOWSIP (GHDF)
A Fellowship Rooted in Purpose
Four Fellowship Tiers for Every Global Citizen From Awareness to Global Action
Join a Global Network of ChangeMakers
GLOBAL AFRICA FORUM - PICTURE GALLERY
T A B L E O F C O
Building Impact Through Action: Africa’s Youth at the Center Voices for Earth: Advocacy Beyond Borders Heath, Humanity, and the Language of Understanding Diplomacy as a Bridge for Youth Empowerment
Vision for 2030: A Global Generation of Responsible Leaders Edinam ubon owo enie se enam ye mme iwad ke edinam ye ofri ererimbot adidiana keed
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, MALARIA ELIMINATION & PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATION OUTREACH
Restoring Hope, Protecting Tomorrow From the Shores of Action to the Waves of Change Health and Humanity in Action
(UNDER)DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE: WHO’S RESPONSIBLE? ASSESSING THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC POLITICAL DYNAMICS IN HEALTH FINANCING MEASURES IN CÔTE D’IVOIRE AND SOUTH AFRICA Introduction
Domestic Political Dynamics and Democratic Institutions in Africa
The Impact of French Colonialism on Public Healthcare in Cote D’Ivoire Apartheid and Racial Tendencies in Health Services in South Africa (SOTTO)SVILUPPO DELLA SANITÀ PUBBLICA: CHI È RESPONSABILE VALUTAZIONE DEL RUOLO DELLE DINAMICHE POLITICHE NAZIONALI NELLE MISURE DI FINANZIAMENTO SANITARIO IN COSTA D'AVORIO E SUDAFRICA
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
ARIEL FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL AT MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY, MALAYSIA
Advancing Student Well-being Through Inclusive Education Beyond Grades, Towards Growth
LACKING TECHNOLOGICAL REGHULATION IS LEADING TO A STUNTED GENERATION
Introduction
Issue Analysis: How is Artificial Intelligence Impacting the Youth?
Potential Death of Creativity: The Threat of Unregulated Generative AI Usage
Conclusion: How Do We Protect Youth Development without Completely Preventing the Understanding of these Generative AIs?
References
YOUTH, HEALTH, AND GLOBAL COOPERATION: BUILDING A CULTURE OF PREVENTION AND WELL-BEING
Juventud, Salud y Cooperación Global: Construir una Cultura de Prevención y Bienestar
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION (DIE): FOUNDATIONS AND WORKPLACE IMPERATIIVES
Practical Benefits of Inclusion
Linking DEI to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Practical Implications for Youth Changemakers
Conclusion
Reference
Diversity, Equity ne Inclusion (DEI): Nkabom ne Adesua Wɔ Adwumam
REFLECTIONS FROM FELLOWS: A VOICE FROM AFGHANISTAN
Between Hope and Hard Reality: Reflections on the 30 Anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth
Ariel Foundation International is in Special Consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations
The year 2025 stands as a defining moment for multilateral cooperation, global development, and youth engagement. It marks the 80th Anniversary of the United Nations, the 30th Anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth (WPAY), and the Tenth milestone of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), three converging moments that collectively reaffirm the world’s commitment to peace, human dignity, and sustainable progress.
Within this transformative context, Ariel Foundation International, under the visionary leadership of Dr. Ariel Rosita King, Founder and President, took part in a series of high-level events and dialogues during the High-Level Week of the 80th Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA 80).
Ariel Foundation InternationaI’s full diplomatic representation was present at:
The Goals Lounge #BeHope (22–26 September 2025), convened by the United Nations Deputy Secretary-General and hosted by the UN Office for Partnerships.
The High-Level Meeting on the 30th Anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth, held on 25 September 2025 at the UN Headquarters in New York.
The Global Africa Forum (GAF) 2025, organised by the Africa Prosperity Network in partnership with AfCFTA Secretariat, The Africa-America Institute, and Rebranding Africa Forum.
Lagos Leads the Future: Subnational Climate Action for the Global South, hosted by the Lagos State Office on Sustainable Development Goals at The Times Centre, New York
Commemorative Sessions for the 80th Anniversary of the United Nations, under the global theme “Better Together: 80 Years and More for Peace, Development, and Human Rights.”
Through these platforms, Ariel Foundation International amplified its global mission, to empower youth, advance humanity through diplomacy, and promote sustainable development through education, leadership, and service. The Foundation’s active participation reaffirmed the essential role of civil society organisations in driving the United Nations’ reform agenda, supporting the Pact for the Future, and accelerating collective progress towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
The Foundation’s diplomatic engagements at the UN were grounded in tangible, fieldtested community impact. Projects such as the Jamestown Seaside Cleanup in Ghana, the Voices of the Earth Youth Advocacy for Climate Action, and the Malaria Elimination Campaign in Nigeria, which reached more than 1,000 families with treated mosquito nets, preventive remedies, and indigenous-language health education, served as living case studies of grassroots innovation informing global policy dialogue.
Each of these initiatives exemplifies Ariel Foundation International’s integrated model of humanity, diplomacy, and sustainability, combining local wisdom with international advocacy to achieve real outcomes. They reflect the Foundation’s conviction that youthdriven, community-centred solutions are central to achieving lasting peace, social justice, and environmental resilience.
This publication therefore seeks to document and disseminate the outcomes, insights, and reflections emerging from Ariel Foundation International’s diplomatic participation at these milestone events. It highlights the contributions and impact of the Global Humanity and Diplomacy Fellowship (GHDF); Ariel Foundation International’s flagship programme that builds capacity for ethical leadership, civic engagement, and global citizenship, and showcases the voices and actions of young leaders shaping solutions from the local to the global stage.
As the international community enters the final five-year stretch towards achieving the SDGs, Ariel Foundation International remains steadfast in its role as a bridge between communities and global governance, ensuring that humanity, in all its diversity and compassion, remains at the centre of diplomacy and development.
Accelerating Global Progress Through Intergenerational Collaboration : Addressing Emerging Global Challenges, Advancing Sustainable Solutions, and Showcasing Over Two Decades of Ariel Foundation International’s Global Diplomatic and Humanitarian Impact
NewYork, September 22 to 26, 2025
This publication documents the full diplomatic participation of Ariel Foundation International at a series of high-level events convened during the High-Level Week of the 80th Session of the United Nations GeneralAssembly (UNGA80). It provides a consolidated account of Ariel Foundation International’s contributions to international policy dialogue, presents field evidence from community interventions, and sets out practical recommendations to advance youth inclusion, humanitarian action, and sustainable development. The publication focuses on Ariel Foundation International’s representation and activity at the following events:
Goals Lounge #BeHope (22 September 2025) — UN Office for Partnerships.
30th Anniversary High-Level Meeting of the World Programme of Action for Youth (WPAY) (25 September 2025) — United Nations GeneralAssembly
Global Africa Forum (GAF) 2025 (on the sidelines of UNGA 80) — Africa Prosperity Network and partners
Lagos Leads the Future: Subnational ClimateAction for the Global South (26 September 2025) — Lagos State Office on SDGs
Commemorative activities for the United Nations 80thAnniversary
The publication also documents Ariel Foundation International’s field initiatives that informed its diplomatic engagements, including the Jamestown Seaside Cleanup (Ghana), Voices of the Earth: Youth Advocacy for Climate Action, and the Malaria Elimination Campaign (Nigeria), which directly reached over 1,000 families with treated nets, preventive interventions, and indigenous-language health education.
II. Rationale
2025 presents multiple milestone moments in multilateral cooperation: the UN’s 80th anniversary, the SDG tenth-year review, and the 30th anniversary of the WPAY. These milestones underscore the need to accelerate implementation of the 2030 Agenda through partnerships that integrate youth leadership, local solutions, and diplomatic engagement.
Ariel Foundation International’s presence at these forums, with full diplomatic representation led by the President and Founder, Dr. Ariel Rosita King, demonstrates how civil society organisations with diplomatic capacity can translate community experience into policy inputs that support measurable SDG outcomes.
III. Objectives
This publication aims to:
1. Record Ariel Foundation International’s diplomatic and programmatic contributions at UNGA80 and associated high-level events.
2. Demonstrate the practical linkages between Ariel Foundation International’s grassroots projects and international policy dialogue.
3. Provide evidence-based recommendations for policy makers, multilateral partners and local actors on scaling youth-led and community-centred solutions.
4. Highlight the role and outputs of the Global Humanity and Diplomacy Fellowship (GHDF) in building diplomatic and leadership competencies among youth delegates.
5. Strengthen Ariel Foundation International’s institutional visibility and partnership opportunities across UN agencies, regional bodies and donor communities.
The publication is organised around three interlocking themes:
Humanity: health interventions, social protection, and inclusive outreach.
Diplomacy: youth representation, multistakeholder dialogue, and diplomatic advocacy
Sustainability: environmental stewardship, climate adaptation, and resilient urban practice.
Each theme links programmatic case studies to recommendations aligned with specific SDGs (notably SDGs 3, 4, 8, 11, 13, 16, and 17).
V. Field Interventions Informing Diplomatic Inputs (Selected Case Studies)
Jamestown Seaside Cleanup (Ghana): a youth-led coastal remediation and community education initiative that combined waste removal, public outreach and local stakeholder engagement. The project served as a demonstrable model for community-led marine protection and civic mobilisation.
Voices of the Earth, Youth Advocacy for Climate Action (International Summit): a multi-country campaign that produced youth position papers, community dialogues, and advocacy events focused on climate adaptation and local resilience strategies. Outputs informed Ariel Foundation International submissions at UNEP and regional climate sessions.
Malaria Elimination Campaign (Nigeria): targeted outreach reaching over 1,000 families with distribution of treated mosquito nets, malaria-preventive protocols, and health education delivered in indigenous languages. The campaign integrated local health knowledge with preventive practice, generating measurable uptake and community feedback.
Outputs:
A multi-chapter publication documenting Ariel Foundation International’s diplomatic engagements, program case studies, policy briefs and fellowship outcomes.
A set of policy recommendations for Member States, UN entities and local authorities.
Apublic summary of GHDF activities and fellowship impact metrics.
Outcomes:
Improved policy visibility for Ariel Foundation International models of youthled, community-centred interventions.
Strengthened partnerships with UN agencies, development partners, and regional institutions.
Increased recruitment and support for the Global Humanity & Diplomacy Fellowship (GHDF)
Identification of pilot projects suitable for scaled financing and partnership.
Primary: Multilateral Organistaions, Member State delegations, regional organisations, development partners, philanthropic donors.
Secondary: City governments, youth and community organisations, academic institutions, private sector investors, and the Ariel Foundation International fellowship network.
As we release this publication, “Ariel Foundation International Youth ChangeMakers at the United Nations 30th Anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth: the 80th UN General Assembly,” I am both humbled and inspired by how far our journey has carried us, and how much remains to be done
DR. ARIEL ROSITA KING, MPH, MBA, PHD (UK), DTM&H, PHD (FRANCE)
Founder and President Ariel
Foundation International & Dr. King Solutions
If I am not for myself, who will be for me?
If I am only for myself, what am I?
If not now, then when?
Hillel
If not me, then who?
Dr. Ariel Rosita King
Since its founding in 2002, Ariel Foundation International has remained committed to a simple yet profound purpose: to inspire children and youth for leadership through entrepreneurship, service, and diplomacy Over the years, we have grown not merely in scale but in depth, engaging communities across continents, building Changemakers, and contributing to global conversations on sustainable development.
Ariel Foundation International’s mission is grounded in partnership, peace, and prosperity Through our Changemakers, programs, and global network, we endeavor to direct resources, skills, and voice directly to communities, especially to youth who represent both promise and potential
In 2025, the convergence of multiple global milestones has presented a unique moment for reinforcement and reflection. The United Nations turns 80. The SDGs reach their ten-year mark The World Programme of Action for Youth (WPAY) celebrates its 30th anniversary These are not symbolic occasions alone; they demand renewed commitment, strategic alignment, and bold action.
It is in that spirit that Ariel Foundation International fielded full diplomatic representation at a suite of pivotal events during UNGA 80, from the Goals Lounge #BeHope to the WPAY high-level meeting, the Global Africa Forum, the Lagos climate dialogue, and anniversary commemoration sessions Our delegates brought to those halls the credibility of lived experience, the weight of grassroot interventions, and the clarity of youth perspectives
The field work underpinning our diplomatic voice is illustrated in initiatives such as the Jamestown Seaside Cleanup in Ghana, the Voices of the Earth Youth Advocacy campaign to end plastic pollution, and our Malaria Elimination Campaign in Nigeria The latter reached over 1,000 families with treated mosquito nets, preventive care, and health education delivered in indigenous language contexts, reinforcing not only health outcomes but respect for cultures and communities.
These actions are not side notes to our diplomacy; they are the foundation of it Wherever Ariel Foundation International speaks in conference rooms or negotiation panels, we do so bearing the evidence, lived stories, and accountability that roots advocacy in reality
Through this publication, we aim not simply to record presence but to mobilize insight, to connect policy to practice, to elevate youth voices, to propose solutions that travel across generational lines, and to champion diplomacy grounded in humanity In doing this, we reaffirm our commitment to SDGs, to peaceful inclusion, and to the power of every young person to lead
I extend my gratitude to our team, our global partners, our fellows, and all who continue to believe that leadership is service, and that dignified development is possible when humanity leads diplomacy
May this work fuel renewed resolve, deepen partnerships, and inspire actions that uphold the promise of a better world for future generations
Dr Ariel Rosita King MPH, MBA, PHD (UK), DTM&H, PHD (FRANCE)
Founder & President, Ariel Foundation International & Dr. King Solutions
For over two decades, Ariel Foundation International has championed the voice and vision of young people worldwide, cultivating leadership rooted in service, purpose, and compassion As the world celebrates 30 years of the World Programme of Action for Youth, Ariel Foundation International reaffirms its commitment to building pathways for youth participation, intergenerational collaboration, and sustainable peace
We don’t just empower youth; we entrust them to lead the future they deserve
In alignment with the United Nations’ global youth agenda, Ariel Foundation International continues to turn advocacy into action Through education, entrepreneurship, climate action, and health initiatives, Ariel Foundation International is shaping a new generation of changemakers. From community impact in Africa to diplomatic representation at the UN Headquarters, our mission remains clear;
to ensure that every young person is seen, heard, and equipped to transform the world.
AMBASSADORNAMBOKAIRENEO
CHAIRPERSON,ARIELFOUNDATIONINTERNATIONAL
As we reflect on more than two decades of empowering youth, advancing social innovation, and promoting international cooperation, the Ariel Foundation International continues to uphold its founding principle, that every individual, regardless of background or geography, has the power to make a difference.
The world today calls for a new generation of global citizens, those who understand that leadership is not about authority, but about service; not about titles but about transforming lives. Through our Global Humanity and Diplomacy Fellowship (GHDF), we are cultivating this generation. We are empowering ChangeMakers, Humanitarians, and Diplomats who lead with empathy, integrity, and courage.
Our mission, anchored in the spirit of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), is to build bridges of understanding between nations and nurture leadership that places humanity at the center of diplomacy From local communities to international platforms, our fellows are rewriting the story of global engagement, one act of compassion at a time.
To our partners, supporters, and fellows, thank you for believing in the power of collaboration and the importance of dialogue. Together, we continue to shape a world where human dignity, peace, and justice remain our shared responsibility.
Let this publication remind us that when we lead with heart and act with purpose, we illuminate the path toward a more humane and united world.
AmbassadorNambokaIreneo. Chairperson,ArielFoundationInternational
ANINITIATIVEOFARIELFOUNDATIONINTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITHDR.KINGSOLUTIONS
In a rapidly transforming world, where global cooperation and humanitarian leadership are more critical than ever, the Global Humanity & Diplomacy Fellowship (GHDF) stands as a beacon of hope and action. An initiative of Ariel Foundation International, in association with DR KING SOLUTIONS. The fellowship bridges humanity and diplomacy by cultivating a network of compassionate global citizens dedicated to sustainable development, peace, and international cooperation.
The GHDF is more than a program, it is a global movement. Designed for emerging and established leaders, the fellowship nurtures the next generation of ChangeMakers, Humanitarians, and Diplomats who aspire to create meaningful impact locally and globally.
Each fellow receives world-class mentorship, professional training, and access to international platforms, building the confidence, cultural intelligence, and leadership capacity needed to influence policy, foster inclusion, and inspire change.
The Global Humanity and Diplomacy Fellowship is designed to nurture leaders at every stage of their global journey, from emerging voices to seasoned Changemakers. Each tier represents a step forward in knowledge, influence, and action for humanity.
1. Diplomatic Explorer:
This is the entry point for those beginning their journey into diplomacy, advocacy, and humanitarian engagement. As a Diplomatic Explorer, fellows are introduced
to the principles of global cooperation and human rights, gaining insights into how the Multilateral organisations and civil society work together to shape a better world.
2. Diplomatic Associate
At this level, participants move from awareness to active contribution. Diplomatic Associates develop professional and communication skills through structured learning and community service, gaining recognition for their role in advancing social good. This tier signifies growth, a bridge between local leadership and international participation.
3. Diplomatic Champion
Champions embody influence and advocacy. They are emerging thought leaders whose ideas and actions begin to shape dialogue on global issues. This level connects fellows directly to international platforms, offering opportunities to publish, engage in Multilateral Organisation events, and represent their work as part of the broader global movement for humanity and diplomacy.
4. Diplomatic Master
The highest tier, reserved for those ready to lead on the global stage Diplomatic Masters receive direct mentorship from international leaders, engage with diplomatic missions, and participate in exclusive high-level experiences. This tier signifies mastery, where passion, purpose, and leadership converge to inspire global transformation.
The Global Humanity and Diplomacy Fellowship is more than a program; it is a pathway to purpose. Whether you begin as an Explorer or rise as a Master, every step reflects a deeper commitment to unity, dialogue, and positive change. Together, we cultivate a generation of leaders who don’t just imagine a better world, they build it.
Through the GHDF, participants not only expand their professional horizons but also rediscover their human capacity for empathy, dialogue, and service. Fellows learn to navigate global systems with resilience, harness the power of collaboration, and drive initiatives that advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Each fellow also receives a copy of HUMANITY UNVEILED — Dr Ariel Rosita King’s collection of unexpected encounters that reveals the human spirit in us all.
Join a Global Network of ChangeMakers
The GLOBAL HUMANITY & DIPLOMACY FELLOWSHIP (GHDF) connects individuals who believe in the transformative power of humanity and diplomacy Together, they engage in international dialogues, community projects, and cross-cultural collaborations that contribute to peacebuilding and social progress.
This is your opportunity to elevate your voice, expand your global footprint, and become part of a movement shaping the future of international humanitarian leadership.
Become a Fellow Today, Visit; www.globalhumanitydiplomacyfellowship.com
Together, we can build bridges of understanding and corridors of peace across the world.
Ariel Foundation International is in Special Consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations
When we invest in youth, we invest in the continuity of hope. Their creativity is our collective resource; their courage, our shared future.
Director,AfricaRegion&PermanentRepresentative totheUnitedNations,Geneva
At Ariel Foundation International, I have always believed that the true measure of progress is not only in what we build, but in how many lives we uplift. Our mission to empower youth, strengthen communities, and promote humanity through sustainable action continues to define my journey in leadership and service.
For me, *youth development* is not a slogan; it is a responsibility It is the foundation upon which the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development can truly stand. When we invest in young people, we invest in humanity’s future. Every initiative, every dialogue, and every collaboration must therefore be rooted in inclusion, dignity, and opportunity
Building Impact ThroughAction:Africa’sYouth at the Center
Under my leadership as Country Director for the Africa Region, Ariel Foundation International has worked tirelessly to create meaningful impact across communities through youth-driven projects that reflect both compassion and purpose.
One of our most symbolic initiatives was the Jamestown Seaside Cleanup-Ghana, held during the 2024 Global Youth Service Day This effort brought together over 100 young volunteers, including international students and members of the local Jamestown community, in partnership with Ecozoil Waste Management Company. Together, we removed nearly two tons of plastic waste from the coastline, while engaging residents in waste audits and community environmental education.
This initiative was not only about cleaning a shoreline, it was about restoring responsibility and ownership among young people. It represented an important contribution toward achieving SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 14 (Life Below Water), and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals).
Through this, we demonstrated that young people are not just the leaders of tomorrow, they are the guardians of today’s planet.
Our Voices for Earth: Youth-Led Advocacy to End Plastic Pollution initiative, organized in partnership with the Rotary Club of Stone Mountain as part of the 2025 World Environment Day campaign, continues this spirit of action.
We convened young leaders and advocates across Africa, Europe, Asia, North & South America and beyond to engage in dialogue, innovation, and advocacy focused on reducing plastic pollution and promoting a circular economy. This summit also aligned with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) theme #BeatPlasticPollution, while contributing to the ongoing intergovernmental discussions for a Global Plastics Treaty.
I have always maintained that environmental diplomacy must begin with inclusion. If young people are the ones who will inherit the earth, then their voices must shape how we protect it.
Another initiative dear to my heart is theAriel Foundation International Malaria Elimination Campaign and Public Health Education. Through this project, we supported over 1,000 families with treated mosquito nets and preventive health education delivered in indigenous languages.
This campaign was about more than disease prevention; it was about respect. When we communicate health in a language people understand, we save lives with dignity and restore trust in public health systems.
This initiative strengthened community resilience, reinforced cultural pride, and fostered collective responsibility, directly advancing SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).
As the Permanent Representative of Ariel Foundation International to the United Nations in Geneva, my commitment is to ensure that youth voices are heard and represented where it matters most, within the spaces of international policy and global diplomacy
Ariel Foundation International, with its Special Consultative Status with the UN ECOSOC, continues to stand as a bridge between grassroots action and global decision-making. Through this role, I have seen the power of collaboration: how communities, governments, and young innovators can together shape policies that transform lives.
By the year 2030, I envision a world where youth are not waiting to be invited to the table, they are building the table themselves. A world where education, environment, and empathy intersect to define leadership A world where every young person, regardless of geography or background, has the tools, confidence, and voice to contribute to global solutions.
This is the vision that drives my work, and the legacy I hope to see continue through the next generation of Ariel Foundation International leaders
Edinam ubon owo enie se enam ye mme iwad ke edinam ye ofri ererimbot adidiana keed
"Ima inọ mme iwad nkpọ senam, iminọ nsọno nda ke ndukene idoreyin. Mme nkpọọmọ enama ke ubọk odo ibọrọ utom ommọ, odudu ọmmọ, odo nnyiniwana eyoiso".
Sir Moses Ekwere
Ekamba owo uwam Dr. Ariel Rosita King, Ekamba ada iwuod, Africa Region ye Permanent Representative ono United Nations, Geneva.
Ke Ariel Foundation International, ami mme sinim ke akpan ikọ nte ke akpainikọ udomo edinam idohoke nkpọ anyin inama kpọd, odo ado uwak uwem owo anyin iyañake Utom nnyinke adiwam mi iwad, onọ mme mbọhọ iduñ nnyin nsọñọ nda, ọnyuñ adipe ndaha ubon owo ke mme edinam ye nsọñọ nda ataña abaña isañ mike ndaha adi dad usuñ ye edinam.
Ke ami, "adidipe ndaha iwad" idoho ufiod; ado utom mi Odo itid idak isoñ ke 2030 ayenda ke mkpọ se ibinọ nnyin nsọñọda abihida ke akpan iko Nnyin ima isin uwam ino me iwad, nnyin imisin uwam inọ otú owo ke eyoiso Afid mme ekikere, afid ubononkpọ ye afid adidiana keed ana asaña akekem, uko, yeukem.
Ubọb Edinam: Mme iwad Africa Ke Ufọd
Ke idak ukara mi nte ekamba akama ukara ke ikpehe Africa, Ariel Foundation International anam utom ikpaha mba anam mme nkpọ ke mme mbọhọ iduñ ke mme ubono ñkpo iwad ayarake ima ye edinam.
Akpan ñkpọ nnyin keed ikinama ke mben iyang Jamestown Ghana, ekenama ini 2024 Global Youth Service Day Edinam ami ama aben edidiana keed adi ke otu mme iwad eke wuọhọ mkpọ nte ikie (100) ediwam, ye mme iwad ekaha ufọk nwed ke esen idid ye mme mbon ebaha ke Jamestown mbọhọiduñ, ediana keed ye Ecozoil Waste Management Company, ke edidiana keed nnyin isio mkpọ akpete adiwuo ekpad mbio ọkpọ iba ke itie uduọñọ mbio, kini eboho yak mbon edʌño ke nkan nkʌk esad mbio
Edinam ami ikodoho adinam kpọd yak nkan nkuk asana akedo adinam yak mme iwad enie se nam ye mfara ke idem. Ekewud akpan mkpo ye adiwana ke yuñ mbọ SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 14(Life Below Water), SDG 17(Partnerships for the Goals) ke emi, nnyin iwuọd ke edinam ke mme iwad idoho mme adida usuñ nkpọñ kpọd ọmọ mme adikpeme obio mfịn
Mme Uyo Keisoñ:
Uyio nnyin ke isọn: mme iwad eda iwuod ke aditre uduọhọ okpọ, edidiana ye Rotary Club of Stone Mountain nte ikpehe isua 2025 World Environmental Day Campaign, akane spirit edinam
Ibeñe meda iwuọd iwad ye mme atang ikọ nọ Africa, Europe, Asia, North and South America ye mbon eken ineidem ke mkpọ ami, ekikere ufa mkpo, ye aditañ ikọ nwuọ nda ke edisuhọ uduọhọ ọkpọ yun ndipe uforo idid nnyin Edinam ami nko asaña ye United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) adoho #BeatPlasticPollution. Kini ekeneke enọ ntibnsin ke mbono ikọ mme government ke mkpọ uduọnọọkpọ.
Ami mesọñọ nte utañ okpọ ke nkan nkʌk ana atọnọ ye eti ekikere. Akporo mmi iwad edo mbon ebihi nie isọñ ana uyio amọ arieke mkpọ anim naña nnyin iyem
Nsọñ idem, Ubon Owo, ye ikọ owo ọdiọñọke abaña:
Ekikere mfen ọdʌkọ mien esit odo Ariel Foundation International Malaria Elimination Campaign ye Public Health Education. Ke toho edinam ami, ima inọ uwam ke mme ufok ọbọñ, ñko ema ekpeeb ukpeme nsọnidem ye ọbọñ adita owo ke usem iduñ nnyin Mme edinam ami amakan ukpeme udọñọ: ake baña ukpono Imatañ ikọ ibaña nsọñ idem ke usem amewo ediọñọ ke, imaiyaña uwem ke uko ye ke akpaniko ke nsọñ idem otu owo.
Akikere ami asin nsọñ ke mbọhọ iduñ, nsọnọ nda ke edinam nnyin, ye ntop nsinke usuñ asañake adọk SDG3 (Good Health ye Well-Being) ye SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities)
Usuñ enama yak iwad enie senam
Nte nsọñọ nda mkpọ adaha ọnọ Ariel Foundation International ke United Nations ke Geneva, ñwa idem mmi odo adinam ekpo uyo iwad enyuñ eda enọọmmọ ke itie ofọnọ akan, ke mufañ ke esen idid ye ke ofri ererimbot
Ariel Foundation International, ye akpan itak ye mme UN ECOSOC, ekene eda nte nsọñọ ke mme edinam ye ñkọk iwuod afid ererimbot. Ke ntak emi, mekid odudu ke edidiana keed: Naña mme iduñ, mbon ukara ye mme iwad ekana nkpọ enam ekeme adimana keed
At Ariel Foundation International, we do not wait for change to happen. We create it, through service, through action, and through humanity.
Ariel Foundation Int’l Director, Africa Region & Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Geneva
Ariel Foundation International Malaria Elimination & Public Health Education Outreach
Through the Ariel Foundation International Malaria Elimination Campaign, over 1,000 families received treated mosquito nets and preventive education delivered in indigenous languages
Beyond protection, this initiative strengthened community health, cultural pride, and collective responsibility.
When we speak health in our own language, we save lives with understanding.
Global
Humanity & Diplomacy Fellow (GHDF)
(UNDER)DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE: WHO’S RESPONSIBLE? ASSESSING THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC POLITICAL DYNAMICS IN HEALTH FINANCING MEASURES IN CÔTE D’IVOIRE AND SOUTH AFRICA
Introduction
This essay concurs with the idea that domestic political decisions and dynamics constitute the most critical factors in explaining and influencing the successes and limits of health financing1 measures to improve the public healthcare infrastructure in both Côte D’Ivoire and South Africa. Indeed, their fallacious structure, influenced by historical events that intrinsically modified decision-making in these two countries, leads us to believe that domestic political institutions are deeply linked to the successes and limits of economic development policy.
Domestic political dynamics have been at the centre of policy-making from colonialism through Apartheid to the Ivorian and South African governments gaining political agency.
Their changes have affected, and still affect, health financing intended to improve public healthcare. Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa are chosen as case studies in this essay as their historical and political experiences demonstrate the fundamental impact that national political factors have on the successes and limits of policy design.
Successes of economic development policies, such as health financing, are defined in this paper as the gradual expansion of public hospitals nationwide, responsible use of tax revenues, elimination of governmental-imposed racial segregation in the public sector, and an increase in the number of health professionals. Limitations include those imposed by prior political exploitative systems, colonial control in the case of Côte D’Ivoire, and systemic racism in South Africa, as well as the widening economic divide between Ivorian communities in the North and the South.
This essay will first critically assess domestic political dynamics related to the emergence of democratic institutions in Africa that strongly influences the success or failure of implementation of economic development policies. It will then analyse the role played by colonialism in Côte d'Ivoire and Apartheid in South Africa in forming domestic political dynamics that foster or hinder the development of public policies like health financing. Finally, it will highlight the significant achievements and limitations of health financing in both Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa from the end of the 20th century until the 2010s, highlighting the role of domestic political choices and dynamics.
A thorough analysis of the successes and limits of health financing in both Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa necessitates the critical evaluation of the role of politics and political forms of government and their influence on economic development policies in the African continent. It has been widely suggested by western scholarship in political science that democratic leaning forms of governments lead to a more stable, economically flourishing and more equitable society, where populations can access and benefit from rights as well as duties (Green, 1985). This idea perfectly complements the notion that the failure of economic development policies to ameliorate a country's socio-political and economic conditions could not be the result of domestic political choices and dynamics. However, this ideological concept does not apply to reality. In fact, in everyday life, national democratic governments, which are intrinsically based on being wealthier, fairer, more innovative and better at respecting rights than available alternatives (Gilley, 2009), are not always effective in managing the social and political consequences of implemented public policies, often worsening the latter.
This is what Adejumobi affirms in his book called ''National Democratic Reforms in Africa: Changes and Challenges''. The author argues that global democratic performance has been subjected to numerous critics as democratic power has been demonstrated to be built on the foundations of a false idea of equality that does not benefit everyone in society (Adejumobi, 2015).
Democracy and democratic power fail to fulfil their purposes of creating a fairer and more equitable political system for all regarding the practical administration of democratic institutions and participatory mechanisms. Despite the positive intentions of democracy, the weakness of democratic institutions and political structure does not allow countries, especially democratic countries in the African continent, to successfully implement public policies aimed at the state's economic growth (Adejumobi, 2020).
Nonetheless, the intrinsic failing nature of democratic power in many African countries dates back to historical events that severely impacted the agency and the political structure of the Ivorian and South African states. When it comes to the economic development policy in question, health financing, fiscal colonial legacies shaping the state's decision-making in the 20th century, mismanagement of public funds by the state in the 21st in Côte D'Ivoire, as well as racial segregation in South Africa are the main political dynamics that fundamentally made domestic political choices the most crucial determinant in explaining the successes and limits of economic development policies.
A solid historical understanding of the impact of colonialism on Côte D'Ivoire's government's agency to control its territory and, consequently, its public policies, is essential to properly contextualise health financing measures that address long-term health needs (Gaber; Patel, 2013). Colonial fiscal systems are essential tools utilised by imperialist powers in Africa, which profoundly influenced the establishment of governmental institutions, making it impossible for domestic political dynamics not to be the primary element to look at when assessing the consequences of economic development policies (Gardner, 2012).
French colonialism severely contributed to shaping Ivorian domestic political structures in addressing public policies towards the development of the public healthcare system. The evolution of health financing measures was intrinsically linked to French political, economic and social objectives. Before the 1900s, health services in Côte D'Ivoire were aimed at supporting French regional expansion goals. This is evident because the healthcare sector was financed only to help soldiers, French administrators, explorers, or missionaries (Gaber; Patel, 2013). This highlights how colonialism profoundly shaped domestic political dynamics in Côte D'Ivoire, which necessarily became the centre of regional policy responses.
In the first four to five decades of the 20th-century, health financing started to resemble direct foreign investments from the metropolis, Paris, to the colonies in French West Africa (Domergue-Cloarec,1986). This fundamentally hindered the Ivorian government's agency in managing its public funds and investing in healthcare infrastructure, making it extremely harder to develop health financing initiatives that could benefit the public healthcare system.
Colonialism not only choked trying to confine Africans to tribal cages and extract from their export products destroying established socioeconomic structures but completely devasted the intrinsic political dynamics of states such as Côte D'Ivoire (Cooper, 2002).
Over time, policy-making was still very much tied to France's expansionist ideas, though Côte D'Ivoire was starting to shape its health policy paradigm. It gained momentum at the beginning of the 1900s when the Health service of Colonial Troops was established to develop public health policies in French West Africa (AOF), specifically related to the sustainable management of public funds to be invested in public healthcare infrastructures (Domergue-Cloarec, 1986). This exemplifies the nature of the Ivorian government derived from colonialism: a failing political structure destined to struggle to implement policies to develop the healthcare sector systematically. Although many might affirm that this lack of agency by the Ivorian government is linked to the devastating colonial rule it was subjected to for decades, it is essential to consider that in the last years of colonial rule and after independence in the 1960s, Côte D'Ivoire gained major political agency (Kimenyi; Mbaku, 2011). During the Second World War, Côte D'Ivoire implemented a four-year plan to improve health infrastructure. This allowed for the ameliorated utilisation of public funds for healthcare infrastructure requalification projects which led to an increase in public hospitals, 20 by 1960, and public health centres (Gaber; Patel, 2013). The expansion of public healthcare services in the country increased, supported by a growing number of African doctors and a more conspicuous health budget financed through the mobilisation of tax revenues (Gaber; Patel, 2013).
This constitutes a significant success at the beginning of the country's evolution and development of public healthcare. However, the domestic political choices and policy implementation dynamics reinforced deep limitations such as economic inequality between the northern and southern areas of the country. Public health services were utilised mainly by wealthy Ivorians in the urban south, who also benefited from the birth of private healthcare (Lasker, 1977). The experience of colonial rule in Côte D'Ivoire illustrates the influence that colonialism had in shaping domestic political structures that, notwithstanding producing some successes, largely contributed to severe and devastating limits.
South Africa constitutes an interesting case study for analysing health financing initiatives towards the requalification of public healthcare as the latter suffered from the social and political consequences of Apartheid. Using the critique of national democratic systems of power in Africa presented above, it is possible to claim that Apartheid and the racial division system it imposed had a significant impact on how public policies were made. This was due to the "apparent democratic system" in the nation, which systematically tried to deny the Black majority access to the benefits of public health infrastructures (Cooper, 2002). Although Apartheid cannot be defined as a pure democracy, it was born after fair elections carried out in 1948, which allowed the National Party to win.
Apartheid can be described as the system of the racial segregation imposed by the elected National Party, an all-white government of South Africa which requested that nonwhite South Africans, the majority of the population, live and reside in different areas from their white counterparts, utilise different public facilities and stop interactions with whites (Africa Union, 2016). This system of institutionalised racism accounts for the main argument of this paper: domestic political choices are the primary factors that need to be considered when evaluating the successes and limits of economic development policies.
The South African government, for decades, instituted a political system apt at spreading and fostering inequality that could not allow the fair implementation of public and economic policies. From the 1960s, during the birth of Apartheid itself, the enhancement of public healthcare became an instrument of Apartheid policy in South Africa. As the racial segregation established in the country wanted, an adamant divide between public expenditure on the health services for Whites compared to that for Coloureds, Indians and Africans determined acutely economic disparities between public health services for Whites and non-Whites. This showcases how health policy was exploited to foster white supremacy in South Africa (Price, 1986). In the last decade of the 1900s, the public healthcare system in South Africa was the most significant part of the economy and received the most national public expenditure. Evidence-based research conducted by many academics such as Max Price, scholar and former vice-chancellor and principal of the University of Cape Town, found out that public expenditure on health services was an evident political response to social pressures: the National Party, in order to retain the support from the poor White community that could not afford private healthcare, heavily invested in ameliorating the public sector making it affordable and somewhat effective, succeeding in securing support for the party (Price, 1986).
Some scholars may disagree with the centrality of domestic political choices and dynamics in explaining the successes and limits of significant development policies such as health financing, affirming that limits inherent in geography and location offer a better explanation for the consequences of public policies. Two prominent scholars, David Bloom and Jeffrey Sachs, affirmed that Sub-Saharan Africa's poor economic growth over the centuries, as well as its exploitative relationships with the global world, are the cause of extraordinarily disadvantageous geography (Bloom et al., 1198). Although geography and academic theories around the politics of geography of Africa seek to analyse poverty, political unbalances, and economic stagnation in the African region, they tend to forget the
agency of African countries after gaining independence in the 1960s, as well as the strength of domestic political systems and decisions. Domestic political systems in African countries shaped how society, governments, international relations and the economy function daily (Fortes; Evans-Pritchard,1940). Geography cannot simply explain the unequal power dynamics reinforced by states' behaviours, offering a limited set of reasons why public policies cannot always benefit all.
This is the idea brought forward by authors M. Fortes and E.E. Evans-Pritchard, who argued that by analysing African political institutions through a social anthropological lens, it is possible to see the impact that each national political choice or behaviour has on society, politics, relations between countries and the economy at large (Fortes; EvansPritchard, 1940). This emphasises that domestic political choices and dynamics constitute the best tools to explain the successes and limits of public and economic development policies. The successes and limits of health financing in Côte D’Ivoire and South Africa
Since the 1960s, the African continent has understood the importance of focusing on health financing initiatives to ameliorate the failing public healthcare system that characterises many countries in the region (Gottret; Schieber, 2006). However, this understanding was negatively impacted by the different political structures and forms of governments affecting the African continent in the 20th century. From political and colonial systems and economic exploitation to racial segregation and inequality perpetuated by the government, African countries, mainly Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa, experienced significant difficulties in successfully implementing such policies (Harsch, 2018).
Nonetheless, what are the crucial successes and limits that domestic political choices and dynamics have influenced over the years when dealing with health financing itself? When talking about health financing measures in Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa, we are mainly referring to the mobilisation of tax revenues of public funds by these African governments to finance public health infrastructure projects and investing in health personnel (HRH) which is directly linked to economic growth (OECD, 2020).
If we focus on Côte D’Ivoire, publicly-funded hospitals have never had a good reputation. They lack the economic resources, the adapt technological innovation and professional health personnel to face severe health conditions such as Malaria or Cholera, major detrimental health episodes for the country (Granado; Manderson; Obrist; Tanner, 2011). In Côte D’Ivoire, successes of health financing initiatives are defined as the development and improvement of public health infrastructure, the investment made in health personnel and an increase in access to public health for the poor. Unfortunately, due to domestic political dynamics, these successes have been bound to not see the light of day for a long time. From the 1960s until the 1980s, only 2% of public expenditure was allocated to the public healthcare sector (World Health Organisation, 2020). However, at the beginning of the 21st century, the country experienced rapid economic growth, which brought a new understanding of the importance of health financing for developing public healthcare. Following this idea, the 2006 – 2016 decade was fundamentally marked by two major global health initiatives: the Global Health Manpower Alliance (GHWA) and the adoption of the Recife Political Declaration during the 67th World Health Assembly in 2014, which strongly emphasised the role of the health workforce in leading towards universal health coverage (Guédé; Yapi; Kouakou, 2021). This was possible thanks to the Ivorian government's understanding of the importance of investing and managing public funds more accurately to serve public health in the country better. The successes and limits showcased by health financing measures adopted in Côte D'Ivoire still demonstrate the central role played by domestic political choices and dynamics.
South Africa's health financing measures to develop public healthcare are deeply rooted in the dismantling of racial power dynamics that created social inequity between white and Non-white communities in the country. The country's experience indicates the strong influence of political factors and actors over which healthcare financing measures were implemented and the overall characteristics of policy design (Gilson et al., 2003). The moment of political transition experienced in the country with the death of Apartheid in 1994 provided the Minister of Health of the country with many opportunities to modify, model, or introduce new public and economic development policies. (Gilson et al., 2003). The political and bureaucratic restructuring that the country experienced after the elections in 1994 comprised the birth of a new political system: a quasi-federal structure with the establishment of a district health system and, consequently, decentralisation in decision-making processes in the health sector (Gilson et al., 2003). South Africa's health financing measures' successes were, and still are, two-folds: the dismantling of racial segregation of the public health system, which, from 1994 onwards, is legally carried out to benefit all races in society, and the increasing of revenue-raising and funding levels utilised to fund public healthcare centres and infrastructure for everyone (Atim et al., 2021). These successes were possible because of the changes in the domestic political structure of the state as well as national political dynamics that succeeded in ameliorating health financing to develop and enhance social equity within public health services.
Conclusion
To conclude, this paper highlights how domestic political dynamics and choices from the 1960s until the 2010s still play a massive role in determining the successes and limits of economic development policies aimed at improving public health infrastructure projects in both Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa. Analysing democratic political systems in the African continent helps to understand the intrinsic link between domestic political dynamics and the implementation of public policies. When assessing the validity and the results, both detrimental or beneficial, of diverse economic development policies implemented in African countries, it is important to clearly look at how historical political factors intertwined with countries’ ability to implement successful economic development policies. In the development or underdevelopment of public healthcare in Côte D'Ivoire and South Africa, the responsible factors are domestic political choices and dynamics which disproportionally impact policy implementation.
Furthermore, the political experiences of colonialism in Côte D'Ivoire and Apartheid in South Africa demonstrate the robust ties between political dynamics and the achievements and limitations of health financing measures in these countries over time. The colonial system and the institutional racial segregation fundamentally modified domestic political choices and dynamics so profoundly that it is impossible to affirm that they do not play a fundamental role in developing health financing measures. Successes and limits of economic development policies, such as increasing the number of public hospitals in Côte D'Ivoire or increasing the access of public healthcare to only poor White communities to maintain political power in South Africa, are examples that lead us to believe that, indeed, domestic political dynamics and choices still constitute the primary factors to consider when assessing economic development policies.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adejumobi, S. (2015). National Democratic Reforms in Africa: Changes and Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan US.
Adejumobi, S. (2020). Voice and Power in Africa’s Democracy: Institutions, Participation and Accountability. Taylor & Francis Group.
African Union. (2016). AUHRM Project Focus Area: The Apartheid. African Union. Accessed on 5th January 2023: https://au.int/en/auhrm-project-focusareaapartheid#:~:text=The%20Apartheid%20(1948%20to%201994,contact%20between %20the%20two%20groups
Atim, C; Bhushan, I; Blecher, M; Gandham, R; Rajan, V; Davén, J; Adeyi, O. (2021). Health Financing Reforms for Universal Health Coverage in Five Emerging Economies. Journal of Global Health. Vol. 11: 16004, pp. 1 – 11.
Bloom, D, E; Sachs, J, D; Collier, P; Udry, C. (1998). Geography, Demography, and Economic Growth in Africa. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 1998, Issue 2. pp. 211.
Chafer, T. (2002). The End of Empire in French West Africa: France’s Successful Decolonization? Berg.
Cooper, F. (2002). Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present. Cambridge University Press.pp. 20 - 37
Domergue-Cloarec, D. (1986). Politique coloniale française et réalités coloniales: la santéen Côte d'Ivoire 1905–1958 [French colonial Policy and colonial Realities: Health in Côte d'Ivoire]. Association des publications de l'Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail. Accessed on 5th January 2023: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? hl=en&publication_year=1986&author=D.+DomergueCloarec&title=Politique+coloniale+fr an%C3%A7aise+et+r%C3%A9alit%C3%A9s+coloniales%3A+la+sant%C3%A9+en+C% C3%B4te+d%27Ivoire+1905%E2%80%931958
Gaber, S; Patel, P. (2013). Tracing health system in post-conflict Côte D’Ivoire from 1893 to 2013. An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice. Vol. 8, Issue 6.
Gardern, L, A. (2012). Taxing Colonial Africa: The Political Economy of British Imperialism. Oxford University Press. pp. 1 – 4.
Gilley, B. (2009). Is Democracy Possible? Journal of Democracy, No. 20 (1), pp 113-126.
Gilson, L; Doherty, J; Lake, S; McIntyre, D; Mwikisa, C; Thomas, S. (2003). The Saza Study: Implementing Health Financing Reform in South Africa and Zambia. Oxford University Press. Vol. 18(1), pp. 31 – 46.
Google Scholar, (2020). About the Author. Accessed 3rd January 2023: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Voice_and_Power_in_Africa_s_Democracy.html? id=MjYrxQEACAAJ&source=kp_author_description&redir_esc=y
Gottret, P; Schieber, G. (2006). Health Financing Revisited, A Practitioner’s Guide. The World Bank.
Green, P. (1985). Retrieving Democracy: In Search of Civic Equality. Rowman & Allanheld.
Guédé, R; Yapi, A; Kouakou, A, K. (2021). Health Financing and Economic Growth in Côte D’Ivoire.Moroccan Journal of Public Health. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 4 – 15.
Harsch, E. (2018). Combating Africa’s inequalities. Africa Renewal. Accessed on 2nd January 2023: https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/december-2017-march2018/combatingafrica%E2%80%99s-inequalities
Kimenyi, M, S; Mbaku, J, M. (2011). What’s Next for Ivory Coast. Brookings. Accessed on 6th January 2023: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/what-next-for-ivory-coast/
Lasker, J, N. (1977). The Role of Health Services in Colonial Rule: The Case of the Ivory Coast. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. No. 1(3), pp 227 – 297.
OECD. (2020). Mobilising Tax Revenues to Finance the Health System in Côte D’Ivoire. OECD. Accessed on 2nd January 2023: https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/mobilisingtax-revenues-tofinance-the-health-system-in-cote-ivoire.htm
Price, M. (1988). Health Care as an Instrument of Apartheid policy in South Africa. Oxford University Press. No. 1(2), pp. 158 – 170.
World Health Organisation. (2020). Health Financing. World Health Organisations Health Topics. Accessed on 2nd January 2023: https://www.who.int/health-topics/healthfinancing#tab=tab_1
(SOTTO)SVILUPPO DELLA SANITÀ PUBBLICA: CHI È RESPONSABILE? VALUTAZIONE DEL RUOLO DELLE DINAMICHE POLITICHE NAZIONALI NELLE MISURE DI FINANZIAMENTO
Introduzione
Questo saggio concorda con l'idea che le decisioni e le dinamiche politiche nazionali costituiscano i fattori più critici nello spiegare e influenzare i successi e i limiti delle misure di finanziamento sanitario volte a migliorare l'infrastruttura sanitaria pubblica sia in Costa d'Avorio che in Sudafrica. Infatti, la loro struttura fallace, influenzata da eventi storici che hanno intrinsecamente modificato il processo decisionale in questi due paesi, ci porta a credere che le istituzioni politiche nazionali siano profondamente legate ai successi e ai limiti della politica di sviluppo economico.
Le dinamiche politiche nazionali sono state al centro dell'elaborazione delle politiche dal colonialismo attraverso l'Apartheid fino all'acquisizione di autonomia politica da parte dei governi ivoriano e sudafricano. I loro cambiamenti hanno influenzato, e continuano a influenzare, il finanziamento sanitario destinato a migliorare la sanità pubblica. La Costa d'Avorio e il Sudafrica sono scelti come casi di studio in questo saggio poiché le loro esperienze storiche e politiche dimostrano l'impatto fondamentale che i fattori politici nazionali hanno sui successi e sui limiti della progettazione delle politiche.
Secondo l'Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, il finanziamento sanitario è una politica economica e pubblica al centro dei sistemi sanitari che guida il progresso sociale verso la copertura sanitaria universale migliorando un'adeguata copertura dei servizi e la protezione finanziaria (Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, 2020). Pertanto, il finanziamento sanitario è una politica istituzionale che comprende tre strategie economiche e finanziarie primarie: aumento delle entrate, messa in comune dei fondi e acquisto di servizi. La crescita delle entrate ha a che fare con la natura delle fonti di finanziamento prese in considerazione; possono variare dai bilanci governativi, ai regimi assicurativi prepagati, ai pagamenti diretti da parte dei cittadini o agli aiuti esterni da organizzazioni internazionali o altri paesi. Il termine messa in comune dei fondi designa il processo di accumulo di fondi prepagati per conto di una parte o di tutta la popolazione. Infine, con l'acquisto di servizi, definiamo il processo di allocazione dei fondi pubblici al settore sanitario per sviluppare la sua struttura, il personale e il funzionamento complessivo (Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, 2020).
I successi delle politiche di sviluppo economico, come il finanziamento sanitario, sono definiti in questo documento come l'espansione graduale degli ospedali pubblici a livello nazionale, l'uso responsabile delle entrate fiscali, l'eliminazione della segregazione razziale imposta dal governo nel settore pubblico e un aumento del numero di professionisti sanitari. Le limitazioni includono quelle imposte da precedenti sistemi politici di sfruttamento, il controllo coloniale nel caso della Costa d'Avorio e il razzismo sistemico in Sudafrica, nonché l'allargamento del divario economico tra le comunità ivoriane del Nord e del Sud.
Questo saggio valuterà innanzitutto criticamente le dinamiche politiche nazionali relative all'emergere di istituzioni democratiche in Africa che influenzano fortemente il successo o il fallimento dell'implementazione delle politiche di sviluppo economico. Analizzerà quindi il ruolo svolto dal colonialismo in Costa d'Avorio e dall'Apartheid in Sudafrica nella formazione di dinamiche politiche nazionali che favoriscono o ostacolano lo sviluppo di politiche pubbliche come il finanziamento sanitario. Infine, evidenzierà i risultati significativi e le limitazioni del finanziamento sanitario sia in Costa d'Avorio che in Sudafrica dalla fine del XX secolo fino agli anni 2010, evidenziando il ruolo delle scelte e delle dinamiche politiche nazionali.
Dinamiche politiche nazionali e istituzioni democratiche in Africa
Un'analisi approfondita dei successi e dei limiti del finanziamento sanitario sia in Costa d'Avorio che in Sudafrica richiede la valutazione critica del ruolo della politica e delle forme politiche di governo e della loro influenza sulle politiche di sviluppo economico nel continente africano. È stato ampiamente suggerito dalla letteratura occidentale in scienze politiche che le forme di governo di tendenza democratica portano a una società più stabile, economicamente fiorente e più equa, in cui le popolazioni possono accedere e beneficiare di diritti e doveri (Green, 1985). Questa idea completa perfettamente la nozione che il fallimento delle politiche di sviluppo economico nel migliorare le condizioni socio-politiche ed economiche di un paese non potrebbe essere il risultato di scelte e dinamiche politiche nazionali. Tuttavia, questo concetto ideologico non si applica alla realtà. Infatti, nella vita quotidiana, i governi democratici nazionali, che si basano intrinsecamente sull'essere "più ricchi, più giusti, più innovativi e migliori nel rispettare i diritti rispetto alle alternative disponibili" (Gilley, 2009), non sono sempre efficaci nel gestire le conseguenze sociali e politiche delle politiche pubbliche implementate, peggiorando spesso queste ultime. Questo è ciò che Adejumobi afferma nel suo libro intitolato "Riforme Democratiche Nazionali in Africa: Cambiamenti e Sfide". L'autore sostiene che la performance democratica globale è stata sottoposta a numerose critiche poiché il potere democratico ha dimostrato di essere costruito sulle fondamenta di una falsa idea di uguaglianza che non beneficia tutti nella società (Adejumobi, 2015).
La democrazia e il potere democratico non riescono a soddisfare i loro scopi di creare un sistema politico più giusto ed equo per tutti per quanto riguarda l'amministrazione pratica delle istituzioni democratiche e dei meccanismi partecipativi. Nonostante le intenzioni positive della democrazia, la debolezza delle istituzioni democratiche e della struttura politica non consente ai paesi, specialmente ai paesi democratici nel continente africano, di implementare con successo politiche pubbliche volte alla crescita economica dello stato (Adejumobi, 2020). Tuttavia, la natura intrinsecamente fallimentare del potere democratico in molti paesi africani risale a eventi storici che hanno gravemente influenzato l'autonomia e la struttura politica degli stati ivoriano e sudafricano. Quando si tratta della politica di sviluppo economico in questione, il finanziamento sanitario, le eredità coloniali fiscali che plasmano il processo decisionale dello stato nel XX secolo, la cattiva gestione dei fondi pubblici da parte dello stato nel XXI secolo in Costa d'Avorio, così come la segregazione
razziale in Sudafrica sono le principali dinamiche politiche che hanno fondamentalmente reso le scelte politiche nazionali il determinante più cruciale nello spiegare i successi e i limiti delle politiche di sviluppo economico.
L'impatto del colonialismo francese sulla sanità pubblica in Costa d'Avorio Una solida comprensione storica dell'impatto del colonialismo sull'autonomia del governo della Costa d'Avorio nel controllare il suo territorio e, di conseguenza, le sue politiche pubbliche, è essenziale per contestualizzare adeguatamente le misure di finanziamento sanitario che affrontano i bisogni sanitari a lungo termine (Gaber; Patel, 2013). I sistemi fiscali coloniali sono strumenti essenziali utilizzati dalle potenze imperialiste in Africa, che hanno profondamente influenzato l'istituzione delle istituzioni governative, rendendo impossibile che le dinamiche politiche nazionali non siano l'elemento primario da considerare quando si valutano le conseguenze delle politiche di sviluppo economico (Gardner, 2012).
Il colonialismo francese ha contribuito gravemente a plasmare le strutture politiche nazionali ivoriane nell'affrontare le politiche pubbliche verso lo sviluppo del sistema sanitario pubblico. L'evoluzione delle misure di finanziamento sanitario era intrinsecamente legata agli obiettivi politici, economici e sociali francesi. Prima del 1900, i servizi sanitari in Costa d'Avorio erano mirati a sostenere gli obiettivi di espansione regionale francese. Ciò è evidente perché il settore sanitario era finanziato solo per aiutare i soldati, gli amministratori francesi, gli esploratori o i missionari (Gaber; Patel, 2013).
Questo evidenzia come il colonialismo abbia profondamente plasmato le dinamiche politiche nazionali in Costa d'Avorio, che necessariamente divennero il centro delle risposte politiche regionali. Nei primi quattro o cinque decenni del XX secolo, il finanziamento sanitario iniziò a somigliare a investimenti esteri diretti dalla metropoli, Parigi, alle colonie nell'Africa occidentale francese (Domergue-Cloarec, 1986). Questo ostacolò fondamentalmente l'autonomia del governo ivoriano
nella gestione dei suoi fondi pubblici e nell'investimento nelle infrastrutture sanitarie, rendendo estremamente più difficile sviluppare iniziative di finanziamento sanitario che potessero beneficiare il sistema sanitario pubblico. Il colonialismo non solo soffocò cercando di confinare gli africani in gabbie tribali ed estrarre dai loro prodotti di esportazione distruggendo le strutture socioeconomiche consolidate, ma devastò completamente le dinamiche politiche intrinseche di stati come la Costa d'Avorio (Cooper, 2002). Nel tempo, l'elaborazione delle politiche era ancora molto legata alle idee espansionistiche della Francia, sebbene la Costa d'Avorio stesse iniziando a plasmare il suo paradigma di politica sanitaria.
Prese slancio all'inizio del 1900 quando fu istituito il Servizio Sanitario delle Truppe Coloniali per sviluppare politiche di sanità pubblica nell'Africa occidentale francese (AOF), specificamente relative alla gestione sostenibile dei fondi pubblici da investire nelle infrastrutture sanitarie pubbliche (Domergue-Cloarec, 1986). Questo esemplifica la natura del governo ivoriano derivata dal colonialismo: una struttura politica fallimentare destinata a lottare per implementare politiche per sviluppare sistematicamente il settore sanitario. Sebbene molti possano affermare che questa mancanza di autonomia da parte del governo ivoriano sia legata al devastante dominio coloniale a cui fu sottoposto per decenni, è essenziale considerare che negli ultimi anni del dominio coloniale e dopo l'indipendenza negli anni '60, la Costa d'Avorio acquisì una maggiore autonomia politica (Kimenyi; Mbaku, 2011). Durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale, la Costa d'Avorio implementò un piano quadriennale per migliorare l'infrastruttura sanitaria. Ciò permise un migliore utilizzo dei fondi pubblici per i progetti di riqualificazione delle infrastrutture sanitarie che portarono a un aumento degli ospedali pubblici, 20 entro il 1960, e dei centri di sanità pubblica (Gaber; Patel, 2013). L'espansione dei servizi sanitari pubblici nel paese aumentò, sostenuta da un numero crescente di medici africani e da un bilancio sanitario più cospicuo finanziato attraverso la mobilitazione delle entrate fiscali (Gaber; Patel, 2013).
Questo costituisce un successo significativo all'inizio dell'evoluzione e dello sviluppo della sanità pubblica del paese. Tuttavia, le scelte politiche nazionali e le dinamiche di implementazione delle politiche rafforzarono profonde limitazioni come la disuguaglianza economica tra le aree settentrionali e meridionali del paese. I servizi di sanità pubblica erano utilizzati principalmente da ivoriani benestanti nel sud urbano, che beneficiarono anche della nascita della sanità privata (Lasker, 1977). L'esperienza del dominio coloniale in Costa d'Avorio illustra l'influenza che il colonialismo ha avuto nel plasmare le strutture politiche nazionali che, nonostante producano alcuni successi, hanno largamente contribuito a gravi e devastanti limiti.
Apartheid e tendenze razziali nei servizi sanitari in Sudafrica
Il Sudafrica costituisce un interessante caso di studio per l'analisi delle iniziative di finanziamento sanitario verso la riqualificazione della sanità pubblica poiché quest'ultima ha sofferto delle conseguenze sociali e politiche dell'Apartheid. Utilizzando la critica dei sistemi democratici nazionali di potere in Africa presentata sopra, è possibile affermare che l'Apartheid e il sistema di divisione razziale che impose ebbero un impatto significativo su come furono elaborate le politiche pubbliche. Ciò era dovuto al "sistema democratico apparente" nella nazione, che sistematicamente cercò di negare alla maggioranza nera l'accesso ai benefici delle infrastrutture sanitarie pubbliche (Cooper, 2002). Sebbene l'Apartheid non possa essere definito una democrazia pura, nacque dopo elezioni eque effettuate nel 1948, che permisero al Partito Nazionale di vincere.
L'Apartheid può essere descritto come il sistema di segregazione razziale imposto dal Partito Nazionale eletto, un governo tutto bianco del Sudafrica che richiedeva che i sudafricani non bianchi, la maggioranza della popolazione, vivessero e risiedessero in
aree diverse dalle loro controparti bianche, utilizzassero strutture pubbliche diverse e interrompessero le interazioni con i bianchi (Unione Africana, 2016). Questo sistema di razzismo istituzionalizzato spiega l'argomento principale di questo documento: le scelte politiche nazionali sono i fattori primari che devono essere considerati quando si valutano i successi e i limiti delle politiche di sviluppo economico. Il governo sudafricano, per decenni, istituì un sistema politico atto a diffondere e promuovere la disuguaglianza che non poteva permettere l'implementazione equa di politiche pubbliche ed economiche. Dagli anni '60, durante la nascita dell'Apartheid stesso, il miglioramento della sanità pubblica divenne uno strumento della politica dell'Apartheid in Sudafrica. Come voleva la segregazione razziale stabilita nel paese, una divisione ferma tra la spesa pubblica per i servizi sanitari per i bianchi rispetto a quella per i meticci, gli indiani e gli africani determinò disparità economiche acute tra i servizi sanitari pubblici per i bianchi e i non bianchi. Questo dimostra come la politica sanitaria sia stata sfruttata per promuovere la supremazia bianca in Sudafrica (Price, 1986). Nell'ultimo decennio del 1900, il sistema sanitario pubblico in Sudafrica era la parte più significativa dell'economia e riceveva la maggiore spesa pubblica nazionale. La ricerca basata su prove condotta da molti accademici come Max Price, studioso ed ex vice-cancelliere e preside dell'Università di Città del Capo, ha scoperto che la spesa pubblica per i servizi sanitari era un'evidente risposta politica alle pressioni sociali: il Partito Nazionale, al fine di mantenere il sostegno della comunità bianca povera che non poteva permettersi l'assistenza sanitaria privata, investì pesantemente nel migliorare il settore pubblico rendendolo accessibile e in qualche modo efficace, riuscendo a garantire il sostegno per il partito (Price, 1986).
Alcuni studiosi potrebbero non essere d'accordo con la centralità delle scelte e delle dinamiche politiche nazionali nello spiegare i successi e i limiti di importanti politiche di sviluppo come il finanziamento sanitario, affermando che i limiti inerenti alla geografia e alla posizione offrono una spiegazione migliore per le conseguenze delle politiche pubbliche. Due eminenti studiosi, David Bloom e Jeffrey Sachs, hanno affermato che la scarsa crescita economica dell'Africa subsahariana nel corso dei secoli, così come le sue relazioni di sfruttamento con il mondo globale, sono la causa di una "geografia straordinariamente svantaggiosa" (Bloom et al., 1198). Sebbene la geografia e le teorie accademiche sulla politica della geografia dell'Africa cerchino di analizzare la povertà, gli squilibri politici e la stagnazione economica nella regione africana, tendono a dimenticare l'autonomia dei paesi africani dopo aver ottenuto l'indipendenza negli anni '60, così come la forza dei sistemi e delle decisioni politiche nazionali. I sistemi politici nazionali nei paesi africani hanno plasmato il modo in cui la società, i governi, le relazioni internazionali e l'economia funzionano quotidianamente (Fortes; Evans-Pritchard, 1940).
La geografia non può semplicemente spiegare le dinamiche di potere diseguali rafforzate dai comportamenti degli stati, offrendo una serie limitata di ragioni per cui le politiche pubbliche non possono sempre beneficiare tutti. Questa è l'idea portata avanti dagli autori M. Fortes ed E.E. Evans-Pritchard, che hanno sostenuto che analizzando le istituzioni politiche africane attraverso una lente antropologica sociale, è possibile vedere l'impatto che ogni scelta o comportamento politico nazionale ha sulla società, la politica, le relazioni tra i paesi e l'economia in generale (Fortes; Evans-Pritchard, 1940). Questo sottolinea che le scelte e le dinamiche politiche nazionali costituiscono gli strumenti migliori per spiegare i successi e i limiti delle politiche di sviluppo pubblico ed economico.
I successi e i limiti del finanziamento sanitario in Costa d'Avorio e Sudafrica Dagli anni '60, il continente africano ha compreso l'importanza di concentrarsi sulle iniziative di finanziamento sanitario per migliorare il sistema sanitario pubblico fallimentare che caratterizza molti paesi della regione (Gottret; Schieber, 2006). Tuttavia, questa comprensione è stata influenzata negativamente dalle diverse strutture politiche e forme di governo che hanno interessato il continente africano nel XX secolo. Dai sistemi politici e coloniali e dallo sfruttamento economico alla segregazione razziale e alla disuguaglianza perpetuata dal governo, i paesi africani, principalmente la Costa d'Avorio e il Sudafrica, hanno sperimentato difficoltà significative nell'implementare con successo tali politiche (Harsch, 2018). Tuttavia, quali sono i successi e i limiti cruciali che le scelte e le dinamiche politiche nazionali hanno influenzato nel corso degli anni quando si tratta del finanziamento sanitario stesso? Quando parliamo di misure di finanziamento sanitario in Costa d'Avorio e Sudafrica, ci riferiamo principalmente alla mobilitazione delle entrate fiscali dei fondi pubblici da parte di questi governi africani per finanziare progetti di infrastrutture sanitarie pubbliche e investire nel personale sanitario (HRH) che è direttamente collegato alla crescita economica (OCSE, 2020).
Se ci concentriamo sulla Costa d'Avorio, gli ospedali finanziati pubblicamente non hanno mai avuto una buona reputazione. Mancano delle risorse economiche, dell'innovazione tecnologica adeguata e del personale sanitario professionale per affrontare gravi condizioni di salute come la malaria o il colera, episodi di salute gravemente dannosi per il paese (Granado; Manderson; Obrist; Tanner, 2011).
In Costa d'Avorio, i successi delle iniziative di finanziamento sanitario sono definiti come lo sviluppo e il miglioramento delle infrastrutture sanitarie pubbliche, l'investimento fatto nel personale sanitario e un aumento dell'accesso alla sanità pubblica per i poveri. Sfortunatamente, a causa delle dinamiche politiche nazionali, questi successi sono stati destinati a non vedere la luce del giorno per molto tempo. Dagli anni '60 fino agli anni '80, solo il 2% della spesa pubblica è stato allocato al settore sanitario pubblico (Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, 2020). Tuttavia, all'inizio del XXI secolo, il paese ha sperimentato una rapida crescita economica, che ha portato una nuova comprensione dell'importanza del finanziamento sanitario per lo sviluppo della sanità pubblica. Seguendo questa idea, il decennio 2006-2016 è stato fondamentalmente segnato da due importanti iniziative sanitarie globali: la Global Health Manpower Alliance (GHWA) e l'adozione della Dichiarazione Politica di Recife durante la 67ª Assemblea Mondiale della Sanità nel 2014, che ha fortemente sottolineato il ruolo della forza lavoro sanitaria nel guidare verso la copertura sanitaria universale (Guédé; Yapi; Kouakou, 2021). Ciò è stato possibile grazie alla comprensione del governo ivoriano dell'importanza di investire e gestire i fondi pubblici in modo più accurato per servire meglio la sanità pubblica nel paese. I successi e i limiti mostrati dalle misure di finanziamento sanitario adottate in Costa d'Avorio dimostrano ancora il ruolo centrale svolto dalle scelte e dalle dinamiche politiche nazionali.
Le misure di finanziamento sanitario del Sudafrica per sviluppare la sanità pubblica sono profondamente radicate nello smantellamento delle dinamiche di potere razziale che hanno creato l'inequità sociale tra le comunità bianche e non bianche nel paese.
L'esperienza del paese indica la forte influenza dei fattori e degli attori politici su quali misure di finanziamento sanitario sono state implementate e sulle caratteristiche complessive della progettazione delle politiche (Gilson et al., 2003). Il momento di transizione politica sperimentato nel paese con la morte dell'Apartheid nel 1994 ha fornito al Ministro della Sanità del paese molte opportunità per modificare, modellare o introdurre nuove politiche pubbliche e di sviluppo economico (Gilson et al., 2003). La ristrutturazione politica e burocratica che il paese ha sperimentato dopo le elezioni del 1994 comprese la nascita di un nuovo sistema politico: una struttura quasi federale con l'istituzione di un sistema sanitario distrettuale e, di conseguenza, la decentralizzazione nei processi decisionali nel settore sanitario (Gilson et al., 2003).
I successi delle misure di finanziamento sanitario del Sudafrica erano, e sono ancora, duplici: lo smantellamento della segregazione razziale del sistema sanitario pubblico, che dal 1994 in poi è legalmente effettuato a beneficio di tutte le razze nella società, e l'aumento dei livelli di raccolta delle entrate e dei finanziamenti utilizzati per finanziare i centri sanitari pubblici e le infrastrutture per tutti (Atim et al., 2021). Questi successi sono stati possibili grazie ai cambiamenti nella struttura politica nazionale dello stato così come alle dinamiche politiche nazionali che sono riuscite a migliorare il finanziamento sanitario per sviluppare e migliorare l'equità sociale all'interno dei servizi sanitari pubblici.
Conclusione
Per concludere, questo documento evidenzia come le dinamiche e le scelte politiche nazionali dagli anni '60 fino agli anni 2010 giochino ancora un ruolo enorme nel determinare i successi e i limiti delle politiche di sviluppo economico volte a migliorare i progetti di infrastrutture sanitarie pubbliche sia in Costa d'Avorio che in Sudafrica. L'analisi dei sistemi politici democratici nel continente africano aiuta a comprendere il legame intrinseco tra le dinamiche politiche nazionali e l'implementazione delle politiche pubbliche.
Nel valutare la validità e i risultati, sia dannosi che benefici, di diverse politiche di sviluppo economico implementate nei paesi africani, è importante guardare chiaramente a come i fattori politici storici si siano intrecciati con la capacità dei paesi di implementare politiche di sviluppo economico di successo. Nello sviluppo o sottosviluppo della sanità pubblica in Costa d'Avorio e Sudafrica, i fattori responsabili sono le scelte e le dinamiche politiche nazionali che hanno un impatto sproporzionato sull'implementazione delle politiche.
Inoltre, le esperienze politiche del colonialismo in Costa d'Avorio e dell'Apartheid in Sudafrica dimostrano i forti legami tra le dinamiche politiche e i risultati e le limitazioni delle misure di finanziamento sanitario in questi paesi nel tempo.
Il sistema coloniale e la segregazione razziale istituzionale hanno modificato fondamentalmente le scelte e le dinamiche politiche nazionali in modo così profondo che è impossibile affermare che non svolgano un ruolo fondamentale nello sviluppo delle misure di finanziamento sanitario. I successi e i limiti delle politiche di sviluppo economico, come l'aumento del numero di ospedali pubblici in Costa d'Avorio o l'aumento dell'accesso alla sanità pubblica solo alle comunità bianche povere per mantenere il potere politico in Sudafrica, sono esempi che ci portano a credere che, infatti, le dinamiche e le scelte politiche nazionali costituiscano ancora i fattori primari da considerare quando si valutano le politiche di sviluppo economico.
Adejumobi, S. (2015). National Democratic Reforms in Africa: Changes and Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan US.
Adejumobi, S. (2020). Voice and Power in Africa's Democracy: Institutions, Participation and Accountability. Taylor & Francis Group.
African Union. (2016). AUHRM Project Focus Area: The Apartheid. African Union.
Atim, C; Bhushan, I; Blecher, M; Gandham, R; Rajan, V; Davén, J; Adeyi, O. (2021). Health Financing Reforms for Universal Health Coverage in Five Emerging Economies. Journal of Global Health. Vol. 11: 16004, pp. 1 – 11.
Bloom, D, E; Sachs, J, D; Collier, P; Udry, C. (1998). Geography, Demography, and Economic Growth in Africa.
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 1998, Issue 2. pp. 211.
Chafer, T. (2002). The End of Empire in French West Africa: France's Successful Decolonization? Berg.
Cooper, F. (2002). Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present. Cambridge University Press. pp. 20 - 37
Domergue-Cloarec, D. (1986). Politique coloniale française et réalités coloniales: la santé en Côte d'Ivoire 1905–1958 [Politica coloniale francese e realtà coloniali: Salute in Costa d'Avorio]. Association des publications de l'Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.
Gaber, S; Patel, P. (2013). Tracing health system in post-conflict Côte D'Ivoire from 1893 to 2013. An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice. Vol. 8, Issue 6.
Gardern, L, A. (2012). Taxing Colonial Africa: The Political Economy of British Imperialism. Oxford University Press. pp. 1 – 4.
Gilley, B. (2009). Is Democracy Possible? Journal of Democracy, No. 20 (1), pp 113-126.
Gilson, L; Doherty, J; Lake, S; McIntyre, D; Mwikisa, C; Thomas, S. (2003). The Saza Study: Implementing Health Financing Reform in South Africa and Zambia. Oxford University Press. Vol. 18(1), pp. 31 – 46.
Google Scholar, (2020). About the Author.
Gottret, P; Schieber, G. (2006). Health Financing Revisited, A Practitioner's Guide. The World Bank.
Green, P. (1985). Retrieving Democracy: In Search of Civic Equality. Rowman & Allanheld.
Guédé, R; Yapi, A; Kouakou, A, K. (2021). Health Financing and Economic Growth in Côte D'Ivoire. Moroccan Journal of Public Health. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 4 – 15. Harsch, E. (2018). Combating Africa's inequalities. Africa Renewal. Kimenyi, M, S; Mbaku, J, M. (2011). What's Next for Ivory Coast. Brookings.
Lasker, J, N. (1977). The Role of Health Services in Colonial Rule: The Case of the Ivory Coast. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. No. 1(3), pp 227 – 297.
OECD. (2020). Mobilising Tax Revenues to Finance the Health System in Côte D'Ivoire. OECD.
Price, M. (1988). Health Care as an Instrument of Apartheid policy in South Africa. Oxford University Press. No. 1(2), pp. 158 – 170.
World Health Organisation. (2020). Health Financing. World Health Organisations Health Topics.
Through the Ariel Foundation
International – Multimedia University Malaysia Project, students found a space where their emotions were valued as deeply as their ambitions. By addressing the roots of stress, self-doubt, and academic disengagement, the initiative redefined what it means to learn with purpose.
When we listen to pain with empathy, we open doors to healing and resilience.
Ariel Foundation International explored the emotional realities behind student success. This project revealed that true education begins when institutions nurture both intellect and inner well-being When we understand the heart behind every student, learning becomes a journey of empowerment.
This initiative underscores the Foundation’s commitment to ensuring that education systems are responsive, inclusive, and grounded in empathy.
Supporting SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, SDG 4: Quality Education
Global Humanity & Diplomacy Fellow (GHDF), Ariel Foundation International Representative to the United Nations, New York, USA
Recently, I have spent a lot of time speaking with educators across the United States about their biggest concerns with teaching. Some stated they felt that teachers were undervalued and that schools as a whole are underfunded; however, the most pressing area of concern had nothing to do with policy or funding, but rather, the development of their students.
Through various independent conversations, teachers in California, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia expressed their frustration and disenchantment with how modern technology has negatively impacted their students.
Teachers reported that students were struggling to pay attention in class. Kids as young as 12 years old were unable to go through an entire class period without using their phones. Furthermore, teachers informed me that their children were also heavily relying on generative AI. Some stated that a few students were unable to turn in any assignments without the assistance of AI. Many teachers have been left to devise their own solutions to combat this problem; some have even resorted to working around it.
Issue Analysis: How is Artificial Intelligence Impacting the Youth?
According to the OSF Healthcare, the average screen time of young adults aged 15 to 18 ranges from 5 to 7.5 hours daily. Additionally, kids 8 to 10 are spending around 6 hours daily on their devices and kids 11 to 14 are spending around 9 hours on their devices daily. Each of these groups are spending between 20% and 38% of their day online, and the impact on their overall development is undeniable.
In an NPR article, Jim Steyer, CEO of Common Sense Media stated: “Young children now average two-and-ahalf hours of daily screen time,
predominantly watching short-form video content.” In this particular article, reporter Katie Riddle was primarily focused on examining the impacts of screen time on children ages 8 and younger.
With the rise of social media, generative AI, streaming services, and other technological programs, the manner in which modern youth take in and process information has completely changed. Kids no longer have to tirelessly search for information because tools have been developed to circumvent and streamline the research process. They no longer have to carefully read and parse through articles and other materials because they have AI tools that will summarize different sources and websites before even clicking on them. They do not need to “do the heavy lifting” because there is a plethora of programs that will do the work for them.
Additionally, with a rise in utility and efficiency of technology, it has coincided with a shift in consumer desire. The average kid is engrossed in entertainment media like TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels, etc. They consume short-form videos at an all-time high because their brains have been trained to seek instant gratification. Many kids are straying away from longer-form content, such as movies, books, plays, etc., because they refuse to pay attention for periods longer than a few minutes. Moreover, there is so much content that exists within these different platforms that it is almost impossible for the average parent to be knowledgeable about what information and how much information their child is consuming daily.
According to a study published by the American Psychology Association, Teens are spending an average of 4.8 hours on social media each day. YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok are the applications that accounted for over 87% of their overall usage. A more indepth analysis showed that “37% of teens say they spend 5 or more hours a day, 14% spend 4 to less than 5 hours a day, 26% spend 2 to less than 4 hours a day, and 23% spend less than 2 hours a day on these three apps.”
Given that globally young people are using technology at an alarming and unforeseen rate, the argument could possibly be made that they are being efficient with their technological use. Some kids have used social media to help create businesses, start careers, enhance their education, and increase their overall productivity; however, these kids tend to be the outliers. The pervading trend amongst youth and has been an overreliance on technology that has been detrimental to overall development.
According to the same APA study, 60% of the highest frequency social media users expressed that they had weak parental relationships, struggled with mental health. Additionally, according to a study conducted by researchers at Wharton and Penn, students who initially performed 48% better with AI assistance. performed 17% worse than students without AI assistance when their access to AI was taken away.
Part of the mind’s beauty is its capacity for originality. Providing children with a tool that is essentially a universal shortcut from critical thinking and creative thought to instant solutions and gratification, at a developmental stage of their lives, will prevent them from expanding upon their imagination. Kids no longer have to formulate the solutions to their intellectual queries. They plug simple and complex problems into an artificial machine and receive a response that is devoid of humanity. The minds of the current generation of youths are being treated as currency; they sacrifice their most valuable resources to enhance a machine mind. Their thoughts and ideas are housed in data centers, where they are continuously harvested by the generative AI programs.
Allowing underdeveloped minds such an advanced tool is not inspiring advancement; instead, it’s fomenting regression. What is the point of strengthening my mind when I have a tool that will think for me? Why would I put in the effort to formulate original thoughts when I can generate them in a second with my AI companion? Why would I risk failure on my own merit when I can hide behind a shield of code?
The lack of regulation and acknowledgement of the dangers of AI for young people encourages the establishment and normalization of a parasitic relationship between children and technology. The integration of AI into schools takes away from the purpose of the institution. Students are not learning to think for themselves; they are learning to utilize tools that will think for them. Without proper regulation, the world runs the risk of raising a generation that is devoid of leaders and filled with blind wanderers maneuvering life with a computerized walking stick.
Conclusion: How Do We Protect Youth Development without Completely Preventing the Understanding of these Generative AIs?
When used in education, technology should enhance learning; instead, students are beginning to rely on it as a means to avoid scholastic growth. Generative AI programs serve as shortcuts to bypass an authentic learning experience. The pervasion of social media platforms and the increase in youth engagement with these platforms has shifted attention from mediums and entertainment forms that foment mental expansion and stimulation in favor of content that requires little to no effort to understand. Technology may be exceeding in its function to make our lives easier; however, in consequence, it is taking our youth’s mental development as remittance.
Investing time and effort into finding equitable solutions to better regulate the utilization and implementation of generative AI and social media into the education and lives of younger people is essential. The solution to these evolving issues relies in the promotion of responsible and monitored use of these advanced programs not in their removal from schools. The idea that teachers and academic institutions can holistically prevent their students from utilizing AI is unrealistic. However, the ages at which students begin to learn and use AI coupled with how they are allowed to incorporate it into their respective academic pursuits can be monitored and regulated.
Potential solutions include: establishing classes with and without technology (as a whole), deciding a specific age level in which students are allowed to begin implementing AI use into their assignments, and creating classes that are tailored towards responsible and appropriate educational usage.
Moving forward, the most essential step is the acknowledgement of this problem and a commitment to addressing it. If people continue to ignore the issue, we run the risk of raising a generation of children who are lost without technology to guide them.
References
Basiouny, Angie. "Without Guardrails, Generative AI Can Harm Education." Knowledge at Wharton, knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/without-guardrails-generative-ai-canharm-education/. Accessed 27 Aug. 2024.
DeAngelis, Tori. Teens are spending nearly 5 hours daily on social media. Here are the mental health outcomes. American Psychological Association, Tablets for tots? Survey says kids watch videos on their own devices by age 2. Accessed 1 Apr. 2024.
Riddle, Katia. "Tablets for tots? Survey says kids watch videos on their own devices by age 2." NPR. NPR, www.npr.org/2025/02/26/nx-s1-5308593/children-screens-aicommon-sense
media#:~:text=It%27s%20important%2C%20says%20Steyer%2C%20for,presented%20t o%20them%20by%20AI. Accessed 26 Feb. 2025.
"Screen Time for Kids; How Much is Too Much?" OSF Healthcare, 2020, newsroom.osfhealthcare.org/screen-time-for-kids-how-much-is-toomuch/#:~:text=*%20Under%202%20years%20old%20%E2%80%93%20ZERO,two%20h ours%20per%20day%20(homework%20not%20included).
FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT, ASD SIDUS ROTONDI & MEMBER, NATIONAL YOUTH COUNCIL OF ITALY (CNG)
YOUTH, HEALTH, AND GLOBAL COOPERATION: BUILDING A CULTURE OF PREVENTION AND WELL-BEING
Health is not merely the absence of disease, it is the foundation upon which dreams, productivity, and the collective future of humanity are built. Yet, across the world today, many young people face silent battles that threaten their physical and mental well-being, from stress, anxiety, and unhealthy lifestyles to limited access to preventive health services.
During my recent participation in the United Nations High-Level Week, where I attended sessions dedicated to youth and health, I was reminded that the health of the next generation is both a moral responsibility and a global priority. I met inspiring young leaders from different continents, individuals who despite limited resources, are implementing innovative health projects, empowering their peers, and bringing wellness into classrooms, communities, and even digital spaces.
These encounters reaffirmed to me that youth health is a universal language one that connects us beyond borders, ideologies, and economic divides. However, what remains missing in many parts of the world is the establishment of permanent platforms for youth collaboration on health prevention, where knowledge, practices, and innovation can be exchanged globally.
As a representative of CAMPUS SALUTE ONLUS, an organization devoted to the promotion of prevention and healthy lifestyles, I see firsthand how education and awareness can transform communities. After years of successful health initiatives in Italy, we recently launched our first major outreach in New York, bringing together doctors, volunteers, and young people to offer free health screenings, wellness education, and preventive care to families. The initiative, supported by partners such as the Guglielmo Marconi Italian School of New York, Progetto Alfa, GrowTogether Foundation, and St. Patrick’s Old Cathedral, represents how partnership between civil society and global institutions can bridge the gap between knowledge and access.
But our vision must go beyond one city or country. What we need is a Global Youth Health Coalition, an international framework that unites youth organizations, universities, and local governments to share expertise, launch preventive programs, and create a unified voice for healthy living. Such a network could operate in synergy with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, especially SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals.
As I return from New York, I carry with me a renewed conviction: health prevention is not just a medical act, it is an act of peace, empowerment, and global solidarity. By working together, investing in youth leadership, and promoting wellness as a shared human right, we can build a world where prevention becomes culture and well-being becomes universal.
La salud no es simplemente la ausencia de enfermedad; es el fundamento sobre el cual se construyen los sueños, la productividad y el futuro colectivo de la humanidad. Sin embargo, en todo el mundo hoy, muchos jóvenes enfrentan batallas silenciosas que amenazan su bienestar físico y mental: estrés, ansiedad, estilos de vida poco saludables y acceso limitado a servicios de salud preventiva.
Durante mi reciente participación en la Semana de Alto Nivel de las Naciones Unidas, en la cual asistí a sesiones dedicadas a la juventud y la salud, recordé que la salud de la próxima generación es tanto una responsabilidad moral como una prioridad global. Conocí a jóvenes líderes inspiradores de diferentes continentes; personas que, a pesar de contar con recursos limitados, están implementando proyectos innovadores en el ámbito de la salud, empoderando a sus pares y llevando el bienestar a las aulas, las comunidades e incluso a los espacios digitales.
Estos encuentros me reafirmaron que la salud juvenil es un lenguaje universal, uno que nos conecta más allá de fronteras, ideologías y brechas económicas. Sin embargo, lo que aún falta en muchas partes del mundo es el establecimiento de plataformas permanentes para la colaboración juvenil en materia de prevención de la salud, donde el conocimiento, las prácticas y la innovación puedan intercambiarse a nivel global.
Como representante de CAMPUS SALUTE ONLUS, una organización dedicada a la promoción de la prevención y los estilos de vida saludables, veo de primera mano cómo la educación y la concienciación pueden transformar comunidades. Tras años de iniciativas sanitarias exitosas en Italia, recientemente lanzamos nuestra primera gran acción de alcance en Nueva York, reuniendo a médicos, voluntarios y jóvenes para ofrecer exámenes de salud gratuitos, educación sobre bienestar y atención preventiva a las familias. La iniciativa, apoyada por socios como la Escuela Italiana Guglielmo Marconi de Nueva York, Progetto Alfa, GrowTogether Foundation y la Antigua Catedral de San Patricio, representa cómo la colaboración entre la sociedad civil y las instituciones globales puede cerrar la brecha entre el conocimiento y el acceso.
Pero nuestra visión debe ir más allá de una sola ciudad o país. Lo que necesitamos es una Coalición Global para la Salud Juvenil, un marco internacional que una a organizaciones juveniles, universidades y gobiernos locales para compartir conocimientos, lanzar programas preventivos y crear una voz unificada en favor de una vida saludable. Una red como esta podría operar en sinergia con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible de las Naciones Unidas, especialmente el ODS 3: Salud y Bienestar, y el ODS 17: Alianzas para Lograr los Objetivos.
Al regresar de Nueva York, llevo conmigo una convicción renovada: la prevención en salud no es solo un acto médico; es un acto de paz, empoderamiento y solidaridad global. Trabajando juntos, invirtiendo en el liderazgo juvenil y promoviendo el bienestar como un derecho humano compartido, podemos construir un mundo donde la prevención se convierta en cultura y el bienestar en universal. JUVENTUD,
Global Humanity & Diplomacy Fellow (GHDF)
In organizations today, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are important to developing workplace cultures. Focusing on improving respect, fairness, and performance in workplaces across the world truly impacts the quality of workflow in any company. These are examples of the basis of places in which people can contribute in meaningful ways and be their best selves. It’s important to point this out, as the government and many others have taken a stance against DEI. But why?
According to CultureAlly, “Diversity refers to a variety of different characteristics within a group of people. This could mean race, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic background, and more”.
In organizations today, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are important to developing workplace cultures. Focusing on improving respect, fairness, and performance in workplaces across the world truly impacts the quality of workflow in any company. These are examples of the basis of places in which people can contribute in meaningful ways and be their best selves. It’s important to point this out, as the government and many others have taken a stance against DEI. But why?
According to CultureAlly, “Diversity refers to a variety of different characteristics within a group of people. This could mean race, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic background, and more”.
It also states, “Equity involves ensuring fair treatment, resource allocation, and opportunities for every individual. It recognizes that people are unique in their abilities, needs, and support required to achieve an equal outcome to their peers. This means addressing systemic barriers and removing disadvantages to create a level playing field for all”. Lastly, “Inclusion is the practice of creating an environment where everyone is valued, respected, and feels an overall sense of belonging at work. Inclusion makes sure everyone's voices are heard and their contributions are recognized with genuine enthusiasm”. These three concepts together create the framework of a fair and inclusive organization. Diversity doesn’t create meaningful change without equity or inclusion, and inclusion or equity can limit creativity or innovation without the representation of diversity.
I think it’s time that we view Inclusion not simply as a moral obligation but also as an important contributor to an organization's success. According to Arxiv.com, inclusive practices have created the opportunity for innovation through different perspectives and ultimately develop employee engagement in the workplace. People from diverse backgrounds improved team-based creative work, but only if inclusive mechanisms like open communication and integrated collaborative processes were in place. This implies that having different representations is not enough and that the environment needs to actively value every participant for diversity to have a real impact.
When organizations support inclusion, they support employees with feeling noticed and motivated, which in turn can lead to quicker problem solving and better overall performance. Organizations that endorse inclusion will more likely be flexible and make decisions based on a broad range of perspectives and experiences. Although DEI is understood to be important, several challenges make it less than effective. Three of those challenges are not priority, with no measurable approach, and lack of resources.
DEI has been given the impression that it’s just an option, not a priority in many organizations. DEI objectives are likely to be short term or symbolic. Research shows that the lack of leadership emphasizing DEI as part of organizational strategy results in stagnation of organizational progress.
2.
While some organizations espouse DEI publicly, most do not set measurable goals or develop systems to continue to measure progress. Without metrics, it is hard to judge the outcomes of actions taken or hold decision makers accountable. Without a clear strategy, action tends towards more symbolic than substantive.
DEI initiatives will not produce meaningful progress if there is not sufficient funding, support, and expertise. We need the government to show initiative and continue to support DEI in our workplaces, as they are becoming more diverse and faster than ever. Training, employee resource groups, and inclusive leaders rely on funding, but also require administrative support. Without resources, there will be inconsistency in efforts which would ultimately lead to business regression.
DEI will receive fewer resources when it is a low priority, and at the same time, it is difficult to put in place the measurable strategies for improvement when limited resources are associated with DEI. Solving these challenges will take continuous engagement from leadership, accountability structures, and integration into organizational plans for DEI goals.
Linking DEI to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
The United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlights 17 interconnected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that aim to achieve peace and prosperity for people and the planet. DEI directly supports two of these goals: SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality).
This goal is to decrease inequality within and between countries. It’s a call to action, for the empowerment and inclusion of everyone, regardless of their age, gender, disability, race, ethnicity, origin, religion, or economic status. DEI supports SDG 10 by encouraging fair and inclusive workplace policies, opposing discrimination and bias, and providing equal opportunity to success. Fair hiring practices, pay transparency, and available promotional opportunities all help to reduce inequality and cultivate more equitable outcomes across groups.
This goal is aimed at securing gender equality and empowering all women and girls. So this would include aspects such as the elimination of discrimination and violence against women, equal opportunities for participation and leadership in decision-making, and inclusive leadership. I believe that we need to create organizational DEI initiatives that empower women professionally, advancing them in their careers, and paying them equally to men. We need to provide mentorship and leadership opportunities to enhance achievement of SDG 5. Whether it be creating mentorship programs, offering funded courses, or providing emotional support through various health initiatives. Gender equality is needed for sustainable development, and organizations that prioritize gender equality enhance their internal culture and their social impact in the community.
Organizations support both systemic respect and collective advancement when DEI efforts are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. DEI strategies should be incorporated into inter- and intra- institutional workplace policies that ensure the fruits of development are shared equally; and all human beings can participate in the development process regardless of their identity or context.
DEI presents an opportunity for young changemakers and upcoming leaders to examine inclusive and sustainable forms of leadership. Several actions can support these principles:
Encourage leaders of an organization to consider DEI as a strategic priority as opposed to a compliance requirement
Support the establishment of measurable goals and accountability structures to monitor progress
Advocate for an appropriate level of resource allocation to adequately support DEI initiatives
Support a commitment to inclusive decision-making and create spaces that support the input of diverse voices
Connect DEI to SDG 5 and SDG 10, as these frameworks resonate across the globe when implementing inclusive and sustainable leadership.
Youth leaders can help maintain DEI momentum by advocating and peer-educating, and through institutional engagement. Inclusion should not be viewed as a choice value; it is a core value that informs how societies and institutions function.
Debates around DEI are continuing to shape public discourse; and organizations need to realize that diversity, equity, and inclusion are not just useless trends made up to limit people, but rather to open up the opportunity to lasting imperatives. These principles form the foundation of workplaces, allow people to thrive, grow, and perform at their best. Rejecting DEI means neglecting the very systems that promote fairness, innovation, and progress. With the prioritization of DEI in organizations while aligning it with the Sustainable Development Goals, we create roads for growth that reach beyond walls, reaching communities and inspiring global change.
Reference
United Nations. “Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries.” United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/inequality/
United Nations. “Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.” United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. “Reduced Inequalities.” UN SDG Knowledge Platform. Retrieved from https://unsdg.un.org/sdgs/reducedinequalities
Track2Training. “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI): Exploring the effectiveness of human resource strategies and practices.” (2023). Retrieved from https://track2training.com/2023/09/24/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-dei-exploring-theeffectiveness-of-human-resource-strategies-and-practices-in-fostering-diversityequity-and-inclusion-in-the-workplace
Vedres, B. & Vasarhelyi, O. “Inclusion unlocks the creative potential of gender diversity in teams.” arXiv Preprint (2022). Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08505
California Management Review. “Why organizations should shift focus from DEI to decision-making.” (2025). Retrieved from https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2025/03/whyorganizations-should-shift-focus-from-dei-to-decision-making
Diversity, Equity ne Inclusion (DEI): Nkabom ne Adesua Wɔ Adwumam
Ɛnnɛ, adwumayɛ mu, ahintasɛm a ɛfa Diversity, Equity ne Inclusion (DEI) ho yɛ ade kɛse wɔ sɛnea adwumayɛ mu amansan yɛ. Ɛyɛ ho hia sɛ yɛbɔ ho ban na yɛmpere adwuma mu nyansa, obu, ne pɛ ade mu, efisɛ eyi na ɛboa ma adwumayɛ mu yɛ papa, na ɛma adwumayɛ nkɔanim. Eyikyerɛ baabi a nnipa betumi de wɔn ho aboa, na wɔanya hokwan sɛ wɔyɛ wɔn ho papa paa. Ɛhohia sɛ yɛka ho asɛm, efisɛ aban ne nnipa bebree agyina akyi de bɔ DEI abɔne. Nanso, adɛn nti?
Wɔ CultureAlly mu no, wɔka sɛ, “Diversity kyerɛ sɛ nnipa wɔ suban ahorow mu. Eyi betumi akyerɛ abusua, nkɔnnɔm, bɔne ne suban, mmarima ne mmea, ɔpɛ ne ho nimdeɛ, mfe, ne sika mu ne nkɔsoɔ a ɛda ho.” Wɔsan ka sɛ, “Equity yɛ ade a ɛkyerɛ sɛ obiara nya adwumam mu akatua, akwan ne nkɔsoɔ a ɛteɛ. Eyi kyerɛ sɛ nnipa nyinaa yɛ ɔfã bi a ɛho hia wɔn ho, ne mfaso a ɛsɛ sɛ wɔnya de bɛyɛ ade sɛ wɔn ho betumi aboa wɔn sɛnea ɛbɛyɛ a wɔn nsɛm ne wɔn ho yɛ pɛ.” Akyire no, wɔka sɛ, “Inclusion yɛ adwuma a ɛbɔ mu sɛ obiara wɔ ne baabi wɔ adwuma mu, ɔwɔ obu, na ɔte sɛ ɔwɔ ne baabi. Inclusion ma obiara tumi ka ne nsɛm, na wɔn a wɔwɔ adwuma mu nyinaa hu ne mfasoɔ.”
Nsɛm abiɛsa yi (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) ka bom no, ɛyɛ ntotoho a ɛda hɔ ma adwumayɛ a ɛyɛ pɛ. Sɛ Diversity nni ho a, Equity ne Inclusion nko ara betumi abɔ mu denam, na sɛ Inclusion anaa Equity nni ho a, ɛbɛtumi ahyɛ nkɔsoɔ ne nyansahu ase wɔ
Diversity mu.
Nsɛm Foforɔ a ɛfiri Inclusion mu
Ɛsɛ sɛ yɛhwɛ Inclusion sɛ ade a ɛyɛ ho hia na ɛboa adwumayɛ nkɔsoɔ. Wɔ Arxiv.com mu no, wɔka sɛ, adwumayɛ a ɛyɛ inclusive no ma nkɔsoɔ a ɛfiri nsusui ahorow ne nyansahu mu, na ɛma nnipa a wɔwɔ adwumam mu yɛ adwuma a ɛyɛ dɛ. Sɛ nnipa fi akwan ahorow mu de wɔn ho hyɛ adwumam mu a, ɛma adwumayɛ yɛ papa, nanso ɛsɛ sɛ ɛyɛ paa sɛ ɛma obiara tumi ka ne nsɛm, na adwumayɛ no bu wɔn ho.
Sɛ adwumayɛ boa Inclusion a, ɛma nnipa hu sɛ wɔhɔ, na wɔwɔ mfasoɔ. Eyi ma adwuma yɛ ntɛm, na wɔtumi bu nneɛma yie. Adwumayɛ a ɛde Inclusion si anim no, yɛ den, na ɛma wɔyɛ adwumayɛ gyinaeɛ a ɛda ho adi. Nanso, DEI mu nsɛm no, ɛwɔ ɔhaw a ɛma ɛnyɛ mfasoɔ pii. Ɔhaw mmiɛnsa titiriw ne:
1. Ɔkwan a Wɔmfa Ho Nni Kan (Lack of Prioritization)
Ɛyɛ sɛ nnipa bu DEI sɛ nea ɛyɛ apɛdeɛ nko ara, na ɛnyɛ ade a ɛsɛ sɛ wɔde si anim wɔ adwumayɛ mu. DEI bɛyɛ sɛ mmɔden kakra anaa biribi a ɛyɛ fɛ wɔ ani so. Sɛ mpanimfoɔ nni DEI ho adwene a, ɛma adwumayɛ nkɔsoɔ gyina hɔ a ɛnni mu.
2. Ɔhaw a ɛfiri sɛ Wɔnni Nhwehwɛmu (Absence of Measurable Strategy and Accountability)
Ɛwɔ mu sɛ adwumayɛ pii ka DEI ho asɛm, nanso wɔnni akwan a ɛda ho adi sɛnea wɔbɛhwehwɛ nkɔsoɔ ne sɛnea wɔbɛboa wɔn a wɔhwɛ adwuma so. Sɛ nhwehwɛmu nni hɔ a, ɛyɛ den sɛ wobɛhu nea wɔayɛ no mfasoɔ.
3. Sika ne Mmoa a Ɛyɛ Kakra (Insufficient Resources and Support)
DEI bɛyɛ adwuma a ɛwɔ mfasoɔ pɛ sɛ sika ne mmoa a ɛsɛ wɔ ho nni hɔ. Yɛn hia aban ne mpanimfoɔ a wɔbɛboa DEI nkɔsoɔ, efisɛ adwumayɛ mu ayɛ nkɔnsɔnkɔnsɔn. Sɛ sika nni hɔ a, adwumayɛ no bɛyɛ nwanwasɛm, na ɛbɛma nkɔsoɔ no ntena hɔ.
DEI ne Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
United Nations 2030 Agenda de Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 17 aba a ɛbɛma asomdwoeɛ ne nkɔsoɔ wɔ wiase. DEI boa SDG mmienu titiriw: SDG 10 (Sɛnea Wɔbɛyɛ Pɛyɛ Ahorow) ne SDG 5 (Mmarima ne Mmaa Pɛyɛ).
SDG 10: Sɛnea Wɔbɛyɛ Pɛyɛ Ahorow
Eyi yɛ sɛnea wɔbɛkyekyɛ pɛyɛ horow wɔ aman mu ne aman ntam. DEI boa ma mmara yɛ pɛ, ɛma obiara nya hokwan, na ɛma obiara tumi nya nkɔsoɔ wɔ adwumayɛ mu.
SDG 5: Mmarima ne Mmaa Pɛyɛ
Eyi de, wɔbɛboa mmaa ne mmea nyinaa sɛ wɔbɛnya nkɔsoɔ ne tumi wɔ wɔn nkɔsoɔ mu.
Eyi kyerɛ sɛ wɔbɛsɔre ɔhaw a ɛwɔ mmaa so, ma wɔn ho kwan sɛ wɔbɛka ho wɔ mpaninfoɔ gyinaeɛ ne adwumayɛ mu. Yɛsɛ sɛ yɛma mmaa tumi nya mpanyin ne nkɔsoɔ nhyiam, na yɛma wɔn ka ho wɔ sika ne akwankyerɛ mu.
Nsɛm a ɛfiri DEI mu a ɛboa mmɔfra mpanimfoɔ
DEI ma mmɔfra mpanimfoɔ ne nkurɔfoɔ a wopɛ sɛ wɔyɛ mpanyin hwɛ kwan a ɛyɛ inclusive ne sustainable. Nnipa betumi ayɛ nsɛm a ɛte sɛ:
Ma mpanimfoɔ nhwɛ DEI sɛ ade a ɛsɛ sɛ wɔyɛ, ɛnyɛ sɛ compliance nko ara
Ma wɔyɛ nhwehwɛmu a ɛda ho adi, na ɛma obiara hu nkɔsoɔ
Sɔre ma sika ne mmoa a ɛsɛ wɔ DEI ho
Bɔ mmɔden ma obiara ka ne nsɛm wɔ adwumayɛ mu
Fa DEI ka SDG 5 ne SDG 10 ho, efisɛ ɛyɛ ade a ɛho hia wiase nyinaa
Awiei
Nkɔmmɔ a ɛfa DEI ho reba so, na adwumayɛ mu nsɛm no kyerɛ sɛ, Diversity, Equity ne
Inclusion nyɛ ade a wɔde bɛhyɛ nkurɔfo anim na wɔntumi nni ho, na mmom ɛyɛ ade a ɛbue kwan ma nkɔsoɔ a ɛtena hɔ. Sɛ yɛde DEI si anim wɔ adwumayɛ mu, na yɛka ho SDGs ho, ɛma nkɔsoɔ kɔ akyirikyiri, na ɛma nnipa nyinaa tumi ka ho wɔ nkɔsoɔ mu.
R E F L E C T I O
M F E L L O W S
At Ariel Foundation International, we believe that every voice: no matter where it comes from, carries the power to inspire, heal, and transform From regions of stability to those touched by conflict, young leaders across our global network embody courage and resilience
This reflection, written by an Ariel Foundation International Fellow from Afghanistan, offers a deeply personal perspective on hope, education, and the pursuit of peace in challenging circumstances It reminds us that transformation often begins in silence, through the quiet strength of one individual daring to imagine a better world.
Through this contribution, we celebrate not only the voice of one Fellow but the collective spirit of over 150,000 young people worldwide who continue to turn adversity into purpose, and purpose into action
BETWEEN
Global
Humanity & Diplomacy Fellow (GHDF)
Walking into the United Nations, 30th Anniversary of the World Programme of Action for Youth, felt surreal. The room was buzzing: languages overlapping, translators whispering, camera flashes cutting through the crowd. Delegates came from all over the world, youth in bright traditional clothes, young leaders clutching folders full of ideas that could change the world. It was hopeful, almost contagious. I was there with the Ariel Foundation, listening to children and youth from dozens of countries share the work they’ve done in their own communities. I am thankful to Dr. Ariel King, the founder of the Ariel Foundation, for giving me this opportunity.
There was something powerful about hearing a girl from India talk about building a sustainable start-up in her city, or a young woman from Afghanistan describing the plight of Afghan girls barred from education.
Every story carried this mix of pain and pride, the kind of resilience that doesn’t come from reading books or sitting in conferences. There was no trace of victimhood in their voices. There was pride. There was ownership. You could feel that they weren’t waiting for permission to make a difference. These were young people who had lived the challenges they were trying to fix and who had felt what it meant to lose access to education, to see their communities destroyed, and still find a way to rebuild something meaningful.
As I listened, I remember thinking that these were the people actually holding up the idea of “development” that institutions always talk about. Not the donors or the diplomats, but the youth on the ground, working after school, raising money online, teaching others, trying to fix what’s been broken for generations. But as I sat there, I couldn’t ignore the dissonance between the stories shared inside the UN and the realities these youth would return to outside it. It’s easy to feel empowered when you’re sitting in that grand chamber, surrounded by microphones and blue flags, but most of these young people would be flying home to power outages, unstable governments, and communities where progress depends on borrowed laptops and personal sacrifice. The same young leaders who stood behind microphones speaking about climate justice or girls’ education will soon be back in places where rain floods their classrooms, where electricity cuts off mid-meeting, or where the next protest might land them in danger. Many of them talked about projects sustained by pure passion rather than reliable funding.
The applause they received in that room was genuine, but applause doesn’t pay for rent, transportation, or supplies. It doesn’t guarantee safety for those defending women’s rights in places where even speaking up is dangerous. And it doesn’t change the fact that many youth activists burn out long before anyone even knows their names. Sitting there, I kept thinking about how institutions love to highlight youth work but rarely invest in it. The stories we clapped for were the same stories that should have received grants, mentorship, or protection. It’s the kind of contrast that hits slowly. At first, you clap and smile and feel proud to be part of a movement that calls itself “global.” But as the speeches go on, you start noticing what isn’t being said. How many of these youth projects survive more than a year? How many of these kids will get invited back once the event is over? Several young speakers hinted at that too, carefully, respectfully, but with honesty. A young boy from Haiti said, “We have been ready and doing the work. But the question is, are YOU?”. It’s one thing to celebrate youth voices, and another to hand over the mic permanently.
During the break, I overheard a young boy and a young girl walking around and asking people for their LinkedIn. Some were only thirteen or fifteen. I remember standing there thinking; How are they this proactive at such a young age? They weren’t shy or intimidated by the setting. They walked right up to people, introduced themselves, and talked about what they cared about. It was simple, but powerful to watch.
There was no sense of hesitation or fear, just this quiet kind of confidence, like they knew exactly why they were there. It made me realize how much courage it takes to show up in a place like that at such a young age, to speak, to connect, to try. They were fully aware of how big the world was, and still dared to believe they could change it. Their bravery comes from necessity and from realizing that if they don’t speak up, no one else will. When it ended, I didn’t leave right away. The room still buzzed, people hugging, exchanging contacts, laughing, taking group photos with the UN logo in the background. You could tell people really meant it when they said, “Let’s keep in touch.” It felt like nobody wanted to lose that moment. I felt proud. Proud to have been there, proud to have heard those voices. I kept thinking about how young everyone was, and how brave. Some of them were barely teenagers, already leading projects, already representing their countries. I couldn’t stop thinking about that. It made me realize that change doesn’t always start with experience or age. Sometimes it starts with just deciding that something isn’t right and doing something about it.
I think what I took away most from that day was a sense of perspective. The UN, for all its size and complexity, managed to bring all these young people into one room. It gave them a space, albeit not a perfect one, but a space to share and connect. And that matters. Because maybe the speeches and declarations don’t change everything overnight, but the connections do. The friendships, the quiet conversations, and the small exchanges of ideas were a start with a hopeful path ahead.
Walking out, I felt both full and calm. Full of thoughts, of people’s words still echoing in my head. Calm because I knew the work doesn’t end there, not for them and not for us. The event didn’t fix the world, but it reminded me that there are people everywhere trying. And that, somehow, makes it feel a little more possible.
On March 27, 2015, at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Ariel Foundation International made history as the first organization in the world to accredit children aged 8–17 and youth as official delegates to the United Nations Human Rights Council
This groundbreaking moment gave young voices the platform to speak on issues that shape their lives, marking a global milestone in youth inclusion and participation
This achievement went further as Ariel Foundation International became the first NGO globally to host a Children’s Side Event at the United Nations, allowing young delegates to lead dialogues on human rights, education, and global well-being. Their courage, insight, and leadership continue to inspire a worldwide movement, proving that when children are empowered to speak, the world listens.
Our mission is simple yet profound: To nurture compassion-driven leadership, promote youth inclusion in global decision-making, and inspire actions that create lasting social impact.
Ariel Foundation International stands as a living testament to what is possible when compassion meets purpose and youth are recognised not merely as beneficiaries, but as equal partners in shaping the future From its founding vision to empower children and young adults through education, leadership, and community service, Ariel Foundation International has consistently advanced the principle that every young person, regardless of geography or circumstance, deserves a seat at the table of decision-making.
On March 27, 2015, at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, Ariel Foundation International made global history For the first time ever, children between the ages of 8 and 17 were officially accredited as official delegates to the United Nations Human Rights Council, representing themselves and their peers, and voicing the concerns and hopes of their generation before world leaders This single act broke institutional boundaries and redefined participation within the UN system Ariel Foundation International also became the first organisation globally to convene and sponsor a children’s side event at the United Nations, and to support youth serving as official delegate and panelists at the Human Rights Council, a milestone that embedded the voices of young people into the heart of multilateral dialogue
Since that transformative moment, Ariel Foundation International’s reach has expanded across more than fifty countries, impacting over 150,000 young people worldwide. Through our programmes, children and young adults evolve into ChangeMakers, leaders of conscience equipped with the skills, confidence, and platforms to
advocate for themselves, influence national and international policies, and strengthen their communities through innovation and service.
Ariel Foundation International’s contribution to global development extends beyond participation, it shapes systems Through strategic collaboration with United Nations agencies, the European Parliament, governments, and civil society, Ariel Foundation International has institutionalised opportunities for youth to transform local leadership into international advocacy Our delegates and fellows represent a living bridge between grassroots realities and global policymaking, ensuring that the Sustainable Development Goals are informed by the perspectives of those they most directly affect.
As we look toward Ariel Foundation International’s 2030 Vision, our commitment is to deepen inclusion, scale impact, and sustain global partnerships that advance youth leadership, gender equality, social entrepreneurship, and human rights We envision a world where every young person, no matter their origin, possesses the education, voice, and agency to build peaceful, equitable, and resilient communities.
The next chapter of global governance demands courage and collaboration It demands that we not only speak about youth but continue to speak with them, empowering each voice to echo across international corridors of power. Ariel Foundation International will continue to lead this movement, reaffirming our founding belief: that humanity’s greatest strength lies in its youngest hearts and most determined minds
Ariel Foundation International is in Special Consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations
wwwarielfoundationorg
“When We Empower One Young Person, We Ignite a Ripple that Transforms Humanity”
FOUNDER
"Empowerment is not about giving power but about releasing the power they already have."
This quote embodies the spirit of Dr. Ariel Rosita King's work in fostering empowerment and creating opportunities for individuals and communities to thrive Dr King's dedication to empowering children and youth, fostering their active involvement in international decision-making processes, has garnered widespread recognition and acclaim
As the Founder and President of Ariel Foundation International, a non-profit organization founded in 2002, holding special consultative ECOSOC Status with the United Nations (2016) and NGO Status at the European Parliament (2015). Registered in the USA, France, Switzerland, and Ghana. Dr. King has made a significant impact on the lives of youth across 30+ countries. With a focus on leadership, entrepreneurship, and community service, AFI has impacted approximately 150,000 young individuals
Notably, Ariel Foundation International made history by accrediting children and youth as official Delegates to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva Through her foundation, Dr King has promoted partnerships, peace, and prosperity through entrepreneurship and education
Dr Ariel Rosita King is an accomplished individual with an extensive background in international health, public health policy, and international management With over 35 years of experience in government, diplomacy, business, and NGOs, she has worked and lived in 11
countries and travelled to over 65 countries across Asia, Africa, Americas, Middle East, and Europe. As a Professor in International Health, Management, Policy, and Environment, she has shared her knowledge and expertise at various universities in the USA, Europe, and Africa.
Dr King's contributions extend beyond her work with Ariel Foundation international She was chosen to be on the Expert AIDS Prevention working Group with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (USA) and the Human Science Research Council (South Africa) Additionally, In 2000, Dr King established Ariel Consulting International, Inc , now known as Dr King Solutions (www drkingsolutions com), a company focused on enhancing Public-Private Partnerships in international health, policy, and management specifically in developing countries Her commitment to promoting collaboration and sustainable development has led to the successful implementation of strategic planning initiatives, workshops, coaching, and keynote speeches aimed at empowering individuals and organizations.
Notably, Dr. King is a strong advocate for professional development. Her offerings include comprehensive training programs such as Strategic Planning for International Business Development, Public-Private Partnerships, European and African University Degrees without debt, Ivy League Training without debt, and guidance on starting not-for-profit organizations and international businesses.
Dr King's dedication to promoting positive change on a global scale has also led her to engage with various international organizations She assists businesses in obtaining Special ECOSOC Status with the United Nations, promotes alliances within the international NGO arena, and encourages business engagements with NGOs and Community-Based Organizations Beyond her remarkable achievements, Dr King remains committed to environmental sustainability Through her latest venture, Dr King Solutions, she provides eco-friendly bags that combat plastic pollution Every purchase contributes to the fight against plastic pollution and supports the Ariel Foundation International's vital work in children and youth development through research and environmental climate services.
Dr King's commitment to advocating for Children's Human Rights worldwide led her to establish the Ariana-Leilani Children's Foundation International in 2008 By founding this organization, she aimed to educate and advocate for the rights of children globally, emphasizing the importance of their well-being.
A testament to Dr. King's impact is her most recent work, the book titled 'Humanity Unveiled.' This profound and enlightening journey invites leaders and seekers beyond the ordinary, guiding them to uncover the essence of humanity and its transformative power in shaping a more compassionate world. Through intimate encounters with luminaries such as Dr. Maya Angelou, Dr. Nina Simone, President Nelson Mandela, and Dr Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, Dr King weaves a rich fabric of insight and enlightenment These encounters serve as poignant lessons, revealing the profound impact each human connection can have on our collective understanding of what it truly means to be human 'Humanity Unveiled' is not merely a book; it is a transformative journey that calls upon leaders and dreamers to embrace their humanity and contribute to the evolution towards a more compassionate and connected world Dr Ariel King's profound insights resonate with readers, sparking a renewed sense of purpose and a profound appreciation for the human experience
Dr. King's influence extends beyond her foundation and book. She has served as a representative for various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) at the United Nations in Geneva, Vienna, and New York. She has also been an active member of organizations such as Women Impacting Public Policy (WIPP), the Women's Foreign Policy Group (WFPG), and various International Rotary Clubs. Dr. Ariel King's lifetime commitment to empowering children and youth, promoting international health, advocating for Children's Human Rights, and fostering publicprivate partnerships has made a remarkable impact on communities worldwide. Her leadership, expertise, and dedication to making a difference position her as an influential woman deserving of recognition Dr Ariel King is a true champion and inspiration, embodying the spirit of empowerment and the pursuit of a more compassionate world Her Favorite quote by Hillel, "If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, then when?" reflects her belief in taking action and bearing personal responsibility
She has embraced the missing piece in this quote, realizing the importance of asking, "If not me, then who?" Through her remarkable journey, she has become a beacon of hope and inspiration, shining light on the power of empowerment and the significance of making a difference in the lives of others.
EXECUTIVE AIDE TO DR ARIEL ROSITA KING DIRECTOR, AFRICA REGION & PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED NATIONS, GENEVA
Moses Ekwere is a distinguished global leader, environmentalist, and youth advocate whose work spans continents bridging local action with international diplomacy A 2022 recipient of the AFI Hillel Lifetime Achievement Award for Leadership, he embodies excellence, integrity, and service through decades of impact-driven initiatives aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
As Country Director for the Africa Region and Permanent Representative of Ariel Foundation International to the United Nations in Geneva, Moses has spearheaded transformative programs of global relevance He coordinated the Jamestown Seaside Clean-Up Initiative in Accra, Ghana, during the 2024 Global Youth Service Day, mobilizing over 100 youth volunteers, in partnership with Ecozoil Waste
Management Company, to remove nearly two tons of plastic waste while advancing community education and waste audits
Under his leadership, the Ariel Foundation International Malaria Elimination and Public Health Education Campaign reached over 1,000 families, providing treated mosquito nets and preventive health education delivered in indigenous languages, strengthening community wellbeing, cultural identity, and sustainable health practices.
He also championed “Voices for Earth:
Youth-led Advocacy Summit to End Plastic Pollution” for World Environment Day 2025, in partnership with the Rotary Club of Stone Mountain and under the UNEP global campaign, amplifying youth voices in climate diplomacy and supporting progress toward a Global Plastics Treaty.
Globally recognized for his diplomatic acumen and commitment to intergenerational collaboration, Moses also leads the Roots of Resilience Project, which aims to plant one million fruit trees and establish school botanical gardens across Africa to advance climate education and environmental literacy. The initiative integrates STEM education and clean energy advocacy, empowering young innovators for a sustainable future
A graduate of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana, with a BBA in Human Resource Management, Moses Ekwere embodies visionary leadership rooted in service, integrity, and transformation He envisions a world where youth leadership becomes the driving force for achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, inspiring action that transcends borders, cultures, and generations
GLOBAL HUMANITY & DIPLOMACY
FELLOW (GHDF)
Axel Beugre is a student about to begin his legal practice training in London. He holds a degree in International Relations and Global Affairs from Università Cattolica of Milan and an MSc in International Development from the London School of Economics (LSE) He later pursued legal studies in London and is completing a Master of Laws in Legal Practice
Throughout his academic career, he has focused on the economic and socio-cultural development of marginalized communities He explored these topics in two dissertations: his undergraduate thesis (“Social Movements and Political Change: a theoretical analysis of the Black Lives Matter Movement”) analyses social movements as drivers of change through the case of Black Lives Matter; his master’s thesis at
LSE (“The Price of Prejudice: A critical analysis of the socio-economic consequences of anti-migrant narratives in Italy on the Black Italian population”) examines the socio-economic impact of anti-migrant discourse in Italian media on Black Italians
GLOBAL HUMANITY & DIPLOMACY FELLOW (GHDF), ARIEL FOUNDATION INT’L REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, USA
Colin Royal is a recent graduate of Morehouse College, where he completed a double major in English and Journalism. At Morehouse, he obtained the distinction of CoValedictoriant while being heavily involved on-campus.
He worked with the Morehouse Honors Program, the Maroon Tiger (the campus paper), among other social/communal organizations He was the former Editorin-Chief of The Maroon Tiger and Director of Morehouse Journalism Departments 2024-2025 Senior Capstone Documentary Furthermore, during his time at Morehouse he was named a Nike Journalism Scholarship Fellow and a Jordan Journalism Scholarship Fellow.
Other major positions that he has held in the past include: Managing Editor of Print for The Maroon Tiger (2023-2024), Arts & Entertainment Editor for The
Maroon Tiger (2022-2023), Secretary for the Psi Chapter of Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc (2023-2024), and cofounder/inaugural treasurer of Morehouse’s NABJ Chapter (2023-2024).
Professionally, he has worked with multiple companies and institutions from within a variety of disciplines. He started his journey as a journalist as a freelance writer for an online fashion and entrepreneurship company:
Makingabrand co He then briefly explored disciplines outside of journalism, interning
at UC Santa Barbara and the Henrico County and Richmond Juvenile & Domestic Relations District Courts
He would move back into the media/journalism space interning at Dow Jones as a member of their inaugural HBCU Media Collective program and the National Association of Investment Companies (media externship). Most recently, Colin spent 10 weeks working with Harvard Business Publishing, gaining experience on both the business and production side of journalism. Currently, he is working on getting his masters degree from NYU
FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT, ASD SIDUS
ROTONDI & MEMBER, NATIONAL YOUTH COUNCIL OF ITALY (CNG)
Pierdomenico Izzo is a dynamic professional and youth advocate whose work bridges the fields of sports management, youth leadership, and community development With a strong foundation in international business and sports governance, he has consistently advanced initiatives that integrate physical well-being, civic participation, and sustainable development.
He currently serves with the Italian Dance Sport Federation (FIDS) in administration, accounting, and territorial coordination, contributing to the institutional governance of sports at the national level His prior work with NADO Italia – Sport e Salute S p A, the national body responsible for antidoping operations under the World AntiDoping Agency (WADA), reflects his deep commitment to integrity, ethics, and fairness in sport
An advocate for active citizenship and
inclusion, Pierdomenico is the Founder and President of ASD Sidus Rotondi, an association dedicated to promoting sports culture and education as tools for social cohesion. Under his leadership, the organization has strengthened community participation through inclusive sporting events, educational programs, and public health advocacy
His vision to transform the Valle Caudina into a recognized “City of Sport” under the Fondazione Sport Caudium demonstrates his belief in sport as a pathway to community resilience and shared wellbeing.
A member of the National Youth Council of Italy (CNG), he contributes to national dialogues on youth policy and representation, ensuring that young people’s voices remain central to shaping Italy’s social and developmental priorities
He is also affiliated with Manager Sportivi Associati (MSA), a professional body representing sports management experts across Italy.
Pierdomenico holds a Master’s Degree in Sport Business Management and a Bachelor’s Degree in International Business Administration from Link Campus University, Rome, alongside advanced certification in Olympic and Sports Management from Scuola dello Sport – Sport e Salute S p A
Guided by the principles of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 3, 4, 5, 10, and 17), his work emphasizes good health and well-being, quality education, gender equality, reduced inequalities, and global partnerships Through his leadership, he continues to advance the values of fair play, integrity, and inclusion, fostering environments where sport becomes a bridge between people, nations, and generations
GLOBAL HUMANITY & DIPLOMACY FELLOW (GHDF)
Jeffrey Osei Nyarko is a promising visionary Ghanaian-American student at New York University, studying Leadership and Management with a minor in Global Affairs. Passionate about youth empowerment, leadership, and international development, he aspires to be involved in Youth Development at the United Nations after graduation.
Jeffrey attended the Africa Prosperity Dialogues hosted by the Africa Prosperity Network during the UN General Assembly, where he engaged with global leaders on advancing Africa’s economic integration and sustainable growth Grounded in his faith and cultural heritage, Jeffrey is dedicated to helping shape a future where young Africans lead with integrity, innovation, and purpose toward a more unified and prosperous continent.
GLOBAL HUMANITY & DIPLOMACY FELLOW (GHDF)
Hameeda Uloomi is a senior at Yale University studying Political Science, with a focus on international development, foreign aid strategy, and humanitarian law. She is a Les Aspin Fellow and member of Yale’s Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy, where her research examines the consequences of U.S. foreign assistance withdrawal in Jordan, Oman, and Kenya.
Beyond her academic work, Hameeda is the founder of HerKitaab, an initiative supporting refugee and conflict-affected women through mentorship, education access, and storytelling Her leadership has helped place Afghan girls in schools and universities worldwide and raise emergency funds for displaced students
She has also worked on refugee resettlement and policy advocacy, collaborating with congressional offices and NGOs to advance rights and equity.
